Noida Sector 135 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few C...
Facial pain non odontogenic causes-part1
1. FACIAL PAIN-NON ODONTOGENIC
CAUSES
Prof. A.V. SRINIVASAN,
MD, DM, Ph.D, D.Sc(hon)F.A.A.N, F.I.A.N.
Emeritus Professor
The Tamilnadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University
Former Head
Institute of Neurology, Madras Medical College
Ragas dental college-7-09-11
2. Facial Pain
Understanding, Impact and
Awareness
We learn by thinking and the quality of the learning outcome
is determined by the quality of our thoughts
R.B. Schmeck
3. “Pain May be Inevitable, but Misery is Optional”
Dee Malchow
Pain constitutes nearly 40% of the total of patient visits to doctors. 1
“ByNature All Men/W en are alike but
om
byEducation widelydifferent”
1 Mäntyselkä et al. Pain as a reason to visit the doctor: a study in Finnish primary health care. Pain. 2001 Jan;89(2-3):175-80.
- Chinese
4. Pain is undertreated
In 2001, Barry Furrow wrote “Pain is undertreated” in the American health-care
system at all levels.2
The term "opiophobia" has been coined to describe this remarkable clinical
aversion to the proper use of opioids to control pain.
The possible reasons for health-care providers' failures to properly manage pain are
many;
– Occasional lack of knowledge about appropriate treatment choices for pain
management
– A reflection of a Culture hostile to drug use
– Threats of legal action.
– Worry about tolerance and addiction and other adverse drug effects
– Something as trivial as the lack of insurance cover, can lead to patients
suffering unnecessary pain as a result.
2. R.M. Marks and E.J. Sachar, "Undertreatment of Medical Inpatients with Narcotic Analgesics,"Annals of Internal Medicine, 78 (1973): 173.
5. Indian Scenario
Despite an essentially stoic and less demanding Indian patient; the
obligation to manage pain comes to the fore not only to complete the
perfection of a clinicians management.
But also, it is an independent entity with physical and psychological
components that in adherence to best practices can neither be ignored nor
treated such that adverse effects eclipse the malady.
This importance of pain management is further increased when benefits for
the patient are realized,
– Early mobilization which tends to prevent the more dangerous
complication of a deep vein thrombosis;
– Shortening hospital stay
– Reducing costs
6. Decade of Pain Control and Research
In late 2000, US Congress passed into law a provision,
which the president signed , that declared the 10 year
period beginning Jan 1st 2001, as the Decade of Pain
Control and Research.
The American Pain Society has actively supported the
Decade of Pain Control Research, and it has been a focal
point for the development of numerous programs to
advance awareness and treatment of pain and funding for
research.
7. What is Pain?
• Pain is always a subjective experience
• Everyone learns the meaning of “pain” through
experiences usually related to injuries in early life
• As an unpleasant sensation it becomes an emotional
experience
The International Association for the
• Pain is a significant stress physically, emotionally pain an
Safety of Pain (IASP) defines
unpleasant sensory and emotional
experience associated with actual or
potential tissue damage, or described in
terms of such damage, or both.
(American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2002; Loeser et al, 2001; Merskey H et al, 1994; Portenoy et al, 1996)
8. Qualities of Pain
Organic vs. psychogenic
Acute vs. chronic
Malignant or benign
Continuous or episodic
Perceiving Pain
• Algogenic substances – chemicals released at the site of the injury
• Nociceptors – afferent neurons that carry pain messages
• Referred pain – pain that is perceived as if it were coming from
somewhere else in the body
9. Acute vs. Chronic Pain
ACUTE CHRONIC
Function To warn None (destructive)
Etiology Usually Clear Complex/obscure
Pt. Mood Anxiety/fear Depression/anger
MD impact Comforting Frustrating/draining
Role of Rx Control/cure Improve function/QOL
10. Categorization of Chronic pain
Types of Pain
Types of Pain
(Psychogenic)
(Psychogenic)
Pain arising from
Pain arising from Pain arising from
Pain arising from
pain receptors
pain receptors Pain with NO apparent cause
Pain with NO apparent cause
Nervous system
Nervous system
[Nociceptive Pain]
[Nociceptive Pain] (e.g. Low back pain or some
(e.g. Low back pain or some [Neuropathic Pain]
[Neuropathic Pain]
pelvic pain in women)
pelvic pain in women)
Peripheral
Peripheral
Central
Central
Superficical / /Somatic
Superficical Somatic Deep / /Visceral
Deep Visceral
(Brain and Spinal cord)
(Peripheral nervous
(Peripheral nervous
(Brain and Spinal cord) system)
system)
Keay, KA; Clement, CI; Bandler, R (2000). "The neuroanatomy of cardiac nociceptive pathways". in Horst, GJT. The nervous system and the heart. Totowa, New
Jersey: Humana Press. p. 304
11. Different types of pain
Nociceptive descriptors Neuropathic descriptors
Cramping, tender Shooting
Gnawing, heavy Hot-burning
Aching Sharp
Splitting Stabbing
12. Multidimensional Classification of Pain
IASP (International Association for the Study of Pain) expert multi-axial classification of chronic pain
Axis I: Anatomical location
Axis II: Systems
Axis III: Temporal Characteristics (intermittent, constant, etc.)
Axis IV: Patient’s Statement of Duration/ Intensity / severity
Axis V: Etiology
Example:
Mild post-herpetic neuralgia of T5 or T 6; 6 months’ duration = 303.22e
Axis I: Thoracic region
Axis II: Nervous system (central, peripheral, or autonomic); physical
disturbance/dysfunction
Axis III: Continuous or nearly continuous, fluctuating severity
Axis IV: Mild severity of 1 to 6 months
Axis V: Trauma, operation, burns, infective, parasitic (one of these)
(Loeser et al, 2001; Merskey et al, 1994)
13. Dimensions of Chronic Pain
Chronic pain has a psycho-
Depressio
Hostil
social component that must
ity
be dealt with before
n depression becomes a part of
Psychological
Loneline
the clinical picture. Chronic
Pathological
Anxie
pain should be recognized as
Factors
Physical
Process
Social
Factors
Factors
a multi-factorial disease state
ss
ty
requiring intervention at
many levels.
A.G. Lipman, Cancer Nursing, 2:39, 1980
TIME
14. Pain: Social and Psychological Factors
Chronic pain has high co-morbidity
– Depression
– Anxiety disorders
– Sleep disorders
All diminish function and quality of life
Addressing these issues is essential to optimal pain
management
Give us the GR ACE to acce pt with se re nity the thing s that canno t be
chang e d the COURAGE to chang e the thing s that sho uld be chang e d
and the WISDOM to kno w the diffe re nce
15. Current Understanding of Pain
Chronic pain is NOT a normal part of aging.
Emotions play a key role in painful experience
Pain sounds a warning, signaling damage to tissues, and has survival value so pain receptors do not adapt
to prolonged stimulation and pain sensation may intensify as pain thresholds are lowered by continued
stimulation.
