SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 1
1994, the Regional Trial Court of Makati, Metro Manila,
CORPO: CLOSE CORPORATION                                          Branch 63 (Civil Case 89-3511) rendered judgment,
                                                                  dismissing SJSSFI's complaint, finding that Nenita Lee
San Juan Structural and Steel Fabricator[GR 129459,               Gutenberg was not authorized by the corporation to
    29                September               1998]               dispose of the property as such disposition is governed by
    First Division, Panganiban (J): 4 concur                      the requirements of Section 40, Corporation Code; and
                                                                  that Nenita Lee Gutenberg did not in anyway misrepresent
Facts: On 14 February 1989, San Juan Structural and Steel         herself to be authorized by the corporation to sell the
Fabricators, Inc. (SJSSFI) entered into an agreement with         property to SJSSFI. The trial court also dismissed the
Motorich Sales Corporation (MSC) for the transfer to it of        counterclaim. SJSSFI appealed. On 18 March 1997, the
a parcel of land identified as Lot 30, Block 1 of the             Court of Appeals (CA GR CV 46801) modified the
Acropolis Greens Subdivision located in the District of           decision of the trial court by ordering Nenita Lee
Murphy, Quezon City, Metro Manila, containing an area of          Gutenberg to refund or return to SJSSFI the
414 square meters, covered by TCT (362909) 2876 (the lot          downpayment of P100,000.00 which she received from the
was still registered in the name of ACL Development               latter. SJSSFI moved for reconsideration, which was denied
Corporation [ADC] at that time). As stipulated in the             by the appellate court on 10 June 1997. SJSSFI filed the
Agreement of 14 February 1989, SJSSFI paid the                    Petition for Review on Certiorari. SJSSFI argues, among
downpayment in the sum of P100,000.00, the balance to             others, that the veil of corporate fiction of MSC
be paid on or before 2 March 1989. On 1 March 1989, Mr.           should be pierced, because the latter is a close
Andres T. Co, SJSSFI president, wrote a letter to MSC             corporation. Since "Spouses Reynaldo L. Gruenberg
requesting for a computation of the balance to be paid.           and Nenita R. Gruenberg owned all or almost all or
Said letter was coursed through MSC's broker, Linda               99.866% to be accurate, of the subscribed capital
Aduca, who wrote the computation of the balance. On 2             stock" 25 of Motorich, petitioner argues that Gruenberg
March 1989, SJSSFI was ready with the amount                      needed no authorization from the board to enter into the
corresponding to the balance, covered by Metrobank                subject contract. It adds that, being solely owned by
Cashier's Check 004223, payable to MSC. SJSSFI and MSC            the Spouses Gruenberg the company can be treated
were supposed to meet in the office of SJSSFI but MSC's           as a close corporation which can be bound by the acts
treasurer, Nenita Lee Gruenberg, did not appear. MSC,             of its principal stockholder who needs no specific
despite repeated demands and in utter disregard of its            authority.
commitments had refused to execute the Transfer of
Rights/Deed of Assignment which is necessary to transfer          Issue: Whether MSC is a close corporation, based on the
the certificate of title. On 6 April 1989, ADC and MSC            fact that almost all of the shares of stock of the
entered into a Deed of Absolute Sale whereby the former           corporation are owned by said treasurer and her husband.
transferred to the latter the subject property. By reason of      Held: Section 96 of the Corporation Code defines a close
said transfer, the Registry of Deeds of Quezon City issued        corporation provides that "A close corporation, within the
a new title in the name of MSC, represented by Nenita Lee         meaning of this Code, is one whose articles of
Gruenberg and Reynaldo L Gruenberg, under Transfer                incorporation provide that: (1) All of the corporation's
Certificate of Title 3571. SJSSFI filed the complaint for         issued stock of all classes, exclusive of treasury shares,
damages against MSC, and Nenita Lee Gruenberg, as a               shall be held of record by not more than a specified
result of the latter’s alleged bad faith in refusing to execute   number of persons, not exceeding twenty (20); (2) All of
a formal Transfer of Rights/Deed of Assignment. It                the issued stock of all classes shall be subject to one or
impleaded ADC and JNM Realty & Development Corp.                  more specified restrictions on transfer permitted by this
(JRDC) as necessary parties, since Transfer Certificate of        Title; and (3) The corporation shall not list in any stock
Title (362909) 2876 was in the name of ADC, and that              exchange or make any public offering of any of its stock
JRDC is the transferor of right in favor of MDC.                  of any class. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a corporation
        In its answer, MSC and Nenita Lee Gruenberg               shall be deemed not a close corporation when at least two-
interposed as affirmative defense that the President and          thirds (2/3) of its voting stock or voting rights is owned or
Chairman of Motorich did not sign the agreement                   controlled by another corporation which is not a close
adverted to; that Mrs. Gruenberg's signature on the               corporation within the meaning of this Code."
agreement is inadequate to bind MSC as the other                           The articles of incorporation of MSC does not
signature, that of Mr. Reynaldo Gruenberg, President and          contain any provision stating that (1) the number of
Chairman of MSC, is required; that SJSSFI knew this from          stockholders shall not exceed 20, or (2) a preemption of
the very beginning as it was presented a copy of the              shares is restricted in favor of any stockholder or of the
Transfer of Rights at the time the Agreement was signed;          corporation, or (3) listing its stocks in any stock exchange
that SJSSFI itself drafted the Agreement and insisted that        or making a public offering of such stocks is prohibited.
Mrs. Gruenberg accept the P100,000.00 as earnest money;           From its articles, it is clear that MSC is not a close
that granting, without admitting, the enforceability of the       corporation. MSC does not become one either, just
agreement, SJSSFI nonetheless failed to pay in legal tender       because Spouses Reynaldo and Nenita Gruenberg
within the stipulated period (up to 2 March 1989); that it        owned 99.866% of its subscribed capital stock. The
was the understanding between Mrs. Gruenberg and                  mere ownership by a single stockholder or by another
SJSSFI that the Transfer of Rights/Deed of Assignment             corporation of all or nearly all of the capital stock of
will be signed only upon receipt of cash payment; thus            a corporation is not of itself sufficient ground for
they agreed that if the payment be in check, they will meet       disregarding the separate corporate personalities. So,
at a bank designated by SJSSFI where they will encash the         too, a narrow distribution of ownership does not, by
check and sign the Transfer of Rights/Deed, but that              itself, make a close corporation.
SJSSFI informed Mrs. Gruenberg of the alleged availability
of the check, by phone, only after banking hours.
        On the basis of the evidence, and on 18 June                                               ruizsharmine

