SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 112
1
Range & Doppler
Measurements
in RADAR Systems
SOLO HERMELIN
Updated: 09.10.08
http://www.solohermelin.com
2
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Table of Contents
RADAR RF Signal
Radar Signals
Waveform Hierarchy
Doppler Effect due to Target Motion .( )0≠R
Continuous Wave Radar (CW Radar)
Basic CW Radar
Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
Linear Sawtooth Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
Sinusoidal Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
Multiple Frequency CW Radar (MFCW)
Phase Modulated Continuous Wave (PMCW)
3
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Table of Contents (continue – 1)
Pulse Waves
Pulse Compression Techniques
Stepped Frequency Waveform (SFWF)
Phase Coding
Resolution
Range Measurement Unambiguity
Unambiguous Range and Velocity
Coherent Pulse Doppler Radar
4
RADAR RF SignalsSOLO
The transmitted RADAR RF
Signal is:
( ) ( ) ( )[ ]ttftEtEt 0000 2cos ϕπ +=
E0 – amplitude of the signal
f0 – RF frequency of the signal
φ0 –phase of the signal (possible modulated)
The returned signal is delayed by the time that takes to signal to reach the target and to
return back to the receiver. Since the electromagnetic waves travel with the speed of light
c (much greater then RADAR and
Target velocities), the received signal
is delayed by
c
RR
td
21 +
≅
The received signal is: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( )tnoisettttfttEtE dddr +−+−−= ϕπα 00 2cos
To retrieve the range (and range-rate) information from the received signal the
transmitted signal must be modulated in Amplitude or/and Frequency or/and Phase.
ά < 1 represents the attenuation of the signal
5
SOLO
The received signal is:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( )tnoisettttfttEtE dddr +−+−−= ϕπα 00 2cos
( ) ( ) tRRtRtRRtR ⋅+=⋅+= 222111 & 
We want to compute the delay time td due to the time td1 it takes the EM-wave to reach
the target at a distance R1 (at t=0), from the transmitter, and to the time td2 it takes the
EM-wave to return to the receiver, at a distance R2 (at t=0) from the target. 21 ddd ttt +=
According to the Special Relativity Theory
the EM wave will travel with a constant
velocity c (independent of the relative
velocities ).21 & RR 
The EM wave that reached the target at
time t was send at td1 ,therefore
( ) ( ) 111111 ddd tcttRRttR ⋅=−⋅+=−  ( )
1
11
1
Rc
tRR
ttd 

+
⋅+
=
In the same way the EM wave received from the target at time t was reflected at td2 ,
therefore
( ) ( ) 222222 ddd tcttRRttR ⋅=−⋅+=−  ( )
2
22
2
Rc
tRR
ttd 

+
⋅+
=
RADAR RF Signals
6
SOLO
The received signal is:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( )tnoisettttfttEtE dddr +−+−−= ϕπα 00 2cos
21 ddd ttt += ( )
1
11
1
Rc
tRR
ttd 

+
⋅+
= ( )
2
22
2
Rc
tRR
ttd 

+
⋅+
=
( ) ( )
2
22
1
11
21
Rc
tRR
Rc
tRR
tttttttt ddd 



+
⋅+
−
+
⋅+
−=−−=−






+
−
+
−
+





+
−
+
−
=−
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
Rc
R
t
Rc
Rc
Rc
R
t
Rc
Rc
tt d 



From which:
or:
Since in most applications we can
approximate where they appear in the arguments of E0 (t-td), φ (t-td),
however, because f0 is of order of 109
Hz=1 GHz, in radar applications, we must use:
cRR <<21, 
1,
2
2
1
1
≈
+
−
+
−
Rc
Rc
Rc
Rc




( )   





−⋅










++





−⋅










+=





−⋅





−⋅+





−⋅





−⋅≈− 2
.
201
.
10
22
0
11
00
2
1
2
1
2
12
1
2
12
1
21
D
Ralong
FreqDoppler
DD
Ralong
FreqDoppler
Dd ttffttff
c
R
t
c
R
f
c
R
t
c
R
fttf

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( )tnoisettttffttEtE ddDdr +−+−⋅+−≈ ϕπα 00 2cos
where 21
2
2
1
121
2
02
1
01 ,,,,
2
,
2
dddddDDDDD ttt
c
R
t
c
R
tfff
c
R
ff
c
R
ff +=≈≈+=−≈−≈

Finally
Doppler Effect
RADAR RF Signals
7
SOLO
The received signal model:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( )tnoisettttffttEtE ddDdr +−+−⋅+−≈ ϕπα 00 2cos
Delayed by two-
way trip time
Scaled down
Amplitude Possible phase
modulated
Corrupted
By noise
Doppler
effect
We want to estimate:
• delay td range c td/2
• amplitude reduction α
• Doppler frequency fD
• noise power n (relative to signal power)
• phase modulation φ
Table of Content
RADAR RF Signals
8
RADAR SignalsSOLO
Waveforms
( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tttats θω += 0cos
a (t) – nonnegative function that represents any amplitude modulation (AM)
θ (t) – phase angle associated with any frequency modulation (FM)
ω0 – nominal carrier angular frequency ω0 = 2 π f0
f0 – nominal carrier frequency
Transmitted Signal
( ) ( ) ( )[ ]{ }ttjtats θω += 0exp
Phasor (complex, analytic) Transmitted Signal
9
RADAR SignalsSOLO
Quadrature Form
( ) ( ) ( )[ ]
( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( )tttattta
tttats
00
0
sinsincoscos
cos
ωθωθ
θω
−=
+=
where: ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]
( ) ( ) ( )[ ]ttats
ttats
Q
I
θ
θ
sin
cos
=
=
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )ttsttsts QI 00 sincos ωω −=
One other form: ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( ) ( )
[ ]tjtjtjtj
ee
ta
tttats θωθω
θω −−+
+=+= 00
2
cos 0
( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tjtj
etgetgts 00 *
2
1 ωω −
+= ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )tj
QI etatsjtstg θ
=+=:
Complex envelope
10
RADAR SignalsSOLO
Spectrum
Define the Fourier Transfer F
( ) ( ){ } ( ) ( )∫
+∞
∞−
−== dttjtstsS ωω exp:F ( ) ( ){ } ( ) ( )∫
+∞
∞−
==
π
ω
ωωω
2
exp:
d
tjSSts -1
F
( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tjtj
etgetgts 00 *
2
1 ωω −
+= ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]0
*
0
2
1
ωωωωω −−+−= GGS-1
F
F
-1
F
F
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )tj
QI etatsjtstg θ
=+=:
( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tttats θω += 0cos
Inverse Fourier Transfer F -1
Complex envelope
11
RADAR SignalsSOLO
Energy ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tttats θω += 0cos
( ) ( ) ( )[ ]{ } ( )∫∫∫
+∞
∞−
+∞
∞−
+∞
∞−
≈++== dttadttttadttsEs
2
0
22
2
1
22cos1
2
1
: θω
Parseval’s Formula
Proof:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )∫∫
+∞
∞−
+∞
∞−
= ωωω
π
dFFdttftf 2
*
12
*
1
2
1
( ) ( ) ( )∫
+∞
∞−
−= dttjtfF ωω exp11
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )∫∫ ∫∫ ∫∫
+∞
∞−
+∞
∞−
+∞
∞−
+∞
∞−
+∞
∞−
+∞
∞−
=−=−=
π
ω
ωω
π
ω
ωω
π
ω
ωω
22
exp
2
exp 2
*
112
*
2
*
12
*
1
d
FF
d
dttjtfFdt
d
tjFtfdttftf
( ) ( ) ( )∫
+∞
∞−
−=
π
ω
ωω
2
exp
*
2
*
2
d
tjFtf
If s (t) is real, than s (t) = s*(t) and
( ) ( ) ( )∫∫∫
+∞
∞−
+∞
∞−
+∞
∞−
=== ωω
π
dSdttsdttsEs
222
2
1
:
12
RADAR SignalsSOLO
Energy (continue – 1) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tttats θω += 0cos
( ) ( ) ( )∫∫∫
+∞
∞−
+∞
∞−
+∞
∞−
=== ωω
π
dSdttsdttsEs
222
2
1
:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( )[ ]
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 





−−−+−−−+
−−−−+−−
=
−−+−−−+−=
−
−−
00
0000
0
*
0
*2
00
0
*
00
*
0
00
*
0
*
0
*
4
1
4
1
ϕϕ
ϕϕϕϕ
ωωωωωωωω
ωωωωωωωω
ωωωωωωωωωω
jj
jjjj
eGGeGG
GGGG
eGeGeGeGSS
For finite band signals (see Figure)
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )∫∫∫
∫∫
∞+
∞−
∞+
∞−
∞+
∞−
+∞
∞−
−
+∞
∞−
=−−−−=−−
≈−−−=−−−
ωωωωωωωωωωωωω
ωωωωωωωωωω ϕϕ
dGGdGGdGG
deGGdeGG jj
*
0
*
00
*
0
2
0
*
0
*2
00 000
( ) ( )∫∫
+∞
∞−
+∞
∞−
≈= ωω
π
ωω
π
dGdSEs
22
2
1
2
1
2
1
:
Table of Content
13
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
Radar Waveforms
CW Radars Pulsed Radars
Frequency
Modulated CW
Phase
Modulated CW
bi – phase &
poly-phase
Linear FMCW
Sawtooth, or
Triangle
Nonlinear FMCW
Sinusoidal,
Multiple Frequency,
Noise, Pseudorandom
Intra-pulse
Modulation
Pulse-to-pulse
Modulation,
Frequency Agility
Stepped Frequency
Frequency
Modulate
Linear FM
Nonlinear FM
Phase
Modulated
bi – phase
poly-phase
Unmodulated
CW
Multiple Frequency
Frequency
Shift Keying
Fixed
Frequency
14
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
( )tf
2
τ
2
τ
−
A
∞→t
2
τ
+T
2
τ
−T
A
2
τ
+−T
2
τ
−−T
A
t←∞−
T T
A
t
A
t
A
LINEAR FM PULSECODED PULSE
T T
PULSED (INTRAPULSE CODING)
t
( )tf
A
2
τ
2
τ
−T
AA
T T
A
2
2
τ
+T
2
2
τ
−T
A
T T
A
2
τ
− 2
τ
+T
TN
t
( )tf
A
2
τ
2
τ
−T
AA
T T
A
2
2
τ
+T
2
2
τ
−T
A
T T
A
2
τ
− 2
τ
+T
TN
PHASE CODED PULSES HOPPED FREQUENCY PULSES
PULSED (INTERPULSE CODING)
t
( )tf
A
T
2/τ−
LOW PRF
MEDIUM PRF
PULSED
( )tf
T T T T
2/τ+
τ
HIGH PRF
T
T T T
A Partial List of the Family of RADAR Waveforms
15
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Radar Waveforms and their Fourier Transforms
16
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Radar Waveforms and their Fourier Transforms
17
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Table of Content
18
Doppler Effect due to Target Motion .
SOLO
ΔT – time from point A to travel from
radar to target at range R0
(at transmission time t0) is
c
TRR
T
∆+
=∆

0
Rc
R
T
−
=∆ 0
Total round-trip is 2ΔT . Therefore point A
returns to radar at
Rc
R
TT
−
+= 0
01
2
Point B returns to radar at
Rc
R
TTT RF −
++= 1
02
2
where and
RFRF
RF
f
T
ω
π21
== RFTRRR += 01
( )






−
+
=
−
+=
−
−
+=−=
Rc
Rc
T
Rc
TR
T
Rc
RR
TTTT RF
RF
RFRF 




22
:' 01
12
λ
λ
R
f
c
R
f
c
R
c
R
f
T
f RF
fc
RF
c
R
RF
RF 

 
22
1
1
1
'
1
'
/
1
−=





−≈












+
−
==
=
<<
λ
R
fDoppler
2
−=
Two Way
Doppler Frequency Shift
( )0≠R
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR Systems
19
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
The received signal is:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( )
( ) ( ) ( )tnoise
c
RR
tRRtftE
tnoisettttfttEtE
fc
dddr
+










 +
−++−=
+−+−−=
=
21
21
0
000
/
00
2
2cos
2cos
00
ϕ
λ
π
πα
ϕπα
λ
If we consider only (c = speed of light) then the frequency of the electromagnetic
wave that reaches the receiver is given by:
c
td
Rd
<<




















+
−≈






+












+−=











 +
−+




 +
−=
c
td
Rd
td
Rd
f
c
td
Rd
td
Rd
ud
d
ff
c
RR
t
c
RR
tf
td
d
f
21
0
21
0~
00
2121
0
1
2
1
2
2
1

ϕ
π
ϕπ
π
λ






+
−=
td
Rd
td
Rd
fd
21
is the doppler frequency shift at the receiver
Christian Johann Doppler first observed the effect in acoustics.
20
2-Way Doppler Shift Versus Velocity and Radio FrequencySOLO
Table of Content
λλ logloglog −=⇒−=
td
Rd
f
td
Rd
f dd
21
SOLO
• Transmitter always on
• Range information can be obtained by modulating EM wave
[e.g., frequency modulation (FM), phase modulation (PM)]
• Simple radars used for speed timing, semi-active missile illuminators,
altimeters, proximity fuzes.
• Continuous Wave Radar (CW Radar)
Table of Content
22
SOLO • Continuous Wave Radar (CW Radar)
The basic CW Radar will transmit an unmodulated (fixed carrier frequency) signal.
( ) [ ]00cos ϕω += tAts
The received signal (in steady – state) will be.
( ) ( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕωωα +−+= dDr ttAts
α – attenuation factor
ωD – two way Doppler shift
c
RfR
ff
fc
DDD

0
/
22
&2
0
−=−==
=λ
λ
πω
The Received Power is related to the Transmitted Power by (Radar Equation):
4
1
~
RP
P
tr
rcv
One solution is to have separate antennas
for transmitting and receiving.
For R = 103
m this ratio is 10-12
or 120 db.
This means that we must have a good
isolation between continuously
transmitting energy and receiving energy.
Basic CW Radar
23
SOLO • Continuous Wave Radar (CW Radar)
The received signal (in steady – state) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]002cos ϕπα +−⋅+= dDr ttffAts
We can see that the sign of the Doppler is ambiguous (we get the same result for positive
and negative ωD).
To solve the problem of doppler sign ambiguity
we can split the Local Oscillator into two
channels and phase shifting the
Signal in one by 90◦
(quadrature - Q) with
respect to other channel (in-phase – I). Both
channels are downconverted to baseband.
If we look at those channels as the real and
imaginary parts of a complex signal, we get:
has the Fourier Transform: ( ){ } ( ) ( )[ ]DDv ts ωωδωωδπ ++−=F
After being heterodyned to baseband (video band), the signal becomes (after ignoring
amplitude factors and fixed-phase terms): ( ) [ ]tts Dv ωcos=
( ) ( ) ( )[ ] tj
DDv
D
etjtts ω
ωω
2
1
sincos
2
1
=+= ( ){ } ( )Dv ts ωωδ
π
−=
2
F
Table of Content
24
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
The transmitted signal is: ( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕθω ++= ttAts
The frequency of this signal is: ( ) ( )





+= t
dt
d
tf θω
π
0
2
1
For FMCW the θ (t) has a linear slope as seen in the figures bellow
Table of Content
25
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
The received signal is:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕθωωα +−+−+= ddDr ttttAts
α – attenuation factor
( ) ( )



−++= dDr tt
dt
d
fftf θ
π2
1
0
ωD – two way Doppler shift
λ
πω
R
ff DDD
2
&2 −==
td – two way time delay
c
R
td
2
=
The frequency of received signal is:
λ – mean value of wavelength
Linear Sawtooth Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
26
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
To extract the information we must subtract the received signal frequency from
the transmitted signal frequency. This is done by mixing (multiplying) those signals
and use a Lower Side-Band Filter to retain the difference of frequencies
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Ddrb ftt
dt
d
t
dt
d
tftftf −



−−



=−= θ
π
θ
π 2
1
2
1
The frequency of mixed signal is:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕθωωα +−+−+= ddDr ttttAts
( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕθω ++= ttAts
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]ddD
ddDdr
ttttttA
ttttttAts
−++−+++
−−+−−=
θθωωωα
θθωωα
00
2
0
2
cos
2
1
cos
2
1
Lower Side-Band
Filter
Lower SB Filter
Linear Sawtooth Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
27
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
The returned signal has a frequency change due to:
• two way time delay c
R
td
2
=
• two way doppler addition λ
R
fD
2
−=
From Figure above, the beat frequencies fb (difference between transmitted to
received frequencies) for a Linear Sawtooth Frequency Modulation are:
D
m
Dd
m
b fR
Tc
f
ft
T
f
f −
∆
=−
∆
=
+ 4
2/
D
m
Dd
m
b fR
Tc
f
ft
T
f
f −
∆
−=−
∆
−=
− 4
2/
( )
28
−+
−
∆
= bbm ff
f
Tc
R ( )
2
−+
+
−= bb
D
ff
f
We have 2 equations with 2 unknowns R and fD
with the solution:
Linear Sawtooth Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
28
SOLO
• Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
The Received Power is related to the Transmitted Power by (Radar Equation):
For R = 103
m this ratio is 10-12
or 120 db. This means that we must have a good
isolation between continuously transmitting energy and receiving energy.
4
1
~
RP
P
tr
rcv
One solution is to have separate antennas for transmitting and receiving.
Linear Sawtooth Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
29
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
Linear Sawtooth Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
Performing Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) we obtain fb
+
and fb.
( )
28
−+
−
∆
= bbm ff
f
Tc
R
( )
2
−+
+
−= bb
D
ff
f
From the Doppler Window we get fb
+
and fb
-
, from which:
30
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
The received signal is:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕθωωα +−+−+= ddDr ttttAts
α – attenuation factor
( ) ( )



