4. PoDs :
Attributes or benefits that
customers strongly
associate with a brand
Positively evaluated
Belief that they cannot find
to the same extent with a
competitive brand
5. Three criteria to determine whether
an attribute can function as a
POINT OF DIFFERENCE:
7. PoPs :
Attributes that are not
necessarily unique to the
brand
Attributes are shared with
other brands
Types – Competitive and
Category
8. CATEGORY POINTS OF PARITY
Attributes that consumers view as essential to
a legitimate and credible offering within a
certain product/service
COMPETITIVE POINTS OF PARITY
Attributes that are used to overcome the
perceived weakness of the brand
13. EXAMPLE 2
APPLE SONY
POINTS of
DIFFERENCE
Powerful in
terms of online
distribution
Powerful in
retail stores
Design oriented Quality oriented
Powerful in
terms of
communication
Sony is a
reader than a
media device
POINTS of
PARITY
1. Communication tools
2. E-book content
3. Online & retail distribution
14. SUMMARY
• Developing a positioning requires identification
of optimal points of Parity and Points of
Difference
• Points of Parity – Unique
Types : 1. Category & 2. Competitive
• Points of Difference – Need not be Unique
Three criteria to determine :
1. Deliverability
2. Desirability
3. Differentiability