SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
Download to read offline
HIGHLIGHTS FROM

The 2013 Global
Innovation 1000 Study
NAVIGATING THE DIGITAL FUTURE

Download the full strategy+business article and view infographics,
our past studies, and more at www.booz.com/innovation1000.
THE 2013 GLOBAL INNOVATION 1000 STUDY SNAPSHOT

Booz & Company’s ninth annual study of innovation trends and spending shows
that R&D investment at the public companies that were the 1,000 biggest spenders
globally reached the highest level ever this year, US$638 billion. However, after two
years of more than 9 percent growth post-recession, this year’s spending growth of
5.8 percent is a return to the long-term trend.
Apple, Google, and 3M have been at the top of the global “Most Innovative
Companies” ranking for the last three years, but this year Samsung has overtaken 3M
to claim the third spot. Amazon has also made a significant move, leaping six spots
into fourth place this year. Tesla joins the list for the first time, and Facebook makes a
return after a year’s hiatus, while Toyota and P&G have fallen farther down the list.
This year, we also surveyed the use of digital tools at 350 companies around the
world. On average, we found that 8.1 percent of R&D spending is being allocated
to digital enablers, from familiar project management software to the newest
crowdsourcing and collaborative design tools. The tried-and-true productivity
enablers are must-haves in the innovator’s digital tool kit. But many companies have
started to also use digital enablers to develop market and customer insights. The
benefits are measurable: The heaviest users of digital tools are 77 percent more likely
to report that their companies financially outperform the competition.

CHANGES IN THE 10 MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANIES

2010

2011

2012

2013

1st

Apple

Apple

Apple

Apple

2nd

Google

Google

Google

Google

3rd

3M

3M

3M

Samsung

4th

GE

GE

Samsung

Amazon

5th

Toyota

Microsoft

GE

3M

6th

Microsoft

IBM

Microsoft

GE

7th

P&G

Samsung

Toyota

Microsoft

8th

IBM

P&G

P&G

9th

Samsung

Toyota

IBM

10th

Intel

Facebook

Amazon

Tie

IBM
Tesla
Facebook

2

Booz & Company
KEY FINDINGS OF THE 2013 GLOBAL INNOVATION
1000 STUDY
R&D Spending [read more]
•	R&D spending among the top 1,000 spenders globally reached an all-time
high of $638 billion in 2013, an increase of 5.8 percent from 2012, compared to 9 percent-plus growth in the two previous years.
•	China’s R&D spending increase of 35.8 percent this year was the highest
of any region, but it is the second lowest increase for China over the past
five years, likely a reflection of the country’s slowing economic expansion.
•	R&D spending was once again highest in dollar terms at North American
companies ($248 billion, an 8.6 percent increase over last year). And
Europe’s R&D spending ($189 billion, a 4.5 percent increase from 2012)
continues to be the second-highest.
•	The computing and electronics industry spent the most on R&D in dollar
terms ($170 billion); the software and Internet sector saw the highest percentage increase in spending (22.1 percent, or $9.3 billion).
Performance Drivers [read more]
•	For the ninth year in a row, we have found no correlation between how
much companies spend on R&D and their financial performance.
•	How companies spend their innovation dollars is much more important.
Our studies have consistently shown that innovation investments in select
capabilities, tools, talent, and culture which are tightly aligned with a
business’s strategy are what drive sustained success.
Navigating the Digital Future [read more]
•	Respondents to our survey say their companies are using a mix of digital
tools: tried-and-true productivity enablers and newer market and customer
insight enablers. The right mix, which many are still struggling to find,
depends on a company’s industry, capabilities, and innovation model.
•	On average, our survey respondents say their companies spend 8.1 percent of their R&D budgets on digital enablers.
•	Less than half of respondents say they use digital enablers to a significant
extent, but those that do are 77 percent more likely to report that they
financially outperform competitors than are those who use them to a low
or moderate extent.
Digital enabler: electronic tool, or process supported by an electronic tool,
that improves speed, cost, quality and/or complexity. Examples relating to
innovation: visual simulation, rapid prototyping/3D printing, computer-aided
design, customer relationship management system.

3

Booz & Company
Key Finding: R&D SPENDING HAS REACHED ITS HIGHEST
LEVEL EVER, BUT SPENDING GROWTH HAS SLOWED
COMPARED TO THE PREVIOUS TWO YEARS
GLOBAL INNOVATION 1000 R&D SPENDING
BILLIONS
$638
$603

11-year
CAGR = 5.5%

$521

$495

$353

2002

$369

$355

2003

1-year
growth
rate

0.6%

2004
3.7%

2005
6.2%

$450

$417

$391

2006
6.5%

$550
$503

2007
7.9%

2008
10.0%

2009
5.4%

2010
-3.5%

2011
9.3%

2012
9.6%

2013
5.8%

•	R&D spending by the Global Innovation 1000 companies reached $638 billion in 2013—the highest
level ever. This represents nearly half of all private and public sector R&D spending in the world.
•	After two consecutive years of high growth, this year’s growth rate of 5.8 percent (an increase of
$35 billion over 2012) is a return to the long-term growth trend.

“R&D spending is at
an all-time high, but
the return to the longterm growth trend of 5
to 6 percent per year
indicates sustainable
investment and
reflects overall
stability in the
market.”

—Barry Jaruzelski
Senior Partner, Booz & Company

4

Booz & Company
Key Finding: THE COMPUTING AND ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY
SPENT THE MOST ON R&D, BUT THE SOFTWARE AND INTERNET
INDUSTRY SAW THE GREATEST INCREASE IN SPENDING
2013 R&D SPENDING BY INDUSTRY

2%

3%

Aerospace and Defense

2%

Telecom

Other

4%

Consumer

27%

6%

Computing and
Electronics

Software and Internet

8%

Chemicals and Energy

$638
BILLION

10%

•	The three highest-spending
industries in 2013 were
computing and electronics,
healthcare, and automotive, the
same as in 2012.
•	Healthcare as well as computing
and electronics companies are
together responsible for almost
half of the R&D spending of the
Global Innovation 1000.

