7. MONALISA
Develops Motorways of the Sea
Deploys innovative e-Navigation solutions
Delivers as part of the EU`s Baltic Sea Strategy
8. MONALISA – Some Basic Facts
- Budget: 22.4 M€
- EU grant from TEN-T: 11.2 M€
- Implementation period: Sept. 2010 - Dec. 2013
- Lead Partner: Swedish Maritime Administration
9. Background of the Project
• Cooperation in the Baltic Sea for the development of
Motorways of the Sea
• Environmental aspects of maritime transport – Green
Corridors are considered
• EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
• HELCOM Moscow Minsterial Declaration (May 2010)
• Consortium established with partners from public
authorities, private sector and academic organisations
10. MONALISA´s contribution to EU´s BSR Strategy
EU´s Strategy for the Baltic Sea
Prio-area 4 To become a model
region for clean shipping
MONALISA
- Less emissions through optimisation
of shipping routes and speed
schedules.
Prio-area 11 To improve internal and
external transport links
- Development of the Motorways of
the Sea concept
- Contributing to Green Corridors
Prio-area 13 To become a leading
region in Maritime
safety and security
- Development of concrete
e-navigation services
- Re-surveying of HELCOM fairways
11. Scope of the MONALISA-project
Wider
Benefit
Motorways
of the Sea
Project
MONALISA
13. Activity 1
Dynamic & Proactive routeplanning
Subactivities
1. Preparation and Process planning
2. Routes
3. Technical solutions
4. Surveillance and security
5. Ports
6. Legal Matters
7. FSA
8. Human factors
9. Test & evaluations
10.Dissemination
14. Dynamic & Proactive Route planning
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Optimize routes
Exchange routes/Voyageplans
Monitor and provide assistance
Decision support for anticollision
Effective surveillance
Reduced costs
Reduced emissions
Big Data Analysis
15. Construction of routes
or Voyageplans
Information
Needs
Constraints
Weather
Berth available
Earliest possible ETA UKC and Airdraft
Economic route
Landmasses
Pilot available
MSI
Good weather
Cargo & Charterers
TSS Areas
No-Go Areas
20. MONALISA Bridge Console
- Sea trial configuration
Saab SeaWatch ECS
With MONALISA module
GPS antenna for AIS
Saab R5 SUPREME
Control & Display unit
(AIS Mode/TBD Mode)
VHF antenna for AIS/TBD
GPS/Beacon
antenna for DGPS
Saab R5 SUPREME
Control & Display unit
(DGPS Mode)
Option
Card Readers
(WATCH KEEPER 1,2)
VSAT communication with Saab CoastWatch VTMIS with MONALISA module (STCC)
23. Legal & Economic Matters
The way forward
on micro level
Voluntary basis and regional
implementation by Port State
recommendations/law and
reductions of port and/or
fairway fees and insurance etc.
27. Dissemination
4 Films produced
1 brochure
34 conferences
• e-Nav underway conf.
Copenhagen-Oslo
• IALA in Paris
• CMMA congress in Melbourne, Australia
• e-Nav seminar at Helcom, Helsinki
• ITS conference in Stockholm
• Nav 59 London
• Korean e-Navigation conference
• Seattle e-Navigation conference
31. Background
• Poor or no control of Pilot
exemption certificate
• Fatigue at sea, how to minimize
risk of fatigue?
• How reduce the increasing
administrative burden on board
and at the same time create
means for inspection of other
certificates and reduce risk of
forgeries?
32. Work done
Sub act 1,Background and Concept
• Action research with maritime stakeholders to evaluate the attitude towards a new
system
• A number of exam papers presented on subjects such as;
- Inspection of working hours
- Inspection of certificates in the Baltic area
• A comprehensive study on false certification and inspection in Europe
• Workshops and interviews with stakeholders.
33. Work done
Sub act 2, Human factors & Legal/Liability issues
• Action research with maritime stakeholders to evaluate the attitude towards a new
system
• A number of exam papers presented on subjects such as;
- Automatic registration of work hours at sea
- Maritime regulations on hours of work
- Issuing of certification in the Baltic area
• Workshops and interviews with stakeholders.
