SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 18
Baixar para ler offline
Marriage:
Washington, D.C.’s No. 1
   Weapon Against
  Childhood Poverty
How the Collapse of Marriage Hurts Children
  and Three Steps to Reverse the Damage
            A Heritage Foundation Book of Charts • 2012

    Richard and Helen DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society
Growth of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing in Washington, D.C., 1929–2010
   Throughout most of the history          PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK
of the District of Columbia, out-
of-wedlock childbearing was                80%
relatively uncommon.
  When the federal government’s            70%
War on Poverty began in 1964,
around one in four children in             60%
Washington, D.C. were born out                                                                             54.8%
of wedlock. However, over the
next four decades, the number              50%
rose rapidly. By 2010, 54.8 percent
of births in Washington, D.C.              40%
occurred outside of marriage.
                                           30%
Note: Initiated by President Lyndon
Johnson in 1964, the War on Poverty        20%
led to the creation of more than three
dozen welfare programs to aid poor
persons. Government has spent $16.7        10%
trillion on means-tested aid to the poor
since 1964.
                                            0%
Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census
Bureau, and National Center for Health        1930   1940   1950   1960   1970   1980   1990    2000   2010
Statistics.

                                                      Chart 1 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.      heritage.org
Death of Marriage in Washington, D.C., 1929–2010
  The marital birth rate — the            PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN TO MARRIED COUPLES
percentage of all births that occur
                                          100%
to married parents — is the flip
side of the out-of-wedlock birth
rate.                                     90%
  Through most of the 20th cen-
tury, marital births were the norm        80%
in Washington, D.C. In 1964, over
74 percent of births occurred to
                                          70%
married couples.
  However, in the mid-1960s, the
                                          60%
marital birth rate began to fall
steadily. By 2010, only 45.2 per-
cent of births in Washington, D.C.        50%
occurred to married couples.                                                                              45.2%
                                          40%

Note: In any given year, the sum of the
out-of-wedlock birth rate (Chart 1)       30%
and the marital birth rate (Chart 2)
equals 100 percent of all births.
                                          20%
Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census
Bureau, and National Center for Health       1930   1940   1950   1960   1970   1980   1990    2000   2010
Statistics.

                                                     Chart 2 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.      heritage.org
In Washington, D.C., Marriage Drops the Probability of Child Poverty
by 90 Percent
   The rapid rise in out-of-           PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN THAT ARE POOR
wedlock childbearing is a major         40%
cause of high levels of child pov-                    36.0%
erty in Washington, D.C.
                                        35%
  Some 36 percent of single moth-
ers with children are poor com-         30%
pared to 3.5 percent of married
couples with children.
                                        25%
   Single-parent families with
children are more than ten times
                                        20%
more likely to be poor than fami-
lies in which the parents are mar-
ried.                                   15%

  The higher poverty rate among
                                        10%
single-mother families is due both
to the lower education levels of
                                         5%                                            3.5%
the mothers and the lower income
due to the absence of the father.
                                         0%
                                                  Single-Parent,               Married,Two-Parent
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American             Female-Headed                       Families
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.                    Families

                                                Chart 3 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.   heritage.org
In Washington, D.C., Six in Ten Families with Children Are Not Married

  Overall, married couples head
less than 40 percent of families
with children in Washington, D.C.
Over 60 percent are single-parent
families.


                                                                         Married
                                                                         Families
                                               Unmarried                  38.3%
                                                Families
                                                 61.7%




Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

                                       Chart 4 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.   heritage.org
In Washington, D.C., 94 Percent of Poor Families with Children
Are Not Married
   Among poor families with                                     Married
children in Washington, D.C., 94                                Families
percent are not married. By
                                                                  6.1%
contrast, only six percent of poor
families with children are headed
by married couples.




                                                Unmarried
                                                 Families
                                                  93.9%




Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

                                       Chart 5 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.   heritage.org
In Washington, D.C., Few Unwed Births Occur to Teenagers
  Out-of-wedlock births are often       PERCENTAGE OF OUT-OF-WEDLOCK BIRTHS
confused erroneously with teen          BY AGE OF MOTHER
births, but only 7.9 percent of
out-of-wedlock births in Washing-                                           Under
ton, D.C. occur to girls under age                                          Age 18:
18.                                                                          7.9%
  By contrast, some 70 percent of
out-of-wedlock births occur to                              Age
young adult women between the                              30–54:                      Age
ages of 18 and 29.                                         22.2%                      18–19:
                                                                                      12.9%




                                                          Age                    Age
                                                         25–29:                 20–24:
                                                         25.1%                  31.9%

Note: Figures have been rounded.

Source: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS
data.

