Ms Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. - A Milesto...
03112014 ssp webinar_printondemand_troyots
1. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC
WEBINAR
Print on Demand (POD)
Society of Scholarly Publishing
Troy Ots
Director, Production Systems
SAGE Publications
March 11, 2014
2. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC
Print on Demand vs. Traditional Inventory
POD made perfect sense when we thought journals
print subs were on their way out
Does it still make sense?
3. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC
Traditional journals inventory
● Inexpensive to overprint
● For us, warehouse space is fairly inexpensive
● Copies on hand
● Flexibility and control over inventory
● Reasonably easy to manage
Why it works
4. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC
What is the cost of POD?
Printing extras = less than $1.00/copy
Printing POD = more than $4.00/copy
At 4 times the cost, why bother
with a POD model?
● Free up warehouse space
• Warehouse space costs money
● Eliminate shipping costs
• Copies mail directly from the printer
● Reduce waste
• Waste reduces or even eliminates savings
● Possibly more control
Quantity
Unit Cost
5. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC
So, what did we do?
6. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC
We moved…
from this to this
SAGE Printer
7. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC
Our goal: Get the best of everything!
● Eliminate the warehouse requirement
● Always have inventory
● Eliminate (or significantly reduce) waste
● Get the lowest possible unit rate
● Make it as invisible as possible
8. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC
How did we do it?
Cherry picked all the best parts!
● Completely eliminated our SAGE journals warehouse
● Moved inventory management to our printers
● Limited a journals inventory life to 1 year
● Moved to zero overs for all digitally printed titles
● Reduced all other standard titles to “micro” inventory
● Backed everything up with a robust POD program
9. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC
Hybrid POD
Micro inventory backed by a POD program
● Not “zero” inventory but
“invisible” inventory
• Invisible to external
and internal customers
POD
Inventory
12 copies in printer’s inventory
Order for 15 copies
12 from inventory + 3 POD = 15 bulk
10. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC
How does it add up?
Back issue orders = 28 copies
Traditional inventory model
150 copies in stock – 28 copies ordered =
150 @ $1 = $150
POD model
0 copies in stock – 28 copies ordered =
28 @ $4 = $112
Micro inventory (hybrid) model
20 copies in stock – 28 copies ordered =
(20 @ $1) + (8 @ $4) = $20 + $32 = $52
Micro Inventory
65% savings over traditional inventory
53% savings over straight POD
11. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC
Impact on inventory and cost
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2010
2013
Inventory
POD
0.78
0.79
0.8
0.81
0.82
0.83
0.84
0.85
0.86
0.87
2010 2011 2012 2013
Cost per copy
12. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC
Challenges to be aware of
● It is more work than traditional inventory
● It is more work than straight POD
● ROI
● No physical copies to grab
● Requires monitoring and adjustments
● Requires reporting
● POD covers will not match your PMS covers
13. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC
Finding the right solution
● Work with your printers
● Develop a model that works for your business
● Report, track, adjust, repeat
● Be flexible and make sure your printer is flexible
● It does not have to be an “all or nothing” approach
● “One size fits all” solutions do not work
14. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC
Thank you