SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 15
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
Mobile Communications
Chapter 10: Mobile Transport Layer
 Motivation
 TCP-mechanisms
 Indirect TCP
 Snooping TCP
 Mobile TCP
10.0.1
 Fast retransmit/recovery
 Transmission freezing
 Selective retransmission
 Transaction oriented TCP
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
Motivation I
Transport protocols typically designed for
 Fixed end-systems
 Fixed, wired networks
Research activities
 Performance
 Congestion control
 Efficient retransmissions
TCP congestion control
 packet loss in fixed networks typically due to (temporary) overload
situations
 router have to discard packets as soon as the buffers are full
 TCP recognizes congestion only indirect via missing
acknowledgements, retransmissions unwise, they would only
contribute to the congestion and make it even worse
 slow-start algorithm as reaction
10.1.1
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
Motivation II
TCP slow-start algorithm
 sender calculates a congestion window for a receiver
 start with a congestion window size equal to one segment
 exponential increase of the congestion window up to the congestion
threshold, then linear increase
 missing acknowledgement causes the reduction of the congestion
threshold to one half of the current congestion window
 congestion window starts again with one segment
TCP fast retransmit/fast recovery
 TCP sends an acknowledgement only after receiving a packet
 if a sender receives several acknowledgements for the same
packet, this is due to a gap in received packets at the receiver
 however, the receiver got all packets up to the gap and is actually
receiving packets
 therefore, packet loss is not due to congestion, continue with
current congestion window (do not use slow-start)
10.2.1
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
Influences of mobility on TCP-mechanisms
TCP assumes congestion if packets are dropped
 typically wrong in wireless networks, here we often have packet loss
due to transmission errors
 furthermore, mobility itself can cause packet loss, if e.g. a mobile
node roams from one access point (e.g. foreign agent in Mobile IP)
to another while there are still packets in transit to the wrong access
point and forwarding is not possible
The performance of an unchanged TCP degrades severely
 however, TCP cannot be changed fundamentally due to the large
base of installation in the fixed network, TCP for mobility has to
remain compatible
 the basic TCP mechanisms keep the whole Internet together
10.3.1
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
Indirect TCP I
Indirect TCP or I-TCP segments the connection
 no changes to the TCP protocol for hosts connected to the wired
Internet, millions of computers use (variants of) this protocol
 optimized TCP protocol for mobile hosts
 splitting of the TCP connection at, e.g., the foreign agent into 2 TCP
connections, no real end-to-end connection any longer
 hosts in the fixed part of the net do not notice the characteristics of
the wireless part
mobile host
access point
(foreign agent) „wired“ Internet
„wireless“ TCP standard TCP
10.4.1
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
I-TCP socket and state migration
mobile host
access point2
Internet
access point1
socket migration
and state transfer
10.5.1
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
Indirect TCP II
Advantages
 no changes in the fixed network necessary, no changes for the hosts
(TCP protocol) necessary, all current optimizations to TCP still work
 transmission errors on the wireless link do not propagate into the fixed
network
 simple to control, mobile TCP is used only for one hop between, e.g., a
foreign agent and mobile host
 therefore, a very fast retransmission of packets is possible, the short
delay on the mobile hop is known
Disadvantages
 loss of end-to-end semantics, an acknowledgement to a sender does
now not any longer mean that a receiver really got a packet, foreign
agents might crash
 higher latency possible due to buffering of data within the foreign agent
and forwarding to a new foreign agent
10.6.1
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
Snooping TCP I
„Transparent“ extension of TCP within the foreign agent
 buffering of packets sent to the mobile host
 lost packets on the wireless link (both directions!) will be
retransmitted immediately by the mobile host or foreign agent,
respectively (so called “local” retransmission)
 the foreign agent therefore “snoops” the packet flow and recognizes
acknowledgements in both directions, it also filters ACKs
 changes of TCP only within the foreign agent
„wired“ Internet
buffering of data
end-to-end TCP connection
local retransmission
10.7.1
correspondent
hostforeign
agent
mobile
host
snooping of ACKs
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
Snooping TCP II
Data transfer to the mobile host
 FA buffers data until it receives ACK of the MH, FA detects packet
loss via duplicated ACKs or time-out
 fast retransmission possible, transparent for the fixed network