−++= dDr tt
dt
d
fftf θ
π2
1
0
ωD – two way Doppler shift
λ
πω
R
ff DDD
2
&2 −==
td – two way time delay
c
R
td
2
=
The frequency of received signal is:
λ – mean value of wavelength
Linear Triangular Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
31
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
To extract the information we must subtract the received signal frequency from
the transmitted signal frequency. This is done by mixing (multiplying) those signals
and use a Lower Side-Band Filter to retain the difference of frequencies
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Ddrb ftt
dt
d
t
dt
d
tftftf −



−−



=−= θ
π
θ
π 2
1
2
1
The frequency of mixed signal is:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕθωωα +−+−+= ddDr ttttAts
( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕθω ++= ttAts
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]ddD
ddDdr
ttttttA
ttttttAts
−++−+++
−−+−−=
θθωωωα
θθωωα
00
2
0
2
cos
2
1
cos
2
1
Lower Side-Band
Filter
Lower SB Filter
Linear Triangular Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
32
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
The returned signal has a frequency change due to:
• two way time delay c
R
td
2
=
• two way doppler addition λ
R
fD
2
−=
From Figure above, the beat frequencies fb (difference between transmitted to
received frequencies) for a Linear Triangular Frequency Modulation are:
D
m
Dd
m
b fR
Tc
f
ft
T
f
f −
∆
=−
∆
=
+ 8
4/
positive
slope
D
m
Dd
m
b fR
Tc
f
ft
T
f
f −
∆
−=−
∆
−=
− 8
4/
negative
slope
( )
28
−+
−
∆
= bbm ff
f
Tc
R ( )
2
−+
+
−= bb
D
ff
f
We have 2 equations with 2 unknowns R and fD
with the solution:
Linear Triangular Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
33
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
The Range Unambiguity is given by
the FMCW time period Tm:
Range Resolution is a function of FMCW bandwidth and the linearity of FM:
msunambiguou T
c
R
2
=
To preserve this Range Resolution the non-linearity must be:
For Linear Triangular FMCW the bandwidth is: fB ∆= 2
For a perfect Linear Triangular modulation the Range Resolution is given by:
f
c
B
c
R
∆
== 2δ
mm
m
sunambiguou TfTBT
c
B
c
R
R
tynonlineari
∆
===<<
2
11
2
2δ
Linear Triangular Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
34
SOLO
• Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
The Received Power is related to the Transmitted Power by (Radar Equation):
For R = 103
m this ratio is
10-12
or 120 db. This means that
we must have a good isolation
between continuously transmitting
energy and receiving energy.
4
1
~
RP
P
tr
rcv
But solutions with a common
antenna for transmitting and
receiving, and with a good
isolation between them, do exist.
One solution is to have separate
antennas for transmitting and
receiving.
35
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
One Target Detected
Performing FFT for
the positive slope we
obtain fb
+
.
Performing FFT for
the negative slope we
obtain fb
-
.
( )
28
−+
−
∆
= bbm ff
f
Tc
R
( )
2
−+
+
−= bb
D
ff
f
Two Targets Detected
Performing FFT for each of
the positive and negative
slopes we obtain two Beats in
each Doppler window and we
cannot say what is the pair in
the other window. A solution
to solve this is to add an
unmodulated segment (see
next slide)
36
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
Two Targets Detected
Performing FFT for each of the
positive, negative and zero slopes
we obtain two Beats in each
Doppler window.
To solve two targets we can use the
Segmented Linear Frequency
Modulation.
In the zero slope Doppler
window, we obtain the Doppler
frequency of the two targets fD1
and fD2.
Since , it is
easy to find the pair from
Positive and Negative Slope
Windows that fulfill this condition, and then to compute the respective ranges using:
( )
2
−+
+
−= bb
D
ff
f
( )
28
−+
−
∆
= bbm ff
f
Tc
R
This is a solution for more than two targets.
One other solution that can solve also range and doppler ambiguities is to use many
modulation slopes (Δ f and Tm).
Table of Content
37
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
Sinusoidal Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
One of the practical frequency
modulations is the Sinusoidal
Frequency Modulation.
Assume that the transmitted
signal is:
( ) ( )




 ∆
+= tf
f
f
tfAts m
m
ππ 2sin2sin 0
The spectrum of this signal is:
( ) ( )
( )[ ] ( )[ ]{ }
( )[ ] ( )[ ]{ }
( )[ ] ( )[ ]{ }
+
−++




 ∆
+
−++




 ∆
+
−++




 ∆
+





 ∆
=
tfftff
f
f
JA
tfftff
f
f
JA
tfftff
f
f
JA
tf
f
f
JAts
mm
m
mm
m
mm
m
m
32sin32sin
22sin22sin
2sin2sin
2sin
003
002
001
00
ππ
ππ
ππ
π
where Jn (u) is the Bessel Function
of the first kind, n order and argument
u.
Bessel Functions of the first kind
38
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
Sinusoidal Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
One of the practical frequency
modulations is the Sinusoidal
Frequency Modulation.
Assume that the transmitted
signal is:
( ) ( )




 ∆
+= tf
f
f
tfAts m
m
ππ 2sin2sin 0
The transmitted and received signal are heterodyned in a mixer to give the difference
frequency
The received signal is:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]






−
∆
+−⋅+= dm
m
dD ttf
f
f
ttffAtr ππα 2sin2sin 0
Lower Side-Band
Filter
( )ts
( )tr
( )[ ] ( )[ ] ( )





 ∆
−−
∆
+−+ tf
f
f
ttf
f
f
ttftfA m
m
dm
m
dDd πππα 2sin2sin2cos 0
2
( )[ ] ( )


















−
∆
−−+=
2
2cossin
2
2cos 0
2 d
mdm
m
dDd
t
tftf
f
f
ttftfA πππα
39
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
Sinusoidal Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
Since td << Tm=1/fm we have
( ) ( )[ ] ( )


















−
∆
−−+=
2
2cossin
2
2cos 0
2 d
mdm
m
dDd
t
tftf
f
f
ttftfAtm πππα
Lower Side-Band
Filter
( )ts
( )tr
( )tm
( ) ( )[ ]


















−∆−−+≈
2
2cos22cos 0
2 d
mddDd
t
tftfttftfAtm πππα
The frequency is obtained by differentiating the argument of this equation with respect
to time
( )[ ]
( ) 











−∆+=


















−∆−−+=
2
2sin2
2
2cos22
2
1
0
d
mmdD
d
mddDdb
t
tfftff
t
tftfttftf
td
d
f
ππ
πππ
π
( )
m
m
dm
m f
d
mdmD
f tf
d
mmdD
m
f
b
m
b
t
tftfffdt
t
tfftff
f
dtf
f
f
2
1
0
2
1
0
12
1
0
2
2cos2
2
2sin2
2
1
1
2
1
1


















−∆−≈


















−∆+== ∫∫
<<
πππ
π
The average of the beat frequency over one-half a modulating cycle is:
40
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
Sinusoidal Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
Lower Side-Band
Filter
( )ts
( )tr
( )tm
R
c
ff
ftffff m
DdmD
tf
b
dm ∆
+=∆+≈=
<<
+
8
4
1π
The average of the beat frequency over one-half a modulating cycle
is:
( ) ( )




 ∆
+= tf
f
f
tfAts m
m
ππ 2sin2sin 0
By changing the phase of the sinusoidal modulation
by 180 degree each modulation cycle, we will get:
( ) ( )




 ∆
−=− tf
f
f
tfAts m
m
ππ 2sin2sin 0
R
c
ff
ftffff m
DdmD
tf
b
dm ∆
−=∆−≈=
<<
−
8
4
1π
The average of the beat frequency over one-half a
modulating cycle is:
41
SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
Sinusoidal Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
Lower Side-Band
Filter
( )ts
( )tr
( )tm
R
c
ff
ftffff m
DdmD
tf
b
dm ∆
+=∆+≈=
<<
+
8
4
1π
A possible modulating is describe bellow, in which we introduce a unmodulated segment
to measure the doppler and two sinusoidal modulation segments in anti-phase.
From which we obtain:
R
c
ff
ftffff m
DdmD
tf
b
dm ∆
−=∆−≈=
<<
−
8
4
1π
The averages of the beat frequency over one-half a modulating cycle are:
28
−+
−
∆
=
bbm
ff
f
Tc
R
2
−+
+
=
bb
D
ff
f
(must be the same as in
unmodulated segment)
Note: We obtaind the same form as for Triangular Frequency Modulated CW
Table of Content
42
SOLO • Multiple Frequency CW Radar (MFCW)
Assume that the transmitted signal is: ( ) [ ]tfAts 02sin π=
The received signal is: ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]dD ttffAtr −⋅+= 02sin πα
c
R
t
c
R
ff dD
2
,
2
10 ≈−≈

( ) ( ) 



⋅−⋅−⋅+=
c
R
f
c
R
ftffAtr DD
2
2
2
22sin 00 πππα
where:
Therefore:
We can see that the change in received phase Δφ is related to range R by:
2/
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
/
00
00
λ
ππππϕ
λ
R
c
R
f
c
R
f
c
R
f
cfff
D
D =>>
=⋅≈⋅+⋅=∆
The maximum unambiguous range is given when Δφ=2π : 2/λ=sunambiguouR
( ) ( )GHzfmmBandLGHzfcm 956.1115 00 =÷→==λ
We can see that the maximum unambiguous range is too small, when we use a
single transmitted frequency, for any practical applications.
43
SOLO • Multiple Frequency CW Radar (MFCW)
Assume that the transmitted signal is: ( ) [ ]tfAts 02sin π=
The received signal is: ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]dD ttffAtr −⋅+= 02sin πα
c
R
t
c
R
ff dD
2
,
2
10 ≈−≈

( ) ( ) 



⋅−⋅−⋅+=
c
R
f
c
R
ftffAtr DD
2
2
2
22sin 00 πππα
where:
Therefore:
We can see that the change in received phase Δφ is related to range R by:
2/
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
/
00
00
λ
ππππϕ
λ
R
c
R
f
c
R
f
c
R
f
cfff
D
D =>>
=⋅≈⋅+⋅=∆
The maximum unambiguous range is given when Δφ=2π : 2/λ=sunambiguouR
( ) ( )GHzfmmBandLGHzfcm 956.1115 00 =÷→==λ
We can see that the maximum unambiguous range is too small, when we use a
single transmitted frequency, for any practical applications.
The maximum unambiguous range can be increased by using multiple
transmitted frequencies.
44
SOLO
Assume that the transmitter transmits n CW frequencies fi (i=0,1,…,n-1)
Transmitted signals are: ( ) [ ] 1,,1,02sin −== nitfAts iii π
The received signals are: ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]dDiiiii ttffAtr −⋅+= πα 2sin
c
R
t
c
R
f
c
R
fff d
i
j
jDi
2
,
22
10
1
0 ≈−≈







∆+−≈ ∑=
where:
1,,2,11 −=∆+= − nifff iii 
Since we want to use no more than one antenna for transmitted signals and one antenna
for received signals we must have
1,,2,10
1
−=<<∆∑=
niff
i
j
j 
We can see that the change in received phase Δφi , of two adjacent signals, is related
to range R by:
( ) c
R
f
c
R
c
R
f
c
R
f
c
R
ff
c
R
f i
cR
iiDDii ii
2
2
22
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
⋅∆≈⋅⋅∆+⋅∆=⋅−+⋅∆=∆
<<
−
πππππϕ

The maximum unambiguous range is given when Δφi=2π :
i
sunambiguou
f
c
R
∆
=
2
• Multiple Frequency CW Radar (MFCW)
45
SOLO • Multiple Frequency CW Radar (MFCW)
Table of Content
46
SOLO • Phase Modulated Continuous Wave (PMCW)
Another way to obtain a time mark in a CW signal is by using Phase Modulation (PM).
PMCW radar measures target range by applying a discrete phase shift every T seconds
to the transmitted CW signal, producing a phase-code waveform. The returning waveform
is correlated with a stored version of the transmitted waveform. The correlation process
gives a maximum when we have a match. The time to achieve this match is the time-delay
between transmitted and receiving signals and provides the required target range.
There are two types of phase coding techniques: binary phase codes and polyphase codes.
In the figure bellow we can see a 7-length Barker binary phase code of the transmitted
signal
47
SOLO • Phase Modulated Continuous Wave (PMCW)
In the figure bellow we can see a 7-length Barker binary phase code of the received
signal that, at the receiver, passes a 7-cell delay line, and is correlated to a sample
of the 7-length Barker binary signal sample.
Digital Correlation
At the Receiver the coded pulse enters a
7 cells delay lane (from left to right),
a bin at each clock.
The signals in the cells are summed
-1 = -1
+1 -1 = 0
-1 +1 -1 = -1
-1 -1 +1-( -1) = 0
+1 -1 -1 –(+1)-( -1) = -1
+1 +1 -1-(-1) –(+1)-1= 0
+1+1 +1-( -1)-(-1) +1-(-1)= 8
+1+1 –(+1)-( -1) -1-( +1)= 0
+1-(+1) –(+1) -1-( -1)= -1
-(+1)-(+1) +1 -( -1)= 0
-(+1)+1-(+1) = -1
+1-(+1) = 0
-(+1) = -1
0 = 0
-1-1 -1
clock
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
+1+1+1+1
Table of Content
48
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Pulse Waves
• Range Resolution is determined by the system bandwidth
B
cc
R
B
Filter
Matched 22
/1 ττ =
==∆
200 MHz  1 meter
325 MHz  2 feet
650 MHz  1 foot
1300 MHz  6 inch
• Use short pulse (τ) for high resolution, or, bandwidth can be achieved by:
• Pulse Compression – intra-pulse coding
• Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW)
• Stretch Processing
• Stepped Frequency Waveform (SFWF) – pulse-to-pulse coding
Table of Content
49
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Pulse Compression Techniques
• Wave Coding
• Frequency Modulation (FM)
- Linear
• Phase Modulation (PM)]
- Non-linear
- Pseudo-Random Noise (PRN)
- Bi-phase (0º/180º)
- Quad-phase (0º/90º/180º/270º)
• Implementation
• Hardware
- Surface Acoustic Wave (SAW) expander/compressor
• Digital Control
- Direct Digital Synthesizer (DDS)
- Software compression “filter”
Table of Content
50
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Stepped Frequency Waveform (SFWF)
The Stepped Frequency Waveform is a Pulse Radar System technique for
obtaining high resolution range profiles with relative narrow bandwidth pulses.
• SFWF is an ensemble of narrow band (monochromatic) pulses, each of which
is stepped in frequency relative to the preceding pulse, until the required
bandwidth is covered.
• We process the ensemble of received signals using FFT processing.
• The resulting FFT output represents a high resolution range profile of the
Radar illuminated area.
• Sometimes SFWF is used in conjunction with pulse compression.
51
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Stepped Frequency Waveform (SFWF)
52
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Pulse Compression Techniques
53
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Steped Frequency Waveform (SFWF)
Table of Content
54
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Pulse Compression Techniques
55
56
57
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Pulse Compression Techniques
58
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Pulse Compression Techniques
Phase Coding
A transmitted radar pulse of duration T is divided in N sub-pulses of equal duration
τ = T/N, and each sub-pulse is phase coded in terms of the phase of the carrier.
The complex envelope of the phase coded
signal is given by:
( )
( )
( )∑
−
=
−=
1
0
2/1
1 N
n
n ntu
N
tg τ
τ
where:
( )
( )


 ≤≤
=
elsewhere
tj
tu n
n
0
0exp τϕ
59
-1
Pulse bi-phase Barker coded of length 3
Digital Correlation
At the Receiver the coded pulse
enters a 3 cells delay lane (from left to
right), a bin at each clock.
The signals in the cells are multiplied
according to ck* sign and summed.
clock
-1 = -11
+1 -1 = 02
-( +1) = -15
0 = 06
+1 +1-( -1) = 33
+1-( +1) = 04
SOLO Pulse Compression Techniques
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
+1+1
0 = 00
60
-1 = -1
+1 -1 = 0
-1 +1 -1 = -1
-1 -1 +1-( -1) = 0
+1 -1 -1 –(+1)-( -1) = -1
+1 +1 -1-(-1) –(+1)-1= 0
+1+1 +1-( -1)-(-1) +1-(-1)= 8
+1+1 –(+1)-( -1) -1-( +1)= 0
+1-(+1) –(+1) -1-( -1)= -1
-(+1)-(+1) +1 -( -1)= 0
-(+1)+1-(+1) = -1
+1-(+1) = 0
-(+1) = -1
0 = 0
-1-1 -1
Pulse bi-phase Barker coded of length 7
Digital Correlation
At the Receiver the coded pulse enters a
7 cells delay lane (from left to right),
a bin at each clock.
The signals in the cells are summed
clock
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
SOLO Pulse Compression Techniques
+1+1+1+1
61
-1 = -1
-j +j = 0
+j -1-j = -1
+1 +1+1+1 = 4
-j-1+j = -1
+j - j = 0
Pulse poly-phase coded of length 4
At the Receiver the coded pulse enters a 3 cells delay lane (from
left to right), a bin at each clock.
The signals in the cells are multiplied by -1,+j,-j or +1 and summed.
clock
SOLO
Poly-Phase Modulation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1+
1+j+
1+j+j−
1+j+j−1−
j+j−1−
j−1−
1−
1− 1+j+ j−
-1 = -1
0
Σ
62
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Resolution
Resolution is the spacing (in range, Doppler, angle, etc.) we must have in order to
distinguish between two different targets.
first target
response
second target
response
composite
target
response
greather then 3 db
Distinguishable
Targets
first target
response
second target
response
composite
target
response
Undistinguishable
Targets
less then 3 db
The two targets are distinguishable if
the composite (sum) of the received
signal has a deep (between the two
picks) of at least 3 db.
63
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Pulse Range Resolution
Resolution is the spacing (in range, Doppler, angle, etc.) we must have in order to
distinguish between two different targets.
Range Resolution
RADAR
τ
c
R
RR ∆+
Target # 1
Target # 2
Assume two targets spaced by a range
Δ R and a radar pulse of τ seconds.
The echoes start to be received
at the radar antenna at times:
2 R/c – first target
2 (R+Δ R)/c – second target
The echo of the first target ends
at 2 R/c + τ
τ τ
time from pulse
transmission
c
R2 ( )
c
RR ∆+2
τ+
c
R2
Received
Signals
Target # 1 Target # 2
The two targets echoes can be
resolved if:
c
RR
c
R ∆+
=+ 22 τ
2
τc
R =∆ Pulse Range Resolution
64
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Pulse Range Resolution (continue)
time from pulse
transmission
c
R2 ( )
c
RR ∆+2
τ+
c
R2
Received
Signals
Target #1 Target #2
Rcvτ Rcvτ
2
τc
R =∆Pulse Range Resolution
To improve the Pulse Range
Resolution we must decrease the
Received pulse duration τRcv.
This is done by Pulse Compression
technique:
• Linear or Nonlinear Frequency Modulation
• Phase Modulation (bi-phase, poly-phase)
The Pulse Range Resolution therefore is given by
1/
2 2
Rcv RcvBW
Rcv
Rcv
c c
R
BW
τ
τ ≈
∆ = =
65
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Angle Resolution
Resolution is the spacing (in range, Doppler, angle, etc.) we must have in order to
distinguish between two different targets.
Angle Resolution
RADAR
Target # 1
Target # 2
R
R
3
θ 





2
cos 3θ
R
3
3
2
sin2 θ
θ
RR ≈





Angle Resolution is Determined by Antenna Beamwidth.
3
3
2
sin2 θ
θ
RRRC ≈





=∆
Angle Resolution is considered equivalent to the 3 db Antenna Beamwidth θ3.
The Cross Range Resolution is given by:
66
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Doppler Resolution
The Doppler resolution is defined by
the Bandwidth of the Doppler Filters
BWDoppler.
Doppler Dopplerf BW∆ =
67
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Resolution Cell
Resolution is the spacing (in range, Doppler, angle, etc.) we must have in order to
distinguish between two different targets.
Resolution Cell
RADAR
R∆ 3
θR
3
φR
The Volume Resolution Cell is the volume defined by the subtended solid angle and
range resolution.

