SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 9
Behavioral vs. Cognitive Views
               of Learning
These traditions in learning theory have existed for decades.
They give different answers to the fundamental question,
“What is learned” when learning takes place?

   Behaviorists say:              Cognitivists say:
   “Specific actions”             “Mental representations”


 For example, in a
 “Skinner Box”, a rat may
 receive a food reward
 every time he presses
 the bar. He presses
 faster and faster. What
 has he learned?
Behavioral vs. Cognitive Views
               of Learning
These traditions in learning theory have existed for decades.
They give different answers to the fundamental question,
“What is learned” when learning takes place?

   Behaviorists say:              Cognitivists say:
   “to press the bar.”            “that pressing produces food.”


 For example, in a
 “Skinner Box”, a rat may
 receive a food reward
 every time he presses
 the bar. He presses
 faster and faster. What
 has he learned?
Behavioral vs. Cognitive Views
               of Learning
                      Behaviorism
                      (“learns to”)
1. Learning involves the formation of associations between
specific actions and specific events (stimuli) in the
environment. These stimuli may either precede or follow the
action (antecedents vs. consequences).
2. Many behaviorists use intervening variables to explain
behavior (e.g., habit, drive) but avoid references to mental
states.
3. RADICAL BEHAVIORISM (operant conditioning/behavior
modification/behavior analysis): avoids any intervening
variables and focuses on descriptions of relationships
between behavior and environment (“functional analysis”).
Behavioral vs. Cognitive Views
               of Learning
                        Cognitivism
                      (“learns that”)
1. Learning takes place in the mind, not in behavior. It
involves the formation of mental representations of the
elements of a task and the discovery of how these elements
are related.
2. Behavior is used to make inferences about mental states
but is not of interest in itself (“methodological behaviorism”).

3. EXAMPLE: Tolman & Honzik’s experiment on latent
learning. Tolman, a pioneer of cognitive psychology, argued
that when rats practice mazes, they acquire a “cognitive map”
of the layout—mental representations of the landmarks and
their spatial relationships.
Response Vs. Place Learning
               (Tolman, Ritchie & Kalish, 1946)
                                                  Start 2
This maze had no walls or
roof so that rats could see
“landmarks” in the room such
as a window, door, or lamp.


On a random half of the trials,
the rats started from Start        Goal 2                   Goal 1
Box 1, and on the other half
they started from Start Box 2.


                                                  Start 1

GROUP P always found food in Goal Box 1.
GROUP R found food in Goal Box 1 when they
started from Start Box 1 but received food in
Goal Box 2 when they started from Start Box 2.
Response Vs. Place Learning
              (Tolman, Ritchie & Kalish, 1946)
                                                 Start 2
Cognitive theory predicted
that GROUP P would learn
faster because they only had
to learn one cognitive map.


Behavior theory predicted
GROUP R would learn faster        Goal 2                   Goal 1
because they only had to
learn one sequence of
movements at the choice
point—a right turn.
                                                 Start 1

GROUP P always found food in Goal Box 1.
GROUP R found food in Goal Box 1 when they
started from Start Box 1 but received food in
Goal Box 2 when they started from Start Box 2.
Response Vs. Place Learning
                  (Tolman, Ritchie & Kalish, 1946)
                                                     Start 2
    What’s YOUR prediction?
Are you a behaviorist or a cognitivist?

 GROUP                 GROUP P
 R

                                          Goal 2               Goal 1




                                                     Start 1

    GROUP P always found food in Goal Box 1.
    GROUP R found food in Goal Box 1 when they
    started from Start Box 1 but received food in
    Goal Box 2 when they started from Start Box 2.
Response Vs. Place Learning
                   (Tolman, Ritchie & Kalish, 1946)
                                                      Start 2
     What’s YOUR prediction?
 Are you a behaviorist or a cognitivist?

