SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 9
Corporate Finance

Assignment #2 – Ocean Carriers

EPGP 2009-10 - Term III- Individual Submission
6-Jan-2009




Instructor:     Prof. A. Kanagaraj

Submitted by:
                Rajendra Inani - #27




CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers     Page |1
Table of Contents

       2
1 Ocean Carriers - Recommendation....................................................................................................3
2 Reasons behind our recommendation...............................................................................................3
3 The calculations .................................................................................................................................3
   3.1 NPV with 25 years of operation.........................................................................................................5
   3.2 NPV with 15 years of operation.........................................................................................................7
4 Assignment Questions........................................................................................................................8
   4.1 Do you expect daily spot hire rates to increase or decrease next year?............................................8
   4.2 What factors derive average daily hire rates?...................................................................................8
   4.3 How would you characterize the LT prospects of the capesize dry bulk industry?............................8
   4.4 Should Ms Linn purchase the $39M capesize?..................................................................................8
   4.5 What do you think of the company's policy of not operating ships over 15 years old?.....................9




CF –Individual Assignment#1                                                                                                                Page |2
1    Ocean Carriers - Recommendation


The project is recommended for rejection of the proposal due to company policy of not operating
vessels older than 15 years. As explained in the later part of document, this project is not viable
within 15 years of vessel’s life.

The decision to move forward with this project is dependent on our company’s confidence in the
long term market demand for capsizes. If Australian and Indian ore exports begin in 2003 as
projected and demand for capsizes is increased, this project will return a positive NPV over the 25
year life of the ship. As the following data shows, the company policy to not operate vessels over 15
years may not necessarily produce maximum profits. Looking forward I would also suggest that the
company reevaluate this policy, and consider revamping it for future projects such as this.


2    Reasons behind our recommendation


Assuming the existence of sufficient long term demand and a full 25-year operating life of the vessel,
the end result would prove profitable for the company. However, if the life of the ship is reduced to
15 years pursuant to company policy, and subsequently sold for scrap, the project would result in a
loss for the company even when the scrap value is included.


3    The calculations


We take into account total expected revues over the life of the ship were calculated using the given
yearly operating days and hire rate data. Then, expected yearly operating costs were subtracted
from revenues to determine yearly cash flows from operations. To determine cash flows from
investment activities, the initial purchase of the carrier, working capital investment as well as capital
expenditures had to be taken into consideration. The vessel was purchased over a three-year time
period, and delivered at the end of 2002. At that time, a $500,000 investment in working capital was
injected, which was expected to grow with inflation over the life of the ship. Yearly investment cash
flows were determined using these figures. Providing a 9% discount rate, the total net present value
(NPV) of the yearly cash flow was determined for both a 25-year fully depreciated operating lifetime,
as well as a 15-year operating lifetime with a $5 million scrap value. It was determined that for this
project to be profitable, the ship would have to remain in operations for at least 22 years before it
returned a positive NPV figure. If operated for the full 25 years, total NPV of $368,557 is forecasted.
However, if the ship is operated for 15 years and then scrapped, a negative NPV of -$1,252,916
would result.



CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers                                                  Page |3
CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers
                                               Page |4
3.1 NPV with 25 years of operation


