Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Texas Ports - Value to the Nation
1. Texas Water Conservation Association
Oct. 25-26, 2012
TEXAS PORTS - VALUE TO THE NATION
Col. Christopher W. Sallese
Commander, Galveston District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This briefing is UNCLASSIFIED
US Army Corps of Engineers
BUILDING STRONG®
2. UNCLASSIFIED
USACE SNAPSHOT
USACE projects and the water resources
managed—valued at some $165
billion—generate jobs and contribute to a
stronger economy, environment and
quality of life for all Americans.
USACE is the nation's largest provider of
outdoor recreation opportunities.
USACE is the largest owner and operator
of hydroelectric power plants in the U.S.
and one of the largest in the world.
USACE owns and operates 702 dams and
maintains 12,000 miles of waterways.
USACE’ Regulatory Program protects the
nation's aquatic resources while allowing
effective and efficient
economic development.
BUILDING STRONG®
3. UNCLASSIFIED
AGENDA
TEXAS PORTS – VALUE TO THE NATION
The Texas System
Navigation System Health
Texas Port & Inland Waterway Statistics
Economic Factors
Federal Navigation Funding, National/Texas
Water Control Structures
Post Panamax
Conclusions
BUILDING STRONG®
4. UNCLASSIFIED
The Texas System
Texas is the number one state in the nation for
maritime commerce
760 miles shallow draft
GIWW links the entire system
13 shallow draft ports
240 miles deep draft
15 deep draft ports
4 ports in the top 10
Accounts for over $300 billion in economic value
Provides over one million direct jobs
$40B in private investment happening now
Panama Cannel
Eagle Ford Shale
BUILDING STRONG®
5. UNCLASSIFIED
PETROCHEMICAL PIPELINE DIST.
Houston = $390 million
in commerce per day
Texas Coast - where the U.S. large refinery infrastructure
exists…the main start and end point for the value chain.
BUILDING STRONG®
6. UNCLASSIFIED
PORT STATISTICS & STUDIES
2011
Channel 2010 UNDER STUDY
TEXAS AUTHORIZED TONNAGE (millions) 2010 Availability Value of IMPROVED
PORTS DEPTH (ft) DOMESTIC FOREIGN TOTAL 1/2 Width Tonnage DEPTH (ft) STATUS
Deep Draft Coastal
Construction Completed in 22.2% of
Houston (2) 45 67.6 159.6 227.1 53.3% $170.4B 45 June 2005
Chief's Report Signed July nation’s
Beaumont (4) 40 25.2 51.8 77 12.9% $37.8B 48 2011
total export
Corpus Christi (6) 45 18.8 54.8 73.7 83.8% $35B 52 LRR approval Dec 2012
Construction Completed in
tonnage
Texas City (10) 45 16.5 40.1 56.6 87.5% $28.5B 45 June 2011
Chief's Report Signed July
(maritime)
Port Arthur (25) 40 10.8 19.5 30.2 12.9% $13.1B 48 2011
Chief's Report December
Freeport (27) 45 4.3 22.3 26.7 61.6% $13.7B 50-55 2012
Construction Completed
Galveston (41) 45 5.9 8.0 13.9 76.0% $8.6B 45 March 2011 43.4% of
Matagorda (54) 38 2.2 6.7 8.9 27.5% $2.4B 38 No improvements forecasted imported
Brownsville (78) 42 2.1 2.5 4.6 66.3% $3.1B 45-52 Chief's Report Dec 2013 crude oil