Industrials

22%

16%

Healthcare

Automotive

“The 22 percent boost in R&D spending in software
and Internet may be a sign that the tide is turning
in favor of technologies that run our increasingly
digitized world. In fact, software and Internet added
the greatest number of companies to this year’s
Global Innovation 1000 list.”

—Richard Holman
Partner, Booz & Company

CHANGE IN R&D SPENDING BY INDUSTRY
2012-2013; BILLIONS

$7.4

$3.4

$3.4

$2.6

$0.8

•	Fully 74 percent of the $35
billion spending increase this
year came from the software
and Internet (up $9.3 billion),
healthcare (up $9.2 billion),
and automotive (up $7.4 billion)
sectors.
•	Computing and electronics,
though the largest R&D
spender, increased its spending
by only $3.4 billion, making up
just 10 percent of the overall
spending increase.

$0.6

$0.1

$34.8
$-2.0

$9.2
Represents 74% of
growth in R&D spending

$9.3

Software
and
Internet

Healthcare

Automotive

Industrials

Computing
and
Electronics

Telecom

Increases
Decreases

Consumer

Other

Aerospace
and
Defense

Chemicals
and
Energy

Total

5

Booz & Company
Key Finding: R&D SPENDING WAS STILL CONCENTRATED
AT COMPANIES HEADQUARTED IN NORTH AMERICA AND
EUROPE, BUT GROWTH WAS ONCE AGAIN HIGHEST IN CHINA
2013 R&D SPENDING BY HEADQUARTER REGION

•	Companies headquartered in North America and
Europe continue to make up more than two-thirds
of the R&D spending of the Global Innovation 1000.

$638
BILLION
3.2%
6.9%
21.3%
29.6%
39.0%

•	China-based companies, though spending only 3.2
percent of all Global Innovation 1000 funds, have
been increasing R&D budgets far more rapidly
than those in North America or Europe. Chinese
companies’ share of global spending has risen
from 0.4 percent to 3.2 percent of the total between
2008 and 2013—a sevenfold rise.

China
Rest of World
Japan
Europe
North America

•	China-based companies increased their share of
revenue among the Global Innovation 1000 from
5.8 percent to 8.7 percent between 2008 and 2013,
a slower rise than their share of R&D spending, but
still a significant one.

CHANGE IN R&D SPENDING BY REGION
2012–2013
China

40

35.8%

Rest of
World

35

North
America

30

Europe
25
20

Japan

17.5%

15
10
5

“Over the past year, only
Japan reduced its total
R&D spending, the first
time any major country
has decreased its yearover-year spending
since the 2008 crash.
Even Europe increased
its R&D investment,
despite being mired in
recession.”

—John Loehr
Partner, Booz & Company

8.6%
Weighted
Average
5.8%

4.5%

0
-5

-3.6%

6

Booz & Company
Key Finding: FOR THE FOURTH YEAR, THE MOST
INNOVATIVE COMPANIES WEREN’T THE TOP SPENDERS
10 MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANIES IN 2013

Rank

Company

Industry

R&D Spending
(Billions)

Computing and Electronics

$3.4

Software and Internet

$6.8

Samsung

Computing and Electronics

$10.4

Amazon

Software and Internet

$4.6

3M

Industrials

$1.6

6th

GE

Industrials

$4.5

7th

Microsoft

Software and Internet

$9.8

8th

IBM

Computing and Electronics

$6.3

9th

Tesla

Automotive

$0.3

10th

Facebook

Software and Internet

$1.4

1st

Apple

2nd

Google

3rd
4th
5th

TOP 10 R&D SPENDERS IN 2013

Rank

Company

1st

Volkswagen

2nd

Samsung

3rd

Roche

4th

Intel

5th

Microsoft

6th

Industry

R&D Spending
(Billions)

Automotive

$11.4

Computing and Electronics

$10.2

Computing and Electronics

$10.1

Software and Internet

$9.8

Toyota

Automotive

$9.8

7th

Novartis

Healthcare

$9.3

8th

Merck

Healthcare

$8.2

9th

Pfizer

Healthcare

$7.9

10th

Johnson &
Johnson

Healthcare

—Barry Jaruzelski
Senior Partner, Booz & Company

$10.4

Healthcare

“For the ninth straight year, our
research has demonstrated that
there is no correlation between
how much you spend and how
well you perform over the long
term. It has been proven time and
time again that you can’t buy your
way to the top. When it comes to
innovation, how you spend is much
more important than how much
you spend.”

$7.7

•	Healthcare companies have consistently been on the top spenders list but have never made it on
the most innovative list.
•	Only two companies, Samsung and Microsoft, have been on both the most innovative and the
top spenders lists all four years.

7

Booz & Company
Key Finding: IT’S NOT WHAT YOU SPEND, IT’S HOW YOU
SPEND IT
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE 10 MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANIES* VS. TOP 10 R&D
SPENDERS
Lowest
Possible
Score: 0%

Normalized
Performance
of Industry
Peers: 50%

54%

10 Most Innovative Companies
Revenue Growth
(5-yr. CAGR)

Top 10 R&D Spenders

EBITDA as % of
Revenue
(5-yr. Avg.)

45%
71%

10 Most Innovative Companies

69%

Top 10 R&D Spenders

66%

10 Most Innovative Companies
Market Cap Growth
(5-yr. CAGR)

Top 10 R&D Spenders

Highest
Possible
Score: 100%

45%

“Not only do the largest spenders fail to
perform better than the most innovative
companies, they also lag behind the
average of their industry peers on the
Global Innovation 1000 list on both
revenue growth and market cap growth.”

