Pathogens in the Twilight Zone: Update on emerging disease issues with implications for the pork industry - Dr. Peter Davies, University of Minnesota, from the 2011 The Allen D. Leman Swine Conference, September 17-20, 2011, St Paul, MN, USA.
Dr. Peter Davies - Pathogens in the Twilight Zone: Update on emerging disease issues with implications for the pork industry
1. PATHOGENS
iN
Peter Davies BVSc,
PhD
University of Minnesota
2. Emerging diseases in intensive livestock
production
Media
Shoot first – ask questions later (maybe)
Blogosphere
Just shoot and ask no questions
Move on to next ‘crisis’
Guilty until proven innocent
Habitual overstatement of public health risks
2
3. Diseases in the twilight zone
BSE
Model prediction up to 50,000 human deaths from
variant CJD
Lower limit of 5,000
Global tally after 15 years is around 200.
H5N1 avian influenza
Guesstimates up to 150 million circulated
564 Laboratory confirmed cases (August 9, 2011)
330 fatalities.
3
4. Discovery vs. emergence
Conventional microbiology reveals the tip of the
iceberg
Today have very powerful diagnostic tools
Closely related hosts (mammals, homeotherms) likely
to be colonized by ‘closely related’ organisms
Discovery involves much uncertainty
Interspecies transmission
Virulence in various species
4
5. Diseases in the twilight zone
Influenza viruses
MRSA
Clostridium difficile
Noroviruses
Sapoviruses
Intestinal spirochetes
….
5
6. Recent Emerging Disease Issues in Swine
What Where When* Swine Health* Human Media
Health* hype*
Clostridium difficile (pigs) Global 1986 +/- ++(?) ++
PRRS Global 1987 +++++ - -
Salmonella typhimurium DT104 Global 1993 +/- ++ ++++
PCV2 Global 1996 +++++ - -
Hepatitis E infection USA/global 1995 - +/- +/-
Menangle virus Australia 1997 + +/- -
Nipah virus Malaysia 1998 ++ ++ ++
Bungowannah virus Australia 2003 + - -
MRSA ST398 EU/global 2004 - +/- +++++
virulent Streptococcus suis type 2 China 2005 ? ++ ++
H1N1 pandemic influenza Global 2009 + ++++(?) +++++
7. Recent Emerging Disease Issues in Swine
W Where When* Swine Health* Human Media
Health* hype*
Clostridium difficile (pigs) Global 1986 +/- ++(?) ++
PRRS Global 1987 +++++ - -
Salmonella typhimurium DT104 Global 1993 +/- ++ ++++
PCV2 Global 1996 +++++ - -
Hepatitis E infection USA/global 1995 - +/- +/-
Menangle virus Australia 1997 + +/- -
Nipah virus Malaysia 1998 ++ ++ ++
Bungowannah virus Australia 2003 + - -
MRSA ST398 EU/global 2004 - +/- +++++
virulent Streptococcus suis type 2 China 2005 ? ++ ++
H1N1 pandemic influenza Global 2009 + ++++(?) +++++
8. S. aureus and C. difficile
Common commensals found in healthy people and animals
Opportunistic pathogens increasing in incidence and clinical
severity
Recognized human pathogens long before animal reservoirs
thought of epidemiological significance.
Important nosocomial agents - hospital infections principal
concern
Community acquired infections more important in recent
years.
Animal colonization raises risk of livestock as sources of
community acquired infections.
Both isolated from pork
10. PFGE with the SmaI enzyme
Soge et al. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2009;64:1148-1155
MRSA isolated from
US West Coast public marine beaches
11. Holland – an issue emerges!
Very low MRSA prevalence
‘Search and destroy’ policy
Intensive screening and typing with sma1 PFGE
2004: 6mo girl screened before for surgery for a
congenital heart defect
MRSA isolate not typable with Sma1 PFGE
2 other screening isolates not typable by Sma1 PFGE
All 3 ‘cases’ epidemiologically linked to pigs
Studies of MRSA prevalence in pigs, farmers and pork
11
12. S. aureus subtyping
‘Livestock associated’
PFGE Sma1 Untypable
MLST ST398 (CC398)
SCCmec typing (I – VIII) III, IV, V
Spa typing
Ridom t034, t011, t108……...
egenomics 539, ………………..…..
12
13. MRSA in market hogs (de Neeling et al,
2006)
National survey of slaughter pigs in Holland
39% of 540 pigs positive (nasal swabs)
44 of 54 (81%) of farms positive
All isolates a ‘single clonal group’
Nontypable (NT) by sma1 PFGE
MLST: ST 398
3 closely related spa types predominant (t011, t108, t1254,…)
Panton-Valentine Leucocidin (PVL) toxin negative
Uniformly resistant to tetracycline
Use of tetracyclines may be selecting for MRSA?