                                                 Chart 6 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.   heritage.org
Less-Educated Women Are More Likely to Give Birth Outside
of Marriage
   Unwed childbearing occurs most               PERCENTAGE OF BIRTHS THAT ARE MARITAL
frequently among the women who                  OR OUT OF WEDLOCK
will have the greatest difficulty sup-           100%
porting children by themselves: those                                                               8.1%         Unmarried
with low levels of education.                    90%
                                                                                                                 Mothers
   In the U.S., among women who                                                      42.0%
                                                 80%
are high school dropouts, about 65.2
percent of all births occur outside
                                                                       54.5%
                                                 70%
marriage. Among women who have                           65.2%
only a high school diploma, well over            60%
                                                                                                    91.9%        Married
half of all births occur outside mar-                                                                            Mothers
riage. By contrast, among women                  50%
with at least a college degree, only
                                                 40%
8.1 percent of births are out of wed-                                                58.0%
lock.                                            30%
                                                                       45.5%
Note: Specific data on out-of-wedlock            20%
births and maternal education are not
                                                         34.8%
available in Washington, D.C. However, the       10%
pattern varies little between states. Wash-
ington, D.C. data will be very similar to the     0%
national data presented in this chart.                 High School High School       Some         College        Mother’s
                                                        Dropout     Graduate        College       Graduate       education
Source: U.S. Department of Health and                     (0–11        (12          (13–15          (16+         level
Human Services, Centers for Disease                       Years)      Years)         Years)        Years)
Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data.

                                                            Chart 7 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.    heritage.org
Both Marriage and Education Are Highly Effective in Reducing
Child Poverty in Washington, D.C.
  The poverty rate of married          PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES                  Poverty Rate of Families by
couples with children is dramati-      WITH CHILDREN THAT                                                          Single
                                                                              Education and Marital Status
cally lower than the rate for house-   ARE POOR                                                                    Married
                                                                               of the Head of Household
holds headed by single parents.
                                         70%
This is true even when the married
couple is compared to single par-               59.5%
                                         60%
ents with the same education level.
  For example, in Washington,            50%
D.C., the poverty rate for a single                                42.5%
mother who has only a high               40%
school diploma is 42.5 percent,
                                                                                      31.3%
but the poverty rate for a married       30%
couple family headed by an indi-
vidual who, similarly, has only a        20%
high school degree is far lower at                      14.6%
                                                                           11.2%                         9.2%
11.2 percent.                            10%                                                  7.2%
  On average, marriage drops the                                                                                 1.2%
poverty rate by about 78 percent          0%
among families with the same                    High School        High School           Some             College
education level.                                 Dropout            Graduate            College           Graduate

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American   Note: Virtually none of the heads of families in the chart who are high school
Community Survey, 2005–2009 data.      dropouts are minor teenagers.

                                                      Chart 8 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.         heritage.org
Unwed Birth Rates Vary Strongly by Race in Washington, D.C.
  Out-of-wedlock childbearing           PERCENT OF BIRTHS THAT ARE OUT OF WEDLOCK
varies considerably by race.
  In 2008, 57.8 percent of births       100%
in Washington D.C. occurred                                                                 8.3%
                                        90%
outside marriage. The rate was
lowest among non-Hispanic               80%
                                                                                                    79.1%
whites. Within that group about                                                   72.6%
one in 15 births (7 percent) were       70%
non-marital.
                                        60%     57.8%
  Among Hispanics, nearly three
in four births were out of wedlock.
                                        50%
Among blacks, nearly eight in ten
births were to unmarried women          40%
(79.1 percent).
                                        30%

                                        20%

                                        10%                       7.0%

Source: U.S. Department of Health and    0%
Human Services, Centers for Disease            All Races         White           Hispanic           Black
Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS                                 Non-                               Non-
data.                                                           Hispanic                           Hispanic

                                                   Chart 9 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.   heritage.org
Growth of Unwed Childbearing Among Blacks in Washington, D.C.,
1929–2008
                                            PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK
   Between 1929 and 1950, around
one in five black children in the            100%
District of Columbia were born
outside marriage. During the                90%
                                                                                                                Black
1950s and early 1960s the rate rose                                                                             (Includes
slowly.                                     80%                                                                 Black
                                                                                                                Hispanics)
   Following the onset of the War
on Poverty in 1964, the rate                70%
                                                                                                                Black
increased dramatically. Ten years                                                                               Non-
later, in 1974, well over half the          60%                                                                 Hispanics
black births in the District were
non-marital.                                50%
   By 1994, eight out of ten black
births in D.C. occurred outside             40%
marriage. The rate has remained at
or near that level up to the present.       30%

Note: Beginning in 1996, the govern-        20%
ment began counting black Hispanic
births separately. This made little
                                            10%
difference in the black non-marital birth
rate in D.C.
                                             0%
Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census
Bureau, and National Center for Health         1930   1940   1950   1960    1970   1980    1990   2000 2008
Statistics.

