SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 5
Baixar para ler offline
Republic of the Philippines
                                                     Supreme Court
                                                           Manila
FROM THE DESK OF:


          A         J
             TTY. OSE      M
                           IDAS . PM  ARQUEZ
       CHIEF OF STAFF, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE
           CHIEF, PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE
            ASSISTANT COURT ADMINISTRATOR
                                                                         12 March 2009

           MR. PIPALAWAN O. NAGA
           Technical Director
           Save Lake Lanao Movement (SALLAM)
           12-B 6th Street, MSU Main Campus
           Marawi City 9700 PHILIPPINES

           Dear MR. NAGA:

                   The Supreme Court is spearheading a Forum on Environmental Justice: Upholding the Right
           to a Balanced and Healthful Ecology on 16 – 17 April 2009, to be held simultaneously in three sites
           nationwide through videoconferencing—University of the Cordilleras (Baguio City), University
           of the Philippines Visayas (Iloilo City), and Ateneo de Davao University (Davao City). The
           main site of the forum is Baguio City because the vigorous and continuing debates on Baguio’s
           environmental issues make it an especially apt venue for the forum. The forum will be an ideal
           activity as a run-up to Earth Day on 22 April 2009.

                   This forum completes the circle of rights initiatives of the Supreme Court which began in
           July 2007 with the conduct of the National Consultative Summit on Extrajudicial Killings and
           Enforced Disappearances. That same year, the Supreme Court promulgated the Rules on the Writ
           of Amparo and the Writ of Habeas Data which are both aimed at protecting the first generation
           rights in the form of individual and civil rights. The following year, the Supreme Court
           conducted the Forum on Increasing Access to Justice for the Poor which focused on the second
           generation of human rights and resulted, among others, the formulation of the Rule of Procedure
           for Small Claims Cases, and the Enhanced Justice on Wheels Program (EJOW), and the Rule on
           Mandatory Legal Aid Service for Practicing Lawyers among others.

                  In this regard, on behalf of the Supreme Court, may we invite you to attend the two-day
           forum at the Ateneo de Davao University, 8016 Roxas Avenue, Davao City?

                  We are sending herewith the Forum Program and Guide for your information and
           perusal. May we also request you to accomplish the attached registration form and fax to (02)
           552-9628.

                   There will be no registration fees. Transportation costs, meals and hotel accommodation
           will be provided during the forum.

                        We look forward to seeing you in April.

                                                                  Very truly yours,


                                                            JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZ
Supreme Court of the Philippines
                                                       Manila

                      Forum on Environmental Justice:
             Upholding the Right to a Balanced & Healthful Ecology
                      16 – 17 April 2009 (Thursday to Friday)

                          University of the Cordilleras, Baguio City
                        University of the Philippines Visayas, Iloilo City
                           Ateneo de Davao University, Davao City


                                          FORUM GUIDE
A. BACKGROUND

          The Rule of Law and the Environment. On August 2002, in the Global Judges Symposium on
Sustainable Development held in Johannesburg, South Africa, the Johannesburg Principles were drafted by the
attending representatives of the judiciaries all over the world holding that “an independent judiciary and judicial
process is vital for the implementation, development and enforcement of environmental law….” It further
emphasized that “the fragile state of the global environment requires the Judiciary, as the guardian of the Rule of
Law, to boldly and fearlessly, implement and enforce applicable international and national laws, which, in the
field of environment and sustainable development will assist in alleviating poverty and sustaining an enduring
civilization, and ensuring that the present generation will enjoy and improve the quality of life of all peoples, while
also ensuring that the inherent rights and interests of succeeding generations are not compromised.”
Environmental degradation and climate change increasingly receive international coverage within the context of
human rights issues. Recognition of the link between the abuse of the human rights of various vulnerable
communities and related damage to their environment is expressed under the term environmental justice. In both
the industrialised and developing parts of the world, a growing body of evidence demonstrates that poor and other
disenfranchised groups have been the greatest victims of environmental degradation.

        Environmental Justice. The concept of environmental justice embraces two objectives. The first is to
ensure that rights and responsibilities regarding the utilisation of environmental resources are distributed with
greater fairness among communities, both globally and domestically. This entails ensuring that poor and
marginalised communities do not suffer a disproportionate burden of the costs associated with the development
of resources, while not enjoying equivalent benefits from their utilisation. The second is to reduce the overall
amount of environmental damage domestically and globally.

         The Right to a Healthy Environment. Section 16 of Article II of the 1987 Constitution, provides
that: “The State shall protect and advance the right of the people to a balanced and healthful ecology in accord
with the rhythm and harmony of nature.” In Section 15 of the same Article, it is provided that: “The State shall
protect and promote the right to health of the people and instill health consciousness among them.” The right to a
healthy environment requires a healthy human habitat, including clean water, air, and soil that are free from
toxins or hazards that threaten human health. The right to a healthy environment entails the obligation of
governments to refrain from interfering directly or indirectly with the enjoyment of the right to a healthy
environment; prevent third parties such as corporations from interfering in any way with the enjoyment of the
right to a healthy environment; and adopt the necessary measures to achieve the full realisation of the right to a
healthy environment.

