Little Folks, Different Strokes (Pediatric Cataracts: Anesthesia, Anatomy, Surgery)
Denunciar
Compartilhar
Alvina Pauline Santiago, MDSection Chief, Paediatric Ophthalmology at Department of Ophthalmology, Philippine General Hospital em Sentro Oftalmologico Jose Rizal, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences
Seguir
•4 gostaram•1,282 visualizações
1 de 48
Little Folks, Different Strokes (Pediatric Cataracts: Anesthesia, Anatomy, Surgery)
2015 Postgraduate Course, St. Luke's Medical Center, August 29, 2015
Alvina Pauline Santiago, MDSection Chief, Paediatric Ophthalmology at Department of Ophthalmology, Philippine General Hospital em Sentro Oftalmologico Jose Rizal, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences
4. Problems
• Amblyopia
• Reopacification of
ocular media
• Anisometropia
• Aneisokonia
• Propensity for
inflammation
• Different anatomy
• Growing eyeball
• Changing refraction
ME Wilson et al. 2012
6. General Anesthesia: Preop Preparation
• NPO 6 hours
• now clear liquids 2-3 h before surgery
• Better parent acceptance
• Less patient anxiety
Dancy LS, Wallace CT, In Wilson et al 2005 Pediatric Cataract Surgery.
7. General Anesthesia: Adequate Depth
Laryngeal mask
Endotracheal Tube
Intramuscular /
Intravenous sedation
e.g. ketamine, propofol
• Lower vitreous pressure
• Less Bell’s Phenomenon
9. ANATOMY
• Pupil
• Cornea with reduced rigidity
• Thin sclera with reduced rigidity
• Anterior capsule elastic
• No hard nucleus
• Increased vitreous pressure
10. Pediatric Pupil
• Newborn to first year of life miotic
• Dilates poorly
• Too much dilating drops in leaky
blood ocular barrier = corneal haze
• Poorly developed dilator muscle
• Superviscous and viscous cohesive
OVD adjunct to mydriasis.
11. SURGERY: INCISION
• Corneal tunnel
– Conjunctiva undisturbed
– Near the limbus for maximum healing
– Sutured with 10-0 synthetic absorbable
• Scleral tunnel
– 2-2.5mm from the limbus into clear cornea
– Preferred for rigid IOL
– Enlarged for IOL
– Sutured with 9-0 synthetic absorbable
ME Wilson et al. Cataract Surgery in Children, Trends and Controversies.
http://www.aapos.org/client_data/files/2012/479_wilsonhandout.pdf Accessed August 23, 2015.
http://www.reviewofophthalmology.com/
http://www.feather.co.jp
12. SURGERY: LOCATION OF INCISION
• Superior incision
– Wound protected by upper lid and Bell’s
– Deep set orbits and overhanging brows not
factors
– Flat nose bridge makes it easier
• Temporal incision
– More space (just like adults)
– But easily traumatized in children
– Patients w against the rule astigmatism ?
– Achieve preoperative astigmatism in 1 month
regardless
ME Wilson et al. Cataract Surgery in Children, Trends and Controversies.
http://www.aapos.org/client_data/files/2012/479_wilsonhandout.pdf Accessed August 23, 2015.
13. Tunnel Incisions
• Do not self seal in children
– Children less than 11, not water tight
– Especially if combined with anterior vitrectomy
– Low corneoscleral rigidity
Basti S, Krishnamachary M, Gupta S. Results of sutureless wound construction in children undergoing cataract extraction. J POS
1996;l33:52-54
http://www.eyeworld.org
14. SURGERY
• Anterior chamber collapse
– Create snug fit for instruments
– Bimanual AC former and separate
aspiration if available
– appropriate gauge MVR blade
– High irrigation setting
ME Wilson et al. Cataract Surgery in Children, Trends and Controversies.
http://www.aapos.org/client_data/files/2012/479_wilsonhandout.pdf Accessed August 23, 2015.
15. SURGERY: ANTERIOR CAPSULORHEXIS
• Highly elastic Anterior Capsule
• Staining the AC: ICG, Trypan Blue
• High viscosity of OVD
• Flatten the anterior capsule
• Leading with a cystotome
• Capsulorrhexis: CCC
ME Wilson et al. Cataract Surgery in Children, Trends and Controversies.
http://www.aapos.org/client_data/files/2012/479_wilsonhandout.pdf Accessed August 23, 2015.
http://i.ytimg.com
16. Alternatives to
Continuous Circular Capsulorrhexis
• Nischal’s Push-pull
technique
• Vitrectorrhexis
• Use of radiofrequency
• Cut edge in very young
children remains smooth
because of capsule
elasticity
• In slightly older children,
the vitrector creates a
slightly scalloped edge
• dissecting microscope
and scanning electron
microscope have shown
that the scallops roll
outward to leave a
smooth edge.
