SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 38
TBL
Task Based Learning
What is Task Based Learning
• Task-based language learning
(TBLL), also known as task-based language
teaching (TBLT) or task-based instruction (TBI) focuses on
the use of authentic language and on asking students to
do meaningful tasks using the target language. Such tasks
can include visiting a doctor, conducting an interview, or
calling customer service for help. Assessment is primarily
based on task outcome (in other words the appropriate
completion of tasks) rather than on accuracy of language
forms. This makes TBLL especially popular for developing
target language fluency and student confidence.
Definition of a Task
• According to Rod Ellis (2007), a task has four
main characteristics:
• A task involves a primary focus on (pragmatic)
meaning.
• A task has some kind of ‘gap’.
• The participants choose the linguistic
resources needed to complete the task.
• A task has a clearly defined outcome.
Historical Background
• Task-Based Learning, one of the most talked-
about recent methods, can be traced back to
the ‘strong’ Communicative Approach, where
teaching is done entirely through
communicative tasks. There is no set grammar
syllabus. Focusing on language use after a task
has been completed is widely accepted as an
aid to acquisition, and task repetition gives
students the chance to practice new language.
The Communicative Approach
• The Communicative Approach grew out of sociolinguistics in the
1970s and the view that there is more to communication than just
grammar and vocabulary. Communication involves ‘communicative
competence’ – the ability to make yourself understood in socially
appropriate ways.
• Nowadays most teachers and students take the need for real
communication in class for granted, but English as a Foreign
Language (EFL) history clearly shows that this has not always been
the case! Within the Communicative Approach itself the precise
role of communication is debated. The so-called ‘weak’ form of the
approach sees communicative activities as opportunities for
students to practice new language and develop fluency. A weak
version of language teaching using this approach might simply
mean adding more opportunities to communicate to a traditional
grammar based curriculum.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND
CHARACTERISTICS OF TBL
*It`s based on the use of tasks.
*Students learn by interacting.
*It`s focused on the use of authentic language.
*Errors are part of a natural learning.
*The focus is on process rather than product.
APPROACH
• Theory of language
TBL is mainly motivated by a theory of learning.
However, there are several assumptions about the
nature of language:
• Language is primarily a means of making meaning
• Multiple models of language inform TBL
• Lexical units are central in language use and
learning.
• “Conversation” is the central focus of language
and the keystone of language acquisition.
Language is primarily a means of
making meaning
TBL emphasizes the central role of MEANING in
language use.
“Meaning is primary […] the assessment of a
task is in terms of OUTCOME. […] Task based
instruction in NOT concerned with language
display” (Skehan 1998:98)
Multiple models of language inform
TBL
• Advocates of TBL draw on STRUCTURAL,
FUNCTIONAL and INTERACTIONAL models of
language.
• Structural criteria is employed by Skehan , for
example, when determining the linguistic
complexity of tasks:
“Language is seen as less – to – more complex in
fairly traditional ways. […] Linguistic complexity
is interpretable as constrained by structural
syllabus considerations” (Skehan 1998: 99)
• A Functional classification of tasks is proposed
by Berwick. He distinguishes between Task
goals (educational goals with a clear didactic
function) and social goals (those which require
the use of language simply because the of the
activity in which the participants are engaged
in)
• Foster and Skehan (1996) propose a three-way
functional distinction of tasks:
• Personal
• Narrative
• Decision – making
• Finally, Pica (1994) distinguishes between
interactional activity and communicative
goals.
TBL draws on all three models of language
theory.
Lexical units are central in language
use and language learning
• Vocabulary has been considered to play a more
central role in second language learning and,
here, includes:
• Lexical phrases
• Sentence stems
• Prefabricated routines
• Collocations
Skehan incorporates this perspective:
“[…]Linguists and psycholinguistics have argued
that native language speech processing is very
frequently lexical in nature. […] Speech
processing is based on the production and
reception of whole phrase units larger
than the word […] which do not require any
internal processing. […]
Fluency concerns the
learner's capacity to produce