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Hawaii Foreclosure Law Summary
Hawaii Foreclosure Law SummaryHawaii Foreclosure Law Summary
Hawaii Foreclosure Law SummaryShortSaleUS .
 
Texas anti indemnity
Texas anti indemnity Texas anti indemnity
Texas anti indemnity julielennon
 
Lecture 2 formation of a contract
Lecture 2   formation of a contractLecture 2   formation of a contract
Lecture 2 formation of a contractRamona Vansluytman
 
Stock and Stockholders: Sample law cases
Stock and Stockholders: Sample law casesStock and Stockholders: Sample law cases
Stock and Stockholders: Sample law casesantonette talledo
 
The Law of Penalties - ANZ v Andrews and beyond
The Law of Penalties - ANZ v Andrews and beyond The Law of Penalties - ANZ v Andrews and beyond
The Law of Penalties - ANZ v Andrews and beyond Laina Chan
 
Clsp subject: chandra sanyal vs calcutta stock exchange association limited
Clsp subject: chandra sanyal vs calcutta stock exchange association limitedClsp subject: chandra sanyal vs calcutta stock exchange association limited
Clsp subject: chandra sanyal vs calcutta stock exchange association limitedswetapat
 
Marketing proposal superhouse-new[1]
Marketing proposal superhouse-new[1]Marketing proposal superhouse-new[1]
Marketing proposal superhouse-new[1]sirohiyuvraj
 