—John Loehr
Partner, Booz & Company

* Only 8 of the 10 Most Innovative Companies were included in this analysis. Tesla and Facebook were removed as they did not have market cap  ata spanning back
d
5 years.

8

Booz  Company
Key Finding: COMPANIES ARE USING A MIX OF TRIED-ANDTRUE DIGITAL PRODUCTIVITY ENABLERS AND NEWER
MARKET AND CUSTOMER INSIGHT ENABLERS
THE DIGITAL TOOL LANDSCAPE
CUSTOMER INSIGHT

IDEATION

DEVELOPMENT

LAUNCH

Most Effective Tools

Customer immersion labs
Emerging, high-potential
way to simulate user
experiences

Rapid prototyping
(e.g, 3D printing)
Simulation tools
Co-design tools

Enhanced product lifecycle
management systems

Computer-aided design

Cutting-edge but
nascent tool monitors
engagement patterns

Interaction simulation
Project management

Big data tools
Visual simulation

Application development

Usage sensors

Customer profiling

Collaborative environments

Visualization and
engagement tools

Automated product
usage tools
Monitoring tools
Digital focus groups
E-commerce tracking

Vision narratives
Crowdsourcing

Social voting

Mashup tools

Automated marketing
platforms
Enterprise resource planning

Applications that
combine data aren’t
widely used, or useful

Community engagement
platforms

Idea capture tools
Customer sentiment
analysis

Customer relationship
management

Often used to research
the market, with
limited effectiveness

Automated feedback systems
Product sales simulation tools

Discussion platforms

Social media dashboards
Patent scanning

Least Effective

TYPE OF TOOL

Market and Customer Insight Enabler
Productivity Enabler

CIRCLE SIZE =

SCALE
Percent of
respondents
70%
using each tool
15%

•	Our survey results show that productivity enablers, used primarily in the development phase of
innovation, have reached maturity; most are widely used and effective.
•	In other phases, particularly the front end of the innovation process, companies are
experimenting with new market and customer insight enablers that have transformative potential.
But most tools aren’t widely used yet, and companies find their effectiveness varies wildly.
•	Among the most effective tools is 3D printing for rapid prototyping in the ideation phase of the
innovation process.
“There are many digital enablers out there. Productivity enablers have become must-haves
in any innovator’s digital tool kit. More and more companies are starting to use newer market
and customer insight enablers to create better and more inventive products. The right mix of
tools will depend on a company’s industry, capabilities, and innovation model.”

—Barry Jaruzelski
Senior Partner, Booz  Company

9

Booz  Company
Key Finding: DIGITAL ENABLERS APPEAR TO BOOST
PERFORMANCE WHEN USED SIGNIFICANTLY
USAGE OF DIGITAL ENABLERS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
+77%
PERCENTAGE
SAYING THEY
OUTPERFORM
COMPETITORS

“With all the talk out there about digital
enablers, more companies should be making
significant use of them. It’s good news for
innovation that some companies have found the
tools that contribute to higher performance—
the rest should follow their lead.”

53%

30%

—Richard Holman
Partner, Booz  Company

Low or Moderate
Usage of
Digital Enablers

Significant
Usage of
Digital Enablers

•	Companies from our survey allocated an average of 8.1 percent of their RD budgets to digital
tools, which when extrapolated to the Global Innovation 1000 companies adds up to $52 billion
of spending in 2013.
•	Less than half of respondents say their companies use digital enablers to a significant extent,
but those that do are 77 percent more likely to report that they financially outperform competitors
than are those that use enablers to a low or moderate extent.
•	Only 49 percent of respondents say their companies are spending on digital enablers that they
rated as highly effective.

ESTIMATED RD SPENDING ON DIGITAL ENABLERS BY INDUSTRY
15.0%
12.0%

HEIGHT =
Percent of
RD Budget
10.0%

7.9% 7.2%

7.1%
6.9%

AREA =
Amount Spent
(Billions)
$7.7

2.6

Software Aerospace
and
and
Internet
Defense

$13.8

Healthcare

8.6%
6.3%

1.7

$2.9

$4.7

Consumer Chemicals Industrials
and
Energy

$1

$6.5

Telecom Automotive

5.7%

$9.7

Computing and
Electronics

AVERAGE
8.1%

$0.9

Other

•	By industry, the percentage of RD budgets spent on digital enablers by our respondents varied,
as did the types of enablers used.
•	Aerospace and defense respondents, relied heavily on CAD software and visual simulation, whereas
respondents from the software and Internet sector made extensive use of social media—suitable
choices given the high development costs and levels of complexity of the aerospace and defense
industry and the business-to-consumer business model of the software and Internet sector.

10

Booz  Company
ABOUT THE AUTHORS

“We’ve proven time and again that the amount you spend on RD doesn’t
matter; how you spend it does. This year, we’ve seen that spending on
digital enablers matters.”

Barry Jaruzelski

barry.jaruzelski@booz.com
Barry Jaruzelski is a senior partner with Booz  Company in Florham Park, N.J., and the global leader of the firm’s engineered products and services practice. He created the Global Innovation 1000 study in 2005, and continues to lead the
research. He works with high-tech and industrial clients on corporate and product strategy and the transformation of core
innovation processes.

“Digital enablers are everywhere. Some have been around for a while,
others are new. To stay competitive, you’ll have to invest in both. Your best
competitors already have.”

Richard Holman

richard.holman@booz.com
Richard Holman is a partner with Booz  Company based in Florham Park, N.J. As a senior leader of the firm’s innovation
practice, he works with clients in highly engineered products sectors such as aerospace, industrials, high tech, and healthcare on innovation capability building, new product development efficiency and effectiveness, and product management.