RRRRR
RR
V
rrectangulaofarea
ellipseofarea
∆≈∆=∆











=∆

  
33
2
33
2
785.0
33
422
φθφθ
πφθ
π
Volume Resolution Cell increases with R2
.
68
Range Measurement Unambiguity
( )tf1
t
2
τ
2
2
τ
−T
T
A
T T T
2
τ
−
2
2
τ
+T
2
τ
−T
2
τ
+T
1 2 3c
R
t
2
=
( )tf1
t
2
τ
2
2
τ
−T
RA
T T T
2
τ
− 2
2
τ
+T
2
τ
−T
2
τ
+T
1 2 3
TransmittedPulses
ReceivedPulses
SOLO
The returned signal from the target
located at a range R from the transmitter
reaches the receiver (collocated with the
transmitter) after
c
R
t
2
=
To detect the target, a train of pulses must
be transmitted.
PRT – Pulse Repetition Time
PRF – Pulse Repetition Frequency = 1/PRT
To have an unanbigous target range the received pulse must arrive before the transmission
of the next pulse, therefore:
PRF
PRT
c
Runabigous 1
2
=<
PRF
c
Runabigous
2
<
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR Systems
69
Range measurementSOLO
70
SOLO
71
SOLO
72
Resolving Range Measurement Ambiguity
SOLO
To solve the ambiguity of targets return
we must use multiple batches, each with
different PRIs (Pulse Repetition Interval).
Example: one target, use two batches
First batch: PRI 1 = T1
Target Return = t1-amb
R1_amb=2 c t1_amb
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR Systems
Second batch: PRI 2 = T2
Target Return = t2-amb
R2_amb=2 c t2_amb
To find the range, R, we must solve for the integers k1 and k2
in the equation:
( ) ( )ambamb tTkctTkcR _222_111 22 +=+=
We have 2 equations with 3 unknowns: R, k1 and k2, that can be solved because
k1 and k2 are integers. One method is to use the Chinese Remainder Theorem .
For more targets, more batches must be used to solve the Range ambiguity.
See Tildocs # 763333 v1
73
SOLO
74
SOLO
75
SOLO
76
Doppler Frequency Shifts (Hz) for Various Radar Frequency Bands and Target Speeds
Band 1 m/s 1 knot 1 mph
L (1 GHz)
S (3 GHz)
C (5 GHz)
X (10 GHz)
Ku (16 GHz)
Ka (35 GHz)
mm (96
GHz)
6.67
20.0
33.3
66.7
107
233
633
3.43
10.3
17.1
34.3
54.9
120
320
2.98
8.94
14.9
29.8
47.7
104
283
Radar
Frequency Radial Target Speed
SOLO
77
Coherent Pulse Doppler RadarSOLO
• STALO provides a
continuous frequency
fLO
• COHO provides the
coherent Intermediate
Frequency fIF
• Pulse Modulator
defines the pulse width
the Pulses Rate
Frequency (PRF)
number of pulses in a
batch
• Transmitter/Receiver (T/R) (Circulator)
- in the Transmission Phase directs the Transmitted Energy to the Antenna and
isolates the Receiving Channel
• IF Amplifier is a Band Pass Filter in the Receiving Channel centered around
IF frequency fIF.
• Mixer multiplies two sinusoidal signals providing signals with sum or
differences of the input frequencies
- in the Receiving Phase directs the Received Energy to the Receiving Channel
21 ff >>
2f
1f
21 ff +
21 ff −
78
SOLO Coherent Pulse Doppler Radar
An idealized target doppler response will
provide at IF Amplifier output the signal:
( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( )
[ ]tjtj
dIFIF
dIFdIF
ee
A
tAts ωωωω
ωω +−+
+=+=
2
cos
that has the spectrum:
f
fIF+fd
-fIF-fd
-fIF fIF
A2
/4A2
/4 |s|2
0
Because we used N coherent pulses of
width τ and with Pulse Repetition Time T
the spectrum at the IF Amplifier output
f
-fd fd
A2
/4A2
/4
|s|2
0
After the mixer and base-band filter:
( ) ( ) [ ]tjtj
dd
dd
ee
A
tAts ωω
ω −
+==
2
cos
We can not distinguish between
positive to negative doppler!!!
and after the mixer :
79
SOLO Coherent Pulse Doppler Radar
We can not distinguish
between positive to negative
doppler!!!
Split IF Signal:
( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( )
[ ]tjtj
dIFIF
dIFdIF
ee
A
tAts ωωωω
ωω +−+
+=+=
2
cos
( ) ( )[ ]
( ) ( )[ ]t
A
ts
t
A
ts
dIFQ
dIFI
ωω
ωω
+=
+=
sin
2
cos
2
Define a New Complex Signal:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tj
QI
dIF
e
A
tsjtstg ωω +
=+=
2
f
fIF+fd
fIF
A2
/2|g|2
0
f
fd
A2
/2
|s|2
0
Combining the signals after the mixers
( ) tj
d
d
e
A
tg ω
2
=
We now can distinguish
between positive to negative
doppler!!!
80
SOLO Coherent Pulse Doppler Radar
Split IF Signal:
( ) ( )[ ]
( ) ( )[ ]t
A
ts
t
A
ts
dIFQ
dIFI
ωω
ωω
+=
+=
sin
2
cos
2
Define a New Complex Signal:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tj
QI
dIF
e
A
tsjtstg ωω +
=+=
2
f
fd
A2
/2
|s|2
0
Combining the signals after the mixers
( ) tj
d
d
e
A
tg ω
2
=
We now can distinguish
between positive to negative
doppler!!!
From the Figure we can see that in this
case the doppler is unambiguous only if:
T
ff PRd
1
=<
Because we used N coherent pulses of
width τ and with Pulse Repetition Time T
the spectrum after the mixer output is
81
Resolving Doppler Measurement Ambiguity






+=





+= ambDambD f
T
kf
T
kV _2
2
2_1
1
1
1
2
1
2
λλ
SOLO
To solve the Doppler ambiguity of targets
return we must use multiple batches, each with
different PRIs (Pulse Repetition Interval).
Example: one target, use two batches
First batch: PRI 1 = T1
Target Doppler Return in Range Gate i =
fD1-amb
V1_amb=(λ/2) fD1_amb
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR Systems
To find the range-rate, V, we must solve for the integers k1 and k2
in the equation:
We have 2 equations with 3 unknowns: V, k1 and k2, that can be solved because
k1 and k2 are integers. One method is to use the Chinese Remainder Theorem .
Second batch: PRI 2 = T2
Target Doppler Return in Range Gate i =
fD2-amb
V2_amb=(λ/2) fD2_amb
For more targets, more batches must be used to solve the Doppler ambiguity.
See Tildocs # 763333 v1
Return to
Table of Content
82
SOLO Coherent Pulse Doppler Radar
83
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Phase Comparison Monopulse
dα
Port A
Port B
S
D
α
cos
d
Antenna
Boresight
α
λ
π
ψ cos
2
d=
wavefront
for a point
source
at infinity
To illustrate the Monopulse Antenna
assume thsat the RF is received through
only two ports A and B.
When the rays are received from
a direction ά relative to the Antenna
boresight, we obtain a phase
difference of
between port A and port B:
α
λ
π
ψ cos
2
d=
AeB jψ
=
Let compute
( )
2
cos
2
sin
2
cos2)sincos1(1:
ψψψ
ψψψ
AjAjAeBAS j






+=++=+=+=
( ) ( )
2
sin
2
sin
2
cos2)sincos1(1:
ψψψ
ψψψ
AjAjjAejBAjDj j






+=−−=−=−=






=
2
tan
ψ
SDj
84
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Transmitted RF signal (in phasor form) is ( ) ( )tpetS tj
Tr
RFω
=
p (t) - the pulse train function
At the front-end of the Antenna we receive a shifted and attenuated version of the
transmitted pulse:
( ) ( )
( )cRtpeVtS tj
cv
TRF
/2Re −= −ωω
ωRF - the RF angular velocity
ωT - the target’s Doppler shift
2 R/c time delay between transmission and reception
V – random complex voltage strength
c – velocity of light
We assume that from the Antenna emerge radar signal of the Sum S and
Difference D
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )cRtpFeVD
cRtpeVS
tj
tj
TRF
TRF
/2
/2
−∆=
−=
−
−
ψωω
ωω
85
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Receiver
The Superheterodyne Receiver translates the high RF frequency ωRF to a lower
frequency for a better processing.
This is done my mixing (nonlinear multiplication) the input frequency ωRF- ωT
with ωRF± ωIF to obtain ωIF - ωT
IF
Amp
IF
Amp
Band Pass
at IF
Band Pass
at IF
S
D
'D
'S
( ) tjst IFRF
eLO ωω ±
1
Mixer
Mixer
First Intemediate Frequaency (1st IF)
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )cRtpFeVD
cRtpeVS
tj
tj
TRF
TRF
/2
/2
−∆=
−=
−
−
ψωω
ωω
The Receiver translates the high RF frequency ωRF to a lower frequency to a
better processing. This is done my mixing (nonlinear multiplication) the input
frequency ωRF- ωT with ωRF± ωIF to obtain ωIF - ωT .
The IF signal is amplified and bandpass filtered to produce an output at IF frequency
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )cRtpFeVD
cRtpeVS
tj
tj
TIF
TIF
/2''
/2''
−∆=
−=
−
−
ψωω
ωω
If the mixing frequency is centered at ωRF± ωIF than the output is centered at
ωIF and at the image 2 ωRF± ωIF .
86
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Receiver (continue – 1)
A second mixing frequency is sometimes added to avoid potential problems with
image frequency.
IF
Amp
'S
''S
( ) tjnd IFIF
eLO ωω 2
2 ±
Mixer
Second Intemediate Frequaency (2nd IF)
IF
Amp
'D
''D
Mixer
Phase
Shifter
AGC
AGC
Band Pass
at 2nd IF
Band Pass
at 2nd IF
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )cRtpFeVD
cRtpeVS
tj
tj
TIF
TIF
/2"
/2"
2
2
−∆=
−=
−
−
ψ
ωω
ωω
The output of the Second Intermediate Frequency (2nd
IF)
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )cRtpFeVD
cRtpeVS
tj
tj
TIF
TIF
/2''
/2''
−∆=
−=
−
−
ψωω
ωω
87
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Receiver (continue – 2)
A second mixing frequency stage the signal consists of sinusoidals that possesses
an arbitrary phase relationship with respect to the radar’s phase reference.
"'IS
I/Q Detection
Video
Amplifier A/D
Mixer
Video
Amplifier A/D
Mixer
Video
Amplifier A/D
Mixer
Video
Amplifier A/D
Mixer
2/π
2/π
''S
''D
"'QS
"'Q
D
"'I
D "'ijI
D
"'ijQ
D
"'ijQS
"'ijI
S
tj IF
e 2ω−
[ ] ( )
[ ] ( )cRtpeVS
cRtpeVS
tj
Q
tj
I
T
T
/2"Im'"
/2"Re'"
−=
−=
ω
ω
For a coherent Doppler and
monopulse processing is
necessary to digitize the signal.
I/Q Detection
To find the phase and reduce
the signal frequency to Video
with two 2nd
IF signals at 90◦
(cos => I = in phase,
sin => Q = quadrature).
[ ] ( ) ( )
[ ] ( ) ( )cRtpFeVD
cRtpFeVD
tj
Q
tj
I
T
T
/2"Im'"
/2"Re'"
−∆=
−∆=
ψ
ψ
ω
ω
'"'"'" QI
SjSS +=
'"'"'" QI DjDD +=
88
SOLO Coherent Pulse Doppler Conceptual Operation
89
SOLO
Signal Processing
Range – Doppler Cells in Σ and ΔAz, ΔEl
After Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of the signals of the Batch in each Range Gate
we obtain Σ, ΔAz, ΔEl Rang-Doppler Maps.
90
SOLO
Signal Processing
Parameters of Σ , ΔAz, ΔEl Range – Doppler Maps
f
f
M
R
R
N
sunambiguousunambiguou
∆
=
∆
= &
The Parameters defining the Range – Doppler Maps are:
Δ R – Map Range Resolution
Δ f – Map Doppler Resolution
RUnambiguous – Unambiguous Range
fUnambiguous – Unambiguous Doppler
Range – Doppler
Cell
Range – Doppler
Map
Range Gates are therefore i = 1, 2, …, N
Number of Range-Doppler Cells = N x M
Doppler Gates are therefore j = 1, 2, …, M
Note: The Map Range & Doppler resolution (Δ R, Δ f) may change as function of
Seeker task (Search, Detection, Acquisition, Track). This is done by choosing
the Pulse Repetition Interval (PRI) and the number of pulses in a batch.
resolutionresolution ffRR ≥∆≥∆ &
91
SOLO Signal Processing
Generation of Σ , ΔAz, ΔEl Range – Doppler Maps (continue – 1)
( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( )ttTktttTkttfCts ddkdk
r
k
r
k ++≤≤++−= τθπ2cos
The received signal from the scatter k is:
Ck
r
– amplitude of received signal
td (t) – round trip delay time given by ( )
2/c
tRR
tt kk
d
+
=
θk – relative phase
The received signal is down-converted to base-band in order to extract the quadrature
components. More precisely sk
r
(t) is mixed with:
( ) [ ] τθπ +≤≤+= TktTktfCty kkk 2cos
After Low-Pass filtering the quadrature components of Σk, ΔAz k or ΔEl k signals are:
( ) ( )
( ) ( )





=
=
tAtx
tAtx
kkQk
kkIk
ψ
ψ
sin
cos
( ) ( ) 





+−≅−=
c
tR
c
R
fttft kk
kdkk
22
22 ππψ
The quadrature samples are given by:
( ) ( ) 











+−≅=
c
tR
c
R
fjAjAtX kk
kkkkk
22
2expexp πψ
Ak - amplitude of Σk, ΔAz k or ΔEl k signals
ψk - phase of Σk, ΔAz k or ΔEl k signals
( ) 











+−











+≅+=
c
tR
c
R
fAj
c
tR
c
R
fAxjxtX kk
kk
kk
kkQkIkk
 22
2sin
22
2cos ππ
92
SOLO Signal Processing
Generation of Σ , ΔAz, ΔEl Range – Doppler Maps (continue – 2)
The received signal from the scatter k is:
The energy of the received signal is given by: ( ) ( ) 2
kkkk AtXtXP ==
∗
( ) 