13
14. Colonization of farm workers
ST398 also isolated from pig farmers (Voss et al 2005)
23% of farmers positive on nasal swab
760x general population prevalence
Dutch health authorities changed MRSA screening
procedures
People exposed to pigs and calves considered high risk
Isolated and screened before hospital admission
ST398 MRSA isolated from pork (van Loo et al.,
2007)
14
16. MRSA spa types in swine barn dust (EFSA, 2010)
Predominant in North America
*
17. ST398 MRSA
Not just a pig problem!
Pigs – widespread (but not China, UK, Ireland, Japan)
ST9
Calves – Holland
Horses – Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Holland,
Canada
Chickens – Belgium
Dogs – Austria, Canada
Lack of host specifity may indicate zoonotic risk!
17
18. MRSA in pigs in Ontario
(Khanna et al, 2007)
Convenience sample of 20 Ontario herds
25% (71/285) of pigs positive
20% (5 of 25) farmers positive
Predominant (75%) spa types similar to ST398
Dutch isolates
Spa type t034 predominant
18
19. Livestock associated MRSA in USA
Two farms in Iowa (Smith 2007)
One positive – 70% of pigs (ST398)
Slaughter pigs (Davies et al, 2009)
539 pigs from 45 farms
25% of pigs MRSA positive
Diverse spa types - t034 predominant
19
20. Prevalence and characterization of MRSA in
pigs and farm workers on conventional and
antibiotic free swine farms in the USA
Collaborative Study – National Pork Board
54 farms across 3 centers (MN, IA-IL, OH_NC)
18 farms per state
9 conventional, 9 antibiotic free
24 pigs per farm; any human volunteers
Difficulties in finding farms
45 farms enrolled (24 conv., 21 ABF)
1084 pigs; 154 people
20
21. MRSA on conventional and ABF swine farms
MRSA detected in pigs on 4 farms
All 4 conventional farms in IA-IL
All pigs negative in ABF farms
45 (4.2%) of 1084 pigs positive
29 (18.8%) of 154 people positive
24 of 40 (60%) people positive on two farms with
highest pig prevalence
21
22. MRSA on conventional and ABF swine farms
32 spa type 539/t034
2 spa type 2/NT
2 other ‘LA’ (t011; t571
23. MRSA in farm workers on conventional and
ABF swine farms
17 spa type 539/t034
5 spa type 2/NT Not LA type 539/t034
1 other
23
24. MSSA isolates in MN
98 isolates of MSSA characterized in MN
92 from pigs, 6 from people
Pig samples clustered on 4 farms (3 conv., 1 ABF)
65 (71%) of pigs isolates were spa type 539/t034
1 isolate from human
24
25. Summary
MRSA detected in market hogs and
occupationally exposed people
Spa type 539/t034 predominant
Spa type 2/tunknown also detected in all studies
Similar to Canada
Lack of knowledge of S. aureus epidemiology in
pigs
Spa type 539/t034 in MN
25
26. Exposure assessment – ST398
High risk of exposure in groups with direct
livestock contact
Major concerns about occupational risk
Some exposure risk to direct family members
Currently no indication of significant community
exposure
26
27. Risk assessment
Consequences of occupational exposure
Colonization vs. Infection
What is the burden of disease?
Virulence
Transmission
Diversity within ST398 lineage
Animal vs. human isolates
27
29. Current and future studies
Epidemiology of S. aureus in multiple site pig
farms (NPB)
MRSA colonization and infection in swine
veterinarians (NIOSH)
70 ‘volunteers’
Study duration of colonization over 18 months
Prospective study of infection risk
29
30. Occupational exposure
Consistent observations that people with
occupational exposure to animal species more likely
to be colonized with MRSA
As yet minimal data indicating increased risk of infection
Interspecies transmission of S. aureus
Frequency, Quantity, Duration
Burden of disease
Primarily occupational?
30
31. 45
40 Clinical cases = 122
35 Invasive = 27
30
25
Burden of disease 20
15
from ST398 MRSA
10
5
0
Ca m
De la nd
Be ina
Sc ong
nd
n
ng da
G a rk
Au y
ria
en
Sw ly
ai
an
iu
Ita
Ho na
la
ed
st
Ch
Sp
nm
lg
K
m
l
ot
Ho
er
Many reports don’t distinguish infection from
colonization
Small number of serious infections
Retrospective study of human isolates in Canada
5 ST398 out of 3,687 (4 skin/soft tissue infections)
CDC has examined >12,000 isolates
ST398 had not identified in a human clinical case
Current evidence suggests low pathogenicity?
31
32. Lethal pneumonia caused by an ST398
S. aureus strain Rasigade et al (2010)
Observations
Fatal necrotizing pneumonia in a previously healthy 14yo girl
ST 398 - spa type t571
PVL positive
Tetracycline susceptible
Methicillin susceptible (MSSA)
No livestock contact
Inference
“spread of S. aureus ST398 among livestock is a matter of
increasing concern because strains of this sequence type were
able to acquire PVL genes”
32
34. “One Health” means
more than one inference
‘.. concern because strains ST398 strains were
able to acquire PVL genes’
But….