language in real time”
(Skehan 1996b: 21-22)
• Theory of Learning
TBL shares assumptions about the nature of
language learning underlying Communicative
Language Teaching, but some additional
principles play a central role:
• Tasks provide both the input and output
processing necessary for language acquisition
• Task activity and achievements are motivational
• Learning difficulty can be negotiated and fine-
tuned for particular pedagogical purposes
Tasks provide both the input and output
processing necessary for language acquisition
• Tasks, it is said, provide full opportunities for both
input and output requirements, which are
believed to be key processes in language learning
• Plough and Gass (1993) have included
“negotiation of meaning” as a necessary element
in acquisition.
• Tasks are believed to foster processes of
negotiation, modification, rephrasing and
experimentation that are at the heart of second
language learning.
• Tasks are considered to be the pivot point for
stimulation of input-output practice,
negotiation of meaning and transactionally
focused conversation.
Task activity and achievement are
motivational
Tasks are also said to improve learner motivation
and therefore promote learning, because they:
• Require the learner to use authentic language
• Have a well defined dimension and closure
• Are varied in format an operation
• Include physical activity
• Involve partnership and collaboration
• May call on the learner's past experience
• Tolerate and encourage a variety of
communication styles
Learning difficulty can be negotiated and fine-
tuned for particular pedagogical purposes
• Specific tasks can be designed to facilitate the
use and learning of particular aspects of
language
• Long and Crookes(1991) state that tasks
“provide a vehicle for the presentation of
appropriate target language samples […] and
for the delivery of comprehension and
production opportunities of negotiable
difficulty”
• Skehan (1998) suggests that in selecting or
designing tasks there is a trade off between
cognitive processing and focus on form: if the
task is too difficult, fluency may develop at the
expense of accuracy.
• Tasks can be used to “channel” learners toward
particular aspects of language.
DESING
• Objectives
Goals in TBL are ideally to be determined by the
specific needs of particular learners. The
selection of tasks, according to Long and Crookes
(1993), should be based on a careful analysis of
the real world needs of the learners.
• The syllabus
TBL is more concerned wit the process dimensions of
learning than with the specific content and skills that might
be acquired through the use of these processes.
A TBL syllabus specifies TASKS
Nunan (1989) suggest a syllabus with two types of tasks:
• Real world tasks: designed to practice or rehearse those
tasks that are found to be important and useful in the
real world (Example: booking a flight)
• Pedagogical tasks: they have a psycholinguistic basis in
SLA theory and research but do not necessarily reflect
real world tasks. (Example: information gap task)
The order of tasks has also to be determined. “Task
difficulty” has been proposed as a basis for the sequencing
of tasks, but the concept itself is difficult to determine.
Honeyfield (1993) offers these considerations:
1) Procedures (what learners have to do to derive output
from input)
2) Input text
3) Output required (including language, skills, discourse
knowledge and world knowledge)
4) Amount and type of help
5) Role of teachers and learners
6) Time
7) Motivation
8) Confidence
9) Learning styles
Types of Tasks
• According to…
 Breen: a language learnig task is a structured plan for the
provision of opportunities for the refinement of knowledge
and capabilities entailed in a new language and its use during
communication. Such a work plan will have its own particular
objective, appropriate content which is to be worked upon
and a working procedure…a simple and brief exercise is a task;
any language test can be included within the spectrum of
tasks.
 For Prabhu, a task is “an activity which requires
learners to arrive at an outcome from given
information thriugh some process of thought, and
which allows teachers to control and regulate that
process.
E.g.: reading train timetables and deciding which train
one should take to get to a certain destination on a
given day.
 Crookes defines a task as “a piece of work or an activity,
usually with a specified objective, undertaken as part of an
educational course, at work, or used to elicit data for
research.”
 Willis proposes six task types. She labels her task examples
as follows:
1. Listing
2. Ordering and sorting
3. Comparing
4. Problem solving
5. Sharing personal experiences
6. Creative tasks
 Pica, Kanagy and Falodun classify tasks according to the type
of interaction that occurs in task accomplishment and give the
