SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 89
Classnotes for ROSE School Course in: Masonry Structures Notes Prepared by: Daniel P. Abrams Willett Professor of Civil Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign October 7, 2004 Lesson 2 and 3:  Properties of Masonry Materials Introduction, compressive strength, modulus of elasticity condition assessment, movements
Historical Use of Masonry as a Structural Material
The First Building Material ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Etemenanki Ziggurat height  91 meters
The First Building Material ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Pyramid of Khafre at Giza
Greek and Roman Architecture ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],El Puente Aqueduct near Segovia Spain 1st Century AD two tiers of arches 28. 5m tall
Applications in China Great Wall of China 6 to 15m. tall 4.6 to 9.1m wide at base ave. 3.7 m wide at top ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Byzantine Architecture ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Hagia Sophia, Istanbul constructed 532-537 AD dome fell after earthquake in 563
Masonry in the Americas Pyramid of the Sun Teotihuacan Mexico 66-m. high 2nd century AD ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Masonry in the Americas Pueblo Bonito Chaco Canyon , NM 10th Century AD covers more than 3 acres ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Romanesque, Gothic and Renaissance  Santa Maria degli Angeli Firenza, Italy constructed 1420-61 AD 39 m. in diameter, 91 m. high Filippo Brunelleschi   ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Masonry at the Turn of the Century ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Monadnock Building Chicago, 1891 D. Burnham and J. Root
Rational Structural Design ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],code of Hammurabi Babylon, 1780 BC
Recent Code Developments ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],MSJC Building Code Requirements for Masonry
Masonry Seismic Provisions ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],NEHRP Provisions for  New Buildings
Present Applications  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Excaliber Hotel, Las Vegas tallest building of structural masonry
Masonry Compressive Strength
Mechanics of Masonry in Compression t j t b P P masonry unit l stresses shown for   mortar  >   unit mortar
Biaxial Strength of Masonry Units direct tensile strength of unit from test f’ udt f’ udt f’ udt f’ ut flat-wise compressive strength of unit from test f’ ut f’ ut brick splits when: compression tension
Biaxial Strength of Mortar multiaxial  compressive  strength mortar crushes when: 4.1 1.0 compression compression uniaxial compressive  strength from test f’ jt f’ jt
Masonry Compressive Strength equilibrium relation: t j t b P P if mortar crushes: if brick splits:
Masonry Compressive Strength if mortar crushes and brick splits simultaneously: where U u  = coefficient of non-uniformity (range 1.1 to 2.5) Hilsdorf equation
Nonlinear Mortar Behavior triaxial test 1000 psi v l 1000 psi 30 psi
Unit Splitting vs. Mortar Crushing Linear Mortar f’ udt unit failure envelope mortar failure envelope tension compression unit stress path mortar stress path mortar  crushes failure f’ jt f’ ut
Unit Splitting vs. Mortar Crushing Nonlinear Mortar tension compression f’ udt mortar failure envelope unit failure envelope failure unit stress path mortar stress path unit splits f’ ut f’ jt
Incremental Lateral Tensile Stress on Masonry Unit From Atkinson and Noland “A Proposed Failure Theory for Brick Masonry in Compression ,” Proceedings, Third Canadian Masonry Symposium,  Edmonton, 1983, pp. 5-1 to 5-17. Assuming linear behavior for masonry unit, and nonlinear mortar behavior:
Effect of Mortar on Compression ,[object Object],[object Object],M S N O Weaker Mortars
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Effect of Mortar on Compression M S N O Stronger Mortars
Guidelines for Prism Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],UBC Sec. 2105.3.2:  Masonry Prism Testing Note that testing is not required if half of allowable stresses are used for design. NCMA TEK 18-1  Concrete Masonry Prism Testing
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Guidelines for Prism Testing UBC Standard 21-17:  Test Method for Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms prism h/t p correction factor Table 21-17A 1.3 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0 5.0 0.75 0.86 1.00 1.04 1.07 1.15 1.22 Use lesser of average strength or 1.25 times least strength. h t p
Code Values for Prism Strength ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],UBC Sec. 2105.3.4:  Unit Strength Method Associated BIA Technical Note:  35  Early Strength of Brick Masonry
Compressive Strength of Masonry per UBC   UBC Table 21-D Type M/S mortar Type N mortar 14,000 or more  12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 5,300 4,700 4,000 3,350 2,700 2,000 4,400 3,800 3,300 2,750 2,200 1,600 Specified compressive strength of clay masonry, f’ m Specified Compressive Strength of Masonry, f’ m ,  (psi) Compressive Strength of Clay Masonry Units (psi)
Compressive Strength of Masonry per UBC UBC Table 21-D Type N mortar 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 2,800 2,350 1,850 1,350 950 Specified compressive strength of concrete masonry, f’ m Type M/S mortar 4,800 or more 3,750 2,800 1,900 1,250 Specified Compressive Strength of Masonry, f’ m ,  (psi) Compressive Strength of Concrete Masonry  Units  (psi)
MSJC Specifications for Prism Strength ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Compressive Strength of Masonry per MSJC MSJC Specification Table 1 Net Area Compressive Strength of Clay Masonry Units  (psi) Type M/S Mortar Type N Mortar Net Area Compressive Strength of Masonry ( psi) 1,700 3,350 4,950 6,600 8,250 9,900 13,200 2,100  4,150 6,200 8,250 10,300 - - 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 Compressive strength of clay masonry by unit strength method