         Within the Judiciary, the Supreme Court has, for several years, now been implementing a comprehensive
judicial reform program, which focuses on the development of systems, institutions, and resources. On the issue of
environmental justice in particular, the Supreme Court has taken steps to address delays in the resolution of
environment cases, lack of information, stringent requirements in litigation, lack of environmental (“green”)
courts and other barriers to environmental justice. While these measures are continuing, there is a need to assess
their impact, consolidate gains, further enhance their effectiveness, identify and obviate constraints, and to launch
innovative initiatives, through the Court’s singular rule-making power under the Constitution concerning the
protection and enforcement of constitutional rights, pleading, practice, and procedure on all courts, the admission
to the practice of law, the Integrated Bar, and legal assistance to the underprivileged. [Art. VIII, § 5 (5)]
On 28 January 2008, the Court issued SC Administrative Circular No. 23-2008, designating 117
environmental (“green”) courts. The designation of environmental courts is just one of the many steps in helping
affected communities that have suffered adverse conditions resulting from environmental law violations.
Currently, some judges may not be ready to try cases that involve technical procedures or terms; lack awareness
on existing environmental laws; or fail to realize that a speedy trial is crucial, given that a number of
environmental cases concern survival of species. With these scenarios in mind, there are succeeding steps that
need to be undertaken to strengthen the courts and make them effective, foremost of which, is the capability
training for judges handling the environmental courts. Another step would be the greening not only of the benches
but also the other pillars of justice, namely the prosecution, enforcement, community, and penology. A multi-
sectoral framework would be crucial because no environmental court will function fairly if one pillar is prejudiced
against the other. The other pillars would also necessitate awareness trainings to fully understand the
requirements of environmental justice.

         After 2007’s national consultative summit seeking solutions to the problem of extralegal killings and
enforced disappearances that constitute a violation of our people’s civil and political rights, and 2008’s forum on
increasing access to justice by the poor and marginalized groups, the Court now focuses its attention to what has
been termed as “third generation” rights, particularly, environmental rights. The Forum will enable the Court to
receive inputs directly from the different stakeholders in the justice system, particularly the sectors that are most
vulnerable. The outputs from the Forum will also enable the Court and other allied pillars of justice to better fulfill
their constitutional mandate in promoting, protecting and upholding the right to a balanced and healthful
ecology.

B. FORUM OBJECTIVES

    1.    To validate the draft Rule of Procedure for Environmental Cases;

    2. To discuss the need for a mechanism/structure that will address the need to monitor environmental cases
       or issues and monitor compliance thereat; and

    3. To identify best practices of some agencies/units and replicate in a particular situation.

C. PARTICIPANTS AND OBSERVERS

    A estimated total of 560 participants and observers from the Judiciary, Executive and Legislative branch,
    Non-Governmental Organizations, Peoples’ Organization, the Academe, Development Partners, and
    Diplomatic Corps will be invited. The participants will then be distributed to each of the break-out groups to
    best represent the following sectors:

     1.    Forestry                                        5. Solid Waste
     2.    Water                                           6. Toxic Substances
     3.    Marine                                          7. Energy
     4.    Air

D. WORKING LANGUAGE

    The working languages of the Forum are English and Filipino. Forum documents are available in English
    only.

E. FORUM PROPER

    The Forum will be held for two days, from 16 – 17 April 2009, simultaneously in three sites — University of
    Cordilleras in Baguio City, University of the Philippines Visayas in Iloilo City, and Ateneo de Davao University
    in Davao City, which shall all be linked through video conferencing.

    Day 1: 16 April 2009

    During the morning session, heads of government agencies will deliver a short message on how the courts
    can help in the protection and preservation of the environment and their agencies’
    commitment on environmental justice. These messages will thereafter be followed by a short
    response from representatives of civil society.

    The culminating activity before lunch break will be a signing of Memorandum of Commitment on
    Environmental Justice by the different heads of government agencies, representatives of civil society, and
    the Judiciary.

    After lunch, participants will break out into their pre-determined groups to share their respective experiences
    and surface issues concerning environmental justice relating not only to the Court, but also regarding
    implementation, enforcement, legislation, monitoring, etc…The objectives of this group-sharing are: (1) to
    identify legal and non-legal issues on environmental justice in the participants’ respective areas of concern;
    (2) to identify gaps existing in substantive laws and rules concerning environmental justice; and (3) to identify


                                                          2
best practices in attaining environmental justice of some groups despite the absence or inadequacies of
     substantive laws and rules or the unresponsiveness of government agencies/prosecutors/other authorities.

     Each group will be assisted by a facilitator and a documentor. A synthesis of the groups discussion will be
     presented by region (Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao) on the 2nd day of the Forum.

     Day 1 of the forum will be concluded with a presentation on the proposed Rule of Procedure for
     Environmental Cases.

     Day 2: 17 April 2009

     On Day 2, a synthesis of the group discussions of Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao shall be presented during the
     plenary session. This will be followed by a workshop where participants will be requested to comment and
     share their insights on the proposed Rule of Procedure for Environmental Cases.

     The highlight of the afternoon session of Day 2 will be a presentation by each group of their respective reports
     and recommendations on the proposed Rule. The Court may adopt or refer to the necessary body for
     appropriate action the recommendations from the Forum.

D. SPEAKERS

     All speakers are encouraged to prepare and submit a paper of any length with annexes if needed, detailing the
     significant inputs of their respective agencies / sectors. However, because of time constraints, each speaker is
     only allotted a maximum of 10 minutes to make their respective presentations. The moderator will remind
     the speakers of their remaining time. With permission from the speaker, his/her paper will be printed and
     distributed to the participants by the forum secretariat. It will also be uploaded in the Supreme Court of the
     Philippines website (http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph).