Livestock strains almost uniformly tetracycline resistant
and PVL negative
Spa type t571 uncommon in animal isolates
Could adaptation of ST398 to livestock hosts
include loss of human virulence factors
34
35. The rest of the story
Davies et al, EID June 2011
t571 ST398 MSSA detected in 9 families from the Dominican
Republic living in Manhattan
with no apparent contact with livestock (Bhat et al., 2007)
t571 the sole MSSA spa type in Dutch study of ST398 clinical
isolates, including 3 independent cases of nosocomial
bacteremia
with no apparent livestock contact (van Belkum et al., 2008)
t571 the predominant (11%) MSSA type at a Beijing hospital
Livestock contact unlikely (Chen et al 2010)
35
36. Emergence of unusual bloodstream infections associated
with pig-borne-like Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in
France. (van de Marquet et al., 2011)
Study of t571 MSSA strains from cases of bloodstream
infections in France
The 30 isolates differed from pig-borne strains
Isolates shared similarities with strains from humans in
China and virulent USA300 strains
36
37. The rest of the story……
Understanding LA-MRSA is embryonic
Naïve perceptions of complex epidemiology
All MRSA found in livestock are ST398
Livestock are the only reservoirs of ST398
ST398 isolates of diverse genotype and geographic origin
may also be epidemiologically distinct
Requires systematic investigation of S. aureus
epidemiology in animals and humans.
37
38. Community dissemination of MRSA ST398
Cuny et al (2009)
Study of German farming community where
MRSA ST398 prevalent on pig farms
Nasal swabs from
Pig farmers and family members
Swine vets and family members
462 pupils (10 to 16 yo) in villages in the high density
pig farming area
38
39. Nasal colonization with ST 398
Cuny et al (2009)
Group N Pct Pos
Pig farmers 113 86% Prevalence
Ratio= 20
Farmer family members 116 4.3%
Swine Veterinarians 18 45% Prevalence
Ratio= 5
Vet family members 44 9%
Schoolchildren* 462 0.007% (3)
*All 3 positive children lived on pig farms 39
40. Communities in pig dense areas in Holland
(van Cleef 2010)
Mailing in 3 selected municipalities in the Netherlands
where livestock MRSA prevalent
Adults complete questionnaire and nose swab (n = 583)
One of 534 persons without livestock-contact positive (0.2%)
13 of 49 of farm residents/workers positive (26.5%)
Conclusions:
High prevalence of livestock-associated MRSA in people with
direct contact with farm animals.
Not spread into the wider community
40
41. Exposure assessment – ST398
High risk of exposure in groups with direct
livestock contact
Major concerns about occupational risk
Some exposure risk to direct family members
Currently no indication of significant community
exposure
41
42. Risk assessment
Consequences of occupational exposure
Colonization vs. Infection
What is the burden of disease?
Virulence
Transmission
42
43. Transmission of ST398 MRSA among people
Studies of transmission in Dutch hospitals (Bootsma, 2010)
ST398 is 5.9 times less transmissible than non-ST398 MRSA
in Dutch hospitals’
‘Spreading capacity per admission insufficient to lead to an
epidemic’
‘Nosocomial transmission of ST398 MRSA is 72% less
likely than non-ST398 MRSA strains’
Wassenberg (2011)
43
44. Distribution of LA MRSA and other MRSA clinical
isolates in Europe (van Cleef et al., 2011)
44
45. Diversity of genome of human and LA ST398
MRSA strains (Hallin et al., 2011)
‘LA-MRSA strains represent a homogenous
lineage distinct from co-local HA- and CA-MRSA
strains
characterized by a lack of human-associated virulence
and adhesion determinants
Absence of detectable enterotoxin gene among
ST398 LA-MRSA strains from a wide host range
is reassuring regarding their foodborne
pathogenic potential.’
45
46. Duration of colonization
Research workers (short term exposure) van Cleef et al (2011)
33 of 199 exposures led to positive culture on farm
Only 3 of 33 retested positive after 24 hours
Evidence suggests most short term exposure leads to short
term ‘colonization’
Veal farmers in Holland Graveland et al (2011)
Rapid decline in prevalence during absence of animal contact
LA-MRSA poor persistent colonizers in most humans.
46
Notas do Editor
PFGE with the SmaI enzyme of MRSA and MSSA. PFGE pattern A: lane 1, MRSA 10-55; and lane 2, MSSA 10-51. PFGE type B: lane 3, MRSA 9-48. PFGE type C: lane 4, MRSA 10-579; and lane 5, MSSA 10-578. PFGE type D: lane 6, MRSA OSS143-7; lane 7, MSSA OSS143-6; and lane 8, MSSA 11-31. Lane 9, MW standards.