Compressive Strength of Masonry per MSJC MSJC Specification Table 2 Compressive Strength of Concrete Masonry Units  (psi) Type M/S Mortar Type N Mortar Net Area Compressive Strength of Masonry  (psi) 1,250 1,900 2,800  3,750 4,800 1,300  2,150 3,050 4,050 5,250 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Compressive strength of concrete masonry by unit strength method MSJC values of compressive strength from Table 1 and Table 2 are intended to be used in lieu of prism tests to estimate needed mortar types and unit strengths for a required compressive strength.
Comparison of Default Prism Strengths UBC Table 21-D vs. MSJC Specifications Table 1 Default prism strengths are lower bounds to expected values.
Comparison of Default Prism Strengths UBC Table 21-D vs. Table 2 MSJC-Spec. Note:  MSJC and UBC values are almost  identical for concrete masonry.  Default prism strengths are lower bounds to expected values.
Masonry Elastic Modulus
Elastic Modulus of Masonry in Compression Basic Mechanics  t j t b P =   y  A net [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
Elastic Modulus of Masonry in Compression Basic Mechanics Reference:  Structural Masonry  by S. Sahlin, Section D.2 [8]  t j t b P =   y  A net [12] [9] [10] [11]
Elastic Modulus of Masonry in Compression 1.2 concrete block masonry clay-unit masonry 0.76 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2  t = 0.0498 (typical for concrete block masonry)  t = 0.152 (typical for brick masonry)
Code Assumptions for Elastic Modulus UBC Sec. 2106.2.12 and 2106.2.13 & MSJC Sec. 1.8.2.2.1 and 1.8.2.2.2 secant method f m  m MSJC Sec. 1.8.2.1.1 for clay-unit masonry E m  = 700 f’ m for concrete-unit masonry E m  = 900 f’ m UBC 2106.2.13 MSJC Sec. 1.8.2.2.2 G = 0.4 E m estimate without prism test data UBC Sec. 2106.2.12.1 for clay-unit or concrete masonry E m  = 750 f’ m  < 3000 ksi f’ mt E m 0.33 f’ mt 0.05 f’ mt
Strength of URM Bearing Walls
Unreinforced Bearing and Shear Walls ,[object Object],Structural Walls have 3 functions: Ref: BIA Tech. Note 24  The Contemporary Bearing Wall  ,[object Object],[object Object],in-plane shear and moment (shear wall) transverse loads (out-of-plane wall) floor or roof loads (bearing wall)
Unreinforced Bearing and Shear Walls Historically walls were sized in terms of h/t ratio which was limited to 25. Empirical design of masonry UBC 2105.2  h < 35 ’ Associated BIA Technical Note:  24 series  The Contemporary Bearing Wall Building wind = 15 psf h
Concentric Axial Compression Buckling Load Euler buckling load: P  =   y  A net t   h’ = kl for rectangular section:
Concentric Axial Compression Note: for MSJC and UBC plot,  r=0.289t is assumed  h’/t 25 50 75 100  y 0.25 f’ m MSJC/UBC f’ m 24.8 Euler curve
Code Allowable Compressive Stress 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0 50 100 150 200 for h’/r > 99  :  F a  = 0.25 f’ m  [(70r/h’) 2 ] MSJC Eq. 2-13 and UBC Eq. 7-40 MSJC  Section 2.2.3 and UBC Section 2107.3.2: for h’/r < = 99:  F a  = 0.25 f’ m  [1 - (h’/140r) 2 ]  MSJC Eq. 2-12 and UBC Eq. 7-39
Concentric Axial Compression UBC 2106.2.4:  Effective Wall Height translation restrained no sidesway restraint MSJC 2.2.3: Buckling Loads e = eccentricity of axial load rotation restrained 2.0 rotation unrestrained 2.0 h’=kh rotation restrained 0.70 h rotation unrestrained 1.0 k = h’/h
Concentric Axial Compression UBC 2106.2.3:  Effective Wall Thickness A. Single Wythe t = specified thickness t mortar or  grout filled collar joint B. Multiwythe C. Cavity Walls each wythe considered separate both wythes loaded P 1 P 2 t 1 t 2 air space wire joint reinforcement P t 1 t 2 one wythe loaded
Concentric Axial Compression Neglect web area if face-shell bedding is used. UBC 2106.2.5:  Effective Wall Area Effective area is minimum area of mortar bed joints plus any grouted area. face shell effective thickness raked joint effective thickness
Example: Concentric Axial Compression  Determine the allowable vertical load capacity of the unreinforced cavity wall shown below per both the UBC and the MSJC requirements. Per NCMA TEK 14-1A for face shell bedding: A net  = 30.0 in 2  I net  = 308.7 in 4  r = 2.84 in. (r based only on loaded wythe) P a concrete footing 20’-0” Case “A”:  Prisms have been tested. f’ m  = 2500 psi for block wall f’ m  = 5000 psi for brick wall Case “B”:  No prisms have been tested. (Type I CMU’s and  Type S mortar will be specified.) f’ m  = 1500 psi for block wall metal ties face-shell bedding 7.63” 8”CMU 3.63” 4” brick
Example: Case “A” MSJC  Section 2.2.3 & UBC 2107.3.2 *  no buckling check per UBC. P a  = 11.9 kip / ft for both codes  MSJC  Section 2.2.3:  check buckling *
Example:  Case “B” MSJC  Section 2.2.3 & UBC 2107.3.2 MSJC  Section 2.2.3:  check buckling  Governs for MSJC, take 1/2 for UBC since no special inspection is provided.
Eccentric Axial Compression Ref:  NCMA TEK 14-4  Eccentric Loading of Nonreinforced Concrete Masonry h P e Pe t combined axial stress plus bending f a  + f b -f a  + f b axial stress P bending stress M = Pe
Eccentric Axial Compression References Associated NCMA TEK Note 31 Eccentric Loading of Nonreinforced Concrete Masonry (1971) Associated BIA Technical Note 24B  Design Examples of Contemporary Bearing Walls 24E  Design Tables for Columns and Walls where  F a = allowable axial compressive stress  (UBC 2107.3.2 or MSJC Sec. 2.2.3)  F b = allowable flexural compressive stress = 0.33  f´ m   (UBC 2107.3.3 or MSJC Sec 2.2.3)   limiting compressive stress (controls for small e’s) UBC Section 2107.2.7 and MSJC 2.2.3:  Unity Formula limiting tensile stress   -f a  + f b  <  F t where  F t   = allowable tensile stress (controls for large e’s) UBC 2107.3.5 or MSJC 2.2.3:  Allowable Tensile Stress
Allowable Tensile Stresses, F t MSJC Table 2.2.3.2 and UBC Table 21-I 40  25  68* 80  50  80* 30  19  58* 60  38  60* 24  15  41* 48  30  48* 15  9  26* 30  19  29* * grouted masonry is addressed only by MSJC all units are (psi) Direction of Tension and Type of Masonry Mortar Type Portland Cement/Lime or Mortar Cement Masonry Cement/Lime M or S M or S N N tension normal to bed joints solid units hollow units fully grouted units tension parallel to bed joints solid units hollow units fully grouted units
