Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Open Forum 3/10/2011
•
2 gostaram•13,368 visualizações
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Destaque
Último
Último (20)
Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Open Forum 3/10/2011
- 1. COMMUNITY MEETINGS 3.10.2011 COMPREHENSIVE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY GouldEvans
- 2. SCHEDULE Comprehensive Campus Master Plan PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSTIY Gould Evans 28 July 2010 2010 2011 M J J A S O N D J F M Steering Committee Meetings * TOWN HALL MEETINGS PHASE 1 - RESEARCH * Project Initiation Project Orientation * Data Gathering Strategic Plan Audit Campus Site Audit Campus Facilities Audit Stakeholder Meetings MEP Systems Assessment Traffic Assessment Space Needs Assessment Data Assessment * Review Findings PHASE 2 - EXPLORATION Alternatives * Consider Alternatives Plan Direction * Define Desired Direction PHASE 3 - DIRECTION Master Plan Document Implementation Strategy * Reviews of Draft Plan Adoption
- 4. GOALS • BE PROACTIVE IN PROVIDING A PLANNED AND PURPOSEFUL FUTURE • ENHANCE THE LEARNING AND LIVING ENVIRONMENT • ALIGN FACILITIES WITH STRATEGIC NEEDS AND GROWTH • RECOGNIZE AND BRIDGE THE EAST AND WEST AREAS OF CAMPUS • MAXIMIZE OPERATING EFFICIENCIES • FOSTER A SAFE AND SECURE CAMPUS • DEFINE & ENHANCE CAMPUS AESTHETICS • ENHANCE ENGAGEMENT WITH EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS • INSTITUTIONALIZE ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
- 5. A voluntary, self-assessment tool providing a clear and thorough system by which higher education institutions can benchmark where they are today and set goals for the future.
- 6. EXHIBIT: UNIVERSITY PROPERTY LINE
- 8. EXHIBIT: CURRENT CAMPUS PLAN
- 9. EXHIBIT: UNIVERSITY-OWNED REAL ESTATE
- 10. A. B. A: greek housing B: apartments EXHIBIT: OTHER REAL ESTATE ON CAMPUS
- 11. Academic Physical Plant University Housing Recreation/Athletics Administration Student/Faculty Other EXHIBIT: USE DISTRICTS
- 12. A. B. A: view from west B: view from south EXHIBIT: OPEN SPACE
- 14. Parking EXHIBIT: ROADWAYS AND PARKING
- 15. 40% 13% 20% 19% 8% +/- 4,000 SPACES EXHIBIT: PARKING DISTRIBUTION
- 24. 5 min. 10 min. 15 min. 20 min. EXHIBIT: WALKABILITY
- 25. B. A. Positive Neutral Negative A: approach from south B: approach from west EXHIBIT: EXTERIOR CHARACTER
- 26. Good/Excellent Neutral Poor/Unsatisfactory EXHIBIT: EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITIONS
- 27. Good/Excellent Neutral Poor/Unsatisfactory EXHIBIT: INTERIOR BUILDING CONDITIONS
- 28. Good/Excellent Neutral Poor/Unsatisfactory EXHIBIT: ENGINEERED SYSTEMS CONDITIONS
- 31. 8AM 9AM 10AM 11AM 12AM 1PM 2PM 3PM 8AM 9:30AM11AM 12:30PM 2PM 3:30PM FAMILY CONSUMER SCIENCE GRUBBS HALL HARTMAN HALL HUGHES HALL KELCE HALL KANSAS TECHNOLOGY CENTER PORTER HALLMCPHERSON HALL RUSS HALL WEEDE HALL STUDENT REC CENTER WHITESITT HALL YATES HALL M.W.F. SCHEDULE T.TH. SCHEDULE
- 32. 22.2% ROOM CAP 38.9% 48.4% 43.9% 50.1% 26.5% COURSE CAP FILLED SEATS 24.0% 51.3% 2090 23.6% 2891 1727 1958 CLASSROOM 1837 2061 UTILIZATION 1737 1611 4761 1359 1082 2562 1142 22.5% 9.6% 926 35.8% 1509 1677 15.5% 583 411 467 531 586 257 169 229 GH HH KC MH PH RH REC WH HA MP FAM YH KTC
- 33. .FIT COURSE VS. CLASSROOM STOCK
- 34. 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 COURSE STOCK 0-20 24 74 21-40 264 440 41-60 61 208 61-80 17 72 CLASSROOM STOCK 81-100 18 24 100+ 0 24 229 CAMPUS: COURSE VS. CLASSROOM STOCK
- 35. NEED MORE 0-20 CAP 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 CLASSROOMS COURSE STOCK 0-20 24 74 21-40 264 440 41-60 61 208 61-80 17 72 CLASSROOM STOCK 81-100 1824 OVERAGE OF LARGER 100+ 0 24 CLASSROOM STOCK 229 CAMPUS: COURSE VS. CLASSROOM STOCK
- 36. UTILIZATION: PART II: LAB ANALYSIS
- 37. 8AM 9AM 10AM 11AM 12AM 1PM 2PM 3PM 8AM 9:30AM11AM 12:30PM 2PM 3:30PM FAMILY CONSUMER SCIENCE GRUBBS HALL HUGHES HALLHECKERT-WELLS HALL KANSAS TECHNOLOGY CENTER PORTER HALL STUDENT REC CENTER WHITESITT HALL YATES HALL M.W.F. SCHEDULE T.TH. SCHEDULE
- 38. ROOM CAP 27.1% 29.8% FILLED SEATS LAB UTILIZATION 2129 41.1% 791 1611 23.6% 2016 35.9% 943 856 28.7% 665 610 660 10.4% 29.5% 17.9% 365 531 215 141 342 230 204 HW GH HH PH KTC REC YH FAM MH
