This talk was presented at OSCON 2007 and YAPC::NA 2007.

1. Care and Feeding
of Large Web Applications
Perrin Harkins

2. Arcos, a project at Plus Three
About 2.5 years of continuous development
2 - 5 developers on the team during that time
~79,000 lines of Perl code
~4900 lines of SQL
(Computed with David Wheeler's SLOCCount
program)
Plenty of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript too
~14000 automated tests in 269 files
169 CPAN modules

3. Arcos, cont'd
CMS with modern AJAX UI
E-commerce
Data warehouse with AJAX query builder GUI
E-mail campaign management
Asynchronous job queue system
Comprehensive reporting

4. Arcos, cont'd
Object-oriented
MVC-ish
Controller classes
Database classes
Templates
Core modules:
CGI::Application
Class::DBI
HTML::Template

5. Deployment
Hard to generalize
.tar.gz files
Always release full builds, not individual files
Consistent state for production system
QA installs are accurate copies

6. The CPAN problem
“Just use the CPAN shell”
Fails too often
Installs whatever the latest version is

7. CPAN installer requirements:
Install specific versions
Install from local media
Allow locally modified versions
Fully automated
“Erase your hard drive? [n]”
Install in a local directory
Skip the tests
Cluster install
Some will never work

8. Our solution
Finds all modules in src/ directory of package
(Including ones we hacked)
Uses Expect to answer questions
Builds non-CPAN stuff too
Apache
mod_perl
SWISH-E search engine

9. Why bundle dependencies?
Avoid troubleshooting local problems
If possible, specify Perl, MySQL, OS, etc.
Sometimes reality intervenes
Hardware support
Office politics

10. Next up: binary distributions
Compile takes too long
Still just tar?
RPMs?
PAR?
See build system in Krang:
http://krancgcms.com/

11. OH HAI!
I HELP WIF UR
INDENTATION!

12. Upgrades
Need full automation
Got the database part
Schema version number in database
Run all upgrade scripts with appropriate names
e.g. 2.0 --> 3.0 means run upgrade/V2_1.pm and
upgrade/V3_0.pm
Hand-written SQL scripts
Test mode that upgrades from old schema first
LVM for rollback in QA

13. Configuration
● Highly configurable systems must be highly
configured
● Started with httpd.conf style
– Config::ApacheFormat
– Basic scoping and inheritance

14. Observations on Configuration
● People ignore options they don't understand
– If the server starts, it must be ok!
●
Some comments in a config file == weak
documentation
●
Things you rarely change shouldn't be in the
shipped config file

15. I CAN HAS
MAINTENANCE
BRANCH?

16. Version Control
Many tool choices now
svn, svk, git...
Fight it out and let me know who wins
Most projects need at least two branches at all
times
development
stable

17. Very simple version control
Main branch is development
Must build and pass tests
When making a release from a branch, tag it
Make a “2.0” tag when you release it

18. Very simple version control, cntd
Maintenance branch from that tag for bug fixes
“2.x” branch
On maintenance release, merge all changes on
maintenance branch to main branch
Tag “2.1” on 2.x branch
Merge 2.0 --> 2.1 onto main branch

19. Too simple?
Not everyone is done at the same time
Hard to keep dev branch stable for major
changes
Feature branches
Possible integration problems
Beware of complex merges
This is not the Linux kernel
Could be a people problem
An alternate point of view
http://utsl.gen.nz/talks/git-svn/intro.html

20. HALP!
TESTS R
FAYLIN!

21. Testing
● You all know the drill
● Local library for common testing tasks
– Log in mech object
– Run test SMTP server
● Test data setup and teardown
– Keep stack, delete in reverse order
– Probably easier to just wipe the db

22. Testing tools
● Simple Test::More scripts are easy
– But scoping becomes an issue
– Test::Class
– Test::Builder
● Improves test failure messages
●
Test::WWW::Mechanize
– Great for testing SSL, Apache config, mod_rewrite
– Works fine on JavaScript pages
● But doesn't test the JavaScript
● Selenium does

23. KTHXBYE!