following classification:
 Jigsaw tasks: these involve learners combining different pieces
of information to for a whole.
E.g.: Learners in three groups hear different versions of an
encounter with aliens. Together with other learners, they
complete comprehension questions based on all three
descriptions of the encounter.
 Information-gap tasks: one student or group of students has one set of
information and another student or group has a complementary set of
information.
E.g.: Learner A has a biography of a famous person with all the place names
missing, whilst Learner B has the same text with all the dates missing.
Together they can complete the text by asking each other questions.
 Problem-solving tasks.
 Decision-making tasks: students are given a problem for whichthere are a
number of possible outcomes and they must choose one throgu
negotiation and discussion.
 Opinion exchange tasks: learners engage in discussion and exchange of
ideas. They do not need to reach agreement.
Other characteristics of tasks:
1) One-way or two way: whether the task involves a one-way exchange of
information or a two-way exchange.
2) Convergent or divergent: whether the students achieve a common goal
or several different goals.
3) Collaborative or competitive.
4) Single or multiple outcomes.
5) Concrete or abstract language.
6) Simple or complex processing: whether the task requires simple or
complex cognitive processing.
7) Simple or complex language.
8) Reality-based or not reality-based: whether the task mirrors a real
world activity or is a pedagogical activity not found in the real world.
Learner Roles
Primary roles that are implied by task work are:
GROUP PARTICIPANT: many tasks will be done in pairs or in small groups.
MONITOR: in TBL, tasks are not employed for their own sake but as a means
of facilitating learning. Class activities have to designed so that students
have the opportunity to notice how language is used in communication.
RISK-TAKER AND INNOVATOR: many tasks will require learners to create and
interpret messages for which they lack full linguitic resources and prior
experience. The skills of guessing from linguistic and contextual clues,
asking for clarification and consulting with other learners may also need to
be developed.
Teacher Roles
SELECTOR AND SEQUENCER OF TASKS: a central role of the
teacher is in selecting, adapting and/or creating the tasks
themselves and then forming these into an instructional
sequence in keeping with learner neeeds, interests and
language skill level.
PREPARING LEARNERS FOR TASKS: activities might include topic
introduction, clarifying task instructions, helping students
learn or recall useful words and phrases to facilitate task
accomplishment and providing partial demonstration of task
procedures.
The Role of Instructional Materials
Materials that can be exploited for instruction in TBLT are limited only by the
imagination of the task designer.
 Realia: the use of authentic tasks supported by authentic maerials
wherever possible. The following are some of the task types that can be
built around such media products:
 Newspapers
E.g.: students prepare a job-wanted ad using examples form the classified
section.
 Television
E.g.: after watching an episode of an unknown soap opera, students list
characters and their possible relationship to other characters in the
episode.
 Internet
E.g.: students initiate a “chat” in a chat room, indicating a current interest in
their life and developing an answer to the first three people to respond.
PROCEDURE
Example of a TBL lesson plan
PRE-TASK
• What do you think is the strangest animal in the world?
Discuss in pais.
TASKS
• What do you think the platypus is like? Draw and write the
names of the parts of the body.
• Each compares their drawing with their friend’s.
• The teacher shows a picture of a platypus to the students.
They compare the picture to the one they have drawn.
• The teacher now displays another picture of this animal with
some new vocabulary included (adjective+part of the body).
Students should see this picture for half a minute and then
include to their drawings as many vocabulary as they can
remember. They compare their results in pais and hey report
results to the class.
• In pairs, students discuss what characteristics they think this
animal may have according to his body (habitat, alimentation,
reproductive cycle, etc).
• Students watch a fragment of a documentary and find out
information about the platypus. On a second watching, they
should complete a chart with the required information.
• Students report results to the class.
LANGUAGE FOCUS
• Students do some practice on the new
vocabulary and collocations learnt thoughout
the lesson. While correcting, the teacher goes
back to the topic and engages students in
conversation.