“The front end of innovation is changing very quickly. Leading companies
are using – and building – powerful digital tools to discover and validate
what customers think, do, and need. Companies looking for an edge will
need to invest in these to better identify and meet market demands.”

John Loehr

john.loehr@booz.com
John Loehr is a partner with Booz  Company based in Chicago, and is the global leader of the firm’s innovation practice.
He works with automotive, industrial, and technology companies to help them build competitive innovation capabilities and
to resolve critical decisions in their product and market strategies.

11

Booz  Company
ABOUT THE GLOBAL INNOVATION 1000
As we have in each of the past eight editions of the Global Innovation 1000, this year Booz  Company identified the 1,000
public companies around the world that spent the most on RD during the last fiscal year, as of June 30, 2013. To be included,
companies had to make their RD spending numbers public. Subsidiaries that were more than 50 percent owned by a single
corporate parent during the period were excluded if their financial results were included in the parent company’s financials. The
Global Innovation 1000 companies collectively account for just under half of the entire world’s RD spending.
Methodology
In order to gain a more accurate and complete picture of innovation spending, Booz  Company made some adjustments to the
data collection process this year. In past years, both capitalized and amortized RD expenditures were excluded. This year, for
companies with capitalized RD expenditures, we included the most recent fiscal year’s amortization of those costs in calculating
the total RD investment, while continuing to exclude any non-amortized capitalized costs.
For each of the top 1,000 companies, we obtained from Bloomberg and Capital IQ the key financial metrics for 2008 through 2013,
including sales, gross profit, operating profit, net profit, historical RD expenditures, and market capitalization. All sales and RD
expenditure figures in foreign currencies were translated into U.S. dollars according to an average of the exchange rate over the
relevant period; for data on share prices, we used the exchange rate on the last day of the period.
All companies were coded into one of nine industry sectors (or “other”) according to Bloomberg’s industry designations, and into
one of five regional designations, as determined by their reported headquarters locations. To enable meaningful comparisons
across industries, the RD spending levels and financial performance metrics of each company were indexed against the average
values in its own industry.
Booz  Company conducted a separate online survey of nearly 400 innovation leaders at 350 companies around the world to
explore how their companies employ various digital enablers.

MEDIA CONTACTS
Abu Dhabi
Joanne Alam
+971-2-699-2400
joanne.alam@booz.com

New York City
Katrina Grochocki
+1-212-551-6415
katrina.grochocki@booz.com

Stockholm
Linda Wase
+46-8-506-190-12
linda.wase@contractors.booz.com

Amsterdam
Monique De Meyere
+31-20-504-1984
monique.demeyere@booz.com

Paris
Beatrice Malasset
+33-1-44-34-3131
beatrice.malasset@booz.com

Sydney
Kristine Anderson
+61-2-9321-1931
kristine.anderson@booz.com

London
Deirdre Flynn
+44-20-7393-3279
deirdre.flynn@booz.com

São Paulo
Deborah Frattini
+55-11-5501-6290
deborah.frattini@booz.com

Tokyo
Tomoko Hama
+81-3-6757-8683
tomoko.hama@booz.com

Munich
Davina Zenz-Spitzweg
+49-89-54525-559
davina.zenz-spitzweg@booz.com

Shanghai
Michelle Wang
+86-21-2327-9825
michelle.wang@booz.com

Zurich
Karla Schulze Osthoff
+41-43-268-2137
karla.schulzeosthoff@booz.com

ABOUT BOOZ  COMPANY
Booz  Company (booz.com) is a leading global management consulting firm focused on serving and shaping the
senior agenda of the world’s leading institutions. Drawing on the talents and insights of more than 3,000 people in
57 offices around the world, we help our clients achieve essential advantage by working with them to identify and
build the differentiating capabilities they need to outperform.
Download the full strategy+business article and view infographics,
our past studies, and more at www.booz.com/innovation1000.

More Related Content

More from Dmitry Tseitlin

State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016
State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016 State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016
State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016 Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Clarity from above PWC 2016
Clarity from above PWC 2016Clarity from above PWC 2016
Clarity from above PWC 2016Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011
Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011
Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015
Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015
Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015Dmitry Tseitlin
 
IGS Low cost access to space April 2016
IGS Low cost access to space April 2016IGS Low cost access to space April 2016
IGS Low cost access to space April 2016Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015
Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015
Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015Dmitry Tseitlin
 
A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...
A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...
A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...
Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...
Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...Dmitry Tseitlin
 
ESA - 2013 space transportation
ESA - 2013 space transportation ESA - 2013 space transportation
ESA - 2013 space transportation Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Результаты РФФИ 2015
Результаты РФФИ 2015 Результаты РФФИ 2015
Результаты РФФИ 2015 Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...
Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...
Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...
Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...
Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016
Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016
Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016Dmitry Tseitlin
 
WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015
WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015
WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015Dmitry Tseitlin
 
Agritech Funder Investing report 2015
Agritech Funder Investing report 2015Agritech Funder Investing report 2015
Agritech Funder Investing report 2015Dmitry Tseitlin
 
High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 Berkeley
High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 BerkeleyHigh technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 Berkeley
High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 BerkeleyDmitry Tseitlin
 
Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -
Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -
Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -Dmitry Tseitlin
 
NASA_CCO_status-2013 update
NASA_CCO_status-2013 updateNASA_CCO_status-2013 update
NASA_CCO_status-2013 updateDmitry Tseitlin
 
SolarCity Analysts Day_2015
SolarCity Analysts Day_2015SolarCity Analysts Day_2015
SolarCity Analysts Day_2015Dmitry Tseitlin
 

More from Dmitry Tseitlin (20)

Marinet en 2017
Marinet en 2017Marinet en 2017
Marinet en 2017
 
State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016
State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016 State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016
State of innovation Thomson Reuters 2016
 
Clarity from above PWC 2016
Clarity from above PWC 2016Clarity from above PWC 2016
Clarity from above PWC 2016
 
Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011
Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011
Отчет Фонд Сколково 25 апреля 2011
 
Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015
Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015
Technology roadmap highlights_report 2015
 
IGS Low cost access to space April 2016
IGS Low cost access to space April 2016IGS Low cost access to space April 2016
IGS Low cost access to space April 2016
 
Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015
Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015
Satellite technologies in UK agriculture 2015
 
A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...
A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...
A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight Philip Lubin Physics Dept, UC Santa Barbara ...
 
Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...
Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...
Постановление Правительства "О реализации национальной технологической иниц...
 
ESA - 2013 space transportation
ESA - 2013 space transportation ESA - 2013 space transportation
ESA - 2013 space transportation
 
Результаты РФФИ 2015
Результаты РФФИ 2015 Результаты РФФИ 2015
Результаты РФФИ 2015
 
Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...
Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...
Cоздание сверхтяжелых РН для исследования и освоения Луны и Марса - прошлое, ...
 
Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...
Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...
Ракета космического назначения «Зенит 3SL» для программы «Морской Старт» В.М...
 
Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016
Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016
Space Works Nano Microsatellite Market forecast 2016
 
WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015
WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015
WIPO Global Innovation Index 2015
 
Agritech Funder Investing report 2015
Agritech Funder Investing report 2015Agritech Funder Investing report 2015
Agritech Funder Investing report 2015
 
High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 Berkeley
High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 BerkeleyHigh technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 Berkeley
High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system. 2008 Berkeley
 
Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -
Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -
Start-up Space Tauri Group 2016 -
 
NASA_CCO_status-2013 update
NASA_CCO_status-2013 updateNASA_CCO_status-2013 update
NASA_CCO_status-2013 update
 
SolarCity Analysts Day_2015
SolarCity Analysts Day_2015SolarCity Analysts Day_2015
SolarCity Analysts Day_2015
 

Recently uploaded

New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr BaganFwdays
 
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easyCommit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easyAlfredo García Lavilla
 
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Scott Keck-Warren
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfGen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfAddepto
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationSlibray Presentation
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubKalema Edgar
 
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage CostLeverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage CostZilliz
 
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024Lonnie McRorey
 
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and ConsThe Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and ConsPixlogix Infotech
 
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024Lorenzo Miniero
 
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsScanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsRizwan Syed
 
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebDev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebUiPathCommunity
 
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionAdvanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionDilum Bandara
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLScyllaDB
 
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.Curtis Poe
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanDatabarracks
 

Recently uploaded (20)

New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
 
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
 
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easyCommit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
 
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
 
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfGen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
 
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special EditionDMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
 
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage CostLeverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
 
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
 
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and ConsThe Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
 
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
 
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsScanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
 
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebDev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
 
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionAdvanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
 
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
 

Booz co 2013-global-innovation-1000-study-navigating-the-digital-future_media-report