The 19th Century viewed pain as a solely physiological entity with two theories dominating – the
“specificity” & the “summation” theories. 8
Paradigm Shift:
– Pain perception impulses are modified by ascending and by descending pain-suppressing systems
activated by various environmental and psychological factors.
– 1965 Melzack & Wall: Gate Theory of Pain marked a turning point in understanding transmission
and modulation of nociceptive signals, and recognition of pain as a psychophysiological
phenomenon.
The concept of Neuroplasticity was recognized and accepted adding dynamism to neuronal & brain
structure with neuroimaging of the central nervous system in three domains; anatomical, functional, and
chemical imaging helping measure changes in chronic pain.
Taken together these three domains have changed our thinking on pain; now considered an altered brain
state in which there may be altered functional connections or systems and components of degenerative
aspects of the CNS. 9
8) 11. J.A. Paice, C. Toy, and S. Short, "Barriers to Cancer Pain Relief: Fear of Tolerance and Addiction," Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 16 July 1998): 1-9.
9) Quick Reference Guide for Clinicians No. 1a. AHCPR Publication No. 92-0019: February 1993
20. Nerve Fibres
Αδ ( A delta)
Myelinated
Fast conductors
Gentle pressure and pain
Αβ (A beta)
Thinner – but still
myelinated
Fast conductors
Heavy pressure &temp
C - very thin
Slow conductors
PAIN, Pressure, temp &
chemicals
21. Pathophysiology of Chronic Pain
In chronic pain, the nervous system remodels
continuously in response to repeated pain signals
– nerves become hypersensitive to pain
– nerves become resistant to anti-nociceptive system
If untreated, pain signals will continue even after
injury resolves
Chronic pain signals become embedded in the central
nervous system
(Marcus, 2000)
22. Pain-Sensing System in the
Malfunction in Chronic Pain
Acute pain:
Pain Pain-sensing signals
Sensing are initiated in
response to a stimulus
In chronic • They elicit a pain-
pain, pain relieving response
signals are
generated
Chronic pain:
without
physiologic Pain signals are
significance generated for no
reason and may be
intensified
• Pain-relieving
(Illustration: Seward Hung, 2000) mechanisms may be
defective or
deactivated
23. Role of Serotonin and Norepinephrine
Reticulospinal fibers from raphe nuclei project to dorsal horn of spinal cord and
release serotonin which stimulates interneurons to release enkephalin
Enkephalin inhibits transmission of pain and temperature signals in second order
neurons
Reticulospinal fibers from locus coruleus also project to dorsal horn of spinal cord
and release norepinephrine which inhibits pain and temperature signals by an
unknown mechanism
Mental illnesses such as depression decrease serotonin and norepinephrine and
lower pain thresholds while antidepressant drugs and therapies (e.g., exercise)
which increase serotonin and norepinephrine levels raise pain thresholds
24. Pathophysiology of Pain
Inferred from characteristics, etiology or pathophysiology
Types
– Nociceptive
– Neuropathic
– Idiopathic
Therapeutic implications
(Portenoy et al, 1996)
25. Nociceptive Pain
Presumably results from ongoing activation of primary
afferent neurons responding to noxious stimuli
Pain consistent with degree of tissue injury
Described as aching, squeezing, stabbing, throbbing
Subtypes:
– Somatic: related to activation of somatic afferent neurons
– Visceral: related to activation of visceral afferent neurons
(Loeser et al, 2001; Portenoy et al, 1996)
26. Neuropathic Pain
Initiated by a primary lesion in the nervous system; believed to be sustained
by aberrant somatosensory processing in the peripheral or central nervous
system
Independent of obvious ongoing nociceptive activation
Burning, shooting, electrical quality; may be aching, throbbing, sharp
Subtypes:
– Presumed “central generator”
deafferentation pain (central pain, phantom pain)
Sympathetically-maintained pain
– Presumed “peripheral generator”
Polyneuropathies and mononeuropathies
(Portenoy et al, 1996)
27. Idiopathic and Psychogenic Pain
Idiopathic Pain
Usually exists in the absence of an identifiable physical or
psychologic pathology that could account for pain
Uncommon in patients with progressive illness
Psychogenic Pain
Presents positive evidence of a predominant psychologic
contribution and may be labeled with a specific psychiatric
diagnosis
(Loeser et al, 2001; Merskey et al, 1994; Portenoy et al, 1996)
28. Recent Developments In Pain Management
Greater understanding of the pathophysiology underlying chronic
pain syndromes
Scientific breakthroughs in molecular biology; insight into pain at
the molecular level
Advances in drug therapy (drug delivery technologies)
Multimodal therapy
Multidisciplinary teams, shared decision-making that includes
patients
Patients’ rights movement
(JCAHO, 1999; Loeser et al, 2001)
29. Progress in Chronic Pain Management:
Therapeutic Modalities for
Chronic Pain Management
Assessment
30. “Describing pain only in terms of its
intensity is like describing music only in
terms of its loudness”
von Baeyer CL; Pain Research and Management 11(3) 2006; p.157-162
31. Pain Assessment
Characterize the pain
Characterize the disease, relationship between pain
and disease and potentially treatable etiologies
Clarify syndromes and infer pathophysiology
Determine need for urgent therapy
Identify other needs
Develop a therapeutic strategy
(Portenoy et al, 1997)
32. Pain Assessment
Components
History: temporal features, intensity, topography, quality,
exacerbating/alleviating factors
Physical Exam: determine existence of underlying pathology
Lab and Radiographic Tests: appropriate to pain syndrome
Assessment Tools
Pain Intensity Scales: VAS, NAS, “faces” scale
Multidimensional Pain Measures: Brief Pain Inventory, McGill
Pain Questionnaire
(Portenoy et al, 1997)
33. Pain Intensity Rating Scales
• Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
No pain ----------------------------------- Worst pain
• Numerical Rating Scale
0 ------------------------------------- 10
Worst pain
No pain
imaginable
•Categorical Scale
None (0) Mild (1 – 4) Moderate (5 – 6) Severe (7 – 10)
• Pain Faces Scale
0 2 4 6 8 10
No Hurts just a Hurts a little Hurts even Hurts a whole Hurts as much
hurt little bit bit more more lot as you can
imagine
• Brief Pain Inventory Shade areas of worst pain. Put an X on area that hurts most
(Cleeland, 1991; Jacox et al, 1994)
34. Progress in Chronic Pain Management
Therapeutic Modalities for Chronic
Pain Management
Treatment
36. Status of antidepressants in chronic pain management
Best evidence: TCAs
– Inhibit both NA and 5-HT reuptake
TCAs are superior to SSRIs in pain management
TCAs are superior to the anticonvulsant
There is no consensus regarding which of the many TCA
derivatives is most effective.
The choice of TCA is therefore dictated largely by adverse
effects
Neurologic Complications of Cancer Therapy Current Treatment Options in Neurology 1999, 1.428-437
Litsedge, A Double-Blind Comparison of Dothiepin and Amitriptyline for the Treatment of Depression with Anxiety, Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 19, 153--162 (1971)
37.