Victoria (89) 12 2.8 0 2.8 62.5% $2.1B 12 No improvements forecasted (maritime)
Inland Waterway
GIWW 12 67.0 Varies $34.6B 12
Texas is the nation's number one state for waterborne commerce
(Major ports = 521.5 million tons worth $314.7 billion) - [source - IWR]
BUILDING STRONG®
7. UNCLASSIFIED
TEXAS EXPORTS
Year Traffic Commodity US SWG SWG US Total SWG Total SWG
Total Tons Total Tons Tons % $-value $-value $-value %
Other Chemical and Related
2010 Overseas-Exports 51,391,464 25,341,797 49.3% $91,129,716,109 $29,410,612,005 32.3%
Products
Distillate, Residuals & other Fuel
2010 Overseas-Exports 55,498,570 28,223,919 50.9% $24,851,646,909 $12,441,380,086 50.1%
Oils; Lube Oil & Grease
Petroleum Pitches, Coke,
2010 Overseas-Exports 34,010,721 14,839,856 43.6% $4,787,161,004 $1,931,017,553 40.3%
Asphalt, Haptha & Solvents
2010 Overseas-Exports Wheat 28,573,473 10,253,744 35.9% $6,303,567,756 $2,285,160,231 36.3%
2010 Overseas-Exports Gasoline, Jet Fuel, Kerosone 25,130,656 16,999,295 67.6% $14,742,150,327 $10,304,486,561 69.9%
Barley, Rye, Oats, Rice and
2010 Overseas-Exports 7,566,469 2,937,633 38.8% $2,530,395,992 $607,559,745 24.0%
Sorgum Grains
All Manufactured Equipment,
2010 Overseas-Exports 22,207,155 2,953,925 13.3% $160,612,903,944 $24,104,041,873 15.0%
Machinery and Products
BUILDING STRONG®
8. UNCLASSIFIED
TEXAS IMPORTS
Year Traffic Commodity US SWG SWG US Total SWG Total SWG
Total Tons Total Tons Tons % $-value $-value $-value %
2010 Overseas-Imports Crude Petroleum 423,611,392 182,804,854 43.2% $200,249,352,676 $86,863,625,063 43.4%
Distillate,Residual & Other Fuel
2010 Overseas-Imports 57,321,506 18,316,053 32.0% $21,521,271,303 $7,289,466,131 33.9%
Oils; Lube Oil & Greases
Other Chemicals and Related
2010 Overseas-Imports 33,196,384 9,455,386 28.5% $54,271,443,752 $6,746,689,271 12.4%
Products
Primary Iron and Steel Products
2010 Overseas-Imports 21,041,435 5,220,000 24.8% $17,740,874,422 $4,973,544,844 28.0%
(Ingots, Bars, Rods)
2010 Overseas-Imports Gasoline, Jet Fuel, Kerosene 36,445,862 5,233,673 14.4% $9,604,883,681 $2,265,694,184 23.6%
2010 Overseas-Imports Non-Ferrous Ores and Scrap 14,559,145 7,315,196 50.2% $3,421,736,181 $559,022,702 16.3%
Sand, Gravel, Stone, Rock,
2010 Overseas-Imports 14,705,864 3,669,977 25.0% $927,612,258 $200,717,480 21.6%
Limestone, Soil, Dredged Material
Building Cement & Concrete, Lime,
2010 Overseas-Imports 9,669,341 1,347,010 13.9% $6,117,946,391 $386,924,711 6.3%
Glass
All Manufactured Equipment,
2010 Overseas-Imports 66,852,486 2,143,044 3.2% $430,852,307,058 $14,579,458,660 3.4%
Machinery and Products
BUILDING STRONG®
9. UNCLASSIFIED
ECONOMIC FACTORS
Positive Factors-
• Texas ports create over 1.0 million direct jobs regionally and ~1.3 million indirect jobs nationally
• Port of Houston alone helped generate $4.5 billion in local and state tax revenue
• Current and future exports help stabilize the dollar the reduce the value of the federal deficit.
