Effective Use of Knowledge Management Suing the Digital Curation Framework.

1. Effective Use of Knowledge
Management Using the
Digital Curation Framework
Lilly Conference, Miami,
OH, November 18, 2016
Mark E. Deschaine & Sue Ann Sharma
desch1me@cmich.edu sa3sharm@oakland.edu

2. Today’s Takeaway
Today’s session will provide you with a practical
perspective on the ways to utilize the Five Cs
Digital Curation Framework to assist in
developing effective and efficient knowledge
management utilizing the use of Web 2.0 tools.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/15rmGaI2pFRhpZ49eO-Ctys-bFVuOUutn9065TuTztdE/edit#

3. What is Digital Curation?
"The intentional process of mindfully mining,
organizing, and archiving digital resources”
(Deschaine & Sharma, 2015)

4. The Five Cs of Digital Curation
(Deschaine & Sharma, 2015; Sharma & Deschaine, 2016)

5. Finding Your Ground Zero
What are some of the successes and barriers to
using digital curation to for knowledge
management?

6. Cost Versus Capabilities
Retrieved from http://www.go-rbcs.com/articles/tech-growth-curves

7. Megabytes, Gigabytes and Terabytes
Retrieved from http://qz.com/738365/the-last-vcr-will-be-manufactured-this-month/ and
http://theconversation.com/turning-diamonds-defects-into-long-term-3-d-data-storage-67685

8. Are You on Woo Woo?
Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sr_EtMhM3fg

9. Curation Tools
1. Explore with the Five Cs framework.
using this categorized tool collection.
2. Select 1 -2 tools and critique the tool
for its benefits and scalability features.
3. Consider how might using these tools
help you to conceptualize knowledge
management?
4. How can you circulate this information
with your colleagues or students to
further enhance knowledge
management within your field of
expertise?

10. Curation Cautions
● Intellectual property
● Copyright
● Privacy issues
● Time
● Speed of transition to alternative media
● Over-focus on tool function versus content
design
● Inconsistency of Infrastructure

11. Curation Benefits
● Can be in incremental step
● Allow co-creation of instructional materials with
students
● Amplifies both teacher and student voice
● Extends instructional opportunities
● Cost effective alternatives to commercial products
● Encourages interdisciplinary collaboration and
discussion

12. Closing Thoughts
The Same Ax Twice: Slowly replacing individual
elements to benefit the functionality of the
original.
New house, same old parquet: Web 2.0 tools will
increase teaching proficiency.
Adapted from Mansfield, H. (2000).The Same Ax Twice:
Restoration and Renewal in a Throwaway Age. Hanover: University Press of New England.

13. Selected Articles
Sharma, S. A. & Deschaine, M. E. (2016). Digital curation: A framework to enhance adolescent and adult
literacy initiatives. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 60(1), 71-78.
Deschaine, M. E. & Sharma, S. A. (2015). The 5 Cs of digital curation: Supporting 21st century teaching
and learning. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10, 19-24.

14. Selected Resources
Baker, E. A. (Ed.). (2010). The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice. New
York, NY: Guilford.
Deschaine, M. E. & Sharma, S. A. (2015). The 5 Cs of digital curation: Supporting 21st century
teaching and learning. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10, 19-24.
Tracey, R. (2015, June 17). A framework for content curation [Web log post]. Retrieved from
https://ryan2point0.wordpress.com/2015/06/17/aframework-for-content-curation
Ranker, J. (2015). The affordances of blogs and digital video: New potentials for exploring topics
and representing meaning. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(7), 568–578.
Sharma, S. A. & Deschaine, M. E. (2016). Digital curation: A framework to enhance adolescent and
adult literacy initiatives. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 60(1), 71-78.

15. Thank You!
Mark E. Deschaine, PhD
desch1me@cmich.edu
Sue Ann Sharma, PhD
sa3sharm@oakland.edu