SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 23
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16



                                              Introduction


With rapid advancement of global trade, FDI has been a subject of keen interest of research for
scholars world-wide. The mentioned article studies in detail various researches which have been
done on the subject of FDIs, the underlying patterns, their impact and the policy framework                    1
suggestions on home country and host country governments. In order to absorb and examine the
nuggets of useful information which the authors have presented it is important to have re-
capitulation of the basic nature of FDI including the drivers of FDI, classification & impacts of FDI on a
firm are required.

In order to therefore examine the subject, the authors therefore propose to divide the following
paper into seven sections

    1. FDI : Firm specific drivers to internationalize. In this section we propose to discuss the key
       drivers that leads a firm to internationalize through FDI route.

    2. FDI: Classification. We propose to understand the nature of FDI through classifying it as per
       various points-of-view which will help us to view FDI and its impact in different perspective.

    3. Host Country Perspective. National Welfare, development of comparative advantages.

    4. Home Country Perspective. Comparative Advantage and therefore welfare and
       enhancement of trade

    5. Policy framework

    6. Conclusions




        Authors:
        Pallav Vikash Chatterjee
        Debajyoti Saha
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16


    Foreign Direct Investments (FDI): Firm specific drivers to internationalize

        The basic rationale for Foreign Direct Investments (or FDI) by any firm in global market
        economy is to increase and / or protect their profitability and /or capital value. One of the
        most common ways through which firms are achieving this goal is by engaging into FDI,
        either to better exploit their existing competitive advantages1 or to safeguard, increase or to
        add to these advantages. (UNCTAD, 2006)                                                                2

        Although there can be host of conditions of political & economic nature that drives the firms
        to invest in foreign countries, but often the three most important determinants drive the
        firms to engage in FDI. Firstly, it is the smallness of their home market. Through the path of
        growth of the firm and with increasing internal scale & scope economies, the firms no longer
        find themselves able to achieve those advantages within the boundaries of home country.
        This happens because of higher production surpluses vis-a-vis the home country demand
        they start seeking the cost economies by expanding outside the national boundaries. Though
        initially exports provides a logical extension of domestic business activities to exploit the
        scale economies and utilize the larger international demand, it becomes imperative very
        soon for the firm to engage in internalization of various foreign-based essential activities
        critical to expanding consumption of its goods and services in international markets. Key
        activities could be marketing, finance, distribution, supply chain & other such functions
        managing which, may become increasingly difficult & complex with increasing geographic,
        economic & political variations between country to country. With such growing complexities
        and increasing difficulties of control, the firms may seek internalization of such activities in
        foreign countries so as to complement its comparative advantages to expand the
        consumption and hence business of its goods and services. The most often used route to
        acquire control over these functions is by route of FDI, investing in these functions critical to
        further growth of their business. Till so far, we have been concerning ourselves regarding
        smallness of the home country from demand-side, however, supply-side smallness can also
        be a factor equally important triggering the firm to seek for seeking international assets by
        way of FDI. A very pertinent example could be that of Indian Multinational ONGC Videsh, a
        state owned firm which has acquired assets in countries in Central Asia for instance for the
        purpose of exploration of Oil & Natural-Gas resources. Due to smallness or lack of
        endowment of the home country in key resources (Human Resource, Technological Assets,
        Institutional frame-work, Infrastructural resources, Natural Resources and in some cases
        even Land, etc) the firm may seek to look beyond national boundaries to acquire these
        resources through or make itself available intermediate goods in upstream value-chain
        through acquiring strategic assets in foreign countries by way of investing through FDI.

1
 Competitive advantage here refers to both Firm Specific Advantages as well as Comparative Advantage of the
home country in terms of resource endowments and opportunity costs, as both FSA and Comparative
Advantages enable the firm to compete profitably in foreign countries.
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16

Secondly, during the advanced phases of product-life-cycle (later phases of growth, shake-off,
maturity & decline) the competitive pressures build upon the firm posing a threat to sustenance of
their profitability. Under these stages of product life cycle, the firm finds the need of expanding
outside the home country (Vernon, 1979). The important conclusion of this point of view had been
that as the product progresses through the product-life-cycle the geographical location of firm
specific activities with regard to the product changes. In the introduction phase when the product
demand is small & the firm concentrates on its home market. But as it passes through the life-cycle,
                                                                                                               3
getting increasingly matured, the firm increasingly learning on more efficient methods of
production, scale economies rise, competition pressures build up with competition imitation of the
processes & learning the proprietory knowledge that firm had earlier enjoyed, it becomes
imperative for the firm to source its production from foreign countries with lesser costs of resources
and maintain its advantage over competition.