More Related Content

What's hot

Task based language teaching (formato 2010)
Task based language teaching (formato 2010)Task based language teaching (formato 2010)
Task based language teaching (formato 2010)
Patrmartin
 
Task based learning
Task based learningTask based learning
Task based learning
Sa345mar
 
Post methods era in Language Teaching
Post methods era in Language TeachingPost methods era in Language Teaching
Post methods era in Language Teaching
Samira Rahmdel
 
The audio lingual method
The audio lingual methodThe audio lingual method
The audio lingual method
omarswan
 
Language Teaching Approaches and Methods
Language Teaching Approaches and MethodsLanguage Teaching Approaches and Methods
Language Teaching Approaches and Methods
emma.a
 
Cooperative language learning
Cooperative language learningCooperative language learning
Cooperative language learning
Denlyn Joy Halili
 
Content based instruction
Content based instructionContent based instruction
Content based instruction
Emine Özkurt
 
Task based syllabus
Task based syllabusTask based syllabus
Task based syllabus
Uspan Sayuti
 

What's hot (20)

SKILL BASED SYLLABUS
SKILL BASED SYLLABUSSKILL BASED SYLLABUS
SKILL BASED SYLLABUS
 
Total physical response
Total physical responseTotal physical response
Total physical response
 
Task based language teaching (formato 2010)
Task based language teaching (formato 2010)Task based language teaching (formato 2010)
Task based language teaching (formato 2010)
 
Task based learning
Task based learningTask based learning
Task based learning
 
Post methods era in Language Teaching
Post methods era in Language TeachingPost methods era in Language Teaching
Post methods era in Language Teaching
 
The audio lingual method
The audio lingual methodThe audio lingual method
The audio lingual method
 
Competency Based Language Teaching (CBLT)
Competency Based Language Teaching (CBLT)Competency Based Language Teaching (CBLT)
Competency Based Language Teaching (CBLT)
 
Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT)
Task-Based  Language Teaching (TBLT)Task-Based  Language Teaching (TBLT)
Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT)
 
Language Teaching Approaches and Methods
Language Teaching Approaches and MethodsLanguage Teaching Approaches and Methods
Language Teaching Approaches and Methods
 
Task based language teaching
Task based language teachingTask based language teaching
Task based language teaching
 
Cooperative language learning
Cooperative language learningCooperative language learning
Cooperative language learning
 
Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT)
Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT)Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT)
Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT)
 
Content based instruction
Content based instructionContent based instruction
Content based instruction
 
Silent way
Silent waySilent way
Silent way
 
Testing reading
Testing readingTesting reading
Testing reading
 
Task based syllabus
Task based syllabusTask based syllabus
Task based syllabus
 
Task based syllabus
Task based syllabusTask based syllabus
Task based syllabus
 
Needs Analysis
Needs AnalysisNeeds Analysis
Needs Analysis
 
The lexical approach.ppt
The lexical approach.pptThe lexical approach.ppt
The lexical approach.ppt
 
Grammar Translation Method
Grammar Translation MethodGrammar Translation Method
Grammar Translation Method
 

Similar to TBL (Task based learning)

Task based-language-teachingkom-121024110933-phpapp01
Task based-language-teachingkom-121024110933-phpapp01Task based-language-teachingkom-121024110933-phpapp01
Task based-language-teachingkom-121024110933-phpapp01
Àbdélhàdi ElhOùs
 
Pta february 2007_tr
Pta february 2007_trPta february 2007_tr
Pta february 2007_tr
Katrin Saks
 
Exploring the Effectiveness of Task Based Language Teaching In the Improveme...
 Exploring the Effectiveness of Task Based Language Teaching In the Improveme... Exploring the Effectiveness of Task Based Language Teaching In the Improveme...
Exploring the Effectiveness of Task Based Language Teaching In the Improveme...
Research Journal of Education
 
Task based instruction
Task based instructionTask based instruction
Task based instruction
Tuğçe Aslan
 
Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8
Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8
Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8
Karen Hope
 
Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8
Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8
Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8
Karen Hope
 
