SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
AXIAL LOAD TEST PROCEDURES FOR PILE FOUNDATIONS



INTRODUCTION

Because of the non-availability of reliable procedures for assessing the load transfer
mechanisms between piles and surrounding soil, or for determining the ultimate capacity
of piles, full-scale load tests are conducted. It is a standard practice to conduct load tests
in large projects either in the design phase or during construction. The significance of a
properly conducted load test is that it furnishes the actual soil resistance at the site upon
which design can be based reliably.

In practice, load tests are more commonly conducted to determine that the foundation is
capable of sustaining working loads with sufficient factor of safety. In other instances,
load transfer characteristics are required to identify the mechanism by which load is
transferred to the soil.

Load tests vary in their procedure, equipment, instrumentation, and load application
method. There are two types of tests conducted for axial types of loading, namely
compression tests and pullout (tension) tests. For compression tests, the load can be
applied either by adding dead weight or by hydraulic jacking. Direct application of dead
weight can be done with concrete or steel blocks, water tanks, sand bags or any other type
of weights. However, the use of this method has decreased considerably, and it became
more common to use hydraulic jacks to vary the load on the test pile, especially for high
loading conditions.


EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION

The arrangement for an axial compression test is generally done using either a dead load
platform, or a hydraulic jack with reaction (or anchor) piles. The hydraulic jack with
reaction piles arrangement (Figure 1) is used routinely in load testing. In order to
minimize the effect of stresses transferred from the reaction piles to the soil near the test
shaft, a minimum distance is required between the reaction piles and the test pile. It is
generally accepted to allow for a minimum spacing of 3 reaction pile diameters between
each reaction pile and the test pile, provided that this distance is greater than 5 ft (Hirany
and Kulhawy, 1988).

A reaction beam is installed on top of the reaction piles. The test pile is loaded by
utilizing a hydraulic jack that is placed on the center of the test pile. The applied load is
measured with a load cell placed between the hydraulic jack and the pile or by a pressure
gauge installed between the pump and the jack.
Instruments are primarily employed to record two types of movement in load tests. First
is the pile head (butt) movement and second are the incremental strain measurements
along the pile length. Measurements of the pile head movement is essential in all load
tests and is done by the use of dial gauges and/or surveying systems. The incremental
strain measurements along the pile length are taken only if load transfer distribution
needs to be determined. Instruments that can be installed for such measurements are the
telltales (strain rods) and electric strain gauges.

Several arrangements are possible for conducting pullout tests (Hirany and Kulhawy,
1988). However, two arrangements are more common than others. In the first setup as
indicated in Figure 2(a), a hydraulic jack is located between a beam and a reaction frame
that is anchored to the pile by a tension connection (or longitudinal steel rebars). The
reaction supports can be reaction piles or cribbing placed at each side of the test pile.

An alternative arrangement is shown in Figure 2(b) and is different in that the load is
applied by two hydraulic jacks acting on top of the reaction supports. In this setup, the
load on the test pile is taken as twice the jacking load. The instruments and measurements
for the pullout tests are similar to those for compression load tests.


TESTING PROCEDURES

Details of different testing procedures can be found in many publications (e.g. ASTM Dl
143-81, Fuller and Hoy, 1970, Crowther, 1988, Joshi and Sharma, 1987, Hirany and
Kulhawy, 1988). All methods cited in the literature are either stress-controlled or strain-
controlled.

Controlled-Stress Methods

Variations of the controlled-stress methods are described below.

Slow Maintained Load Test (SML)

In this method, the pile is loaded in equal increments of 25% of the design load up to
twice the design load. Each increment is maintained until a settlement of 0.01 in/hr is
reached. The maximum load is then held typically for 24 hours and then removed in
similar decrements. This kind of test is the ASTM standard procedure and the most
common test, especially in large projects. A typical test lasts between 1.5 to 3 days.

Quick Maintained Load Test (QML)

In this procedure, 15% of the design load is added at a time and held for 5 minutes. The
maximum load is equal to 3 times the design load. When the total load is reached,
unloading is then done with four equal decrements allowing 5 minutes between each two
decrements. Typical time of a load test can be between 3 to 5 hours.
This method has the advantage of being fast but it cannot be used where the pile is
installed in strata with significant creep properties because load may be shed from the
sides to the base without changes in the applied load (O’Neill and Hawkins, 1982).

Incremental Equilibrium Test (IE)

This test is a modification of the SML test and takes only about one-third of the SML test
duration.     Although the test is faster, the IE test was reported to provide similar
correlations to the SML test (Fellenius, 1975). The IE test is conducted by applying
increments of 15% to 25% of the design load and maintaining that load for about 10
minutes. The load then is allowed to drop (with the increase in settlement) until it
becomes constant. At this point, equilibrium between the load and displacement is
reached and the next increment is applied.