Thirdly and very importantly, Government too has a role to play in encouraging and driving the firms
to internationally expand. A variety of drivers may encourage the firms to internationalize and
engage in acquiring assets in foreign country and Government policy framework may facilitate to
trigger the process. Government as an institution employs people whose job is to look out for the
welfare of the state and protect the sovereignty of the nation. FDI in its both forms (inward and
outward) is deeply interlinked with the both aspects of effective national governance; therefore by
virtue of its role in the country, government plays an important role in both in-bound and out-bound
FDI. With rapid growth of FDIs and its impact on host countries as well as home countries, the article
examines the various policy stance being taken by governments to promote FDI, both outward as
well as inward. However, the article mentions various ongoing debates and researches which are
underway on these policy issues on impact of the benefit to the nations concerned.

The FDI drivers/motivators can therefore be summarized in following table

    a) Cost or Competitive Advantage or Economic Factors – Desire to be near supply sources, low
       cost of labour, productivity of labour, costs and availability of raw materials, Transportation
       costs, other financial benefits, infrastructure availability, Agglomeration (or in other words
       External Economies of scale), Technology development, etc. ( see also World Investment
       Report, 1998)

    b) Market Factors – Position in product-life-cycle, market size & growth, desire to maintain
       market share, desire to follow customers, desire to follow or outshine competition, establish
       export base, networking with customer base, etc. (Vernon , 1979)

    c) Government Policy, Political & Environment Factors – Policy inducements / incentives, tax
       policy, exchange rate stability, government attitude towards FDI, SEZs, availability of LIS
       (Local Industrial Set-ups), etc.
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                      2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16



                                    FDI: Nature & Classification
Of the two types of investment flows between nations – Portfolio investment and foreign direct
investment (FDI) – we are concerned primarily with FDI, because it is the ultimate stage of
internationalization, and encompasses the widest range of international business development. FDI
is the foreign entry strategy practiced by the most internationally active firms. Companies usually
engage in FDI for the long term, and retain partial or complete ownership of the assets they acquire.            4

In event of a firm deciding to look for business opportunities outside its national boundaries, its
choice of strategy comes down to one of the three approaches – Export, Contracting (Licensing or
management contract) or Own and control assets abroad. It is the last entry choice which is
popularly referred to as FDI. Therefore, FDI can be classified by way of choice of firms to enter an
international market that can be by way through following modes.

    a) Joint Venture, which is primarily a collaborative & jointly owned approach with another firm
       with sharing of financial stakes, assets & investments.



    b) Majority Ownership (or Subsidiary) where the firm chooses to acquire assets wholly by itself
       either by way of Greenfield investment (building assets de novo) or acquiring a foreign asset
       by way of Mergers & Acquisitions.



Generally it is observed that firms prefer merger & acquisitions over green field investments because
M&A are quicker to execute. Another reason can be foreign target firms can have valuable strategic
assets like trademarks or patents, brand loyalty, production systems, customer relationships,
distribution systems and so on. Also acquiring firms believe that they can increase the efficiency of
the acquired unit by transferring technology, capital or management skills.

Primarily FDI is used for strategic activities, including : a) To set up manufacturing or assembly
operations, or other physical facilities; b) To open a sales or representative office or other facility to
conduct marketing or distribution activities; c) To establish a regional headquarters. In the process
the firm establishes a new legal business entity, subject to the regulations of the host government.

There has been dramatic growth of FDI into various world regions since the 1980s and the trend
remains strong and, over time, is growing. The FDIs may be categorized on the basis of their source
& destination countries, following classification holds well on that basis2 :



2
 Detailed statistics of the extent and impact of various forms are available in World Investment Report, 2006,
UNCTAD , Chapter III, pp. 105-139
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16


        a. Developed Countries to Developed Countries

        b. Developed Countries to Developing Countries

        c. Developing Countries to Developed Countries

        d. Developing Countries to Developing Countries
                                                                                                               5


The FDIs concerning the developing countries is one which is of keen interest of researchers in
current day scenario as the volume of FDIs flowing out of developing countries have started growing

rapidly and has grown on to almost $1.4 trillion or 13% of the total global outward FDI stock
(UNCTAD, 2006). The FDI pattern of distribution in among the developing countries is illustrated in
the graphical illustration 1.




