O slideshow foi denunciado.
Seu SlideShare está sendo baixado. ×

Organizational Change

Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
By
Ahmad Alkhathami
Academic Prep
ELS Language Center
Jerry Schmuki
June 12, 2008
Introduction
With the passage of time, the competition among business companies has extended
more and more, resulted from ...
The necessity of change
The economy is very sensitive to change. Numerous factors affect the economy, such
as politics, sc...
Anúncio
Anúncio
Próximos SlideShares
Managing change-and-innovation
Managing change-and-innovation
Carregando em…3
×

Confira estes a seguir

1 de 12 Anúncio

Mais Conteúdo rRelacionado

Diapositivos para si (20)

Quem viu também gostou (19)

Anúncio

Semelhante a Organizational Change (20)

Organizational Change

  1. 1. By Ahmad Alkhathami Academic Prep ELS Language Center Jerry Schmuki June 12, 2008
  2. 2. Introduction With the passage of time, the competition among business companies has extended more and more, resulted from the deregulation rules that countries have started to adopt and the increase of knowledge and experience of developing products and services. Hence, the concept of organizational change becomes a main concern of all organizations that want to success and survive in the middle of hard competition. This change requires professional skills of creativity and innovation for both leaders and employees since that change is going to set up new methods of work. This paper considers the organizational change related to business organizations that produce products or services. It will consider the necessity of change, and adopt the three factors that each organization must consider to go through successful change which are the challenges of change, the methods of change, and the role of both leaders and employees to achieve the satisfactory change. Thereby, organization will be able to stand in front of any fluctuations in the market. 2
  3. 3. The necessity of change The economy is very sensitive to change. Numerous factors affect the economy, such as politics, science and research, human behavior, and even natural phenomena. However, over the last few decades, new factors have appeared on the surface and have effects on business organizations and their ability to overcome the challenges that come with any rapid change of the markets. The main factors that stand behind the importance of change in organizations are:1 1- Globalization causes a rapid change of the business environmental conditions, such as the ability to set up a business in new markets and the increase in the number of competitors in one market with the same kind of brands but absolutely different in quality. 2- The variation of customer needs with the rapid change of life style and the economical and social circumstances of the future are very significant. 3- The hard competition in producing new innovative products can eliminate other products due to their high quality and low prices, which attract customers to these new products and leave the old ones behind. 4- The change in the marketing rules is also a key factor. Many countries applied the deregulation on their market and assimilate the global economy which facilitates the market to receive more international companies to establish their business in the local market. These procedures have alerted the companies to start searching for new ways to deal with the new environment of business and face strong competition. 1 David Nadler, Robert Shaw, A Elise Walton, and Associates. “Discontinues Change, Leading Organizational Transformation”. (p 3-9) 3
  4. 4. 5- There is a decrease in the benefits with the increase in costs that push the organizations to initiate and treat these problems as soon as possible. The challenges of change: Some people think that change in any unit or process in the organization is easy. However, organizational change is one of the most difficult tasks of leadership in any organization. In other words, it is more difficult than founding a new organization. In this task, the leader not only needs to change the vision and some of the company’s objectives, but also he/she needs to develop a very professional strategy to change what has been existing for ages of work approaches and processes. Sometimes, the required change reaches the values and the behaviors of the employees which is what psychologists describe as the greatest scheme. The challenge that we must consider first is the humans’ attitude toward change. In fact, resisting change is part of human nature, especially in the work environment. People are afraid of changing what they used to do for long periods of time, due to the fact that change means they have to do something new, which means they expect failure in their tasks; thereby, they will probably lose some benefit of their position. In addition, most employees don’t have any idea about what challenges the company has faced in the market and how this situation puts the company in a risky position unless they move to a better means of production.2 The second challenge is that the change needs to unify the efforts of the employees since nobody can achieve the required change alone. Therefore, the change needs to build 2 David Nadler, Robert Shaw, A Elise Walton, and Associates. “Discontinues Change, Leading Organizational Transformation”. (p 48) 4