  GROUP                 GROUP P
  R
Group P learned
faster.
                  But                      Goal 2               Goal 1

 Later studies found that if the maze had a roof
 so the rats couldn’t see things in the room,
 response learning was faster.                        Start 1

     GROUP P always found food in Goal Box 1.
     GROUP R found food in Goal Box 1 when they
     started from Start Box 1 but received food in
     Goal Box 2 when they started from Start Box 2.
Response Vs. Place Learning
                   (Tolman, Ritchie & Kalish, 1946)
                                                      Start 2
     What’s YOUR prediction?
 Are you a behaviorist or a cognitivist?

  GROUP                 GROUP P
  R
Group P learned
faster.
                                           Goal 2               Goal 1
  Both response and place learning
  occur. Which type is faster depends
  on what cues are available. So both
  the cognitive and behavioral views
  turned out to be right!                             Start 1

     GROUP P always found food in Goal Box 1.
     GROUP R found food in Goal Box 1 when they
     started from Start Box 1 but received food in
     Goal Box 2 when they started from Start Box 2.

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

behaviorism school of thought
behaviorism school of thoughtbehaviorism school of thought
behaviorism school of thoughtAdilafarooqi
 
Observational Learning Slides
Observational Learning SlidesObservational Learning Slides
Observational Learning SlidesSam Georgi
 
psychology of learning
psychology of learningpsychology of learning
psychology of learningehab elbaz
 
Behaviorism theory of learning
Behaviorism theory of learningBehaviorism theory of learning
Behaviorism theory of learningRem Polittude
 
Information processing theory abd
Information processing theory abdInformation processing theory abd
Information processing theory abdAbdullah Mubasher
 
Cognitive learning theory
Cognitive learning theoryCognitive learning theory
Cognitive learning theoryVerbena Wilburg
 
Cognitivism theory
Cognitivism theoryCognitivism theory
Cognitivism theoryTiffy374
 
Social Cognitive Theory
Social Cognitive Theory Social Cognitive Theory
Social Cognitive Theory mhonjo1
 
Classical conditioning
Classical conditioningClassical conditioning
Classical conditioningAachal Taywade
 
Behaviorism and education
Behaviorism and education Behaviorism and education
Behaviorism and education swatka94
 
Thorndike Learning Theory
Thorndike Learning Theory Thorndike Learning Theory
Thorndike Learning Theory HennaAnsari
 
Albert bandura and social learning theory
Albert bandura and social learning theoryAlbert bandura and social learning theory
Albert bandura and social learning theoryAmal Jith
 
Humanistic Psychology
Humanistic PsychologyHumanistic Psychology
Humanistic PsychologyCaroline Lace
 

Mais procurados (20)

behaviorism school of thought
behaviorism school of thoughtbehaviorism school of thought
behaviorism school of thought
 
Observational Learning Slides
Observational Learning SlidesObservational Learning Slides
Observational Learning Slides
 
psychology of learning
psychology of learningpsychology of learning
psychology of learning
 
Behaviorism
BehaviorismBehaviorism
Behaviorism
 
Behaviorism theory of learning
Behaviorism theory of learningBehaviorism theory of learning
Behaviorism theory of learning
 
Behaviourism
BehaviourismBehaviourism
Behaviourism
 
Information processing theory abd
Information processing theory abdInformation processing theory abd
Information processing theory abd
 
Cognitive learning theory
Cognitive learning theoryCognitive learning theory
Cognitive learning theory
 
Cognitivism theory
Cognitivism theoryCognitivism theory
Cognitivism theory
 
Behaviorism
BehaviorismBehaviorism
Behaviorism
 
Social Cognitive Theory
Social Cognitive Theory Social Cognitive Theory
Social Cognitive Theory
 
Classical conditioning
Classical conditioningClassical conditioning
Classical conditioning
 
Behaviorism and education
Behaviorism and education Behaviorism and education
Behaviorism and education
 
Cognitive learning
Cognitive learning Cognitive learning
Cognitive learning
 
Operant conditiong
Operant conditiong Operant conditiong
Operant conditiong
 
Behaviorism
BehaviorismBehaviorism
Behaviorism
 
Thorndike Learning Theory
Thorndike Learning Theory Thorndike Learning Theory
Thorndike Learning Theory
 