ME Wilson et al. Cataract Surgery in Children, Trends and Controversies.
http://www.aapos.org/client_data/files/2012/479_wilsonhandout.pdf Accessed August 23, 2015.
http://www.medicalmedia.co.il
17. Vitrectorrhexis
• Venturi pump preferred over peristaltic pump
• Separate infusion port
• Snug fit of instruments
• MVRs
• AC maintainer
• No need for cystotome
• Cut rate 150-300/min
• Size smaller than optic
ME Wilson et al. Cataract Surgery in Children, Trends and Controversies.
http://www.aapos.org/client_data/files/2012/479_wilsonhandout.pdf Accessed August 23, 2015.
18. The Anterior Capsulorrhexis
• CCC (preferred > 4 years)
– Heavier viscoelastics
– Runaway rhexis common
– Done well: most resistant to tear
• Vitrectorrhexis (< 4 years)
– Easier to perform
– Next best in terms of resistance
– Runaway less common
• Radiofrequency (any age)
– Similar to vitrectorrhexis in advantage
ME Wilson et al 2012
19. SURGERY: HYDRODISSECT?
• Advantages
– Overall reduction in operative time
– Less irrigating solution used
– Facilitation of lens removal
• Vasavada AR, Trivedi RH, Apple DJ, et al. Randomized, clinical trial of multiquadrant
hydrodissection in pedia- tric cataract surgery. AJO. 2003;135:84-88
• Disadvantages
– Extension of tears if not CCC
– PC rupture in posterior lenticonus and
posterior polar cataracts
ME Wilson et al. Cataract Surgery in Children, Trends and Controversies.
http://www.aapos.org/client_data/files/2012/479_wilsonhandout.pdf Accessed August 23, 2015.
20. SURGERY: LENS REMOVAL
• Soft nucleus/cortex but gummy
• Aspiration for most
• Occasional bursts for ‘gummy”
lens material
ME Wilson et al. Cataract Surgery in Children, Trends and Controversies.
http://www.aapos.org/client_data/files/2012/479_wilsonhandout.pdf Accessed August 23, 2015.
21. SURGERY: POSTERIOR CAPSULE & VITREOUS
• Primary posterior capsulotomy & small
anterior vitrectomy
– Reduce need for 2nd surgery
– Visual axis clearer, longer
– Nd:Yag difficult in pediatric age group
• Disadvantages
– Vitreous violated
– More surgery, more inflammation
– Does not guarantee prevention of
reopacification
ME Wilson et al. Cataract Surgery in Children, Trends and Controversies.
http://www.aapos.org/client_data/files/2012/479_wilsonhandout.pdf Accessed August 23, 2015.
Mousa HG. Slideshare.net
22. General Rules
<5
• Primary posterior capsulotomy
• Vitrectomy
5-8
• Primary posterior capsulotomy
• With or without vitrectomy
>8
• Intact posterior capsule
ME Wilson et al. Cataract Surgery in Children, Trends and Controversies.
http://www.aapos.org/client_data/files/2012/479_wilsonhandout.pdf Accessed August 23, 2015.
23. SURGERY: VITRECTOMY APPROACH
• Anterior Chamber
– Tilts the IOL
• Pars plana/plicata
– Preserves IOL position
– Pars plana varies
– Risk of dialysis and retinal
detachment
25. The Pediatric Pars Plana
Age Nasal Temporal
< 6 mos 2.2 mm 2.5 mm
6-12 mos 2.7 3.0
1-2 yrs 3.0 3.1
2-6 yrs 3.2 3.8
• Temporal ciliary body longer than nasal
Aiello AL, Tran VT, Rao NA, 1992
26. The Pediatric Pars Plana & Sclerotomy site
Pediatric Pars Plana
Age Nasal Temporal
< 6 mos 2.2 mm 2.5 mm
6-12
mos
2.7 3.0
1-2 yrs 3.0 3.1
2-6 yrs 3.2 3.8
Sclerotomy Site
Aiello AL, Tran VT, Rao NA, 1992
Age Trivedi &
Wilson
< 1 yr </= 2mm
1-4 y 2.5
>4 y 3.0
2-6 yrs 3.2
Trivedi and Wilson 2005, in Wilson et al
Pediatric Cataract Surgery
27. Pars Plana Growth
• Most
rapid
growth
26-35
wks
• 1.87mm
• (0.9-
2.8mm)
40
wks
> 3 mm
62
wks
PPV safe only after
62 wks post conception?