  Calendar  Expected Annual Exected Annual   Cash flow from                      Capital    Change in Net     Cash Flow from                     PV of Yearly cash PV of Rolling Cash
    Year       Revenue         Op. Costs       Operations   Cost of Equipment Expenditures Working Capital      Investment     Total Cash Flow         flow               Flow
       2000                                               0       (3,900,000)            0                         (3,900,000)       (3,900,000)      (3,900,000)        (3,900,000)
       2001                                               0       (3,900,000)            0                         (3,900,000)       (3,900,000)      (3,577,982)        (7,477,982)
       2002                                               0     (31,200,000)             0        500,000         (31,700,000)     (31,700,000)     (26,681,256)       (34,159,237)
       2003       7,140,000      1,460,000      5,680,000                                0          15,000            (15,000)        5,665,000        4,374,419       (29,784,818)
       2004       7,211,400      1,518,400      5,693,000                                0          15,450            (15,450)        5,677,550        4,022,120       (25,762,698)
       2005       7,282,800      1,579,136      5,703,664                                0          15,914            (15,914)        5,687,751        3,696,648       (22,066,051)
       2006       6,680,898      1,642,301      5,038,597                                0          16,391            (16,391)        5,022,206        2,994,577       (19,071,474)
       2007       6,170,031      1,707,993      4,462,038                         (300,000)         16,883            (16,883)        4,145,155        2,267,542       (16,803,932)
       2008       6,170,793      1,776,313      4,394,480                                0          17,389            (17,389)        4,377,091        2,196,714       (14,607,218)
       2009       6,241,746      1,847,366      4,394,380                                0          17,911            (17,911)        4,376,469        2,015,048       (12,592,170)
       2010       6,313,758      1,921,260      4,392,498                                0          18,448            (18,448)        4,374,049        1,847,646       (10,744,524)
       2011       6,386,476      1,998,111      4,388,365                                0          19,002            (19,002)        4,369,364        1,693,272         (9,051,252)
       2012       6,152,084      2,078,035      4,074,049                         (350,000)         19,572            (19,572)        3,704,477        1,317,070         (7,734,182)
       2013       6,152,172      2,161,157      3,991,015                                0          20,159            (20,159)        3,970,857        1,295,209         (6,438,973)
       2014       6,223,019      2,247,603      3,975,416                                0          20,764            (20,764)        3,954,653        1,183,416         (5,255,557)
       2015       6,294,564      2,337,507      3,957,057                                0          21,386            (21,386)        3,935,671        1,080,491         (4,175,066)
       2016       6,366,807      2,431,007      3,935,800                                0          22,028            (22,028)        3,913,772          985,761         (3,189,305)
       2017       5,151,938      2,528,248      2,623,690                         (750,000)         22,689            (22,689)        1,851,002          427,717         (2,761,589)
       2018       5,211,268      2,629,378      2,581,890                                0          23,370            (23,370)        2,558,521          542,390         (2,219,198)
       2019       5,271,296      2,734,553      2,536,743                                0          24,071            (24,071)        2,512,673          488,689         (1,730,509)
       2020       5,332,022      2,843,935      2,488,087                                0          24,793            (24,793)        2,463,295          439,528         (1,290,981)
       2021       5,393,446      2,957,692      2,435,754                                0          25,536            (25,536)        2,410,217          394,548           (896,433)
       2022       5,114,246      3,076,000      2,038,246                         (850,000)         26,303            (26,303)        1,161,944          174,503           (721,931)
       2023       5,173,227      3,199,040      1,974,187                                0          27,092            (27,092)        1,947,096          268,274           (453,657)
       2024       5,232,557      3,327,001      1,905,556                                0          27,904            (27,904)        1,877,651          237,344           (216,313)
       2025       5,292,934      3,460,081      1,832,853                                0          28,742            (28,742)        1,804,111          209,219              (7,094)
       2026       5,354,009      3,598,485      1,755,524                                0          29,604            (29,604)        1,725,921          183,625            176,531
       2027       4,693,352      3,742,424         950,928                               0      1,016,397           1,016,397         1,967,325          192,026            368,557



                                                                                                             Total 25 year NPV                          368,557



CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers                                                         Page |5
CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers   Page |6
3.2 NPV with 15 years of operation


 Calendar  Expected Annual Exected Annual Cash flow from                     Capital         Capital                      Cash Flow from                         PV of Yearly cash PV of Rolling Cash
   Year        Revenue        Op. Costs     Operatinos   Cost of Equipment Expenditures    Investment     Salvage Value     Investment       Total Cash Flow            flow              Flow
      2000                                             0       (3,900,000)            0                                        (3,900,000)         (3,900,000)       (3,900,000)         (3,900,000)
      2001                                             0       (3,900,000)            0                                        (3,900,000)         (3,900,000)       (3,577,982)         (7,477,982)
      2002                                             0     (31,200,000)             0         500,000                       (31,700,000)       (31,700,000)       (26,681,256)        (34,159,237)
      2003       7,140,000      1,460,000     5,680,000                               0          15,000                           (15,000)          5,665,000         4,374,419         (29,784,818)
      2004       7,211,400      1,518,400     5,693,000                               0          15,450                           (15,450)          5,677,550         4,022,120         (25,762,698)
      2005       7,282,800      1,579,136     5,703,664                               0          15,914                           (15,914)          5,687,751         3,696,648         (22,066,051)
      2006       6,680,898      1,642,301     5,038,597                               0          16,391                           (16,391)          5,022,206         2,994,577         (19,071,474)
      2007       6,170,031      1,707,993     4,462,038                        (300,000)         16,883                           (16,883)          4,145,155         2,267,542         (16,803,932)
      2008       6,170,793      1,776,313     4,394,480                               0          17,389                           (17,389)          4,377,091         2,196,714         (14,607,218)
      2009       6,241,746      1,847,366     4,394,380                               0          17,911                           (17,911)          4,376,469         2,015,048         (12,592,170)
      2010       6,313,758      1,921,260     4,392,498                               0          18,448                           (18,448)          4,374,049         1,847,646         (10,744,524)
      2011       6,386,476      1,998,111     4,388,365                               0          19,002                           (19,002)          4,369,364         1,693,272          (9,051,252)
      2012       6,152,084      2,078,035     4,074,049                        (350,000)         19,572                           (19,572)          3,704,477         1,317,070          (7,734,182)
      2013       6,152,172      2,161,157     3,991,015                               0          20,159                           (20,159)          3,970,857         1,295,209          (6,438,973)
      2014       6,223,019      2,247,603     3,975,416                               0          20,764                           (20,764)          3,954,653         1,183,416          (5,255,557)
      2015       6,294,564      2,337,507     3,957,057                               0          21,386                           (21,386)          3,935,671         1,080,491          (4,175,066)
      2016       6,366,807      2,431,007     3,935,800                               0          22,028                           (22,028)          3,913,772           985,761          (3,189,305)
      2017       5,151,938      2,528,248     2,623,690                               0         756,295      5,000,000            756,295           8,379,985         1,936,390          (1,252,916)