+−











+≅+=
c
tR
c
R
fAj
c
tR
c
R
fAxjxtX kk
kk
kk
kkQkIkk
 22
2sin
22
2cos ππ
where * is the complex conjugate.
Therefore:
kk PA =
93
94
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
References on RADAR
Skolnik, M.I., “Introduction to Radar Systems”, McGraw Hill, 1962
Scheer, J.A., Kurtz, J.L., Ed., “Coherent Radar Performance Estimation”,
Artech House, 1993
Schleher, D.C., “MTI and Pulsed Doppler Radar”, Artech House, 1991
Barton, D.K., Ward, H.R., “Handbook of Radar Measurements”, Artech House, 19
Morris, G.V., “Airborne Pulse Radar”, Artech House, 2nd
Ed., 19
Maksimov, M.V., Gorgonov, G.I., “Electronic Homing Systems”,
Artech House, 19
Wehner, D.R., “High Resolution Radar”, Artech House, 19
Hovanessian, S.A., “Introduction to Sensor Systems”, Artech House, 19
Barton, D.K., “Modern Radar System Analysis”, Artech House, 19
Berkowitz, R.S., “Modern Radar Analysis, Evaluation and System Design”,
John Wiley & Sons, 1965
95
SOLO
Technion
Israeli Institute of Technology
1964 – 1968 BSc EE
1968 – 1971 MSc EE
Israeli Air Force
1970 – 1974
RAFAEL
Israeli Armament Development Authority
1974 – 2013
Stanford University
1983 – 1986 PhD AA
96
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Chinese Remainder Theorem
The original form of the theorem, contained
in a third-century AD book by Chinese
mathematician Sun Tzu and later republished
in a 1247 book by Qin Jiushao.
Suppose n1, n2, …, nk are integers which are
pairwise coprime. Then, for any given
integers a1,a2, …, ak, there exists an integer x
solving the system
1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2
1 2
0
0
0
, , , integers
k k k k k
k
x n t a n a
x n t a n a
x n t a n a
t t t are
≡ + > >
≡ + > >
≡ + > >
L L L L L
L
or in modern notation
( )mod 1,2, ,i ix a n i k≡ = L ai is the reminder of x : ni
x
97
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Chinese Remainder Theorem (continue – 1)
A Constructive Solution to Find x
( )mod 1,2, ,i ix a n i k≡ = L
x
Define 1 2: kN n n n= L
For each i, ni and N/ni are coprime.
Using the extended Eulerian
algorithm we can therefore find
integers ri and si such that
( )/ 1i i i irn s N n+ =
Define
Therefore ei divided by ni has the remainder 1 and divided by nj (j≠i) has the remainder 0,
because of the definition of N.
( ): / 1i i i i ie s N n rn= = −
( ) ( )1 mod 0 modi i i je n and e n i j= = ∀ ≠
Because of this the solution is of the form
1
k
i i
i
x a e
=
= ∑ But also ( )
1
mod
k
i i
i
a e x N
=
=∑
98
Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO
Chinese Remainder Theorem (continue – 2)
A Constructive Solution to Find x (Example)
( )mod 1,2, ,i ix a n i k≡ = L
1 2 3: 60N n n n= × =
( )
( )
( )
2 mod 3 ,
3 mod 4 ,
1 mod 5 .
x
x
x
≡
≡
≡
1 2 33, 4, 5n n n= = =
1 2 3/ 20, / 15, / 12N n N n N n= = =
( ){ { { {
11 1
1
/
13 3 2 20 1
sn N n
r
 
− + = ÷
 
( ){ { { {
2 2 2
2
/
11 4 3 15 1
n s N n
r
 
− + = ÷
 
( ){ { ( ){ {
33
3 3
/
5 5 2 12 1
N nn
r s
 
+ − = ÷
 
( ): /i i ie s N n= ( )1 : 2 20 40e = = ( )2 : 3 15 45e = = ( )3 : 2 12 24e = − = −
1 2 32, 3, 1a a a= = =
( )1 1 2 2 3 3 2 40 3 45 1 24 191x a e a e a e= + + = × + × + × − =
Check:
191 63 3 2 47 4 3 38 5 1= × + = × + = × +
( )/ 1i i i irn s N n+ =Find ri and si such that:
Compute:
Therefore:
and ( )11 191 11 mod 60x N= ¬ = =
11 3 3 2 2 4 3 2 5 1= × + = × + = × +
99
100
101
102
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Continuous Wave (CW)
103
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Continuous Wave (CW)
104
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Continuous Wave (CW)
105
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Continuous Wave (CW)
106
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Continuous Wave (CW)
107
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Continuous Wave (CW)
108
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Continuous Wave (CW)
109
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Continuous Wave (CW)
110
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Continuous Wave (CW)
111
112
SOLO
Waveform Hierarchy
• Steped Frequency Waveform (SFWF)
3–4GHz
6–7GHz
3GHz
4GHz
3–4GHz

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

5 pulse compression waveform
5 pulse compression waveform5 pulse compression waveform
5 pulse compression waveformSolo Hermelin
 
Radar fundamentals
Radar fundamentalsRadar fundamentals
Radar fundamentalsAli Sufyan
 
Chapter 3- pulsed radar system and MTI
Chapter 3- pulsed radar system and MTIChapter 3- pulsed radar system and MTI
Chapter 3- pulsed radar system and MTIRima Assaf
 
Radar Systems- Unit-III : MTI and Pulse Doppler Radars
Radar Systems- Unit-III : MTI and Pulse Doppler RadarsRadar Systems- Unit-III : MTI and Pulse Doppler Radars
Radar Systems- Unit-III : MTI and Pulse Doppler RadarsVenkataRatnam14
 
Synthetic aperture radar
Synthetic aperture radarSynthetic aperture radar
Synthetic aperture radarMahesh pawar
 
Radar Systems- Unit-II : CW and Frequency Modulated Radar
Radar Systems- Unit-II : CW and Frequency Modulated RadarRadar Systems- Unit-II : CW and Frequency Modulated Radar
Radar Systems- Unit-II : CW and Frequency Modulated RadarVenkataRatnam14
 
Radar 2009 a 13 clutter rejection doppler filtering
Radar 2009 a 13 clutter rejection   doppler filteringRadar 2009 a 13 clutter rejection   doppler filtering
Radar 2009 a 13 clutter rejection doppler filteringForward2025
 
Radar Systems- Unit- I : Basics of Radar
Radar Systems- Unit- I : Basics of Radar Radar Systems- Unit- I : Basics of Radar
Radar Systems- Unit- I : Basics of Radar VenkataRatnam14
 
Radar Systems -Unit- I : Radar Equation
Radar Systems -Unit- I : Radar Equation Radar Systems -Unit- I : Radar Equation
Radar Systems -Unit- I : Radar Equation VenkataRatnam14
 
radar-principles
radar-principlesradar-principles
radar-principlesjhcid
 
Introduction to radar
Introduction to radarIntroduction to radar
Introduction to radarUlsah T N
 
Link budget calculation
Link budget calculationLink budget calculation
Link budget calculationsitimunirah88
 
Radar communication 2
Radar communication 2Radar communication 2
Radar communication 2Ashwani Kumar
 
A Tutorial on Radar System Engineering
A Tutorial on Radar System EngineeringA Tutorial on Radar System Engineering
A Tutorial on Radar System EngineeringTBSS Group
 

Mais procurados (20)

5 pulse compression waveform
5 pulse compression waveform5 pulse compression waveform
5 pulse compression waveform
 
Radar fundamentals
Radar fundamentalsRadar fundamentals
Radar fundamentals
 
Chapter 3- pulsed radar system and MTI
Chapter 3- pulsed radar system and MTIChapter 3- pulsed radar system and MTI
Chapter 3- pulsed radar system and MTI
 
Radar Systems- Unit-III : MTI and Pulse Doppler Radars
Radar Systems- Unit-III : MTI and Pulse Doppler RadarsRadar Systems- Unit-III : MTI and Pulse Doppler Radars
Radar Systems- Unit-III : MTI and Pulse Doppler Radars
 
Cw and fm cw radar
Cw and fm cw radarCw and fm cw radar
Cw and fm cw radar
 
Synthetic aperture radar
Synthetic aperture radarSynthetic aperture radar
Synthetic aperture radar
 
Radar Systems- Unit-II : CW and Frequency Modulated Radar
Radar Systems- Unit-II : CW and Frequency Modulated RadarRadar Systems- Unit-II : CW and Frequency Modulated Radar
Radar Systems- Unit-II : CW and Frequency Modulated Radar
 
Radar
RadarRadar
Radar
 
Radar 2009 a 13 clutter rejection doppler filtering
Radar 2009 a 13 clutter rejection   doppler filteringRadar 2009 a 13 clutter rejection   doppler filtering
Radar 2009 a 13 clutter rejection doppler filtering
 
Radar Systems- Unit- I : Basics of Radar
Radar Systems- Unit- I : Basics of Radar Radar Systems- Unit- I : Basics of Radar
Radar Systems- Unit- I : Basics of Radar
 
Radar Systems -Unit- I : Radar Equation
Radar Systems -Unit- I : Radar Equation Radar Systems -Unit- I : Radar Equation
Radar Systems -Unit- I : Radar Equation
 
radar basics
radar basicsradar basics
radar basics
 
Sar
SarSar
Sar
 
Radar
RadarRadar
Radar
 
radar-principles
radar-principlesradar-principles
radar-principles
 
CFAR
CFARCFAR
CFAR
 
Introduction to radar
Introduction to radarIntroduction to radar
Introduction to radar
 
Link budget calculation
Link budget calculationLink budget calculation
Link budget calculation
 
Radar communication 2
Radar communication 2Radar communication 2
Radar communication 2
 
A Tutorial on Radar System Engineering
A Tutorial on Radar System EngineeringA Tutorial on Radar System Engineering
A Tutorial on Radar System Engineering
 

Semelhante a Range & Doppler measurements using RADAR systems

4 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals
4 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals4 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals
4 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signalsSolo Hermelin
 
4 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals-2
4 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals-24 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals-2
4 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals-2Solo Hermelin
 
6 radar range-doppler-angular loops
6 radar range-doppler-angular loops6 radar range-doppler-angular loops
6 radar range-doppler-angular loopsSolo Hermelin
 
Spacecraft RF Communications Course Sampler
Spacecraft RF Communications Course SamplerSpacecraft RF Communications Course Sampler
Spacecraft RF Communications Course SamplerJim Jenkins
 
eecs242_lect3_rxarch.pdf
eecs242_lect3_rxarch.pdfeecs242_lect3_rxarch.pdf
eecs242_lect3_rxarch.pdfNahshonMObiri
 
chap4_lec1.ppt Engineering and technical
chap4_lec1.ppt Engineering and technicalchap4_lec1.ppt Engineering and technical
chap4_lec1.ppt Engineering and technicalshreenathji26
 
Differential Distributed Space-Time Coding with Imperfect Synchronization in ...
Differential Distributed Space-Time Coding with Imperfect Synchronization in ...Differential Distributed Space-Time Coding with Imperfect Synchronization in ...
Differential Distributed Space-Time Coding with Imperfect Synchronization in ...mravendi
 
Characterization of the Wireless Channel
Characterization of the Wireless ChannelCharacterization of the Wireless Channel
Characterization of the Wireless ChannelSuraj Katwal
 
A Simple Communication System Design Lab #3 with MATLAB Simulink
A Simple Communication System Design Lab #3 with MATLAB SimulinkA Simple Communication System Design Lab #3 with MATLAB Simulink
A Simple Communication System Design Lab #3 with MATLAB SimulinkJaewook. Kang
 
Time reversed acoustics - Mathias Fink
Time reversed acoustics - Mathias FinkTime reversed acoustics - Mathias Fink
Time reversed acoustics - Mathias FinkSébastien Popoff
 
Ch4 2 _fm modulator and demodulator15
Ch4 2 _fm modulator and demodulator15Ch4 2 _fm modulator and demodulator15
Ch4 2 _fm modulator and demodulator15Jyothirmaye Suneel
 
Wideband Frequency Modulation.pdf
Wideband Frequency Modulation.pdfWideband Frequency Modulation.pdf
Wideband Frequency Modulation.pdfArijitDhali
 
Linear transformation.ppt
Linear transformation.pptLinear transformation.ppt
Linear transformation.pptRaj Parekh
 
synthetic aperture radar
synthetic aperture radarsynthetic aperture radar
synthetic aperture radarAmit Rastogi
 
AM - Modulator and Demodulator
AM - Modulator and DemodulatorAM - Modulator and Demodulator
AM - Modulator and DemodulatorKannanKrishnana
 

Semelhante a Range & Doppler measurements using RADAR systems (20)

4 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals
4 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals4 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals
4 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals
 
Doppler radar
Doppler radarDoppler radar
Doppler radar
 
4 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals-2
4 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals-24 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals-2
4 matched filters and ambiguity functions for radar signals-2
 
6 radar range-doppler-angular loops
6 radar range-doppler-angular loops6 radar range-doppler-angular loops
6 radar range-doppler-angular loops
 
Spacecraft RF Communications Course Sampler
Spacecraft RF Communications Course SamplerSpacecraft RF Communications Course Sampler
Spacecraft RF Communications Course Sampler
 
eecs242_lect3_rxarch.pdf
eecs242_lect3_rxarch.pdfeecs242_lect3_rxarch.pdf
eecs242_lect3_rxarch.pdf
 
Signal & system
Signal & systemSignal & system
Signal & system
 
Chapter 2
Chapter 2Chapter 2
Chapter 2
 
Chapter 2
Chapter 2Chapter 2
Chapter 2
 
chap4_lec1.ppt Engineering and technical
chap4_lec1.ppt Engineering and technicalchap4_lec1.ppt Engineering and technical
chap4_lec1.ppt Engineering and technical
 
Kanal wireless dan propagasi
Kanal wireless dan propagasiKanal wireless dan propagasi
Kanal wireless dan propagasi
 
Differential Distributed Space-Time Coding with Imperfect Synchronization in ...
Differential Distributed Space-Time Coding with Imperfect Synchronization in ...Differential Distributed Space-Time Coding with Imperfect Synchronization in ...
Differential Distributed Space-Time Coding with Imperfect Synchronization in ...
 
Characterization of the Wireless Channel
Characterization of the Wireless ChannelCharacterization of the Wireless Channel
Characterization of the Wireless Channel
 
A Simple Communication System Design Lab #3 with MATLAB Simulink
A Simple Communication System Design Lab #3 with MATLAB SimulinkA Simple Communication System Design Lab #3 with MATLAB Simulink
A Simple Communication System Design Lab #3 with MATLAB Simulink
 
Time reversed acoustics - Mathias Fink
Time reversed acoustics - Mathias FinkTime reversed acoustics - Mathias Fink
Time reversed acoustics - Mathias Fink
 
Ch4 2 _fm modulator and demodulator15
Ch4 2 _fm modulator and demodulator15Ch4 2 _fm modulator and demodulator15
Ch4 2 _fm modulator and demodulator15
 
Wideband Frequency Modulation.pdf
Wideband Frequency Modulation.pdfWideband Frequency Modulation.pdf
Wideband Frequency Modulation.pdf
 
Linear transformation.ppt
Linear transformation.pptLinear transformation.ppt
Linear transformation.ppt
 
synthetic aperture radar
synthetic aperture radarsynthetic aperture radar
synthetic aperture radar
 
AM - Modulator and Demodulator
AM - Modulator and DemodulatorAM - Modulator and Demodulator
AM - Modulator and Demodulator
 

Mais de Solo Hermelin

5 introduction to quantum mechanics
5 introduction to quantum mechanics5 introduction to quantum mechanics
5 introduction to quantum mechanicsSolo Hermelin
 
Stabilization of linear time invariant systems, Factorization Approach
Stabilization of linear time invariant systems, Factorization ApproachStabilization of linear time invariant systems, Factorization Approach
Stabilization of linear time invariant systems, Factorization ApproachSolo Hermelin
 
Slide Mode Control (S.M.C.)
Slide Mode Control (S.M.C.)Slide Mode Control (S.M.C.)
Slide Mode Control (S.M.C.)Solo Hermelin
 
Sliding Mode Observers
Sliding Mode ObserversSliding Mode Observers
Sliding Mode ObserversSolo Hermelin
 
Reduced order observers
Reduced order observersReduced order observers
Reduced order observersSolo Hermelin
 
Inner outer and spectral factorizations
Inner outer and spectral factorizationsInner outer and spectral factorizations
Inner outer and spectral factorizationsSolo Hermelin
 
Keplerian trajectories
Keplerian trajectoriesKeplerian trajectories
Keplerian trajectoriesSolo Hermelin
 
Anti ballistic missiles ii
Anti ballistic missiles iiAnti ballistic missiles ii
Anti ballistic missiles iiSolo Hermelin
 
Anti ballistic missiles i
Anti ballistic missiles iAnti ballistic missiles i
Anti ballistic missiles iSolo Hermelin
 
12 performance of an aircraft with parabolic polar
12 performance of an aircraft with parabolic polar12 performance of an aircraft with parabolic polar
12 performance of an aircraft with parabolic polarSolo Hermelin
 
11 fighter aircraft avionics - part iv
11 fighter aircraft avionics - part iv11 fighter aircraft avionics - part iv
11 fighter aircraft avionics - part ivSolo Hermelin
 
10 fighter aircraft avionics - part iii
10 fighter aircraft avionics - part iii10 fighter aircraft avionics - part iii
10 fighter aircraft avionics - part iiiSolo Hermelin
 
9 fighter aircraft avionics-part ii
9 fighter aircraft avionics-part ii9 fighter aircraft avionics-part ii
9 fighter aircraft avionics-part iiSolo Hermelin
 
8 fighter aircraft avionics-part i
8 fighter aircraft avionics-part i8 fighter aircraft avionics-part i
8 fighter aircraft avionics-part iSolo Hermelin
 
6 computing gunsight, hud and hms
6 computing gunsight, hud and hms6 computing gunsight, hud and hms
6 computing gunsight, hud and hmsSolo Hermelin
 
4 navigation systems
4 navigation systems4 navigation systems
4 navigation systemsSolo Hermelin
 
2 aircraft flight instruments
2 aircraft flight instruments2 aircraft flight instruments
2 aircraft flight instrumentsSolo Hermelin
 
3 modern aircraft cutaway
3 modern aircraft cutaway3 modern aircraft cutaway
3 modern aircraft cutawaySolo Hermelin
 

Mais de Solo Hermelin (20)

5 introduction to quantum mechanics
5 introduction to quantum mechanics5 introduction to quantum mechanics
5 introduction to quantum mechanics
 
Stabilization of linear time invariant systems, Factorization Approach
Stabilization of linear time invariant systems, Factorization ApproachStabilization of linear time invariant systems, Factorization Approach
Stabilization of linear time invariant systems, Factorization Approach
 
Slide Mode Control (S.M.C.)
Slide Mode Control (S.M.C.)Slide Mode Control (S.M.C.)
Slide Mode Control (S.M.C.)
 