Allowable Flexural Tensile Stresses, F t weak units flexural tension parallel to bed joints strong units No direct tensile strength assumed normal to head joints, just shear strength along bed joint. flexural tension normal to bed joints Note:  direct tensile stresses across wall thickness is not allowed per UBC or MSJC.
Example: Eccentric Axial Compression f’ m  = 2000 psi (from tests) Type S mortar Determine the allowable vertical load capacity per UBC and MSJC. Per NCMA Tek 141A:  (per running foot)   A net  = 30.0 in 2 I x = 309 in 4 S x  = 81.0 in 3 r= 2.84” F t  = 25 psi per UBC 2107.3.5 and MSJC Table 2.2.3.2 e = 3.0” concrete footing 20’-0” P a 7.63” 8”CMU ungrouted face-shell bedding 1.25”
Example Tension controlling:
Example Compression controlling: UBC 2107.3.4 and MSJC 2.2.3
Example  MSJC  Section 2.2.3:  Check Buckling (no buckling check per UBC)   Code UBC MSJC P a  (lbs) Tension Compression Buckling 6750 6233 6750 6233 ----- 1417
Kern Distance for URM Wall e = t/6 f a  + f b e Assuming F t  = 0 for solid section. -f a  + f b  = 0 t P = + f a   f b   b t/3 t b/3 kern If load is within kern,  then no net tensile stress.
Kern Distance for URM Wall Specific Tensile Strength, F t , for solid section. f a  + f b e -f a  + f b  = F t t P = + f a   f b   b t kern If load is within kern,  then tensile stress < F t .
Strength of Walls with no Tensile Strength Resultant load inside of kern. f m P e P t
Strength of Walls with no Tensile Strength Neglect all masonry in tension. Note:  This approach is outside of UBC and MSJC since F t  may be exceeded.   Partially cracked wall is not prismatic along its height.  Stability of the wall must be checked based on Euler criteria modified to account for zones of cracked masonry.  Analytical derivation for this case is provided in Chapter E of  Structural Masonry  by S. Sahlin. Resultant load outside of kern. P e t t/2 f m P [1] [2] [3] [4]
Example Part (a)   e = 1.0 in. < t/6 = 1.27 in. within kern! Part (b)   e = 2.5 in. > t/6 = 1.27 in. outside of kern! Determine the maximum compressive edge stress. e two-wythe brick wall P = 10 kip/ft. t = 7.63”
Condition Assessment
Insitu Material Properties ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Insitu Material Properties ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Condition Assessment ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Condition Assessment ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Movements
Differential Movements ,[object Object],Ref:  BIA Tech. Note 18  Movement - Volume Changes and Effect of Movement, Part I ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],shrink expand
Coefficients of Thermal Expansion Thermal coefficients for other structural materials can be found in BIA Technical Note 18. Concrete Masonry dense aggregate     5.2   0.62 Stone granite     4.7   0.56 fire clay brick or tile   2.5 0.30 clay or shale tile     3.3 0.40 cinder aggregate     3.1 0.37 expanded shale aggregate  4.3 0.52 expanded slag aggregate  4.6 0.55 pumice or cinder aggregate  4.1 0.49 limestone   4.4  0.53 marble    7.3 0.88 Clay Masonry  clay or shale brick   3.6   0.43 Material Ave. Coefficient of Linear Thermal Expansion (x 10 -6  strain/ o F) Thermal Expansion (inches per 100’ for  100 o F  temperature increase)
Moisture Movements ,[object Object],Moisture Expansion of Clay Masonry = 0.020% Freezing Expansion of Clay Masonry  = 0.015% ,[object Object]
Moisture Movements in Concrete Masonry ,[object Object],Moisture Content, % of Total Absorption (average of three units) Linear Shrinkage, % Humidity Conditions at Job Site humid intermediate arid 0.03 or less 45    40   35 0.03 to 0.045 40   35   30 0.045 to 0.065 35   30   25
Control Joints in Concrete Masonry ,[object Object],Spacing recommendations per ACI for Type I moisture controlled units. Cut spacing in half for Type II and reduce by one-third for solidly grouted walls. Vertical  S pacing  of  Joint  Reinforcement Recommended control joint spacing None 24” 16” 8” Ratio of panel length to height, L/h 2 2.5 3 4 Panel length in feet (not to exceed L regardless of H) 40 45 50 60
Control Joints in Concrete Masonry ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Control Joint Details for Concrete Masonry Ref.  NCMA TEK 10-2A  Control Joints in Concrete Masonry Walls control joint unit grout fill paper raked head joint  and caulk
Expansion Joints in Clay Masonry Pressure-relieving  or  expansion joints  accommodate expansion of clay masonry.   Ref:  Masonry Design and Detailing , Christine Beall, McGraw-Hill  BIA Tech. Note 18A Movement - Design and Detailing of Movement Joints, Part II expansion joint
Spacing of Expansion Joints  For brick masonry:   where W = total wall expansion in inches 0.0002 = coefficient of moisture expansion 0.0000043 = coefficient of thermal expansion L = length of wall in inches T max = maximum mean wall temperature, °F T min  = minimum mean wall temperature, °F L )] T T ( 0000045 . 0 0002 . 0 [ W min max    min max T T ) p ( 000 , 24 S   S = maximum spacing of joints in inches p = ratio of opaque wall area to gross wall area
Expansion Joint Details for Brick Veneer Walls 20 oz. copper silicone or butyl sealant neoprene extruded plastic
Vertical Expansion of Veneer rc beam concrete block joint reinforcement  or wire tie clay-brick veneer compressible filler  flashing with weep holes steel shelf angle 1/4” to 3/8” min. clearance
Expansion Problems In cavity walls, cracks can form at an external corner because the outside wythe experiences a larger temperature expansion than the inside wythe.  sun
Expansion Problems ,[object Object]
Expansion Problems ,[object Object],Concrete  Foundation Brick  Veneer Concrete  Foundation Brick  Veneer
Expansion Problems ,[object Object],parapet roof sun Elongation will be longer than for wall below.
End of Lessons 2 and 3