                                                                                                                          Total 15 year NPV                           (1,252,916)




CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers                                                                                                   Page |7
4   Assignment Questions

4.1 Do you expect daily spot hire rates to increase or decrease next year?

    Exhibit 3 shows order booking and delivery schedule for bulk capsizes for coming years. This is a
    big number compared to current fleet size as per exhibit 2. Thus, the spot hire rates are likely to
    drop because of availability of capsizes.

4.2 What factors derive average daily hire rates?

    Since the daily hire rate is determined by the supply and the demand for such services, we first
    take a look at the supply of Capesize vessels. Future supply of the capesize vessels is the sum of
    current vessels, minus the vessels that will be scraped, plus new ships delivered. Exhibit 2 shows
    the existing capesize carriers in terms of the sum of the loading capacity.

4.3 How would you characterize the LT prospects of the capesize dry bulk
      industry?


    Availability of fleet in the market and availability of transports good drives average daily hire
    rates. The daily hire rates would increase if Australia and India ore export starts in coming years.
    This would bring big business. In absence of a new business, due to increasing number of fleet
    and based on order booking, the average daily rates may drop.



    There are 2 million tons of capesize with the age over 24 years. We can expect that these old
    vessels would be soon scrapped, which in turn would reduce the supply of the capesize vessels.
    However, such old vessels were small portion of the total existing vessels. So we would not
    expect a large reduction in supply due to the scraping of old vessels.



    Exhibit 3 shows the current order of new capesize vessels delivered in the coming 4 years.

    As can be seen, there will be a large supply of new capesize vessels in 2001 2002 and 2003. This
    will increase the supply of capesize vessel in the near future.



4.4 Should Ms Linn purchase the $39M capesize?


        Answered in first part.


CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers                                                 Page |8
4.5 What do you think of the company's policy of not operating ships over 15
     years old?

   This is a conservative policy of company which saves company from uncertainty. But, due to this
   policy, it is not able to take advantage of returns on investment in later years of vessels. This
   policy is not giving favorable outlook for investment.




CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers
                                                                                         Page |9

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Acquisition of Mercury Athletic
Acquisition of Mercury AthleticAcquisition of Mercury Athletic
Acquisition of Mercury AthleticJB Gough
 
Roche's Acquisition of Genentech
Roche's Acquisition of GenentechRoche's Acquisition of Genentech
Roche's Acquisition of GenentechYu Cao
 
Heinz Case Study: ESTIMATING THE COST OF CAPITAL IN UNCERTAIN TIMES
Heinz Case Study: ESTIMATING THE COST OF CAPITAL IN UNCERTAIN TIMES Heinz Case Study: ESTIMATING THE COST OF CAPITAL IN UNCERTAIN TIMES
Heinz Case Study: ESTIMATING THE COST OF CAPITAL IN UNCERTAIN TIMES sadia butt
 
Marketing plan for Kellogg's new muesli product
Marketing plan for Kellogg's new muesli productMarketing plan for Kellogg's new muesli product
Marketing plan for Kellogg's new muesli productMuhammad Danish
 
Strategic+analysis+of+pia
Strategic+analysis+of+piaStrategic+analysis+of+pia
Strategic+analysis+of+piaBiztek
 