Data transfer from the mobile host
 FA detects packet loss on the wireless link via sequence numbers,
FA answers directly with a NACK to the MH
 MH can now retransmit data with only a very short delay
Integration of the MAC layer
 MAC layer often has similar mechanisms to those of TCP
 thus, the MAC layer can already detect duplicated packets due to
retransmissions and discard them
Problems
 snooping TCP does not isolate the wireless link as good as I-TCP
 snooping might be useless depending on encryption schemes
10.8.1
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
Mobile TCP
Special handling of lengthy and/or frequent disconnections
M-TCP splits as I-TCP does
 unmodified TCP fixed network to supervisory host (SH)
 optimized TCP SH to MH
Supervisory host
 no caching, no retransmission
 monitors all packets, if disconnection detected
 set sender window size to 0
 sender automatically goes into persistent mode
 old or new SH reopen the window
Advantages
 maintains semantics, supports disconnection, no buffer forwarding
Disadvantages
 loss on wireless link propagated into fixed network
 adapted TCP on wireless link
10.9.1
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
Fast retransmit/fast recovery
Change of foreign agent often results in packet loss
 TCP reacts with slow-start although there is no congestion
Forced fast retransmit
 as soon as the mobile host has registered with a new foreign agent,
the MH sends duplicated acknowledgements on purpose
 this forces the fast retransmit mode at the communication partners
 additionally, the TCP on the MH is forced to continue sending with
the actual window size and not to go into slow-start after registration
Advantage
 simple changes result in significant higher performance
Disadvantage
 further mix of IP and TCP, no transparent approach
10.10.1
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
Transmission/time-out freezing
Mobile hosts can be disconnected for a longer time
 no packet exchange possible, e.g., in a tunnel, disconnection due to
overloaded cells or mux. with higher priority traffic
 TCP disconnects after time-out completely
TCP freezing
 MAC layer is often able to detect interruption in advance
 MAC can inform TCP layer of upcoming loss of connection
 TCP stops sending, but does now not assume a congested link
 MAC layer signals again if reconnected
Advantage
 scheme is independent of data
Disadvantage
 TCP on mobile host has to be changed, mechanism depends on
MAC layer
10.11.1
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
Selective retransmission
TCP acknowledgements are often cumulative
 ACK n acknowledges correct and in-sequence receipt of packets up
to n
 if single packets are missing quite often a whole packet sequence
beginning at the gap has to be retransmitted (go-back-n), thus
wasting bandwidth
Selective retransmission as one solution
 RFC2018 allows for acknowledgements of single packets, not only
acknowledgements of in-sequence packet streams without gaps
 sender can now retransmit only the missing packets
Advantage
 much higher efficiency
Disadvantage
 more complex software in a receiver, more buffer needed at the
receiver
10.12.1
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
Transaction oriented TCP
TCP phases
 connection setup, data transmission, connection release
 using 3-way-handshake needs 3 packets for setup and release,
respectively
 thus, even short messages need a minimum of 7 packets!
Transaction oriented TCP
 RFC1644, T-TCP, describes a TCP version to avoid this overhead
 connection setup, data transfer and connection release can be
combined
 thus, only 2 or 3 packets are needed
Advantage
 efficiency
Disadvantage
 requires changed TCP
 mobility not longer transparent
10.13.1
Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport
Comparison of different approaches for a “mobile” TCP
Approach Mechanism Advantages Disadvantages
Indirect TCP splits TCP connection
into two connections
isolation of wireless
link, simple
loss of TCP semantics,
higher latency at
handover
Snooping TCP “snoops” data and
acknowledgements, local
retransmission
transparent for end-to-
end connection, MAC
integration possible
problematic with
encryption, bad isolation
of wireless link
M-TCP splits TCP connection,
chokes sender via
window size
Maintains end-to-end
semantics, handles
long term and frequent
disconnections
Bad isolation of wireless
link, processing
overhead due to
bandwidth management
Fast retransmit/
fast recovery
avoids slow-start after
roaming
simple and efficient mixed layers, not
transparent
Transmission/
time-out freezing
freezes TCP state at
disconnect, resumes
after reconnection
independent of content
or encryption, works for
longer interrupts
changes in TCP
required, MAC
dependant
Selective
retransmission
retransmit only lost data very efficient slightly more complex
receiver software, more
buffer needed
Transaction
oriented TCP
combine connection
setup/release and data
transmission
Efficient for certain
applications
changes in TCP
required, not transparent
10.14.1