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

52436966 lecture-13-plate-girders
52436966 lecture-13-plate-girders52436966 lecture-13-plate-girders
52436966 lecture-13-plate-girdersSaleem Malik
 
Limit state, working stress, ultimate load method - Detailed Concept
Limit state, working stress, ultimate load method - Detailed ConceptLimit state, working stress, ultimate load method - Detailed Concept
Limit state, working stress, ultimate load method - Detailed ConceptCivil Insider
 
Yield line theory
Yield line theoryYield line theory
Yield line theoryVikas Mehta
 
Design of R.C.C Beam
Design of R.C.C BeamDesign of R.C.C Beam
Design of R.C.C BeamAr. Aakansha
 
crack control and crack width estimation
crack control and crack width estimationcrack control and crack width estimation
crack control and crack width estimationKumar Anjneya
 
Redistribution of moments-Part-1
Redistribution of moments-Part-1Redistribution of moments-Part-1
Redistribution of moments-Part-1Subhash Patankar
 
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear Walls
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear WallsLecture 6 7 Rm Shear Walls
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear WallsTeja Ande
 
Introduction of Reinforced Concrete Design
Introduction of Reinforced Concrete DesignIntroduction of Reinforced Concrete Design
Introduction of Reinforced Concrete Designmaylene san luis
 
Unit IV composite beams and continuous beams
Unit IV composite beams and continuous beamsUnit IV composite beams and continuous beams
Unit IV composite beams and continuous beamsSelvakumar Palanisamy
 
Static and Kinematic Indeterminacy of Structure.
Static and Kinematic Indeterminacy of Structure.Static and Kinematic Indeterminacy of Structure.
Static and Kinematic Indeterminacy of Structure.Pritesh Parmar
 
W.h.mosley, j.h.bungey. reinforced concrete design book
W.h.mosley, j.h.bungey. reinforced concrete design bookW.h.mosley, j.h.bungey. reinforced concrete design book
W.h.mosley, j.h.bungey. reinforced concrete design bookReyam AL Mousawi
 

Mais procurados (20)

52436966 lecture-13-plate-girders
52436966 lecture-13-plate-girders52436966 lecture-13-plate-girders
52436966 lecture-13-plate-girders
 
Limit state, working stress, ultimate load method - Detailed Concept
Limit state, working stress, ultimate load method - Detailed ConceptLimit state, working stress, ultimate load method - Detailed Concept
Limit state, working stress, ultimate load method - Detailed Concept
 
Yield line theory
Yield line theoryYield line theory
Yield line theory
 
Design of R.C.C Beam
Design of R.C.C BeamDesign of R.C.C Beam
Design of R.C.C Beam
 
Retaining wall
 Retaining wall  Retaining wall
Retaining wall
 
Shear wall
Shear wallShear wall
Shear wall
 
Prestressed composite beams
Prestressed composite beamsPrestressed composite beams
Prestressed composite beams
 
crack control and crack width estimation
crack control and crack width estimationcrack control and crack width estimation
crack control and crack width estimation
 
Redistribution of moments-Part-1
Redistribution of moments-Part-1Redistribution of moments-Part-1
Redistribution of moments-Part-1
 
Design of reinforced concrete beam
Design of reinforced concrete beamDesign of reinforced concrete beam
Design of reinforced concrete beam
 
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear Walls
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear WallsLecture 6 7 Rm Shear Walls
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear Walls
 
Introduction of Reinforced Concrete Design
Introduction of Reinforced Concrete DesignIntroduction of Reinforced Concrete Design
Introduction of Reinforced Concrete Design
 
Unit IV composite beams and continuous beams
Unit IV composite beams and continuous beamsUnit IV composite beams and continuous beams
Unit IV composite beams and continuous beams
 
ETABS Modelling
ETABS ModellingETABS Modelling
ETABS Modelling
 
Design of steel beams
Design of steel beamsDesign of steel beams
Design of steel beams
 
Static and Kinematic Indeterminacy of Structure.
Static and Kinematic Indeterminacy of Structure.Static and Kinematic Indeterminacy of Structure.
Static and Kinematic Indeterminacy of Structure.
 
Concrete Mix Design
Concrete Mix DesignConcrete Mix Design
Concrete Mix Design
 
Shear wall and its design guidelines
Shear wall and its design guidelinesShear wall and its design guidelines
Shear wall and its design guidelines
 
W.h.mosley, j.h.bungey. reinforced concrete design book
W.h.mosley, j.h.bungey. reinforced concrete design bookW.h.mosley, j.h.bungey. reinforced concrete design book
W.h.mosley, j.h.bungey. reinforced concrete design book
 
Staircase design
Staircase designStaircase design
Staircase design
 

Semelhante a Lecture 2 3 Compression, Condition Assess

Krishna final overall ppt (2) eccentrically loaded masonry walls
Krishna final overall ppt (2) eccentrically loaded masonry wallsKrishna final overall ppt (2) eccentrically loaded masonry walls
Krishna final overall ppt (2) eccentrically loaded masonry wallskrishna
 
Seismic Retrofitting of RC Building with Jacketing and Shear Wall Seismic Ret...
Seismic Retrofitting of RC Buildingwith Jacketing and Shear Wall Seismic Ret...Seismic Retrofitting of RC Buildingwith Jacketing and Shear Wall Seismic Ret...
Seismic Retrofitting of RC Building with Jacketing and Shear Wall Seismic Ret...Bala murali
 
Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...
Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...
Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...ijsrd.com
 
Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...
Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...
Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...ijsrd.com
 
Influence of Modeling Masonry Infill on Seismic Performance of Multi-Storeyed...
Influence of Modeling Masonry Infill on Seismic Performance of Multi-Storeyed...Influence of Modeling Masonry Infill on Seismic Performance of Multi-Storeyed...
Influence of Modeling Masonry Infill on Seismic Performance of Multi-Storeyed...ijsrd.com
 
LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS OF SOFT STORY BUILDING AND IMPORTANCE OF MODELING MASON...
LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS OF SOFT STORY BUILDING AND IMPORTANCE OF MODELING MASON...LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS OF SOFT STORY BUILDING AND IMPORTANCE OF MODELING MASON...
LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS OF SOFT STORY BUILDING AND IMPORTANCE OF MODELING MASON...ijsrd.com
 
Design of Retaining Wall
Design of Retaining WallDesign of Retaining Wall
Design of Retaining WallAnanthakumar75
 
Design guide for walls containing bond beams
Design guide for walls containing bond beamsDesign guide for walls containing bond beams
Design guide for walls containing bond beamshsaam hsaam
 
Details of RCC Building
Details of RCC BuildingDetails of RCC Building
Details of RCC Buildingppt_master
 