  • 1. HIGHLIGHTS FROM The 2013 Global Innovation 1000 Study NAVIGATING THE DIGITAL FUTURE Download the full strategy+business article and view infographics, our past studies, and more at www.booz.com/innovation1000.
  • 2. THE 2013 GLOBAL INNOVATION 1000 STUDY SNAPSHOT Booz & Company’s ninth annual study of innovation trends and spending shows that R&D investment at the public companies that were the 1,000 biggest spenders globally reached the highest level ever this year, US$638 billion. However, after two years of more than 9 percent growth post-recession, this year’s spending growth of 5.8 percent is a return to the long-term trend. Apple, Google, and 3M have been at the top of the global “Most Innovative Companies” ranking for the last three years, but this year Samsung has overtaken 3M to claim the third spot. Amazon has also made a significant move, leaping six spots into fourth place this year. Tesla joins the list for the first time, and Facebook makes a return after a year’s hiatus, while Toyota and P&G have fallen farther down the list. This year, we also surveyed the use of digital tools at 350 companies around the world. On average, we found that 8.1 percent of R&D spending is being allocated to digital enablers, from familiar project management software to the newest crowdsourcing and collaborative design tools. The tried-and-true productivity enablers are must-haves in the innovator’s digital tool kit. But many companies have started to also use digital enablers to develop market and customer insights. The benefits are measurable: The heaviest users of digital tools are 77 percent more likely to report that their companies financially outperform the competition. CHANGES IN THE 10 MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANIES 2010 2011 2012 2013 1st Apple Apple Apple Apple 2nd Google Google Google Google 3rd 3M 3M 3M Samsung 4th GE GE Samsung Amazon 5th Toyota Microsoft GE 3M 6th Microsoft IBM Microsoft GE 7th P&G Samsung Toyota Microsoft 8th IBM P&G P&G 9th Samsung Toyota IBM 10th Intel Facebook Amazon Tie IBM Tesla Facebook 2 Booz & Company
  • 3. KEY FINDINGS OF THE 2013 GLOBAL INNOVATION 1000 STUDY R&D Spending [read more] • R&D spending among the top 1,000 spenders globally reached an all-time high of $638 billion in 2013, an increase of 5.8 percent from 2012, compared to 9 percent-plus growth in the two previous years. • China’s R&D spending increase of 35.8 percent this year was the highest of any region, but it is the second lowest increase for China over the past five years, likely a reflection of the country’s slowing economic expansion. • R&D spending was once again highest in dollar terms at North American companies ($248 billion, an 8.6 percent increase over last year). And Europe’s R&D spending ($189 billion, a 4.5 percent increase from 2012) continues to be the second-highest. • The computing and electronics industry spent the most on R&D in dollar terms ($170 billion); the software and Internet sector saw the highest percentage increase in spending (22.1 percent, or $9.3 billion). Performance Drivers [read more] • For the ninth year in a row, we have found no correlation between how much companies spend on R&D and their financial performance. • How companies spend their innovation dollars is much more important. Our studies have consistently shown that innovation investments in select capabilities, tools, talent, and culture which are tightly aligned with a business’s strategy are what drive sustained success. Navigating the Digital Future [read more] • Respondents to our survey say their companies are using a mix of digital tools: tried-and-true productivity enablers and newer market and customer insight enablers. The right mix, which many are still struggling to find, depends on a company’s industry, capabilities, and innovation model. • On average, our survey respondents say their companies spend 8.1 percent of their R&D budgets on digital enablers. • Less than half of respondents say they use digital enablers to a significant extent, but those that do are 77 percent more likely to report that they financially outperform competitors than are those who use them to a low or moderate extent. Digital enabler: electronic tool, or process supported by an electronic tool, that improves speed, cost, quality and/or complexity. Examples relating to innovation: visual simulation, rapid prototyping/3D printing, computer-aided design, customer relationship management system. 3 Booz & Company
  • 4. Key Finding: R&D SPENDING HAS REACHED ITS HIGHEST LEVEL EVER, BUT SPENDING GROWTH HAS SLOWED COMPARED TO THE PREVIOUS TWO YEARS GLOBAL INNOVATION 1000 R&D SPENDING BILLIONS $638 $603 11-year CAGR = 5.5% $521 $495 $353 2002 $369 $355 2003 1-year growth rate 0.6% 2004 3.7% 2005 6.2% $450 $417 $391 2006 6.5% $550 $503 2007 7.9% 2008 10.0% 2009 5.4% 2010 -3.5% 2011 9.3% 2012 9.6% 2013 5.8% • R&D spending by the Global Innovation 1000 companies reached $638 billion in 2013—the highest level ever. This represents nearly half of all private and public sector R&D spending in the world. • After two consecutive years of high growth, this year’s growth rate of 5.8 percent (an increase of $35 billion over 2012) is a return to the long-term growth trend. “R&D spending is at an all-time high, but the return to the longterm growth trend of 5 to 6 percent per year indicates sustainable investment and reflects overall stability in the market.” —Barry Jaruzelski Senior Partner, Booz & Company 4 Booz & Company
  • 5. Key Finding: THE COMPUTING AND ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY SPENT THE MOST ON R&D, BUT THE SOFTWARE AND INTERNET INDUSTRY SAW THE GREATEST INCREASE IN SPENDING 2013 R&D SPENDING BY INDUSTRY 2% 3% Aerospace and Defense 2% Telecom Other 4% Consumer 27% 6% Computing and Electronics Software and Internet 8% Chemicals and Energy $638 BILLION 10% • The three highest-spending industries in 2013 were computing and electronics, healthcare, and automotive, the same as in 2012. • Healthcare as well as computing and electronics companies are together responsible for almost half of the R&D spending of the Global Innovation 1000. Industrials 22% 16% Healthcare Automotive “The 22 percent boost in R&D spending in software and Internet may be a sign that the tide is turning in favor of technologies that run our increasingly digitized world. In fact, software and Internet added the greatest number of companies to this year’s Global Innovation 1000 list.” —Richard Holman Partner, Booz & Company CHANGE IN R&D SPENDING BY INDUSTRY 2012-2013; BILLIONS $7.4 $3.4 $3.4 $2.6 $0.8 • Fully 74 percent of the $35 billion spending increase this year came from the software and Internet (up $9.3 billion), healthcare (up $9.2 billion), and automotive (up $7.4 billion) sectors. • Computing and electronics, though the largest R&D spender, increased its spending by only $3.4 billion, making up just 10 percent of the overall spending increase. $0.6 $0.1 $34.8 $-2.0 $9.2 Represents 74% of growth in R&D spending $9.3 Software and Internet Healthcare Automotive Industrials Computing and Electronics Telecom Increases Decreases Consumer Other Aerospace and Defense Chemicals and Energy Total 5 Booz & Company