38. INTRODUCTION
Major reason for seeking medical care.
90% is vasculr headache.
10% is mixture of inflammation,traction or
dilatation of pain sensitive structure.
A true commitment is a heart felt promise to yourself from which you will not
back down
- D. Mcnally
39. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Pain
Referred pain
– Pattern of referred pain
Success in life is a matter not so much of talent and opportunity
as of concentration and perseverance
- C.W. Wendte
40. CLINICAL ASSESSMENT
History
– Hx of present illness
– Past medical hx
– Family hx
– Social hx
Physical examination
We possess by nature the factors out of which personality can be made, and to organize them into
effective personal life is every man’s primary responsibility
- Harry Emerson Fosdick
41. CLINICAL ASSESSMENT
Clinical features suggesting serious cause
– Crescendo
– Early morning
– Vomiting
– Fever
– Seizures & other neurological symptomes
– Worst headache in my life
– Known malignancy
– Tenderness
42. Facial pain
Typical Neuralgias
1) Trigeminal neuralgia
• Characterized by recurring paroxysmal severe pain,
brief duration (seconds) in the territory of the
trigeminal nerve, spontaneously or initiated by
chewing, talking, touching the affected side of the
face.
• Unknown aetiology, an arterial loop pushing on the
sensory root in the posterior fossa.
• Females affected more than males
• Analgesics, surgery, destruction of the sensory
neuron, division of nerve root.
43. Facial pain
Typical Neuralgias
2) Glossopharyngeal neuralgia
• Unknown cause
• Equal both sexes
• Severe, sudden episodes of pain in the
tonsil region one side only, ipsilateral ear.
• Pain - severe for 1-2 hours, recur daily
• Treated like trigeminal
44. Facial pain
Typical Neuralgias
3) Sluder’s neuralgia and Vidian neuralgia
• Intractable pain in the nose, eye, cheek
and lower jaw.
• Could be due to lesion of the
sphenopalatine ganglion, or vidian nerve.
• Analgesics, vidian neurectomy
45. Facial pain
Posttraumatic neuralgia
– Neuroma
– Parietal & occipital
– 90% recovery
Experience can be defined as
yesterday’s answer to today’s problems
46. Facial Pain
Atypical facial pain
Pain felt over the cheek, nose, upper lip or
lower jaw
Usually bilaterally symmetrical
Aching, shooting, burning, accompanied by
reddening of the skin and lacrimation or
watering of the nose
Lasts for hours, days or weeks
Psychological consultation, analgesics
47. Symptomatic Neuralgias
Intracranial lesions
1) Central lesions
• Tumours of the brain stem, M.S., thrombotic
lesions, metastasis, occult naso-pharyngeal ca.
• No precipitant, sensory loss.
2) Post herpetic neuralgia
• Herpes zoster may affect trigeminal nerve
ganglion
• Vesicular rash covers one division commonly
the 1st with severe pain.
49. Headache
Headache is one of the commonest symptoms in
medical practice.
Aetiology:
1) Raised intracranial pressure
50. Headache
3) Migraine
Congenital predisposition
Triggered by hunger, certain foods, sleep - too
much or too little, hormonal variations, stress.
Pathology-vascular dilatation
Females affected more than males
? Proceeded by aura usually visual, paraesthesiae
of hands, weakness
Headache is unilateral or bilateral, affects any
area of the head, aching or throbbing often
accompanied by nausea and vomiting
Diagnosis - by history alone
Treatment - prevention by avoiding precipitating
factors, appropriate medication.
51. Headache
4) Tension headache
More common in adult females
Positive family history (40%)
Maybe associated with migraine
Produced by persistent contraction of the
muscles of the neck, head and face
Caused by emotional tension, secondary to
other headaches, posture habit
Treated by analgesics, muscle relaxants,
physiotherapy
52. Headache
5) Cluster headache
90% are men
Age 20 - 30
Attacks occur in groups, no aura
Caused by vascular dilatation of branches of
external carotid
Triggered by histamines, alcohol
Treated by analgesics, anti-histamine, steroids
53. Pains from head and neck
muscles
Pain from temporalis muscles
Can arise from grinding teeth at night
(bruxism), impacted wisdom teeth,
temporomandibular joint dysfunction,
anxiety when the patient clenches the jaws
too tightly
Treatment: Refer to interested dental
surgeon.
54. Pains from head and neck
muscles
Pain from upper neck muscles
Can radiate over the head
Treatment by physio-therapist or
rheumatologist
Pain from frontalis muscles
Usually due to bad posture at work or
while driving
Treatment: physio-therapy
55. Pains from head and neck
muscles
Cervical spondylosis
Pain mediates upwards from the neck to the
occiput or vertex to the front of the head, down to
the shoulders
Due to cervical discs prolapse
Diagnosis - x-ray
Treatment: Physio-therapy, referral to
rheumatologist
56. Pains from head and neck
muscles
Temporal arteritis
Due to acute inflammation of the artery, the cause
unknown, affects men and women over the age of
60
Pain over the temples and frontal region, intense,
throbbing, tenderness over the scalp, swelling and
redness of the overlying skin with general malaise,
partial or complete loss of vision.
ESR Elevated
Treatment: Cortisone, analgesics
57. Pains from head and neck
muscles
Psychologic headache
Usually accompanied by depression,
anxiety
No organic lesion
It is a great misfortune not to possess sufficient wit to speak well
nor sufficient judgment to keep silent
La Broyers character
60. READ not to contradict or confute
Nor to Believe and Take for Granted
but TO WEIGH AND CONSIDER
THANKYOU
My sincere thanks to
P.Sampath
61.
62. Cerebrovascular
Emergencies
Is survival a mere stroke of Luck?
“My Opinions are founded on knowledge but modified by experience”
63. Every minute matters: ‘time is brain’
Expert is one who think to his
chosen mode of ignorance
64. INTRODUCTION
Perceptual
Sense (Observation)
Word Sense (Recording)
Common Sense (Thinking)
– Will lead you to get - Clinical Sense
“ He who cannot forgive others destroys the bridge over
which he himself must pass” - Annoy
65. Cerebrovascular disease –
Mind boggling facts
World wide incidence: 2/1000 population/annum 1
Incidence in people aged 45 – 84 years: about 4/1000 1
Incidence in India: was 36/100,000 for the year 1998-1999 3 in a
study in Calcutta
Incidence of mortality due to stroke (India: WHO study):
73/100,000 per year2
CVD is the most disabling of all neurologic diseases.
50% of survivors have a residual neurologic deficit.
Greater than 25% require chronic care.