Constant-Time Interval Test (CTI)

Loading using this method is the same as that for the SML procedure. However, each
load is maintained for exactly one hour. This procedure has a typical duration of about
10 hours.

Cyclic Test (CYC)

The cyclic test is conducted by a series of loading and unloading to the maximum test
load. The rate of loading can be similar to that of the SML or CTI procedures. This test
can be used where there is a need to determine the load at which creep displacements
exceed certain limits. This procedure is time-consuming and is not typically used for
routine load testing.


Controlled-Strain Methods

The controlled-strain methods are divided into two categories:

Constant-Rate Penetration Test (CRP)

In this test, the pile is made to penetrate the soil at a pre-determined constant rate, while
the load applied is measured continuously. Average rates are 0.03 in/min for cohesive
soils and 0.06 in/min for granular soils. The test can be performed in less than one hour,
but it requires special equipment and trained personnel.

Constant Settlement Increment Test (CSI)

In this procedure, the load increments are determined from the load necessary to produce
uniform increments of settlement of the pile head. Typical settlements are of the
magnitude of 1% of the pile diameter. The load increment is varied in order to maintain
the settlement magnitude.
Even though the slow maintained-load test is considered the standard procedure, other
methods of testing such as the QML and CRP have been increasingly used where
allowed in the local building codes and generally yield consistent results with the
standard SML test method. These other testing procedures are recommended as adequate
testing procedures by Fuller and Hoy, 1970 and Reese and O’Neill, 1988.
FIGURE 1

  Test arrangement for compression loading (ASTM-D1143, 1987)




                            FIGURE 2

Two schemes for uplift loading testing (O'Rourke and Kulhawy, 1985)
REFERENCES


American Society for Testing and Materials (1987) “Standard Method for Testing Piles
Under Static Axial Compressive Load (Dl 143),” Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 4.08,
ASTM, Philadelphia, pp. 237-252.

Crowther, C. L. (1988) Load Testing of Deep Foundation. John Wiley & Sons, New
York.

Fellenius, B. H. (1975) “Test Loading of Piles and New Proof Testing Procedure,” J.
Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. GT9, pp. 855-869.

Fuller, F M. and Hoy, H. E. (1970) “Pile Load Tests Including Quick Load Test Method,
Conventional Methods, and Interpretations,” Research Record 333, Highway Research
Board, Washington, D.C., pp. 74-86.

Hirany, A. and Kulhawy, F. (1988) “Conduct and Interpretation of Load Tests on Drilled
Shaft Foundations: Detailed Guidelines, Report EL-5915, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA.

Joshi, R. C. and Sharma, H. D. (1987) “Prediction of Ultimate Pile Capacity from Load
Tests on Bored and Belled, Expanded Base Compacted and Driven Piles,” Proceedings,
International Symposium of Prediction and Performance in Geotechnical Engineering,
Calgary, Canada, pp. 135-144.

O’Neill, M. W and Hawkins, R. A. (1982) “Pile-Head Behavior of Rigidly Capped Pile
Group,” Transportation Research Record 884, Transportation Research Board,
Washington, D.C., pp. 1-7.

O’Rourke, T D. and Kulhawy, F H. (1985) “Observations on Load Tests on Drilled
Shafts,” Drilled Piers and Caissons II, Ed. C. N. Baker, ASCE, New York, pp. 113-128.

Reese, L C. and O’Neill, M. W. (1988) “Drilled Shafts: Construction Procedures and
Design Methods,” U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA-HI-88-042, Dallas, Texas.

More Related Content

What's hot

Studies on impact of inlet viscosity ratio, decay rate & length scales in a c...
Studies on impact of inlet viscosity ratio, decay rate & length scales in a c...Studies on impact of inlet viscosity ratio, decay rate & length scales in a c...
Studies on impact of inlet viscosity ratio, decay rate & length scales in a c...QuEST Global
 
Dynamic pile testing
Dynamic pile testingDynamic pile testing
Dynamic pile testingSravan Muguda
 
Presentation (Pagkratios Chitas)
Presentation (Pagkratios Chitas)Presentation (Pagkratios Chitas)
Presentation (Pagkratios Chitas)Pagkratios Chitas
 
A Review on “Investigation of Heat Transfer Enhancement of Flow over the dimp...
A Review on “Investigation of Heat Transfer Enhancement of Flow over the dimp...A Review on “Investigation of Heat Transfer Enhancement of Flow over the dimp...
A Review on “Investigation of Heat Transfer Enhancement of Flow over the dimp...IRJET Journal
 