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Mobile computing : Indirect TCP
Mobile computing : Indirect TCPMobile computing : Indirect TCP
Mobile computing : Indirect TCPSushant Kushwaha
 
Tcp snoop protocols
Tcp snoop protocols  Tcp snoop protocols
Tcp snoop protocols Amr Nasr
 
Mobile transport layer .
Mobile transport layer .Mobile transport layer .
Mobile transport layer .junnubabu
 
Transport Layer in Computer Networks (TCP / UDP / SCTP)
Transport Layer in Computer Networks (TCP / UDP / SCTP)Transport Layer in Computer Networks (TCP / UDP / SCTP)
Transport Layer in Computer Networks (TCP / UDP / SCTP)Hamidreza Bolhasani
 
transport layer protocols
transport layer protocolstransport layer protocols
transport layer protocolsBE Smârt
 
the transport layer
the transport layerthe transport layer
the transport layertumetr1
 
Mobile Network Layer
Mobile Network LayerMobile Network Layer
Mobile Network LayerRahul Hada
 
Transport protocols
Transport protocolsTransport protocols
Transport protocolsOnline
 
Jaimin chp-6 - transport layer- 2011 batch
Jaimin   chp-6 - transport layer- 2011 batchJaimin   chp-6 - transport layer- 2011 batch
Jaimin chp-6 - transport layer- 2011 batchJaimin Jani
 
Transport layer (computer networks)
Transport layer (computer networks)Transport layer (computer networks)
Transport layer (computer networks)Fatbardh Hysa
 
A Survey of Different Approaches for Differentiating Bit Error and Congestion...
A Survey of Different Approaches for Differentiating Bit Error and Congestion...A Survey of Different Approaches for Differentiating Bit Error and Congestion...
A Survey of Different Approaches for Differentiating Bit Error and Congestion...IJERD Editor
 
Tcp Udp Icmp And The Transport Layer
Tcp Udp Icmp And The Transport LayerTcp Udp Icmp And The Transport Layer
Tcp Udp Icmp And The Transport Layertmavroidis
 

Mais procurados (20)

transport protocols
transport protocolstransport protocols
transport protocols
 
Transaction TCP
Transaction TCPTransaction TCP
Transaction TCP
 
Unit 4
Unit 4Unit 4
Unit 4
 
Mobile computing : Indirect TCP
Mobile computing : Indirect TCPMobile computing : Indirect TCP
Mobile computing : Indirect TCP
 
Tcp snoop protocols
Tcp snoop protocols  Tcp snoop protocols
Tcp snoop protocols
 
Cs8601 4
Cs8601 4Cs8601 4
Cs8601 4
 
Mobile transport layer .
Mobile transport layer .Mobile transport layer .
Mobile transport layer .
 
Transport Layer in Computer Networks (TCP / UDP / SCTP)
Transport Layer in Computer Networks (TCP / UDP / SCTP)Transport Layer in Computer Networks (TCP / UDP / SCTP)
Transport Layer in Computer Networks (TCP / UDP / SCTP)
 
Transport layer protocol
Transport layer protocolTransport layer protocol
Transport layer protocol
 
transport layer protocols
transport layer protocolstransport layer protocols
transport layer protocols
 
Transport Protocols
Transport ProtocolsTransport Protocols
Transport Protocols
 
the transport layer
the transport layerthe transport layer
the transport layer
 
Mobile Network Layer
Mobile Network LayerMobile Network Layer
Mobile Network Layer
 
Transport protocols
Transport protocolsTransport protocols
Transport protocols
 
Transport layer
Transport layerTransport layer
Transport layer
 
Jaimin chp-6 - transport layer- 2011 batch
Jaimin   chp-6 - transport layer- 2011 batchJaimin   chp-6 - transport layer- 2011 batch
Jaimin chp-6 - transport layer- 2011 batch
 
Transport layer (computer networks)
Transport layer (computer networks)Transport layer (computer networks)
Transport layer (computer networks)
 
Transport layer
Transport layerTransport layer
Transport layer
 
A Survey of Different Approaches for Differentiating Bit Error and Congestion...
A Survey of Different Approaches for Differentiating Bit Error and Congestion...A Survey of Different Approaches for Differentiating Bit Error and Congestion...
A Survey of Different Approaches for Differentiating Bit Error and Congestion...
 