1.A practical approach to management of stroke patients; 1996; 360-384
2. Epidemology of cerebrovascular disorders in India; 1999; 4-19
3. Neuroepidemiology 2001;20:201-207
If you think you can or you can’t You are always right
66. Annual risk CVD, MI, vascular
death following TIA, minor CVD
• CVD 6.7 %
• MI 2.5 %
• Death 7.2 %
• CVD, MI, Vascular death 8.6 %
• CVD, MI, Death 10.3 %
Experience can be defined as yesterday’s answer to
today’s problems
67. Indian scenario
1880 death / day
due to stroke in India
Equal to 6 Boeings 737 crashes every day
68. Indian scenario
Number of deaths due to stroke
22 times that due to malaria
4 times that due to RHD
1.4 times that due to TB
Almost equal to deaths due to IHD
69. Comparison
India vs. established market economies
(Age adjusted stroke mortality)
2 to 3 times stroke
mortality higher in India
Indian immigrants to England have higher
risk or dying due to stroke than local
population
70. Comparison
USA – stroke mortality decline since 1940’s
India likely to increase
– Increase life expectancy (aging population)
– Urbanization
74. Acute stroke interventions –
evidence based medicine
Stroke care units vs general wards
– 9% relative risk reduction
– 56 deaths or dependency avoided / 1000 acute
strokes treated / year
Aspirin
– 3% relative risk reduction
– 12 deaths or dependency avoided / 1000 active
strokes treated / year
75. Acute stroke interventions –
evidence based medicine
Thrombolysis – (even in USA only 1% of
strokes are thrombolysed)
– 10% relative risk reduction
– 63 deaths or dependency avoided
(91 early deaths due to haemorrhage)
Heparin
– No benefit
76. Conclusion
People who survive stroke – 90% are left
with deficit – minimal / mild / moderate /
severe
None of the presently available therapy has
any major impact hence prevention is
critical
77. New role of doctors
“Managers of Change”
“Preventors of Change”
(Health ill health)
78. Global
15 million deaths globally
every year due to vascular disease
(30% of all deaths)
79. Global
By 2020 – stroke and myocardial
infarction will constitute leading cause
of death / disability
80. Lowering blood pressure
Primary prevention – 17 randomised trials –
reduction of 5 to 6 mmHg diastolic and
10.12 mmHg systolic BP – 38% reduction
of stroke
Secondary prevention – have we made
PROGRESS
81. Common Stroke Mimics
Hypoglycemia
Post ictal state
Drug overdose
Concussion with neck injury
Migrainous accompaniment
Encephalopathies with focal signs
Hyponatremia
Subdural hematoma, Empyema
Focal Encephalitis: Herpes
Being ignorant is not so much a shame as being unwilling to learn
82. Guidelines for 24 hrs – Mandatory
Level of Evidence
Level A: Based on RCT or Meta analysis of
RCT
Level B: Based on Robust Experiment or
Observation Studies
Level C: Based on Expert opinion.
“The True Art of Memory is The Art of Attention” - S.Johnson
83. 1. History And Examination
a. Stroke clerking Performa (1994) R.C.P.
1. Improved patient Assessment
2. Improved Management - not clear
3. Improved outcome - not clear
b. Examination
1. Secure Diag of Stroke
2. Specify Impairment
3. Identify sub type of Ischemic stroke
4. Rule out stroke mimics
“ We Sometimes think we have forgotten something when
in fact we never really learned it in the first place”
Imp.Your Memory Skills
84. Guideline: 3 (B) - CPR
– CPR is rarely successful in the setting of stroke – Sneeder
1993.
Guideline: 4(B) Investigations:(Sagar 1995)-
435 PTS)
– Chest x-ray 16% ABN
– Only 4% change clinical management
– Order x-ray chest if weight loss or chest symptoms
present
Through Action You Create your Own Education - D.B. ELLIS
85. Guideline 5: (B) ECG:
– Cardiac cause of Death (30 days) Ebrahim 1990.
– All conscious patients to have ECG
Guideline 6: (C) CT:
– Routine CT Head is a must
– King’s fund forum(1988) gives useful framework
– Weir 1994 Clinical scoring cannot distinguish
– CT done if: a) Uncertainty of Stroke
b) If Anticoagulation or Anti Platelet
treatment contemplated
c) IV rtPA
Thought is the labour of the intellect
Reverie is its pleasure
86. Guideline 7:(B) M.R.I.
– Mohr 1995, - Unclear for Implications for
clinical practice
– 2004 – PWI > DWI – IV rtPA very useful
Whatever the Mind can conceive and Believe,
the mind can Achieve -Napoleon Hill
87. Guideline 8: (B) ECHO no Routine
– Echo in Acute Stroke – Cardiac cause/Thrombus LV
– TEE is superior to TTE
– Amer Heart Asson (1997) - same conclusion
– Yield is very low. (Leung 1993; Chambors 1997)
– Only when abnormal ECGS - change clinical
management
Imagination is more Important than Knowledge
88. Guideline 9: (A) – Doppler scan for selected
patients
– > 80% stenosis benefits from Endarterectomy
– Subst Storke -Good recovery - do doppler
– Useful in posterior circulation
A open foe may prove a curse ; but a pretended friend is worse
89. Guideline 10: (B) Management:
– Fever (Worst Prog.) Reith 1996
– Hypoxia (Moroney 1996) - Exac. by seizures
Pneumonia and Arrythmias - Worst outcome
– Hyperbaric O2 ineffective (Nighoghossaln 1995)
– Haemodilut. Plasm Expanders; venesection
– No evidence for efficacy (As plund - 1997)
Check ABG only if Hypoxia suspected.
It is a great misfortune not to possess sufficient wit to speak well
nor sufficient judgment to keep silent - La Broyers character
90. Guideline
11: (A) Steroids and Hyperosmolar
agents Unproven treatment –
– Tumor oedma responds but not cytotoxic stroke
oedma qialbash 1997 - No effect on survival or
improv. In funct. Outcome
– Mannitol - (Boysen 1997) - short term effective
statistically in conclusive
You are what you think and not what you think you are
91. Guideline 12: (B) - Blood Pressure
– Defer - acute reduction of BP - 10 days unless HT
Encephalopathy or aortic dissection present
– Moris 1997 - Increase BP - falls in 10 days
– UK - 5mm in D.B.P. 1/3 storke - Low BP prompt correct of
hypovoll. and withdrawal of hypotonic drugs
– Collins 1994 - HT - Prim. stroke prevent
– Neal 1996 (Current RCT) - HTs in stroke survivors -study
needed
– Acute reduction of BP only if thrombolysis considered
We learn by thinking and the quality of the learning outcome is
determined by the quality of our thoughts
R.B. Schmeck
92. Guideline 13: (A/B) – AF
– AF / ISCH Stroke/ Mild disability - Warfarin after
48 Hrs (Longer for larger)
– Aspirin for others
EAFT 1995 Less than 2 PT - No effect
SPAF 1996 > 5 - Bleeding
Discipline Weighs ounces; Regret weighs Tons
93. Guideline 14:(B/C) - Blood sugar
– Weir (1997) > 8 mm d/Lit - Poor outcome
– Acute MI + 11 mm d/Lit - Intensive Insulin - improved
(Malmberg 1997)
A great many people think they are thinking when they are
merely re arranging their prejudices
W. James
94. Guideline 15: (A) Cholesterol
– Prosp. Study collob.: 1993 - Epidem study do
not support
– Blaun 1997: Metranauetic - Chollest & statin
30% decrease - stroke in CAHD patients.
