This document discusses process costing and compares it to job order costing. Process costing is used when a company mass produces uniform products continuously. Costs are tracked by production department rather than individual jobs. Equivalent units of production are calculated using the weighted average method to determine the cost per unit. The key document is the production cost report which shows quantity, costs and unit costs by department. A comprehensive example is provided to illustrate calculating equivalent units, unit costs and completing a production cost report for the mixing department of a company that makes waffles.
Best VIP Call Girls Noida Sector 18 Call Me: 8448380779
Â
ch.31 process costing.ppt
1. The Nature of
Process Cost Systems
ī§Process cost systems are used to apply costs to
similar products that are mass-produced in a
continuous fashion.
ī§ In a process costing environment, finished units are
normally indistinguishable from each other.
2. Job Order versus Process
Cost Systems
ī§ In a job order cost system, costs are assigned to
each job.
ī§ In a process cost system, costs are tracked through
a series of connected manufacturing processes or
departments, rather than by individual jobs.
ī§ Thus, process cost systems are used when a large
volume of uniform, or relatively homogeneous,
products are produced.
3. Job Order Cost and
Process Cost Flow
Direct Materials
Direct Labor
Manufacturing
Overhead
Cost of Goods Sold
Finished Goods
Inventory
Work in Process
Inventory
Job 101
Job 102
Job 103
Job Order Cost Flow
Direct
Materials
Direct Labor
Manufacturing
Overhead
Work in
Process -
Department A
Work in
Process -
Department B
Finished
Goods
Inventory
Cost of Goods
Sold
Process Cost Flow
4. Job Order versus Process
Cost Systems: Similarities
ī§ The manufacturing cost elements: Both systems
track Direct Materials, Direct Labor, and
Manufacturing Overhead.
ī§ The accumulation of the costs: Both systems
accumulate costs by debiting Raw Materials
Inventory, Factory Labor, and Manufacturing
Overhead.
ī§ The flow of costs: Both systems assign costs to
Work in Process, Finished Goods, and Cost of Goods
Sold. The method of assigning costs differs
significantly, however.
5. Job Order versus Process
Cost Systems: Differences
ī§ The number of work in process accounts used:
A job order cost system uses only one work in
process account. Process cost systems use a
separate work in process account for each
production department or manufacturing process.
ī§ Documents used to track costs: In a job order
cost system, costs are charged to individual jobs
and summarized on a job cost sheet. In a process
cost system, costs are summarized in a
production cost report for each department.
6. Job Order versus Process
Cost Systems: Differences
ī§ The point at which costs are totaled: In job
order cost system, total costs are determined
when the job is completed. In a process cost
system, total costs are determined at the end of a
period of time, such as a month or year.
ī§ Unit cost computations: In a job order cost
system, the unit cost is the total cost per job
divided by the units produced. In a process cost
system, the unit cost is total manufacturing costs
for the period divided by the units produced
during the period.
7. Job Order versus Process
Cost Systems: Summary
Features
Work in process
accounts
Documents used
Determination of total
manufacturing costs
Unit-cost computations
Process Cost System
One for each process
Production cost reports
Each period
Total manufacturing
costs ī¸ Units produced
during the period
Job Order Cost
System
One for multiple jobs
Job cost sheets
Each job
Costs of each job ī¸
Units produced for the
job
8. Differences Between Job-Order
and Process Costing
Job order costing
â Many jobs are worked during
the period.
â Costs are accumulated by
individual jobs.
â Job cost sheet is the key
document.
â Unit cost computed by job.
Process costing
â A single product is produced
for a long period of time.
â Costs are accumulated by
departments.
â Department production
report is key document.
â Unit costs are computed by
department.
9. Process Cost Flow
Manufacturing
Costs
Raw Materials
Factory Labor
Manufacturing
Overhead
assigned to
Work in Process
Production
Department A
Costs
transferred
out to
Finished Goods
Inventory
Cost of
Goods
Sold
Work in Process
Production
Department B
Cost of
completed
work
Cost of
Goods Sold
10. Process Cost Flow
Tyler Company uses a process cost system to account for its
manufacture of automatic can openers.