Graphical illustration 1 (Source : UNCTAD)

FDI activities can even be classified based on firm’s motives for engaging in acquisition of foreign
assets. These may be

        a) Resources seeking FDI : To serve local and regional demand. Reason for market-seeking
           FDI projects may be explained by the relative production and transaction costs of
           servicing markets through export or local production. Especially economies of scale,
           transportation costs, and exchange rates may influence the trade-off between exports
           and foreign production. Firms with low degrees of plant-level economies of scale and
           high transportation costs are more inclined to undertake market-seeking FDI projects.
           Need to stay closer to customers is another objective
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16


        b) Market seeking FDI: Objective of resource seeking FDI is to exploit comparative
           advantages of the host country. Firms can allocate production resources in countries
           where factor prices are low relative to firm’s productivity. Another advantage may be
           access to raw materials, part and components.

        c) Knowledge seeking FDI: Such FDI projects are undertaken to maintain or develop a
           better competitive position in certain product or geographical markets. This competitive            6
           position can be achieved by acquiring technological knowledge and capabilities and
           management expertise

        d) Efficiency seeking FDI: The purpose of efficiency seeking FDI projects is to rationalize the
           structure of established production units in such a way that a firm can benefit from the
           common governance of economic activities in different locations. Efficiency seeking FDI
           projects tend to occur in capital or technology intensive sectors in which the advantages
           of intra-industry and intra firm trade are the most prevalent. Firms in these sectors tend
           to differentiate their products as a form of competitive advantage. Potential benefits
           like economies of scale and economies of scope can be derived from product and
           geographical concentration and from process specialization. In efficiency-seeking FDI
           projects, the advantages of exploiting economies of scale and scope predominate over
           the importance of relative factor endowments across countries.

        e) Risk reduction seeking FDI: Risk reduction-seeking FDI projects are designed to reduce
           the corporate risk associated with unfavourable changes in macroeconomic variables,
           changes in supply and demand among national markets and the moves of competitors
           and of national and regional governments. These FDIs represent internal hedging
           activities conducted in order to reduce the level of corporate risk. Minimizing the firm’s
           exchange rate exposure is an important goal for risk reduction seeking FDIs. For
           instance, firms may handle exchange rate risk by moving production from unfavourable
           to favourable locations.


The Trans-National Corporates (TNCs) therefore guided by above motive factors engage themselves
in FDI in foreign countries, however eventually the decisions of engaging in FDI, with any of the
motives as above eventually leads the firms to enhanced profitability, higher net present value of
the future cash-flows & sustained competitive advantage which get possible to the firm as a whole
through such investment decisions and these remains the essential benchmarks for them to
evaluate the performance of the decision.
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16



            Host Country Perspective : Concerns & Impact of Inward FDI
Concerns

Government concerns on MNE on national welfare & sovereignty

Role of government is primarily concerned with national welfare and protection of sovereignty of
the nation. Any external force or obstacle to these objectives are seen by the governments as
                                                                                                               7
threat. However, in the case of interactions between the nation state and MNEs, the threat and so
the reaction is also subtle as well. Governments worry that if MNEs gain control of strategic national
assets and resources (e.g., oil, gas, metals, forests), they may not be able to control development of
their own resources. In extreme cases governments might worry that they might be held hostage
and forced to incur costs via lower taxes, or credits or subsidies provided to the MNE. For example,
Saudi Arabia sought to ensure that Western oil firms had explicit plans to guarantee the transfer of
technical capabilities to local employees, so that the foreign MNEs could not have an unacceptable
level of influence over oil production in the country. Governments also view MNEs as potential
threats to their independence if they become too strong as suppliers of critical resources

Concerns about impact on domestic firms

The competitive pressures on domestic firms can be too severe on country’s domestic firms due to
technological, capital and human resource advantages. Although many governments do
acknowledge that domestic firms need to adjust by either becoming more competitive or going out
of existence, the political pressures however may be too high in order to provide for protection to
domestic firms. Consequently research suggests governments are concerned about effects of FDI
and MNEs particularly on two types of domestic firms. Firstly, the firms in declining industries where
there may be structural reasons (for example, cheaper natural resources or labour in another
country), that may be at the heart of the decline of a particular industry and beyond the control of
the government. We see similar pressures on US textile and automobile industries, for example.
Secondly, governments are worried about firms in promising and embryonic industries. New
industries provide opportunity of income growth, higher productivities. FDI and MNE activities may
have the ability to destroy domestic firms in emerging industries due to their higher scales and cost
economies. In either cases government policies may not allow the MNEs to compete profitably in
the host country.

Concerns about hidden value

Governments are concerned about MNEs hiding value. One of the most obvious such concerns are
that the government have about MNEs is that they will hide profits and thereby avoid tax liability.
Because of their global networks, MNEs can move the profits from a high tax-rate country to a low
tax-rate country through fees and transfer pricing policies. While this may be attractive to MNEs but
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16
host governments may perceive this to be unfair and often illegal. Governments are also concerned
that MNEs will hide value by keeping advanced technology out of their countries. MNEs may achieve
this either by assigning low-technology tasks to operations within a certain country and by keeping
high-value added activities and benefits from the local economy or MNEs can keep high technology
by keeping high technology out the hands of local employees by assigning expatriate managers and
technical specialists to the subsidiary. Consequently, governments employ policies that require high
value-added technology to be incorporated into FDI proposals or limit the number, type and
duration of expatriate employees.
                                                                                                               8
Concerns about responsibility