Behavior of axially loaded drilled shafts in Beaumont clay part 4
Behavior of axially loaded drilled shafts in Beaumont clay part 4Behavior of axially loaded drilled shafts in Beaumont clay part 4
Behavior of axially loaded drilled shafts in Beaumont clay part 4Cathleen Cheong
 
Numerical investigation of flow characteristics in a
Numerical investigation of flow characteristics in aNumerical investigation of flow characteristics in a
Numerical investigation of flow characteristics in aIAEME Publication
 
Design & optimization of LNG-CNG cylinder for optimum weight
Design & optimization of LNG-CNG cylinder for optimum weightDesign & optimization of LNG-CNG cylinder for optimum weight
Design & optimization of LNG-CNG cylinder for optimum weightijsrd.com
 
Measurement of Flow Rate and Impact Force on Different Vanes through Impact o...
Measurement of Flow Rate and Impact Force on Different Vanes through Impact o...Measurement of Flow Rate and Impact Force on Different Vanes through Impact o...
Measurement of Flow Rate and Impact Force on Different Vanes through Impact o...Farzad Hossain
 
A Computational Analysis of Flow Development through a Constant Area C- Duct
A Computational Analysis of Flow Development through a Constant Area C- DuctA Computational Analysis of Flow Development through a Constant Area C- Duct
A Computational Analysis of Flow Development through a Constant Area C- DuctIJERA Editor
 
Graphical Method to Determine Minimum Cutting Fluid Velocity for Effective Ho...
Graphical Method to Determine Minimum Cutting Fluid Velocity for Effective Ho...Graphical Method to Determine Minimum Cutting Fluid Velocity for Effective Ho...
Graphical Method to Determine Minimum Cutting Fluid Velocity for Effective Ho...IRJET Journal
 
Effect of staggered roughness elements on flow characteristics in rectangular...
Effect of staggered roughness elements on flow characteristics in rectangular...Effect of staggered roughness elements on flow characteristics in rectangular...
Effect of staggered roughness elements on flow characteristics in rectangular...eSAT Publishing House
 
IRJET- A Comparative Study of Design of DAM
IRJET- A Comparative Study of Design of DAMIRJET- A Comparative Study of Design of DAM
IRJET- A Comparative Study of Design of DAMIRJET Journal
 
Improving Operability of Lab-Scale Spouted Bed Using Global Stochastic Optimi...
Improving Operability of Lab-Scale Spouted Bed Using Global Stochastic Optimi...Improving Operability of Lab-Scale Spouted Bed Using Global Stochastic Optimi...
Improving Operability of Lab-Scale Spouted Bed Using Global Stochastic Optimi...IJERA Editor
 
IRJET-Deriving One Dimensional Shallow Water Equations from Mass and Momentum...
IRJET-Deriving One Dimensional Shallow Water Equations from Mass and Momentum...IRJET-Deriving One Dimensional Shallow Water Equations from Mass and Momentum...
IRJET-Deriving One Dimensional Shallow Water Equations from Mass and Momentum...IRJET Journal
 
19910001020 comparison of nastran analysis with gvt results of uh-60 a
19910001020  comparison of nastran analysis with gvt results of uh-60 a19910001020  comparison of nastran analysis with gvt results of uh-60 a
19910001020 comparison of nastran analysis with gvt results of uh-60 aRonaldJones54
 
The Elastic-plastic Deformation Analysis of the Hydraulic Pipe under Equivale...
The Elastic-plastic Deformation Analysis of the Hydraulic Pipe under Equivale...The Elastic-plastic Deformation Analysis of the Hydraulic Pipe under Equivale...
The Elastic-plastic Deformation Analysis of the Hydraulic Pipe under Equivale...IOSR Journals
 
IRJET-A Review on Advances in the Design and Analysis of Draft Tube for React...
IRJET-A Review on Advances in the Design and Analysis of Draft Tube for React...IRJET-A Review on Advances in the Design and Analysis of Draft Tube for React...
IRJET-A Review on Advances in the Design and Analysis of Draft Tube for React...IRJET Journal
 

What's hot (20)

Studies on impact of inlet viscosity ratio, decay rate & length scales in a c...
Studies on impact of inlet viscosity ratio, decay rate & length scales in a c...Studies on impact of inlet viscosity ratio, decay rate & length scales in a c...
Studies on impact of inlet viscosity ratio, decay rate & length scales in a c...
 
