3. Reasons for Reform in 1994
• Two contra productive business models
• Hospital tries to keep within the budget
• Physician on fee for service
• Involvement of Government too restrictive
• Growing costs, but no metrics of the outcome
• 1994 Biesheuvel Report Modernising Curative
Care
• The start of Paradigm Shift from supply to
demand orientation
4. Performance based hospital funding
• Demand orientation Health issue patient
• Combine diagnostics and treatment
• Payment of Hospital / Medical specialist
• Requires data collection by patient by health
issue
• New dimension in health information systems
• System designed by major stakeholders
• After preparation introduction for funding 2005
5. Health Insurance Act 2006
• Mandatory Insurance scheme for all
• After 30 years of political discussion !
• Competing private insurance companies
• Insurance company contracts health
providers of choice
• Central role for Insurance companies
• Focus on Quality Improvement
• Sustainable health care system
7. The Dutch DBC Funding
results
More market and transparency
Patients can choose
Process of CHANGE !
DBC-systems works
7
8. 10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
% 90
0
Di
ab
ete
Di s
ab
+B
M
Ha I
r ti
Be nf
ro ar
er ct
te
(C
VA
)
Ha
r tf
Co ale
lo n
nk
an
ke
Lo
ng r
ka
nk
Bo er
rst
ka
nk
er
As
tm
a
CO
Os PD
te op
or
os
e
growth of chronic diseases since 2005
The 2030 Long Term Care Crisis
Mannen
Vrouwen
12. Care Standard is Special
• Developed by Care Providers and Patients
• Based on Guidelines / Protocols / Lifestyle
• Defines what Good Chronic Care is for patiënt
• Not who should perform
• Combines Prevention and Care
• Defines Quality Performance Indicators
• Base for Task substitution
• Involvement Patient
13. 2005 National Diabetes taskforce
• Diabetes Care is growing
• The system will not be able to cope
• The NDF Diabetes Care Standard
• Agreed by professionals and patient organisation
• Only applied to 40 % of the patients
ACTION is needed
13
14. 2006 Diabetes funding Experiment
• Performance based funding for Diabetes
• Based on the Care Product Approach
• Contracting by Insurance Companies
• With Multidisciplinary Care Team
• Represented by a Care Group, a legal entity
• Reporting of Process and Outcome
• Care based on the NDF Care standard
• First step to Integrated Care Delivery
• Experiment with 10 groups
15. The Dutch Chronic Care Funding Model
Process
Carestandard for Outcome
Good Diabetes Care Patient CQ
Caregroup Insurer
Contract
Patient
Care
Providers
15
16. Result Experiment
• Care group responsible for outcome
• Focus on education and continuous learning
• Documentation of care process and outcome
• IT support still in its infancy, but good examples
• Quality improvement process stimulated
• The contracting process is new for all
17. First indications of result
In Green en White areas with
lower then expected foot
amputations a disease mgt
approach was applied.
The black and red areas have
Higher then expected
amputations
18. Next Step
Integrated Care Funding
introduction for chronic diseases
Preparation started in 2009
18
19. Integrated Care Funding 2010
• Integrated Funding for chronic conditions
1. Diabetes
2. Cardio Vascular Risk Management
3. COPD
• Based on Authorized Care Standards
• Contract on Price / Performance Indicators
• Free pricing
• Transparency by Reporting Chronic Dataset
• Focus on Prevention
• Patient part of the team – Lifestyle changes
19
20. Integrated Care in and exclusions
Incidental Medical
Specialist Care
Indication
In
clusion Integrated Care Product Ex
clusion
Indication
Physiotherapy
program
21. Integrated care & care standard
GP Pharmasists
Dietist
Physiotherapies
Podotherapist
Medical
Care Standard Specialists
Home Care
Laboratory
Imaging Dept PATIENT
21
22. A meta standard for care standards
• Care standard development was hot
• National Platform for care standards
• Develop a model for care standards
• Define what care should be provided
• Care standard base for individualised care
• Define Obligate Parameters
• Process and outcome measures
• Implementation aspects
22
25. IT requirements
• Multidisciplinary team of primary (GP’s, Nurses
, paramedical specialist) and secundary care (
medical specialist)
• Patiënt is part of the care team
• Individual Proactive Treatment plan
• Semantic Interoperable Data
• Cross institutional solution
• Annual Reporting Dataset by patient
26. Documentation Parameters (DCM)
Each submodule has a number of Obligate Parameters
Document these in a Detailed Clinical Model DCM
The DCM is the base for registration , Exchange of Data and
Reporting
DCM are part of the care standard
DCM will be maintained nationally
DCM have two dimensions
Modeling clinical content to clinical datamodel
Translating Clinical datamodel to implementation standards
27. Care Standard Model +
I
N Indexed Care related
Prevention Prevention & treatment
T
E
G
R
A
T Implementation Dimensions
E Specification Reporting eHealth
D Parameters DCM Datasets Requirements
28. Result
• Care standard
Care Process
Interventions
Quality Indicators
• Annex to the Care Standard
• Funding arrangement
• Contracting
• Documentation
• Specification Clinical Parameters
• Reporting dataset
• ICT requirement
30. New health delivery model –
phase 1
Integrated DBC funding
Diabetes
CardioVascularRisc Management
31. Chronically Ill
Diagnosis
At Risk
Take Home Message Healthy
• Active involvement of Patient, individual
treatment plan based on
• Care standards ( Clinicians Consumer Patients)
with integrated eHealth standards
• Interlinking of prevention and care
• New business model focused on quality
• Reorientation Health Delivery System
substitution
• Challenges providers and insurers
• European Approach seems needed !
34