  5. 5. homogenous teams under the management of talented leaders who are able to lead them to perfect results. The third one is that the processes of change are not expected to improve smoothly without facing setbacks. This may affect the workers negatively which results weakness in their confidences. The fourth is the full schedule of routine tasks which distract the workers from going through the process of change and accomplish them. The fifth challenge is the need of continuous change. In other words, at the time the organizations finish the process of change, any unit must evaluate the results. Sometimes, the assessors find that these results don’t achieve the goals, or something new has occurred; as a result, they need to set up new processes immediately until they reach their satisfactory results. During that period, the workers productivity probably will drop, or they may give up. The sixth is how the planners of this change give the exact duration of completing all the operations of change, which require skillful leaders who are able to design a strategy with respect to the all circumstances. The last challenge is the prediction of the future. In other words, any plans and actions designed to solve the present problems without clear vision to the future expectations would be wasting of money and time and would impose the organization to start again with new processes, but at that time, the chances of success become lower.3 The methods of organizational change: 3 David Nadler, Robert Shaw, A Elise Walton, and Associates. “Discontinues Change, Leading Organizational Transformation”. (p 194) 5
  6. 6. Before talking about the methods of change in economic organizations, there are three parts of the organization that mostly require change policies:4 1) The organizational processes. In this part, organizations need to improve the quality of any processes in the organization that consequently enhance the production, diminish the costs, and improve the productivity. 2) The organizational structure. This is any way that makes the organization more flexible and achieves a higher performance. 3) The organization culture. This is related to work ethics, workers behavior and values toward the organization loyalty, and it qualifies them for the new approaches of work to keep up with the new technologies that are going to be used. The methods of organizational change which are the most important part of this research will guide the organization to success through change in the strategies and the processes, the work environment such as the work place, new technology, or a change in the work values. Five factors play an important role in actively changing the organization to achieve the new objectives of the company. As much as the company is successful in each of these factors, the company approaches its general objectives. Here are some of the major objectives:5 1- Recognizing the problems and the solutions. All the employees should be involved in this task. That means not only the leaders but others must encourage their employees to do that because they are the closest people who can identify the problems. Furthermore, this action mostly benefits 4 Harvard Business Essential. “Managing Change and Transition”. (p 8-9) 5 Harvard Business Essential. “Managing Change and Transition”. (p 33-45) 6
  7. 7. people when it comes from inside the company and not from the outer consultant. Also, the company must start this process early before any negative results. One example is when the Japanese automobile industry spread in the North American market, due to the high quality and low prices of their products. This caused big damage to the automobile industries in the USA because they didn’t recognize the international development in the automobile industry.6 2- Create a clear vision Diagnosing the problems and the solutions is not enough to start the action. Specifically, leaders need to state a clear vision and strategies to the employees so that it is obvious for them why this change is going on and what the benefits are from all these procedures. Otherwise, most of them will be acting as barriers against the new evolution. Acknowledging that must motivate the workers and show how the results will be useful for the organization and thus for the employees themselves. 3- Professional leadership. The successful change in any organization needs professional leaders who bear the burden of success, especially; when it is known that the change is critical period in the company’s time. 4- Make the change in small stages. Any change aimed at the whole organization as one unit at the same time will not be useful because every stage needs a lot of analyzing and continuous assessing. That requires a big effort which is the next point. 5- Observing the processes of change. 6 David Nadler, Robert Shaw, A Elise Walton, and Associates. “Discontinues Change, Leading Organizational Transformation”. (p27-28) 7
  8. 8. Leaders must evaluate the progress of the change strategy, and any micro-changes in the process need to be observed step by step to quickly overcome all setbacks that appear during the process of change. Otherwise, the company will end up with negative results. The role of the leadership toward organizational change Undoubtedly, business people know how leadership is very important in the success or failure of any organization. This research paper focuses on the role that the leaders play in the battle of change their organizations. Although the leaders are responsible of making the objectives and the strategies of the change, they have very difficult challenges with changing the values and philosophy of work. Furthermore, during the transformation in any process, the duty of the leadership becomes heavier and more critical7 . Therefore, there are five steps that leaders follow in the progress of change. 1- Leaders should be alert to all circumstances that affect the market and assess the situation of their organization during every change on the market. (David Nadler, Robert Shaw, A Elise Walton, and Associates. (1995). “Discontinues Change, Leading Organizational Transformation”. (p194) 2- When the leader states that the organization needs any kind of change in any unit or part of the organization, it is their task to create the vision that expresses the values and the way of the organization to the objectives. After that, they develop the logical strategies that are connected to the organization’s vision. (Harvard Business Essential. (2003) “Managing Change and Transition”. p46) 7 Harvard Business Essential. “Managing Change and Transition” (p 46). 8
