2. To have an understanding of observation
techniques.
To know the strength's and limitations of this
type of study.
3. In pairs Imagine that you were going into
the Big Brother house.
Brainstorm ways that you would change
your behaviour.
What wouldn’t you do?
What would you do?
Discuss in pairs.
5 minutes.
http://www.online-stopwatch.com/bomb-
countdown/
4. When conducting participative observational
research the observer must be involved in the
study groups everyday activities. They will
notice how they behave and how they speak.
A Number of issues can arise through this
method.
5. Non- participant: watches from a distance
and is not directly involved with
participants.
Participant : Researcher interacts with the
study group being observed.
Two types of participant observation:
1) Covert – subjects do not know they are
being studied.
2) Overt - Subjects are aware they are being
studied.
6. Research ethics :Duty of care the researcher
owes to participants.
Ethical principles :
Participants should be fully informed.
Participants should not be harmed.
Participants should not be specifically
identified.
7. This is a conflict between the ethical
principles and the aim of the research.
If the researcher asks for consent to observe
the participant's then they may act differently
– Demand characteristics.
If they don’t ask and participants are being
observed they may act more naturally.
8. Participant observation doesn't work unless
the researcher gains access to the group.
Many groups don't want to be studied.
May be hard to get a true representation of
the group.
Participant observations maybe more
effective as a longitudinal study.
9. Researchers want to observe people within
their natural environment.
They may want to take notes of what they
say and do but also they may want to record
information- this can be an ethical issue.
Sometimes the observer must play an active
role within the group rather in order to gain
more information.
10. Getting access – You may not be able to
access the environment you wish to observe.
Staying in - hard to maintain trust and keep
up your false identity.
Getting out : Not easy to stop participating
with group.
11. High Validity
Can study social interaction both verbal and
non verbal.
Empathy
Researcher can see from the same
perspective as the group.
Develops trust therefore more information
could be shared. Revealing secrets etc.
12. Low reliability.
Hard to replicate.
Often samples are not representative-
difficult to generalise.
Time consuming
Lots of pressure on individual
Data will be hard to quantify.
13. “ Glasgow gangs” James Patrick (1973)
“ Wheeling and dealing” Alder (1985)
“Italian gangs” (1973) William F Whyte
“ Cocaine Kids” ( 1986) Williams.
14. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=
2218940492996010738
During the video you are going to take
notes on :
Who is he studying?
How is he doing it?
Any problems?
Any ethical issues ?
Strengths of the study
15. Design your own observational study.
Include :
Who you are going to observe.
What your looking for.
Benefits of this type of study.
Problems you may face – ethics.
Due in 17th October.