Beiersdorf ag expanding nivea’s global reach
Beiersdorf ag expanding nivea’s global reachBeiersdorf ag expanding nivea’s global reach
Beiersdorf ag expanding nivea’s global reachAyush Agrawal
 
Netscape IPO case study Analysis
Netscape IPO case study AnalysisNetscape IPO case study Analysis
Netscape IPO case study AnalysisTony Sebastian
 
Case study analysis of Virgin atlantic
Case study analysis of Virgin atlanticCase study analysis of Virgin atlantic
Case study analysis of Virgin atlanticVIVEK ANAND
 
Mercury athletic footwear
Mercury athletic footwearMercury athletic footwear
Mercury athletic footwearADITYA JATHAR
 
Mercury case
Mercury caseMercury case
Mercury caseTHAO BUI
 
Internal Analysis and Strategy Report - Lululemon
Internal Analysis and Strategy Report - LululemonInternal Analysis and Strategy Report - Lululemon
Internal Analysis and Strategy Report - LululemonKailey Cornett
 
General Mills, Inc.: Yoplait Custard-Style Yogurt
General Mills, Inc.: Yoplait Custard-Style YogurtGeneral Mills, Inc.: Yoplait Custard-Style Yogurt
General Mills, Inc.: Yoplait Custard-Style YogurtHandeazgur
 
Netscape IPO - Harvard Business Case
Netscape IPO - Harvard Business CaseNetscape IPO - Harvard Business Case
Netscape IPO - Harvard Business CaseKivanc Ozuolmez
 
Brand Management Final Exam Spring 2012
Brand Management Final Exam Spring 2012Brand Management Final Exam Spring 2012
Brand Management Final Exam Spring 2012Aglazer1
 
The globalization of cemex
The globalization of cemexThe globalization of cemex
The globalization of cemexPriyank Sharma
 

Mais procurados (20)

Acquisition of Mercury Athletic
Acquisition of Mercury AthleticAcquisition of Mercury Athletic
Acquisition of Mercury Athletic
 
Roche's Acquisition of Genentech
Roche's Acquisition of GenentechRoche's Acquisition of Genentech
Roche's Acquisition of Genentech
 
Heinz Case Study: ESTIMATING THE COST OF CAPITAL IN UNCERTAIN TIMES
Heinz Case Study: ESTIMATING THE COST OF CAPITAL IN UNCERTAIN TIMES Heinz Case Study: ESTIMATING THE COST OF CAPITAL IN UNCERTAIN TIMES
Heinz Case Study: ESTIMATING THE COST OF CAPITAL IN UNCERTAIN TIMES
 
Marketing plan for Kellogg's new muesli product
Marketing plan for Kellogg's new muesli productMarketing plan for Kellogg's new muesli product
Marketing plan for Kellogg's new muesli product
 
Altius Presentation
Altius PresentationAltius Presentation
Altius Presentation
 
CPNSFinalPaper
CPNSFinalPaperCPNSFinalPaper
CPNSFinalPaper
 
Cola wars between Cocacola and Pepsi
Cola wars between Cocacola and PepsiCola wars between Cocacola and Pepsi
Cola wars between Cocacola and Pepsi
 
Strategic+analysis+of+pia
Strategic+analysis+of+piaStrategic+analysis+of+pia
Strategic+analysis+of+pia
 
Beiersdorf ag expanding nivea’s global reach
Beiersdorf ag expanding nivea’s global reachBeiersdorf ag expanding nivea’s global reach
Beiersdorf ag expanding nivea’s global reach
 
Super Project
Super ProjectSuper Project
Super Project
 
Netscape IPO case study Analysis
Netscape IPO case study AnalysisNetscape IPO case study Analysis
Netscape IPO case study Analysis
 
Case study analysis of Virgin atlantic
Case study analysis of Virgin atlanticCase study analysis of Virgin atlantic
Case study analysis of Virgin atlantic
 
Mercury athletic footwear
Mercury athletic footwearMercury athletic footwear
Mercury athletic footwear
 
Mercury case
Mercury caseMercury case
Mercury case
 
Internal Analysis and Strategy Report - Lululemon
Internal Analysis and Strategy Report - LululemonInternal Analysis and Strategy Report - Lululemon
Internal Analysis and Strategy Report - Lululemon
 
General Mills, Inc.: Yoplait Custard-Style Yogurt
General Mills, Inc.: Yoplait Custard-Style YogurtGeneral Mills, Inc.: Yoplait Custard-Style Yogurt
General Mills, Inc.: Yoplait Custard-Style Yogurt
 