(national revenue)
• Allows nation to optimize the benefits of prior year strategic investments in navigation and supply
chain infrastructure
• GIWW provides a intermodal linkage through domestic and international markets and facilities
Negative Factors-
• 1’ of draft restriction = lost benefits due to lightering and lightening loads
Houston - $188 million/year
Matagorda - $80 million/year
GIWW - Texas – 130 million/year
• Texas ports receive less than $.25 on the dollar of HMTF contributions for O&M
• From a study aspect ready to take advantage of Panama Canal expansion
•(Two channels authorized at > 50 feet with two more pending…none constructed)
• The current channels depths do not optimize transportation or supply chain efficiencies
The nation’s navigation system requires a strategic investment to realize
its full economic benefit. BUILDING STRONG®
11. UNCLASSIFIED
NAVIGATION FUNDING
National Navigation Funding
$2.0
Navigation Funding Amounts Includes
Federal Appropriations from:
General Investigations
Billions
$1.0
Construction General
Operations & Maintenance
$0.0
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13
Galveston Navigation Funding
$120
Not Included; $100
Federal Appropriations from: $80
Millions
ARRA $60
Storm Supplemental
$40
$20
$0
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13
BUILDING STRONG®
12. UNCLASSIFIED
SYSTEM HEALTH REQUIREMENTS
Adequate funding stream to support:
Dredging project depth + advanced maintenance ―just in time‖
Construct incremental levee capacity
O&M lock and gated facilities – GIWW
Conduct jetty repairs The system is rapidly losing its
Prepare placement areas and DMMPs resiliency.
Conduct O&M discretionary studies
Implement DAMP activities
Environmental sustainability
Safety (navigation)
In our current strain fiscal environment, we must consider revamping our current
financial options. (HMTF and IWTF changes, user fees, PPP, cost shares)
Navigation Mission
Provide a balance of funds across the required activities to maintain an
efficient, interactive and reliable navigation system
BUILDING STRONG®
13. UNCLASSIFIED
REPORT OBSERVATIONS & FINDINGS
U.S. Port and Inland Waterways Modernization: Preparing for Post-Panamax Vessels
• World trade and U.S. trade is expected to continue to grow
• Post-Panamax size vessels will dominate the world fleet in the future
• These vessels will call in increasing numbers at U.S. ports that can
accommodate them
• Along the Southeast and Gulf Coast there may be opportunities for
economically justified port expansion projects to accommodate post-Panamax
vessels (rising population, trade forecasts and current port capabilities).
View full report: http://tinyurl.com/953xc57
BUILDING STRONG®
14. UNCLASSIFIED
REPORT OBSERVATIONS & FINDINGS
U.S. Port and Inland Waterways Modernization: Preparing for Post-Panamax Vessels
• Investment opportunities at specific ports will need to be individually studied
• Transportation cost saving using post-Panamax size vessels to ship to Asia through the Panama
Canal may lead to an increase in grain traffic on the Mississippi River for export at Gulf ports
• Individual investment opportunities for port expansion can be identified - preliminary estimates
indicate the total investment opportunities may be in the $3-$5 billion range
• Environmental mitigation costs associated with port expansion can be significant and will play
an important role in investment decisions
• The primary challenge with the current process to deliver navigation improvements is to ensure
adequate and timely funding to take advantage of potential opportunities
View full report: http://tinyurl.com/953xc57
BUILDING STRONG®
15. OTHER FACTORS TO CONSIDER
• The need for more multi-modal connectivity and capacity of the intermodal freight
transportation corridors (water-rail-truck)
• Environmental Impacts- avoidance, protection and mitigation
• Opportunities to contribute to the Administration’s initiative to increase exports, energy
independence and enhance national security
• Local sponsor commitment to cost sharing and community support
• Additional consideration for Ports that service multiple regions nation wide verse a local catch
basin (lower use harbors on Texas coastline)
BUILDING STRONG®
16. UNCLASSIFIED
Opportunities Ready Now
Texas Navigation
• Corpus Christi (main channel) – CG to continue PED
• Cedar Bayou – CG for new start construction
• Sabine-Neches Waterway – GI for new start PED
• Brazos Island Harbor – GI to finish ongoing study in 2014
• Freeport Channel Deepening – GI to start PED
Ports that are ready:
•Port of Virginia (Norfolk)
•New York
Ports that are investing:
•Baltimore (ready by 2015)
•Miami is investing $2 billion into improvements
•Savannah is preparing to move forward with a $652 million
deepening project
•South Carolina Legislature has committed $300 million to
dredging for Charleston
Brazos River Floodgates
BUILDING STRONG®
17. UNCLASSIFIED
WHY The GULF? WHY NOW?