Taskification at lower level
Taskification at lower levelTaskification at lower level
Taskification at lower level
M B
 

Similar to TBL (Task based learning) (20)

Task based language teaching @mehdi sufi
Task based language teaching @mehdi sufiTask based language teaching @mehdi sufi
Task based language teaching @mehdi sufi
 
Tbl
TblTbl
Tbl
 
task based language teaching theory .pptx
task based language teaching theory .pptxtask based language teaching theory .pptx
task based language teaching theory .pptx
 
Task based-language-teachingkom-121024110933-phpapp01
Task based-language-teachingkom-121024110933-phpapp01Task based-language-teachingkom-121024110933-phpapp01
Task based-language-teachingkom-121024110933-phpapp01
 
Task based-language-teaching k om
Task based-language-teaching k omTask based-language-teaching k om
Task based-language-teaching k om
 
Current Approaches.pptxgggggggggggggggggggggggggg
Current Approaches.pptxggggggggggggggggggggggggggCurrent Approaches.pptxgggggggggggggggggggggggggg
Current Approaches.pptxgggggggggggggggggggggggggg
 
British council resources ii
British council resources iiBritish council resources ii
British council resources ii
 
Task based
Task basedTask based
Task based
 
Communicative approach
Communicative approachCommunicative approach
Communicative approach
 
Task-based L2 pedagogy from the teacher’s point of view
Task-based L2 pedagogy from the teacher’s point of viewTask-based L2 pedagogy from the teacher’s point of view
Task-based L2 pedagogy from the teacher’s point of view
 
Curriculum and Syllabus
Curriculum and Syllabus Curriculum and Syllabus
Curriculum and Syllabus
 
Pta february 2007_tr
Pta february 2007_trPta february 2007_tr
Pta february 2007_tr
 
The Framework of Materials and Methods.pptx
The Framework of Materials and Methods.pptxThe Framework of Materials and Methods.pptx
The Framework of Materials and Methods.pptx
 
Exploring the Effectiveness of Task Based Language Teaching In the Improveme...
 Exploring the Effectiveness of Task Based Language Teaching In the Improveme... Exploring the Effectiveness of Task Based Language Teaching In the Improveme...
Exploring the Effectiveness of Task Based Language Teaching In the Improveme...
 
Task based instruction
Task based instructionTask based instruction
Task based instruction
 
Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8
Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8
Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8
 
Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8
Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8
Syllabus designing-1225482229015374-8
 
Taskification at lower level
Taskification at lower levelTaskification at lower level
Taskification at lower level
 
Syllabus Designing
Syllabus DesigningSyllabus Designing
Syllabus Designing
 
syllabus design for M.Ed, M.Phil Linguistics and Curriculum Designers
syllabus design  for M.Ed, M.Phil Linguistics and Curriculum Designerssyllabus design  for M.Ed, M.Phil Linguistics and Curriculum Designers
syllabus design for M.Ed, M.Phil Linguistics and Curriculum Designers
 

More from tortadericota (11)

Solidarity and politeness
Solidarity and politenessSolidarity and politeness
Solidarity and politeness
 
Folktales
FolktalesFolktales
Folktales
 
Ict essay
Ict essayIct essay
Ict essay
 
Blog - 2.0 Learning!
Blog - 2.0 Learning!Blog - 2.0 Learning!
Blog - 2.0 Learning!
 
Evaluation webquest
Evaluation webquestEvaluation webquest
Evaluation webquest
 
Lesson plan tp 3
Lesson plan tp 3Lesson plan tp 3
Lesson plan tp 3
 
Ict assignment 2
Ict assignment 2Ict assignment 2
Ict assignment 2
 
Ict assignment 2
Ict assignment 2Ict assignment 2
Ict assignment 2
 
Form
FormForm
Form
 
History of educational technology (ppp)
History of educational technology (ppp)History of educational technology (ppp)
History of educational technology (ppp)
 
Presentations tips
Presentations tipsPresentations tips
Presentations tips
 

Recently uploaded

The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptxThird Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
 