     The speakers are requested to provide the secretariat with electronic copies of their respective papers together
     with their one-page profile with photo (jpeg format) on or before 16 March 2009 (Friday) through email at:

                                               ejforum@gmail.com.

     The hard copies of the papers and one-page personal profiles of the speakers may likewise be received at the
     Public Information Office (PIO) of the Supreme Court, 3/F Annex Building, Supreme Court of the Philippines,
     Padre Faura Street, Manila.

     A computer and printer will be made available at a designated room where speakers may edit their
     presentation or rehearse should they wish to. During the forum proper, an LCD projector with screen and a
     computer operator will also be available. Should the speakers have any other requirements, please feel free to
     coordinate with the contact person listed below on or before 16 March 2009 (Friday).

H. REGISTRATION

     Registration is required for all participants.

     Pre-registration can be done by sending the completed registration form through email at
     ejforum@gmail.com or fax to the following numbers:

           1.   Speakers, Government Agencies, Local Government Units (LGUs), and Media c/o Public
                Information Office at Tel. No. +632 526 8129

           2. Development Partners, Diplomatic Corps, Judges, NGOs/POs c/o the Philippine Judicial Academy
              at Tel. No. +632 552 9628

     On-site registration will commence on 15 April 2009 (Wednesday), beginning at 2 p.m. until 4 p.m. at the
     respective hotel lobbies. Registration on 16 April 2009 (Thursday) will commence from 08:00 to 08:30 a.m.
     at the University of Cordilleras, Baguio City, University of the Philippines Visayas, Iloilo City, and Ateneo de
     Davao University, Davao City. Participants who have pre-registered will be given their respective IDs, while
     those who have not yet pre-registered are requested to secure their IDs from the Forum Secretariat. Kits will
     be given at the registration counter upon presentation of the ID.

     All participants must wear their IDs for the duration of the forum.

I.   MEALS and HOTEL ACCOMMODATION

     The following hotel accommodations are provided for participants coming from the regions/provinces outside
     of Baguio City, Iloilo City and Davao City from 15 April to 18 April 2009:

     •   Luzon participants, except those residing in Baguio City, shall be given hotel accommodation at
         the Hotel Veniz, Baguio City.


                                                          3
•   Visayas participants, except those residing in Iloilo City, shall be given hotel accommodation at
      the Amigo Hotel, Iloilo City.

  •   Mindanao participants, except those residing in Davao City, shall be given hotel accommodation
      at the Royal Mandaya Hotel, Davao City.

  Check-in time is 2:00 p.m. of 15 April and the latest check-out time is at 12:00 noon of 18 April. Participants
  arriving earlier than the designated check-in time on 15 April or those who wish to depart beyond 18 April will
  shoulder the additional costs of accommodation.

  The organizers have reserved rooms on sharing arrangements with breakfast. Participants are requested to
  observe room assignments strictly. The organizers cannot guarantee room preference. Accompanying
  persons not invited to attend the forum will have to shoulder the costs of their own accommodation.

  Use of mini bar and outgoing calls from the hotel rooms are not allowed. However, should the participants
  wish to avail of these and other hotel services, they may do so at their own personal expense.

  Meal arrangement at the hotel accommodations will be provided as follows:

      •   15 April, Wednesday:       Dinner
      •   16 April, Thursday: Breakfast and Dinner
      •   17 April, Friday:          Breakfast and Dinner
      •   18 April, Saturday: Breakfast

  Lunch and Snacks during the Forum will be provided at the respective venues.

J. REIMBURSEMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EXPENSES (for NGOs and Pos, and Judges ONLY)

  Participants coming from the regions/provinces outside of Baguio City, Iloilo City and Davao City may
  reimburse their transportation expenses upon furnishing the Finance Group the following documents:

      •   Completed Itinerary of Travel; and
      •   Original transportation tickets such as but not limited to plane fare tickets with boarding pass, bus
          and boat tickets.

  The reimbursement process will be done based on the following schedule and venue:

      •   15 April, 2-4 PM, Hotel:                     Submission of requirements
      •   16 April, 8 AM -12 NN, Forum Venue:          Submission of requirements
      •   16 April, 1 PM – 4 PM, Forum Venue:          Release of reimbursements
      •   17 April, 8 AM - 4 PM, Forum Venue:          Release of reimbursements

  Participants are encouraged to take the most economical means of transportation to the venue. Only direct
  transportation expenses will be reimbursed. The reimbursement process shall be done in accordance
  with existing government accounting and auditing rules and regulations.

K. SEATING ARRANGEMENTS OF PARTICIPANTS

  Participants are requested to be guided by the signage in finding their respective seats. Ushers and usherettes
  will also be posted before the start of the sessions to assist the participants in finding their seats.

L. FORUM SECRETARIAT

  Should you have any concerns during the forum, please feel free to approach any of the Secretariat team
  members who can be identified through their respective I.D.s.