Here:
External factors (Panama Canal, Gulf and Brazil oil reserves, LNG, Eagle Ford Shale)
Private industry is postured to invest over $20 billion into infrastructure on the Texas
coast (LNG, DOW , Chevron, BASF, TEPCO)
LNG exports expected to increase
Texas already optimized for energy production
Now:
The number of Post-Panamax vessels in the world fleet is expected to more than double. These
Post-Panamax vessels typically have a minimum hull draft of 39-60 feet.
For liquid bulkers, the world vessel fleet is expected to see an increase similar to the bulkers. The
tankers on order typically have a hull draft is 49-70 feet.
These largest tankers are currently lightered or lightened at gulf ports. No Gulf port has a draft
greater than 50 feet.
Completed navigation studies posture ports for real investment
Texas Gulf navigation system health is getting out of balance and losing resiliency
Rising price of oil, grain and the worldwide demand to for low priced natural gas
Continued deferment of investment incurs annual lost benefits and project cost growth; erodes the
Corps’ value to the nation and our relationship with our partners.
BUILDING STRONG®
18. Sabine-Neches Waterway
Neches River Saltwater Barrier
Project Summary: The project insures freshwater availability for municipal, agricultural
and industrial uses as well as providing for fish and wildlife habitat protection.
Key Partners
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Galveston District and their cost sharing partner, the Lower Neches
Valley Authority, along with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Big Thicket National Preserve, the City of
Beaumont, the Texas Water Development Board, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and many others came together for this project.
BUILDING STRONG®
19. Sabine-Neches Waterway
Neches River Saltwater Barrier
Results and Accomplishments
• Imbedded within the project design were environmental education and recreational
considerations for the public.
• A public boat ramp, public restrooms, picnic area, walking trail, and stocked fishing
ponds provides the public world class facilities as well as increased access to the Neches
River and the Big Thicket National Preserve.
• Aside from protecting the freshwater supply of Southeast Texas, the project provides for
savings of 200,000 acre-feet per year of water, that does not have to be released from
Sam Rayburn reservoir to control the saltwater.
• Continues to insure adequate freshwater inflows into the bays and estuaries.
• The completed project received an Outstanding Performance Appraisal and the 2004
Special Recognition Award for Design and Environmental from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers.
BUILDING STRONG®
20. UNCLASSIFIED
CONCLUSIONS
• Texas is a ready and supportive partner for federal investment into required
navigation improvements which have national benefits
• Keys to success
Port partnerships
Partnership with Dredging Industry
Managing expectations
Strategic communications
Facilitating private investment (risk reduction)
• Texas is in desperate need of comprehensive coastal study to mitigate hurricane
risks
BUILDING STRONG®
The Texas Coast is where our Nation has chosen to invest in large refinery capacity….is not cost-feasible to invest again to build it elsewhere…it is good Value for the Nation to modernize and rehabilitate our Texas navigation channels to allow the Nation to continue realizing the economic benefits of this National Transportation and Refinery infrastructure investment and reality.Links to Nation’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve – storage and inlet/outlet terminals
Update with new information
INSERT CHART HERE
INSERT CHART HERE
To remain competitive in a changing global trade market, the U.S. would need to continue making the justified investments necessary to maintain and improve its navigation transportation infrastructure where it is appropriate and efficient to do so. Understanding the current funding challenges and making long-term plans for operations and maintenance (O&M) and justified investments are critical to developing an effective vision for a competitive navigation system. USACE Civil
Coastal ports • Increase Federal appropriations in the USACE budget for harbor maintenance and improvements while maintaining current cost share responsibilities. • Increase Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund (HMTF) user fees and allocate increased revenues to harbor improvements. • Maintain or increase Federal appropriations and also increase local cost share requirements. • Encourage individual port initiatives by phasing out the HMTF, expecting individual ports to collect their own fees and make their own investment and maintenance decisions. Inland waterways • To support waterway improvements, increase the fuel tax and provide increases in Federal appropriations to track with the increased revenues fl owing into the IWTF; depending upon the revenues from the fuel tax, reduce the share of total costs that is paid from general appropriations. • Replace the fuel tax with a vessel user fee and/or combine the fuel tax with a vessel user fee and increase revenues and appropriations for improvements at least by the amount of the increased revenues.2 • Implement public-private partnerships with the responsibility for improving, operating and maintaining the inland waterway navigation infrastructure along specified segments of the system. Financing for these actions would be secured in private capital markets with revenues to repay the financed activities earned from a combination of vessel user fees (segment fees or lockage fees) and appropriations.
