3. Technology changes at very fast speed
Learning takes time
Language
Technology ….
learning
acquisition of language at a faster rate?
enhanced learning?
better language and communication skills?
4. Technology changes at very fast speed
Learning takes time
Language
Technology ….
learning
interference?
acquisition of unhealthy communication
habits/practices?
c u @ *$ - See you at Starbucks
F u cn rd ths thn wats th prblm (Crystal, 2008:6) –
If you can understand this then what’s the problem
5. Part One – Theoretical
1. Evolution of technology in language education
2. Key assumptions, issues and challenges
3. Sustainability of using technologies and media
Part Two - Practical
1. Implications
2. Incorporating technology into language courses
3. An organic approach
6. Internet Wifi, 3G, 4G, Web
Software (CDs)
(early) 2.0
little or no high interactivity,
high interactivity,
interactivity, low medium
high accessibility
accessibility accessibility
chat, skype, blog,
drills, structured practices email, discussion
wiki, twitter, second
(asynchonous) forum (asynchonous)
life (synchronous)
7. Is technology shaping how language is taught or
learned?
Are language acquisition theories guiding use of
technology in the language classroom?
Can both inform each other for an optimum
learning experience?
8. Internet
Software (CDs) Web 2.0
(early)
Patterndrills and Variety of tasks In addition to
structured practices and activities that linking information
behaviorist help lower anxiety, and learners,
increase motivation provides
(through opportunities for
interaction) engagement and
Combination of participation
cognitive and (Warshauer &
affective learning Grimes, 2007)
humanistic social
constructivist
(Bruffee, 1993;
Vygotsky, 1978)
9. learners interact to create and negotiate meaning
in a meaningful, effective way
◦ quality of written output – maturity of thoughts,
organization and fluency (Beauvois, 1998; Blackstone,
2007; Lee, 2009; Leppanen & Kalaja, 1995; Pellettieri,
2000; Sengupta, 2001)
◦ group dynamics (Warschauer, Turbee & Roberts,1996)
◦ participation rate (Chun, 1994; Kern, 1995; Sengupta,
2001; Sullivan & Pratt, 1996; Warschauer, 1996)
10. learners interact to create and negotiate meaning
in a meaningful, effective way
◦ reducing stress (Beauvois, 1998)
◦ building of confidence (Skinner and Austin, 1999)
◦ collaborative learning (Bump, 1990; Pychyl, Clarke &
Abarbanel, 1999; Shive, 1999; Soh & Soon, 1991)
11. learners interact to create and negotiate meaning
in a meaningful, effective way
◦ “more time to process and monitor the interlanguage,
synchronous network-based communication fosters the
negotiation of meaning and form-focused interaction”
(Pellettieri, 2000:83)
◦ “electronic discussion can be a good environment for
fostering use of more formal and complex language, both
lexically and syntactically” (Warschauer, 1996:22).
12. scaffolded learning
zone of proximal development (Vygotsky, 1978)
learners develop their cognition (and linguistic competence)
by interacting and communicating with people within their
knowledge community
17. Theories and
Quality of new
assumptions
technology
are priority
Sound and Tension –
solid empirical social tool for
research academic
(insufficient ) purpose
Pedagogy
18. “technology is NOT a guarantee for the better … it
may actually hinder [L2] development if, as
teachers, we are only guided by mindless
innovation” (Negueruela-Azarola, 2009: 245)
19. framework grounded in theories and assumptions
◦ how individuals engage with their surroundings
and community in creating meaning and in
enhancing learning
◦ an interactive interface which provides a
participatory and interaction platform that
allows and encourages learners to build upon
what they already know through working within
similar learner and learning communities
◦ accessibility of platform
20. Commercially available comprehensive
programmes
Free tools on the internet for specific purpose
Social networking tools for interaction
21. Rosetta Stone (http://www.rosettastone.com/)
34. Personal Learning Environment (PLE)
Mobile learning (m-learning)
Corpus-driven and collocation-driven tools
35. individualized learning environment
empowerment of choices in learning
Virtual Learning
Environment (VLE) Personal Learning
Environment (PLE)
Language Management
System (LMS)
38. Organic approach
“The organic metaphor sees second language
acquisition more like growing a garden than
building a wall. From such a perspective, learners
do not learn one thing perfectly, one item at a time,
but numerous things simultaneously (and
imperfectly).” (Nunan, 1995:102)
39. Organic approach to integration of
technology into language learning
environment, community – meaningful communication and
effective learning
ecosystem
eclectic and dynamic
40. KC Lee
Centre for English Language Communication
National University of Singapore
Email: elcleekc@nus.edu.sg