  Should you have other questions and request for additional information please refer them to any of the
  following:

      The Forum Secretariat: ejforum@gmail.com

      Armida M. Salazar
      Charmaine C. Saltivan
      (02) 552.95.23 to 24

      Abigail T. Sze
      (02) 522.50.94
      0928.500.98.72




                                                      4

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

International Environmental Law
International Environmental LawInternational Environmental Law
International Environmental Lawana maria gaviria
 
Chapt14 Lecture
Chapt14 LectureChapt14 Lecture
Chapt14 Lecturerpieper
 
DR. H. ABDUL AZEEZ ON BIODIVERSITY & HUMAN RIGHTS
DR. H. ABDUL AZEEZ ON BIODIVERSITY & HUMAN RIGHTS DR. H. ABDUL AZEEZ ON BIODIVERSITY & HUMAN RIGHTS
DR. H. ABDUL AZEEZ ON BIODIVERSITY & HUMAN RIGHTS Abdul Azeez H
 
The trail smelter case
The trail smelter caseThe trail smelter case
The trail smelter caseKeshavPriya1
 
Itzchak e. kornfeld, adios to paradise the yacyreta dam and the destruction o...
Itzchak e. kornfeld, adios to paradise the yacyreta dam and the destruction o...Itzchak e. kornfeld, adios to paradise the yacyreta dam and the destruction o...
Itzchak e. kornfeld, adios to paradise the yacyreta dam and the destruction o...Itzchak Kornfeld, Ph.D.
 
236389524 cruz-secretary-of-environment
236389524 cruz-secretary-of-environment236389524 cruz-secretary-of-environment
236389524 cruz-secretary-of-environmenthomeworkping3
 
Report of the final conference on 5 march 2009
Report of the final conference on 5 march 2009Report of the final conference on 5 march 2009
Report of the final conference on 5 march 2009Dr Lendy Spires
 

Mais procurados (9)

International Environmental Law
International Environmental LawInternational Environmental Law
International Environmental Law
 
Chapt24 lecture
Chapt24 lectureChapt24 lecture
Chapt24 lecture
 
Chapt14 Lecture
Chapt14 LectureChapt14 Lecture
Chapt14 Lecture
 
DR. H. ABDUL AZEEZ ON BIODIVERSITY & HUMAN RIGHTS
DR. H. ABDUL AZEEZ ON BIODIVERSITY & HUMAN RIGHTS DR. H. ABDUL AZEEZ ON BIODIVERSITY & HUMAN RIGHTS
DR. H. ABDUL AZEEZ ON BIODIVERSITY & HUMAN RIGHTS
 
The trail smelter case
The trail smelter caseThe trail smelter case
The trail smelter case
 
Itzchak e. kornfeld, adios to paradise the yacyreta dam and the destruction o...
Itzchak e. kornfeld, adios to paradise the yacyreta dam and the destruction o...Itzchak e. kornfeld, adios to paradise the yacyreta dam and the destruction o...
Itzchak e. kornfeld, adios to paradise the yacyreta dam and the destruction o...
 
236389524 cruz-secretary-of-environment
236389524 cruz-secretary-of-environment236389524 cruz-secretary-of-environment
236389524 cruz-secretary-of-environment
 
SD Timeline
SD TimelineSD Timeline
SD Timeline
 
Report of the final conference on 5 march 2009
Report of the final conference on 5 march 2009Report of the final conference on 5 march 2009
Report of the final conference on 5 march 2009
 

Destaque

Lake lanao 13th wlc paper acceptance
Lake lanao   13th wlc paper acceptanceLake lanao   13th wlc paper acceptance
Lake lanao 13th wlc paper acceptancePip Naga
 
Lake lanao 13th wlc
Lake lanao   13th wlcLake lanao   13th wlc
Lake lanao 13th wlcPip Naga
 
Lake lanao asian lake basins conference
Lake lanao   asian lake basins conferenceLake lanao   asian lake basins conference
Lake lanao asian lake basins conferencePip Naga
 
Lake lanao ateneo sesquicentennial
Lake lanao   ateneo sesquicentennialLake lanao   ateneo sesquicentennial
Lake lanao ateneo sesquicentennialPip Naga
 
Lake lanao ateneo sose and sc johnson forum
Lake lanao   ateneo sose and sc johnson forumLake lanao   ateneo sose and sc johnson forum
Lake lanao ateneo sose and sc johnson forumPip Naga
 
The case of lake lanao 16042010
The case of lake lanao 16042010The case of lake lanao 16042010
The case of lake lanao 16042010Pip Naga
 
Lake lanao an ancient lake in distress
Lake lanao   an ancient lake in distressLake lanao   an ancient lake in distress
Lake lanao an ancient lake in distressPip Naga
 
Lake lanao climate change and biodiversity conservation
Lake lanao   climate change and biodiversity conservationLake lanao   climate change and biodiversity conservation
Lake lanao climate change and biodiversity conservationPip Naga
 
Lake lanao an ancient lake in distress
Lake lanao   an ancient lake in distressLake lanao   an ancient lake in distress
Lake lanao an ancient lake in distressPip Naga
 

Destaque (9)

Lake lanao 13th wlc paper acceptance
Lake lanao   13th wlc paper acceptanceLake lanao   13th wlc paper acceptance
Lake lanao 13th wlc paper acceptance
 
Lake lanao 13th wlc
Lake lanao   13th wlcLake lanao   13th wlc
Lake lanao 13th wlc
 
Lake lanao asian lake basins conference
Lake lanao   asian lake basins conferenceLake lanao   asian lake basins conference
Lake lanao asian lake basins conference
 
Lake lanao ateneo sesquicentennial
Lake lanao   ateneo sesquicentennialLake lanao   ateneo sesquicentennial
Lake lanao ateneo sesquicentennial
 
Lake lanao ateneo sose and sc johnson forum
Lake lanao   ateneo sose and sc johnson forumLake lanao   ateneo sose and sc johnson forum
Lake lanao ateneo sose and sc johnson forum
 
The case of lake lanao 16042010
The case of lake lanao 16042010The case of lake lanao 16042010
The case of lake lanao 16042010
 