Sliding Mode Observers
Sliding Mode ObserversSliding Mode Observers
Sliding Mode Observers
 
Reduced order observers
Reduced order observersReduced order observers
Reduced order observers
 
Inner outer and spectral factorizations
Inner outer and spectral factorizationsInner outer and spectral factorizations
Inner outer and spectral factorizations
 
Keplerian trajectories
Keplerian trajectoriesKeplerian trajectories
Keplerian trajectories
 
Anti ballistic missiles ii
Anti ballistic missiles iiAnti ballistic missiles ii
Anti ballistic missiles ii
 
Anti ballistic missiles i
Anti ballistic missiles iAnti ballistic missiles i
Anti ballistic missiles i
 
Analytic dynamics
Analytic dynamicsAnalytic dynamics
Analytic dynamics
 
12 performance of an aircraft with parabolic polar
12 performance of an aircraft with parabolic polar12 performance of an aircraft with parabolic polar
12 performance of an aircraft with parabolic polar
 
11 fighter aircraft avionics - part iv
11 fighter aircraft avionics - part iv11 fighter aircraft avionics - part iv
11 fighter aircraft avionics - part iv
 
10 fighter aircraft avionics - part iii
10 fighter aircraft avionics - part iii10 fighter aircraft avionics - part iii
10 fighter aircraft avionics - part iii
 
9 fighter aircraft avionics-part ii
9 fighter aircraft avionics-part ii9 fighter aircraft avionics-part ii
9 fighter aircraft avionics-part ii
 
8 fighter aircraft avionics-part i
8 fighter aircraft avionics-part i8 fighter aircraft avionics-part i
8 fighter aircraft avionics-part i
 
6 computing gunsight, hud and hms
6 computing gunsight, hud and hms6 computing gunsight, hud and hms
6 computing gunsight, hud and hms
 
4 navigation systems
4 navigation systems4 navigation systems
4 navigation systems
 
3 earth atmosphere
3 earth atmosphere3 earth atmosphere
3 earth atmosphere
 
2 aircraft flight instruments
2 aircraft flight instruments2 aircraft flight instruments
2 aircraft flight instruments
 
3 modern aircraft cutaway
3 modern aircraft cutaway3 modern aircraft cutaway
3 modern aircraft cutaway
 

Último

FREE NURSING BUNDLE FOR NURSES.PDF by na
FREE NURSING BUNDLE FOR NURSES.PDF by naFREE NURSING BUNDLE FOR NURSES.PDF by na
FREE NURSING BUNDLE FOR NURSES.PDF by naJASISJULIANOELYNV
 
《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》
《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》
《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》rnrncn29
 
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.pptTransposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.pptArshadWarsi13
 
Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...
Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...
Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...lizamodels9
 
Environmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial Biosensor
Environmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial BiosensorEnvironmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial Biosensor
Environmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial Biosensorsonawaneprad
 
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyayCitronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyayupadhyaymani499
 
Call Girls In Nihal Vihar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Looking Escorts In 24/7 Delhi NCR
Call Girls In Nihal Vihar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Looking Escorts In 24/7 Delhi NCRCall Girls In Nihal Vihar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Looking Escorts In 24/7 Delhi NCR
Call Girls In Nihal Vihar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Looking Escorts In 24/7 Delhi NCRlizamodels9
 
The dark energy paradox leads to a new structure of spacetime.pptx
The dark energy paradox leads to a new structure of spacetime.pptxThe dark energy paradox leads to a new structure of spacetime.pptx
The dark energy paradox leads to a new structure of spacetime.pptxEran Akiva Sinbar
 
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather StationUser Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather StationColumbia Weather Systems
 
Pests of Blackgram, greengram, cowpea_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of Blackgram, greengram, cowpea_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of Blackgram, greengram, cowpea_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of Blackgram, greengram, cowpea_Dr.UPR.pdfPirithiRaju
 
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...Universidade Federal de Sergipe - UFS
 
RESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptx
RESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptxRESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptx
RESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptxFarihaAbdulRasheed
 
Topic 9- General Principles of International Law.pptx
Topic 9- General Principles of International Law.pptxTopic 9- General Principles of International Law.pptx
Topic 9- General Principles of International Law.pptxJorenAcuavera1
 
Harmful and Useful Microorganisms Presentation
Harmful and Useful Microorganisms PresentationHarmful and Useful Microorganisms Presentation
Harmful and Useful Microorganisms Presentationtahreemzahra82
 
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...Universidade Federal de Sergipe - UFS
 
Pests of soyabean_Binomics_IdentificationDr.UPR.pdf
Pests of soyabean_Binomics_IdentificationDr.UPR.pdfPests of soyabean_Binomics_IdentificationDr.UPR.pdf
Pests of soyabean_Binomics_IdentificationDr.UPR.pdfPirithiRaju
 
Behavioral Disorder: Schizophrenia & it's Case Study.pdf
Behavioral Disorder: Schizophrenia & it's Case Study.pdfBehavioral Disorder: Schizophrenia & it's Case Study.pdf
Behavioral Disorder: Schizophrenia & it's Case Study.pdfSELF-EXPLANATORY
 
Good agricultural practices 3rd year bpharm. herbal drug technology .pptx
Good agricultural practices 3rd year bpharm. herbal drug technology .pptxGood agricultural practices 3rd year bpharm. herbal drug technology .pptx
Good agricultural practices 3rd year bpharm. herbal drug technology .pptxSimeonChristian
 
Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024
Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024
Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024AyushiRastogi48
 
Microteaching on terms used in filtration .Pharmaceutical Engineering
Microteaching on terms used in filtration .Pharmaceutical EngineeringMicroteaching on terms used in filtration .Pharmaceutical Engineering
Microteaching on terms used in filtration .Pharmaceutical EngineeringPrajakta Shinde
 

Último (20)

FREE NURSING BUNDLE FOR NURSES.PDF by na
FREE NURSING BUNDLE FOR NURSES.PDF by naFREE NURSING BUNDLE FOR NURSES.PDF by na
FREE NURSING BUNDLE FOR NURSES.PDF by na
 
《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》
《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》
《Queensland毕业文凭-昆士兰大学毕业证成绩单》
 
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.pptTransposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
 
Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...
Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...
Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...
 
Environmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial Biosensor
Environmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial BiosensorEnvironmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial Biosensor
Environmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial Biosensor
 
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyayCitronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
 
Call Girls In Nihal Vihar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Looking Escorts In 24/7 Delhi NCR
Call Girls In Nihal Vihar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Looking Escorts In 24/7 Delhi NCRCall Girls In Nihal Vihar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Looking Escorts In 24/7 Delhi NCR
Call Girls In Nihal Vihar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Looking Escorts In 24/7 Delhi NCR
 
The dark energy paradox leads to a new structure of spacetime.pptx
The dark energy paradox leads to a new structure of spacetime.pptxThe dark energy paradox leads to a new structure of spacetime.pptx
The dark energy paradox leads to a new structure of spacetime.pptx
 
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather StationUser Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
 
Pests of Blackgram, greengram, cowpea_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of Blackgram, greengram, cowpea_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of Blackgram, greengram, cowpea_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of Blackgram, greengram, cowpea_Dr.UPR.pdf
 
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
 
RESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptx
RESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptxRESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptx
RESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptx
 
Topic 9- General Principles of International Law.pptx
Topic 9- General Principles of International Law.pptxTopic 9- General Principles of International Law.pptx
Topic 9- General Principles of International Law.pptx
 
Harmful and Useful Microorganisms Presentation
Harmful and Useful Microorganisms PresentationHarmful and Useful Microorganisms Presentation
Harmful and Useful Microorganisms Presentation
 
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
 
Pests of soyabean_Binomics_IdentificationDr.UPR.pdf
Pests of soyabean_Binomics_IdentificationDr.UPR.pdfPests of soyabean_Binomics_IdentificationDr.UPR.pdf
Pests of soyabean_Binomics_IdentificationDr.UPR.pdf
 
Behavioral Disorder: Schizophrenia & it's Case Study.pdf
Behavioral Disorder: Schizophrenia & it's Case Study.pdfBehavioral Disorder: Schizophrenia & it's Case Study.pdf
Behavioral Disorder: Schizophrenia & it's Case Study.pdf
 
Good agricultural practices 3rd year bpharm. herbal drug technology .pptx
Good agricultural practices 3rd year bpharm. herbal drug technology .pptxGood agricultural practices 3rd year bpharm. herbal drug technology .pptx
Good agricultural practices 3rd year bpharm. herbal drug technology .pptx
 
Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024
Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024
Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024
 
Microteaching on terms used in filtration .Pharmaceutical Engineering
Microteaching on terms used in filtration .Pharmaceutical EngineeringMicroteaching on terms used in filtration .Pharmaceutical Engineering
Microteaching on terms used in filtration .Pharmaceutical Engineering
 