  9. 9. 3- Leaders must have the ability to diagnose the problems and the parts of the organization that require improvement and create the suitable solutions at the right time. 4- The most difficult role of the leadership in all these processes is the employees’ reactions toward these changes. In other words, leaders plan a strategy to guide the all workers to the new methods which include the needs of training, eliminating of some processes, or adding new ones. All of these need high motivation from the leaders to their employees. Further, they should be alert to any negative reactions from the workers and solve them directly. As a result, the workers accept any new systems in the work and be willing to share in the development due to the fact that they are the main factor in the action of change. (Harvard Business Essential. (2003) “Managing Change and Transition”. (p18-22) ) Employees’ Roles toward the Change The employees have different attitudes toward change. As mentioned before, some employees take a resistance stand to change for many reasons. However, the role of the employees here is very significant because they are the power that applies strategy and achieves the objectives. Before that, employees must adopt the concepts that represent the change which are:8 1- They have to expect the change any time and to be aware that change is fundamental and necessary in any organization. 8 (Paradigm Shift- Companies and Employees in Change). http://www.going-beyond.dk/uk/paradigm_shift-companies_and_employees_in_change.htm 9
  10. 10. 2- They need to adapt to the new systems directly and be willing to do that any time. As a consequence, the task of the company to change becomes easier, and it will decrease the cost of the change project. However, the change that the company seeks is not only the leaders’ task. Indeed, the employees may be the first who release the necessity of change since they work in the frontline of the company and they are conscious of what the middle and upper leaders can’t recognize. Therefore, there are some actions they should do to share with the other levels of the organization in the successful change. These can be summarized as:9 1) The seeking and giving the information. As they work in the frontlines of production they are the closest people to the challenges, the complaint, or the customers’ needs. Hence, they can be more knowledgeable of what should be done. Therefore, they have the information that can be very important to determine what the organization should consider to improve. 2) Giving suggestions. Since the employees are the most knowledgeable about the micro-process in their workplace, and they know what exactly the problems they face, they will be the most expert about the best solutions. Hence, they have to share in the plans and strategies, and be part of the decision- making group. 3) The share in applying the new strategy effectively and giving always clear feedback. All of these can insure all the company’s units integrate with each other to face any change in the market and to be able to take the right action at the right time. 9 Callies, Letticia, and Miller Venon. “Analysis of Employees’ Recalled Role Negotiation Episodes” 10
  11. 11. Summary Undoubtedly, the need to change has been increasing rapidly, and it is obvious that the recent situation of markets shows the future will be more challenging and critical for business organizations in particular. However, the certain conclusion that can be drawn here is the importance of organizational change that will be achieved when the organization considers all the issues that are related to this change, in both strategic plans and actions, in all periods before, within, and after the procedures of change. Thus, any organization must be alert to the challenge and difficulty of this task, and its requirement are professional leadership and qualified employees. Finally, it becomes compulsory in any organization to include change policies in its strategies and to make the concept (the need to change is endless) part of their vision. . 11
  12. 12. Bibliography 1- Callies, Letticia, and Miller Venon (May, 2003). “Analysis of Employees’ Recalled Role Negotiation Episodes”. Retrieved from the Internet June 10, 2008. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International communication Association, San Diego, California (PDF). 2- David A. Nadler, Robert B. Shaw, A. Elise Walton, and Associates (1995). “Discontinues Change, Leading Organizational Transformation”. San Francisco, California, Jossey- Bass Inc., publishers. 3- Harvard Business Essential (2003). “Managing Change and Transition”. Boston, Massachusetts, Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. 4- (Paradigm Shift-Companies and Employees in Change), August, 2003. Retrieved from the Internet June 10, 2008. http://www.going-beyond.dk/uk/paradigm_shift-companies_and_employees_in_change.htm 12

×