  • 6. Key Finding: R&D SPENDING WAS STILL CONCENTRATED AT COMPANIES HEADQUARTED IN NORTH AMERICA AND EUROPE, BUT GROWTH WAS ONCE AGAIN HIGHEST IN CHINA 2013 R&D SPENDING BY HEADQUARTER REGION • Companies headquartered in North America and Europe continue to make up more than two-thirds of the R&D spending of the Global Innovation 1000. $638 BILLION 3.2% 6.9% 21.3% 29.6% 39.0% • China-based companies, though spending only 3.2 percent of all Global Innovation 1000 funds, have been increasing R&D budgets far more rapidly than those in North America or Europe. Chinese companies’ share of global spending has risen from 0.4 percent to 3.2 percent of the total between 2008 and 2013—a sevenfold rise. China Rest of World Japan Europe North America • China-based companies increased their share of revenue among the Global Innovation 1000 from 5.8 percent to 8.7 percent between 2008 and 2013, a slower rise than their share of R&D spending, but still a significant one. CHANGE IN R&D SPENDING BY REGION 2012–2013 China 40 35.8% Rest of World 35 North America 30 Europe 25 20 Japan 17.5% 15 10 5 “Over the past year, only Japan reduced its total R&D spending, the first time any major country has decreased its yearover-year spending since the 2008 crash. Even Europe increased its R&D investment, despite being mired in recession.” —John Loehr Partner, Booz & Company 8.6% Weighted Average 5.8% 4.5% 0 -5 -3.6% 6 Booz & Company
  • 7. Key Finding: FOR THE FOURTH YEAR, THE MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANIES WEREN’T THE TOP SPENDERS 10 MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANIES IN 2013 Rank Company Industry R&D Spending (Billions) Computing and Electronics $3.4 Software and Internet $6.8 Samsung Computing and Electronics $10.4 Amazon Software and Internet $4.6 3M Industrials $1.6 6th GE Industrials $4.5 7th Microsoft Software and Internet $9.8 8th IBM Computing and Electronics $6.3 9th Tesla Automotive $0.3 10th Facebook Software and Internet $1.4 1st Apple 2nd Google 3rd 4th 5th TOP 10 R&D SPENDERS IN 2013 Rank Company 1st Volkswagen 2nd Samsung 3rd Roche 4th Intel 5th Microsoft 6th Industry R&D Spending (Billions) Automotive $11.4 Computing and Electronics $10.2 Computing and Electronics $10.1 Software and Internet $9.8 Toyota Automotive $9.8 7th Novartis Healthcare $9.3 8th Merck Healthcare $8.2 9th Pfizer Healthcare $7.9 10th Johnson & Johnson Healthcare —Barry Jaruzelski Senior Partner, Booz & Company $10.4 Healthcare “For the ninth straight year, our research has demonstrated that there is no correlation between how much you spend and how well you perform over the long term. It has been proven time and time again that you can’t buy your way to the top. When it comes to innovation, how you spend is much more important than how much you spend.” $7.7 • Healthcare companies have consistently been on the top spenders list but have never made it on the most innovative list. • Only two companies, Samsung and Microsoft, have been on both the most innovative and the top spenders lists all four years. 7 Booz & Company
  • 8. Key Finding: IT’S NOT WHAT YOU SPEND, IT’S HOW YOU SPEND IT FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE 10 MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANIES* VS. TOP 10 R&D SPENDERS Lowest Possible Score: 0% Normalized Performance of Industry Peers: 50% 54% 10 Most Innovative Companies Revenue Growth (5-yr. CAGR) Top 10 R&D Spenders EBITDA as % of Revenue (5-yr. Avg.) 45% 71% 10 Most Innovative Companies 69% Top 10 R&D Spenders 66% 10 Most Innovative Companies Market Cap Growth (5-yr. CAGR) Top 10 R&D Spenders Highest Possible Score: 100% 45% “Not only do the largest spenders fail to perform better than the most innovative companies, they also lag behind the average of their industry peers on the Global Innovation 1000 list on both revenue growth and market cap growth.” —John Loehr Partner, Booz & Company * Only 8 of the 10 Most Innovative Companies were included in this analysis. Tesla and Facebook were removed as they did not have market cap ata spanning back d 5 years. 8 Booz Company
  • 9. Key Finding: COMPANIES ARE USING A MIX OF TRIED-ANDTRUE DIGITAL PRODUCTIVITY ENABLERS AND NEWER MARKET AND CUSTOMER INSIGHT ENABLERS THE DIGITAL TOOL LANDSCAPE CUSTOMER INSIGHT IDEATION DEVELOPMENT LAUNCH Most Effective Tools Customer immersion labs Emerging, high-potential way to simulate user experiences Rapid prototyping (e.g, 3D printing) Simulation tools Co-design tools Enhanced product lifecycle management systems Computer-aided design Cutting-edge but nascent tool monitors engagement patterns Interaction simulation Project management Big data tools Visual simulation Application development Usage sensors Customer profiling Collaborative environments Visualization and engagement tools Automated product usage tools Monitoring tools Digital focus groups E-commerce tracking Vision narratives Crowdsourcing Social voting Mashup tools Automated marketing platforms Enterprise resource planning Applications that combine data aren’t widely used, or useful Community engagement platforms Idea capture tools Customer sentiment analysis Customer relationship management Often used to research the market, with limited effectiveness Automated feedback systems Product sales simulation tools Discussion platforms Social media dashboards Patent scanning Least Effective TYPE OF TOOL Market and Customer Insight Enabler Productivity Enabler CIRCLE SIZE = SCALE Percent of respondents 70% using each tool 15% • Our survey results show that productivity enablers, used primarily in the development phase of innovation, have reached maturity; most are widely used and effective. • In other phases, particularly the front end of the innovation process, companies are experimenting with new market and customer insight enablers that have transformative potential. But most tools aren’t widely used yet, and companies find their effectiveness varies wildly. • Among the most effective tools is 3D printing for rapid prototyping in the ideation phase of the innovation process. “There are many digital enablers out there. Productivity enablers have become must-haves in any innovator’s digital tool kit. More and more companies are starting to use newer market and customer insight enablers to create better and more inventive products. The right mix of tools will depend on a company’s industry, capabilities, and innovation model.” —Barry Jaruzelski Senior Partner, Booz Company 9 Booz Company