                                                       Chart 10 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.    heritage.org
Growth of Unwed Childbearing Among Whites and Hispanics
in Washington, D.C., 1929–2008
   Between 1929 and 1963, the unwed          PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK
birth rate among whites (both Hispanic
and non-Hispanic) in Washington, D.C.        100%
was generally less than 5 percent. In the
mid-1960s the rate increased quickly,        90%
reaching 20 percent in 1968.
   Beginning in 1996, the government
                                             80%
began counting white Hispanic and
white non-Hispanic births separately.                                                                         Hispanic
   Since then, the Hispanic unwed birth      70%
rate has risen rapidly. In 1996, 55.3
percent of Hispanic births in the District   60%
were non-marital. In 2008, the figure
was 72.6 percent.
   By contrast, the unwed birth rate         50%
among white non-Hispanic women has
actually fallen, from 12 percent of births   40%                                            White
in 1996 to 7 percent in 2008. The                                                           (Includes
decline in unwed births among white          30%                                            Hispanics)
non-Hispanic is unusual and reflects the
high socioeconomic status of most
white non-Hispanics living in D.C.           20%
During the same period, in the rest of
the nation, the unwed birth rate of white    10%
non-Hispanics has risen significantly.                                                                         White
                                                                                                              Non-Hispanics
                                              0%
Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census
Bureau, and National Center for Health          1930   1940   1950   1960    1970   1980   1990     2000 2008
Statistics.

                                                        Chart 11 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.     heritage.org
Racial Composition of All Births and Out-of-Wedlock Births
in Washington, D.C.
                                                  ALL BIRTHS                           OUT-OF-WEDLOCK BIRTHS
   In Washington, D.C. in 2008,
some 54.9 percent of all births
occurred to non-Hispanic blacks,
25.9 percent occurred to non-
Hispanic whites, and 16.5 percent
occurred to Hispanics.
  Because blacks and Hispanics
are more likely to have children                       54.9%               Black Non-             75.1%
without being married, they                                                  Hispanic
account for nearly all out-of-
wedlock births in Washington,
D.C.
  In Washington, D.C. in 2008,
75.1 percent of all non-marital
births were to non-Hispanic black                      25.9%
women, 20.7 percent were to
Hispanic women, and only 3.1                                               White Non-                        3.1%
percent were to white non-                                                  Hispanic
Hispanic women.                                                                                   20.7%
                                                       16.5%                Hispanic
Source: U.S. Department of Health and      2.7%                            Asian/Other                       1.1%
Human Services, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS
data.                                   Note: Figures have been rounded.

                                                     Chart 12 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.   heritage.org
Non-Married Black Families Are Six Times More Likely to Be Poor
in Washington, D.C.
  Marriage leads to lower poverty      PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR
rates for blacks, whites, and His-
panics.
                                        35%
  In 2009, the poverty rate for
married black couples in Washing-                                                     29.8%
ton, D.C. was 5.3 percent, while        30%
the poverty rate for non-married
black families was about six times      25%
higher at 29.8 percent.
                                        20%


                                        15%


                                        10%

                                                      5.3%
                                         5%


                                         0%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American            Married Families              Non-Married Families
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.


                                               Chart 13 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.   heritage.org
Non-Married White Families Are 13 Times More Likely to Be Poor
in Washington, D.C.
  In 2009, the poverty rate for        PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR
married white families in Wash-
ington, D.C. was 0.7 percent. But       10%
the poverty rate for non-married
white families was nearly 13 times       9%
                                                                                       8.8%
higher at 8.8 percent.
                                         8%

                                         7%

                                         6%

                                         5%

                                         4%

                                         3%

                                         2%

                                         1%           0.7%

                                         0%
                                                Married Families              Non-Married Families
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

                                               Chart 14 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.   heritage.org
Non-Married Hispanic Families Are Twice as Likely to Be Poor in
Washington, D.C.
   In 2009, the poverty rate for       PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR
Hispanic married families in
Washington, D.C. was 9.3 percent,
                                        25%
while the poverty rate among
non-married families was over two
times higher at 19.3 percent.
                                        20%                                           19.3%



                                        15%



                                        10%           9.3%



                                         5%



                                         0%
                                                Married Families              Non-Married Families
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

                                               Chart 15 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C.   heritage.org
Three Steps to Reduce Child Poverty through Marriage

1) Provide information on the benefits of marriage in reducing child poverty
   and improving child well-being.

    Marriage is a highly effective institution which greatly decreases parental and child
  poverty while improving long-term outcomes for children. Conversely, the absence of
  marriage greatly increases welfare costs and imposes added burdens on taxpayers.
    Unfortunately, almost no information on these topics is available in low-income
  communities. This information deficit should be corrected in the following manner:

     • Explain the benefits of marriage in middle and high schools with a high
       proportion of at-risk youth;
     • Create public education campaigns in low-income communities on the
       benefits of marriage; and,
     • Require federally funded birth control clinics to provide information on the
       benefits of marriage and the skills needed to develop stable families to
       interested low-income clients.

2) Reduce anti-marriage penalties in means-tested welfare programs.

