O slideshow foi denunciado.
Seu SlideShare está sendo baixado. ×

editedfloatingsolarpv-171002135444 (1).pptx

Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Próximos SlideShares
Floating solar ppt
Floating solar ppt
Carregando em…3
×

Confira estes a seguir

1 de 20 Anúncio

Mais Conteúdo rRelacionado

Semelhante a editedfloatingsolarpv-171002135444 (1).pptx (20)

Anúncio

Mais recentes (20)

editedfloatingsolarpv-171002135444 (1).pptx

  1. 1. MAULANA AZAD NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FLOATING SOLAR PV SPEAKER: VIKAS PANCHAL 162118219 ENERGY DEPARTMENT
  2. 2. CONTENTS • UNDERSTANDING FLOATING SOLAR PV • NEED FOR FLOATING PV • COMPONENTS OF PV SYSTEM • PV FLOATING PLANTS OUTLINE • ADVANTAGES • PLACES OF INSTALLATION • FLOATING POWER PLANT ECONOMICANALYSIS • SOLAR PV INSTALLED COUNTRIES • REFERENCES
  3. 3. What is floating solar PV? UNDER STANDING SOLARPV
  4. 4. It is a technique of installing PV on water bodies instead of conventional place like land or rooftops.
  5. 5. NEED FOR FLOATING PV • Solar photovoltaic (PV) installation has the burden of intense land requirements, installing solar PV on water bodies can resolve this issue. FIG: MUMBAI CITY ELEVATION VIEW
  6. 6. COMPONENTS OF PV SYSTEM • PONTOON • FLOATS • MOORING SYSTEM • SOLAR PV MODULE • CABLES AND CONNECTORS • FLOATING STRUCTURE
  7. 7. PONTOON: A pontoon is flotation device with buoyancy enough to float by itself as well as with a heavy load. FLOATS: Multiple plastic hollow floats with effective buoyancy to self weight ratio are combined over and over again, forming a giant pontoon.
  8. 8. MOORING SYSTEM: A mooring system is an permanent structure which keeps the floating panels on same position and prevent them from turning or floating away. Usually mooring system platforms can be done by using nylon rope slings.
  9. 9. SOLAR PV MODULE: Standard polycrystalline solar PV modules have been used for the floating solar systems. In salty water bodies “Standard Aluminium Frames and Mounts” are proposed due to fast degradation of metals on salty water.
  10. 10. CABLES AND CONNECTORS: • Electricity is drawn from the solar array and transported to the land. • the power can be fed to the grid or stored in batteries • High temperature resistance, water proof and robust cables are to be used to provide a long service
  11. 11. FLOATING STRUCTURE  FTCC: • The system consists of a raft supporting standard photovoltaic panels • The Floating Tracker Cooling Concentrator (FTCC) uses reflectors to increase the efficiency. • The FTCC also uses water to help stay cool, reduce costs to about 20% less than conventional land. • FTCC is Design in SIT –Italy.  Submerged photovoltaic solar panel • In this configuration the panels are immersed in water and this allows us to realize a gain in efficiency in summers due to cooling effect. • Designed by Infratech Industries Inc., Australia.
  12. 12. SUNdy concept the hexagonal design • This design consists of a series of thin film PV panels connected together and then onto the electrical bus lines running through the hexagonal vertices. • The panels themselves are envisaged to be laminated and adhered to a flexible foam surface, which gives the panel's buoyancy and structure • At the edge of the float is embedded a marine grade connector, which allows the panels to be connected both mechanically and electrically. Flexible floating hexagonal PV Design, SUNdy concept.
  13. 13.  HYDRELIO Floating solar component • The latest floating structure are installed at Nishihira and Higashihira Ponds in Kato City is the work of Kyocera Corporation and Century Tokyo Leasing Corporation. • They are designed typhoon- proof (due to their sturdy, high-density polyethylene and array design).
  14. 14. PV FLOATING PLANTS OUTLINE
  15. 15. ADVANTAGES 1.They reduce reservoir water evaporation and algae growth by shading the water. 2.Floating platforms are 100% recyclable, utilizing high- density polyethylene, which can withstand ultraviolet rays and resists corrosion. 3.Floating solar power generating systems typically generate more electricity than ground-mount and rooftop systems due to the cooling effect of the water. 4.The floating platforms are designed and engineered to withstand extreme physical stress, including typhoon and storm conditions. 5. More module install compare with the other system.
  16. 16. VARIOUS INSTALLATION PLACES FIG: OFF SHORE PV INSTALLATION FIG: RIVER PV INSTALLATION
  17. 17. SOLAR PV INSTALLED COUNTRIES S NO COMPANY NAME CAPACITY LOCATION 1 Kyocera TCL solar 2.3MW Hyogo prefecture, western Japan 2 Kyocera TCL solar 1.7MW Hyogo prefecture, western Japan 3 Kyocera TCL solar 1.2MW Hyogo prefecture, western Japan 4 SPG Solar 175KW Napa valley's Far Niente Wineries, California, (US) 5 National institute of advanced industrial science &technology 20KW Aichi, Japan 6 Bryo 500KW Bubano, Italy 7 Tera Moretti Holding 200KW Petra Winery, Italy 8 D.A.I.E.T 20KW Avetrana, Italy 9 ENERACTIVE 112KW New Jersey(US)
  18. 18. INDIA AND FLOATING PV • First 10KW floating solar power plant in conceptualized andingeniously implemented at RAJARHAT in KOLKATA. • India is currently making plans to build the world's largest floatingsolar power plant. • The plant is expected to produce 50 MW under NHPC (national hydroelectric power cooperation). • This major project is expected to cost between 64 and 72 million dollars. • It will be set up in bodies of water in the Southern state of Kerala by the National Hydro Power Corporation with technical assistance from MANIT Bhopal
  19. 19. REFERENCES 1. Alok Sahu, Neya Yadav, K Sudhakar .”Floating photovoltaic power plant A review 2016 Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 66(2016)815–824 2. Syahriman Mohd, Azmia Mohd, Othmana Mohd Yusof Hj, Ruslanb Mohd Hafidz Hj, Sopianb Kamaruzzaman, Abdul Majid cZafriAzran. Studyonelec- trical power output of floating photo voltaic and conventional photovoltaic. AIP Conf. Proc. 2013;1571:95.http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4858636 3. Rahman MM,Hasanuzzaman M, Rahim NA.Effects of various parameters on PV-module power and efficiency. Energy Convers Manag 2015;103:348–58. 4. Shukla KN, Rangnekar Saroj, SudhakarK. A comparative study of exergetic performance of amorphous and polycrystalline solar P V modules. Int JExergy 2015;17(4):433–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEX.2015.071559. 5. Sudhakar K,SrivastavaTulika.Energyandenergyanalysisof36Wsolar photovoltaicmodule.IntJAmbientEnergy2013;2(1):31–4. 6. Designparametersof10KW floating solarpowerplant,vol.2,SpecialIssue1; May 2015.

×