論文閱讀報告更新內容

論文閱讀報告 (更新內容)
指導教授: 李元德教授
學生: 陳竹正
學號: R78162033
班級: 經營管理研究所博士班一年級

主論文－What Theory is Not,
Theorizing Is

Mapping(USPTO) Patent Data using
Overlays to Google Maps
 重點:
將“專利資料”統計重疊呈現於Google地圖之上。
 心得:
 從WOS-SSCI下載的資料，通訊作者部份有包含國
家，可將其統計重疊呈現於Google地圖之上。
 可利用個人所指導的畢業專題-高效能高節能手機
定位系統之程式碼改寫。(畫面如後)
 關鍵在: 需要所有資料的座標，而下載下來的大量
資料只有國家或城市名。
 或利用老師提供文章中所提:SCI2 TOOL:
https://sci2.cns.iu.edu/user/index.php (畫面如後)

畢業專題-高效能高節能手機定位系
統-畫面圖1

老師提供文章中所提:SCI2 TOOL

THEORY BUILDING FROM CASES:
OPPORTUNITIES AND
CHALLENGES
 第一段最後一行為此文之重心:
…, we focus on the related research strategy
of theory building from cases, particularly
multiple cases.

THEORY BUILDING FROM CASES:
OPPORTUNITIES AND

CHALLENGES
Conclusion: 結論之重點
 Theory building from case studies is an increasingly popular
and relevant research strategy……
 Challenge: research relying on rich qualitative data is
becoming more common.
 Mitigate(減輕）through precise language and thoughtful
research design: (此部份為作者提出之方法)
 Careful justification of theory building
 Theoretical sampling of cases
 Interviews that limit informant bias
 Rich presentation of evidence in tables and appendixes
 Clear statement of theoretical arguments
 The result is fresh theory that bridges well from rich
qualitative evidence to mainstream deductive research.

BETTER STORIES AND BETTER
CONSTRUCTS: THE CASE FOR RIGOR(精密
的） AND COMPARATIVE LOGIC
 1991 stanford University

 第一段：

I focused on multiple cases and how to
develop theory from them, but I paid scant
attention to the important role of single-
case research. -> redressing that imbalance
 作者此文重視“single-case research”的重要

BETTER STORIES AND BETTER
CONSTRUCTS: THE CASE FOR RIGOR AND
COMPARATIVE LOGIC
此篇文章之整體架構
 第一段

 ARE SINGLE-CASE STUDIES SUPERIOR?

 ARE THE CLASSIC STUDIES LOOSE SINGLE

CASES?
 IS “BETTER STORIES VERSUS BETTER

CONSTRUCTS” A FALSE DICHOTOMY?
錯誤的二分法－＞呼應題目
 CONCLUSION

BETTER STORIES AND BETTER CONSTRUCTS:
THE CASE FOR RIGOR AND COMPARATIVE
LOGIC
閱讀心得重點:
 … good story telling is an essential first step,

but good theory is fundamentally the result
of rigorous (精密的、正確的）methodology
and comparative, multiple-case logic.
 This is as evident in the classic case studies

as it is in contemporary multiple-case
research.

Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, to
Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to
Eisenhardt
 1991 Brigham Young University

 1989 Eisenhardt presented an approach to

building theory using case studies, which
summarized a hybrid form of case
research……
相關資料：
http://www.getcited.org/pub/103368440
 Rejoinder:答辯,回答,應答; 還嘴,頂嘴

此篇文章應為上一篇之回應文。

Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, to
Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to
Eisenhardt
 第一段第四行：第一段重點
For us this approach is paradoxical because
although its purported purpose is theory
generation, it includes many of the
attributes of hypothesis-testing research.
->如老師註解：testing != building /
creation
->rejoinder

Better Stories, Not Better Constructs,
to Generate Better Theory: A
Rejoinder to Eisenhardt
此篇文章整體架構
 第一段

 Case(s) Versus Case Study research

 Deep Case Studies Versus Surface Case

Studies
 Telling Good Stories Versus Creating Good

Constructs
 Summary Comments

Better Stories, Not Better Constructs,
to Generate Better Theory: A
Rejoinder to Eisenhardt
 Summary Comments (結論重點)
 …Our goal has not been to discourage such
efforts but rather to point out what researchers
miss if they overlook the advantages of the
classic case study.
 …we hope that many scholars will continue to
try to tell good stories that have theoretical
import.(兩者兼顧)

Building Theories from Case Study
Research
 文章重點:
 This paper describes the process of inducting theory using case
studies – from (specifying the research questions) to (reaching
closure). 此句寫在摘要
 The purpose of this article is to (describe the process of theory
building from case studies). 此句寫在結論
 Process:
 Similar to hypothesis-testing research: problem definition and
construct validation
 Unique to the inductive, case-oriented process: within-case analysis
and replication logic
 摘要結論:
…(the tests of good theory) and (convincing grounding in the
evidence) are the key criteria for evaluating this type of research.

Research
 文章架構
 Abstract
 Background
 The Case Study Approach
 Building Theory from Case Study Research
 Getting Started
 Selecting Cases
 Crafting Instruments and Protocols
 Entering the Field
 Analyzing Within-Case Data
 Searching for Cross-Case Patterns
 Shaping Hypotheses
 Enfolding Literature
 Reaching Closure
 Comparison with Other Literature
 Discussion
 Strengths of Theory Building from Cases
 Weaknesses of Theory Building from Cases
 Applicability
 Evaluation
 Conclusions

Research
 結論重點
 首先強調表格一的重要，表格一為:
Process of Building Theory from Case Study Research:
從個案研究建立理論的程序
Getting Started->Selecting Cases->Crafting Instruments and
Protocols->Entering the Field->Analyzing Data->Shaping
Hypotheses->Enfolding Literature->Reaching Closure
 最後強調:
the accumulation of knowledge involves a
continual cycling between theory and data.
知識的累積包含理論和資料的持續循環

MAKING FAST STRATEGIC
DECISIONS IN HIGH-VELOCITY
ENVIRONMENTS
 本文重點:
 This inductive study of eight microcomputer
firms led to propositions exploring that
question. -> How do executive teams make
rapid decisions in the high-velocity
microcomputer industry?(此部份寫在摘要)
 This work is park of a larger research
program on strategic decision making in high-
velocity environments.(此部份寫在結論)

ENVIRONMENTS
 重點內容:A Model of Strategic Decision Speed in High-
Velocity Environments

ENVIRONMENTS
 結論重點:
 The results link fast decisions to several factors,
including 1(the use of real-time information),
2(multiple alternatives), 3(counselors), 4(consensus

with qualification), and 5(decision integration).
 The microcomputer industry is admittedly an
extreme situation….
->..if the ideas presented here survive empirical
tests, they offer lessons for all organizations as
they face an increasingly turbulent world.

論文閱讀報告更新內容

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a 論文閱讀報告更新內容

Semelhante a 論文閱讀報告更新內容 (20)