Range & Doppler measurements using RADAR systems

  • 1. 1 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR Systems SOLO HERMELIN Updated: 09.10.08 http://www.solohermelin.com
  • 2. 2 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Table of Contents RADAR RF Signal Radar Signals Waveform Hierarchy Doppler Effect due to Target Motion .( )0≠R Continuous Wave Radar (CW Radar) Basic CW Radar Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Linear Sawtooth Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave Sinusoidal Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave Multiple Frequency CW Radar (MFCW) Phase Modulated Continuous Wave (PMCW)
  • 3. 3 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Table of Contents (continue – 1) Pulse Waves Pulse Compression Techniques Stepped Frequency Waveform (SFWF) Phase Coding Resolution Range Measurement Unambiguity Unambiguous Range and Velocity Coherent Pulse Doppler Radar
  • 4. 4 RADAR RF SignalsSOLO The transmitted RADAR RF Signal is: ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]ttftEtEt 0000 2cos ϕπ += E0 – amplitude of the signal f0 – RF frequency of the signal φ0 –phase of the signal (possible modulated) The returned signal is delayed by the time that takes to signal to reach the target and to return back to the receiver. Since the electromagnetic waves travel with the speed of light c (much greater then RADAR and Target velocities), the received signal is delayed by c RR td 21 + ≅ The received signal is: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( )tnoisettttfttEtE dddr +−+−−= ϕπα 00 2cos To retrieve the range (and range-rate) information from the received signal the transmitted signal must be modulated in Amplitude or/and Frequency or/and Phase. ά < 1 represents the attenuation of the signal
  • 5. 5 SOLO The received signal is: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( )tnoisettttfttEtE dddr +−+−−= ϕπα 00 2cos ( ) ( ) tRRtRtRRtR ⋅+=⋅+= 222111 &  We want to compute the delay time td due to the time td1 it takes the EM-wave to reach the target at a distance R1 (at t=0), from the transmitter, and to the time td2 it takes the EM-wave to return to the receiver, at a distance R2 (at t=0) from the target. 21 ddd ttt += According to the Special Relativity Theory the EM wave will travel with a constant velocity c (independent of the relative velocities ).21 & RR  The EM wave that reached the target at time t was send at td1 ,therefore ( ) ( ) 111111 ddd tcttRRttR ⋅=−⋅+=−  ( ) 1 11 1 Rc tRR ttd   + ⋅+ = In the same way the EM wave received from the target at time t was reflected at td2 , therefore ( ) ( ) 222222 ddd tcttRRttR ⋅=−⋅+=−  ( ) 2 22 2 Rc tRR ttd   + ⋅+ = RADAR RF Signals
  • 6. 6 SOLO The received signal is: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( )tnoisettttfttEtE dddr +−+−−= ϕπα 00 2cos 21 ddd ttt += ( ) 1 11 1 Rc tRR ttd   + ⋅+ = ( ) 2 22 2 Rc tRR ttd   + ⋅+ = ( ) ( ) 2 22 1 11 21 Rc tRR Rc tRR tttttttt ddd     + ⋅+ − + ⋅+ −=−−=−       + − + − +      + − + − =− 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 Rc R t Rc Rc Rc R t Rc Rc tt d     From which: or: Since in most applications we can approximate where they appear in the arguments of E0 (t-td), φ (t-td), however, because f0 is of order of 109 Hz=1 GHz, in radar applications, we must use: cRR <<21,  1, 2 2 1 1 ≈ + − + − Rc Rc Rc Rc     ( )         −⋅           ++      −⋅           +=      −⋅      −⋅+      −⋅      −⋅≈− 2 . 201 . 10 22 0 11 00 2 1 2 1 2 12 1 2 12 1 21 D Ralong FreqDoppler DD Ralong FreqDoppler Dd ttffttff c R t c R f c R t c R fttf  ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( )tnoisettttffttEtE ddDdr +−+−⋅+−≈ ϕπα 00 2cos where 21 2 2 1 121 2 02 1 01 ,,,, 2 , 2 dddddDDDDD ttt c R t c R tfff c R ff c R ff +=≈≈+=−≈−≈  Finally Doppler Effect RADAR RF Signals
  • 7. 7 SOLO The received signal model: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( )tnoisettttffttEtE ddDdr +−+−⋅+−≈ ϕπα 00 2cos Delayed by two- way trip time Scaled down Amplitude Possible phase modulated Corrupted By noise Doppler effect We want to estimate: • delay td range c td/2 • amplitude reduction α • Doppler frequency fD • noise power n (relative to signal power) • phase modulation φ Table of Content RADAR RF Signals
  • 8. 8 RADAR SignalsSOLO Waveforms ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tttats θω += 0cos a (t) – nonnegative function that represents any amplitude modulation (AM) θ (t) – phase angle associated with any frequency modulation (FM) ω0 – nominal carrier angular frequency ω0 = 2 π f0 f0 – nominal carrier frequency Transmitted Signal ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]{ }ttjtats θω += 0exp Phasor (complex, analytic) Transmitted Signal
  • 9. 9 RADAR SignalsSOLO Quadrature Form ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( )tttattta tttats 00 0 sinsincoscos cos ωθωθ θω −= += where: ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]ttats ttats Q I θ θ sin cos = = ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )ttsttsts QI 00 sincos ωω −= One other form: ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( ) ( ) [ ]tjtjtjtj ee ta tttats θωθω θω −−+ +=+= 00 2 cos 0 ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tjtj etgetgts 00 * 2 1 ωω − += ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )tj QI etatsjtstg θ =+=: Complex envelope
  • 10. 10 RADAR SignalsSOLO Spectrum Define the Fourier Transfer F ( ) ( ){ } ( ) ( )∫ +∞ ∞− −== dttjtstsS ωω exp:F ( ) ( ){ } ( ) ( )∫ +∞ ∞− == π ω ωωω 2 exp: d tjSSts -1 F ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tjtj etgetgts 00 * 2 1 ωω − += ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]0 * 0 2 1 ωωωωω −−+−= GGS-1 F F -1 F F ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )tj QI etatsjtstg θ =+=: ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tttats θω += 0cos Inverse Fourier Transfer F -1 Complex envelope
  • 11. 11 RADAR SignalsSOLO Energy ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tttats θω += 0cos ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]{ } ( )∫∫∫ +∞ ∞− +∞ ∞− +∞ ∞− ≈++== dttadttttadttsEs 2 0 22 2 1 22cos1 2 1 : θω Parseval’s Formula Proof: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )∫∫ +∞ ∞− +∞ ∞− = ωωω π dFFdttftf 2 * 12 * 1 2 1 ( ) ( ) ( )∫ +∞ ∞− −= dttjtfF ωω exp11 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )∫∫ ∫∫ ∫∫ +∞ ∞− +∞ ∞− +∞ ∞− +∞ ∞− +∞ ∞− +∞ ∞− =−=−= π ω ωω π ω ωω π ω ωω 22 exp 2 exp 2 * 112 * 2 * 12 * 1 d FF d dttjtfFdt d tjFtfdttftf ( ) ( ) ( )∫ +∞ ∞− −= π ω ωω 2 exp * 2 * 2 d tjFtf If s (t) is real, than s (t) = s*(t) and ( ) ( ) ( )∫∫∫ +∞ ∞− +∞ ∞− +∞ ∞− === ωω π dSdttsdttsEs 222 2 1 :
  • 12. 12 RADAR SignalsSOLO Energy (continue – 1) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tttats θω += 0cos ( ) ( ) ( )∫∫∫ +∞ ∞− +∞ ∞− +∞ ∞− === ωω π dSdttsdttsEs 222 2 1 : ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )       −−−+−−−+ −−−−+−− = −−+−−−+−= − −− 00 0000 0 * 0 *2 00 0 * 00 * 0 00 * 0 * 0 * 4 1 4 1 ϕϕ ϕϕϕϕ ωωωωωωωω ωωωωωωωω ωωωωωωωωωω jj jjjj eGGeGG GGGG eGeGeGeGSS For finite band signals (see Figure) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )∫∫∫ ∫∫ ∞+ ∞− ∞+ ∞− ∞+ ∞− +∞ ∞− − +∞ ∞− =−−−−=−− ≈−−−=−−− ωωωωωωωωωωωωω ωωωωωωωωωω ϕϕ dGGdGGdGG deGGdeGG jj * 0 * 00 * 0 2 0 * 0 *2 00 000 ( ) ( )∫∫ +∞ ∞− +∞ ∞− ≈= ωω π ωω π dGdSEs 22 2 1 2 1 2 1 : Table of Content
  • 13. 13 SOLO Waveform Hierarchy Radar Waveforms CW Radars Pulsed Radars Frequency Modulated CW Phase Modulated CW bi – phase & poly-phase Linear FMCW Sawtooth, or Triangle Nonlinear FMCW Sinusoidal, Multiple Frequency, Noise, Pseudorandom Intra-pulse Modulation Pulse-to-pulse Modulation, Frequency Agility Stepped Frequency Frequency Modulate Linear FM Nonlinear FM Phase Modulated bi – phase poly-phase Unmodulated CW Multiple Frequency Frequency Shift Keying Fixed Frequency
  • 14. 14 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO ( )tf 2 τ 2 τ − A ∞→t 2 τ +T 2 τ −T A 2 τ +−T 2 τ −−T A t←∞− T T A t A t A LINEAR FM PULSECODED PULSE T T PULSED (INTRAPULSE CODING) t ( )tf A 2 τ 2 τ −T AA T T A 2 2 τ +T 2 2 τ −T A T T A 2 τ − 2 τ +T TN t ( )tf A 2 τ 2 τ −T AA T T A 2 2 τ +T 2 2 τ −T A T T A 2 τ − 2 τ +T TN PHASE CODED PULSES HOPPED FREQUENCY PULSES PULSED (INTERPULSE CODING) t ( )tf A T 2/τ− LOW PRF MEDIUM PRF PULSED ( )tf T T T T 2/τ+ τ HIGH PRF T T T T A Partial List of the Family of RADAR Waveforms
  • 15. 15 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Radar Waveforms and their Fourier Transforms
  • 16. 16 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Radar Waveforms and their Fourier Transforms
  • 17. 17 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Table of Content
  • 18. 18 Doppler Effect due to Target Motion . SOLO ΔT – time from point A to travel from radar to target at range R0 (at transmission time t0) is c TRR T ∆+ =∆  0 Rc R T − =∆ 0 Total round-trip is 2ΔT . Therefore point A returns to radar at Rc R TT − += 0 01 2 Point B returns to radar at Rc R TTT RF − ++= 1 02 2 where and RFRF RF f T ω π21 == RFTRRR += 01 ( )       − + = − += − − +=−= Rc Rc T Rc TR T Rc RR TTTT RF RF RFRF      22 :' 01 12 λ λ R f c R f c R c R f T f RF fc RF c R RF RF     22 1 1 1 ' 1 ' / 1 −=      −≈             + − == = << λ R fDoppler 2 −= Two Way Doppler Frequency Shift ( )0≠R Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR Systems
  • 19. 19 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO The received signal is: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )tnoise c RR tRRtftE tnoisettttfttEtE fc dddr +            + −++−= +−+−−= = 21 21 0 000 / 00 2 2cos 2cos 00 ϕ λ π πα ϕπα λ If we consider only (c = speed of light) then the frequency of the electromagnetic wave that reaches the receiver is given by: c td Rd <<                     + −≈       +             +−=             + −+      + −= c td Rd td Rd f c td Rd td Rd ud d ff c RR t c RR tf td d f 21 0 21 0~ 00 2121 0 1 2 1 2 2 1  ϕ π ϕπ π λ       + −= td Rd td Rd fd 21 is the doppler frequency shift at the receiver Christian Johann Doppler first observed the effect in acoustics.
  • 20. 20 2-Way Doppler Shift Versus Velocity and Radio FrequencySOLO Table of Content λλ logloglog −=⇒−= td Rd f td Rd f dd
  • 21. 21 SOLO • Transmitter always on • Range information can be obtained by modulating EM wave [e.g., frequency modulation (FM), phase modulation (PM)] • Simple radars used for speed timing, semi-active missile illuminators, altimeters, proximity fuzes. • Continuous Wave Radar (CW Radar) Table of Content
  • 22. 22 SOLO • Continuous Wave Radar (CW Radar) The basic CW Radar will transmit an unmodulated (fixed carrier frequency) signal. ( ) [ ]00cos ϕω += tAts The received signal (in steady – state) will be. ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕωωα +−+= dDr ttAts α – attenuation factor ωD – two way Doppler shift c RfR ff fc DDD  0 / 22 &2 0 −=−== =λ λ πω The Received Power is related to the Transmitted Power by (Radar Equation): 4 1 ~ RP P tr rcv One solution is to have separate antennas for transmitting and receiving. For R = 103 m this ratio is 10-12 or 120 db. This means that we must have a good isolation between continuously transmitting energy and receiving energy. Basic CW Radar
  • 23. 23 SOLO • Continuous Wave Radar (CW Radar) The received signal (in steady – state) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]002cos ϕπα +−⋅+= dDr ttffAts We can see that the sign of the Doppler is ambiguous (we get the same result for positive and negative ωD). To solve the problem of doppler sign ambiguity we can split the Local Oscillator into two channels and phase shifting the Signal in one by 90◦ (quadrature - Q) with respect to other channel (in-phase – I). Both channels are downconverted to baseband. If we look at those channels as the real and imaginary parts of a complex signal, we get: has the Fourier Transform: ( ){ } ( ) ( )[ ]DDv ts ωωδωωδπ ++−=F After being heterodyned to baseband (video band), the signal becomes (after ignoring amplitude factors and fixed-phase terms): ( ) [ ]tts Dv ωcos= ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] tj DDv D etjtts ω ωω 2 1 sincos 2 1 =+= ( ){ } ( )Dv ts ωωδ π −= 2 F Table of Content
  • 24. 24 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) The transmitted signal is: ( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕθω ++= ttAts The frequency of this signal is: ( ) ( )      += t dt d tf θω π 0 2 1 For FMCW the θ (t) has a linear slope as seen in the figures bellow Table of Content
  • 25. 25 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) The received signal is: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕθωωα +−+−+= ddDr ttttAts α – attenuation factor ( ) ( )    −++= dDr tt dt d fftf θ π2 1 0 ωD – two way Doppler shift λ πω R ff DDD 2 &2 −== td – two way time delay c R td 2 = The frequency of received signal is: λ – mean value of wavelength Linear Sawtooth Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
  • 26. 26 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) To extract the information we must subtract the received signal frequency from the transmitted signal frequency. This is done by mixing (multiplying) those signals and use a Lower Side-Band Filter to retain the difference of frequencies ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Ddrb ftt dt d t dt d tftftf −    −−    =−= θ π θ π 2 1 2 1 The frequency of mixed signal is: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕθωωα +−+−+= ddDr ttttAts ( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕθω ++= ttAts ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]ddD ddDdr ttttttA ttttttAts −++−+++ −−+−−= θθωωωα θθωωα 00 2 0 2 cos 2 1 cos 2 1 Lower Side-Band Filter Lower SB Filter Linear Sawtooth Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
  • 27. 27 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) The returned signal has a frequency change due to: • two way time delay c R td 2 = • two way doppler addition λ R fD 2 −= From Figure above, the beat frequencies fb (difference between transmitted to received frequencies) for a Linear Sawtooth Frequency Modulation are: D m Dd m b fR Tc f ft T f f − ∆ =− ∆ = + 4 2/ D m Dd m b fR Tc f ft T f f − ∆ −=− ∆ −= − 4 2/ ( ) 28 −+ − ∆ = bbm ff f Tc R ( ) 2 −+ + −= bb D ff f We have 2 equations with 2 unknowns R and fD with the solution: Linear Sawtooth Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
  • 28. 28 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) The Received Power is related to the Transmitted Power by (Radar Equation): For R = 103 m this ratio is 10-12 or 120 db. This means that we must have a good isolation between continuously transmitting energy and receiving energy. 4 1 ~ RP P tr rcv One solution is to have separate antennas for transmitting and receiving. Linear Sawtooth Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
  • 29. 29 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Linear Sawtooth Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave Performing Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) we obtain fb + and fb. ( ) 28 −+ − ∆ = bbm ff f Tc R ( ) 2 −+ + −= bb D ff f From the Doppler Window we get fb + and fb - , from which:
  • 30. 30 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) The received signal is: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕθωωα +−+−+= ddDr ttttAts α – attenuation factor ( ) ( )    −++= dDr tt dt d fftf θ π2 1 0 ωD – two way Doppler shift λ πω R ff DDD 2 &2 −== td – two way time delay c R td 2 = The frequency of received signal is: λ – mean value of wavelength Linear Triangular Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
  • 31. 31 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) To extract the information we must subtract the received signal frequency from the transmitted signal frequency. This is done by mixing (multiplying) those signals and use a Lower Side-Band Filter to retain the difference of frequencies ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Ddrb ftt dt d t dt d tftftf −    −−    =−= θ π θ π 2 1 2 1 The frequency of mixed signal is: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕθωωα +−+−+= ddDr ttttAts ( ) ( )[ ]00cos ϕθω ++= ttAts ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]ddD ddDdr ttttttA ttttttAts −++−+++ −−+−−= θθωωωα θθωωα 00 2 0 2 cos 2 1 cos 2 1 Lower Side-Band Filter Lower SB Filter Linear Triangular Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
  • 32. 32 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) The returned signal has a frequency change due to: • two way time delay c R td 2 = • two way doppler addition λ R fD 2 −= From Figure above, the beat frequencies fb (difference between transmitted to received frequencies) for a Linear Triangular Frequency Modulation are: D m Dd m b fR Tc f ft T f f − ∆ =− ∆ = + 8 4/ positive slope D m Dd m b fR Tc f ft T f f − ∆ −=− ∆ −= − 8 4/ negative slope ( ) 28 −+ − ∆ = bbm ff f Tc R ( ) 2 −+ + −= bb D ff f We have 2 equations with 2 unknowns R and fD with the solution: Linear Triangular Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
  • 33. 33 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) The Range Unambiguity is given by the FMCW time period Tm: Range Resolution is a function of FMCW bandwidth and the linearity of FM: msunambiguou T c R 2 = To preserve this Range Resolution the non-linearity must be: For Linear Triangular FMCW the bandwidth is: fB ∆= 2 For a perfect Linear Triangular modulation the Range Resolution is given by: f c B c R ∆ == 2δ mm m sunambiguou TfTBT c B c R R tynonlineari ∆ ===<< 2 11 2 2δ Linear Triangular Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
  • 34. 34 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) The Received Power is related to the Transmitted Power by (Radar Equation): For R = 103 m this ratio is 10-12 or 120 db. This means that we must have a good isolation between continuously transmitting energy and receiving energy. 4 1 ~ RP P tr rcv But solutions with a common antenna for transmitting and receiving, and with a good isolation between them, do exist. One solution is to have separate antennas for transmitting and receiving.
  • 35. 35 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) One Target Detected Performing FFT for the positive slope we obtain fb + . Performing FFT for the negative slope we obtain fb - . ( ) 28 −+ − ∆ = bbm ff f Tc R ( ) 2 −+ + −= bb D ff f Two Targets Detected Performing FFT for each of the positive and negative slopes we obtain two Beats in each Doppler window and we cannot say what is the pair in the other window. A solution to solve this is to add an unmodulated segment (see next slide)
  • 36. 36 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Two Targets Detected Performing FFT for each of the positive, negative and zero slopes we obtain two Beats in each Doppler window. To solve two targets we can use the Segmented Linear Frequency Modulation. In the zero slope Doppler window, we obtain the Doppler frequency of the two targets fD1 and fD2. Since , it is easy to find the pair from Positive and Negative Slope Windows that fulfill this condition, and then to compute the respective ranges using: ( ) 2 −+ + −= bb D ff f ( ) 28 −+ − ∆ = bbm ff f Tc R This is a solution for more than two targets. One other solution that can solve also range and doppler ambiguities is to use many modulation slopes (Δ f and Tm). Table of Content
  • 37. 37 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Sinusoidal Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave One of the practical frequency modulations is the Sinusoidal Frequency Modulation. Assume that the transmitted signal is: ( ) ( )      ∆ += tf f f tfAts m m ππ 2sin2sin 0 The spectrum of this signal is: ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( )[ ]{ } ( )[ ] ( )[ ]{ } ( )[ ] ( )[ ]{ } + −++      ∆ + −++      ∆ + −++      ∆ +       ∆ = tfftff f f JA tfftff f f JA tfftff f f JA tf f f JAts mm m mm m mm m m 32sin32sin 22sin22sin 2sin2sin 2sin 003 002 001 00 ππ ππ ππ π where Jn (u) is the Bessel Function of the first kind, n order and argument u. Bessel Functions of the first kind
  • 38. 38 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Sinusoidal Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave One of the practical frequency modulations is the Sinusoidal Frequency Modulation. Assume that the transmitted signal is: ( ) ( )      ∆ += tf f f tfAts m m ππ 2sin2sin 0 The transmitted and received signal are heterodyned in a mixer to give the difference frequency The received signal is: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]       − ∆ +−⋅+= dm m dD ttf f f ttffAtr ππα 2sin2sin 0 Lower Side-Band Filter ( )ts ( )tr ( )[ ] ( )[ ] ( )       ∆ −− ∆ +−+ tf f f ttf f f ttftfA m m dm m dDd πππα 2sin2sin2cos 0 2 ( )[ ] ( )                   − ∆ −−+= 2 2cossin 2 2cos 0 2 d mdm m dDd t tftf f f ttftfA πππα
  • 39. 39 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Sinusoidal Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave Since td << Tm=1/fm we have ( ) ( )[ ] ( )                   − ∆ −−+= 2 2cossin 2 2cos 0 2 d mdm m dDd t tftf f f ttftfAtm πππα Lower Side-Band Filter ( )ts ( )tr ( )tm ( ) ( )[ ]                   −∆−−+≈ 2 2cos22cos 0 2 d mddDd t tftfttftfAtm πππα The frequency is obtained by differentiating the argument of this equation with respect to time ( )[ ] ( )             −∆+=                   −∆−−+= 2 2sin2 2 2cos22 2 1 0 d mmdD d mddDdb t tfftff t tftfttftf td d f ππ πππ π ( ) m m dm m f d mdmD f tf d mmdD m f b m b t tftfffdt t tfftff f dtf f f 2 1 0 2 1 0 12 1 0 2 2cos2 2 2sin2 2 1 1 2 1 1                   −∆−≈                   −∆+== ∫∫ << πππ π The average of the beat frequency over one-half a modulating cycle is:
  • 40. 40 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Sinusoidal Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave Lower Side-Band Filter ( )ts ( )tr ( )tm R c ff ftffff m DdmD tf b dm ∆ +=∆+≈= << + 8 4 1π The average of the beat frequency over one-half a modulating cycle is: ( ) ( )      ∆ += tf f f tfAts m m ππ 2sin2sin 0 By changing the phase of the sinusoidal modulation by 180 degree each modulation cycle, we will get: ( ) ( )      ∆ −=− tf f f tfAts m m ππ 2sin2sin 0 R c ff ftffff m DdmD tf b dm ∆ −=∆−≈= << − 8 4 1π The average of the beat frequency over one-half a modulating cycle is:
  • 41. 41 SOLO • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) Sinusoidal Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave Lower Side-Band Filter ( )ts ( )tr ( )tm R c ff ftffff m DdmD tf b dm ∆ +=∆+≈= << + 8 4 1π A possible modulating is describe bellow, in which we introduce a unmodulated segment to measure the doppler and two sinusoidal modulation segments in anti-phase. From which we obtain: R c ff ftffff m DdmD tf b dm ∆ −=∆−≈= << − 8 4 1π The averages of the beat frequency over one-half a modulating cycle are: 28 −+ − ∆ = bbm ff f Tc R 2 −+ + = bb D ff f (must be the same as in unmodulated segment) Note: We obtaind the same form as for Triangular Frequency Modulated CW Table of Content
  • 42. 42 SOLO • Multiple Frequency CW Radar (MFCW) Assume that the transmitted signal is: ( ) [ ]tfAts 02sin π= The received signal is: ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]dD ttffAtr −⋅+= 02sin πα c R t c R ff dD 2 , 2 10 ≈−≈  ( ) ( )     ⋅−⋅−⋅+= c R f c R ftffAtr DD 2 2 2 22sin 00 πππα where: Therefore: We can see that the change in received phase Δφ is related to range R by: 2/ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 / 00 00 λ ππππϕ λ R c R f c R f c R f cfff D D =>> =⋅≈⋅+⋅=∆ The maximum unambiguous range is given when Δφ=2π : 2/λ=sunambiguouR ( ) ( )GHzfmmBandLGHzfcm 956.1115 00 =÷→==λ We can see that the maximum unambiguous range is too small, when we use a single transmitted frequency, for any practical applications.
  • 43. 43 SOLO • Multiple Frequency CW Radar (MFCW) Assume that the transmitted signal is: ( ) [ ]tfAts 02sin π= The received signal is: ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]dD ttffAtr −⋅+= 02sin πα c R t c R ff dD 2 , 2 10 ≈−≈  ( ) ( )     ⋅−⋅−⋅+= c R f c R ftffAtr DD 2 2 2 22sin 00 πππα where: Therefore: We can see that the change in received phase Δφ is related to range R by: 2/ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 / 00 00 λ ππππϕ λ R c R f c R f c R f cfff D D =>> =⋅≈⋅+⋅=∆ The maximum unambiguous range is given when Δφ=2π : 2/λ=sunambiguouR ( ) ( )GHzfmmBandLGHzfcm 956.1115 00 =÷→==λ We can see that the maximum unambiguous range is too small, when we use a single transmitted frequency, for any practical applications. The maximum unambiguous range can be increased by using multiple transmitted frequencies.