Lake lanao an ancient lake in distress
Lake lanao   an ancient lake in distressLake lanao   an ancient lake in distress
Lake lanao an ancient lake in distress
 
Lake lanao climate change and biodiversity conservation
Lake lanao   climate change and biodiversity conservationLake lanao   climate change and biodiversity conservation
Lake lanao climate change and biodiversity conservation
 
Lake lanao an ancient lake in distress
Lake lanao   an ancient lake in distressLake lanao   an ancient lake in distress
Lake lanao an ancient lake in distress
 

Semelhante a Forum on environmental justice

Understanding Environmental Justice
Understanding Environmental JusticeUnderstanding Environmental Justice
Understanding Environmental JusticePreeti Sikder
 
Introduction Indonesian Environmental Law
Introduction Indonesian Environmental LawIntroduction Indonesian Environmental Law
Introduction Indonesian Environmental LawWahyu Yuns
 
Role of judiciary in environment cases
Role of judiciary in environment casesRole of judiciary in environment cases
Role of judiciary in environment casesUNEP OzonAction
 
The Human Rights to Water and Sanitation in Courts Worldwide: A Selection of ...
The Human Rights to Water and Sanitation in Courts Worldwide: A Selection of ...The Human Rights to Water and Sanitation in Courts Worldwide: A Selection of ...
The Human Rights to Water and Sanitation in Courts Worldwide: A Selection of ...Graciela Mariani
 
Constitutional perspectives on_environment[1]
Constitutional perspectives on_environment[1]Constitutional perspectives on_environment[1]
Constitutional perspectives on_environment[1]sujaya_mba10
 
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, EQUITY & RACISM
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, EQUITY & RACISMENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, EQUITY & RACISM
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, EQUITY & RACISMkoketso Kanekane
 
Bullard_Environmental-Justice-in-the-21st-Century.pdf
Bullard_Environmental-Justice-in-the-21st-Century.pdfBullard_Environmental-Justice-in-the-21st-Century.pdf
Bullard_Environmental-Justice-in-the-21st-Century.pdfPortiaAwuah
 
Justiciability of the Right to Access to Water in Cameroon
Justiciability of the Right to Access to Water in CameroonJusticiability of the Right to Access to Water in Cameroon
Justiciability of the Right to Access to Water in Cameroonijtsrd
 
Sustainable development brundtland report, ppp, equity
Sustainable development  brundtland report, ppp, equitySustainable development  brundtland report, ppp, equity
Sustainable development brundtland report, ppp, equityMegha Majoe
 
Business Law Dec 2022.docx
Business Law Dec 2022.docxBusiness Law Dec 2022.docx
Business Law Dec 2022.docxkanuchauhan7
 
PPT Verdict against the Big Six Agrochemical Companies: Syngenta, Bayer, Mons...
PPT Verdict against the Big Six Agrochemical Companies: Syngenta, Bayer, Mons...PPT Verdict against the Big Six Agrochemical Companies: Syngenta, Bayer, Mons...
PPT Verdict against the Big Six Agrochemical Companies: Syngenta, Bayer, Mons...Save Dolphins
 
Environmental justice
Environmental justiceEnvironmental justice
Environmental justiceGerielQuides
 
Implementation of Environmental Justice: Through Dispute Settlement
Implementation of Environmental Justice: Through Dispute SettlementImplementation of Environmental Justice: Through Dispute Settlement
Implementation of Environmental Justice: Through Dispute SettlementPreeti Sikder
 
John knox report hre 2018
John knox report hre 2018John knox report hre 2018
John knox report hre 2018Wahyu Yuns
 
CCW Conference Environment Justice
CCW Conference Environment JusticeCCW Conference Environment Justice
CCW Conference Environment JusticeClean Water
 

Semelhante a Forum on environmental justice (20)

Understanding Environmental Justice
Understanding Environmental JusticeUnderstanding Environmental Justice
Understanding Environmental Justice
 
Indu mehta pil
Indu mehta pilIndu mehta pil
Indu mehta pil
 
Introduction Indonesian Environmental Law
Introduction Indonesian Environmental LawIntroduction Indonesian Environmental Law
Introduction Indonesian Environmental Law
 
Role of judiciary in environment cases
Role of judiciary in environment casesRole of judiciary in environment cases
Role of judiciary in environment cases
 
The Human Rights to Water and Sanitation in Courts Worldwide: A Selection of ...
The Human Rights to Water and Sanitation in Courts Worldwide: A Selection of ...The Human Rights to Water and Sanitation in Courts Worldwide: A Selection of ...
The Human Rights to Water and Sanitation in Courts Worldwide: A Selection of ...
 
Constitutional perspectives on_environment[1]
Constitutional perspectives on_environment[1]Constitutional perspectives on_environment[1]
Constitutional perspectives on_environment[1]
 
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, EQUITY & RACISM
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, EQUITY & RACISMENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, EQUITY & RACISM
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, EQUITY & RACISM
 
Bullard_Environmental-Justice-in-the-21st-Century.pdf
Bullard_Environmental-Justice-in-the-21st-Century.pdfBullard_Environmental-Justice-in-the-21st-Century.pdf
Bullard_Environmental-Justice-in-the-21st-Century.pdf
 
Justiciability of the Right to Access to Water in Cameroon
Justiciability of the Right to Access to Water in CameroonJusticiability of the Right to Access to Water in Cameroon
Justiciability of the Right to Access to Water in Cameroon
 
