Large trade-in incentives negatively impact the size of upgrade consumers choose. Ownership time has a positive relationship with the size of upgrade consumers choose. Brand loyal consumers upgrade to a larger degree than non-loyal consumers. Advertising magnifies the size of upgrade that brand loyal consumers choose.
Trading on Up: An Examination of Factors Influencing the Degree of Upgrade: Evidence from Cash for Clunkers
1. From:
Factors that Influence Upgrading
Durable Goods at Re-Purchase
A study of vehicle trade-ins
Miller, Wiles, and Park (2019)
2. From:From:
When consumers make a re-purchase, they
can upgrade, downgrade, or remain neutral
depending on how the replacement
purchase compares to the previously owned
good.
Miller, Wiles, and Park (2019)
2010 Honda Accord
MSRP = $21,055
2018 Chevrolet Spark MSRP
= $13,220
2018 Honda Accord
MSRP = $23,570
2018 Acura TSLX
MSRP = $33,000
Replacement
Purchases
Neutral
Trade-in
New Purchase Options
3. From:From:
Trade-in characteristics:
How long the previous product was owned.
Trade-in incentives
New purchase characteristics:
Perceived switching costs: Brand loyalty
Perceived benefits: Characteristics of the new purchase (styling, number of seats, quality
ratings, etc.)
Aspects of the transaction controlled by marketers: Promotional efforts, such as incentives
and advertising.
What influences consumers upgrade
decision?
Miller, Wiles, and Park (2019)
4. From:From:
A study of over 300,000 trade-in transactions from “Cash for
Clunkers”
Data matched with:
Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values
JD Power
Consumer Reports
Gross income
Brand advertising spending
Research study
Miller, Wiles, and Park (2019)
5. From:From:
2010 Honda Accord
MSRP = $21,055
Trade-in
Ownership time
Brand Loyalty
Brand Loyalty x
Advertising
Trade-In
Incentives
Results: What influences upgrading?
Miller, Wiles, and Park (2019)
2018 Chevrolet Spark MSRP
= $13,220
2018 Acura TSLX
MSRP = $33,000
Upgrade
Downgrade
Relationships
6. From:From:
Ownership time: As ownership becomes exceedingly long,
consumers build up a positive mental account balance that they
feel they can use to splurge in the next purchase. Thus, as
consumers use their previously owned durable goods for longer,
they upgrade to a larger degree.
Brand loyalty: Brand loyal consumers upgrade a larger degree
than non-loyal consumers.
Brand loyalty x advertising: Advertising spending magnifies the
degree of upgrade that brand loyal consumers choose.
Trade-in incentives: When trade-in incentives become much larger
than what the trade-in is worth, consumers save the extra money
and downgrade.
Results
Miller, Wiles, and Park (2019)
7. From:From:
Although researchers have shown trade-in incentives accelerate replacement
purchases, managers should be hesitant to use them for two reasons.
1. Consumers view large trade-in incentives as assets that they prefer to keep
rather than spend. Thus, they upgrade to a lesser degree than with small trade-in
incentives.
2. Trade-in incentives shorten ownership time (by accelerating a repurchase) and
thus negate the positive impact of ownership time on upgrading.
Firms can use ownership time as a segmentation variable to identify consumers
who will be more inclined to upgrade.
Firms should maximize their efforts to create brand loyalty within their customer
base because these consumers tend to upgrade more.
Further, if firms can find additional ways to advertise to loyal customers they can
magnify the size of the loyal customers’ upgrade.
Recommendations
Miller, Wiles, and Park (2019)
Editor's Notes
Consumers have many options in the marketplace for replacing the durable goods that they own. This not only occurs in the automotive industry (the context of our study), but also occurs when consumers buy cell phones, mattresses, computers, furniture, etc.
As a result, when consumers go to replace a durable good, they may choose to buy a product that is better (an upgrade), the same (neutral), or worse than (a downgrade) in comparison to the product they currently own.
In this study, we measured upgrade in terms of the change in spending (New purchase spending – Previous purchase spending).
In our research, we investigate the factors that impact upgrading. We account many factors but we focus on (1) aspects of the trade-in that impact upgrading behavior and (2) how aspects of the new purchase that impact switching costs impact upgrading behavior.
For the trade-in, we are interested in:
Ownership time – as ownership time increases, consumers feel as though they get more value from the trade-in and their mental account value for the object depreciates. How does ownership time impact upgrading behavior.
Trade-in value (or windfall) – some firms give trade-in incentives. Specifically, they pay a consumer for their trade-in. How do trade-in incentives that exceed the value of the trade-in impact upgrading behavior?
For the new vehicle, we are interested in:
Loyalty - how does brand loyalty impact consumer upgrading behavior?
Advertisings moderating impact – how does advertising spending impact the relationship between loyalty and upgrading behavior?
Note: this paper also has three replications:
Secondary dealer dataset
Experimental replication #1
Tested differences in new purchase incentives and trade-in incentives.
Experimental replication #2
Tested mental accounting (consumers preference to save large trade-in incentives) mediation.
Relationships
1. Ownership time - As ownership becomes exceedingly long, consumers build up a positive mental account balance that they feel they can use to splurge in the next purchase. Thus, as consumers use their previously owned durable goods for longer, they upgrade to a larger degree.
2. Loyalty - Brand loyal consumer upgrade a larger degree than non-loyal consumers.
3. Loyalty x Advertising – Advertising spending magnifies the degree of upgrade that brand loyal consumers choose.
4. Trade-in incentives – When trade-in incentives become much larger than what the trade-in is worth, consumers save the extra money and downgrade (experiments and