3) Promote life-goal-planning, marriage-strengthening, and divorce-reduction
   programs to increase healthy marriages and reduce divorce and separation.
The Family & Religion Initiative is one of 10 Transformational Initiatives making up The Heritage
Foundation’s Leadership for America campaign. For more products and information related to this initiative
or to learn more about the Leadership for America campaign, please visit heritage.org.




  The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to
formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited gov-
ernment, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.
  Our vision is to build an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish. As
conservatives, we believe the values and ideas that motivated our Founding Fathers are worth conserving.
As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and values.




                                     214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE • Washington, D.C. 20002 • (202) 546-4400 • heritage.org

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Marriage and Poverty in the United States
Marriage and Poverty in the United StatesMarriage and Poverty in the United States
Marriage and Poverty in the United StatesThe Heritage Foundation
 

Mais procurados (20)

Marriage Poverty - Indiana
Marriage Poverty - IndianaMarriage Poverty - Indiana
Marriage Poverty - Indiana
 
Marriage Poverty - Delaware
Marriage Poverty - DelawareMarriage Poverty - Delaware
Marriage Poverty - Delaware
 
Marriage & Poverty: Virginia
Marriage & Poverty: VirginiaMarriage & Poverty: Virginia
Marriage & Poverty: Virginia
 
Marriage Poverty - Virginia
Marriage Poverty - VirginiaMarriage Poverty - Virginia
Marriage Poverty - Virginia
 
Marriage & Poverty: Delaware
Marriage & Poverty: DelawareMarriage & Poverty: Delaware
Marriage & Poverty: Delaware
 
Marriage & Poverty: Texas
Marriage & Poverty: TexasMarriage & Poverty: Texas
Marriage & Poverty: Texas
 
Marriage & Poverty: Hawaii
Marriage & Poverty: HawaiiMarriage & Poverty: Hawaii
Marriage & Poverty: Hawaii
 
Marriage Poverty - New Mexico
Marriage Poverty - New MexicoMarriage Poverty - New Mexico
Marriage Poverty - New Mexico
 
Marriage & Poverty: Utah
Marriage & Poverty: UtahMarriage & Poverty: Utah
Marriage & Poverty: Utah
 
Marriage Poverty - California
Marriage Poverty - CaliforniaMarriage Poverty - California
Marriage Poverty - California
 
Marriage & Poverty: West Virginia
Marriage & Poverty: West VirginiaMarriage & Poverty: West Virginia
Marriage & Poverty: West Virginia
 
Marriage & Poverty: Iowa
Marriage & Poverty: IowaMarriage & Poverty: Iowa
Marriage & Poverty: Iowa
 
Marriage & Poverty: Florida
Marriage & Poverty: FloridaMarriage & Poverty: Florida
Marriage & Poverty: Florida
 
Marriage Poverty - Alabama
Marriage Poverty - AlabamaMarriage Poverty - Alabama
Marriage Poverty - Alabama
 
Marriage and Poverty in the United States
Marriage and Poverty in the United StatesMarriage and Poverty in the United States
Marriage and Poverty in the United States
 
Marriage & Poverty: Vermont
Marriage & Poverty: VermontMarriage & Poverty: Vermont
Marriage & Poverty: Vermont
 
Marriage & Poverty: Wyoming
Marriage & Poverty: WyomingMarriage & Poverty: Wyoming
Marriage & Poverty: Wyoming
 
Marriage & Poverty: Tennessee
Marriage & Poverty: TennesseeMarriage & Poverty: Tennessee
Marriage & Poverty: Tennessee
 
Marriage Poverty - Mississippi
Marriage Poverty - MississippiMarriage Poverty - Mississippi
Marriage Poverty - Mississippi
 
Marriage & Poverty: Kentucky
Marriage & Poverty: KentuckyMarriage & Poverty: Kentucky
Marriage & Poverty: Kentucky
 

Destaque

Destaque (6)

Marriage & Poverty: Rhode Island
Marriage & Poverty: Rhode IslandMarriage & Poverty: Rhode Island
Marriage & Poverty: Rhode Island
 
Marriage & Poverty: Michigan
Marriage & Poverty: MichiganMarriage & Poverty: Michigan
Marriage & Poverty: Michigan
 
Defending Defense: Setting the Record Straight on U.S. Military Spending Requ...
Defending Defense: Setting the Record Straight on U.S. Military Spending Requ...Defending Defense: Setting the Record Straight on U.S. Military Spending Requ...
Defending Defense: Setting the Record Straight on U.S. Military Spending Requ...
 