– Sacks 1996 - Tot chol: decrease to 4.8
mmol/Lit benefits
Many Ideas grow better when transplanted into another mind than
in the one where they sprang UP
O.W. Holmos
95. Guideline 16: (A/C) Deep vein thrombosis
– Kalra 1995 - 10 days - stroke Pts - 50%
– Sandercock 1993 - Pul embol 6-16% only
– Ist 1997 - 5000 IV or 12500 twice daily - Hemorrage greater
– Gradual stocking value - useful in Surg - pts but its value not
evaluated - (Wells 1994)
– Use with caution - if periph artery insuf. is present hence do
not use heparin on stockings.
A woman’s desire for revenge outlasts all her other emotions
96. Guideline 17: (A/B) Pressure sure
– Event health care (1995) specialised low
pressure mattress systems to be used than stand
Hospital - mattress
Every discovery contains an irrational element or
4 creative intuition
97. Management of infarction
– Guideline 18: (A)
Aspirin 75 - 150 /Day
3 yrs 40% reduces of vascular events in 1000 pts (APTC -
1994)
Stroke sub type value ? (TACI, PACI, LACI, POCI)
Dienners - 1996, synergy possible with Clopidogrel
Ticlopidine etc.
I have never let my Medical schooling interfere with my education
Mark Twain
98. Anti Coagulation
Warfarin - AF
– In sinus rhythm - uncertain
– Spirit 1997 low dose ABP + Warfarin in TIA &
Minor stroke - Stopped of HE
– Heparin (IST 1997) – Significant reduction in
early death (12 fewer in 1000) not better than
aspirin
– So avoid Heparin (A)
“ H who cannot forgive others destroys the
e
bridge over which he himself must pass” -
99. Thrombolysis (A)
Warlow 1997 - Uncertain clinical benefit
2004 – NINDS – Thrombolysis
conclusively proved its efficacy – first 3 hrs
When they tell you to grow up, they mean stop growing
Piccaso
100. Guideline 20: (I) Hemorrhage
– Hankey and hon 1997: Supra tentorial
evacuation for ICH is controversial - Avoid
– Infra tentorial - Yes
– Main Indication - Deteriorating or depressed
consciousness
A (Neurologist’s) life is like a piece of paper on which everyone who
passes by leaves an impression
- Chines proverb
101. 2 2 4 P ts
Guideline 21 : Ventilation
131
I n t u b a tio n
93
N o t In tu b -Decreased level of
consciousness - increased
6 4 D is c h a r 6 7 D ie d
mortality and poor final
3 4 R e d ta g 2 1 d is c h t o
n ver h om e
8 D is c fo r
p a llim a
1 D is c
H om e outcome
- Absent pupillary light
3 D ie d 7 D ie d 3 D ie d
responses - poor prognosis
A medical school should not be a preparation for life.
A school should be life
102. PITFALLS
Basing treatment of stoke on brain imaging
along without a vascular work-up
Missing early infarct signs on CT
Underestimating the time of symptom onset
for patients who wake up with a stoke
Overtreatment of hypertension in acute
stoke
Three can be seen in the divisions of a human in mind, body and spirit
103. PITFALLS
Overuse of carotid endarterectomy in
asymptomatic patients
Not investigating both extracranial and
intracranial circulations
Failure to distinguish severe cartid stenosis
from total occlusion
Not obtaining spinal fluid for patients with
suspected subarachnoid hemorrhage
“Social Isolation is in itself a pathogenic
Factor for disease production”
104. PITFALLS
Not treating patients with large artery
ischmic stroke indefinitely with antiplatelet
terapy
Failure to recognize lacunar stoke
Inadequate use and dosing ofHMG Co-A
reductase inhibitors (statins) inpatients with
cerebrovascular disease
Through Action You Create your Own Education - D.B. ELLIS
105. PROGNOSTIC PEARLS
Flaccid Paralysis for more than 96 hrs
When tendon reflexes recover without return of voluntary
movement – prognosis poor
Recovery of sensory less in usual to a degree. Postion sense
recovers but not pain and temperature
Recovery from Dysphasia is never complete
Dysarthria usual improves and Dysphagia never improves
Diplopia due to brain stem is usually permanent
Conjugate gaze – recovers
Vertigo improves but hearing loss is permanent
Pseudobulbar palsy permanent
“ByNature All Men/W en are alike but
om
byEducation widelydifferent”
106. STOKE MYTHOLOGY
GENERAL MYTHS
DIAGNOSTIC MYTHS
THERAPEUTIC MYTHS
Serious, sincere, systematic study surely secures supreme success
107. GENERAL MYTHS
PHYSICIAN+ MRI = NEUROLOGIST
MINISTROKE
CHAOTIC
CVA
COMMUNICATION
Discipline Weighs ounces Regret weighs Tons
108. DIAGNOSTIC MYTHS
Self evident cause
Ischaemic stroke + AF
Lacunes, Lacunar infarcts and small vessel
disease
Cryptogenic stroke
PFO and Cardiogenic stroke
Experience can be defined as
yesterday’s answer to today’s problems
109. Ultrasound Diagnosis
In skilled hands, ultrasound may show:
• Carotid occlusion or stenosis
• MCA occlusion or stenosis
• Vertebrobasilar occlusion
• Extracranial dissection
The secret of walking on water is
Knowing where the stones are
111. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)1
High level of anatomic detail for precisely locating the
stroke and determining the extent of damage.
Especially useful for small blood vessels due to high
sensitivity
Advances in the early detection of stroke involve
using diffusion and perfusion weighted imaging.
1. Curr Opin Neurol. 2004 Aug;17(4):447-51
Memory, the daughter of attention, is the teeming
mother of knowledge - Martin Tupper
113. Other Diagnostic Tools-1
Magnetic Resonance Angiography1 (MRA)
Carotid Duplex Scanning2:
Transcranial Doppler (TCD)3
Xenon CT Scanning4
Science is below the mind; Spirituality is beyond the mind
114. Other Diagnostic Tools -2
Radionuclide SPECT Scanning1
PET Scanning2
Transesophageal Echocardiography3
1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 May;22(5):928-36
2.Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2003 Nov;13(4):741-58
3. Heart Dis. 2003 Sep-Oct;5(5):320-2
Success is a prize to be won. Action is the road to it.
Chance is what may lurk in the shadows at the road side.
115. THERAPEUTIC MYTHS
Evidence based medicine = Randomized Clinical
Trials
– Best Research Evidence
– Clinical Expertise
– Patient Values
Systematic Escalation of anti thrombotic therapy
Brain Hemorrhage Demands Neuro surgical
Consultation
116. Thrombolysis in acute stroke
Dead/dependent follow-up 62% vs 69% s.
Deaths by day 14 22% vs 12% s.
Deaths during follow-up 22% vs 19% s.
Deaths ordered by antithrombotic 40% 30% 17% 10%
Deaths ordered by thrombolytic 3% 20% ns.