Theories of Learning
Theories of LearningTheories of Learning
Theories of Learning
 
Albert bandura and social learning theory
Albert bandura and social learning theoryAlbert bandura and social learning theory
Albert bandura and social learning theory
 
Humanistic Psychology
Humanistic PsychologyHumanistic Psychology
Humanistic Psychology
 

Semelhante a Behavioral vs. cognitive views of learning

Semelhante a Behavioral vs. cognitive views of learning (20)

Learnind theory and its implications in psychiatry
Learnind theory and its implications in psychiatryLearnind theory and its implications in psychiatry
Learnind theory and its implications in psychiatry
 
Tolman theory
Tolman theoryTolman theory
Tolman theory
 
language acquisition THEORIES
language acquisition THEORIESlanguage acquisition THEORIES
language acquisition THEORIES
 
IB Psychology SL Study Guide
IB Psychology SL Study GuideIB Psychology SL Study Guide
IB Psychology SL Study Guide
 
IB Psychology SL Study Guide
IB Psychology SL Study GuideIB Psychology SL Study Guide
IB Psychology SL Study Guide
 
types of Learning
types of Learningtypes of Learning
types of Learning
 
What is language acquisition
What is language acquisitionWhat is language acquisition
What is language acquisition
 
Theory of learning
Theory of learning Theory of learning
Theory of learning
 
Behaviorist Theory by Pavlov and Skinner.pptx
Behaviorist Theory by Pavlov and Skinner.pptxBehaviorist Theory by Pavlov and Skinner.pptx
Behaviorist Theory by Pavlov and Skinner.pptx
 
Behavioral science report
Behavioral science reportBehavioral science report
Behavioral science report
 
Various views on Human Learning - All 5 Theories Merged.pdf
Various views on Human Learning - All 5 Theories Merged.pdfVarious views on Human Learning - All 5 Theories Merged.pdf
Various views on Human Learning - All 5 Theories Merged.pdf
 
Animal behavior
Animal behaviorAnimal behavior
Animal behavior
 
Neobehaviourism
NeobehaviourismNeobehaviourism
Neobehaviourism
 
Animal Behavior
Animal BehaviorAnimal Behavior
Animal Behavior
 
UNITS TWO APPROACES 1 BEHAVIOURISM (1) [Autosaved].pptx
UNITS TWO APPROACES 1 BEHAVIOURISM (1) [Autosaved].pptxUNITS TWO APPROACES 1 BEHAVIOURISM (1) [Autosaved].pptx
UNITS TWO APPROACES 1 BEHAVIOURISM (1) [Autosaved].pptx
 
Learned Behaviors.ppt
Learned Behaviors.pptLearned Behaviors.ppt
Learned Behaviors.ppt
 
Learned Behaviors.ppt
Learned Behaviors.pptLearned Behaviors.ppt
Learned Behaviors.ppt
 
Types of learning behavier
Types of learning behavierTypes of learning behavier
Types of learning behavier
 
Science.theory
Science.theoryScience.theory
Science.theory
 
Cognitive and learning
Cognitive and learningCognitive and learning
Cognitive and learning
 

Mais de Tarun Gehlot

Materials 11-01228
Materials 11-01228Materials 11-01228
Materials 11-01228Tarun Gehlot
 
Continuity and end_behavior
Continuity and  end_behaviorContinuity and  end_behavior
Continuity and end_behaviorTarun Gehlot
 
Continuity of functions by graph (exercises with detailed solutions)
Continuity of functions by graph   (exercises with detailed solutions)Continuity of functions by graph   (exercises with detailed solutions)
Continuity of functions by graph (exercises with detailed solutions)Tarun Gehlot
 
Factoring by the trial and-error method
Factoring by the trial and-error methodFactoring by the trial and-error method
Factoring by the trial and-error methodTarun Gehlot
 
Introduction to finite element analysis
Introduction to finite element analysisIntroduction to finite element analysis
Introduction to finite element analysisTarun Gehlot
 
Finite elements : basis functions
Finite elements : basis functionsFinite elements : basis functions
Finite elements : basis functionsTarun Gehlot
 