Marriage Poverty - New York
Marriage Poverty - New YorkMarriage Poverty - New York
Marriage Poverty - New York
 
Marriage & Poverty: New Mexico
Marriage & Poverty: New MexicoMarriage & Poverty: New Mexico
Marriage & Poverty: New Mexico
 
Marriage & Poverty: Nevada
Marriage & Poverty: NevadaMarriage & Poverty: Nevada
Marriage & Poverty: Nevada
 

Semelhante a Marriage Greatly Reduces Child Poverty in D.C

Semelhante a Marriage Greatly Reduces Child Poverty in D.C (20)

Marriage & Poverty: Kansas
Marriage & Poverty: KansasMarriage & Poverty: Kansas
Marriage & Poverty: Kansas
 
Marriage & Poverty: Connecticut
Marriage & Poverty: ConnecticutMarriage & Poverty: Connecticut
Marriage & Poverty: Connecticut
 
Marriage and Poverty - West Virginia
Marriage and Poverty - West VirginiaMarriage and Poverty - West Virginia
Marriage and Poverty - West Virginia
 
Marriage Poverty - Connecticut
Marriage Poverty - ConnecticutMarriage Poverty - Connecticut
Marriage Poverty - Connecticut
 
Marriage and Poverty - Wisconsin
Marriage and Poverty - WisconsinMarriage and Poverty - Wisconsin
Marriage and Poverty - Wisconsin
 
Marriage Poverty - Missouri
Marriage Poverty - MissouriMarriage Poverty - Missouri
Marriage Poverty - Missouri
 
Marriage & Poverty: Missouri
Marriage & Poverty: MissouriMarriage & Poverty: Missouri
Marriage & Poverty: Missouri
 
Marriage Poverty - Kansas
Marriage Poverty - KansasMarriage Poverty - Kansas
Marriage Poverty - Kansas
 
Marriage & Poverty: New Jersey
Marriage & Poverty: New JerseyMarriage & Poverty: New Jersey
Marriage & Poverty: New Jersey
 
Marriage Poverty - United States
Marriage Poverty - United StatesMarriage Poverty - United States
Marriage Poverty - United States
 
Marriage Poverty - North Dakota
Marriage Poverty - North DakotaMarriage Poverty - North Dakota
Marriage Poverty - North Dakota
 
Marriage & Poverty: Louisiana
Marriage & Poverty: LouisianaMarriage & Poverty: Louisiana
Marriage & Poverty: Louisiana
 
Marriage Poverty - Kentucky
Marriage Poverty - KentuckyMarriage Poverty - Kentucky
Marriage Poverty - Kentucky
 
Marriage Poverty - Louisiana
Marriage Poverty - LouisianaMarriage Poverty - Louisiana
Marriage Poverty - Louisiana
 
Marriage & Poverty: North Dakota
Marriage & Poverty: North DakotaMarriage & Poverty: North Dakota
Marriage & Poverty: North Dakota
 
Marriage & Poverty: South Carolina
Marriage & Poverty: South CarolinaMarriage & Poverty: South Carolina
Marriage & Poverty: South Carolina
 
Marriage & Poverty: Massachusetts
Marriage & Poverty: MassachusettsMarriage & Poverty: Massachusetts
Marriage & Poverty: Massachusetts
 
Marriage Poverty - Nevada
Marriage Poverty - NevadaMarriage Poverty - Nevada
Marriage Poverty - Nevada
 
Marriage Poverty - Texas
Marriage Poverty - TexasMarriage Poverty - Texas
Marriage Poverty - Texas
 
Marriage & Poverty: Pennsylvania
Marriage & Poverty: PennsylvaniaMarriage & Poverty: Pennsylvania
Marriage & Poverty: Pennsylvania
 

Mais de The Heritage Foundation (16)

Tracking the States' Responses to Obamacare
Tracking the States' Responses to ObamacareTracking the States' Responses to Obamacare
Tracking the States' Responses to Obamacare
 
Marriage Poverty - Vermont
Marriage Poverty - VermontMarriage Poverty - Vermont
Marriage Poverty - Vermont
 
Marriage Poverty - Tennessee
Marriage Poverty - TennesseeMarriage Poverty - Tennessee
Marriage Poverty - Tennessee
 
Marriage Poverty - South Dakota
Marriage Poverty - South DakotaMarriage Poverty - South Dakota
Marriage Poverty - South Dakota
 
Marriage Poverty - South Carolina
Marriage Poverty - South CarolinaMarriage Poverty - South Carolina
Marriage Poverty - South Carolina
 
Marriage Poverty - Rhode Island
Marriage Poverty - Rhode IslandMarriage Poverty - Rhode Island
Marriage Poverty - Rhode Island
 
Marriage Poverty - Oregon
Marriage Poverty - OregonMarriage Poverty - Oregon
Marriage Poverty - Oregon
 
Marriage Poverty - Oklahoma
Marriage Poverty - OklahomaMarriage Poverty - Oklahoma
Marriage Poverty - Oklahoma
 
Marriage Poverty - Ohio
Marriage Poverty - OhioMarriage Poverty - Ohio
Marriage Poverty - Ohio
 
Marriage poverty - North Carolina
Marriage poverty - North CarolinaMarriage poverty - North Carolina
Marriage poverty - North Carolina
 
Marriage Poverty - New Hampshire
Marriage Poverty - New HampshireMarriage Poverty - New Hampshire
Marriage Poverty - New Hampshire
 