Tcp Udp Icmp And The Transport Layer
Tcp Udp Icmp And The Transport LayerTcp Udp Icmp And The Transport Layer
Tcp Udp Icmp And The Transport Layer
 

Destaque

Владимир Кириллов-TCP-Performance for-Mobile-Applications
Владимир Кириллов-TCP-Performance for-Mobile-ApplicationsВладимир Кириллов-TCP-Performance for-Mobile-Applications
Владимир Кириллов-TCP-Performance for-Mobile-ApplicationsUA Mobile
 
C10 support for-mobility
C10 support for-mobilityC10 support for-mobility
C10 support for-mobilityRio Nguyen
 
Domain Name System (DNS)
Domain Name System (DNS)Domain Name System (DNS)
Domain Name System (DNS)Thiago Sinésio
 
Mobile Database
Mobile DatabaseMobile Database
Mobile DatabaseThanh Le
 
Mobile database security threats
Mobile database security threatsMobile database security threats
Mobile database security threatsAkhil Kumar
 
Mobile computing-tcp data flow control
Mobile computing-tcp data flow controlMobile computing-tcp data flow control
Mobile computing-tcp data flow controlSushant Kushwaha
 
Lecture 7 8 ad hoc wireless media access protocols
Lecture 7 8 ad hoc wireless media access protocolsLecture 7 8 ad hoc wireless media access protocols
Lecture 7 8 ad hoc wireless media access protocolsChandra Meena
 
Mobile Database ,alrazgi
Mobile Database ,alrazgiMobile Database ,alrazgi
Mobile Database ,alrazgialrazgi
 
WWW or World Wide Web
WWW or World Wide WebWWW or World Wide Web
WWW or World Wide WebSaransh Arora
 
Mobile dbms
Mobile dbmsMobile dbms
Mobile dbmsTech_MX
 
File Transfer Protocol
File Transfer ProtocolFile Transfer Protocol
File Transfer Protocolguest029bcd
 
DNS - Domain Name System
DNS - Domain Name SystemDNS - Domain Name System
DNS - Domain Name SystemPeter R. Egli
 
HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP)
HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP)HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP)
HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP)Gurjot Singh
 

Destaque (20)

Владимир Кириллов-TCP-Performance for-Mobile-Applications
Владимир Кириллов-TCP-Performance for-Mobile-ApplicationsВладимир Кириллов-TCP-Performance for-Mobile-Applications
Владимир Кириллов-TCP-Performance for-Mobile-Applications
 
WWW In Language Learning
WWW In Language Learning WWW In Language Learning
WWW In Language Learning
 
C10 support for-mobility
C10 support for-mobilityC10 support for-mobility
C10 support for-mobility
 
Domain Name System (DNS)
Domain Name System (DNS)Domain Name System (DNS)
Domain Name System (DNS)
 
Mobile Database
Mobile DatabaseMobile Database
Mobile Database
 
Mobile database security threats
Mobile database security threatsMobile database security threats
Mobile database security threats
 
Mobile computing-tcp data flow control
Mobile computing-tcp data flow controlMobile computing-tcp data flow control
Mobile computing-tcp data flow control
 
Lecture 7 8 ad hoc wireless media access protocols
Lecture 7 8 ad hoc wireless media access protocolsLecture 7 8 ad hoc wireless media access protocols
Lecture 7 8 ad hoc wireless media access protocols
 
Mobile Database ,alrazgi
Mobile Database ,alrazgiMobile Database ,alrazgi
Mobile Database ,alrazgi
 
Snooping TCP
Snooping TCPSnooping TCP
Snooping TCP
 
WWW or World Wide Web
WWW or World Wide WebWWW or World Wide Web
WWW or World Wide Web
 
It6601 mobile computing unit 5
It6601 mobile computing unit 5It6601 mobile computing unit 5
It6601 mobile computing unit 5
 
IT6601 MOBILE COMPUTING
IT6601 MOBILE COMPUTINGIT6601 MOBILE COMPUTING
IT6601 MOBILE COMPUTING
 
Smtp
SmtpSmtp
Smtp
 
Introduction to DNS
Introduction to DNSIntroduction to DNS
Introduction to DNS
 
Mobile dbms
Mobile dbmsMobile dbms
Mobile dbms
 
IPv6
IPv6IPv6
IPv6
 
File Transfer Protocol
File Transfer ProtocolFile Transfer Protocol
File Transfer Protocol
 
DNS - Domain Name System
DNS - Domain Name SystemDNS - Domain Name System
DNS - Domain Name System
 
HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP)
HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP)HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP)
HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP)
 

Semelhante a C10 transport protocols

Ch7-Transport_Protocols.ppt
Ch7-Transport_Protocols.pptCh7-Transport_Protocols.ppt
Ch7-Transport_Protocols.pptRituParna42
 
mobile_transport_layer (1).pptx
mobile_transport_layer (1).pptxmobile_transport_layer (1).pptx
mobile_transport_layer (1).pptxsinghram281982
 