Deaths ordered by stroke severity 11% 29% ns.
Symptomatic ICH by 14 dys 9.3% vs 2.5% s.
Fatal ICH by 14 dys 6% vs 1% s.
Dead/dependent follow-up < 3 hr. 55% vs 71% s.!
Dead follow-up < 3 hr. 20% vs 25% ns.
NATURE, TIME AND PATIENCE
are the 3 great physicians
117. NINDS Consensus
Door to MD evaluation 10 min
Door to CT completion 25 min
Door to CT read 45 min
Door to treatment 60 min
Access to neurological expertise 15 min
Access to neurosurgical expertise 2 hrs
Admit to monitored bed 3 hrs
Memory, Pity and Beauty are short lived in life;
But tinged with emotion persist in life
118. CONCLUSION
• MYTHS
• PITFALLS
• PROGNOSTIC PEARLS
It is the disease of not listening, the malady of not marking,
that I am troubled withal - Shakespeare
119. CVD – Prevention or Cure?
While number of curative methods are
available, preventive therapy is
undoubtedly the main strategy in the
management of CVD
Lijec Vjesn. 2003 Nov-Dec;125(11-12):322-8
The sign wasn’t placed there
By the Big Printer in the sky
120. Where are we ……?
Call
Stroke onset emergency
Secondary
prevention services
Full recovery
U RS
Activated
(15 minutes)
Neuroprotective
drug infused
Drugs administered
‘stroke-treatment’ 6-8 O during transport
cocktail H ER stroke team
Brain scan
The art of medicine is caring for the heart of the patient
124. READ not to contradict or confute
Nor to Believe and Take for Granted
but TO WEIGH AND CONSIDER
THANK YOU
My sincere thanks to Thudhimugan .K for
his meticulous computer work
Editor's Notes
08/13/12 12:55 PM Numerous surveys from the United States and Europe during the last decade have shown that 30% to 50% of adult patients in active therapy for a solid tumor experienced chronic pain. With advanced disease, the prevalence of pain increased to 90%. A recent survey by the IASP concluded that the inferred mechanism of pain is neuropathic in 40% of cases. In a very large survey of institutionalized elderly patients with cancer, the prevalence of pain was 27.4%, and pain was associated independently with age, gender, race, marital status, functionality, and cognitive status. Cancer pain is often associated with psychological distress and functional impairment. Unrelieved pain may significantly impaired quality of life . In the AIDS population, the prevalence rates range from 25% to 80%. This broad range reflects differences in populations studied and pain assessment methodologies. Bernabei R, Gambassi G, Lapane K, et al: Management of pain in elderly patients with cancer. JAMA. 1998;279:1877-1882. Caraceni A, Portenoy RK, a working group of the IASP Task Force on Cancer Pain. An international survey of cancer pain characteristics and syndromes. Pain . 1999;82:263-274. Cleeland CS, Gonin R, Harfield AK, et al: Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:592-596. Heim HM, Oei TP: Comparison of prostate cancer patients with and without pain. Pain. 1993; 53:159-162. Portenoy, RK: Cancer pain. Pathophysiology and syndromes. Lancet. 1992; 339:1026-1031. Portenoy RK, Kornblith AB, Wong G, et al: Pain in ovarian cancer. Prevalence, characteristics, and associated symptoms. Cancer . 1994;74:907-915. Serlin RC, Mendoza TR, Nakamura Y, et al: When is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function. Pain. 1995;61L277-284.
08/13/12 12:55 PM Chronic pain may be seen as presenting a fundamental challenge to medicine. The experience of chronic pain is very common and chronic pain is part of the experience of many illnesses. However, the links between the experience of chronic pain and visible or detectable pathology or diagnosable illness are often non-existent or unclear. In philosophical terms, chronic pain challenges the distinction between mind and body which much medical knowledge assumes. It also challenges the notion of cure as a goal of medical practice. And we face such patients routinely in our practice. Infact 40% of our total patients constitute pain sufferers. And there is always an urge when talking of pain, to magnify its image, using eye-catching overstatements and graphology and create a larger than life impression. Health care professionals face pain so often; they develop some form of defense mechanism to deal with it. Some learn to ignore it, some play it down and some others dismiss it with a wry smile. But the age old adage remains and shall remain true till science evolves several steps and generations in progress; diagnose as many, treat some, cure a few, but empathize with all.
08/13/12 12:55 PM Pain being such an important presenting complaint in practice, the US government declared the last decade as Decade of Pain Control and Research. This also helped in development of numerous programs to advance awareness and treatment of pain and funding for research.
08/13/12 12:55 PM
08/13/12 12:55 PM Neuropathic pain caused by damage to or a dysfunction of the nervous system e.g. post herpetic neuralgia, diabetic neuropathy, pain following trauma or compression is generally un-diagnosed and poorly managed Nociceptive pain is caused by noxious stimuli of pain receptors with info transferred centrally e.g inflammation or headache, it is managed by analgesics, NSAIDs or opioids
08/13/12 12:55 PM This system is the most comprehensive approach to classification of chronic pain syndromes; it is intended to standardize descriptions of pain syndromes and provide a point of reference. The system establishes a 5-digit code that assigns a unique number to each chronic pain diagnosis. The digital code (1 through 9 within each “axis”) is first, followed by letters used as suffixes, if necessary. Axis I: concerned with regions; if patient has pain in more than one region, use two codes Axis II: concerned with systems, such as nervous system, respiratory, musculoskeletal, etc.; some details open to debate, but practicality should prevail Axis III: deals with characteristics of pain Axis IV : filled in according to the patient’s report of severity or chronicity of the illness Axis V: concerns mechanisms involved in pain production and is most open to debate. Letters (a, b, c, d, etc.): Since some syndromes have same final five-digit code, a letter may be added to the sixth place to distinguish them. It could indicate acute vs chronic conditions, but usually merely indicates the first of several conditions to be described with the same five digits. An example: Mild postherpetic neuralgia of T5 or T 6, 6 months’ duration = 303.22e Axis I: Thoracic region Axis II: Nervous system (central, peripheral, or autonomic); physical disturbance/dysfunction Axis III: Continuous or nearly continuous, fluctuating severity Axis IV: Mild severity of 1 to 6 months Axis V: Trauma, operation, burns, infective, parasitic (one of these) Loeser JDF, Butler, SH, Chapman CR et al. Bonica’s Management of Pain. 3 rd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2001:19-21. Merskey H, Bogduk N, eds. Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms. 2nd ed. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 1994: 3-4.
08/13/12 12:55 PM Complicated by central processing that allows pain to be experienced as a cognitive function.. How we interpret pain is important and can affect patients life- as shown in next slide where the interplay of afferent and efferent fibres is demonstrated.