ī§ Manufacturing consists of two processes: Machining and
Assembly. Materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead
can be added in both departments.
ī§ When the Machining Department finishes its work, the
partially completed units are transferred to the Assembly
Department.
ī§ In the Assembly Department, the goods are finished and are
then transferred to Finished Goods.
ī§ Upon sale, the goods are removed from Finished Goods and
become Cost of Goods Sold.
11. Assignment of
Manufacturing Costs
ī§ As indicated earlier, the accumulation of the costs of
materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead is the
same in a process cost system as in a job order cost
system.
â All raw materials are debited to Raw Materials when
purchased. All factory labor is debited to Factory Labor
when the labor costs are incurred. Overhead costs are
debited to Manufacturing Overhead as they are incurred.
ī§ However, the assignment of the three cost elements to
Work in Process in a process cost system is different
from a job order system.
12. In a process cost system, fewer materials requisition slips
are usually required than in a job order cost system, since
materials are used for processes rather than for specific jobs.
Materials are usually added to production at the beginning of
the first process. However, in subsequent processes, other
materials may be added at various points.
ī§ At Tyler Company, materials are added at the beginning of
each process. The entry to record the materials used is:
Work in Process - Machining
Work in Process - Assembly
Raw Materials Inventory
(To record materials used)
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
Assignment of Manufacturing
Costs: Journal Entries
13. In process costing, as in job order costing, time tickets
may be used to determine the cost of labor assignable to
the production departments. Since labor costs are
assigned to a process rather than a job, the labor cost
chargeable to a process can alternatively be obtained
from the payroll register or departmental payroll
summaries.
ī§ The entry to assign labor costs for Tyler is:
Work in Process - Machining
Work in Process - Assembly
Factory Labor
(To assign factory labor to production)
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
Assignment of Manufacturing
Costs: Journal Entries
14. The objective in assigning overhead in a process cost system is to
allocate the overhead costs to the production departments on an
objective and equitable basis.
That basis is the activity that âdrivesâ or causes the costs. A
primary driver of overhead costs in continuous manufacturing
operations is machine time used, not direct labor. Thus
machine hours are widely used in allocating manufacturing
overhead costs.
ī§ The entry to allocate overhead to Tylerâs processes is:
Work in Process - Machining
Work in Process - Assembly
Manufacturing Overhead
(To assign overhead to production)
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
Assignment of Manufacturing
Costs: Journal Entries
15. At the end of the month, entries are needed to record
âthe cost of the goods transferred from one
processing department to the next,
âthe cost of goods transferred from the last
processing department to Finished Goods
Inventory, and
âthe costs of goods transferred from Finished
Goods Inventory to Cost of Goods Sold.
Assignment of
Manufacturing Costs
16. Work in Process - Assembly
Work in Process - Machining
(To record transfer of units to Assembly Department)
XXXX
XXXX
ī§ These entries for Tyler Company are as follows:
Finished Goods Inventory
Work in Process - Assembly
(To record transfer of units to Finished Goods)
XXXX
XXXX
Cost of Goods Sold
Finished Goods Inventory
(To record cost of units sold)
XXXX
XXXX
Assignment of Manufacturing
Costs: Journal Entries
17. Equivalent Units of
Production
ī§Equivalent units of production measure the work
done during the period, expressed in fully
completed units.
ī§This concept is used to determine the cost per unit
of completed product.
18. Equivalent Units of
Production
There are two methods of computing equivalent
units.
ī§ The weighted-average method is the method
most widely used in practice and will be discussed
next.
ī§ The FIFO method is less frequently used and is
discussed in advanced cost accounting classes.
19. Five Steps in Process Costing
Step 1: Summarize the flow of physical units of
output.
Step 2: Compute output in terms of equivalent units.
Step 3: Compute equivalent unit costs.
Step 4: Summarize total costs to account for.