  • 44. 44 SOLO Assume that the transmitter transmits n CW frequencies fi (i=0,1,…,n-1) Transmitted signals are: ( ) [ ] 1,,1,02sin −== nitfAts iii π The received signals are: ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]dDiiiii ttffAtr −⋅+= πα 2sin c R t c R f c R fff d i j jDi 2 , 22 10 1 0 ≈−≈        ∆+−≈ ∑= where: 1,,2,11 −=∆+= − nifff iii  Since we want to use no more than one antenna for transmitted signals and one antenna for received signals we must have 1,,2,10 1 −=<<∆∑= niff i j j  We can see that the change in received phase Δφi , of two adjacent signals, is related to range R by: ( ) c R f c R c R f c R f c R ff c R f i cR iiDDii ii 2 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 ⋅∆≈⋅⋅∆+⋅∆=⋅−+⋅∆=∆ << − πππππϕ  The maximum unambiguous range is given when Δφi=2π : i sunambiguou f c R ∆ = 2 • Multiple Frequency CW Radar (MFCW)
  • 45. 45 SOLO • Multiple Frequency CW Radar (MFCW) Table of Content
  • 46. 46 SOLO • Phase Modulated Continuous Wave (PMCW) Another way to obtain a time mark in a CW signal is by using Phase Modulation (PM). PMCW radar measures target range by applying a discrete phase shift every T seconds to the transmitted CW signal, producing a phase-code waveform. The returning waveform is correlated with a stored version of the transmitted waveform. The correlation process gives a maximum when we have a match. The time to achieve this match is the time-delay between transmitted and receiving signals and provides the required target range. There are two types of phase coding techniques: binary phase codes and polyphase codes. In the figure bellow we can see a 7-length Barker binary phase code of the transmitted signal
  • 47. 47 SOLO • Phase Modulated Continuous Wave (PMCW) In the figure bellow we can see a 7-length Barker binary phase code of the received signal that, at the receiver, passes a 7-cell delay line, and is correlated to a sample of the 7-length Barker binary signal sample. Digital Correlation At the Receiver the coded pulse enters a 7 cells delay lane (from left to right), a bin at each clock. The signals in the cells are summed -1 = -1 +1 -1 = 0 -1 +1 -1 = -1 -1 -1 +1-( -1) = 0 +1 -1 -1 –(+1)-( -1) = -1 +1 +1 -1-(-1) –(+1)-1= 0 +1+1 +1-( -1)-(-1) +1-(-1)= 8 +1+1 –(+1)-( -1) -1-( +1)= 0 +1-(+1) –(+1) -1-( -1)= -1 -(+1)-(+1) +1 -( -1)= 0 -(+1)+1-(+1) = -1 +1-(+1) = 0 -(+1) = -1 0 = 0 -1-1 -1 clock 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 +1+1+1+1 Table of Content
  • 48. 48 SOLO Waveform Hierarchy • Pulse Waves • Range Resolution is determined by the system bandwidth B cc R B Filter Matched 22 /1 ττ = ==∆ 200 MHz  1 meter 325 MHz  2 feet 650 MHz  1 foot 1300 MHz  6 inch • Use short pulse (τ) for high resolution, or, bandwidth can be achieved by: • Pulse Compression – intra-pulse coding • Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) • Stretch Processing • Stepped Frequency Waveform (SFWF) – pulse-to-pulse coding Table of Content
  • 49. 49 SOLO Waveform Hierarchy • Pulse Compression Techniques • Wave Coding • Frequency Modulation (FM) - Linear • Phase Modulation (PM)] - Non-linear - Pseudo-Random Noise (PRN) - Bi-phase (0º/180º) - Quad-phase (0º/90º/180º/270º) • Implementation • Hardware - Surface Acoustic Wave (SAW) expander/compressor • Digital Control - Direct Digital Synthesizer (DDS) - Software compression “filter” Table of Content
  • 50. 50 SOLO Waveform Hierarchy • Stepped Frequency Waveform (SFWF) The Stepped Frequency Waveform is a Pulse Radar System technique for obtaining high resolution range profiles with relative narrow bandwidth pulses. • SFWF is an ensemble of narrow band (monochromatic) pulses, each of which is stepped in frequency relative to the preceding pulse, until the required bandwidth is covered. • We process the ensemble of received signals using FFT processing. • The resulting FFT output represents a high resolution range profile of the Radar illuminated area. • Sometimes SFWF is used in conjunction with pulse compression.
  • 51. 51 SOLO Waveform Hierarchy • Stepped Frequency Waveform (SFWF)
  • 52. 52 SOLO Waveform Hierarchy • Pulse Compression Techniques
  • 53. 53 SOLO Waveform Hierarchy • Steped Frequency Waveform (SFWF) Table of Content
  • 54. 54 SOLO Waveform Hierarchy • Pulse Compression Techniques
  • 55. 55
  • 56. 56
  • 57. 57 SOLO Waveform Hierarchy • Pulse Compression Techniques
  • 58. 58 SOLO Waveform Hierarchy • Pulse Compression Techniques Phase Coding A transmitted radar pulse of duration T is divided in N sub-pulses of equal duration τ = T/N, and each sub-pulse is phase coded in terms of the phase of the carrier. The complex envelope of the phase coded signal is given by: ( ) ( ) ( )∑ − = −= 1 0 2/1 1 N n n ntu N tg τ τ where: ( ) ( )    ≤≤ = elsewhere tj tu n n 0 0exp τϕ
  • 59. 59 -1 Pulse bi-phase Barker coded of length 3 Digital Correlation At the Receiver the coded pulse enters a 3 cells delay lane (from left to right), a bin at each clock. The signals in the cells are multiplied according to ck* sign and summed. clock -1 = -11 +1 -1 = 02 -( +1) = -15 0 = 06 +1 +1-( -1) = 33 +1-( +1) = 04 SOLO Pulse Compression Techniques 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 +1+1 0 = 00
  • 60. 60 -1 = -1 +1 -1 = 0 -1 +1 -1 = -1 -1 -1 +1-( -1) = 0 +1 -1 -1 –(+1)-( -1) = -1 +1 +1 -1-(-1) –(+1)-1= 0 +1+1 +1-( -1)-(-1) +1-(-1)= 8 +1+1 –(+1)-( -1) -1-( +1)= 0 +1-(+1) –(+1) -1-( -1)= -1 -(+1)-(+1) +1 -( -1)= 0 -(+1)+1-(+1) = -1 +1-(+1) = 0 -(+1) = -1 0 = 0 -1-1 -1 Pulse bi-phase Barker coded of length 7 Digital Correlation At the Receiver the coded pulse enters a 7 cells delay lane (from left to right), a bin at each clock. The signals in the cells are summed clock 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 SOLO Pulse Compression Techniques +1+1+1+1
  • 61. 61 -1 = -1 -j +j = 0 +j -1-j = -1 +1 +1+1+1 = 4 -j-1+j = -1 +j - j = 0 Pulse poly-phase coded of length 4 At the Receiver the coded pulse enters a 3 cells delay lane (from left to right), a bin at each clock. The signals in the cells are multiplied by -1,+j,-j or +1 and summed. clock SOLO Poly-Phase Modulation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1+ 1+j+ 1+j+j− 1+j+j−1− j+j−1− j−1− 1− 1− 1+j+ j− -1 = -1 0 Σ
  • 62. 62 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Resolution Resolution is the spacing (in range, Doppler, angle, etc.) we must have in order to distinguish between two different targets. first target response second target response composite target response greather then 3 db Distinguishable Targets first target response second target response composite target response Undistinguishable Targets less then 3 db The two targets are distinguishable if the composite (sum) of the received signal has a deep (between the two picks) of at least 3 db.
  • 63. 63 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Pulse Range Resolution Resolution is the spacing (in range, Doppler, angle, etc.) we must have in order to distinguish between two different targets. Range Resolution RADAR τ c R RR ∆+ Target # 1 Target # 2 Assume two targets spaced by a range Δ R and a radar pulse of τ seconds. The echoes start to be received at the radar antenna at times: 2 R/c – first target 2 (R+Δ R)/c – second target The echo of the first target ends at 2 R/c + τ τ τ time from pulse transmission c R2 ( ) c RR ∆+2 τ+ c R2 Received Signals Target # 1 Target # 2 The two targets echoes can be resolved if: c RR c R ∆+ =+ 22 τ 2 τc R =∆ Pulse Range Resolution
  • 64. 64 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Pulse Range Resolution (continue) time from pulse transmission c R2 ( ) c RR ∆+2 τ+ c R2 Received Signals Target #1 Target #2 Rcvτ Rcvτ 2 τc R =∆Pulse Range Resolution To improve the Pulse Range Resolution we must decrease the Received pulse duration τRcv. This is done by Pulse Compression technique: • Linear or Nonlinear Frequency Modulation • Phase Modulation (bi-phase, poly-phase) The Pulse Range Resolution therefore is given by 1/ 2 2 Rcv RcvBW Rcv Rcv c c R BW τ τ ≈ ∆ = =
  • 65. 65 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Angle Resolution Resolution is the spacing (in range, Doppler, angle, etc.) we must have in order to distinguish between two different targets. Angle Resolution RADAR Target # 1 Target # 2 R R 3 θ       2 cos 3θ R 3 3 2 sin2 θ θ RR ≈      Angle Resolution is Determined by Antenna Beamwidth. 3 3 2 sin2 θ θ RRRC ≈      =∆ Angle Resolution is considered equivalent to the 3 db Antenna Beamwidth θ3. The Cross Range Resolution is given by:
  • 66. 66 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Doppler Resolution The Doppler resolution is defined by the Bandwidth of the Doppler Filters BWDoppler. Doppler Dopplerf BW∆ =
  • 67. 67 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Resolution Cell Resolution is the spacing (in range, Doppler, angle, etc.) we must have in order to distinguish between two different targets. Resolution Cell RADAR R∆ 3 θR 3 φR The Volume Resolution Cell is the volume defined by the subtended solid angle and range resolution.  RRRRR RR V rrectangulaofarea ellipseofarea ∆≈∆=∆            =∆     33 2 33 2 785.0 33 422 φθφθ πφθ π Volume Resolution Cell increases with R2 .
  • 68. 68 Range Measurement Unambiguity ( )tf1 t 2 τ 2 2 τ −T T A T T T 2 τ − 2 2 τ +T 2 τ −T 2 τ +T 1 2 3c R t 2 = ( )tf1 t 2 τ 2 2 τ −T RA T T T 2 τ − 2 2 τ +T 2 τ −T 2 τ +T 1 2 3 TransmittedPulses ReceivedPulses SOLO The returned signal from the target located at a range R from the transmitter reaches the receiver (collocated with the transmitter) after c R t 2 = To detect the target, a train of pulses must be transmitted. PRT – Pulse Repetition Time PRF – Pulse Repetition Frequency = 1/PRT To have an unanbigous target range the received pulse must arrive before the transmission of the next pulse, therefore: PRF PRT c Runabigous 1 2 =< PRF c Runabigous 2 < Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR Systems
  • 72. 72 Resolving Range Measurement Ambiguity SOLO To solve the ambiguity of targets return we must use multiple batches, each with different PRIs (Pulse Repetition Interval). Example: one target, use two batches First batch: PRI 1 = T1 Target Return = t1-amb R1_amb=2 c t1_amb Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR Systems Second batch: PRI 2 = T2 Target Return = t2-amb R2_amb=2 c t2_amb To find the range, R, we must solve for the integers k1 and k2 in the equation: ( ) ( )ambamb tTkctTkcR _222_111 22 +=+= We have 2 equations with 3 unknowns: R, k1 and k2, that can be solved because k1 and k2 are integers. One method is to use the Chinese Remainder Theorem . For more targets, more batches must be used to solve the Range ambiguity. See Tildocs # 763333 v1
  • 76. 76 Doppler Frequency Shifts (Hz) for Various Radar Frequency Bands and Target Speeds Band 1 m/s 1 knot 1 mph L (1 GHz) S (3 GHz) C (5 GHz) X (10 GHz) Ku (16 GHz) Ka (35 GHz) mm (96 GHz) 6.67 20.0 33.3 66.7 107 233 633 3.43 10.3 17.1 34.3 54.9 120 320 2.98 8.94 14.9 29.8 47.7 104 283 Radar Frequency Radial Target Speed SOLO
  • 77. 77 Coherent Pulse Doppler RadarSOLO • STALO provides a continuous frequency fLO • COHO provides the coherent Intermediate Frequency fIF • Pulse Modulator defines the pulse width the Pulses Rate Frequency (PRF) number of pulses in a batch • Transmitter/Receiver (T/R) (Circulator) - in the Transmission Phase directs the Transmitted Energy to the Antenna and isolates the Receiving Channel • IF Amplifier is a Band Pass Filter in the Receiving Channel centered around IF frequency fIF. • Mixer multiplies two sinusoidal signals providing signals with sum or differences of the input frequencies - in the Receiving Phase directs the Received Energy to the Receiving Channel 21 ff >> 2f 1f 21 ff + 21 ff −
  • 78. 78 SOLO Coherent Pulse Doppler Radar An idealized target doppler response will provide at IF Amplifier output the signal: ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( ) [ ]tjtj dIFIF dIFdIF ee A tAts ωωωω ωω +−+ +=+= 2 cos that has the spectrum: f fIF+fd -fIF-fd -fIF fIF A2 /4A2 /4 |s|2 0 Because we used N coherent pulses of width τ and with Pulse Repetition Time T the spectrum at the IF Amplifier output f -fd fd A2 /4A2 /4 |s|2 0 After the mixer and base-band filter: ( ) ( ) [ ]tjtj dd dd ee A tAts ωω ω − +== 2 cos We can not distinguish between positive to negative doppler!!! and after the mixer :
  • 79. 79 SOLO Coherent Pulse Doppler Radar We can not distinguish between positive to negative doppler!!! Split IF Signal: ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( ) [ ]tjtj dIFIF dIFdIF ee A tAts ωωωω ωω +−+ +=+= 2 cos ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( )[ ]t A ts t A ts dIFQ dIFI ωω ωω += += sin 2 cos 2 Define a New Complex Signal: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tj QI dIF e A tsjtstg ωω + =+= 2 f fIF+fd fIF A2 /2|g|2 0 f fd A2 /2 |s|2 0 Combining the signals after the mixers ( ) tj d d e A tg ω 2 = We now can distinguish between positive to negative doppler!!!
  • 80. 80 SOLO Coherent Pulse Doppler Radar Split IF Signal: ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( )[ ]t A ts t A ts dIFQ dIFI ωω ωω += += sin 2 cos 2 Define a New Complex Signal: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ]tj QI dIF e A tsjtstg ωω + =+= 2 f fd A2 /2 |s|2 0 Combining the signals after the mixers ( ) tj d d e A tg ω 2 = We now can distinguish between positive to negative doppler!!! From the Figure we can see that in this case the doppler is unambiguous only if: T ff PRd 1 =< Because we used N coherent pulses of width τ and with Pulse Repetition Time T the spectrum after the mixer output is
  • 81. 81 Resolving Doppler Measurement Ambiguity       +=      += ambDambD f T kf T kV _2 2 2_1 1 1 1 2 1 2 λλ SOLO To solve the Doppler ambiguity of targets return we must use multiple batches, each with different PRIs (Pulse Repetition Interval). Example: one target, use two batches First batch: PRI 1 = T1 Target Doppler Return in Range Gate i = fD1-amb V1_amb=(λ/2) fD1_amb Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR Systems To find the range-rate, V, we must solve for the integers k1 and k2 in the equation: We have 2 equations with 3 unknowns: V, k1 and k2, that can be solved because k1 and k2 are integers. One method is to use the Chinese Remainder Theorem . Second batch: PRI 2 = T2 Target Doppler Return in Range Gate i = fD2-amb V2_amb=(λ/2) fD2_amb For more targets, more batches must be used to solve the Doppler ambiguity. See Tildocs # 763333 v1 Return to Table of Content
  • 82. 82 SOLO Coherent Pulse Doppler Radar
  • 83. 83 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Phase Comparison Monopulse dα Port A Port B S D α cos d Antenna Boresight α λ π ψ cos 2 d= wavefront for a point source at infinity To illustrate the Monopulse Antenna assume thsat the RF is received through only two ports A and B. When the rays are received from a direction ά relative to the Antenna boresight, we obtain a phase difference of between port A and port B: α λ π ψ cos 2 d= AeB jψ = Let compute ( ) 2 cos 2 sin 2 cos2)sincos1(1: ψψψ ψψψ AjAjAeBAS j       +=++=+=+= ( ) ( ) 2 sin 2 sin 2 cos2)sincos1(1: ψψψ ψψψ AjAjjAejBAjDj j       +=−−=−=−=       = 2 tan ψ SDj
  • 84. 84 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Transmitted RF signal (in phasor form) is ( ) ( )tpetS tj Tr RFω = p (t) - the pulse train function At the front-end of the Antenna we receive a shifted and attenuated version of the transmitted pulse: ( ) ( ) ( )cRtpeVtS tj cv TRF /2Re −= −ωω ωRF - the RF angular velocity ωT - the target’s Doppler shift 2 R/c time delay between transmission and reception V – random complex voltage strength c – velocity of light We assume that from the Antenna emerge radar signal of the Sum S and Difference D ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )cRtpFeVD cRtpeVS tj tj TRF TRF /2 /2 −∆= −= − − ψωω ωω
  • 85. 85 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Receiver The Superheterodyne Receiver translates the high RF frequency ωRF to a lower frequency for a better processing. This is done my mixing (nonlinear multiplication) the input frequency ωRF- ωT with ωRF± ωIF to obtain ωIF - ωT IF Amp IF Amp Band Pass at IF Band Pass at IF S D 'D 'S ( ) tjst IFRF eLO ωω ± 1 Mixer Mixer First Intemediate Frequaency (1st IF) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )cRtpFeVD cRtpeVS tj tj TRF TRF /2 /2 −∆= −= − − ψωω ωω The Receiver translates the high RF frequency ωRF to a lower frequency to a better processing. This is done my mixing (nonlinear multiplication) the input frequency ωRF- ωT with ωRF± ωIF to obtain ωIF - ωT . The IF signal is amplified and bandpass filtered to produce an output at IF frequency ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )cRtpFeVD cRtpeVS tj tj TIF TIF /2'' /2'' −∆= −= − − ψωω ωω If the mixing frequency is centered at ωRF± ωIF than the output is centered at ωIF and at the image 2 ωRF± ωIF .
  • 86. 86 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Receiver (continue – 1) A second mixing frequency is sometimes added to avoid potential problems with image frequency. IF Amp 'S ''S ( ) tjnd IFIF eLO ωω 2 2 ± Mixer Second Intemediate Frequaency (2nd IF) IF Amp 'D ''D Mixer Phase Shifter AGC AGC Band Pass at 2nd IF Band Pass at 2nd IF ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )cRtpFeVD cRtpeVS tj tj TIF TIF /2" /2" 2 2 −∆= −= − − ψ ωω ωω The output of the Second Intermediate Frequency (2nd IF) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )cRtpFeVD cRtpeVS tj tj TIF TIF /2'' /2'' −∆= −= − − ψωω ωω
  • 87. 87 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Receiver (continue – 2) A second mixing frequency stage the signal consists of sinusoidals that possesses an arbitrary phase relationship with respect to the radar’s phase reference. "'IS I/Q Detection Video Amplifier A/D Mixer Video Amplifier A/D Mixer Video Amplifier A/D Mixer Video Amplifier A/D Mixer 2/π 2/π ''S ''D "'QS "'Q D "'I D "'ijI D "'ijQ D "'ijQS "'ijI S tj IF e 2ω− [ ] ( ) [ ] ( )cRtpeVS cRtpeVS tj Q tj I T T /2"Im'" /2"Re'" −= −= ω ω For a coherent Doppler and monopulse processing is necessary to digitize the signal. I/Q Detection To find the phase and reduce the signal frequency to Video with two 2nd IF signals at 90◦ (cos => I = in phase, sin => Q = quadrature). [ ] ( ) ( ) [ ] ( ) ( )cRtpFeVD cRtpFeVD tj Q tj I T T /2"Im'" /2"Re'" −∆= −∆= ψ ψ ω ω '"'"'" QI SjSS += '"'"'" QI DjDD +=
  • 88. 88 SOLO Coherent Pulse Doppler Conceptual Operation
  • 89. 89 SOLO Signal Processing Range – Doppler Cells in Σ and ΔAz, ΔEl After Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of the signals of the Batch in each Range Gate we obtain Σ, ΔAz, ΔEl Rang-Doppler Maps.
  • 90. 90 SOLO Signal Processing Parameters of Σ , ΔAz, ΔEl Range – Doppler Maps f f M R R N sunambiguousunambiguou ∆ = ∆ = & The Parameters defining the Range – Doppler Maps are: Δ R – Map Range Resolution Δ f – Map Doppler Resolution RUnambiguous – Unambiguous Range fUnambiguous – Unambiguous Doppler Range – Doppler Cell Range – Doppler Map Range Gates are therefore i = 1, 2, …, N Number of Range-Doppler Cells = N x M Doppler Gates are therefore j = 1, 2, …, M Note: The Map Range & Doppler resolution (Δ R, Δ f) may change as function of Seeker task (Search, Detection, Acquisition, Track). This is done by choosing the Pulse Repetition Interval (PRI) and the number of pulses in a batch. resolutionresolution ffRR ≥∆≥∆ &
  • 91. 91 SOLO Signal Processing Generation of Σ , ΔAz, ΔEl Range – Doppler Maps (continue – 1) ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( )ttTktttTkttfCts ddkdk r k r k ++≤≤++−= τθπ2cos The received signal from the scatter k is: Ck r – amplitude of received signal td (t) – round trip delay time given by ( ) 2/c tRR tt kk d + = θk – relative phase The received signal is down-converted to base-band in order to extract the quadrature components. More precisely sk r (t) is mixed with: ( ) [ ] τθπ +≤≤+= TktTktfCty kkk 2cos After Low-Pass filtering the quadrature components of Σk, ΔAz k or ΔEl k signals are: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )      = = tAtx tAtx kkQk kkIk ψ ψ sin cos ( ) ( )       +−≅−= c tR c R fttft kk kdkk 22 22 ππψ The quadrature samples are given by: ( ) ( )             +−≅= c tR c R fjAjAtX kk kkkkk 22 2expexp πψ Ak - amplitude of Σk, ΔAz k or ΔEl k signals ψk - phase of Σk, ΔAz k or ΔEl k signals ( )             +−            +≅+= c tR c R fAj c tR c R fAxjxtX kk kk kk kkQkIkk  22 2sin 22 2cos ππ
  • 92. 92 SOLO Signal Processing Generation of Σ , ΔAz, ΔEl Range – Doppler Maps (continue – 2) The received signal from the scatter k is: The energy of the received signal is given by: ( ) ( ) 2 kkkk AtXtXP == ∗ ( )             +−            +≅+= c tR c R fAj c tR c R fAxjxtX kk kk kk kkQkIkk  22 2sin 22 2cos ππ where * is the complex conjugate. Therefore: kk PA =
  • 93. 93
  • 94. 94 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO References on RADAR Skolnik, M.I., “Introduction to Radar Systems”, McGraw Hill, 1962 Scheer, J.A., Kurtz, J.L., Ed., “Coherent Radar Performance Estimation”, Artech House, 1993 Schleher, D.C., “MTI and Pulsed Doppler Radar”, Artech House, 1991 Barton, D.K., Ward, H.R., “Handbook of Radar Measurements”, Artech House, 19 Morris, G.V., “Airborne Pulse Radar”, Artech House, 2nd Ed., 19 Maksimov, M.V., Gorgonov, G.I., “Electronic Homing Systems”, Artech House, 19 Wehner, D.R., “High Resolution Radar”, Artech House, 19 Hovanessian, S.A., “Introduction to Sensor Systems”, Artech House, 19 Barton, D.K., “Modern Radar System Analysis”, Artech House, 19 Berkowitz, R.S., “Modern Radar Analysis, Evaluation and System Design”, John Wiley & Sons, 1965
  • 95. 95 SOLO Technion Israeli Institute of Technology 1964 – 1968 BSc EE 1968 – 1971 MSc EE Israeli Air Force 1970 – 1974 RAFAEL Israeli Armament Development Authority 1974 – 2013 Stanford University 1983 – 1986 PhD AA
  • 96. 96 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Chinese Remainder Theorem The original form of the theorem, contained in a third-century AD book by Chinese mathematician Sun Tzu and later republished in a 1247 book by Qin Jiushao. Suppose n1, n2, …, nk are integers which are pairwise coprime. Then, for any given integers a1,a2, …, ak, there exists an integer x solving the system 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 , , , integers k k k k k k x n t a n a x n t a n a x n t a n a t t t are ≡ + > > ≡ + > > ≡ + > > L L L L L L or in modern notation ( )mod 1,2, ,i ix a n i k≡ = L ai is the reminder of x : ni x
  • 97. 97 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Chinese Remainder Theorem (continue – 1) A Constructive Solution to Find x ( )mod 1,2, ,i ix a n i k≡ = L x Define 1 2: kN n n n= L For each i, ni and N/ni are coprime. Using the extended Eulerian algorithm we can therefore find integers ri and si such that ( )/ 1i i i irn s N n+ = Define Therefore ei divided by ni has the remainder 1 and divided by nj (j≠i) has the remainder 0, because of the definition of N. ( ): / 1i i i i ie s N n rn= = − ( ) ( )1 mod 0 modi i i je n and e n i j= = ∀ ≠ Because of this the solution is of the form 1 k i i i x a e = = ∑ But also ( ) 1 mod k i i i a e x N = =∑
  • 98. 98 Range & Doppler Measurements in RADAR SystemsSOLO Chinese Remainder Theorem (continue – 2) A Constructive Solution to Find x (Example) ( )mod 1,2, ,i ix a n i k≡ = L 1 2 3: 60N n n n= × = ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 mod 3 , 3 mod 4 , 1 mod 5 . x x x ≡ ≡ ≡ 1 2 33, 4, 5n n n= = = 1 2 3/ 20, / 15, / 12N n N n N n= = = ( ){ { { { 11 1 1 / 13 3 2 20 1 sn N n r   − + = ÷   ( ){ { { { 2 2 2 2 / 11 4 3 15 1 n s N n r   − + = ÷   ( ){ { ( ){ { 33 3 3 / 5 5 2 12 1 N nn r s   + − = ÷   ( ): /i i ie s N n= ( )1 : 2 20 40e = = ( )2 : 3 15 45e = = ( )3 : 2 12 24e = − = − 1 2 32, 3, 1a a a= = = ( )1 1 2 2 3 3 2 40 3 45 1 24 191x a e a e a e= + + = × + × + × − = Check: 191 63 3 2 47 4 3 38 5 1= × + = × + = × + ( )/ 1i i i irn s N n+ =Find ri and si such that: Compute: Therefore: and ( )11 191 11 mod 60x N= ¬ = = 11 3 3 2 2 4 3 2 5 1= × + = × + = × +
  • 99. 99
  • 100. 100
  • 101. 101
  • 111. 111
  • 112. 112 SOLO Waveform Hierarchy • Steped Frequency Waveform (SFWF) 3–4GHz 6–7GHz 3GHz 4GHz 3–4GHz