EC 6802 WIRELESS NETWORK_ BABU M_ unit 3 ,4 & 5 PPT
EC 6802 WIRELESS NETWORK_ BABU M_ unit 3 ,4 & 5 PPTEC 6802 WIRELESS NETWORK_ BABU M_ unit 3 ,4 & 5 PPT
EC 6802 WIRELESS NETWORK_ BABU M_ unit 3 ,4 & 5 PPTbabuece
 
transport protocols
 transport protocols  transport protocols
transport protocols aibad ahmed
 
AN EXPLICIT LOSS AND HANDOFF NOTIFICATION SCHEME IN TCP FOR CELLULAR MOBILE S...
AN EXPLICIT LOSS AND HANDOFF NOTIFICATION SCHEME IN TCP FOR CELLULAR MOBILE S...AN EXPLICIT LOSS AND HANDOFF NOTIFICATION SCHEME IN TCP FOR CELLULAR MOBILE S...
AN EXPLICIT LOSS AND HANDOFF NOTIFICATION SCHEME IN TCP FOR CELLULAR MOBILE S...IJCNCJournal
 
Transport protocols
Transport protocolsTransport protocols
Transport protocolstrupti patil
 
Proposition of an Adaptive Retransmission Timeout for TCP in 802.11 Wireless ...
Proposition of an Adaptive Retransmission Timeout for TCP in 802.11 Wireless ...Proposition of an Adaptive Retransmission Timeout for TCP in 802.11 Wireless ...
Proposition of an Adaptive Retransmission Timeout for TCP in 802.11 Wireless ...IJERA Editor
 
A THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS OF TCP IN ADHOC NETWORKS
A THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS OF TCP IN ADHOC NETWORKSA THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS OF TCP IN ADHOC NETWORKS
A THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS OF TCP IN ADHOC NETWORKScsandit
 
A throughput analysis of tcp in adhoc networks
A throughput analysis of tcp in adhoc networksA throughput analysis of tcp in adhoc networks
A throughput analysis of tcp in adhoc networkscsandit
 
Improving Performance of TCP in Wireless Environment using TCP-P
Improving Performance of TCP in Wireless Environment using TCP-PImproving Performance of TCP in Wireless Environment using TCP-P
Improving Performance of TCP in Wireless Environment using TCP-PIDES Editor
 
Performance Evaluation of TCP with Adaptive Pacing and LRED in Multihop Wirel...
Performance Evaluation of TCP with Adaptive Pacing and LRED in Multihop Wirel...Performance Evaluation of TCP with Adaptive Pacing and LRED in Multihop Wirel...
Performance Evaluation of TCP with Adaptive Pacing and LRED in Multihop Wirel...ijwmn
 
transport layer pptxdkididkdkdkddjjdjffkfif
transport layer pptxdkididkdkdkddjjdjffkfiftransport layer pptxdkididkdkdkddjjdjffkfif
transport layer pptxdkididkdkdkddjjdjffkfifMujtabaFarooq5
 
Unit 4 MC QA.pdf
Unit 4 MC  QA.pdfUnit 4 MC  QA.pdf
Unit 4 MC QA.pdfCSEHOD11
 

Semelhante a C10 transport protocols (20)

Ch7-Transport_Protocols.ppt
Ch7-Transport_Protocols.pptCh7-Transport_Protocols.ppt
Ch7-Transport_Protocols.ppt
 
mobile_transport_layer (1).pptx
mobile_transport_layer (1).pptxmobile_transport_layer (1).pptx
mobile_transport_layer (1).pptx
 
EC 6802 WIRELESS NETWORK_ BABU M_ unit 3 ,4 & 5 PPT
EC 6802 WIRELESS NETWORK_ BABU M_ unit 3 ,4 & 5 PPTEC 6802 WIRELESS NETWORK_ BABU M_ unit 3 ,4 & 5 PPT
EC 6802 WIRELESS NETWORK_ BABU M_ unit 3 ,4 & 5 PPT
 
Unit 4
Unit 4Unit 4
Unit 4
 
Mc unit 4-jwfiles
Mc unit 4-jwfilesMc unit 4-jwfiles
Mc unit 4-jwfiles
 
Mcseminar
McseminarMcseminar
Mcseminar
 
transport protocols
 transport protocols  transport protocols
transport protocols
 
AN EXPLICIT LOSS AND HANDOFF NOTIFICATION SCHEME IN TCP FOR CELLULAR MOBILE S...
AN EXPLICIT LOSS AND HANDOFF NOTIFICATION SCHEME IN TCP FOR CELLULAR MOBILE S...AN EXPLICIT LOSS AND HANDOFF NOTIFICATION SCHEME IN TCP FOR CELLULAR MOBILE S...
AN EXPLICIT LOSS AND HANDOFF NOTIFICATION SCHEME IN TCP FOR CELLULAR MOBILE S...
 