Step 5: Assign total costs to units completed and to
units in ending work in process inventory.
20. Weighted-average Method
The weighted-average method considers the
degree of completion (weighting) of the units
completed and transferred out and the ending
work in process.
The formula to compute equivalent units of
production is:
Units Completed
and Transferred
Out
Equivalent Units
of Ending Work
in Process
Equivalent Units
of Production
+ =
21. Equivalent Units of Production â
Weighted-Average Method
The weighted-average method . . .
âMakes no distinction between work done in the
prior period and work done in the current period.
âBlends together units and costs from the prior
period and the current period.
4-21
22. Weighted-average Method:
Examples
To better understand this concept of equivalent units,
consider the following two examples:
Example 1: The Blending Departmentâs entire output during the
period consists of ending work in process of 4,000 units which
are 60% complete as to materials, labor, and overhead.
The equivalent units of production for the Blending Department are
therefore 2,400 units (4,000 X 60%).
Example 2: The Packaging Departmentâs output during the period
consists of 10,000 units completed and transferred out, and 5,000
units in ending work in process which are 70% completed.
The equivalent units of production for the Packaging Department
are therefore 13,500 [10,000 + (5,000 X 70%)].
23. Refinements on the
Weighted-average Method
When materials are not added evenly throughout the
processing (such as when all materials are added at
the beginning of a process), Work in Process at the
end of the period will have different completion
percentages for materials and conversion costs
(labor and overhead). Two equivalent unit
computations will then be needed.
24. Refinements on the
Weighted-average Method
The earlier formula used to compute equivalent units
of production can be refined to show the
computations for materials and conversion costs, as
follows:
Units Completed
and Transferred
Out - Materials
Equivalent Units
of Ending Work
in Process -
Materials
Equivalent Units
of Production -
Materials
+ =
Units Completed
and Transferred
Out -
Conversion Costs
Equivalent Units of
Ending Work in
Process -
Conversion Costs
Equivalent Units of
Production -
Conversion Costs
+ =
25. Physical Units (Step 1)
Physical units
Flow of Production
Work in process, beginning 0
Started during current period 35,000
To account for 35,000
Completed and transferred out
during current period 30,000
Work in process, ending (100%/20%) 5,000
Accounted for 35,000
26. Refined Weighted-average
Method: Example
To better understand this refined concept of equivalent
units, consider the following example:
ī§ Kellogg Company makes EggoÂŽ Waffles. Three departments
are used to produce these waffles: Mixing, Baking, and
Freezing & Packaging. The following information relates to
the Mixing Department.
Work in process, June 1
Started into production
Total units
Units transferred out
Work in process, June 30
Total units
Physical Units
100,000
800,000
900,000
700,000
200,000
900,000
Materials
100%
100%
Conversion Costs
70%
60%
Percentage Complete
27. Refined Weighted-average
Method: Example
ī§The previous slide indicates that the beginning work in
process is 100% complete as to material cost and 70%
complete as to conversion costs. In other words, all of the
materials are added at the beginning of the process, while
the conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the
process and are 70% complete at the end of the period.
ī§The units transferred out to the Baking Department are
fully complete as to both materials and conversion costs.
ī§The ending work in process is fully complete as to
materials, but only 60% complete as to conversion costs.
28. Refined Weighted-average
Method: Example
Two equivalent unit computations are therefore
necessary: one for materials and the other for
conversion costs. These computations are shown below:
Units transferred out
Work in process, June 30
200,000 X 100%
200,000 X 60%
Total equivalent units
Materials
700,000
200,000
900,000
Conversion Costs
700,000
120,000
820,000
Equivalent Units
Notice that in computing equivalent units, the beginning
work in process is not part of the formula.
29. Production Cost Report
A production cost report is the key document
used by management to understand the activities
in a department because it shows the production
quantity and cost data related to that department.
For example, in producing EggoÂŽ Waffles, Kellogg
Company would have three production cost reports:
Mixing, Baking, and Freezing & Packaging.