The Experimental Behavior Researches of the Reinforced Concrete Beams Bending...
The Experimental Behavior Researches of the Reinforced Concrete Beams Bending...The Experimental Behavior Researches of the Reinforced Concrete Beams Bending...
The Experimental Behavior Researches of the Reinforced Concrete Beams Bending...IJERA Editor
 
Presentation on earthquake resistance massonary structure
Presentation on earthquake resistance  massonary structurePresentation on earthquake resistance  massonary structure
Presentation on earthquake resistance massonary structureRadhey Verma
 
ACoRCE 2015 Paper number 004 - for merge
ACoRCE 2015 Paper number 004 - for mergeACoRCE 2015 Paper number 004 - for merge
ACoRCE 2015 Paper number 004 - for mergeMark Maina
 
Importance of Modeling of Masonry Infill and Effect of Soft Storey on Seismic...
Importance of Modeling of Masonry Infill and Effect of Soft Storey on Seismic...Importance of Modeling of Masonry Infill and Effect of Soft Storey on Seismic...
Importance of Modeling of Masonry Infill and Effect of Soft Storey on Seismic...ijsrd.com
 
Shear wall ppt presentation useful for BE
Shear wall ppt presentation useful for BEShear wall ppt presentation useful for BE
Shear wall ppt presentation useful for BENandan Gowda
 
earthquake resistant design
earthquake resistant designearthquake resistant design
earthquake resistant designAditya Sanyal
 
Comparative Study of RC Structures with Different Types of Infill Walls with ...
Comparative Study of RC Structures with Different Types of Infill Walls with ...Comparative Study of RC Structures with Different Types of Infill Walls with ...
Comparative Study of RC Structures with Different Types of Infill Walls with ...IRJET Journal
 
Seismic Analysis on Bare Frame, Infilled Frame and Soft Story RC Framed Build...
Seismic Analysis on Bare Frame, Infilled Frame and Soft Story RC Framed Build...Seismic Analysis on Bare Frame, Infilled Frame and Soft Story RC Framed Build...
Seismic Analysis on Bare Frame, Infilled Frame and Soft Story RC Framed Build...IRJET Journal
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is publis...
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is publis...Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is publis...
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is publis...researchinventy
 

Semelhante a Lecture 2 3 Compression, Condition Assess (20)

Krishna final overall ppt (2) eccentrically loaded masonry walls
Krishna final overall ppt (2) eccentrically loaded masonry wallsKrishna final overall ppt (2) eccentrically loaded masonry walls
Krishna final overall ppt (2) eccentrically loaded masonry walls
 
Seismic Retrofitting of RC Building with Jacketing and Shear Wall Seismic Ret...
Seismic Retrofitting of RC Buildingwith Jacketing and Shear Wall Seismic Ret...Seismic Retrofitting of RC Buildingwith Jacketing and Shear Wall Seismic Ret...
Seismic Retrofitting of RC Building with Jacketing and Shear Wall Seismic Ret...
 
Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...
Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...
Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...
 
Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...
Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...
Lateral Load Analysis of Shear Wall and Concrete Braced Multi-Storeyed R.C Fr...
 
Influence of Modeling Masonry Infill on Seismic Performance of Multi-Storeyed...
Influence of Modeling Masonry Infill on Seismic Performance of Multi-Storeyed...Influence of Modeling Masonry Infill on Seismic Performance of Multi-Storeyed...
Influence of Modeling Masonry Infill on Seismic Performance of Multi-Storeyed...
 
2327
23272327
2327
 
LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS OF SOFT STORY BUILDING AND IMPORTANCE OF MODELING MASON...
LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS OF SOFT STORY BUILDING AND IMPORTANCE OF MODELING MASON...LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS OF SOFT STORY BUILDING AND IMPORTANCE OF MODELING MASON...
LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS OF SOFT STORY BUILDING AND IMPORTANCE OF MODELING MASON...
 
Design of Retaining Wall
Design of Retaining WallDesign of Retaining Wall
Design of Retaining Wall
 
Design guide for walls containing bond beams
Design guide for walls containing bond beamsDesign guide for walls containing bond beams
Design guide for walls containing bond beams
 
appr technologies.pdf
appr technologies.pdfappr technologies.pdf
appr technologies.pdf
 
Details of RCC Building
Details of RCC BuildingDetails of RCC Building
Details of RCC Building
 
The Experimental Behavior Researches of the Reinforced Concrete Beams Bending...
The Experimental Behavior Researches of the Reinforced Concrete Beams Bending...The Experimental Behavior Researches of the Reinforced Concrete Beams Bending...
The Experimental Behavior Researches of the Reinforced Concrete Beams Bending...
 
Presentation on earthquake resistance massonary structure
Presentation on earthquake resistance  massonary structurePresentation on earthquake resistance  massonary structure
Presentation on earthquake resistance massonary structure
 
ACoRCE 2015 Paper number 004 - for merge
ACoRCE 2015 Paper number 004 - for mergeACoRCE 2015 Paper number 004 - for merge
ACoRCE 2015 Paper number 004 - for merge
 
Importance of Modeling of Masonry Infill and Effect of Soft Storey on Seismic...
Importance of Modeling of Masonry Infill and Effect of Soft Storey on Seismic...Importance of Modeling of Masonry Infill and Effect of Soft Storey on Seismic...
Importance of Modeling of Masonry Infill and Effect of Soft Storey on Seismic...
 
Shear wall ppt presentation useful for BE
Shear wall ppt presentation useful for BEShear wall ppt presentation useful for BE
Shear wall ppt presentation useful for BE
 
earthquake resistant design
earthquake resistant designearthquake resistant design
earthquake resistant design
 
Comparative Study of RC Structures with Different Types of Infill Walls with ...
Comparative Study of RC Structures with Different Types of Infill Walls with ...Comparative Study of RC Structures with Different Types of Infill Walls with ...
Comparative Study of RC Structures with Different Types of Infill Walls with ...
 
Seismic Analysis on Bare Frame, Infilled Frame and Soft Story RC Framed Build...
Seismic Analysis on Bare Frame, Infilled Frame and Soft Story RC Framed Build...Seismic Analysis on Bare Frame, Infilled Frame and Soft Story RC Framed Build...
Seismic Analysis on Bare Frame, Infilled Frame and Soft Story RC Framed Build...
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is publis...
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is publis...Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is publis...
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is publis...
 