Marriage Poverty - Nebraska
Marriage Poverty - NebraskaMarriage Poverty - Nebraska
Marriage Poverty - Nebraska
 
Marriage Poverty - Montana
Marriage Poverty - MontanaMarriage Poverty - Montana
Marriage Poverty - Montana
 
Marriage Poverty - Minnesota
Marriage Poverty - MinnesotaMarriage Poverty - Minnesota
Marriage Poverty - Minnesota
 
Marriage Poverty - Michigan
Marriage Poverty - MichiganMarriage Poverty - Michigan
Marriage Poverty - Michigan
 
Marriage Poverty - Massachusetts
Marriage Poverty - MassachusettsMarriage Poverty - Massachusetts
Marriage Poverty - Massachusetts
 

Último

Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptIntegumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptshraddhaparab530
 
Dust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSE
Dust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSEDust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSE
Dust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSEaurabinda banchhor
 
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPHow to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
 
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...Postal Advocate Inc.
 
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptxmary850239
 
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdfInclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdfTechSoup
 
Expanded definition: technical and operational
Expanded definition: technical and operationalExpanded definition: technical and operational
Expanded definition: technical and operationalssuser3e220a
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemChristalin Nelson
 
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Seán Kennedy
 
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdfVirtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdfErwinPantujan2
 
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped dataMeasures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped dataBabyAnnMotar
 
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxHumphrey A Beña
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17Celine George
 
Textual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHS
Textual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHSTextual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHS
Textual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHSMae Pangan
 
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4MiaBumagat1
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)lakshayb543
 

Último (20)

Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptIntegumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
 
Dust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSE
Dust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSEDust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSE
Dust Of Snow By Robert Frost Class-X English CBSE
 
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPHow to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
 
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
 
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
 
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdfInclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
 
Expanded definition: technical and operational
Expanded definition: technical and operationalExpanded definition: technical and operational
Expanded definition: technical and operational
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
 
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
 
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdfVirtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
 
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped dataMeasures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
 
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
 
LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxLEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
YOUVE_GOT_EMAIL_PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE_GOT_EMAIL_PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxYOUVE_GOT_EMAIL_PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE_GOT_EMAIL_PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17
 
Textual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHS
Textual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHSTextual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHS
Textual Evidence in Reading and Writing of SHS
 
Paradigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTA
Paradigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTAParadigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTA
Paradigm shift in nursing research by RS MEHTA
 