• Legal study conducted.
34. Work done
Sub act 3, Development and design of hardware/software
• Hardware for testing proposes developed
• Software for testing proposes developed
• Usability and portrayal work still do be undertaken.
35. Work done
Sub act 4, Testing and Dissemination
• Technical solution tested with different kind of carriers such as AIS, 3G, VSAT and
Iridium
• Simulations completed in Q3 2013
• Full scale tests completed in May 2013
• Presentations held at numerous conferences
• Films and brochures produced
36. Results & Conclusions
• Seafarers participating in the different tasks mainly positive towards a MONALISA
like system.
- Could be a “Quality stamp” for “good” flag states.
- May ease administrative burden for on board personnel
- Will provide tools to identify problems related to working hours.
• “Big brother” effect smaller than anticipated.
• Low cost on board and on shore hardware based on existing technology if
certificate databases ashore exists and are available.
However…
- Could backfire if not implemented in larger areas at the same time.
- Must incorporate some sort of “grey scale” to allow minor deficiencies.
37. Next step?
• Results will be handed over to Swedish Maritime Administration and European
Maritime Safety Agency and is a feasible solution to the original problem with poor
control of Pilot Exemption Certificates.
• Further studies are needed to look into limitations and possible dangers with such
a system.
• How do we guarantee quality at the certifying organization? And how do we
prevent “sales” at less serious certifying bodies and flag states?
41. Ensuring the Quality of Hydrographic Data
Subactivity 3.1: speed up re-surveys
Freedom of the ocean is also visible in the Baltic Sea. The coastal countries have
realized this and both the Baltic Sea Hydrographic Commission (BSHC) and the
HELCOM ministerial meetings have addressed this with a need to re-survey the
shipping routes with todays up-to-date
hydrographic survey methods to obtain
full coverage bathymetric data.
• action over the past 10 years;
• based on the shipping routes
and AIS records;
• Roadmap to compete the work;
• Chemical transport in the Gulf of
Finland about 200 M tons annual;
HELCOM AIS track: 15 days in August 2013
42. Ensuring the Quality of Hydrographic Data
Subactivity 3.1: speed up re-surveys
Re-surveys of HELCOM I and II
shipping routes and areas have
covered about 34 000 km² within
Motorways of the Baltic Sea and
MonaLisa TEN-T programs.
~65% - open for public tendering;
~20% - SGEI service order;
~15% - public administration work;
Over M€18 is used during TEN-T;
43. Ensuring the Quality of Hydrographic Data
Subactivity 3.1: re-survey impact
Contribution to safety of navigation:
Full coverage depth information -> adequate water depth
Up to date charts and ENCs
VTS, Notices to Mariners
Excellent record on
avoiding groundings
Environmentally friendly
shipping
Base data for all activities
Ice breaker routing
SMA: Multibeam surveying
44. Ensuring the Quality of Hydrographic Data
Subactivity 3.1: re-survey roadmap
There is a recognized need to continue HELCOM CAT I & II route surveys
during 2014-2020. BSHC has developed a roadmap with time schedules for
completing CAT I and II re-surveys. HELCOM Ministerial Meeting 2013 has
adopted that.
www.bshc.pro/index.php/services/gis-resurvey
45. Ensuring the Quality of Hydrographic Data
Subactivity 3.2: Development of Baltic Sea
Depth Model
a Baltic Sea Depth Model has been
created, to serve the needs of
science and researchers.
This model is built on each national
Hydrographic Office provided best
bathymetric data and it follows the
INSPIRE directive on available
public data.
The model is available at the
BSHC web-site
data.bshc.pro
and also displayed at the stand in
the exhibition.
46. Ensuring the Quality of Hydrographic Data
Subactivity 3.2: Development of Baltic Sea
Depth Model
A sample of dense data model (~4m x 4m)
47. Ensuring the Quality of Hydrographic Data
Subactivity 3.3: pilot implementation of
harmonized vertical reference
All Baltic Sea coastal countries, except Russia are now committed to a
transition into a harmonized chart datum – transition period is years. Each
country has it’s own and possibly a different path to common Chart Datum.