Mais de Teja Ande

Numerical Methods
Numerical MethodsNumerical Methods
Numerical MethodsTeja Ande
 
Response Spectrum
Response SpectrumResponse Spectrum
Response SpectrumTeja Ande
 
Ground Excited Systems
Ground Excited SystemsGround Excited Systems
Ground Excited SystemsTeja Ande
 
Approximate Methods
Approximate MethodsApproximate Methods
Approximate MethodsTeja Ande
 
Base Excited Systems
Base Excited SystemsBase Excited Systems
Base Excited SystemsTeja Ande
 
Lesson14 Exmpl
Lesson14 ExmplLesson14 Exmpl
Lesson14 ExmplTeja Ande
 
Lesson9 2nd Part
Lesson9 2nd PartLesson9 2nd Part
Lesson9 2nd PartTeja Ande
 
Lecture 13 Building Populations
Lecture 13 Building PopulationsLecture 13 Building Populations
Lecture 13 Building PopulationsTeja Ande
 
Lecture 11 Performance Based Evaluation
Lecture 11 Performance Based EvaluationLecture 11 Performance Based Evaluation
Lecture 11 Performance Based EvaluationTeja Ande
 
Lecture 10 Urm Out Of Plane Walls Part 2
Lecture 10 Urm Out Of Plane Walls Part 2Lecture 10 Urm Out Of Plane Walls Part 2
Lecture 10 Urm Out Of Plane Walls Part 2Teja Ande
 
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear Walls
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear WallsLecture 6 7 Rm Shear Walls
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear WallsTeja Ande
 
Lecture 4 5 Urm Shear Walls
Lecture 4 5 Urm Shear WallsLecture 4 5 Urm Shear Walls
Lecture 4 5 Urm Shear WallsTeja Ande
 

Mais de Teja Ande (20)

Numerical Methods
Numerical MethodsNumerical Methods
Numerical Methods
 
Sdof
SdofSdof
Sdof
 
Response Spectrum
Response SpectrumResponse Spectrum
Response Spectrum
 
Mdof
MdofMdof
Mdof
 
Ground Excited Systems
Ground Excited SystemsGround Excited Systems
Ground Excited Systems
 
Approximate Methods
Approximate MethodsApproximate Methods
Approximate Methods
 
Base Excited Systems
Base Excited SystemsBase Excited Systems
Base Excited Systems
 
Sam Session
Sam SessionSam Session
Sam Session
 
Lesson14 Exmpl
Lesson14 ExmplLesson14 Exmpl
Lesson14 Exmpl
 
Lesson14
Lesson14Lesson14
Lesson14
 
Lesson10
Lesson10Lesson10
Lesson10
 
Lesson9 2nd Part
Lesson9 2nd PartLesson9 2nd Part
Lesson9 2nd Part
 
Lesson8
Lesson8Lesson8
Lesson8
 
Lesson9
Lesson9Lesson9
Lesson9
 
Lecture 13 Building Populations
Lecture 13 Building PopulationsLecture 13 Building Populations
Lecture 13 Building Populations
 
Lesson1
Lesson1Lesson1
Lesson1
 
Lecture 11 Performance Based Evaluation
Lecture 11 Performance Based EvaluationLecture 11 Performance Based Evaluation
Lecture 11 Performance Based Evaluation
 
Lecture 10 Urm Out Of Plane Walls Part 2
Lecture 10 Urm Out Of Plane Walls Part 2Lecture 10 Urm Out Of Plane Walls Part 2
Lecture 10 Urm Out Of Plane Walls Part 2
 
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear Walls
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear WallsLecture 6 7 Rm Shear Walls
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear Walls
 
Lecture 4 5 Urm Shear Walls
Lecture 4 5 Urm Shear WallsLecture 4 5 Urm Shear Walls
Lecture 4 5 Urm Shear Walls
 