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
 

Marriage Greatly Reduces Child Poverty in D.C

  • 1. Marriage: Washington, D.C.’s No. 1 Weapon Against Childhood Poverty How the Collapse of Marriage Hurts Children and Three Steps to Reverse the Damage A Heritage Foundation Book of Charts • 2012 Richard and Helen DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society
  • 2. Growth of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing in Washington, D.C., 1929–2010 Throughout most of the history PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK of the District of Columbia, out- of-wedlock childbearing was 80% relatively uncommon. When the federal government’s 70% War on Poverty began in 1964, around one in four children in 60% Washington, D.C. were born out 54.8% of wedlock. However, over the next four decades, the number 50% rose rapidly. By 2010, 54.8 percent of births in Washington, D.C. 40% occurred outside of marriage. 30% Note: Initiated by President Lyndon Johnson in 1964, the War on Poverty 20% led to the creation of more than three dozen welfare programs to aid poor persons. Government has spent $16.7 10% trillion on means-tested aid to the poor since 1964. 0% Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census Bureau, and National Center for Health 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Statistics. Chart 1 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 3. Death of Marriage in Washington, D.C., 1929–2010 The marital birth rate — the PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN TO MARRIED COUPLES percentage of all births that occur 100% to married parents — is the flip side of the out-of-wedlock birth rate. 90% Through most of the 20th cen- tury, marital births were the norm 80% in Washington, D.C. In 1964, over 74 percent of births occurred to 70% married couples. However, in the mid-1960s, the 60% marital birth rate began to fall steadily. By 2010, only 45.2 per- cent of births in Washington, D.C. 50% occurred to married couples. 45.2% 40% Note: In any given year, the sum of the out-of-wedlock birth rate (Chart 1) 30% and the marital birth rate (Chart 2) equals 100 percent of all births. 20% Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census Bureau, and National Center for Health 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Statistics. Chart 2 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 4. In Washington, D.C., Marriage Drops the Probability of Child Poverty by 90 Percent The rapid rise in out-of- PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN THAT ARE POOR wedlock childbearing is a major 40% cause of high levels of child pov- 36.0% erty in Washington, D.C. 35% Some 36 percent of single moth- ers with children are poor com- 30% pared to 3.5 percent of married couples with children. 25% Single-parent families with children are more than ten times 20% more likely to be poor than fami- lies in which the parents are mar- ried. 15% The higher poverty rate among 10% single-mother families is due both to the lower education levels of 5% 3.5% the mothers and the lower income due to the absence of the father. 0% Single-Parent, Married,Two-Parent Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Female-Headed Families Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Families Chart 3 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 5. In Washington, D.C., Six in Ten Families with Children Are Not Married Overall, married couples head less than 40 percent of families with children in Washington, D.C. Over 60 percent are single-parent families. Married Families Unmarried 38.3% Families 61.7% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 4 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 6. In Washington, D.C., 94 Percent of Poor Families with Children Are Not Married Among poor families with Married children in Washington, D.C., 94 Families percent are not married. By 6.1% contrast, only six percent of poor families with children are headed by married couples. Unmarried Families 93.9% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 5 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 7. In Washington, D.C., Few Unwed Births Occur to Teenagers Out-of-wedlock births are often PERCENTAGE OF OUT-OF-WEDLOCK BIRTHS confused erroneously with teen BY AGE OF MOTHER births, but only 7.9 percent of out-of-wedlock births in Washing- Under ton, D.C. occur to girls under age Age 18: 18. 7.9% By contrast, some 70 percent of out-of-wedlock births occur to Age young adult women between the 30–54: Age ages of 18 and 29. 22.2% 18–19: 12.9% Age Age 25–29: 20–24: 25.1% 31.9% Note: Figures have been rounded. Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data. Chart 6 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 8. Less-Educated Women Are More Likely to Give Birth Outside of Marriage Unwed childbearing occurs most PERCENTAGE OF BIRTHS THAT ARE MARITAL frequently among the women who OR OUT OF WEDLOCK will have the greatest difficulty sup- 100% porting children by themselves: those 8.1% Unmarried with low levels of education. 90% Mothers In the U.S., among women who 42.0% 80% are high school dropouts, about 65.2 percent of all births occur outside 54.5% 70% marriage. Among women who have 65.2% only a high school diploma, well over 60% 91.9% Married half of all births occur outside mar- Mothers riage. By contrast, among women 50% with at least a college degree, only 40% 8.1 percent of births are out of wed- 58.0% lock. 30% 45.5% Note: Specific data on out-of-wedlock 20% births and maternal education are not 34.8% available in Washington, D.C. However, the 10% pattern varies little between states. Wash- ington, D.C. data will be very similar to the 0% national data presented in this chart. High School High School Some College Mother’s Dropout Graduate College Graduate education Source: U.S. Department of Health and (0–11 (12 (13–15 (16+ level Human Services, Centers for Disease Years) Years) Years) Years) Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data. Chart 7 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 9. Both Marriage and Education Are Highly Effective in Reducing Child Poverty in Washington, D.C. The poverty rate of married PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES Poverty Rate of Families by couples with children is dramati- WITH CHILDREN THAT Single Education and Marital Status cally lower than the rate for house- ARE POOR Married of the Head of Household holds headed by single parents. 70% This is true even when the married couple is compared to single par- 59.5% 60% ents with the same education level. For example, in Washington, 50% D.C., the poverty rate for a single 42.5% mother who has only a high 40% school diploma is 42.5 percent, 31.3% but the poverty rate for a married 30% couple family headed by an indi- vidual who, similarly, has only a 20% high school degree is far lower at 14.6% 11.2% 9.2% 11.2 percent. 10% 7.2% On average, marriage drops the 1.2% poverty rate by about 78 percent 0% among families with the same High School High School Some College education level. Dropout Graduate College Graduate Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Note: Virtually none of the heads of families in the chart who are high school Community Survey, 2005–2009 data. dropouts are minor teenagers. Chart 8 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 10. Unwed Birth Rates Vary Strongly by Race in Washington, D.C. Out-of-wedlock childbearing PERCENT OF BIRTHS THAT ARE OUT OF WEDLOCK varies considerably by race. In 2008, 57.8 percent of births 100% in Washington D.C. occurred 8.3% 90% outside marriage. The rate was lowest among non-Hispanic 80% 79.1% whites. Within that group about 72.6% one in 15 births (7 percent) were 70% non-marital. 