Netscape IPO - Harvard Business Case
Netscape IPO - Harvard Business CaseNetscape IPO - Harvard Business Case
Netscape IPO - Harvard Business Case
 
M&A Project
M&A ProjectM&A Project
M&A Project
 
Brand Management Final Exam Spring 2012
Brand Management Final Exam Spring 2012Brand Management Final Exam Spring 2012
Brand Management Final Exam Spring 2012
 
The globalization of cemex
The globalization of cemexThe globalization of cemex
The globalization of cemex
 

Semelhante a Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#2_6jan10

CHRSA P&L
CHRSA P&LCHRSA P&L
CHRSA P&Lmmazner
 
Abch group results booklet 2010
Abch group results booklet 2010Abch group results booklet 2010
Abch group results booklet 2010wgjlubbe
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q 04_Supplementalalltel  4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q 04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplementalfinance27
 
4Q04_Supplemental
4Q04_Supplemental4Q04_Supplemental
4Q04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q 04_Supplementalalltel  4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q 04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q 04_Supplementalalltel  4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q 04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q 04_Supplementalalltel  4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q 04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q 04_Supplementalalltel  4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q 04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplementalfinance27
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplementalfinance27
 

Semelhante a Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#2_6jan10 (20)

CHRSA P&L
CHRSA P&LCHRSA P&L
CHRSA P&L
 
Abch group results booklet 2010
Abch group results booklet 2010Abch group results booklet 2010
Abch group results booklet 2010
 
Elite Builder
Elite BuilderElite Builder
Elite Builder
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q 04_Supplementalalltel  4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
 
4Q04_Supplemental
4Q04_Supplemental4Q04_Supplemental
4Q04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q 04_Supplementalalltel  4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q 04_Supplementalalltel  4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q 04_Supplementalalltel  4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q 04_Supplementalalltel  4Q 04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q 04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
 
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
alltel  4Q04_Supplementalalltel  4Q04_Supplemental
alltel 4Q04_Supplemental
 

Mais de Rajendra Inani

Dcv iimiccdvsallocfinal
Dcv   iimiccdvsallocfinalDcv   iimiccdvsallocfinal
Dcv iimiccdvsallocfinalRajendra Inani
 
Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1
Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1
Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1Rajendra Inani
 
Merrimack tractors analysis - final
Merrimack tractors   analysis - finalMerrimack tractors   analysis - final
Merrimack tractors analysis - finalRajendra Inani
 
Maharashtra state road development corporation
Maharashtra state road development corporationMaharashtra state road development corporation
Maharashtra state road development corporationRajendra Inani
 
Group 8 epgp - meeting management - communication presentation
Group 8   epgp - meeting management - communication presentationGroup 8   epgp - meeting management - communication presentation
Group 8 epgp - meeting management - communication presentationRajendra Inani
 
Fra coca - cola case study
Fra   coca - cola case studyFra   coca - cola case study
Fra coca - cola case studyRajendra Inani
 
Explore indore rajendra inani
Explore indore   rajendra inaniExplore indore   rajendra inani
Explore indore rajendra inaniRajendra Inani
 
Epgp bm brand_extensions_ppt
Epgp bm brand_extensions_pptEpgp bm brand_extensions_ppt
Epgp bm brand_extensions_pptRajendra Inani
 
Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09
Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09
Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp term v mos group assignment april 2010
Epgp term v mos  group assignment april 2010Epgp term v mos  group assignment april 2010
Epgp term v mos group assignment april 2010Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp 09 10 -fra term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inani
Epgp 09 10 -fra  term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inaniEpgp 09 10 -fra  term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inani
Epgp 09 10 -fra term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inaniRajendra Inani
 
Epgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viii
Epgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viiiEpgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viii
Epgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viiiRajendra Inani
 
Epgp 09 10 -ccv term 1 - project submission - rajendra inani
Epgp 09 10 -ccv  term 1 - project submission - rajendra inaniEpgp 09 10 -ccv  term 1 - project submission - rajendra inani
Epgp 09 10 -ccv term 1 - project submission - rajendra inaniRajendra Inani
 

Mais de Rajendra Inani (20)

Dcv iimiccdvsallocfinal
Dcv   iimiccdvsallocfinalDcv   iimiccdvsallocfinal
Dcv iimiccdvsallocfinal
 
Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1
Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1
Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1
 