30. Production Cost Report
In order to be ready to complete a production
cost report, the company must perform four
steps:
1. Compute the physical unit flow.
2. Compute the equivalent units of production.
3. Compute unit production costs.
4 .Prepare a cost reconciliation schedule.
As a whole, these four steps make up the
process costing system.
31. Comprehensive Example of
Process Costing
Assumed data for the
Mixing Department at
Kellogg Company for the
month of June are shown on
the next slide. We will use
this information to complete
a production cost report.
32. Comprehensive Example of
Process Costing: Data
Units:
Work in process, June 1
Direct materials: 100% complete
Conversion costs: 70% complete
Units started into production during June
Units completed and transferred out to Baking
Work in process, June 30
Direct materials: 100% complete
Conversion costs: 60% complete
Costs:
Work in process, June 1
Direct materials: 100% complete
Conversion costs: 70% complete
Cost of work in process, June 1
Costs incurred during production in June
Direct materials
Conversion costs
Costs incurred in June
100,000
800,000
700,000
200,000
$ 50,000
35,000
$ 85,000
$400,000
170,000
$570,000
Mixing Department
33. Compute the Physical Unit
Flow (Step 1)
ī§ Physical units are the actual units to be accounted
for during a period, irrespective of any work
performed. Add the units started into production
during the period to the units in process at the
beginning of the period. This amount is referred to
as the total units to be accounted for.
ī§ These units are then accounted for by the output of
the period, which consists of units transferred out
during the period, and any units in process at the end
of the period. This amount is referred to as the total
units accounted for.
34. Compute the Physical Unit
Flow (Step 1)
The flow of physical units for Kellogg Company for
the month of June in the Mixing Department are
shown below:
Illustration 3-14
Units to be accounted for
Work in process, June 1
Started (transferred) into production
Total units
Units accounted for
Completed and transferred out
Work in process, June 30
Total units
Physical Units
100,000
800,000
900,000
700,000
200,000
900,000
Mixing Department
35. Compute Equivalent Units
(Step 2)
ī§ Once the physical flow of the units is established,
it is necessary to measure the Mixing
Departmentâs productivity in terms of equivalent
units of production.
ī§ In the Mixing Department, materials are added at
the beginning of the process. Thus, two
computations of equivalent units are required:
one for materials and one for conversion costs.
36. The equivalent unit computation is as follows:
(Remember that beginning work in process is
ignored in this computation.)
Compute Equivalent Units
(Step 2)
Illustration 3-15
Units transferred out
Work in process, June 30
200,000 X 100%
200,000 X 60%
Total equivalent units
Materials
700,000
200,000
900,000
Conversion Costs
700,000
120,000
820,000
Equivalent Units
37. Compute Unit Production
Costs (Step 3)
ī§ Armed with the knowledge of the equivalent units
of production, we can now compute the unit
production costs. Unit production costs are
costs expressed in terms of equivalent units of
production.
ī§ When equivalent units of production are different
for materials and conversion costs, three unit
costs are computed: (1) materials, (2) conversion,
and (3) total manufacturing.
38. The computation of total materials cost related to
EggoÂŽ Waffles is as follows:
Illustrations 3-16 & 17
Work in process, June 1
Direct materials costs
Costs added to production during June
Direct materials costs
Total materials costs
$ 50,000
400,000
$450,000
Compute Unit Production
Costs (Step 3)
The computation of unit materials cost is as follows:
Total Materials
Cost
Equivalent Units
of Materials
Unit Materials
Cost
ī¸ =
$450,000 900,000 $.50
ī¸ =
39. The computation of total conversion costs is as
follows:
Illustrations 3-18 & 19
Work in process, June 1
Conversion costs
Costs added to production during June
Conversion costs
Total conversion costs
$ 35,000
170,000
$205,000
Compute Unit Production
Costs (Step 3)
The computation of unit conversion cost is as follows:
Total Conversion
Cost
Equivalent Units
of Conversion
Costs
Unit Conversion
Cost
ī¸ =
$205,000 820,000 $.25
ī¸ =
40. Total manufacturing cost per unit is therefore
computed as follows:
Illustration 3-20
Compute Unit Production
Costs (Step 3)
Unit Materials
Cost
Unit Conversion
Costs
Total
Manufacturing
Cost per Unit
+ =
$.50 .25 $.75
+ =
41. Prepare a Cost Reconciliation
Schedule (Step 4)
We are now ready to determine the cost of goods
transferred out of the Mixing Department to the
Baking Department and the costs in ending work
in process.