Dynamic pile testing
Dynamic pile testingDynamic pile testing
Dynamic pile testing
 
Presentation (Pagkratios Chitas)
Presentation (Pagkratios Chitas)Presentation (Pagkratios Chitas)
Presentation (Pagkratios Chitas)
 
A Review on “Investigation of Heat Transfer Enhancement of Flow over the dimp...
A Review on “Investigation of Heat Transfer Enhancement of Flow over the dimp...A Review on “Investigation of Heat Transfer Enhancement of Flow over the dimp...
A Review on “Investigation of Heat Transfer Enhancement of Flow over the dimp...
 
Behavior of axially loaded drilled shafts in Beaumont clay part 4
Behavior of axially loaded drilled shafts in Beaumont clay part 4Behavior of axially loaded drilled shafts in Beaumont clay part 4
Behavior of axially loaded drilled shafts in Beaumont clay part 4
 
D012473845
D012473845D012473845
D012473845
 
Numerical investigation of flow characteristics in a
Numerical investigation of flow characteristics in aNumerical investigation of flow characteristics in a
Numerical investigation of flow characteristics in a
 
Design & optimization of LNG-CNG cylinder for optimum weight
Design & optimization of LNG-CNG cylinder for optimum weightDesign & optimization of LNG-CNG cylinder for optimum weight
Design & optimization of LNG-CNG cylinder for optimum weight
 
Measurement of Flow Rate and Impact Force on Different Vanes through Impact o...
Measurement of Flow Rate and Impact Force on Different Vanes through Impact o...Measurement of Flow Rate and Impact Force on Different Vanes through Impact o...
Measurement of Flow Rate and Impact Force on Different Vanes through Impact o...
 
A Computational Analysis of Flow Development through a Constant Area C- Duct
A Computational Analysis of Flow Development through a Constant Area C- DuctA Computational Analysis of Flow Development through a Constant Area C- Duct
A Computational Analysis of Flow Development through a Constant Area C- Duct
 
Graphical Method to Determine Minimum Cutting Fluid Velocity for Effective Ho...
Graphical Method to Determine Minimum Cutting Fluid Velocity for Effective Ho...Graphical Method to Determine Minimum Cutting Fluid Velocity for Effective Ho...
Graphical Method to Determine Minimum Cutting Fluid Velocity for Effective Ho...
 
Effect of staggered roughness elements on flow characteristics in rectangular...
Effect of staggered roughness elements on flow characteristics in rectangular...Effect of staggered roughness elements on flow characteristics in rectangular...
Effect of staggered roughness elements on flow characteristics in rectangular...
 
IRJET- A Comparative Study of Design of DAM
IRJET- A Comparative Study of Design of DAMIRJET- A Comparative Study of Design of DAM
IRJET- A Comparative Study of Design of DAM
 
Lj3619451955
Lj3619451955Lj3619451955
Lj3619451955
 
Improving Operability of Lab-Scale Spouted Bed Using Global Stochastic Optimi...
Improving Operability of Lab-Scale Spouted Bed Using Global Stochastic Optimi...Improving Operability of Lab-Scale Spouted Bed Using Global Stochastic Optimi...
Improving Operability of Lab-Scale Spouted Bed Using Global Stochastic Optimi...
 
Finite element analysis of arch dam
Finite element analysis of arch damFinite element analysis of arch dam
Finite element analysis of arch dam
 
IRJET-Deriving One Dimensional Shallow Water Equations from Mass and Momentum...
IRJET-Deriving One Dimensional Shallow Water Equations from Mass and Momentum...IRJET-Deriving One Dimensional Shallow Water Equations from Mass and Momentum...
IRJET-Deriving One Dimensional Shallow Water Equations from Mass and Momentum...
 
19910001020 comparison of nastran analysis with gvt results of uh-60 a
19910001020  comparison of nastran analysis with gvt results of uh-60 a19910001020  comparison of nastran analysis with gvt results of uh-60 a
19910001020 comparison of nastran analysis with gvt results of uh-60 a
 
The Elastic-plastic Deformation Analysis of the Hydraulic Pipe under Equivale...
The Elastic-plastic Deformation Analysis of the Hydraulic Pipe under Equivale...The Elastic-plastic Deformation Analysis of the Hydraulic Pipe under Equivale...
The Elastic-plastic Deformation Analysis of the Hydraulic Pipe under Equivale...
 
IRJET-A Review on Advances in the Design and Analysis of Draft Tube for React...
IRJET-A Review on Advances in the Design and Analysis of Draft Tube for React...IRJET-A Review on Advances in the Design and Analysis of Draft Tube for React...
IRJET-A Review on Advances in the Design and Analysis of Draft Tube for React...
 