Notas do Editor

  1. DiFranco, J.V., Rubin, W.I., “Radar Detection”, Artech House, 1969, Appendix A, pp. 623-625 Peeble, P.Z. Jr, “Radar Principles”, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1998, Ch. 8, Radar Resolution, pp.11-17
  2. DiFranco, J.V., Rubin, W.I., “Radar Detection”, Artech House, 1969, Appendix A, pp. 623-625 Peeble, P.Z. Jr, “Radar Principles”, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1998, Ch. 8, Radar Resolution, pp.11-17
  3. DiFranco, J.V., Rubin, W.I., “Radar Detection”, Artech House, 1969, Appendix A, pp. 623-625 Peeble, P.Z. Jr, “Radar Principles”, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1998, Ch. 1, “Elementary Concepts”, pp.11-17
  4. DiFranco, J.V., Rubin, W.I., “Radar Detection”, Artech House, 1969, Appendix A, pp. 623-625 Peeble, P.Z. Jr, “Radar Principles”, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1998, Ch. 1, “Elementary Concepts”, pp.11-17
  5. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Samuel O.Piper
  6. F.E. Nathanson, J.P. Reilly, M.N. Cohen, “Radar Design Principles”, McGraw Hill, 2nd Ed., 1969, 1991, pg. 381
  7. Eaves, J.L., Reedy, E.K., “Principles of Modern Radar”, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1987, pp.400-401 Peebles, P.Z., Jr., “Radar Principles”, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1998, pp.12-14
  8. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Samuel O.Piper
  9. Eaves, J.L., Reedy, E.K., “Principles of Modern Radar”, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1987, pp.404-408
  10. Eaves, J.L., Reedy, E.K., “Principles of Modern Radar”, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1987, pp.404-408
  11. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms” Hovanessian, S.A., “Radar System Design and Analysis”, Artech House, 1984, p. 78 - 81
  12. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  13. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  14. Scheer &amp; Kurtz Ed., “Coherent Radar Performance Estimation”, Artech House, 1993, pg.290
  15. Eaves, J.L., Reedy, E.K., “Principles of Modern Radar”, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1987, pp.409-411 Scheer &amp; Kurtz Ed., “Coherent Radar Performance Estimation”, Artech House, 1993, pg.290
  16. Scheer &amp; Kurtz Ed., “Coherent Radar Performance Estimation”, Artech House, 1993, pg.290
  17. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  18. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  19. Scheer &amp; Kurtz Ed., “Coherent Radar Performance Estimation”, Artech House, 1993, pg.290
  20. Scheer &amp; Kurtz Ed., “Coherent Radar Performance Estimation”, Artech House, 1993, pg.290
  21. Eaves, J.L., Reedy, E.K., “Principles of Modern Radar”, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1987, pp.409-411 Scheer &amp; Kurtz Ed., “Coherent Radar Performance Estimation”, Artech House, 1993, pg.290
  22. Scheer &amp; Kurtz Ed., “Coherent Radar Performance Estimation”, Artech House, 1993, pg.290
  23. Scheer &amp; Kurtz Ed., “Coherent Radar Performance Estimation”, Artech House, 1993, pg.290 Edde, B, “Radar – Principles, Technology, Applications”, Prentice Hall, 1993, pp. 317-320 Morris, G.V.,Ed., “Pulsed Doppler Radar”, Artech House, 1988, pp.286-291
  24. Edde, B, “Radar – Principles, Technology, Applications”, Prentice Hall, 1993, pp. 317-320 Skolnik, M.L. “Introduction to Radar Systems”, International Student Edition, Kogakusha Co., Ltd., Copyright McGraw Hill, 1962, Ch. 3, “CW and Frequency Modulated Radars”, pp. 89 – 92 Hovanessian, S.A., “Radar System Design and Analysis”, Artech House, 1984, pp. 81 - 84
  25. Scheer &amp; Kurtz Ed., “Coherent Radar Performance Estimation”, Artech House, 1993, pg.290 Edde, B, “Radar – Principles, Technology, Applications”, Prentice Hall, 1993, pp. 317-320
  26. Scheer &amp; Kurtz Ed., “Coherent Radar Performance Estimation”, Artech House, 1993, pg.290 Edde, B, “Radar – Principles, Technology, Applications”, Prentice Hall, 1993, pp. 317-320
  27. Scheer &amp; Kurtz Ed., “Coherent Radar Performance Estimation”, Artech House, 1993, pg.290 Edde, B, “Radar – Principles, Technology, Applications”, Prentice Hall, 1993, pp. 317-320
  28. Edde, B, “Radar – Principles, Technology, Applications”, Prentice Hall, 1993, pp. 317-320 Edde, B, “Radar – Principles, Technology, Applications”, Prentice Hall, 1993, pp. 317-320 Edde, B, “Radar – Principles, Technology, Applications”, Prentice Hall, 1993, pp. 317-320
  29. Eaves, J.L., Reedy, E.K., “Principles of Modern Radar”, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1987, pp. 414-416 Mahafza, B.R., “Radar Systems Analysis and Design Using MATLAB”, Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC, 2000, pp. 127-128 Skolnik, M.L. “Introduction to Radar Systems”, International Student Edition, Kogakusha Co., Ltd., Copyright McGraw Hill, 1962, Ch. 3, “CW and Frequency Modulated Radars”, pp. 106 – 111 Hovanessian, S.A., “Radar System Design and Analysis”, Artech House, 1984, p. 84 - 85 Mahafza, B.R., “Radar Systems Analysis and Design using MATLAB”, Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC,2000, pp.127-128
  30. Eaves, J.L., Reedy, E.K., “Principles of Modern Radar”, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1987, pp. 414-416 Mahafza, B.R., “Radar Systems Analysis and Design Using MATLAB”, Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC, 2000, pp. 127-128 Skolnik, M.L. “Introduction to Radar Systems”, International Student Edition, Kogakusha Co., Ltd., Copyright McGraw Hill, 1962, Ch. 3, “CW and Frequency Modulated Radars”, pp. 106 – 111 Hovanessian, S.A., “Radar System Design and Analysis”, Artech House, 1984, p. 84 - 85 Mahafza, B.R., “Radar Systems Analysis and Design using MATLAB”, Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC,2000, pp.127-128
  31. Eaves, J.L., Reedy, E.K., “Principles of Modern Radar”, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1987, pp. 416-420 Mahafza, B.R., “Radar Systems Analysis and Design Using MATLAB”, Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC, 2000, pp. 127-128 Skolnik, M.L. “Introduction to Radar Systems”, International Student Edition, Kogakusha Co., Ltd., Copyright McGraw Hill, 1962, Ch. 3, “CW and Frequency Modulated Radars”, pp. 106 – 111 Hovanessian, S.A., “Radar System Design and Analysis”, Artech House, 1984, p. 84 - 85
  32. Eaves, J.L., Reedy, E.K., “Principles of Modern Radar”, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1987, pp. 416-420 Mahafza, B.R., “Radar Systems Analysis and Design Using MATLAB”, Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC, 2000, pp. 127-128 Skolnik, M.L. “Introduction to Radar Systems”, International Student Edition, Kogakusha Co., Ltd., Copyright McGraw Hill, 1962, Ch. 3, “CW and Frequency Modulated Radars”, pp. 106 - 111
  33. Eaves, J.L., Reedy, E.K., “Principles of Modern Radar”, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1987, pp. 416-420
  34. Eaves, J.L., Reedy, E.K., “Principles of Modern Radar”, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1987, pp. 416-420
  35. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  36. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  37. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  38. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  39. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  40. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Samuel O.Piper
  41. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  42. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  43. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  44. http://russinoff.com/papers/crt.html http://www.cut-the-knot.org/blue/chinese.shtml http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_remainder_theorem D. Curtis Schleher, “MTI and Pulsed Doppler Radar”, Artech House, 1991, pp. 441-448 Y.H. Ku and Xiaoguang Sun, “The Chinese Remainder Theorem”, The Franklin Institute, vol. 329, No.1, pp. 93-97, 1992
  45. http://russinoff.com/papers/crt.html http://www.cut-the-knot.org/blue/chinese.shtml http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_remainder_theorem D. Curtis Schleher, “MTI and Pulsed Doppler Radar”, Artech House, 1991, pp. 441-448
  46. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_remainder_theorem D. Curtis Schleher, “MTI and Pulsed Doppler Radar”, Artech House, 1991, pp. 441-448
  47. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  48. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  49. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  50. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  51. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  52. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  53. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  54. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  55. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Jim Scheer, “Advanced Radar Waveforms”
  56. “Principles of Modern Radar” Georgia Tech, 2004, Samuel O.Piper