The total costs that were charged to the Mixing
Department in June are as follows:
Costs to be accounted for
Work in process, June 1
Started into production
Total costs
$ 85,000
570,000
$655,000
Illustration 3-21
42. The total costs charged to the Mixing Department in
June are therefore $655,000.
A cost reconciliation schedule is then prepared to
assign these costs to (1) units transferred out to the
Baking Department and (2) ending work in process.
Illustration 3-22
Prepare a Cost Reconciliation
Schedule (Step 4)
Costs accounted for
Transferred out (700,000 x $.75)
Work in process, June 30
Materials (200,000 x $.50)
Conversion costs (120,000 x $.25)
Total costs
Mixing Department
Cost Reconciliation Schedule
$100,000
30,000
$525,000
130,000
$655,000
43. Prepare a Cost Reconciliation
Schedule (Step 4)
ī§ The total manufacturing cost per unit of $.75 is
used in costing the units completed and transferred to
the Baking Department.
ī§ In contrast, the unit cost of materials and the unit
cost of conversion are needed in costing units in
process.
The cost reconciliation schedule shows that the
total costs accounted for equal the total costs to
be accounted for.
44. Preparing the Production
Cost Report
ī§ At this point, we are ready to prepare the production
cost report for the Mixing Department.
ī§ As indicated earlier, this report is an internal
document for management that shows production
quantity and cost data for a production department.
ī§ The production cost report for the Mixing
Department is shown on the next two slides. The
four steps in preparing the report are highlighted.
Production
Cost Report
45. Mixing Department
Production Cost Report
For the Month Ended June 30, 1999
Illustration 3-23a
QUANTITIES
Units to be accounted for
Work in process, June 1
Started into production
Total units
Units accounted for
Transferred out
Work in process, June 30
Total Units
Materials
700,000
200,000
900,000
Conversion Costs
700,000
120,000
820,000
Equivalent Units
Step 2
Physical Units
Step 1
100,000
800,000
900,000
700,000
200,000
900,000
46. Mixing Department
Production Cost Report
For the Month Ended June 30, 1999
Illustration 3-23b
COSTS
Units costs Step 3
Costs in June
Equivalent units
Unit costs (a) ī¸ (b)
Costs to be accounted for
Work in process, June 1
Started into production
Total costs
Materials
(a) $450,000
(b) 900,000
$.50
Conversion
Costs
$205,000
820,000
$.25
Total
$655,000
$.75
Cost Reconciliation Schedule Step 4
Costs accounted for
Transferred out (700,000 x $.75)
Work in process, June 30
Materials (200,000 x $.50)
Conversion costs (120,000 x $.25)
Total costs
$100,000
30,000
$ 85,000
570,000
$655,000
$525,000
130,000
$655,000
47. Production Cost Report
ī§ Production cost reports provide a basis for
evaluating the productivity of a department.
ī§ In addition, the cost data can be used to assess
whether unit costs and total costs are
reasonable.
ī§ When the quantity and cost data are compared
with predetermined goals, top management
can also ascertain whether current
performance is meeting planned objectives.
48. Final Comments
ī§ Companies often use a combination of a process cost
and a job order cost system, called operations
costing.
ī§ Operations costing is similar to process costing in
that standardized methods are used to manufacture
the product.
ī§ At the same time, the product may have some
customized, individual features that require the use of
a job order cost system.
ī§ A cost-benefit tradeoff occurs as a company decides
which costing system to use.