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptxDyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
Kodo Millet PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
Kodo Millet  PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...Kodo Millet  PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
Kodo Millet PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
 
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docxPython Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding  Accommodations and ModificationsUnderstanding  Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POSHow to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
 
Magic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptx
Magic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptxMagic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptx
Magic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptx
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 

TBL (Task based learning)

  • 2. What is Task Based Learning • Task-based language learning (TBLL), also known as task-based language teaching (TBLT) or task-based instruction (TBI) focuses on the use of authentic language and on asking students to do meaningful tasks using the target language. Such tasks can include visiting a doctor, conducting an interview, or calling customer service for help. Assessment is primarily based on task outcome (in other words the appropriate completion of tasks) rather than on accuracy of language forms. This makes TBLL especially popular for developing target language fluency and student confidence.
  • 3. Definition of a Task • According to Rod Ellis (2007), a task has four main characteristics: • A task involves a primary focus on (pragmatic) meaning. • A task has some kind of ‘gap’. • The participants choose the linguistic resources needed to complete the task. • A task has a clearly defined outcome.
  • 4. Historical Background • Task-Based Learning, one of the most talked- about recent methods, can be traced back to the ‘strong’ Communicative Approach, where teaching is done entirely through communicative tasks. There is no set grammar syllabus. Focusing on language use after a task has been completed is widely accepted as an aid to acquisition, and task repetition gives students the chance to practice new language.
  • 5. The Communicative Approach • The Communicative Approach grew out of sociolinguistics in the 1970s and the view that there is more to communication than just grammar and vocabulary. Communication involves ‘communicative competence’ – the ability to make yourself understood in socially appropriate ways. • Nowadays most teachers and students take the need for real communication in class for granted, but English as a Foreign Language (EFL) history clearly shows that this has not always been the case! Within the Communicative Approach itself the precise role of communication is debated. The so-called ‘weak’ form of the approach sees communicative activities as opportunities for students to practice new language and develop fluency. A weak version of language teaching using this approach might simply mean adding more opportunities to communicate to a traditional grammar based curriculum.
  • 6. GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF TBL *It`s based on the use of tasks. *Students learn by interacting. *It`s focused on the use of authentic language. *Errors are part of a natural learning. *The focus is on process rather than product.
  • 7. APPROACH • Theory of language TBL is mainly motivated by a theory of learning. However, there are several assumptions about the nature of language: • Language is primarily a means of making meaning • Multiple models of language inform TBL • Lexical units are central in language use and learning. • “Conversation” is the central focus of language and the keystone of language acquisition.
  • 8. Language is primarily a means of making meaning TBL emphasizes the central role of MEANING in language use. “Meaning is primary […] the assessment of a task is in terms of OUTCOME. […] Task based instruction in NOT concerned with language display” (Skehan 1998:98)
  • 9. Multiple models of language inform TBL • Advocates of TBL draw on STRUCTURAL, FUNCTIONAL and INTERACTIONAL models of language. • Structural criteria is employed by Skehan , for example, when determining the linguistic complexity of tasks: “Language is seen as less – to – more complex in fairly traditional ways. […] Linguistic complexity is interpretable as constrained by structural syllabus considerations” (Skehan 1998: 99)
  • 10. • A Functional classification of tasks is proposed by Berwick. He distinguishes between Task goals (educational goals with a clear didactic function) and social goals (those which require the use of language simply because the of the activity in which the participants are engaged in) • Foster and Skehan (1996) propose a three-way functional distinction of tasks: • Personal • Narrative • Decision – making
  • 11. • Finally, Pica (1994) distinguishes between interactional activity and communicative goals. TBL draws on all three models of language theory.