Viewers also liked

ملف تعريفي عن الأسرة
ملف تعريفي عن الأسرة ملف تعريفي عن الأسرة
ملف تعريفي عن الأسرة islamhanafi
 
Why Civil Engineering is Best
Why Civil Engineering is BestWhy Civil Engineering is Best
Why Civil Engineering is BestRahul Chavda
 
Introduction to Civil Engineering
Introduction to Civil Engineering Introduction to Civil Engineering
Introduction to Civil Engineering Umer Farooq
 
Civil Engineering (Beams,Columns)
Civil Engineering (Beams,Columns)Civil Engineering (Beams,Columns)
Civil Engineering (Beams,Columns)mbrsalman
 

Viewers also liked (7)

ملف تعريفي عن الأسرة
ملف تعريفي عن الأسرة ملف تعريفي عن الأسرة
ملف تعريفي عن الأسرة
 
Why Civil Engineering is Best
Why Civil Engineering is BestWhy Civil Engineering is Best
Why Civil Engineering is Best
 
Introduction to Civil Engineering
Introduction to Civil EngineeringIntroduction to Civil Engineering
Introduction to Civil Engineering
 
Civil Engineering
Civil EngineeringCivil Engineering
Civil Engineering
 
Introduction to Civil Engineering
Introduction to Civil Engineering Introduction to Civil Engineering
Introduction to Civil Engineering
 
Civil engineering
Civil engineeringCivil engineering
Civil engineering
 
Civil Engineering (Beams,Columns)
Civil Engineering (Beams,Columns)Civil Engineering (Beams,Columns)
Civil Engineering (Beams,Columns)
 

Similar to Axial%20 load%20test%20procedures%20for%20pile%20foundations

Part 1 introduction to triaxial testing
Part 1 introduction to triaxial testingPart 1 introduction to triaxial testing
Part 1 introduction to triaxial testingJohn Tran
 
Pullout test as nondestructive test method in structural engineering
Pullout test as nondestructive test method in structural engineeringPullout test as nondestructive test method in structural engineering
Pullout test as nondestructive test method in structural engineeringMohammed Layth
 
Time Dependent Settlement Response Model of Tested Piles in Coastal Region of...
Time Dependent Settlement Response Model of Tested Piles in Coastal Region of...Time Dependent Settlement Response Model of Tested Piles in Coastal Region of...
Time Dependent Settlement Response Model of Tested Piles in Coastal Region of...ijtsrd
 
Laboratory experimental study and elastic wave velocity on physical propertie...
Laboratory experimental study and elastic wave velocity on physical propertie...Laboratory experimental study and elastic wave velocity on physical propertie...
Laboratory experimental study and elastic wave velocity on physical propertie...HoangTienTrung1
 
Pullout test as a nondestructive test method in structural engineering
Pullout test as a nondestructive test method in structural engineering Pullout test as a nondestructive test method in structural engineering
Pullout test as a nondestructive test method in structural engineering Ahmed Abdullah
 
Astm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soils
Astm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soilsAstm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soils
Astm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soilsnktivan
 
Pavior's Laing Award Travel 2016 Report (Andri Setiawan)
Pavior's Laing Award Travel 2016 Report (Andri Setiawan)Pavior's Laing Award Travel 2016 Report (Andri Setiawan)
Pavior's Laing Award Travel 2016 Report (Andri Setiawan)Andri Setiawan
 
Sellountou evalaución integridad de pilotes
Sellountou   evalaución integridad de pilotesSellountou   evalaución integridad de pilotes
Sellountou evalaución integridad de pilotescfpbolivia
 
Blakeborough e williams, 2003
Blakeborough e williams, 2003Blakeborough e williams, 2003
Blakeborough e williams, 2003nandalago
 
Experimental and Analytical Study on Uplift Capacity -Formatted Paper.pdf
Experimental and Analytical Study on Uplift Capacity -Formatted Paper.pdfExperimental and Analytical Study on Uplift Capacity -Formatted Paper.pdf
Experimental and Analytical Study on Uplift Capacity -Formatted Paper.pdfSamirsinh Parmar
 
A new reciprocating tribometer for wear testing under different
A new reciprocating tribometer for wear testing under differentA new reciprocating tribometer for wear testing under different
A new reciprocating tribometer for wear testing under differentAhmed Abdelbary
 
DYNAMIC FIELD TESTING of concrete - Various test
DYNAMIC FIELD TESTING of concrete - Various testDYNAMIC FIELD TESTING of concrete - Various test
DYNAMIC FIELD TESTING of concrete - Various testManpreetSinghBains
 