Finite elements for 2‐d problems
Finite elements  for 2‐d problemsFinite elements  for 2‐d problems
Finite elements for 2‐d problemsTarun Gehlot
 
Error analysis statistics
Error analysis   statisticsError analysis   statistics
Error analysis statisticsTarun Gehlot
 
Introduction to matlab
Introduction to matlabIntroduction to matlab
Introduction to matlabTarun Gehlot
 
Linear approximations and_differentials
Linear approximations and_differentialsLinear approximations and_differentials
Linear approximations and_differentialsTarun Gehlot
 
Local linear approximation
Local linear approximationLocal linear approximation
Local linear approximationTarun Gehlot
 
Interpolation functions
Interpolation functionsInterpolation functions
Interpolation functionsTarun Gehlot
 
Propeties of-triangles
Propeties of-trianglesPropeties of-triangles
Propeties of-trianglesTarun Gehlot
 
Gaussian quadratures
Gaussian quadraturesGaussian quadratures
Gaussian quadraturesTarun Gehlot
 
Basics of set theory
Basics of set theoryBasics of set theory
Basics of set theoryTarun Gehlot
 
Numerical integration
Numerical integrationNumerical integration
Numerical integrationTarun Gehlot
 
Applications of set theory
Applications of  set theoryApplications of  set theory
Applications of set theoryTarun Gehlot
 
Miscellneous functions
Miscellneous  functionsMiscellneous  functions
Miscellneous functionsTarun Gehlot
 

Mais de Tarun Gehlot (20)

Materials 11-01228
Materials 11-01228Materials 11-01228
Materials 11-01228
 
Binary relations
Binary relationsBinary relations
Binary relations
 
Continuity and end_behavior
Continuity and  end_behaviorContinuity and  end_behavior
Continuity and end_behavior
 
Continuity of functions by graph (exercises with detailed solutions)
Continuity of functions by graph   (exercises with detailed solutions)Continuity of functions by graph   (exercises with detailed solutions)
Continuity of functions by graph (exercises with detailed solutions)
 
Factoring by the trial and-error method
Factoring by the trial and-error methodFactoring by the trial and-error method
Factoring by the trial and-error method
 
Introduction to finite element analysis
Introduction to finite element analysisIntroduction to finite element analysis
Introduction to finite element analysis
 
Finite elements : basis functions
Finite elements : basis functionsFinite elements : basis functions
Finite elements : basis functions
 
Finite elements for 2‐d problems
Finite elements  for 2‐d problemsFinite elements  for 2‐d problems
Finite elements for 2‐d problems
 
Error analysis statistics
Error analysis   statisticsError analysis   statistics
Error analysis statistics
 
Matlab commands
Matlab commandsMatlab commands
Matlab commands
 
Introduction to matlab
Introduction to matlabIntroduction to matlab
Introduction to matlab
 
Linear approximations and_differentials
Linear approximations and_differentialsLinear approximations and_differentials
Linear approximations and_differentials
 
Local linear approximation
Local linear approximationLocal linear approximation
Local linear approximation
 
Interpolation functions
Interpolation functionsInterpolation functions
Interpolation functions
 
Propeties of-triangles
Propeties of-trianglesPropeties of-triangles
Propeties of-triangles
 
Gaussian quadratures
Gaussian quadraturesGaussian quadratures
Gaussian quadratures
 
Basics of set theory
Basics of set theoryBasics of set theory
Basics of set theory
 
Numerical integration
Numerical integrationNumerical integration
Numerical integration
 
Applications of set theory
Applications of  set theoryApplications of  set theory
Applications of set theory
 
Miscellneous functions
Miscellneous  functionsMiscellneous  functions
Miscellneous functions
 