  • 12. Lexical units are central in language use and language learning • Vocabulary has been considered to play a more central role in second language learning and, here, includes: • Lexical phrases • Sentence stems • Prefabricated routines • Collocations
  • 13. Skehan incorporates this perspective: “[…]Linguists and psycholinguistics have argued that native language speech processing is very frequently lexical in nature. […] Speech processing is based on the production and reception of whole phrase units larger than the word […] which do not require any internal processing. […] Fluency concerns the learner's capacity to produce language in real time” (Skehan 1996b: 21-22)
  • 14. • Theory of Learning TBL shares assumptions about the nature of language learning underlying Communicative Language Teaching, but some additional principles play a central role: • Tasks provide both the input and output processing necessary for language acquisition • Task activity and achievements are motivational • Learning difficulty can be negotiated and fine- tuned for particular pedagogical purposes
  • 15. Tasks provide both the input and output processing necessary for language acquisition • Tasks, it is said, provide full opportunities for both input and output requirements, which are believed to be key processes in language learning • Plough and Gass (1993) have included “negotiation of meaning” as a necessary element in acquisition. • Tasks are believed to foster processes of negotiation, modification, rephrasing and experimentation that are at the heart of second language learning.
  • 16. • Tasks are considered to be the pivot point for stimulation of input-output practice, negotiation of meaning and transactionally focused conversation.
  • 17. Task activity and achievement are motivational Tasks are also said to improve learner motivation and therefore promote learning, because they: • Require the learner to use authentic language • Have a well defined dimension and closure • Are varied in format an operation • Include physical activity • Involve partnership and collaboration • May call on the learner's past experience • Tolerate and encourage a variety of communication styles
  • 18. Learning difficulty can be negotiated and fine- tuned for particular pedagogical purposes • Specific tasks can be designed to facilitate the use and learning of particular aspects of language • Long and Crookes(1991) state that tasks “provide a vehicle for the presentation of appropriate target language samples […] and for the delivery of comprehension and production opportunities of negotiable difficulty”
  • 19. • Skehan (1998) suggests that in selecting or designing tasks there is a trade off between cognitive processing and focus on form: if the task is too difficult, fluency may develop at the expense of accuracy. • Tasks can be used to “channel” learners toward particular aspects of language.
  • 20. DESING • Objectives Goals in TBL are ideally to be determined by the specific needs of particular learners. The selection of tasks, according to Long and Crookes (1993), should be based on a careful analysis of the real world needs of the learners.
  • 21. • The syllabus TBL is more concerned wit the process dimensions of learning than with the specific content and skills that might be acquired through the use of these processes. A TBL syllabus specifies TASKS Nunan (1989) suggest a syllabus with two types of tasks: • Real world tasks: designed to practice or rehearse those tasks that are found to be important and useful in the real world (Example: booking a flight) • Pedagogical tasks: they have a psycholinguistic basis in SLA theory and research but do not necessarily reflect real world tasks. (Example: information gap task)
  • 22. The order of tasks has also to be determined. “Task difficulty” has been proposed as a basis for the sequencing of tasks, but the concept itself is difficult to determine. Honeyfield (1993) offers these considerations: 1) Procedures (what learners have to do to derive output from input) 2) Input text 3) Output required (including language, skills, discourse knowledge and world knowledge) 4) Amount and type of help 5) Role of teachers and learners 6) Time 7) Motivation 8) Confidence 9) Learning styles
  • 23. Types of Tasks • According to…  Breen: a language learnig task is a structured plan for the provision of opportunities for the refinement of knowledge and capabilities entailed in a new language and its use during communication. Such a work plan will have its own particular objective, appropriate content which is to be worked upon and a working procedure…a simple and brief exercise is a task; any language test can be included within the spectrum of tasks.
  • 24.  For Prabhu, a task is “an activity which requires learners to arrive at an outcome from given information thriugh some process of thought, and which allows teachers to control and regulate that process. E.g.: reading train timetables and deciding which train one should take to get to a certain destination on a given day.