There is currently a lack of post-Panamax capacity at U.S. Gulf and South Atlantic ports – the very regions geographically positioned to potentially be most impacted by the expected changes in the world fleet.The availability of larger, more efficient vessels passing though the new locks on the canal is expected to potentially have at least three major market effects. (1) Currently, there is significant freight shipped to the eastern half of the United States over the intermodal land bridge formed by the rail connections to West Coast ports. The potential for reduced cost of the water route through the canal may cause freight traffic to shift from West Coast to East Coast ports. (2) To take full advantage of the very largest vessels that will be able to fit through the expanded canal but may be too large to call at most U.S. ports, a transshipment service in the Caribbean or a large U.S. port may develop. The largest vessels would unload containers at the transshipment hub for reloading on smaller feeder vessels for delivery to ports with less channel capacity. (3) On the export side the ability to employ large bulk vessels is expected to significantly lower the delivery cost of U.S. agricultural exports to Asia and other foreign markets. This could have a significant impact on both the total quantity of U.S. agricultural exports and commodities moving down the Mississippi River for export at New Orleans.
There are many non-financial factors to be considered when modernizing the Nation’s navigation infrastructure:A modernization strategy should be part of a national transportation strategy that considers multi-modal connectivity and capacity of the intermodal freight transportation corridors. This would necessitate consistency with other Federal programs such as DOT Tiger Grants. Navigation infrastructure modernization will have environmental impacts that will most likely require impact avoidance or replacement of lost environmental quality. Total avoidance of impact may be indicated where the effects are of such national significance that development of transportation infrastructure at the proposed site should not be supported at the Federal level. Opportunities to contribute to the Administration’s initiative to increase exports, energy independence and enhance national security should be considered. Local sponsor commitment in terms of cost sharing and community support should be taken into consideration. Consideration should be given to ports that facilitate traffic to multiple regions of the country as opposed to serving only a local catchment area.When infrastructure projects are planned, designed and implemented, they should explicitly include the concept of adaptive management (i.e., the identification of sequential decisions and implementation based on new knowledge and thresholds) within a risk management framework.
Neches River Saltwater BarrierCongress authorized funding more than 30 years ago to construct the Neches River Saltwater Barrier in Southeast Texas, near Beaumont. As a project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1976, the saltwater barrier was conceived to control water salinity, improve water supply and navigation, and to enhance fish and wildlife recreation. The saltwater barrier impedes the flow of brackish water from the Gulf of Mexico into the Neches River, while allowing barges and recreational boats unfettered access. The region also relies on the Neches River as an important source of high quality water for municipal drinking water, agricultural irrigation and industrial purposes. When the river flow is low because of drought or other environmental influences, saltwater from the Gulf of Mexico can flow upstream. If the saltwater enters water intake structures on the Neches River, the higher salinity can damage crops or contaminate water meant for consumption by humans or livestock. During low-water or drought conditions when the river’s flow is not sufficient to flush the naturally encroaching saltwater back into the sea, a series of five independently operated tainter gates can be closed to manually keep the plume from migrating upstream.The $32 million project also includes a 4,500-square-foot administration building with a water quality laboratory and control rooms; one public and private boat ramp; a 2,000-square-foot boathouse; public restrooms, and access road and parking lots.The completed project received an Outstanding Performance Appraisal and the 2004 Special Recognition Award for Design and Environmental from the Corps of Engineers.