Behavioral vs. cognitive views of learning

  • 1. Behavioral vs. Cognitive Views of Learning These traditions in learning theory have existed for decades. They give different answers to the fundamental question, “What is learned” when learning takes place? Behaviorists say: Cognitivists say: “Specific actions” “Mental representations” For example, in a “Skinner Box”, a rat may receive a food reward every time he presses the bar. He presses faster and faster. What has he learned?
  • 2. Behavioral vs. Cognitive Views of Learning These traditions in learning theory have existed for decades. They give different answers to the fundamental question, “What is learned” when learning takes place? Behaviorists say: Cognitivists say: “to press the bar.” “that pressing produces food.” For example, in a “Skinner Box”, a rat may receive a food reward every time he presses the bar. He presses faster and faster. What has he learned?
  • 3. Behavioral vs. Cognitive Views of Learning Behaviorism (“learns to”) 1. Learning involves the formation of associations between specific actions and specific events (stimuli) in the environment. These stimuli may either precede or follow the action (antecedents vs. consequences). 2. Many behaviorists use intervening variables to explain behavior (e.g., habit, drive) but avoid references to mental states. 3. RADICAL BEHAVIORISM (operant conditioning/behavior modification/behavior analysis): avoids any intervening variables and focuses on descriptions of relationships between behavior and environment (“functional analysis”).
  • 4. Behavioral vs. Cognitive Views of Learning Cognitivism (“learns that”) 1. Learning takes place in the mind, not in behavior. It involves the formation of mental representations of the elements of a task and the discovery of how these elements are related. 2. Behavior is used to make inferences about mental states but is not of interest in itself (“methodological behaviorism”). 3. EXAMPLE: Tolman & Honzik’s experiment on latent learning. Tolman, a pioneer of cognitive psychology, argued that when rats practice mazes, they acquire a “cognitive map” of the layout—mental representations of the landmarks and their spatial relationships.
  • 5. Response Vs. Place Learning (Tolman, Ritchie & Kalish, 1946) Start 2 This maze had no walls or roof so that rats could see “landmarks” in the room such as a window, door, or lamp. On a random half of the trials, the rats started from Start Goal 2 Goal 1 Box 1, and on the other half they started from Start Box 2. Start 1 GROUP P always found food in Goal Box 1. GROUP R found food in Goal Box 1 when they started from Start Box 1 but received food in Goal Box 2 when they started from Start Box 2.
  • 6. Response Vs. Place Learning (Tolman, Ritchie & Kalish, 1946) Start 2 Cognitive theory predicted that GROUP P would learn faster because they only had to learn one cognitive map. Behavior theory predicted GROUP R would learn faster Goal 2 Goal 1 because they only had to learn one sequence of movements at the choice point—a right turn. Start 1 GROUP P always found food in Goal Box 1. GROUP R found food in Goal Box 1 when they started from Start Box 1 but received food in Goal Box 2 when they started from Start Box 2.
  • 7. Response Vs. Place Learning (Tolman, Ritchie & Kalish, 1946) Start 2 What’s YOUR prediction? Are you a behaviorist or a cognitivist? GROUP GROUP P R Goal 2 Goal 1 Start 1 GROUP P always found food in Goal Box 1. GROUP R found food in Goal Box 1 when they started from Start Box 1 but received food in Goal Box 2 when they started from Start Box 2.
  • 8. Response Vs. Place Learning (Tolman, Ritchie & Kalish, 1946) Start 2 What’s YOUR prediction? Are you a behaviorist or a cognitivist? GROUP GROUP P R Group P learned faster. But Goal 2 Goal 1 Later studies found that if the maze had a roof so the rats couldn’t see things in the room, response learning was faster. Start 1 GROUP P always found food in Goal Box 1. GROUP R found food in Goal Box 1 when they started from Start Box 1 but received food in Goal Box 2 when they started from Start Box 2.
  • 9. Response Vs. Place Learning (Tolman, Ritchie & Kalish, 1946) Start 2 What’s YOUR prediction? Are you a behaviorist or a cognitivist? GROUP GROUP P R Group P learned faster. Goal 2 Goal 1 Both response and place learning occur. Which type is faster depends on what cues are available. So both the cognitive and behavioral views turned out to be right! Start 1 GROUP P always found food in Goal Box 1. GROUP R found food in Goal Box 1 when they started from Start Box 1 but received food in Goal Box 2 when they started from Start Box 2.