  • 25.  Crookes defines a task as “a piece of work or an activity, usually with a specified objective, undertaken as part of an educational course, at work, or used to elicit data for research.”  Willis proposes six task types. She labels her task examples as follows: 1. Listing 2. Ordering and sorting 3. Comparing 4. Problem solving 5. Sharing personal experiences 6. Creative tasks
  • 26.  Pica, Kanagy and Falodun classify tasks according to the type of interaction that occurs in task accomplishment and give the following classification:  Jigsaw tasks: these involve learners combining different pieces of information to for a whole. E.g.: Learners in three groups hear different versions of an encounter with aliens. Together with other learners, they complete comprehension questions based on all three descriptions of the encounter.
  • 27.  Information-gap tasks: one student or group of students has one set of information and another student or group has a complementary set of information. E.g.: Learner A has a biography of a famous person with all the place names missing, whilst Learner B has the same text with all the dates missing. Together they can complete the text by asking each other questions.  Problem-solving tasks.  Decision-making tasks: students are given a problem for whichthere are a number of possible outcomes and they must choose one throgu negotiation and discussion.  Opinion exchange tasks: learners engage in discussion and exchange of ideas. They do not need to reach agreement.
  • 28. Other characteristics of tasks: 1) One-way or two way: whether the task involves a one-way exchange of information or a two-way exchange. 2) Convergent or divergent: whether the students achieve a common goal or several different goals. 3) Collaborative or competitive. 4) Single or multiple outcomes. 5) Concrete or abstract language. 6) Simple or complex processing: whether the task requires simple or complex cognitive processing. 7) Simple or complex language. 8) Reality-based or not reality-based: whether the task mirrors a real world activity or is a pedagogical activity not found in the real world.
  • 29. Learner Roles Primary roles that are implied by task work are: GROUP PARTICIPANT: many tasks will be done in pairs or in small groups. MONITOR: in TBL, tasks are not employed for their own sake but as a means of facilitating learning. Class activities have to designed so that students have the opportunity to notice how language is used in communication. RISK-TAKER AND INNOVATOR: many tasks will require learners to create and interpret messages for which they lack full linguitic resources and prior experience. The skills of guessing from linguistic and contextual clues, asking for clarification and consulting with other learners may also need to be developed.
  • 30. Teacher Roles SELECTOR AND SEQUENCER OF TASKS: a central role of the teacher is in selecting, adapting and/or creating the tasks themselves and then forming these into an instructional sequence in keeping with learner neeeds, interests and language skill level. PREPARING LEARNERS FOR TASKS: activities might include topic introduction, clarifying task instructions, helping students learn or recall useful words and phrases to facilitate task accomplishment and providing partial demonstration of task procedures.
  • 31. The Role of Instructional Materials Materials that can be exploited for instruction in TBLT are limited only by the imagination of the task designer.  Realia: the use of authentic tasks supported by authentic maerials wherever possible. The following are some of the task types that can be built around such media products:  Newspapers E.g.: students prepare a job-wanted ad using examples form the classified section.  Television E.g.: after watching an episode of an unknown soap opera, students list characters and their possible relationship to other characters in the episode.  Internet E.g.: students initiate a “chat” in a chat room, indicating a current interest in their life and developing an answer to the first three people to respond.
  • 33.
  • 34. Example of a TBL lesson plan PRE-TASK • What do you think is the strangest animal in the world? Discuss in pais. TASKS • What do you think the platypus is like? Draw and write the names of the parts of the body. • Each compares their drawing with their friend’s. • The teacher shows a picture of a platypus to the students. They compare the picture to the one they have drawn.
  • 35.
  • 36. • The teacher now displays another picture of this animal with some new vocabulary included (adjective+part of the body). Students should see this picture for half a minute and then include to their drawings as many vocabulary as they can remember. They compare their results in pais and hey report results to the class. • In pairs, students discuss what characteristics they think this animal may have according to his body (habitat, alimentation, reproductive cycle, etc). • Students watch a fragment of a documentary and find out information about the platypus. On a second watching, they should complete a chart with the required information. • Students report results to the class.
  • 37.
  • 38. LANGUAGE FOCUS • Students do some practice on the new vocabulary and collocations learnt thoughout the lesson. While correcting, the teacher goes back to the topic and engages students in conversation.