BOOS
48. Ensuring the Quality of Hydrographic Data
Subactivity 3.3: pilot implementation of
harmonized vertical reference
answers to
questionnaire
Roadmap
Administrative
decisions
matter is
complicated
BSHC working
group to assist
Country
EVRS = national datum
Chart Datum = EVRS
Denmark
No, but the difference is
negligible
All charts are based on
national datum≈EVRS
Germany
Own national datum for
land and hydrographic
surveys
Depths for cartography will
be given in EVRS. Charts are
not EVRS now, when?
Poland
No plans for EVRS
??
Lithuania
Will be in the nearest
future
No exact schedules
Latvia
Will be during 2013
Within 5-6 years
Estonia
Will be during 2013-14
Soon after 2014
Finland
Yes, since 2008
Plans are open
Sweden
Yes, since
Decision: before 2020
Russia
49. Coming up 2014 ->
• Cooperation within the Baltic Sea Hydrographic Commission
• Roadmap to complete the work, and to include more Baltic
Sea coastal countries;
• Guidance and assistance
from senior experts;
• Possibly innovative and
new systems;
52. Activity 4: Global Sharing Of Maritime Data
Goal:
The activity aims to develop a functional demonstrator system both
technically and procedurally.
Defined, with the final objective to extend the sharing of maritime
information to a global scale as well as expanding the scope of maritime
information shared between maritime authorities in accordance with their
needs.
=> Demonstrator for Global Sharing Of Maritime Data
54. Activity 4: Global Sharing Of Maritime Data
Maritime Cloud
Service
Provider
Service
Provider
Authority
VTS, MRCC, Port…
55. Activity 4: Global Sharing Of Maritime Data
Broadcasts
Listens
VTS, MRCC, Port…
Listen – or Geocast
56. Maritime Cloud, Service Broker
Service Broker (Danish Maritime Authority)
Provides the relevant information for the entities, e.g. weather, routes etc.
Born in the Mona Lisa 1 project
Demonstrator for parts of the service broker in the Maritime Cloud running at
DMA
Field tests performed by DMA on ships
Continue in the Mona Lisa 2 project.
57. Maritime Cloud, Security Broker
Security Broker
Complete product
• Design completed
• Implementation completed
• Test and integration
Deployed or in test at:
• Coast Guards
• Maritime Authorities
• SAT AIS operator
Available as Open Source Software on github.org
GateHouse
58. … and here comes the new and final movie from
the MONALISA project
Film: ProjectPlace – 06_Communications/Films:
MONALISA_final_movie
59. Agenda
1000-1015 Agenda & objectives
1015-1030 Key Note: Capt. José Anselmo, DG MOVE
1030-1230 Presentation of MONALISA (1) results
1200-1230 RoundTable , Q&As
1400-1420
1420-1550
1550-1605
1605-1620
1620-1635
1635-1650
1650-1700
1700-1900
1900
MONALISA 2.0 – introduction
Presentation of ML 2.0 Activities (& Coffee)
Key Note: Axel Wenblad, WWF
Key Note: Jacob Terling, DG MOVE
Key Note: Fiona McFadden, SESAR
Key Note: Prof Valente de Oliveira, DG MOVE
Summary
Mingle & exhibitions & cocktail
Dinner
60. Agenda
1000-1015 Agenda & objectives
1015-1030 Key Note: Capt. José Anselmo, DG MOVE
1030-1230 Presentation of MONALISA (1) results
1230-1400 LUNCH
1400-1420
1420-1550
1550-1605
1605-1620
1620-1635
1635-1650
1650-1700
1700-1900
1900
MONALISA 2.0 – introduction
Presentation of ML 2.0 Activities (& Coffee)
Key Note: Axel Wenblad, WWF
Key Note: Jacob Terling, DG MOVE
Key Note: Fiona McFadden, SESAR
Key Note: Prof Valente de Oliveira, DG MOVE
Summary
Mingle & exhibitions & cocktail
Dinner