This document discusses health economics and reimbursement implications for emerging pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. It outlines the roles of the federal and provincial governments in regulating drug prices and approving drug coverage in Canada. It emphasizes the importance of demonstrating a drug's value and return on investment to payers through strong clinical evidence, health economic analyses, and addressing payer priorities. Adopting early life-cycle strategies in these areas can help companies achieve faster market access and maximize a product's potential.
Marel Q1 2024 Investor Presentation from May 8, 2024
Health Economic and Reimbursement Implications for Emerging Pharmaceutical/ Biotechnology Companies: Strategies and perspectives
1. Health Economics and
Reimbursement Implications for
Emerging Pharmaceutical/
Biotechnology Companies
Quality Work • Valuable
Strategies and Perspectives
Results
MaRS • Future of Medicine Series 1
2. Agenda
Quick Intro
Pharmaceutical/biopharma policy in
Canada
Health Economics and Reimbursement
Delivering ROI
2
3. Introduction
Focus on Health Economics,
Reimbursement and Pricing
Which innovations deliver ROI and how?
Past decade working with or for industry
Evolution of Patented Medicine Prices Review
Board (PMPRB)
Creation of Common Drug Review (CDR)
Bill 102+, payer negotiations
3
4. 1984 - Canada Health Act
Federal legislation
Physician services
Hospital care
Universality, accessibility, comprehensiveness,
portability, public administration
Not pharmaceuticals / Biotech / medical
devices
4
5. Federal Government
Federal Focus – Regulatory
Safety & efficacy
Line of questioning = “can the drug be used”
compared to (usually) placebo
Product assessment (NOC) / Post-marketing
Ensure Patented Medicine Prices are not
excessive (PMPRB)
Drug coverage for
Military, Prisoners, First Nations & Inuit Canadians
5
6. Provincial Government
Provincial Focus – Providing Coverage
Will we pay for this drug?
Line of questioning = “Is it worthwhile
compared to what’s available”
Formulary Assessment
Drug Coverage Programs
Hospital-Based Care
6
7. Total Drug/Biopharma Expenditures, Canada
1985 to 2005
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information. Available at http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/products/
7
drug_expenditure_1985_2008_e.pdf
8. Factors Driving Pharmaceutical
Expenditure
Increased drug consumption
More patients are taking medications
Patients are taking more medications
More expensive new drugs
New drugs have higher acquisition costs
Increased price of existing drugs
Prices increase just as they do with other
products
8
9. Product Assessment
Until early – mid 20th century – None
1950s-1960s – Safety
1970s-1990s – Efficacy
1997- Access (i.e., reimbursement)
9
10. Product Assessment
2009 and beyond
Remember this –
And don’t forget this…..
10
11. Product Assessment
2009 and beyond
US Health Care Reform
John Andrews, President and Head of R&D for NeurAxon,
“Currently the US offers the quickest access to market for companies like
mine, and if there is going to be a change to reimbursement rates,
and if there is going to be reimbursement at different rates, then it is
certain to extend timelines for getting to the market and increase
costs.”
Further Globalization
Comparative Effectiveness
11
12. Making Sense Of It
Pricing Reimbursement
Health Canada
PMPRB - Federal
Product Assessment
Price Ceiling
CDR - National
More Product Assessment
Provinces
Negotiate Prices/Rebates Provinces
Further Product Assessment
13. ROI for Payers
The 3 Pillars Leading to Reimbursement
Health
Clinical Payer
Economic
Evidence Priorities
Evidence
13
14. Importance to Pharma/Biotech?
Successfully Demonstrating Product Value:
– Faster Time to Market
– Quicker Uptake
– Maximizing Product Potential
$
Doing
it right
Time
Development Launch Post-Launch
Doing
it wrong
14
15. Clinical Pillar
Clinical Trial Design
1. RCT Evidence
2. Active Comparator
3. Appropriate duration
4. Meaningful endpoints
5. Representative patient population (??)
Remember the payer’s line of questioning…..
15
17. Industry – R&D Phase I
Phase I – Clinical trials
- Safety data, no efficacy data
Role of Health Economics
Modeling target product profile (TPP)
Understanding disease burden
Price justification
Is a drug worth developing?
18. Industry – R&D, Phase II
Phase II Randomized Controlled Trials
(RCTs)
Applications of studies planned from
pharmacoeconomic perspective
Role of Health Economics
Answers questions posed in Phase I
Is the TPP being met?
To what extent?
Proceed to Phase III?
19. Industry – R&D, Phase III
Phase III RCT - Efficacy & Safety
Comparative Evidence
Role of Health Economics
‘Piggy-back’ pharmacoeconomic analysis
Best evidence for
Federal approval
Payer Reimbursement
Quality of Life/resource utilization
20. Industry – R&D, Phase IV
Phase IV - Post-marketing
Role of Health Economics
Assessment of actual use
Effectiveness rather than efficacy
Comparison to other drugs and services
Modelling
21. Importance to Pharma/Biotech?
Successfully Demonstrating Product Value:
– Faster Time to Market
– Quicker Uptake
– Maximizing Product Potential
$
Doing
it right
Time
Development Launch Post-Launch
Doing
it wrong
21
22. Health Economic Pillar
Demonstrating “Value for Money”
Early development and validation of cost
-effectiveness models
Incorporating appropriate outcomes in your
clinical trials
22
23. Other Factors to Consider
Affordability
Budget Impact
Public Outcry
High profile or underserved diseases
Many provinces have defined priorities
Physician/patient advocacy
23
24. Some Examples
1. Stelara - Psoriasis
2. Herceptin – Breast Cancer
3. Xarelto – THR/TKR
Future Examples…..
24
25. In Summary
Health care expenditures will continue to rise
putting greater pressure on all stakeholders
Successful companies will be those that see
a need to deliver ROI to payers and adopt
early life-cycle strategies
Clinical
Economic
Payer Priorities
25
26. THANK YOU!
Colin Vicente
(T) 647-669-1483
cvicente@pivina.com
www.pivina.com Its all about ROI
26