Lecture 2 3 Compression, Condition Assess

  • 1. Classnotes for ROSE School Course in: Masonry Structures Notes Prepared by: Daniel P. Abrams Willett Professor of Civil Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign October 7, 2004 Lesson 2 and 3: Properties of Masonry Materials Introduction, compressive strength, modulus of elasticity condition assessment, movements
  • 2. Historical Use of Masonry as a Structural Material
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 17. Mechanics of Masonry in Compression t j t b P P masonry unit l stresses shown for  mortar >  unit mortar
  • 18. Biaxial Strength of Masonry Units direct tensile strength of unit from test f’ udt f’ udt f’ udt f’ ut flat-wise compressive strength of unit from test f’ ut f’ ut brick splits when: compression tension
  • 19. Biaxial Strength of Mortar multiaxial compressive strength mortar crushes when: 4.1 1.0 compression compression uniaxial compressive strength from test f’ jt f’ jt
  • 20. Masonry Compressive Strength equilibrium relation: t j t b P P if mortar crushes: if brick splits:
  • 21. Masonry Compressive Strength if mortar crushes and brick splits simultaneously: where U u = coefficient of non-uniformity (range 1.1 to 2.5) Hilsdorf equation
  • 22. Nonlinear Mortar Behavior triaxial test 1000 psi v l 1000 psi 30 psi
  • 23. Unit Splitting vs. Mortar Crushing Linear Mortar f’ udt unit failure envelope mortar failure envelope tension compression unit stress path mortar stress path mortar crushes failure f’ jt f’ ut
  • 24. Unit Splitting vs. Mortar Crushing Nonlinear Mortar tension compression f’ udt mortar failure envelope unit failure envelope failure unit stress path mortar stress path unit splits f’ ut f’ jt
  • 25. Incremental Lateral Tensile Stress on Masonry Unit From Atkinson and Noland “A Proposed Failure Theory for Brick Masonry in Compression ,” Proceedings, Third Canadian Masonry Symposium, Edmonton, 1983, pp. 5-1 to 5-17. Assuming linear behavior for masonry unit, and nonlinear mortar behavior:
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31. Compressive Strength of Masonry per UBC UBC Table 21-D Type M/S mortar Type N mortar 14,000 or more 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 5,300 4,700 4,000 3,350 2,700 2,000 4,400 3,800 3,300 2,750 2,200 1,600 Specified compressive strength of clay masonry, f’ m Specified Compressive Strength of Masonry, f’ m , (psi) Compressive Strength of Clay Masonry Units (psi)
  • 32. Compressive Strength of Masonry per UBC UBC Table 21-D Type N mortar 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 2,800 2,350 1,850 1,350 950 Specified compressive strength of concrete masonry, f’ m Type M/S mortar 4,800 or more 3,750 2,800 1,900 1,250 Specified Compressive Strength of Masonry, f’ m , (psi) Compressive Strength of Concrete Masonry Units (psi)
  • 33.
  • 34. Compressive Strength of Masonry per MSJC MSJC Specification Table 1 Net Area Compressive Strength of Clay Masonry Units (psi) Type M/S Mortar Type N Mortar Net Area Compressive Strength of Masonry ( psi) 1,700 3,350 4,950 6,600 8,250 9,900 13,200 2,100 4,150 6,200 8,250 10,300 - - 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 Compressive strength of clay masonry by unit strength method
  • 35. Compressive Strength of Masonry per MSJC MSJC Specification Table 2 Compressive Strength of Concrete Masonry Units (psi) Type M/S Mortar Type N Mortar Net Area Compressive Strength of Masonry (psi) 1,250 1,900 2,800 3,750 4,800 1,300 2,150 3,050 4,050 5,250 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Compressive strength of concrete masonry by unit strength method MSJC values of compressive strength from Table 1 and Table 2 are intended to be used in lieu of prism tests to estimate needed mortar types and unit strengths for a required compressive strength.
  • 36. Comparison of Default Prism Strengths UBC Table 21-D vs. MSJC Specifications Table 1 Default prism strengths are lower bounds to expected values.
  • 37. Comparison of Default Prism Strengths UBC Table 21-D vs. Table 2 MSJC-Spec. Note: MSJC and UBC values are almost identical for concrete masonry. Default prism strengths are lower bounds to expected values.
  • 39. Elastic Modulus of Masonry in Compression Basic Mechanics  t j t b P =  y A net [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
  • 40. Elastic Modulus of Masonry in Compression Basic Mechanics Reference: Structural Masonry by S. Sahlin, Section D.2 [8]  t j t b P =  y A net [12] [9] [10] [11]
  • 41. Elastic Modulus of Masonry in Compression 1.2 concrete block masonry clay-unit masonry 0.76 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2  t = 0.0498 (typical for concrete block masonry)  t = 0.152 (typical for brick masonry)
  • 42. Code Assumptions for Elastic Modulus UBC Sec. 2106.2.12 and 2106.2.13 & MSJC Sec. 1.8.2.2.1 and 1.8.2.2.2 secant method f m  m MSJC Sec. 1.8.2.1.1 for clay-unit masonry E m = 700 f’ m for concrete-unit masonry E m = 900 f’ m UBC 2106.2.13 MSJC Sec. 1.8.2.2.2 G = 0.4 E m estimate without prism test data UBC Sec. 2106.2.12.1 for clay-unit or concrete masonry E m = 750 f’ m < 3000 ksi f’ mt E m 0.33 f’ mt 0.05 f’ mt
  • 43. Strength of URM Bearing Walls
  • 44.
  • 45. Unreinforced Bearing and Shear Walls Historically walls were sized in terms of h/t ratio which was limited to 25. Empirical design of masonry UBC 2105.2 h < 35 ’ Associated BIA Technical Note: 24 series The Contemporary Bearing Wall Building wind = 15 psf h
  • 46. Concentric Axial Compression Buckling Load Euler buckling load: P =  y A net t h’ = kl for rectangular section:
  • 47. Concentric Axial Compression Note: for MSJC and UBC plot, r=0.289t is assumed h’/t 25 50 75 100  y 0.25 f’ m MSJC/UBC f’ m 24.8 Euler curve
  • 48. Code Allowable Compressive Stress 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0 50 100 150 200 for h’/r > 99 : F a = 0.25 f’ m [(70r/h’) 2 ] MSJC Eq. 2-13 and UBC Eq. 7-40 MSJC Section 2.2.3 and UBC Section 2107.3.2: for h’/r < = 99: F a = 0.25 f’ m [1 - (h’/140r) 2 ] MSJC Eq. 2-12 and UBC Eq. 7-39
  • 49. Concentric Axial Compression UBC 2106.2.4: Effective Wall Height translation restrained no sidesway restraint MSJC 2.2.3: Buckling Loads e = eccentricity of axial load rotation restrained 2.0 rotation unrestrained 2.0 h’=kh rotation restrained 0.70 h rotation unrestrained 1.0 k = h’/h
  • 50. Concentric Axial Compression UBC 2106.2.3: Effective Wall Thickness A. Single Wythe t = specified thickness t mortar or grout filled collar joint B. Multiwythe C. Cavity Walls each wythe considered separate both wythes loaded P 1 P 2 t 1 t 2 air space wire joint reinforcement P t 1 t 2 one wythe loaded