08/13/12 12:55 PM The physiology of normal pain transmission involves some basic concepts that are necessary in order to understand the pathophysiology of abnormal or nonphysiologic pain. These include the concept of transduction of the first-order afferent neuron nociceptors. The nociceptor neurons have specific receptors that respond to specific stimuli if a specific degree of amplitude of the stimulus is applied to the receptor in the periphery. If sufficient stimulation of the receptor occurs, then there is a depolarization of the nociceptor neuron. The nociceptive axon carries this impulse from the periphery into the dorsal horn of the spinal cord to make connections directly, and indirectly, through spinal interneurons, with second-order afferent neurons in the spinal cord. The second-order neurons can transmit these impulses from the spinal cord to the brain. Second-order neurons ascend mostly via the spinothalamic tract up the spinal cord and terminate in higher neural structures, including the thalamus of the brain. Third-order neurons originate from the thalamus and transmit their signals to the cerebral cortex. Evidence exists that numerous supraspinal control areas—including the reticular formation, midbrain, thalamus, hypothalamus, the limbic system of the amygdala and the cingulate cortex, basal ganglia, and cerebral cortex—modulate pain. Neurons originating from these cerebral areas synapse with the neuronal cells of the descending spinal pathways, which terminate in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Brookoff D. Chronic Pain: A New Disease? Hosp Pract (Off Ed) 2000;35:45-52, 59.
08/13/12 12:55 PM Expand on neural plasticity here – changes in chronic pain vs acute pain is important
08/13/12 12:55 PM Medication acts on different areas of this pathway Ask the audience what medication is effective at each Here we can add in the five points to pain NSAIDs at periphery mostly Paracetamol – or acetaminophen centrally Opioids on ascending pathways interfere with sP A beta fibres affecting gating of pain in S G – T cells Descending pathways also affect T cells in SG
08/13/12 12:55 PM Chronic pain is not just a prolonged version of acute pain. It often occurs in the absence of ongoing illness or after healing is completed, and often begins with an injury that causes inflammation and CNS changes. The injured area heals, scar tissue is formed, and the inflammation recedes. But for an unknown reason, the nervous system undergoes multiple changes that perpetuate the pain experience, continuing to send pain signals to somatic muscles. The nervous system reacts to the memory of the original injury and sends signals like those sent in response to that original injury. These signals become a recurring and disabling message that remind the patient of the original injury. As pain signals are repeatedly generated, neural pathways undergo physiochemical changes that make them hypersensitive to the pain signals and resistant to antinociceptive input. The pain signals can become embedded in the spinal cord, like a painful memory. This is why the c urrent perception of pain can be influenced by prior experience of chronic pain. Marcus D. Treatment of nonmalignant chronic pain. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61:1331-1338; 1345-1346.
08/13/12 12:55 PM Effective management of pain relies on a comprehensive assessment that defines the characteristics, etiology, and the underlying pathophysiology of the pain. Etiology. Defining the underlying organic activity that may be contributing to the pain may clarify the nature of the disease, indicate a prognosis, or suggest the use of specific therapies. Pathophysiology. Animal and clinical research suggest that the clinical presentation and the response to therapy of a particular pain syndrome may be determined by factors linked to the underlying mechanism of the pain. Although the classification that can be derived from such observations may be oversimplistic, it has clinical utility and so has become widely accepted. Using this scheme, the predominating pathophysiology of pain can be broadly defined as nociceptive, neuropathic, and idiopathic. Characteristics. The patient should be asked to describe the characteristics of the pain in terms of temporal aspects, intensity, topography, and exacerbating/relieving factors. Portenoy RK, Kanner RM, eds. Pain Management: Theory and Practice. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Company; 1996:11.
08/13/12 12:55 PM Nociceptive pain is presumably related to ongoing activation of primary afferent neurons responsive to noxious stimuli. The activation of the nociceptors is related to tissue damage, although the relationship between pain and tissue damage is neither uniform nor constant. Nociceptive pain includes somatic pain and visceral pain. Somatic pain refers to ongoing activation of somatic afferent neurons. Bone pain is a typical example of this type of pain. Visceral pain is related to the activation of the primary afferent neurons that innervate viscera. Liver capsular pain is an example of visceral pain. Loeser JDF, Butler SH, Chapman CR et al. Bonica’s Management of Pain. 3 rd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2001:581. Portenoy RK, Kanner RM, eds. Pain Management: Theory and Practice. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Company; 1996:11. Loeser JDF, Butler, SH, Chapman CR et al. Bonica’s Management of Pain, 3 rd Ed., Baltimore, Lippincott Williams Wilkins , 2001. Portenoy RK, Kanner RM, eds. Pain Management: Theory and Practice. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Company; 1996:219-247.
08/13/12 12:55 PM Neuropathic pain is believed to be sustained by aberrant somatosensory processing in the peripheral or central nervous system. It includes numerous clinical entities, which vary in their presentation pathophysiology and treatment. The classification is based on inferred location of the pain “generator” (peripheral or central) and types of mechanisms involved. Three major categories have been recognized: deafferentation pain, sympathetically-maintained pain and peripheral neuropathic pain. Deafferentation pains are presumably related to pathophysiologic processes in the CNS. Subtypes include pain caused by injury to the brain or spinal cord, phantom pain, postherpetic neuralgia and pain caused by root avulsion. Sympathetically-maintained pain is defined as a pain presumed to be sustained by efferent activity in the sympathetic nervous system. A sympathetic nerve block is needed to establish the diagnosis of sympathetically-maintained pain. This type of pain appears to occur most frequently in the setting of a complex regional pain syndrome. The term complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), also known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy or causalgia , refers to a regional pain syndrome in which pain is associated with focal autonomic dysfunction (vasomotor instability, swelling, sweating) and/or trophic changes (thinning of the skin, changes in hair growth, bone and subcutaneous tissue losses). Peripheral neuropathic pain is usually caused by a focal peripheral nerve injury or by a diffuse injury (polyneuropathy). Portenoy RK, Kanner RM, eds. Pain Management: Theory and Practice. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Company; 1996:83, 87, 93.
08/13/12 12:55 PM Idiopathic pain persists in the absence of an identifiable organic substrate and is believed to be excessive for the organic processes that exist. This type of pain is uncommon in mentally ill patients. A subgroup of patients with idiopathic pain presents positive evidence of a predominant psychologic contribution to the pain. These pains are described as psychogenic or are labeled with a specific psychiatric diagnosis. Loeser JDF, Butler SH, Chapman CR et al. Bonica’s Management of Pain. 3 rd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2001:19-21. Merskey H, Bogduk N, eds. Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms . 2nd ed. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 1994. Portenoy RK, Kanner RM, eds. Pain Management: Theory and Practice. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Company; 1996:11.
08/13/12 12:55 PM Since the early 1960’s, developments have taken place that can rectify some of the deficiencies in the understanding and treatment of pain that existed even in the early 20 th century. Research has given us a greater understanding of the pathophysiology underlying many chronic pain syndromes. This understanding has led to advances in drug therapies, the use of multimodal therapies, and the belief that in some cases the optimal treatment of chronic pain is best managed by a multidisciplinary team. A pioneer and giant in the field of pain therapy, John Bonica, established the first multidisciplinary pain clinic, the Multidisciplinary Pain Center, at the University of Washington in 1960. Patient’s rights movements have been supported by documents such as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Association’s (JCAHO) Pain Standards for 2001 , which states that all patients have the right to the appropriate assessment and management of pain. Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Patient Rights and Organization Ethics. Referenced from the Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals, Update 3, 1999. http://www.jcaho.org/standards_frm.html Loeser JDF, Butler SH, Chapman CR et al. Bonica’s Management of Pain. 3 rd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2001:3-15.