New Selangor Plantation v Talam Management
New Selangor Plantation v Talam ManagementNew Selangor Plantation v Talam Management
New Selangor Plantation v Talam ManagementNur Farhana Ana
 
Cr 1 - contingency removal #1 - 410
Cr 1 - contingency removal #1 - 410Cr 1 - contingency removal #1 - 410
Cr 1 - contingency removal #1 - 410cdukelow
 
Vermont Fraudulent Transfer Laws
Vermont Fraudulent Transfer LawsVermont Fraudulent Transfer Laws
Vermont Fraudulent Transfer LawsJordan K. Carpenter
 
Avid agent visual inspection disclosure - 411
Avid   agent visual inspection disclosure - 411Avid   agent visual inspection disclosure - 411
Avid agent visual inspection disclosure - 411cdukelow
 
340 Brightonlake Rd, Beautiful New Listing In Brighton Michigan
340 Brightonlake Rd, Beautiful New Listing In Brighton Michigan340 Brightonlake Rd, Beautiful New Listing In Brighton Michigan
340 Brightonlake Rd, Beautiful New Listing In Brighton Michigantommygill7
 

Mais procurados (19)

Hawaii Foreclosure Law Summary
Hawaii Foreclosure Law SummaryHawaii Foreclosure Law Summary
Hawaii Foreclosure Law Summary
 
Lecture 12 privity - notes
Lecture 12   privity - notesLecture 12   privity - notes
Lecture 12 privity - notes
 
Texas anti indemnity
Texas anti indemnity Texas anti indemnity
Texas anti indemnity
 
Lecture 2 formation of a contract
Lecture 2   formation of a contractLecture 2   formation of a contract
Lecture 2 formation of a contract
 
Evergreen Clause Fundamentals
Evergreen Clause FundamentalsEvergreen Clause Fundamentals
Evergreen Clause Fundamentals
 
Stock and Stockholders: Sample law cases
Stock and Stockholders: Sample law casesStock and Stockholders: Sample law cases
Stock and Stockholders: Sample law cases
 
Lecture 13 duress - notes
Lecture 13   duress - notesLecture 13   duress - notes
Lecture 13 duress - notes
 
The Law of Penalties - ANZ v Andrews and beyond
The Law of Penalties - ANZ v Andrews and beyond The Law of Penalties - ANZ v Andrews and beyond
The Law of Penalties - ANZ v Andrews and beyond
 
Clsp subject: chandra sanyal vs calcutta stock exchange association limited
Clsp subject: chandra sanyal vs calcutta stock exchange association limitedClsp subject: chandra sanyal vs calcutta stock exchange association limited
Clsp subject: chandra sanyal vs calcutta stock exchange association limited
 
Marketing proposal superhouse-new[1]
Marketing proposal superhouse-new[1]Marketing proposal superhouse-new[1]
Marketing proposal superhouse-new[1]
 
Breaches of contract
Breaches of contractBreaches of contract
Breaches of contract
 
New Selangor Plantation v Talam Management
New Selangor Plantation v Talam ManagementNew Selangor Plantation v Talam Management
New Selangor Plantation v Talam Management
 
Lecture 13 duress - cases
Lecture 13   duress - casesLecture 13   duress - cases
Lecture 13 duress - cases
 
Week 12 cases
Week 12 casesWeek 12 cases
Week 12 cases
 
Cr 1 - contingency removal #1 - 410
Cr 1 - contingency removal #1 - 410Cr 1 - contingency removal #1 - 410
Cr 1 - contingency removal #1 - 410
 
Vermont Fraudulent Transfer Laws
Vermont Fraudulent Transfer LawsVermont Fraudulent Transfer Laws
Vermont Fraudulent Transfer Laws
 
Avid agent visual inspection disclosure - 411
Avid   agent visual inspection disclosure - 411Avid   agent visual inspection disclosure - 411
Avid agent visual inspection disclosure - 411
 