C322732
C322732C322732
C322732
 
CESCR State Report
CESCR State ReportCESCR State Report
CESCR State Report
 
Phsci talk updated
Phsci talk updatedPhsci talk updated
Phsci talk updated
 
Phsci talk updated
Phsci talk updatedPhsci talk updated
Phsci talk updated
 
Sustainable development brundtland report, ppp, equity
Sustainable development  brundtland report, ppp, equitySustainable development  brundtland report, ppp, equity
Sustainable development brundtland report, ppp, equity
 
Business Law Dec 2022.docx
Business Law Dec 2022.docxBusiness Law Dec 2022.docx
Business Law Dec 2022.docx
 
PPT Verdict against the Big Six Agrochemical Companies: Syngenta, Bayer, Mons...
PPT Verdict against the Big Six Agrochemical Companies: Syngenta, Bayer, Mons...PPT Verdict against the Big Six Agrochemical Companies: Syngenta, Bayer, Mons...
PPT Verdict against the Big Six Agrochemical Companies: Syngenta, Bayer, Mons...
 
Environmental justice
Environmental justiceEnvironmental justice
Environmental justice
 
Implementation of Environmental Justice: Through Dispute Settlement
Implementation of Environmental Justice: Through Dispute SettlementImplementation of Environmental Justice: Through Dispute Settlement
Implementation of Environmental Justice: Through Dispute Settlement
 
John knox report hre 2018
John knox report hre 2018John knox report hre 2018
John knox report hre 2018
 
CCW Conference Environment Justice
CCW Conference Environment JusticeCCW Conference Environment Justice
CCW Conference Environment Justice
 