Creep of timber columns 7 6-3
Creep of timber columns 7 6-3Creep of timber columns 7 6-3
Creep of timber columns 7 6-3Everaldo Pletz
 
Direct shear test triaxial test
Direct shear test triaxial testDirect shear test triaxial test
Direct shear test triaxial testKashif Hashmi
 
Soil test Training for Hawassa University.pptx
Soil test Training for Hawassa University.pptxSoil test Training for Hawassa University.pptx
Soil test Training for Hawassa University.pptxHeniyit
 
Triaxial test on soil important insights -formatted paper
Triaxial test on soil   important insights -formatted paperTriaxial test on soil   important insights -formatted paper
Triaxial test on soil important insights -formatted paperSamirsinh Parmar
 

Similar to Axial%20 load%20test%20procedures%20for%20pile%20foundations (20)

D2435 consolidaccion
D2435 consolidaccionD2435 consolidaccion
D2435 consolidaccion
 
Part 1 introduction to triaxial testing
Part 1 introduction to triaxial testingPart 1 introduction to triaxial testing
Part 1 introduction to triaxial testing
 
Pullout test as nondestructive test method in structural engineering
Pullout test as nondestructive test method in structural engineeringPullout test as nondestructive test method in structural engineering
Pullout test as nondestructive test method in structural engineering
 
Time Dependent Settlement Response Model of Tested Piles in Coastal Region of...
Time Dependent Settlement Response Model of Tested Piles in Coastal Region of...Time Dependent Settlement Response Model of Tested Piles in Coastal Region of...
Time Dependent Settlement Response Model of Tested Piles in Coastal Region of...
 
Laboratory experimental study and elastic wave velocity on physical propertie...
Laboratory experimental study and elastic wave velocity on physical propertie...Laboratory experimental study and elastic wave velocity on physical propertie...
Laboratory experimental study and elastic wave velocity on physical propertie...
 
Pullout test as a nondestructive test method in structural engineering
Pullout test as a nondestructive test method in structural engineering Pullout test as a nondestructive test method in structural engineering
Pullout test as a nondestructive test method in structural engineering
 
Astm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soils
Astm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soilsAstm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soils
Astm d 4767_95_triaxial_cu_cohesive_soils
 
Tensile
TensileTensile
Tensile
 
Pavior's Laing Award Travel 2016 Report (Andri Setiawan)
Pavior's Laing Award Travel 2016 Report (Andri Setiawan)Pavior's Laing Award Travel 2016 Report (Andri Setiawan)
Pavior's Laing Award Travel 2016 Report (Andri Setiawan)
 
C29C29M.PDF
C29C29M.PDFC29C29M.PDF
C29C29M.PDF
 
Sellountou evalaución integridad de pilotes
Sellountou   evalaución integridad de pilotesSellountou   evalaución integridad de pilotes
Sellountou evalaución integridad de pilotes
 
Blakeborough e williams, 2003
Blakeborough e williams, 2003Blakeborough e williams, 2003
Blakeborough e williams, 2003
 
Experimental and Analytical Study on Uplift Capacity -Formatted Paper.pdf
Experimental and Analytical Study on Uplift Capacity -Formatted Paper.pdfExperimental and Analytical Study on Uplift Capacity -Formatted Paper.pdf
Experimental and Analytical Study on Uplift Capacity -Formatted Paper.pdf
 
A new reciprocating tribometer for wear testing under different
A new reciprocating tribometer for wear testing under differentA new reciprocating tribometer for wear testing under different
A new reciprocating tribometer for wear testing under different
 
DYNAMIC FIELD TESTING of concrete - Various test
DYNAMIC FIELD TESTING of concrete - Various testDYNAMIC FIELD TESTING of concrete - Various test
DYNAMIC FIELD TESTING of concrete - Various test
 
Creep of timber columns 7 6-3
Creep of timber columns 7 6-3Creep of timber columns 7 6-3
Creep of timber columns 7 6-3
 
Direct shear test triaxial test
Direct shear test triaxial testDirect shear test triaxial test
Direct shear test triaxial test
 
maturity.pdf
maturity.pdfmaturity.pdf
maturity.pdf
 
Soil test Training for Hawassa University.pptx
Soil test Training for Hawassa University.pptxSoil test Training for Hawassa University.pptx
Soil test Training for Hawassa University.pptx
 
Triaxial test on soil important insights -formatted paper
Triaxial test on soil   important insights -formatted paperTriaxial test on soil   important insights -formatted paper
Triaxial test on soil important insights -formatted paper
 

More from Siddhartha Bhamidipati (18)