340 Brightonlake Rd, Beautiful New Listing In Brighton Michigan
340 Brightonlake Rd, Beautiful New Listing In Brighton Michigan340 Brightonlake Rd, Beautiful New Listing In Brighton Michigan
340 Brightonlake Rd, Beautiful New Listing In Brighton Michigan
 
Classifieds
ClassifiedsClassifieds
Classifieds
 

Semelhante a Close Corporation Ownership Alone Insufficient

Essential characteristics of sales
Essential characteristics of salesEssential characteristics of sales
Essential characteristics of salesNichaelMadria
 
NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents: The Automatic Stay and Bank...
NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents:  The  Automatic  Stay and Bank...NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents:  The  Automatic  Stay and Bank...
NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents: The Automatic Stay and Bank...William J. Amann
 
Hostess arb cash collateral opinion
Hostess arb cash collateral opinionHostess arb cash collateral opinion
Hostess arb cash collateral opinionCourtReads
 
Prime white cement vs. iac
Prime white cement vs. iacPrime white cement vs. iac
Prime white cement vs. iacquinnee02
 
Assignment question in fulfillment of Business Law Paper for MBA Program- OPe...
Assignment question in fulfillment of Business Law Paper for MBA Program- OPe...Assignment question in fulfillment of Business Law Paper for MBA Program- OPe...
Assignment question in fulfillment of Business Law Paper for MBA Program- OPe...santhy govindasamy
 
104601855 insurance-cases-1
104601855 insurance-cases-1104601855 insurance-cases-1
104601855 insurance-cases-1homeworkping7
 
58944422 insurance-cases-set-1
58944422 insurance-cases-set-158944422 insurance-cases-set-1
58944422 insurance-cases-set-1homeworkping3
 
2. yap-v-commission-on-audit
2. yap-v-commission-on-audit2. yap-v-commission-on-audit
2. yap-v-commission-on-auditkarlcredo1
 
15.-PILIPINAS-BANK-VS-ONG - 3.docx
15.-PILIPINAS-BANK-VS-ONG - 3.docx15.-PILIPINAS-BANK-VS-ONG - 3.docx
15.-PILIPINAS-BANK-VS-ONG - 3.docxeunicedemaclid
 
Persons-Digested-Cases (2).docx
Persons-Digested-Cases (2).docxPersons-Digested-Cases (2).docx
Persons-Digested-Cases (2).docxNezelJadeGanzan
 
Specific performance
Specific performanceSpecific performance
Specific performanceUmmi Rahimi
 
Specific Relief Act Sections & Case Laws PPT.pptx
Specific Relief Act Sections & Case Laws PPT.pptxSpecific Relief Act Sections & Case Laws PPT.pptx
Specific Relief Act Sections & Case Laws PPT.pptxsrikarna235
 
Heath Global - 492_B.R._650
Heath Global - 492_B.R._650Heath Global - 492_B.R._650
Heath Global - 492_B.R._650James Glucksman
 

Semelhante a Close Corporation Ownership Alone Insufficient (20)

Charges part-2 (1)
Charges  part-2 (1)Charges  part-2 (1)
Charges part-2 (1)
 
Charges 2
Charges  2Charges  2
Charges 2
 
charges 2
charges 2charges 2
charges 2
 
Essential characteristics of sales
Essential characteristics of salesEssential characteristics of sales
Essential characteristics of sales
 
Prohibitory orders
Prohibitory ordersProhibitory orders
Prohibitory orders
 
NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents: The Automatic Stay and Bank...
NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents:  The  Automatic  Stay and Bank...NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents:  The  Automatic  Stay and Bank...
NBI, Inc. and William J. Amann, Esq. presents: The Automatic Stay and Bank...
 
NBI Auto Stay April 2016
NBI Auto Stay April 2016NBI Auto Stay April 2016
NBI Auto Stay April 2016
 
Hostess arb cash collateral opinion
Hostess arb cash collateral opinionHostess arb cash collateral opinion
Hostess arb cash collateral opinion
 
Prime white cement vs. iac
Prime white cement vs. iacPrime white cement vs. iac
Prime white cement vs. iac
 
Assignment question in fulfillment of Business Law Paper for MBA Program- OPe...
Assignment question in fulfillment of Business Law Paper for MBA Program- OPe...Assignment question in fulfillment of Business Law Paper for MBA Program- OPe...
Assignment question in fulfillment of Business Law Paper for MBA Program- OPe...
 