Forum on environmental justice

  • 1. Republic of the Philippines Supreme Court Manila FROM THE DESK OF: A J TTY. OSE M IDAS . PM ARQUEZ CHIEF OF STAFF, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF, PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE ASSISTANT COURT ADMINISTRATOR 12 March 2009 MR. PIPALAWAN O. NAGA Technical Director Save Lake Lanao Movement (SALLAM) 12-B 6th Street, MSU Main Campus Marawi City 9700 PHILIPPINES Dear MR. NAGA: The Supreme Court is spearheading a Forum on Environmental Justice: Upholding the Right to a Balanced and Healthful Ecology on 16 – 17 April 2009, to be held simultaneously in three sites nationwide through videoconferencing—University of the Cordilleras (Baguio City), University of the Philippines Visayas (Iloilo City), and Ateneo de Davao University (Davao City). The main site of the forum is Baguio City because the vigorous and continuing debates on Baguio’s environmental issues make it an especially apt venue for the forum. The forum will be an ideal activity as a run-up to Earth Day on 22 April 2009. This forum completes the circle of rights initiatives of the Supreme Court which began in July 2007 with the conduct of the National Consultative Summit on Extrajudicial Killings and Enforced Disappearances. That same year, the Supreme Court promulgated the Rules on the Writ of Amparo and the Writ of Habeas Data which are both aimed at protecting the first generation rights in the form of individual and civil rights. The following year, the Supreme Court conducted the Forum on Increasing Access to Justice for the Poor which focused on the second generation of human rights and resulted, among others, the formulation of the Rule of Procedure for Small Claims Cases, and the Enhanced Justice on Wheels Program (EJOW), and the Rule on Mandatory Legal Aid Service for Practicing Lawyers among others. In this regard, on behalf of the Supreme Court, may we invite you to attend the two-day forum at the Ateneo de Davao University, 8016 Roxas Avenue, Davao City? We are sending herewith the Forum Program and Guide for your information and perusal. May we also request you to accomplish the attached registration form and fax to (02) 552-9628. There will be no registration fees. Transportation costs, meals and hotel accommodation will be provided during the forum. We look forward to seeing you in April. Very truly yours, JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZ
  • 2. Supreme Court of the Philippines Manila Forum on Environmental Justice: Upholding the Right to a Balanced & Healthful Ecology 16 – 17 April 2009 (Thursday to Friday) University of the Cordilleras, Baguio City University of the Philippines Visayas, Iloilo City Ateneo de Davao University, Davao City FORUM GUIDE A. BACKGROUND The Rule of Law and the Environment. On August 2002, in the Global Judges Symposium on Sustainable Development held in Johannesburg, South Africa, the Johannesburg Principles were drafted by the attending representatives of the judiciaries all over the world holding that “an independent judiciary and judicial process is vital for the implementation, development and enforcement of environmental law….” It further emphasized that “the fragile state of the global environment requires the Judiciary, as the guardian of the Rule of Law, to boldly and fearlessly, implement and enforce applicable international and national laws, which, in the field of environment and sustainable development will assist in alleviating poverty and sustaining an enduring civilization, and ensuring that the present generation will enjoy and improve the quality of life of all peoples, while also ensuring that the inherent rights and interests of succeeding generations are not compromised.” Environmental degradation and climate change increasingly receive international coverage within the context of human rights issues. Recognition of the link between the abuse of the human rights of various vulnerable communities and related damage to their environment is expressed under the term environmental justice. In both the industrialised and developing parts of the world, a growing body of evidence demonstrates that poor and other disenfranchised groups have been the greatest victims of environmental degradation. Environmental Justice. The concept of environmental justice embraces two objectives. The first is to ensure that rights and responsibilities regarding the utilisation of environmental resources are distributed with greater fairness among communities, both globally and domestically. This entails ensuring that poor and marginalised communities do not suffer a disproportionate burden of the costs associated with the development of resources, while not enjoying equivalent benefits from their utilisation. The second is to reduce the overall amount of environmental damage domestically and globally. The Right to a Healthy Environment. Section 16 of Article II of the 1987 Constitution, provides that: “The State shall protect and advance the right of the people to a balanced and healthful ecology in accord with the rhythm and harmony of nature.” In Section 15 of the same Article, it is provided that: “The State shall protect and promote the right to health of the people and instill health consciousness among them.” The right to a healthy environment requires a healthy human habitat, including clean water, air, and soil that are free from toxins or hazards that threaten human health. The right to a healthy environment entails the obligation of governments to refrain from interfering directly or indirectly with the enjoyment of the right to a healthy environment; prevent third parties such as corporations from interfering in any way with the enjoyment of the right to a healthy environment; and adopt the necessary measures to achieve the full realisation of the right to a healthy environment. Within the Judiciary, the Supreme Court has, for several years, now been implementing a comprehensive judicial reform program, which focuses on the development of systems, institutions, and resources. On the issue of environmental justice in particular, the Supreme Court has taken steps to address delays in the resolution of environment cases, lack of information, stringent requirements in litigation, lack of environmental (“green”) courts and other barriers to environmental justice. While these measures are continuing, there is a need to assess their impact, consolidate gains, further enhance their effectiveness, identify and obviate constraints, and to launch innovative initiatives, through the Court’s singular rule-making power under the Constitution concerning the protection and enforcement of constitutional rights, pleading, practice, and procedure on all courts, the admission to the practice of law, the Integrated Bar, and legal assistance to the underprivileged. [Art. VIII, § 5 (5)]
  • 3. On 28 January 2008, the Court issued SC Administrative Circular No. 23-2008, designating 117 environmental (“green”) courts. The designation of environmental courts is just one of the many steps in helping affected communities that have suffered adverse conditions resulting from environmental law violations. Currently, some judges may not be ready to try cases that involve technical procedures or terms; lack awareness on existing environmental laws; or fail to realize that a speedy trial is crucial, given that a number of environmental cases concern survival of species. With these scenarios in mind, there are succeeding steps that need to be undertaken to strengthen the courts and make them effective, foremost of which, is the capability training for judges handling the environmental courts. Another step would be the greening not only of the benches but also the other pillars of justice, namely the prosecution, enforcement, community, and penology. A multi- sectoral framework would be crucial because no environmental court will function fairly if one pillar is prejudiced against the other. The other pillars would also necessitate awareness trainings to fully understand the requirements of environmental justice. After 2007’s national consultative summit seeking solutions to the problem of extralegal killings and enforced disappearances that constitute a violation of our people’s civil and political rights, and 2008’s forum on increasing access to justice by the poor and marginalized groups, the Court now focuses its attention to what has been termed as “third generation” rights, particularly, environmental rights. The Forum will enable the Court to receive inputs directly from the different stakeholders in the justice system, particularly the sectors that are most vulnerable. The outputs from the Forum will also enable the Court and other allied pillars of justice to better fulfill their constitutional mandate in promoting, protecting and upholding the right to a balanced and healthful ecology. B. FORUM OBJECTIVES 1. To validate the draft Rule of Procedure for Environmental Cases; 2. To discuss the need for a mechanism/structure that will address the need to monitor environmental cases or issues and monitor compliance thereat; and 3. To identify best practices of some agencies/units and replicate in a particular situation. C. PARTICIPANTS