  • 51. Concentric Axial Compression Neglect web area if face-shell bedding is used. UBC 2106.2.5: Effective Wall Area Effective area is minimum area of mortar bed joints plus any grouted area. face shell effective thickness raked joint effective thickness
  • 52. Example: Concentric Axial Compression Determine the allowable vertical load capacity of the unreinforced cavity wall shown below per both the UBC and the MSJC requirements. Per NCMA TEK 14-1A for face shell bedding: A net = 30.0 in 2 I net = 308.7 in 4 r = 2.84 in. (r based only on loaded wythe) P a concrete footing 20’-0” Case “A”: Prisms have been tested. f’ m = 2500 psi for block wall f’ m = 5000 psi for brick wall Case “B”: No prisms have been tested. (Type I CMU’s and Type S mortar will be specified.) f’ m = 1500 psi for block wall metal ties face-shell bedding 7.63” 8”CMU 3.63” 4” brick
  • 53. Example: Case “A” MSJC Section 2.2.3 & UBC 2107.3.2 * no buckling check per UBC. P a = 11.9 kip / ft for both codes MSJC Section 2.2.3: check buckling *
  • 54. Example: Case “B” MSJC Section 2.2.3 & UBC 2107.3.2 MSJC Section 2.2.3: check buckling Governs for MSJC, take 1/2 for UBC since no special inspection is provided.
  • 55. Eccentric Axial Compression Ref: NCMA TEK 14-4 Eccentric Loading of Nonreinforced Concrete Masonry h P e Pe t combined axial stress plus bending f a + f b -f a + f b axial stress P bending stress M = Pe
  • 56. Eccentric Axial Compression References Associated NCMA TEK Note 31 Eccentric Loading of Nonreinforced Concrete Masonry (1971) Associated BIA Technical Note 24B Design Examples of Contemporary Bearing Walls 24E Design Tables for Columns and Walls where F a = allowable axial compressive stress (UBC 2107.3.2 or MSJC Sec. 2.2.3) F b = allowable flexural compressive stress = 0.33 f´ m (UBC 2107.3.3 or MSJC Sec 2.2.3) limiting compressive stress (controls for small e’s) UBC Section 2107.2.7 and MSJC 2.2.3: Unity Formula limiting tensile stress -f a + f b < F t where F t = allowable tensile stress (controls for large e’s) UBC 2107.3.5 or MSJC 2.2.3: Allowable Tensile Stress
  • 57. Allowable Tensile Stresses, F t MSJC Table 2.2.3.2 and UBC Table 21-I 40 25 68* 80 50 80* 30 19 58* 60 38 60* 24 15 41* 48 30 48* 15 9 26* 30 19 29* * grouted masonry is addressed only by MSJC all units are (psi) Direction of Tension and Type of Masonry Mortar Type Portland Cement/Lime or Mortar Cement Masonry Cement/Lime M or S M or S N N tension normal to bed joints solid units hollow units fully grouted units tension parallel to bed joints solid units hollow units fully grouted units
  • 58. Allowable Flexural Tensile Stresses, F t weak units flexural tension parallel to bed joints strong units No direct tensile strength assumed normal to head joints, just shear strength along bed joint. flexural tension normal to bed joints Note: direct tensile stresses across wall thickness is not allowed per UBC or MSJC.
  • 59. Example: Eccentric Axial Compression f’ m = 2000 psi (from tests) Type S mortar Determine the allowable vertical load capacity per UBC and MSJC. Per NCMA Tek 141A: (per running foot) A net = 30.0 in 2 I x = 309 in 4 S x = 81.0 in 3 r= 2.84” F t = 25 psi per UBC 2107.3.5 and MSJC Table 2.2.3.2 e = 3.0” concrete footing 20’-0” P a 7.63” 8”CMU ungrouted face-shell bedding 1.25”
  • 61. Example Compression controlling: UBC 2107.3.4 and MSJC 2.2.3
  • 62. Example MSJC Section 2.2.3: Check Buckling (no buckling check per UBC) Code UBC MSJC P a (lbs) Tension Compression Buckling 6750 6233 6750 6233 ----- 1417
  • 63. Kern Distance for URM Wall e = t/6 f a + f b e Assuming F t = 0 for solid section. -f a + f b = 0 t P = + f a f b b t/3 t b/3 kern If load is within kern, then no net tensile stress.
  • 64. Kern Distance for URM Wall Specific Tensile Strength, F t , for solid section. f a + f b e -f a + f b = F t t P = + f a f b b t kern If load is within kern, then tensile stress < F t .
  • 65. Strength of Walls with no Tensile Strength Resultant load inside of kern. f m P e P t
  • 66. Strength of Walls with no Tensile Strength Neglect all masonry in tension. Note: This approach is outside of UBC and MSJC since F t may be exceeded. Partially cracked wall is not prismatic along its height. Stability of the wall must be checked based on Euler criteria modified to account for zones of cracked masonry. Analytical derivation for this case is provided in Chapter E of Structural Masonry by S. Sahlin. Resultant load outside of kern. P e t t/2 f m P [1] [2] [3] [4]
  • 67. Example Part (a) e = 1.0 in. < t/6 = 1.27 in. within kern! Part (b) e = 2.5 in. > t/6 = 1.27 in. outside of kern! Determine the maximum compressive edge stress. e two-wythe brick wall P = 10 kip/ft. t = 7.63”
  • 69.
  • 70.
  • 71.
  • 72.
  • 74.
  • 75. Coefficients of Thermal Expansion Thermal coefficients for other structural materials can be found in BIA Technical Note 18. Concrete Masonry dense aggregate 5.2 0.62 Stone granite 4.7 0.56 fire clay brick or tile 2.5 0.30 clay or shale tile 3.3 0.40 cinder aggregate 3.1 0.37 expanded shale aggregate 4.3 0.52 expanded slag aggregate 4.6 0.55 pumice or cinder aggregate 4.1 0.49 limestone 4.4 0.53 marble 7.3 0.88 Clay Masonry clay or shale brick 3.6 0.43 Material Ave. Coefficient of Linear Thermal Expansion (x 10 -6 strain/ o F) Thermal Expansion (inches per 100’ for 100 o F temperature increase)
  • 76.
  • 77.
  • 78.
  • 79.
  • 80. Control Joint Details for Concrete Masonry Ref. NCMA TEK 10-2A Control Joints in Concrete Masonry Walls control joint unit grout fill paper raked head joint and caulk
  • 81. Expansion Joints in Clay Masonry Pressure-relieving or expansion joints accommodate expansion of clay masonry. Ref: Masonry Design and Detailing , Christine Beall, McGraw-Hill BIA Tech. Note 18A Movement - Design and Detailing of Movement Joints, Part II expansion joint
  • 82. Spacing of Expansion Joints For brick masonry: where W = total wall expansion in inches 0.0002 = coefficient of moisture expansion 0.0000043 = coefficient of thermal expansion L = length of wall in inches T max = maximum mean wall temperature, °F T min = minimum mean wall temperature, °F L )] T T ( 0000045 . 0 0002 . 0 [ W min max    min max T T ) p ( 000 , 24 S   S = maximum spacing of joints in inches p = ratio of opaque wall area to gross wall area
  • 83. Expansion Joint Details for Brick Veneer Walls 20 oz. copper silicone or butyl sealant neoprene extruded plastic
  • 84. Vertical Expansion of Veneer rc beam concrete block joint reinforcement or wire tie clay-brick veneer compressible filler flashing with weep holes steel shelf angle 1/4” to 3/8” min. clearance
  • 85. Expansion Problems In cavity walls, cracks can form at an external corner because the outside wythe experiences a larger temperature expansion than the inside wythe. sun
  • 86.
  • 87.
  • 88.
  • 89. End of Lessons 2 and 3