Trivedi and Wilson 2005, in Wilson et al
Pediatric Cataract Surgery
28. Nd:YAG in the OR
• Reopacification rate high
• Especially if unable to treat
anterior vitreous face
• Cost
• Availability of YAG laser
mounted on operative
microscope
• Need for general anesthesia
Trivedi and Wilson 2005, in Wilson et al
Pediatric Cataract Surgery
Photo fr. Wilson ME
29. RESPECT FOR THE VITREOUS
• Nick the PC with a needle cystotome
• Push vitreous with heavy viscoelastic
• Proceed with PCCC or vitrectorrhexis
• Leave vitreous intact
• May or may not aspirate OVD
30. SURGERY: PRIMARY IOL ISSUES
• Age
• To implant or not to implant?
• IOL formula to use?
• Target refraction
• Type of IOL to use
• IOL placement?
31. SURGERY: PRIMARY IOL ISSUE: AGE
• “General consensus IOL for most
older children
• IOL implantation during the first
year of life still questioned
• 6 mos or younger: CAUTION
Wilson 1996
Trivedi et al 2004
Infant Aphakia Treatment Study Group 2010
32. Minimize Calculation Errors
• Get a good keratometry
reading
• Get a good axial length
determination
• Get a good ultrasound
• Get a good biometry
• Even if you have to put the
patient under general
anesthesia
http://www.aitindustries.com
33. SURGERY: PRIMARY IOL ISSUE: IOL FORMULA
IOL
Power
SRKII
SRK-T Holladay
HofferQ
ACCURACY?
34. Accuracy of IOL Formulas
• 4 formulas studied: SRK II, SRK-T, Holladay, HofferQ
• No significant difference in accuracy
• Average postop error 1.2-1.4D in all formulas
• high degree of variability
– SRK II being the least variable
– Hoffer Q being the most variable,
– particularly among the youngest group of children with the
axial lengths less than 19 mm
NeelyDE, PlagerDA, BorgerSM, GolubRL. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in infants and children
undergoing cataract surgery. J AAPOS. 2005;9(2)160–165.
Andreo LK, Wilson ME, Saunders RA. Predictive value of regression and theoretical IOL formula in pediatric intraouclar lens
implantation. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1997; 34: 240-243..
35. Accuracy of IOL Formulas
Prediction Error vs. Desired Refraction
Age at Surgery
Axial Length
NeelyDE, PlagerDA, BorgerSM, GolubRL. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in infants and children
undergoing cataract surgery. J AAPOS. 2005;9(2)160–165.
36. SURGERY: PRIMARY IOL ISSUE: TARGET REFRACTION
• Emmetropia in early childhood
– Myopic shift
– Less anisometropia
• Hyperopia
– Mild to Moderate for ages 2-8 years
– Amblyogenic
– Less problems with myopic shift
ME Wilson et al. Cataract Surgery in Children, Trends and Controversies.
http://www.aapos.org/client_data/files/2012/479_wilsonhandout.pdf Accessed August 23, 2015.
37. IOL Power Selection
AGE (Years) Target
Refraction
7 0 to +0.50
6 +1.00
5 +2.00
4 +3.00
3 +4.00
2 +5.00
Weigh:
• Refraction of other eye
• Risk of amblyopia
• Ease of management of
induced anisometropia
38. SURGERY: PRIMARY IOL ISSUE: IOL PLACEMENT
• In-the-bag (e.g. ALCON SN60 IQ,
Rayner Cflex IOL)
• Sulcus placement
– PMMA avoids decentration (e.g. ALCON
MC 60-BM)
– Rayner Cflex IOL
– 3 pc foldable acrylic (e.g.) Acrysof MA 60
• Attempt optic capture through AC +/- PC
• Haptic in Sulcus, IOL Optic Capture
thru PCC
ME Wilson et al 2012, Faramarzi et al 2009,
http://www.eye.uci.edu/pix/cataractsurger
y.jpg
39. SURGERY: PRIMARY IOL ISSUE: IOL MATERIAL
ALCON Acrysof PMMA
ME Wilson et al 2012
• Proliferative
• Progress more slowly
• Less visually significant
• 2nd surgery less likely
• If Nd:YAG single
sessions
• Fibrous
• Progress faster
• More visually significant
• 2nd surgery likely
• Reopacification =
repeated Nd:YAG
40. Multifocal & Accommodating IOL
• Not recommended when a primary
posterior capsulotomy and vitrectomy done
• 2 or more images formed at the retina:
immature visual system will choose 1;
alternating vision between near image or
distant image
• Loss of contrast sensitivity
• Eye growth and amblyopia
• Myopia with eye growth
• Deserves further study at this time
ME Wilson et al. Cataract Surgery in Children, Trends and Controversies.
http://www.aapos.org/client_data/files/2012/479_wilsonhandout.pdf Accessed August 23, 2015.