- 39. ROOM CAP 27.1% COURSE 29.8% CAP FILLED SEATS LAB UTILIZATION 2129 41.1% 791 1611 23.6% 2016 35.9% 943 856 28.7% 665 610 660 10.4% 29.5% 17.9% 365 531 215 141 342 230 204 HW GH HH PH KTC REC YH FAM MH
- 40. PH RH MP 1.4% 0.1% 5.4% MH REC 14 0.7% 1.5% WH 3.3% KTC 4.0% BUILDINGS YH 78 4.7% FAM KC 0.5% 5.7% GH 5.1% CLASSROOMS HH 2.7% HA 0.2% CLASSROOM UTILIZATION
- 41. 900 during peak hours (9am – 3pm) underutilized building capacity 800 700 FAM GH 600 HA building capacity HH HW 500 KC KTC 400 MH MP 300 PH REC 200 RH TBA 100 WE WH 0 YH 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 Night BUILDING UTILIZATION time of day
- 42. .TARGETS CLASSROOM BUILDING CAMPUS
- 43. CLASSROOMS UTILIZED 6 OF 8 PERIODS OF % THE DAY TARGET BUILDING UTILIZATION
- 44. CLASSROOMS FILLED TO 80% OF CAPACITY % TARGET CLASSROOM UTILIZATION
- 45. % % TARGET BUILDING UTILIZATION TARGET CLASSROOM UTILIZATION
- 46. = % TARGET CAMPUS UTILIZATION
- 47. % % TARGET CAMPUS UTILIZATION CURRENT CAMPUS UTILIZATION
- 48. STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS • PRESIDENT, PROVOST, ADMINISTRATIVE VICE PRESIDENTS • DEANS, ARTS & SCIENCES, BUSINESS, EDUCATION, TECHNOLOGY, CONTINUING & GRADUATE STUDIES, ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT & STUDENT SUCCESS • CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER, DIRECTORS OF FACILITIES PLANNING, BUILDING TRADES & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, AND CUSTODIAL & GENERAL SERVICES • ATHLETICS •DIRECTORS OF CAMPUS LIFE & AUXILIARY SERVICES, UNIVERSITY HOUSING, STUDENT CENTER, CAMPUS RECREATION, UNIVERSITY POLICE & PARKING SERVICES • CAMPUS SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE • CITY OF PITTSBURG
- 51. GUIDING CONCLUSIONS • MASTER PLAN PROVIDES A PATTERN FOR LONG TERM DEVELOPMENT • OVERALL CAMPUS GROWTH IS PLANNED AT 1% TO 2% PER YEAR • KTC GROWTH IS AT 5% TO 7% PER YEAR • GROWTH FOR OTHER DEPARTMENTS ON CAMPUS REMAIN BASICALY STABLE • THE STOCK OF SMALL CLASSROOMS ON CAMPUS NEEDS TO BE INCREASED • HARTMAN REPRESENTS A REASONABLE OPTION FOR ADDITIONAL CLASSROOMS AND/OR LABS
- 52. RECOMMENDATIONS • EACH DEPARTMENT HAS UNIQUE FACILITY ISSUES – INCLUDING SPECIFIC NEEDS SUCH AS ACCESIBILITY, TEACHING SPACE, STUDY/WORK/SOCIAL SPACE, CONFERENCE SPACE, AND FACULTY OFFICE SPACE – WHICH SHOULD BE ADDRESSED ON A RENOVATION AND/OR EXPANSION BASIS BUILDING BY BUILDING • A SMALL STOCK OF GENERAL CLASSROOMS SHOULD BE UTILIZED AS A RELIEF VALVE FOR SCHEDULING ISSUES • PARKING ON CAMPUS SHOULD BE EXPANDED IN PROPORTION TO SPACE EXPANSION • HOUSING SHOULD BE EXPANDED IN PROPORTION TO ENROLLMENT GROWTH
- 53. FIRST ROUND MP OPTIONS COMPREHENSIVE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY
- 55. REVISED MP OPTIONS COMPREHENSIVE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY
- 56. OPTION 1 OPTION 1 OPTION 2
- 57. PROPOSED MASTER PLAN COMPREHENSIVE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY
- 58. Guide campus development over the next ten years PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
- 59. Guide campus development over the next ten years PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
- 60. Develop an east/west Campus Walk, a safe and attractive pedestrian thoroughfare across campus PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
- 61. Expand the distinct landscaping of the Oval to unify the campus PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
- 62. Organize new construction around pedestrian oriented green space PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
- 63. Renovate older buildings around the Oval PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
- 64. Enhance campus edges and gateways to project a positive image PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
- 65. Provide additional space near the west end of campus to relieve off-campus parking congestion and accommodate future growth in the campus housing PROPOSED MASTER PLAN system.
- 76. NEXT STEPS . . . • IMPLEMENTATION PHASE • PRIORITIES • FUNDING • POLICY IMPLICATIONS • FINAL REVIEWS • ADOPTION
- 77. .QUESTIONS?