Msrdc case study
Msrdc case studyMsrdc case study
Msrdc case study
 
Merrimack tractors analysis - final
Merrimack tractors   analysis - finalMerrimack tractors   analysis - final
Merrimack tractors analysis - final
 
Maharashtra state road development corporation
Maharashtra state road development corporationMaharashtra state road development corporation
Maharashtra state road development corporation
 
Group 8 epgp - meeting management - communication presentation
Group 8   epgp - meeting management - communication presentationGroup 8   epgp - meeting management - communication presentation
Group 8 epgp - meeting management - communication presentation
 
Fra coca - cola case study
Fra   coca - cola case studyFra   coca - cola case study
Fra coca - cola case study
 
Explore indore rajendra inani
Explore indore   rajendra inaniExplore indore   rajendra inani
Explore indore rajendra inani
 
Epgp bm brand_extensions_ppt
Epgp bm brand_extensions_pptEpgp bm brand_extensions_ppt
Epgp bm brand_extensions_ppt
 
Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09
Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09
Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09
 
Epgp term v mos group assignment april 2010
Epgp term v mos  group assignment april 2010Epgp term v mos  group assignment april 2010
Epgp term v mos group assignment april 2010
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10
 
Epgp 09 10 -fra term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inani
Epgp 09 10 -fra  term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inaniEpgp 09 10 -fra  term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inani
Epgp 09 10 -fra term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inani
 
Epgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viii
Epgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viiiEpgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viii
Epgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viii
 
Epgp 09 10 -ccv term 1 - project submission - rajendra inani
Epgp 09 10 -ccv  term 1 - project submission - rajendra inaniEpgp 09 10 -ccv  term 1 - project submission - rajendra inani
Epgp 09 10 -ccv term 1 - project submission - rajendra inani
 

Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#2_6jan10

  • 1. Corporate Finance Assignment #2 – Ocean Carriers EPGP 2009-10 - Term III- Individual Submission 6-Jan-2009 Instructor: Prof. A. Kanagaraj Submitted by: Rajendra Inani - #27 CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers Page |1
  • 2. Table of Contents 2 1 Ocean Carriers - Recommendation....................................................................................................3 2 Reasons behind our recommendation...............................................................................................3 3 The calculations .................................................................................................................................3 3.1 NPV with 25 years of operation.........................................................................................................5 3.2 NPV with 15 years of operation.........................................................................................................7 4 Assignment Questions........................................................................................................................8 4.1 Do you expect daily spot hire rates to increase or decrease next year?............................................8 4.2 What factors derive average daily hire rates?...................................................................................8 4.3 How would you characterize the LT prospects of the capesize dry bulk industry?............................8 4.4 Should Ms Linn purchase the $39M capesize?..................................................................................8 4.5 What do you think of the company's policy of not operating ships over 15 years old?.....................9 CF –Individual Assignment#1 Page |2
  • 3. 1 Ocean Carriers - Recommendation The project is recommended for rejection of the proposal due to company policy of not operating vessels older than 15 years. As explained in the later part of document, this project is not viable within 15 years of vessel’s life. The decision to move forward with this project is dependent on our company’s confidence in the long term market demand for capsizes. If Australian and Indian ore exports begin in 2003 as projected and demand for capsizes is increased, this project will return a positive NPV over the 25 year life of the ship. As the following data shows, the company policy to not operate vessels over 15 years may not necessarily produce maximum profits. Looking forward I would also suggest that the company reevaluate this policy, and consider revamping it for future projects such as this. 2 Reasons behind our recommendation Assuming the existence of sufficient long term demand and a full 25-year operating life of the vessel, the end result would prove profitable for the company. However, if the life of the ship is reduced to 15 years pursuant to company policy, and subsequently sold for scrap, the project would result in a loss for the company even when the scrap value is included. 3 The calculations We take into account total expected revues over the life of the ship were calculated using the given yearly operating days and hire rate data. Then, expected yearly operating costs were subtracted from revenues to determine yearly cash flows from operations. To determine cash flows from investment activities, the initial purchase of the carrier, working capital investment as well as capital expenditures had to be taken into consideration. The vessel was purchased over a three-year time period, and delivered at the end of 2002. At that time, a $500,000 investment in working capital was injected, which was expected to grow with inflation over the life of the ship. Yearly investment cash flows were determined using these figures. Providing a 9% discount rate, the total net present value (NPV) of the yearly cash flow was determined for both a 25-year fully depreciated operating lifetime, as well as a 15-year operating lifetime with a $5 million scrap value. It was determined that for this project to be profitable, the ship would have to remain in operations for at least 22 years before it returned a positive NPV figure. If operated for the full 25 years, total NPV of $368,557 is forecasted. However, if the ship is operated for 15 years and then scrapped, a negative NPV of -$1,252,916 would result. CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers Page |3
  • 4. CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers Page |4
  • 5. 3.1 NPV with 25 years of operation Calendar Expected Annual Exected Annual Cash flow from Capital Change in Net Cash Flow from PV of Yearly cash PV of Rolling Cash Year Revenue Op. Costs Operations Cost of Equipment Expenditures Working Capital Investment Total Cash Flow flow Flow 2000 0 (3,900,000) 0 (3,900,000) (3,900,000) (3,900,000) (3,900,000) 2001 0 (3,900,000) 0 (3,900,000) (3,900,000) (3,577,982) (7,477,982) 2002 0 (31,200,000) 0 500,000 (31,700,000) (31,700,000) (26,681,256) (34,159,237) 2003 7,140,000 1,460,000 5,680,000 0 15,000 (15,000) 5,665,000 4,374,419 (29,784,818) 2004 7,211,400 1,518,400 5,693,000 0 15,450 (15,450) 5,677,550 4,022,120 (25,762,698) 2005 7,282,800 1,579,136 5,703,664 0 15,914 (15,914) 5,687,751 3,696,648 (22,066,051) 2006 6,680,898 1,642,301 5,038,597 0 16,391 (16,391) 5,022,206 2,994,577 (19,071,474) 2007 6,170,031 1,707,993 4,462,038 (300,000) 16,883 (16,883) 4,145,155 2,267,542 (16,803,932) 2008 6,170,793 1,776,313 4,394,480 0 17,389 (17,389) 4,377,091 2,196,714 (14,607,218) 2009 6,241,746 1,847,366 4,394,380 0 17,911 (17,911) 4,376,469 2,015,048 (12,592,170) 2010 6,313,758 1,921,260 4,392,498 0 18,448 (18,448) 4,374,049 1,847,646 (10,744,524) 2011 6,386,476 1,998,111 4,388,365 0 19,002 (19,002) 