AND OBSERVERS A estimated total of 560 participants and observers from the Judiciary, Executive and Legislative branch, Non-Governmental Organizations, Peoples’ Organization, the Academe, Development Partners, and Diplomatic Corps will be invited. The participants will then be distributed to each of the break-out groups to best represent the following sectors: 1. Forestry 5. Solid Waste 2. Water 6. Toxic Substances 3. Marine 7. Energy 4. Air D. WORKING LANGUAGE The working languages of the Forum are English and Filipino. Forum documents are available in English only. E. FORUM PROPER The Forum will be held for two days, from 16 – 17 April 2009, simultaneously in three sites — University of Cordilleras in Baguio City, University of the Philippines Visayas in Iloilo City, and Ateneo de Davao University in Davao City, which shall all be linked through video conferencing. Day 1: 16 April 2009 During the morning session, heads of government agencies will deliver a short message on how the courts can help in the protection and preservation of the environment and their agencies’ commitment on environmental justice. These messages will thereafter be followed by a short response from representatives of civil society. The culminating activity before lunch break will be a signing of Memorandum of Commitment on Environmental Justice by the different heads of government agencies, representatives of civil society, and the Judiciary. After lunch, participants will break out into their pre-determined groups to share their respective experiences and surface issues concerning environmental justice relating not only to the Court, but also regarding implementation, enforcement, legislation, monitoring, etc…The objectives of this group-sharing are: (1) to identify legal and non-legal issues on environmental justice in the participants’ respective areas of concern; (2) to identify gaps existing in substantive laws and rules concerning environmental justice; and (3) to identify 2
  • 4. best practices in attaining environmental justice of some groups despite the absence or inadequacies of substantive laws and rules or the unresponsiveness of government agencies/prosecutors/other authorities. Each group will be assisted by a facilitator and a documentor. A synthesis of the groups discussion will be presented by region (Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao) on the 2nd day of the Forum. Day 1 of the forum will be concluded with a presentation on the proposed Rule of Procedure for Environmental Cases. Day 2: 17 April 2009 On Day 2, a synthesis of the group discussions of Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao shall be presented during the plenary session. This will be followed by a workshop where participants will be requested to comment and share their insights on the proposed Rule of Procedure for Environmental Cases. The highlight of the afternoon session of Day 2 will be a presentation by each group of their respective reports and recommendations on the proposed Rule. The Court may adopt or refer to the necessary body for appropriate action the recommendations from the Forum. D. SPEAKERS All speakers are encouraged to prepare and submit a paper of any length with annexes if needed, detailing the significant inputs of their respective agencies / sectors. However, because of time constraints, each speaker is only allotted a maximum of 10 minutes to make their respective presentations. The moderator will remind the speakers of their remaining time. With permission from the speaker, his/her paper will be printed and distributed to the participants by the forum secretariat. It will also be uploaded in the Supreme Court of the Philippines website (http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph). The speakers are requested to provide the secretariat with electronic copies of their respective papers together with their one-page profile with photo (jpeg format) on or before 16 March 2009 (Friday) through email at: ejforum@gmail.com. The hard copies of the papers and one-page personal profiles of the speakers may likewise be received at the Public Information Office (PIO) of the Supreme Court, 3/F Annex Building, Supreme Court of the Philippines, Padre Faura Street, Manila. A computer and printer will be made available at a designated room where speakers may edit their presentation or rehearse should they wish to. During the forum proper, an LCD projector with screen and a computer operator will also be available. Should the speakers have any other requirements, please feel free to coordinate with the contact person listed below on or before 16 March 2009 (Friday). H. REGISTRATION Registration is required for all participants. Pre-registration can be done by sending the completed registration form through email at ejforum@gmail.com or fax to the following numbers: 1. Speakers, Government Agencies, Local Government Units (LGUs), and Media c/o Public Information Office at Tel. No. +632 526 8129 2. Development Partners, Diplomatic Corps, Judges, NGOs/POs c/o the Philippine Judicial Academy at Tel. No. +632 552 9628 On-site registration will commence on 15 April 2009 (Wednesday), beginning at 2 p.m. until 4 p.m. at the respective hotel lobbies. Registration on 16 April 2009 (Thursday) will commence from 08:00 to 08:30 a.m. at the University of Cordilleras, Baguio City, University of the Philippines Visayas, Iloilo City, and Ateneo de Davao University, Davao City. Participants who have pre-registered will be given their respective IDs, while those who have not yet pre-registered are requested to secure their IDs from the Forum Secretariat. Kits will be given at the registration counter upon presentation of the ID. All participants must wear their IDs for the duration of the forum. I. MEALS and HOTEL ACCOMMODATION The following hotel accommodations are provided for participants coming from the regions/provinces outside of Baguio City, Iloilo City and Davao City from 15 April to 18 April 2009: • Luzon participants, except those residing in Baguio City, shall be given hotel accommodation at the Hotel Veniz, Baguio City. 3
  • 5. Visayas participants, except those residing in Iloilo City, shall be given hotel accommodation at the Amigo Hotel, Iloilo City. • Mindanao participants, except those residing in Davao City, shall be given hotel accommodation at the Royal Mandaya Hotel, Davao City. Check-in time is 2:00 p.m. of 15 April and the latest check-out time is at 12:00 noon of 18 April. Participants arriving earlier than the designated check-in time on 15 April or those who wish to depart beyond 18 April will shoulder the additional costs of accommodation. The organizers have reserved rooms on sharing arrangements with breakfast. Participants are requested to observe room assignments strictly. The organizers cannot guarantee room preference. Accompanying persons not invited to attend the forum will have to shoulder the costs of their own accommodation. Use of mini bar and outgoing calls from the hotel rooms are not allowed. However, should the participants wish to avail of these and other hotel services, they may do so at their own personal expense. Meal arrangement at the hotel accommodations will be provided as follows: • 15 April, Wednesday: Dinner • 16 April, Thursday: Breakfast and Dinner • 17 April, Friday: Breakfast and Dinner • 18 April, Saturday: Breakfast Lunch and Snacks during the Forum will be provided at the respective venues. J. REIMBURSEMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EXPENSES (for NGOs and Pos, and Judges ONLY) Participants coming from the regions/provinces outside of Baguio City, Iloilo City and Davao City may reimburse their transportation expenses upon furnishing the Finance Group the following documents: • Completed Itinerary of Travel; and • Original transportation tickets such as but not limited to plane fare tickets with boarding pass, bus and boat tickets. The reimbursement process will be done based on the following schedule and venue: • 15 April, 2-4 PM, Hotel: Submission of requirements • 16 April, 8 AM -12 NN, Forum Venue: Submission of requirements • 16 April, 1 PM – 4 PM, Forum Venue: Release of reimbursements • 17 April, 8 AM - 4 PM, Forum Venue: Release of reimbursements Participants are encouraged to take the most economical means of transportation to the venue. Only direct transportation expenses will be reimbursed. The reimbursement process shall be done in accordance with existing government accounting and auditing rules and regulations. K. SEATING ARRANGEMENTS OF PARTICIPANTS Participants are requested to be guided by the signage in finding their respective seats. Ushers and usherettes will also be posted before the start of the sessions to assist the participants in finding their seats. L. FORUM SECRETARIAT Should you have any concerns during the forum, please feel free to approach any of the Secretariat team members who can be identified through their respective I.D.s. Should you have other questions and request for additional information please refer them to any of the following: The Forum Secretariat: ejforum@gmail.com Armida M. Salazar Charmaine C. Saltivan (02) 552.95.23 to 24 Abigail T. Sze (02) 522.50.94 0928.500.98.72 4