Transport protocols
Transport protocolsTransport protocols
Transport protocols
 
It6601 mobile computing unit2
It6601 mobile computing unit2It6601 mobile computing unit2
It6601 mobile computing unit2
 
Tcp
TcpTcp
Tcp
 
Proposition of an Adaptive Retransmission Timeout for TCP in 802.11 Wireless ...
Proposition of an Adaptive Retransmission Timeout for TCP in 802.11 Wireless ...Proposition of an Adaptive Retransmission Timeout for TCP in 802.11 Wireless ...
Proposition of an Adaptive Retransmission Timeout for TCP in 802.11 Wireless ...
 
A THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS OF TCP IN ADHOC NETWORKS
A THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS OF TCP IN ADHOC NETWORKSA THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS OF TCP IN ADHOC NETWORKS
A THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS OF TCP IN ADHOC NETWORKS
 
A throughput analysis of tcp in adhoc networks
A throughput analysis of tcp in adhoc networksA throughput analysis of tcp in adhoc networks
A throughput analysis of tcp in adhoc networks
 
Transport layer
Transport layerTransport layer
Transport layer
 
Improving Performance of TCP in Wireless Environment using TCP-P
Improving Performance of TCP in Wireless Environment using TCP-PImproving Performance of TCP in Wireless Environment using TCP-P
Improving Performance of TCP in Wireless Environment using TCP-P
 
Performance Evaluation of TCP with Adaptive Pacing and LRED in Multihop Wirel...
Performance Evaluation of TCP with Adaptive Pacing and LRED in Multihop Wirel...Performance Evaluation of TCP with Adaptive Pacing and LRED in Multihop Wirel...
Performance Evaluation of TCP with Adaptive Pacing and LRED in Multihop Wirel...
 
transport layer pptxdkididkdkdkddjjdjffkfif
transport layer pptxdkididkdkdkddjjdjffkfiftransport layer pptxdkididkdkdkddjjdjffkfif
transport layer pptxdkididkdkdkddjjdjffkfif
 
TCP Congestion Control
TCP Congestion ControlTCP Congestion Control
TCP Congestion Control
 
Unit 4 MC QA.pdf
Unit 4 MC  QA.pdfUnit 4 MC  QA.pdf
Unit 4 MC QA.pdf
 

Mais de Rio Nguyen

C08 wireless atm[1]
C08 wireless atm[1]C08 wireless atm[1]
C08 wireless atm[1]Rio Nguyen
 
C08 network protocols
C08 network protocolsC08 network protocols
C08 network protocolsRio Nguyen
 
C07 wireless la-ns
C07 wireless la-nsC07 wireless la-ns
C07 wireless la-nsRio Nguyen
 
C11 support for-mobility
C11 support for-mobilityC11 support for-mobility
C11 support for-mobilityRio Nguyen
 
C05 satellite systems
C05 satellite systemsC05 satellite systems
C05 satellite systemsRio Nguyen
 
C04 wireless telecommunication-systems[1]
C04 wireless telecommunication-systems[1]C04 wireless telecommunication-systems[1]
C04 wireless telecommunication-systems[1]Rio Nguyen
 

Mais de Rio Nguyen (6)

C08 wireless atm[1]
C08 wireless atm[1]C08 wireless atm[1]
C08 wireless atm[1]
 
C08 network protocols
C08 network protocolsC08 network protocols
C08 network protocols
 
C07 wireless la-ns
C07 wireless la-nsC07 wireless la-ns
C07 wireless la-ns
 
C11 support for-mobility
C11 support for-mobilityC11 support for-mobility
C11 support for-mobility
 
C05 satellite systems
C05 satellite systemsC05 satellite systems
C05 satellite systems
 
C04 wireless telecommunication-systems[1]
C04 wireless telecommunication-systems[1]C04 wireless telecommunication-systems[1]
C04 wireless telecommunication-systems[1]
 

Último

Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxCorporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxRustici Software
 
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 AmsterdamDEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 AmsterdamUiPathCommunity
 
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdfSandro Moreira
 
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdfRansomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdfOverkill Security
 
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdfRising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdfOrbitshub
 