Gen. ref. book
Gen. ref. bookGen. ref. book
Gen. ref. book
 
Ch 4-water
Ch 4-waterCh 4-water
Ch 4-water
 
ISO 9001 -2008
ISO  9001 -2008ISO  9001 -2008
ISO 9001 -2008
 
Rev 01 dt 01.03.2010 - soil investigation
Rev 01 dt 01.03.2010 - soil investigationRev 01 dt 01.03.2010 - soil investigation
Rev 01 dt 01.03.2010 - soil investigation
 
4648
46484648
4648
 
432 1
432 1432 1
432 1
 
1200 5
1200 51200 5
1200 5
 
1200 5
1200 51200 5
1200 5
 
1200 4
1200 41200 4
1200 4
 
1200 3
1200 31200 3
1200 3
 
1200 2
1200 21200 2
1200 2
 
1200 1
1200 11200 1
1200 1
 
1199
11991199
1199
 
784
784784
784
 
783
783783
783
 
Ac02 nit
Ac02 nitAc02 nit
Ac02 nit
 
Ac02 itt
Ac02 ittAc02 itt
Ac02 itt
 
construction safety
construction safetyconstruction safety
construction safety
 

Axial%20 load%20test%20procedures%20for%20pile%20foundations

  • 1. AXIAL LOAD TEST PROCEDURES FOR PILE FOUNDATIONS INTRODUCTION Because of the non-availability of reliable procedures for assessing the load transfer mechanisms between piles and surrounding soil, or for determining the ultimate capacity of piles, full-scale load tests are conducted. It is a standard practice to conduct load tests in large projects either in the design phase or during construction. The significance of a properly conducted load test is that it furnishes the actual soil resistance at the site upon which design can be based reliably. In practice, load tests are more commonly conducted to determine that the foundation is capable of sustaining working loads with sufficient factor of safety. In other instances, load transfer characteristics are required to identify the mechanism by which load is transferred to the soil. Load tests vary in their procedure, equipment, instrumentation, and load application method. There are two types of tests conducted for axial types of loading, namely compression tests and pullout (tension) tests. For compression tests, the load can be applied either by adding dead weight or by hydraulic jacking. Direct application of dead weight can be done with concrete or steel blocks, water tanks, sand bags or any other type of weights. However, the use of this method has decreased considerably, and it became more common to use hydraulic jacks to vary the load on the test pile, especially for high loading conditions. EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION The arrangement for an axial compression test is generally done using either a dead load platform, or a hydraulic jack with reaction (or anchor) piles. The hydraulic jack with reaction piles arrangement (Figure 1) is used routinely in load testing. In order to minimize the effect of stresses transferred from the reaction piles to the soil near the test shaft, a minimum distance is required between the reaction piles and the test pile. It is generally accepted to allow for a minimum spacing of 3 reaction pile diameters between each reaction pile and the test pile, provided that this distance is greater than 5 ft (Hirany and Kulhawy, 1988). A reaction beam is installed on top of the reaction piles. The test pile is loaded by utilizing a hydraulic jack that is placed on the center of the test pile. The applied load is measured with a load cell placed between the hydraulic jack and the pile or by a pressure gauge installed between the pump and the jack.
  • 2. Instruments are primarily employed to record two types of movement in load tests. First is the pile head (butt) movement and second are the incremental strain measurements along the pile length. Measurements of the pile head movement is essential in all load tests and is done by the use of dial gauges and/or surveying systems. The incremental strain measurements along the pile length are taken only if load transfer distribution needs to be determined. Instruments that can be installed for such measurements are the telltales (strain rods) and electric strain gauges. Several arrangements are possible for conducting pullout tests (Hirany and Kulhawy, 1988). However, two arrangements are more common than others. In the first setup as indicated in Figure 2(a), a hydraulic jack is located between a beam and a reaction frame that is anchored to the pile by a tension connection (or longitudinal steel rebars). The reaction supports can be reaction piles or cribbing placed at each side of the test pile. An alternative arrangement is shown in Figure 2(b) and is different in that the load is applied by two hydraulic jacks acting on top of the reaction supports. In this setup, the load on the test pile is taken as twice the jacking load. The instruments and measurements for the pullout tests are similar to those for compression load tests. TESTING PROCEDURES Details of different testing procedures can be found in many publications (e.g. ASTM Dl 143-81, Fuller and Hoy, 1970, Crowther, 1988, Joshi and Sharma, 1987, Hirany and Kulhawy, 1988). All methods cited in the literature are either stress-controlled or strain- controlled. Controlled-Stress Methods Variations of the controlled-stress methods are described below. Slow Maintained Load Test (SML) In this method, the pile is loaded in equal increments of 25% of the design load up to twice the design load. Each increment is maintained until a settlement of 0.01 in/hr is reached. The maximum load is then held typically for 24 hours and then removed in similar decrements. This kind of test is the ASTM standard procedure and the most common test, especially in large projects. A typical test lasts between 1.5 to 3 days. Quick Maintained Load Test (QML) In this procedure, 15% of the design load is added at a time and held for 5 minutes. The maximum load is equal to 3 times the design load. When the total load is reached, unloading is then done with four equal decrements allowing 5 minutes between each two decrements. Typical time of a load test can be between 3 to 5 hours.
