This document outlines an upcoming webinar hosted by Acumen, a project management software company, that will discuss scheduling best practices and demonstrate their analytics platform Fuse. The webinar will feature three user stories from Marathon, Florida Power & Light, and an unnamed EPC discussing how they use Fuse metrics and analytics to improve project planning and monitoring. It will also announce Acumen's upcoming annual user summit in September focused on hands-on Fuse training and presentations on scheduling and risk management.
2. // Using your control panel
GotoWebinar
To minimize the
window, click the
red arrow.
Does Fuse integrate with P6?
To ask a
question, simply
type it in the chat
window.
July 12, 2012 // 2
3. // Acumen Realistic Scheduling
Proven Project Analytics // S1 The Base
// S2 Critiqued
◦ Project management software // S3 Risk-Adjusted
company // S4 Optimized
◦ Insight into challenges & use of // S5 Team-Aligned
analytics to overcome them
◦ Core Concepts: Product Offerings
1. Project success requires a sound plan Acumen Fuse®
2. Forecast accuracy requires risk Risk Workshops
consideration
Software Training
July 12, 2012 // 3
8. // Josh Rowan
Project Controls – Marathon
Objective: Focus on lean program delivery through
efficient allocation of capital and field resources.
Metrics & Criteria:
◦ Schedule ready for risk analysis
◦ Custom metrics for well readiness / operations
Outcome:
◦ Real-time reporting on performance variance,
trending, and resource deficiency
◦ Collaboration & alignment between stakeholder
groups
July 12, 2012 // 8
9. // Marathon Custom Metrics
◦ What gets measured gets monitored
◦ Provide clear line-of-sight into program
drivers based on cycle times
◦ Data is both granular and aggregated for
analysis
◦ Specialized codes allow for tracking of key
components by group (e.g. land, regulatory,
drilling, etc.)
◦ KPIs and metrics leveraged for improved
operational and financial planning
July 12, 2012 // 9
10. // Marathon Custom Report
◦ Historical planning tools were separate and not
combined
◦ Lack of integration prevented delay analysis/impact
and resource evaluation
◦ Current state: Primavera P6 with customized,
graphical reporting from Acumen Fuse
◦ New reports leverage “data rich” format
◦ Allow asset management and senior leaders to
assess health of well inventory
◦ Highlights “idle” or wasted time for crews, rigs, etc
July 12, 2012 // 10
12. // Dwayne Arnold
FPL/EPU Unit 2 Outage Lead Scheduler
Objective: Faster, more efficient means of
running daily schedule health and baseline
critiques.
Metrics & Criteria:
◦ DCMA 14 Point Assessment Metrics
◦ Custom FPL metrics
◦ Forensic Analysis to identify schedule
changes
July 12, 2012 // 12
13. // Dwayne Arnold
FPL/EPU Unit 2 Outage Lead Scheduler
Project Analysis Details:
◦ 40,000 activity schedule
◦ Filter for EPU activities specifically
◦ Analyze Schedule Health using a combination of the DCMA 14
Point Assessment library & FPL Custom metrics
◦ Various contractors all updating the schedule
◦ Identify changes made to the schedule using Fuse Forensic
Analyzer
◦ Quick Turnaround
◦ Schedule taken offline at 7am for checks, needs to be back up
by 10am
July 12, 2012 // 13
14. // Florida Power & Light
Custom Metrics
◦ Number of emergent activities added
◦ Number of activities riding the data date
◦ Number of activities with duration > 24
hours without a BINGO sheet
July 12, 2012 // 14