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Victor Rentea
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processorsdebabhi2
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAndrey Devyatkin
 
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDropbox
 
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024MIND CTI
 
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingRepurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingEdi Saputra
 
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024Victor Rentea
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoffsammart93
 
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWEREMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWERMadyBayot
 
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In PakistanCNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistandanishmna97
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMESafe Software
 
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with MilvusExploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with MilvusZilliz
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...apidays
 
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...Zilliz
 

Último (20)

Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxCorporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
 
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 AmsterdamDEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
 
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
 
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdfRansomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
 
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdfRising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
 
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
 
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
 
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
 
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
 
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingRepurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
 
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
 
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWEREMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
 
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In PakistanCNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with MilvusExploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
 
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
 

C10 transport protocols

  • 1. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport Mobile Communications Chapter 10: Mobile Transport Layer  Motivation  TCP-mechanisms  Indirect TCP  Snooping TCP  Mobile TCP 10.0.1  Fast retransmit/recovery  Transmission freezing  Selective retransmission  Transaction oriented TCP
  • 2. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport Motivation I Transport protocols typically designed for  Fixed end-systems  Fixed, wired networks Research activities  Performance  Congestion control  Efficient retransmissions TCP congestion control  packet loss in fixed networks typically due to (temporary) overload situations  router have to discard packets as soon as the buffers are full  TCP recognizes congestion only indirect via missing acknowledgements, retransmissions unwise, they would only contribute to the congestion and make it even worse  slow-start algorithm as reaction 10.1.1
  • 3. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport Motivation II TCP slow-start algorithm  sender calculates a congestion window for a receiver  start with a congestion window size equal to one segment  exponential increase of the congestion window up to the congestion threshold, then linear increase  missing acknowledgement causes the reduction of the congestion threshold to one half of the current congestion window  congestion window starts again with one segment TCP fast retransmit/fast recovery  TCP sends an acknowledgement only after receiving a packet  if a sender receives several acknowledgements for the same packet, this is due to a gap in received packets at the receiver  however, the receiver got all packets up to the gap and is actually receiving packets  therefore, packet loss is not due to congestion, continue with current congestion window (do not use slow-start) 10.2.1
  • 4. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport Influences of mobility on TCP-mechanisms TCP assumes congestion if packets are dropped  typically wrong in wireless networks, here we often have packet loss due to transmission errors  furthermore, mobility itself can cause packet loss, if e.g. a mobile node roams from one access point (e.g. foreign agent in Mobile IP) to another while there are still packets in transit to the wrong access point and forwarding is not possible The performance of an unchanged TCP degrades severely  however, TCP cannot be changed fundamentally due to the large base of installation in the fixed network, TCP for mobility has to remain compatible  the basic TCP mechanisms keep the whole Internet together 10.3.1
  • 5. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport Indirect TCP I Indirect TCP or I-TCP segments the connection  no changes to the TCP protocol for hosts connected to the wired Internet, millions of computers use (variants of) this protocol  optimized TCP protocol for mobile hosts  splitting of the TCP connection at, e.g., the foreign agent into 2 TCP connections, no real end-to-end connection any longer  hosts in the fixed part of the net do not notice the characteristics of the wireless part mobile host access point (foreign agent) „wired“ Internet „wireless“ TCP standard TCP 10.4.1
  • 6. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport I-TCP socket and state migration mobile host access point2 Internet access point1 socket migration and state transfer 10.5.1
  • 7. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport Indirect TCP II Advantages  no changes in the fixed network necessary, no changes for the hosts (TCP protocol) necessary, all current optimizations to TCP still work  transmission errors on the wireless link do not propagate into the fixed network  simple to control, mobile TCP is used only for one hop between, e.g., a foreign agent and mobile host  therefore, a very fast retransmission of packets is possible, the short delay on the mobile hop is known Disadvantages  loss of end-to-end semantics, an acknowledgement to a sender does now not any longer mean that a receiver really got a packet, foreign agents might crash  higher latency possible due to buffering of data within the foreign agent and forwarding to a new foreign agent 10.6.1
