![Aperçu ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Page Mesurer le rendement en matière d’activités scientifiques connexes ( 2009 ) ( 2011 )]()
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Destaque
Destaque (20)
Semelhante a Mesure du rendement des S et T à Environnement Canada
Semelhante a Mesure du rendement des S et T à Environnement Canada (20)
Mesure du rendement des S et T à Environnement Canada
- 1. Mesure du rendement des S et T à Environnement Canada Eric Gagné Directeur par interim, Division de la politique scientifique Environnement Canada Symposium sur la science publique de l’IPFPC le 13 mai, 2010
- 5. Quelques faits à propos de la R et D et des ASC à Environnement Canada Page R et D ASC R et D offre les connaissances de base, la crédibilité afin d’appuyer les réglementations, politiques, programmes, etc. d’EC. Les Activités scientifiques connexes (ASC) permettent à EC de respecter son mandat par des activités de surveillance, de mise à l’essai et de prédictions, etc. EC est l’un des dix plus importants établissements de R et D à l’échelle mondiale, et la principale source de recherche environnementale au Canada (2006). EC est le plus grand producteur de sciences naturelles des ASC parmi les ministères fédéraux. Environ 25 % du budget d’EC (250 M$) est consacré aux activités de R et D, et environ 15 % de ses employés (1000 équivalents à temps plein) travaillent en R et D. Environ 45 % du budget (450 M$) est consacré aux ASC, et environ 40 % des employés (2500 équivalents à temps plein) y travaillent.
- 9. Page Une mesure du rendement de la R et D sous forme de « tableau de bord » http://www.ec.gc.ca/scitech : “Gestion des S&T”
- 12. Liens : Réseaux de collaboration nationale Page Almost 90% of EC’s peer-reviewed scientific publications are co-authored with at least one external partner Collaborations entre les directions et directions générales d’EC avec ses partenaires (Figure produite par Science-Metrix , 2009 ) Remarque : L’épaisseur des lignes et la taille des cercles (directions, directions générales d’EC) indiquent le nombre de collaborations http://www.ec.gc.ca/scitech : “Gestion des S&T”
Notas do Editor
- Work done by S&T Strategies…
- In the first part of this presentation: I will be talking about why we’re measuring R&D performance I will also describe our approach to measuring R&D In the second part of this presentation: I will provide an overview of results and discuss how we got them I’ll go over only a few results and quickly, so for more details: A copy of the Report is available for consultation – soon to be released on the web Finally I’ll talk about where we’re headed in terms of measuring our science
- R&D performance measurement is important: positioning our scientific work and getting the word out. Also: the EC Science Plan and Federal S&T Strategy (guiding document for federal science) commit to measuring S&T: For better management of scientific activities To enhance the accountability to Canadians Lack of R&D, RSA under the PAA
- List the four principles Alignment is about relevance to departmental, government priorities, addressing the needs of Canadians Linkages is about drawing together internal and external capacity, the Department’s standing within the scientific community Excellence is about high-quality and leading-edge and relevant R&D Environment is about creating the conditions necessary, through financial and human resources, world-class infrastructure Staged approach: we’ve completed stage 1, I’ll talk about current stages later on… ACKNOWLEDGE THE IMPORTANCE OF RSA, BUT WE DO R&D FIRST BECAUSE… I’ll now present the findings from this first stage, based on each of these principles
- To assess alignment, we surveyed R&D performers, users and funders across the Department to examine the timeliness and responsiveness of EC’s R&D This slide represents the links between performers and users. The arrows point from R&D producers to users and the thickness of lines represents the intensity of links (i.e. the number of times links between OPs were reported). The “ hubs” or circles happen to be priority areas for EC and the federal government: 3A2 (Risk Assessment – Chemicals Management Plan) 1B1 (Aquatic ecosystems are preserved and protected – National Water Strategy) 1C1 (EC’s governance of ecosystem approach
- 40% increase
- Specialization in climate meteorology and the atmospheric science, pollution, environmetnal toxicology and health and general environmental sciences
- Methods: StatsCan data on personnel and expenditures, lab accreditation Was rated as “fair” Federal and EC intramural (i.e. in-house) R&D funding has remained constant since 2004 Overall expenditures include salary, O&M Funding for R&D infrastructure appears to be on the rise, following a decline. Some new investments include: $14 million under Budget 2009 for modernizing EC laboratories $770K (through INAC) for upgrading Arctic research facilities
- We also plan to develop measures for our RSA, which encompasses many of the Department’s S&T activities We will only focus on a few categories for RSA measures that are of central importance to EC RSA for the public good Despite it being a major part of federal science, it is often neglected in favour of R&D