  • 10. Key Finding: DIGITAL ENABLERS APPEAR TO BOOST PERFORMANCE WHEN USED SIGNIFICANTLY USAGE OF DIGITAL ENABLERS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE +77% PERCENTAGE SAYING THEY OUTPERFORM COMPETITORS “With all the talk out there about digital enablers, more companies should be making significant use of them. It’s good news for innovation that some companies have found the tools that contribute to higher performance— the rest should follow their lead.” 53% 30% —Richard Holman Partner, Booz Company Low or Moderate Usage of Digital Enablers Significant Usage of Digital Enablers • Companies from our survey allocated an average of 8.1 percent of their RD budgets to digital tools, which when extrapolated to the Global Innovation 1000 companies adds up to $52 billion of spending in 2013. • Less than half of respondents say their companies use digital enablers to a significant extent, but those that do are 77 percent more likely to report that they financially outperform competitors than are those that use enablers to a low or moderate extent. • Only 49 percent of respondents say their companies are spending on digital enablers that they rated as highly effective. ESTIMATED RD SPENDING ON DIGITAL ENABLERS BY INDUSTRY 15.0% 12.0% HEIGHT = Percent of RD Budget 10.0% 7.9% 7.2% 7.1% 6.9% AREA = Amount Spent (Billions) $7.7 2.6 Software Aerospace and and Internet Defense $13.8 Healthcare 8.6% 6.3% 1.7 $2.9 $4.7 Consumer Chemicals Industrials and Energy $1 $6.5 Telecom Automotive 5.7% $9.7 Computing and Electronics AVERAGE 8.1% $0.9 Other • By industry, the percentage of RD budgets spent on digital enablers by our respondents varied, as did the types of enablers used. • Aerospace and defense respondents, relied heavily on CAD software and visual simulation, whereas respondents from the software and Internet sector made extensive use of social media—suitable choices given the high development costs and levels of complexity of the aerospace and defense industry and the business-to-consumer business model of the software and Internet sector. 10 Booz Company
  • 11. ABOUT THE AUTHORS “We’ve proven time and again that the amount you spend on RD doesn’t matter; how you spend it does. This year, we’ve seen that spending on digital enablers matters.” Barry Jaruzelski barry.jaruzelski@booz.com Barry Jaruzelski is a senior partner with Booz Company in Florham Park, N.J., and the global leader of the firm’s engineered products and services practice. He created the Global Innovation 1000 study in 2005, and continues to lead the research. He works with high-tech and industrial clients on corporate and product strategy and the transformation of core innovation processes. “Digital enablers are everywhere. Some have been around for a while, others are new. To stay competitive, you’ll have to invest in both. Your best competitors already have.” Richard Holman richard.holman@booz.com Richard Holman is a partner with Booz Company based in Florham Park, N.J. As a senior leader of the firm’s innovation practice, he works with clients in highly engineered products sectors such as aerospace, industrials, high tech, and healthcare on innovation capability building, new product development efficiency and effectiveness, and product management. “The front end of innovation is changing very quickly. Leading companies are using – and building – powerful digital tools to discover and validate what customers think, do, and need. Companies looking for an edge will need to invest in these to better identify and meet market demands.” John Loehr john.loehr@booz.com John Loehr is a partner with Booz Company based in Chicago, and is the global leader of the firm’s innovation practice. He works with automotive, industrial, and technology companies to help them build competitive innovation capabilities and to resolve critical decisions in their product and market strategies. 11 Booz Company
  • 12. ABOUT THE GLOBAL INNOVATION 1000 As we have in each of the past eight editions of the Global Innovation 1000, this year Booz Company identified the 1,000 public companies around the world that spent the most on RD during the last fiscal year, as of June 30, 2013. To be included, companies had to make their RD spending numbers public. Subsidiaries that were more than 50 percent owned by a single corporate parent during the period were excluded if their financial results were included in the parent company’s financials. The Global Innovation 1000 companies collectively account for just under half of the entire world’s RD spending. Methodology In order to gain a more accurate and complete picture of innovation spending, Booz Company made some adjustments to the data collection process this year. In past years, both capitalized and amortized RD expenditures were excluded. This year, for companies with capitalized RD expenditures, we included the most recent fiscal year’s amortization of those costs in calculating the total RD investment, while continuing to exclude any non-amortized capitalized costs. For each of the top 1,000 companies, we obtained from Bloomberg and Capital IQ the key financial metrics for 2008 through 2013, including sales, gross profit, operating profit, net profit, historical RD expenditures, and market capitalization. All sales and RD expenditure figures in foreign currencies were translated into U.S. dollars according to an average of the exchange rate over the relevant period; for data on share prices, we used the exchange rate on the last day of the period. All companies were coded into one of nine industry sectors (or “other”) according to Bloomberg’s industry designations, and into one of five regional designations, as determined by their reported headquarters locations. To enable meaningful comparisons across industries, the RD spending levels and financial performance metrics of each company were indexed against the average values in its own industry. Booz Company conducted a separate online survey of nearly 400 innovation leaders at 350 companies around the world to explore how their companies employ various digital enablers. MEDIA CONTACTS Abu Dhabi Joanne Alam +971-2-699-2400 joanne.alam@booz.com New York City Katrina Grochocki +1-212-551-6415 katrina.grochocki@booz.com Stockholm Linda Wase +46-8-506-190-12 linda.wase@contractors.booz.com Amsterdam Monique De Meyere +31-20-504-1984 monique.demeyere@booz.com Paris Beatrice Malasset +33-1-44-34-3131 beatrice.malasset@booz.com Sydney Kristine Anderson +61-2-9321-1931 kristine.anderson@booz.com London Deirdre Flynn +44-20-7393-3279 deirdre.flynn@booz.com São Paulo Deborah Frattini +55-11-5501-6290 deborah.frattini@booz.com Tokyo Tomoko Hama +81-3-6757-8683 tomoko.hama@booz.com Munich Davina Zenz-Spitzweg +49-89-54525-559 davina.zenz-spitzweg@booz.com Shanghai Michelle Wang +86-21-2327-9825 michelle.wang@booz.com Zurich Karla Schulze Osthoff +41-43-268-2137 karla.schulzeosthoff@booz.com ABOUT BOOZ COMPANY Booz Company (booz.com) is a leading global management consulting firm focused on serving and shaping the senior agenda of the world’s leading institutions. Drawing on the talents and insights of more than 3,000 people in 57 offices around the world, we help our clients achieve essential advantage by working with them to identify and build the differentiating capabilities they need to outperform. Download the full strategy+business article and view infographics, our past studies, and more at www.booz.com/innovation1000.