104601855 insurance-cases-1
104601855 insurance-cases-1104601855 insurance-cases-1
104601855 insurance-cases-1
 
58944422 insurance-cases-set-1
58944422 insurance-cases-set-158944422 insurance-cases-set-1
58944422 insurance-cases-set-1
 
2. yap-v-commission-on-audit
2. yap-v-commission-on-audit2. yap-v-commission-on-audit
2. yap-v-commission-on-audit
 
charges 4
charges 4 charges 4
charges 4
 
15.-PILIPINAS-BANK-VS-ONG - 3.docx
15.-PILIPINAS-BANK-VS-ONG - 3.docx15.-PILIPINAS-BANK-VS-ONG - 3.docx
15.-PILIPINAS-BANK-VS-ONG - 3.docx
 
Persons-Digested-Cases (2).docx
Persons-Digested-Cases (2).docxPersons-Digested-Cases (2).docx
Persons-Digested-Cases (2).docx
 
Specific performance
Specific performanceSpecific performance
Specific performance
 
private caveats
private caveatsprivate caveats
private caveats
 
Specific Relief Act Sections & Case Laws PPT.pptx
Specific Relief Act Sections & Case Laws PPT.pptxSpecific Relief Act Sections & Case Laws PPT.pptx
Specific Relief Act Sections & Case Laws PPT.pptx
 
Heath Global - 492_B.R._650
Heath Global - 492_B.R._650Heath Global - 492_B.R._650
Heath Global - 492_B.R._650
 