4,369,364 1,693,272 (9,051,252) 2012 6,152,084 2,078,035 4,074,049 (350,000) 19,572 (19,572) 3,704,477 1,317,070 (7,734,182) 2013 6,152,172 2,161,157 3,991,015 0 20,159 (20,159) 3,970,857 1,295,209 (6,438,973) 2014 6,223,019 2,247,603 3,975,416 0 20,764 (20,764) 3,954,653 1,183,416 (5,255,557) 2015 6,294,564 2,337,507 3,957,057 0 21,386 (21,386) 3,935,671 1,080,491 (4,175,066) 2016 6,366,807 2,431,007 3,935,800 0 22,028 (22,028) 3,913,772 985,761 (3,189,305) 2017 5,151,938 2,528,248 2,623,690 (750,000) 22,689 (22,689) 1,851,002 427,717 (2,761,589) 2018 5,211,268 2,629,378 2,581,890 0 23,370 (23,370) 2,558,521 542,390 (2,219,198) 2019 5,271,296 2,734,553 2,536,743 0 24,071 (24,071) 2,512,673 488,689 (1,730,509) 2020 5,332,022 2,843,935 2,488,087 0 24,793 (24,793) 2,463,295 439,528 (1,290,981) 2021 5,393,446 2,957,692 2,435,754 0 25,536 (25,536) 2,410,217 394,548 (896,433) 2022 5,114,246 3,076,000 2,038,246 (850,000) 26,303 (26,303) 1,161,944 174,503 (721,931) 2023 5,173,227 3,199,040 1,974,187 0 27,092 (27,092) 1,947,096 268,274 (453,657) 2024 5,232,557 3,327,001 1,905,556 0 27,904 (27,904) 1,877,651 237,344 (216,313) 2025 5,292,934 3,460,081 1,832,853 0 28,742 (28,742) 1,804,111 209,219 (7,094) 2026 5,354,009 3,598,485 1,755,524 0 29,604 (29,604) 1,725,921 183,625 176,531 2027 4,693,352 3,742,424 950,928 0 1,016,397 1,016,397 1,967,325 192,026 368,557 Total 25 year NPV 368,557 CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers Page |5
  • 6. CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers Page |6
  • 7. 3.2 NPV with 15 years of operation Calendar Expected Annual Exected Annual Cash flow from Capital Capital Cash Flow from PV of Yearly cash PV of Rolling Cash Year Revenue Op. Costs Operatinos Cost of Equipment Expenditures Investment Salvage Value Investment Total Cash Flow flow Flow 2000 0 (3,900,000) 0 (3,900,000) (3,900,000) (3,900,000) (3,900,000) 2001 0 (3,900,000) 0 (3,900,000) (3,900,000) (3,577,982) (7,477,982) 2002 0 (31,200,000) 0 500,000 (31,700,000) (31,700,000) (26,681,256) (34,159,237) 2003 7,140,000 1,460,000 5,680,000 0 15,000 (15,000) 5,665,000 4,374,419 (29,784,818) 2004 7,211,400 1,518,400 5,693,000 0 15,450 (15,450) 5,677,550 4,022,120 (25,762,698) 2005 7,282,800 1,579,136 5,703,664 0 15,914 (15,914) 5,687,751 3,696,648 (22,066,051) 2006 6,680,898 1,642,301 5,038,597 0 16,391 (16,391) 5,022,206 2,994,577 (19,071,474) 2007 6,170,031 1,707,993 4,462,038 (300,000) 16,883 (16,883) 4,145,155 2,267,542 (16,803,932) 2008 6,170,793 1,776,313 4,394,480 0 17,389 (17,389) 4,377,091 2,196,714 (14,607,218) 2009 6,241,746 1,847,366 4,394,380 0 17,911 (17,911) 4,376,469 2,015,048 (12,592,170) 2010 6,313,758 1,921,260 4,392,498 0 18,448 (18,448) 4,374,049 1,847,646 (10,744,524) 2011 6,386,476 1,998,111 4,388,365 0 19,002 (19,002) 4,369,364 1,693,272 (9,051,252) 2012 6,152,084 2,078,035 4,074,049 (350,000) 19,572 (19,572) 3,704,477 1,317,070 (7,734,182) 2013 6,152,172 2,161,157 3,991,015 0 20,159 (20,159) 3,970,857 1,295,209 (6,438,973) 2014 6,223,019 2,247,603 3,975,416 0 20,764 (20,764) 3,954,653 1,183,416 (5,255,557) 2015 6,294,564 2,337,507 3,957,057 0 21,386 (21,386) 3,935,671 1,080,491 (4,175,066) 2016 6,366,807 2,431,007 3,935,800 0 22,028 (22,028) 3,913,772 985,761 (3,189,305) 2017 5,151,938 2,528,248 2,623,690 0 756,295 5,000,000 756,295 8,379,985 1,936,390 (1,252,916) Total 15 year NPV (1,252,916) CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers Page |7
  • 8. 4 Assignment Questions 4.1 Do you expect daily spot hire rates to increase or decrease next year? Exhibit 3 shows order booking and delivery schedule for bulk capsizes for coming years. This is a big number compared to current fleet size as per exhibit 2. Thus, the spot hire rates are likely to drop because of availability of capsizes. 4.2 What factors derive average daily hire rates? Since the daily hire rate is determined by the supply and the demand for such services, we first take a look at the supply of Capesize vessels. Future supply of the capesize vessels is the sum of current vessels, minus the vessels that will be scraped, plus new ships delivered. Exhibit 2 shows the existing capesize carriers in terms of the sum of the loading capacity. 4.3 How would you characterize the LT prospects of the capesize dry bulk industry? Availability of fleet in the market and availability of transports good drives average daily hire rates. The daily hire rates would increase if Australia and India ore export starts in coming years. This would bring big business. In absence of a new business, due to increasing number of fleet and based on order booking, the average daily rates may drop. There are 2 million tons of capesize with the age over 24 years. We can expect that these old vessels would be soon scrapped, which in turn would reduce the supply of the capesize vessels. However, such old vessels were small portion of the total existing vessels. So we would not expect a large reduction in supply due to the scraping of old vessels. Exhibit 3 shows the current order of new capesize vessels delivered in the coming 4 years. As can be seen, there will be a large supply of new capesize vessels in 2001 2002 and 2003. This will increase the supply of capesize vessel in the near future. 4.4 Should Ms Linn purchase the $39M capesize? Answered in first part. CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers Page |8
  • 9. 4.5 What do you think of the company's policy of not operating ships over 15 years old? This is a conservative policy of company which saves company from uncertainty. But, due to this policy, it is not able to take advantage of returns on investment in later years of vessels. This policy is not giving favorable outlook for investment. CF –Individual Assignment#2 – Ocean Carriers Page |9