60% 57.8% Among Hispanics, nearly three in four births were out of wedlock. 50% Among blacks, nearly eight in ten births were to unmarried women 40% (79.1 percent). 30% 20% 10% 7.0% Source: U.S. Department of Health and 0% Human Services, Centers for Disease All Races White Hispanic Black Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS Non- Non- data. Hispanic Hispanic Chart 9 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 11. Growth of Unwed Childbearing Among Blacks in Washington, D.C., 1929–2008 PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK Between 1929 and 1950, around one in five black children in the 100% District of Columbia were born outside marriage. During the 90% Black 1950s and early 1960s the rate rose (Includes slowly. 80% Black Hispanics) Following the onset of the War on Poverty in 1964, the rate 70% Black increased dramatically. Ten years Non- later, in 1974, well over half the 60% Hispanics black births in the District were non-marital. 50% By 1994, eight out of ten black births in D.C. occurred outside 40% marriage. The rate has remained at or near that level up to the present. 30% Note: Beginning in 1996, the govern- 20% ment began counting black Hispanic births separately. This made little 10% difference in the black non-marital birth rate in D.C. 0% Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census Bureau, and National Center for Health 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2008 Statistics. Chart 10 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 12. Growth of Unwed Childbearing Among Whites and Hispanics in Washington, D.C., 1929–2008 Between 1929 and 1963, the unwed PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK birth rate among whites (both Hispanic and non-Hispanic) in Washington, D.C. 100% was generally less than 5 percent. In the mid-1960s the rate increased quickly, 90% reaching 20 percent in 1968. Beginning in 1996, the government 80% began counting white Hispanic and white non-Hispanic births separately. Hispanic Since then, the Hispanic unwed birth 70% rate has risen rapidly. In 1996, 55.3 percent of Hispanic births in the District 60% were non-marital. In 2008, the figure was 72.6 percent. By contrast, the unwed birth rate 50% among white non-Hispanic women has actually fallen, from 12 percent of births 40% White in 1996 to 7 percent in 2008. The (Includes decline in unwed births among white 30% Hispanics) non-Hispanic is unusual and reflects the high socioeconomic status of most white non-Hispanics living in D.C. 20% During the same period, in the rest of the nation, the unwed birth rate of white 10% non-Hispanics has risen significantly. White Non-Hispanics 0% Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census Bureau, and National Center for Health 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2008 Statistics. Chart 11 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 13. Racial Composition of All Births and Out-of-Wedlock Births in Washington, D.C. ALL BIRTHS OUT-OF-WEDLOCK BIRTHS In Washington, D.C. in 2008, some 54.9 percent of all births occurred to non-Hispanic blacks, 25.9 percent occurred to non- Hispanic whites, and 16.5 percent occurred to Hispanics. Because blacks and Hispanics are more likely to have children 54.9% Black Non- 75.1% without being married, they Hispanic account for nearly all out-of- wedlock births in Washington, D.C. In Washington, D.C. in 2008, 75.1 percent of all non-marital births were to non-Hispanic black 25.9% women, 20.7 percent were to Hispanic women, and only 3.1 White Non- 3.1% percent were to white non- Hispanic Hispanic women. 20.7% 16.5% Hispanic Source: U.S. Department of Health and 2.7% Asian/Other 1.1% Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data. Note: Figures have been rounded. Chart 12 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 14. Non-Married Black Families Are Six Times More Likely to Be Poor in Washington, D.C. Marriage leads to lower poverty PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR rates for blacks, whites, and His- panics. 35% In 2009, the poverty rate for married black couples in Washing- 29.8% ton, D.C. was 5.3 percent, while 30% the poverty rate for non-married black families was about six times 25% higher at 29.8 percent. 20% 15% 10% 5.3% 5% 0% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Married Families Non-Married Families Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 13 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 15. Non-Married White Families Are 13 Times More Likely to Be Poor in Washington, D.C. In 2009, the poverty rate for PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR married white families in Wash- ington, D.C. was 0.7 percent. But 10% the poverty rate for non-married white families was nearly 13 times 9% 8.8% higher at 8.8 percent. 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0.7% 0% Married Families Non-Married Families Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 14 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 16. Non-Married Hispanic Families Are Twice as Likely to Be Poor in Washington, D.C. In 2009, the poverty rate for PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR Hispanic married families in Washington, D.C. was 9.3 percent, 25% while the poverty rate among non-married families was over two times higher at 19.3 percent. 20% 19.3% 15% 10% 9.3% 5% 0% Married Families Non-Married Families Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 15 • Marriage and Poverty in Washington, D.C. heritage.org
  • 17. Three Steps to Reduce Child Poverty through Marriage 1) Provide information on the benefits of marriage in reducing child poverty and improving child well-being. Marriage is a highly effective institution which greatly decreases parental and child poverty while improving long-term outcomes for children. Conversely, the absence of marriage greatly increases welfare costs and imposes added burdens on taxpayers. Unfortunately, almost no information on these topics is available in low-income communities. This information deficit should be corrected in the following manner: • Explain the benefits of marriage in middle and high schools with a high proportion of at-risk youth; • Create public education campaigns in low-income communities on the benefits of marriage; and, • Require federally funded birth control clinics to provide information on the benefits of marriage and the skills needed to develop stable families to interested low-income clients. 2) Reduce anti-marriage penalties in means-tested welfare programs. 3) Promote life-goal-planning, marriage-strengthening, and divorce-reduction programs to increase healthy marriages and reduce divorce and separation.
  • 18. The Family & Religion Initiative is one of 10 Transformational Initiatives making up The Heritage Foundation’s Leadership for America campaign. For more products and information related to this initiative or to learn more about the Leadership for America campaign, please visit heritage.org. The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited gov- ernment, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Our vision is to build an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish. As conservatives, we believe the values and ideas that motivated our Founding Fathers are worth conserving. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and values. 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE • Washington, D.C. 20002 • (202) 546-4400 • heritage.org