1. SONA Q3 :July- September
“Health + Performances = Success"
2. PARAMETERs:
PERFORMANCEs: - Exchange
- Exchange + Leadership
- Leadership Role
- Members
- n° of member for each X realized
HEALTH : - costumers relation
- Exchange
- Communication
- Talent Management
- Finance
- Organizational Structure
3. Modality of Evaluation:
1. Each Parameter has a score
2. I define the total score for performance and health
3. I calculate an average between performance and
health
4. The average is the indicator for the status of each
LC
11. NAPOLI FEDERICO II
NAPOLI FEDERICO II
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
Customer
Relation
Exchange
Organizational
Structure
Communication
Finance
Talent
Management
Serie1
22. RANKING Q3
LCs (30 Sept 2010)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Ancona
BariBolzanoCataniaGenova
M
ilano
Cattolica
NapoliFederico
2
NapoliParthenopePalerm
o
Pavia
Pisa
Rom
a
SapienzaRom
a
Tre
Torino
Trento
TriesteVenezia
Serie1
23. Instructions for graphic
With the graphic you can identify the area that you
have to improve
In the next slide you can see the best LCs for each
subsystem
You have contact them in order to understand what
they did and cover your gaps
Try to be RESPONSIBLE
24. Best LC for each subsystem
Costumer Relation: Torino, Palermo
Exchange: Napoli Federico II, Torino, Trieste
Organizational Structure:Torino
Communication: Milano Cattolica, Pavia
Finance:Venezia
Talent Management:Torino
26. 1th Cluster
8 X 3 X+L 3 LR
15 M 18-24 H
AVERAGE
8,9 – 12,6
No one LC is
in this cluster
for the 1th
quarter
27. 2th Cluster
3 X 2 X+L 1 LR
5 M 12-17 H
AVERAGE
5,7 – 8,8
LC:
-Milano Cattolica
-Napoli Federico II
-Torino
28. 3th Cluster
1 X 1 X+L 0 LR
0 M 6-11 H
AVERAGE
0 – 5,6
LCs
Ancona
Bari
Bolzano
Catania
Genova
Napoli Pathenope
Palermo
Pavia
Pisa
Roma Sapienza
Roma Tre
Trento
Trieste
Venezia
29. Italian Do it Better…
For each question you can contact Silvia,
MCVP LCD & Project
Silvia.prastani@aiesec.net
Good Work…
