2. Introduce you to Edward Gibbon, a foundational
thinker on the end of the Roman Empire
Think about the impact of Gibbon’s work
Start to prepare for the revision session in two
weeks
Consider how later historians modified,
developed and rejected Gibbon’s ideas about
the end of the Roman Empire
Provide an overview of modern scholarship on
the end of the Roman Empire
3. Political
Empire
Absolutism vs. democracy
and reform
Revolution
Formation of nations
Intellectual
Enlightenment
▪ Rationalism over religion
▪ Science
▪ History as science – historicism
in 19th C
4. Wealthy family
Educated in London and Oxford
Passion for theological controversy
Conversion to Catholicism and back to
Protestantism
5 years studying in Lausanne
Essai sur l'Étude de la Littérature (1761):
literary celebrity
Service in the South Hampshire militia
1762: commences Grand Tour, including
travel to Rome, where he says idea for the
Decline and Fall took root
1773: appointed honorary 'professor in
ancient history' at the Royal Academy
1774: MP for Liskeard, Cornwall
1776-1788: publication of the Decline and Fall
in 6 volumes
5. “...at the distance of twenty-five years I can
neither forget nor express the strong emotions
which agitated my mind as I first approached
and entered the eternal City. After a sleepless
night, I trod, with a lofty step the ruins of the
Forum; each memorable spot where Romulus
stood, or Tully spoke, or Caesar fell, was at once
present to my eye; and several days of
intoxication were lost or enjoyed before I could
descend to a cool and minute investigation.”
6. The volumes were a commercial and literary
success
Negative appraisals:
Strongly criticised for its view of Christianity
(chapters 15-16 banned in several countries)
Accused on anti-Semitism
Negative view of middle ages: “I have described
the triumph of barbarism and religion.” (3.71)
Rejection of contemporary democratic
movements
Positive appraisals:
Praised for its style (e.g. by Winston Churchill)
and ideas (Isaac Asimov)
Emphasised importance of primary sources
rather than secondary accounts (first modern
historian?)
7. Read the extracts from Gibbon’s Decline and
Fall that I have provided
In pairs discuss the following questions:
What does Gibbon say were the key factors in the
success of early Christianity?
What reasons does he give for the failure of
paganism/ polytheism to resist Christianity?
Why were people attracted to Christianity,
according to Gibbon?
8. Internal factors are pre-
eminent
Factors built in to the
imperial system
the role of the army
the role of the emperor
Christianity weakens the
Roman spirit
monks rather than
legionaries
The barbarians defeat an
already-decrepit system
9. In pairs, spend a bit of time discussing
the homework reading by Bowersock
Between you, decide on 3 key points that
you think Bowersock is trying to make
Get ready to present them back to the
rest of the class
You have 8 minutes
10. Spend a couple of minutes thinking about what
you’d like to do in the revision class in two weeks.
Think about both content you’d like to cover and
how you’d like to cover it (= process)
Are there any gaps that you’d like to see filled?
Do you have any concerns about the format of the
exam?
Which topics have you particularly enjoyed and would
like to focus on?
Is there anything we can learn from other revision
classes that you’ve had in the past?
11. Over the next few slides we’ll be working through the
historians that I asked you to look at for homework
▪ J.B. Bury
▪ Henri Pirenne
▪ Arnaldo Momigliano
▪ G.E.M. de Ste. Croix
▪ Peter Brown
Spend 5 minutes (either on your own or with someone
who researched the same historian)
Think of about 5 key points relating to your historian’s
views on the end of the Roman Empire
Get ready to feed them back to the rest of the class
I will summarise your points on the PowerPoint
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17. Toronto and Vienna Schools (Goffart and Pohl)
Degree of continuity in personnel
Was there a migration?
Is there more continuity with the Roman period than allowed?
Who writes the histories and what can they tell us?
Archaeological perspectives (e.g. Ward-Perkins)
Decline in material conditions is discernable and measurable;
But: Is this the right question to ask? What about the Islamic-
Byzantine worlds?
Migration is important (e.g. Heather; response by Halsall)
Transformations of the Roman World
EU-funded project; the origins of Europe and European nations…
What about the medieval world? Should we be viewing it
from the perspective of what was lost with fall of Rome?
18. Is Gibbon’s model still useful for thinking about the
end of the Roman Empire?
Why? What might it help us to do?
Can we identify common themes in these analyses
of the end of the Roman Empire?
19. Context of interpretation is extremely important
Modern concern for multiculturalism/ migration
Cf. Gibbon’s Enlightenment concerns (e.g. anti-religion)
Nationalism was important in 19th/early 20th Cs
Europeanism in the late 20th C
Sources/methodologies/ theories that are privileged are also vital
Interest in certain kinds of evidence allows certain kinds of
interpretations
Methodologies (i.e. ways that you engage with your sources; e.g.
textual analysis; social history; political history)
Theories that underpin interpretations (e.g. Marxism)
Direction of viewpoint will alter perspective and therefore
interpretation:
From perspective of the high empire or from the medieval kingdoms?
Or from Byzantium/ Islamic world or W. Europe?
20. Read the following article, which summarises
some (relatively) recent work on the fall of Rome
and the barbarian invasions:
Guy Halsall (1999), ‘Review article: Movers and
Shakers: the Barbarians and the Fall of Rome’, Early
Medieval Europe 8.1, pp. 131-145
Email me (jamie.wood@manchester.ac.uk) if
you have any concerns or ideas for the revision
session
Optional: watch Visiting Scholar Michael
McCormick on "Climate Change and the Fall of the
Roman Empire” (YouTube, 2011)