41. SURGERY: SECONDARY IOL PLACEMENT?
Majority of patients with Primary Posterior
Capsulotomy and anterior vitrectomy
• In the bag PCIOL: reopen bag, viscodissection
• Sulcus PCIOL: PMMA vs 3-pc acrylic
• ACIOL
– 3 pc acrylic transpupillary capture of IOL, haptics in
sulcus
– Artisan lens
• Retropupillary fixation of Iris Fixated IOL (Mohr)
• Transcleral?? As a last resort???
Wilson et al 2012, Wilson et al 2009, Trivedi et al 2005, Wilson et al 2011, Buckley 2007
42. Transcleral Sutured IOL
• Age dependent myopic shift
• 3/33 subluxed IOL
– 10-0 prolene suture spontaneous breakage
• 3.5, 8, 9 years
– Survey of 10 pediatric ophthalmologist:
• 10 cases at average 5 years
Buckley EG. Hanging by a thread: the long-term efficacy and safety of transcleral sutured IOL in children (an
AOS thesis). Trans AOS. 2007;105:294-311
43. Transcleral Sutured IOL
Buckley EG. Hanging by a thread: the long-term efficacy and safety of transcleral sutured IOL in children (an
AOS thesis). Trans AOS. 2007;105:294-311
Conclusion
• appears to be a safe and effective
procedure
• provided that the suture material
used is stable enough to resist
significant degradation over time.
• caution with 10-0 polypropylene
suture
• an alternative material or size
should be considered.http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net
44. MY PREFERENCE
• Incision corneal, near limbus
• Anterior capsulotomy CCC or vitrectorrhexis
• Lens removal no hydrodissection, no hydrodelineation
• Posterior capsule primary capsulotomy if no IOL
• Vitreous preserve whenever possible
Patient
Surgery
Visual
Rehab
45. When I can’t do biometry:
Axial Length from UTZ
• Capozzi P, et al. Corneal curvature and axial length
values in children with congenital infantile cataract in
the first 42 months of life. Investigative Ophthalmol Vis
Sci 2008; 49: 11. 4774-4778.
• Trivedi RH, Wilson M. Keratometry in Pediatric Eyes
With Cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(1):38-42.
doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2007.22.
• Gordon RA, Donzis PB. Refractive development of the
human eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:785-789
47. One hundred years from now,
It doesn’t matter what kind of house I lived in,
How much money I had,
What positions I held,
Or what my clothes were like.
But the world may be a little better,
Because I was important in the life of a child.
-Anonymous
48. References
1. ME Wilson et al. Cataract Surgery in Children, Trends and Controversies. http://www.aapos.org/client_data/files/2012/479_wilsonhandout.pdf
Accessed August 23, 2015.
2. Vasavada AR, Trivedi RH, Apple DJ, et al. Randomized, clinical trial of multiquadrant hydrodissection in pedia- tric cataract surgery. AJO. 2003;135:84-
88
3. Basti S, Krishnamachary M, Gupta S. Results of sutureless wound construction in children undergoing cataract extraction. J POS 1996;l33:52-
54
4. BuckleyEG.Hangingbyathread:thelong-termefficacy and safety of transcleral sutured IOL in children (an AOS thesis). Trans
AOS. 2007;105:294-311
5. Infant Aphakia Treatment Study Group. A randomized clini- cal trial comparing contact lens with intraocular lens correction
of monocular aphakia during infancy: grating acuity and adverse events at age 1 year. Arch Oph- thalmol. 2010;128:810-8.
6. Faramarzi A, Javadi MA. Comparison of 2 techniques of intraocular lens implantation in pediatric cataract sur- gery. J
Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1040-5. WilsonMEJr,EnglertJA,GreenwaldMJ.In-the-bagsec- ondary intraocular lens
implantation in children. J AAPOS. 1999;3:350-5
7. TrivediRH,WilsonME,FaccianiJ.Secondaryintraocular lens implantation for pediatric aphakia. J AAPOS 2005;9:346-52
8. WilsonME,HafezGA,TrivediRH.Secondaryin-the-bag IOL implantation in children who have been aphakic since early infancy. J
AAPOS 2011;15:162-6
9. Andreo LK, Wilson ME, Saunders RA. Predictive value of regression and theoretical IOL formula in pediatric intraouclar lens
implantation. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1997; 34: 240-243..
10. NeelyDE, PlagerDA, BorgerSM, GolubRL. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in infants and children undergoing cataract
surgery. J AAPOS. 2005;9(2)160–165.
11. Moore DB, Zion IB, Neely et al. Accuracy of biometry in pediatric cataract extraction with primary intraocular lens
implantation. J Cat Refract Surg 2008; 34 (11): 1940-1947.
12. Wilson ME, Trivedi RH, Pandey SK. Pediatric Cataract Surgery, Techniques, Complications and Management. PA, Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
13. Aiello AL, Tran VT, Rao NA. Postnatal development of the ciliary body and pars plana. A morphometric study in childhood.
Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110: 802-805.