  • 8. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport Snooping TCP I „Transparent“ extension of TCP within the foreign agent  buffering of packets sent to the mobile host  lost packets on the wireless link (both directions!) will be retransmitted immediately by the mobile host or foreign agent, respectively (so called “local” retransmission)  the foreign agent therefore “snoops” the packet flow and recognizes acknowledgements in both directions, it also filters ACKs  changes of TCP only within the foreign agent „wired“ Internet buffering of data end-to-end TCP connection local retransmission 10.7.1 correspondent hostforeign agent mobile host snooping of ACKs
  • 9. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport Snooping TCP II Data transfer to the mobile host  FA buffers data until it receives ACK of the MH, FA detects packet loss via duplicated ACKs or time-out  fast retransmission possible, transparent for the fixed network Data transfer from the mobile host  FA detects packet loss on the wireless link via sequence numbers, FA answers directly with a NACK to the MH  MH can now retransmit data with only a very short delay Integration of the MAC layer  MAC layer often has similar mechanisms to those of TCP  thus, the MAC layer can already detect duplicated packets due to retransmissions and discard them Problems  snooping TCP does not isolate the wireless link as good as I-TCP  snooping might be useless depending on encryption schemes 10.8.1
  • 10. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport Mobile TCP Special handling of lengthy and/or frequent disconnections M-TCP splits as I-TCP does  unmodified TCP fixed network to supervisory host (SH)  optimized TCP SH to MH Supervisory host  no caching, no retransmission  monitors all packets, if disconnection detected  set sender window size to 0  sender automatically goes into persistent mode  old or new SH reopen the window Advantages  maintains semantics, supports disconnection, no buffer forwarding Disadvantages  loss on wireless link propagated into fixed network  adapted TCP on wireless link 10.9.1
  • 11. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport Fast retransmit/fast recovery Change of foreign agent often results in packet loss  TCP reacts with slow-start although there is no congestion Forced fast retransmit  as soon as the mobile host has registered with a new foreign agent, the MH sends duplicated acknowledgements on purpose  this forces the fast retransmit mode at the communication partners  additionally, the TCP on the MH is forced to continue sending with the actual window size and not to go into slow-start after registration Advantage  simple changes result in significant higher performance Disadvantage  further mix of IP and TCP, no transparent approach 10.10.1
  • 12. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport Transmission/time-out freezing Mobile hosts can be disconnected for a longer time  no packet exchange possible, e.g., in a tunnel, disconnection due to overloaded cells or mux. with higher priority traffic  TCP disconnects after time-out completely TCP freezing  MAC layer is often able to detect interruption in advance  MAC can inform TCP layer of upcoming loss of connection  TCP stops sending, but does now not assume a congested link  MAC layer signals again if reconnected Advantage  scheme is independent of data Disadvantage  TCP on mobile host has to be changed, mechanism depends on MAC layer 10.11.1
  • 13. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport Selective retransmission TCP acknowledgements are often cumulative  ACK n acknowledges correct and in-sequence receipt of packets up to n  if single packets are missing quite often a whole packet sequence beginning at the gap has to be retransmitted (go-back-n), thus wasting bandwidth Selective retransmission as one solution  RFC2018 allows for acknowledgements of single packets, not only acknowledgements of in-sequence packet streams without gaps  sender can now retransmit only the missing packets Advantage  much higher efficiency Disadvantage  more complex software in a receiver, more buffer needed at the receiver 10.12.1
  • 14. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport Transaction oriented TCP TCP phases  connection setup, data transmission, connection release  using 3-way-handshake needs 3 packets for setup and release, respectively  thus, even short messages need a minimum of 7 packets! Transaction oriented TCP  RFC1644, T-TCP, describes a TCP version to avoid this overhead  connection setup, data transfer and connection release can be combined  thus, only 2 or 3 packets are needed Advantage  efficiency Disadvantage  requires changed TCP  mobility not longer transparent 10.13.1
  • 15. Mobile Communications: Mobile Transport Comparison of different approaches for a “mobile” TCP Approach Mechanism Advantages Disadvantages Indirect TCP splits TCP connection into two connections isolation of wireless link, simple loss of TCP semantics, higher latency at handover Snooping TCP “snoops” data and acknowledgements, local retransmission transparent for end-to- end connection, MAC integration possible problematic with encryption, bad isolation of wireless link M-TCP splits TCP connection, chokes sender via window size Maintains end-to-end semantics, handles long term and frequent disconnections Bad isolation of wireless link, processing overhead due to bandwidth management Fast retransmit/ fast recovery avoids slow-start after roaming simple and efficient mixed layers, not transparent Transmission/ time-out freezing freezes TCP state at disconnect, resumes after reconnection independent of content or encryption, works for longer interrupts changes in TCP required, MAC dependant Selective retransmission retransmit only lost data very efficient slightly more complex receiver software, more buffer needed Transaction oriented TCP combine connection setup/release and data transmission Efficient for certain applications changes in TCP required, not transparent 10.14.1