  • 3. This method has the advantage of being fast but it cannot be used where the pile is installed in strata with significant creep properties because load may be shed from the sides to the base without changes in the applied load (O’Neill and Hawkins, 1982). Incremental Equilibrium Test (IE) This test is a modification of the SML test and takes only about one-third of the SML test duration. Although the test is faster, the IE test was reported to provide similar correlations to the SML test (Fellenius, 1975). The IE test is conducted by applying increments of 15% to 25% of the design load and maintaining that load for about 10 minutes. The load then is allowed to drop (with the increase in settlement) until it becomes constant. At this point, equilibrium between the load and displacement is reached and the next increment is applied. Constant-Time Interval Test (CTI) Loading using this method is the same as that for the SML procedure. However, each load is maintained for exactly one hour. This procedure has a typical duration of about 10 hours. Cyclic Test (CYC) The cyclic test is conducted by a series of loading and unloading to the maximum test load. The rate of loading can be similar to that of the SML or CTI procedures. This test can be used where there is a need to determine the load at which creep displacements exceed certain limits. This procedure is time-consuming and is not typically used for routine load testing. Controlled-Strain Methods The controlled-strain methods are divided into two categories: Constant-Rate Penetration Test (CRP) In this test, the pile is made to penetrate the soil at a pre-determined constant rate, while the load applied is measured continuously. Average rates are 0.03 in/min for cohesive soils and 0.06 in/min for granular soils. The test can be performed in less than one hour, but it requires special equipment and trained personnel. Constant Settlement Increment Test (CSI) In this procedure, the load increments are determined from the load necessary to produce uniform increments of settlement of the pile head. Typical settlements are of the magnitude of 1% of the pile diameter. The load increment is varied in order to maintain the settlement magnitude.
  • 4. Even though the slow maintained-load test is considered the standard procedure, other methods of testing such as the QML and CRP have been increasingly used where allowed in the local building codes and generally yield consistent results with the standard SML test method. These other testing procedures are recommended as adequate testing procedures by Fuller and Hoy, 1970 and Reese and O’Neill, 1988.
  • 5. FIGURE 1 Test arrangement for compression loading (ASTM-D1143, 1987) FIGURE 2 Two schemes for uplift loading testing (O'Rourke and Kulhawy, 1985)
  • 6. REFERENCES American Society for Testing and Materials (1987) “Standard Method for Testing Piles Under Static Axial Compressive Load (Dl 143),” Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 4.08, ASTM, Philadelphia, pp. 237-252. Crowther, C. L. (1988) Load Testing of Deep Foundation. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Fellenius, B. H. (1975) “Test Loading of Piles and New Proof Testing Procedure,” J. Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. GT9, pp. 855-869. Fuller, F M. and Hoy, H. E. (1970) “Pile Load Tests Including Quick Load Test Method, Conventional Methods, and Interpretations,” Research Record 333, Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp. 74-86. Hirany, A. and Kulhawy, F. (1988) “Conduct and Interpretation of Load Tests on Drilled Shaft Foundations: Detailed Guidelines, Report EL-5915, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA. Joshi, R. C. and Sharma, H. D. (1987) “Prediction of Ultimate Pile Capacity from Load Tests on Bored and Belled, Expanded Base Compacted and Driven Piles,” Proceedings, International Symposium of Prediction and Performance in Geotechnical Engineering, Calgary, Canada, pp. 135-144. O’Neill, M. W and Hawkins, R. A. (1982) “Pile-Head Behavior of Rigidly Capped Pile Group,” Transportation Research Record 884, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp. 1-7. O’Rourke, T D. and Kulhawy, F H. (1985) “Observations on Load Tests on Drilled Shafts,” Drilled Piers and Caissons II, Ed. C. N. Baker, ASCE, New York, pp. 113-128. Reese, L C. and O’Neill, M. W. (1988) “Drilled Shafts: Construction Procedures and Design Methods,” U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA-HI-88-042, Dallas, Texas.