Close Corporation Ownership Alone Insufficient

  • 1. 1994, the Regional Trial Court of Makati, Metro Manila, CORPO: CLOSE CORPORATION Branch 63 (Civil Case 89-3511) rendered judgment, dismissing SJSSFI's complaint, finding that Nenita Lee San Juan Structural and Steel Fabricator[GR 129459, Gutenberg was not authorized by the corporation to 29 September 1998] dispose of the property as such disposition is governed by First Division, Panganiban (J): 4 concur the requirements of Section 40, Corporation Code; and that Nenita Lee Gutenberg did not in anyway misrepresent Facts: On 14 February 1989, San Juan Structural and Steel herself to be authorized by the corporation to sell the Fabricators, Inc. (SJSSFI) entered into an agreement with property to SJSSFI. The trial court also dismissed the Motorich Sales Corporation (MSC) for the transfer to it of counterclaim. SJSSFI appealed. On 18 March 1997, the a parcel of land identified as Lot 30, Block 1 of the Court of Appeals (CA GR CV 46801) modified the Acropolis Greens Subdivision located in the District of decision of the trial court by ordering Nenita Lee Murphy, Quezon City, Metro Manila, containing an area of Gutenberg to refund or return to SJSSFI the 414 square meters, covered by TCT (362909) 2876 (the lot downpayment of P100,000.00 which she received from the was still registered in the name of ACL Development latter. SJSSFI moved for reconsideration, which was denied Corporation [ADC] at that time). As stipulated in the by the appellate court on 10 June 1997. SJSSFI filed the Agreement of 14 February 1989, SJSSFI paid the Petition for Review on Certiorari. SJSSFI argues, among downpayment in the sum of P100,000.00, the balance to others, that the veil of corporate fiction of MSC be paid on or before 2 March 1989. On 1 March 1989, Mr. should be pierced, because the latter is a close Andres T. Co, SJSSFI president, wrote a letter to MSC corporation. Since "Spouses Reynaldo L. Gruenberg requesting for a computation of the balance to be paid. and Nenita R. Gruenberg owned all or almost all or Said letter was coursed through MSC's broker, Linda 99.866% to be accurate, of the subscribed capital Aduca, who wrote the computation of the balance. On 2 stock" 25 of Motorich, petitioner argues that Gruenberg March 1989, SJSSFI was ready with the amount needed no authorization from the board to enter into the corresponding to the balance, covered by Metrobank subject contract. It adds that, being solely owned by Cashier's Check 004223, payable to MSC. SJSSFI and MSC the Spouses Gruenberg the company can be treated were supposed to meet in the office of SJSSFI but MSC's as a close corporation which can be bound by the acts treasurer, Nenita Lee Gruenberg, did not appear. MSC, of its principal stockholder who needs no specific despite repeated demands and in utter disregard of its authority. commitments had refused to execute the Transfer of Rights/Deed of Assignment which is necessary to transfer Issue: Whether MSC is a close corporation, based on the the certificate of title. On 6 April 1989, ADC and MSC fact that almost all of the shares of stock of the entered into a Deed of Absolute Sale whereby the former corporation are owned by said treasurer and her husband. transferred to the latter the subject property. By reason of Held: Section 96 of the Corporation Code defines a close said transfer, the Registry of Deeds of Quezon City issued corporation provides that "A close corporation, within the a new title in the name of MSC, represented by Nenita Lee meaning of this Code, is one whose articles of Gruenberg and Reynaldo L Gruenberg, under Transfer incorporation provide that: (1) All of the corporation's Certificate of Title 3571. SJSSFI filed the complaint for issued stock of all classes, exclusive of treasury shares, damages against MSC, and Nenita Lee Gruenberg, as a shall be held of record by not more than a specified result of the latter’s alleged bad faith in refusing to execute number of persons, not exceeding twenty (20); (2) All of a formal Transfer of Rights/Deed of Assignment. It the issued stock of all classes shall be subject to one or impleaded ADC and JNM Realty & Development Corp. more specified restrictions on transfer permitted by this (JRDC) as necessary parties, since Transfer Certificate of Title; and (3) The corporation shall not list in any stock Title (362909) 2876 was in the name of ADC, and that exchange or make any public offering of any of its stock JRDC is the transferor of right in favor of MDC. of any class. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a corporation In its answer, MSC and Nenita Lee Gruenberg shall be deemed not a close corporation when at least two- interposed as affirmative defense that the President and thirds (2/3) of its voting stock or voting rights is owned or Chairman of Motorich did not sign the agreement controlled by another corporation which is not a close adverted to; that Mrs. Gruenberg's signature on the corporation within the meaning of this Code." agreement is inadequate to bind MSC as the other The articles of incorporation of MSC does not signature, that of Mr. Reynaldo Gruenberg, President and contain any provision stating that (1) the number of Chairman of MSC, is required; that SJSSFI knew this from stockholders shall not exceed 20, or (2) a preemption of the very beginning as it was presented a copy of the shares is restricted in favor of any stockholder or of the Transfer of Rights at the time the Agreement was signed; corporation, or (3) listing its stocks in any stock exchange that SJSSFI itself drafted the Agreement and insisted that or making a public offering of such stocks is prohibited. Mrs. Gruenberg accept the P100,000.00 as earnest money; From its articles, it is clear that MSC is not a close that granting, without admitting, the enforceability of the corporation. MSC does not become one either, just agreement, SJSSFI nonetheless failed to pay in legal tender because Spouses Reynaldo and Nenita Gruenberg within the stipulated period (up to 2 March 1989); that it owned 99.866% of its subscribed capital stock. The was the understanding between Mrs. Gruenberg and mere ownership by a single stockholder or by another SJSSFI that the Transfer of Rights/Deed of Assignment corporation of all or nearly all of the capital stock of will be signed only upon receipt of cash payment; thus a corporation is not of itself sufficient ground for they agreed that if the payment be in check, they will meet disregarding the separate corporate personalities. So, at a bank designated by SJSSFI where they will encash the too, a narrow distribution of ownership does not, by check and sign the Transfer of Rights/Deed, but that itself, make a close corporation. SJSSFI informed Mrs. Gruenberg of the alleged availability of the check, by phone, only after banking hours. On the basis of the evidence, and on 18 June ruizsharmine