08/13/12 12:55 PM Numerous surveys from the United States and Europe during the last decade have shown that 30% to 50% of adult patients in active therapy for a solid tumor experienced chronic pain. With advanced disease, the prevalence of pain increased to 90%. A recent survey by the IASP concluded that the inferred mechanism of pain is neuropathic in 40% of cases. In a very large survey of institutionalized elderly patients with cancer, the prevalence of pain was 27.4%, and pain was associated independently with age, gender, race, marital status, functionality, and cognitive status. Cancer pain is often associated with psychological distress and functional impairment. Unrelieved pain may significantly impaired quality of life . In the AIDS population, the prevalence rates range from 25% to 80%. This broad range reflects differences in populations studied and pain assessment methodologies. Bernabei R, Gambassi G, Lapane K, et al: Management of pain in elderly patients with cancer. JAMA. 1998;279:1877-1882. Caraceni A, Portenoy RK, a working group of the IASP Task Force on Cancer Pain. An international survey of cancer pain characteristics and syndromes. Pain . 1999;82:263-274. Cleeland CS, Gonin R, Harfield AK, et al: Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:592-596. Heim HM, Oei TP: Comparison of prostate cancer patients with and without pain. Pain. 1993; 53:159-162. Portenoy, RK: Cancer pain. Pathophysiology and syndromes. Lancet. 1992; 339:1026-1031. Portenoy RK, Kornblith AB, Wong G, et al: Pain in ovarian cancer. Prevalence, characteristics, and associated symptoms. Cancer . 1994;74:907-915. Serlin RC, Mendoza TR, Nakamura Y, et al: When is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function. Pain. 1995;61L277-284.
08/13/12 12:55 PM The goal of pain assessment is the development of a pain-oriented problem list, which, in addition to characterizing pain, prioritizes other physical and psychosocial problems that may influence therapy or be amenable to primary treatment. Portenoy RK, Payne R: Acute and chronic pain. In: Lowinson JH, Ruiz P, Millman RB, eds. Comprehensive Textbook of Substance Abuse. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1997:563-589.
08/13/12 12:55 PM In order to make a comprehensive evaluation, the physician must take a detailed history from the patient. Temporal Features. Temporal features include onset, duration, frequency and constancy of the pain. Pain can be acute or chronic. Chronic pain may be punctuated by breakthrough pains (transitory acute pain). Intensity. Pain intensity should be measured validly and repeatedly using a simple scale. (See next slide) Topography. Pain can be described as focal, multifocal, generalized, referred. Focal pain s are usually well circumscribed, at the site of the lesion. Referred pains are experienced at a site remote from the presumed lesion. Pains can be referred from an injury in any deep tissues, including viscera, muscle, bone and peripheral or central nervous system. Quality. Descriptors of pain quality can be clues to underlying mechanisms. Somatic pains are often described as aching, throbbing or sometimes stabbing. The quality of visceral pains will vary according to the organ. In injury to hollow viscus, the pain is often described as cramping or gnawing. Neuropathic pains are usually described as dysesthesic (lancinating, burning, electric-shock-like, tingling). Exacerbating/Relieving Factors. Factors that aggravate or relieve pain may be useful for diagnostic purposes and treatment: they can be categorized as volitional or spontaneous. Pain induced by light touch on normal skin (allodynia) suggests a neuropathic component. Portenoy RK, Payne R: Acute and chronic pain. In: Lowinson JH, Ruiz P, Millman RB, eds. Comprehensive Textbook of Substance Abuse, 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1997:566-567.
08/13/12 12:55 PM A “faces” scale may be useful for patients who are unable to use NRS or VAS scales, such as children, the elderly, or patients with dementia. The Brief Pain Inventory is a straightforward and easily administered tool that provides the practitioner with information about pain history, intensity, location, quality, and interference. It includes a number of questions, each of which is answered by the patient on a scale of 1 to 10. Included are questions about pain characteristics as well as functionality. It also includes the simple body outlines above, on which the patient is asked to mark the areas of greatest pain. Cleeland, CS. Pain Research Group University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center. BPI Copyright 1991. Wong DL, Hockenberry-Eaton M, Wilson D, Winkelstein ML, Schwartz P. Wong’s Essentials of Pediatric Nursing. 6 th ed. St Louis, Missouri: Mosby, Inc.; 2001:1301. Reprinted by permission .
08/13/12 12:55 PM
08/13/12 12:55 PM Opioid Analgesics . Opioids are the mainstay drugs for moderate-to-severe pain associated with medical illness. Opioid analgesics can be classified as pure mu-agonists or agonist-antagonists based on their receptor interactions. The agonist-antagonist class can be subdivided into a mixed agonist-antagonist subclass and a partial agonist subclass. Because of their ceiling effect for analgesia and potential for reversing analgesia from pure agonists in physically-dependent patients, the agonist-antagonist drugs are not preferred for treating chronic pain. Nonopioid Analgesics. N onopioid analgesics include acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS). They are usually used for mild-to-moderate pain. They have an additive effect when combined with opioids. There is substantial variability in the response of individual patients to different drugs. The selective COX-2 inhibitors (celecoxib, rofecoxib, valdecoxib, oncloxicam) have a more favorable GI safety profile than the nonselective COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors. The nonselective drugs vary in toxicity. Drug selection should be influenced by drug-selective toxicities, prior experience, cost, and convenience. Adjuvant Analgesics. Adjuvant analgesics are drugs that have other primary indications but may be analgesic in specific circumstances. In the medically ill, adjuvant analgesics are more commonly used in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Drug selection should be guided by the risks associated with the therapy and the possibility of secondary benefits for symptoms other than pain. Sequential trials and dose titration are usually necessary. The appropriate use of adjuvant analgesics requires the clinician to know the approved indications, side effects, time-action relationship, pharmacokinetics, and specific guidelines for use in pain treatment. Cashman JN. The mechanisms of action of NSAIDS in analgesia. Drugs. 1996;52(suppl 5):S13-S23 . Galer BS. Painful poplyneuropathy. Neurologic Clinics. 1998;16(4):791-811. Hanks GW, Portenoy RK, MacDonald N, et al. Difficult pain problems. In: Doyle D, Hanks GW, MacDonald N, eds. Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine . Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998:454. Langman MJ, Jensen DM, Watson DJ, et al. Adverse upper gastrointestinal effects of rofecoxib compared with NSAIDs. JAMA. 1999;282:1929-1933. Simon LS, Weaver AL, Graham DY, et al. Anti-inflammatory and upper gastrointestinal effects of celocoxib in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999;282:1921-1928. Stein C. The control of pain in peripheral tissues by opioids. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1685-1690.