Governments also worry about the social responsibility of MNEs. To the extent that MNEs are
viewed as “temporary” visitors in countries, with no long-term commitment to raising the standard
of living of citizens, governments worry about these firms exploiting opportunities and not being
around for longer-term negative consequences. For example, governments worry about MNEs in
natural resource extraction industries taking resources in the most economically efficient means
possible with little regard for environment consequences, worker safety, or societal health and
welfare. If disasters happen the individuals responsible may escape the arms of local justice or even
may be transferred out of the country by the MNE before the government can assess responsibility,
of the MNE may simply protect the people at headquarters who were responsible for formulating
and implementing the decisions that led to the disaster and its consequences. This issue, for
example is central to the continuing dispute of between Union Carbide and the government of India
concerning the Bhopal tragedy.

Impact and benefits to host economy

Economic cost benefit (Mathematical approach)

More often than not a government might not simply view the benefit of FDI in terms of the cash-
flow projections of an MNE engaging in FDI into the nation. In a competitive and free market
economy where there is no restriction on information, prices, entry barriers, both MNEs and
government can use the same sets of projections as measures of benefit to both the MNEs and the
society. However, externalities may exist which may restrict the free competitive market structure
and as a result there may happen to be price controls, wage restrictions , subsidies, tariffs, taxes and
other imperfections distorting values and therefore the cash flow projections of MNEs no longer
project the true value (or opportunity cost) of a resource to the society. As a consequence, the
government’s perspective of looking at an FDI proposal may vary from that of an MNE. As a common
approach governments look at maximization of national income as economic implication of FDI. For
looking at the benefits that accrue to the host economy, the governments of host economies
therefore use variety of tools to appraise the benefits to the economy from inward flow of FDI.
These tools may be Benefit-Cost Ratio, Present value of costs and benefits, Shadow price
adjustments and time-context based value.
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16
    a) Benefit-cost ratio

        The basic benefit cost ratio may be expressed as follows

        [{F+R*+T} – O + N] / E

        Where F = the local factor payments that the MNE pays to labour, management and land
        (wages, salary & rent)

        R* = the after tax payments to local capital (profits, dividends, interest)                            9

        O = opportunity cost of local factors

        N = net external economies, these are spill-over effects of benefit on local economy which
        can be positive ( forcing domestic firms to adopt better quality, lower prices, higher
        employment, etc) or negative (structural unemployment or discouragement of local
        entrepreneurs)

        E = payments to external factors of production including technology (profits, dividends,
        interest, royalties, management fees, and so on that gets transferred out of the country)

    b) Present Value of costs and benefits

        To calculate present value of streams of flow of costs and benefits that occur over a period
        of time an appropriate discount rate needs to be applied. However, because private and
        social values differ in a situation of market imperfections, the private and social discount
        rates also differ. An MNE will select an appropriate discount rate which will be risk adjusted
        and that may equal to the marginal opportunity costs of its capital (FDI invested) adding a
        risk premium to account for political risks. Government however, will seek to maximize the
        income effects on the economy by the proposed FDI and therefore select a discount rate
        that will reflect the marginal productivity of capital in its economy. Since governments are
        always under pressure for accumulating foreign exchange, controlling inflation or reducing
        unemployment, they will tend to assign higher discount value to near-term benefits than
        longer term benefits while appraising a proposal of FDI.

    c) Shadow price adjustments and benefit – cost analysis

        Shadow prices are intended to measure accurately the opportunity costs of various inputs
        and the utility of the outputs to the society. In determining the revenue benefit to the firm,
        the MNE would simply calculate the nominal sales expected to be generated. The value of
        these outputs to the society can differ from the MNE’s estimate. If the output is import
        substituting then the value of the output is the same as the value of the imports and vary
        from the MNEs simple calculation of nominal sales because of reasons like import tariffs that
        makes the domestic prices differing from the import prices (world prices).

        Export-generating output also very similarly is to be valued on the basis of world market
        price rather than domestic price. In addition to these adjustments, specially in countries with
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16
        fixed exchange rate regimes or policy intervention framework in exchange rates, a necessary
        correction needs to be made on basis of shadow-exchange-rate (unofficial exchange rate)
        that may determine the real value of the output in domestic currency terms. In many cases
        domestic currency is overvalued or undervalued under policy interventions, in such cases
        the real value of the costs / benefits of the FDI in foreign currency terms should be
        translated to local currency terms using the unofficial shadow-exchange-rate that
        determines more accurately the real value of the currency and therefore the benefit or the
        cost of the activity to the society.
                                                                                                               10
    d) Time-context based value of the benefit-cost to the society

        During the first few years after the firm has engaged in FDI, the firms would usually expect
        lower cash-flows or profits. During the course of these initial years, extent of inward
        investments would be higher, when the firm (MNE) will be building up capacities,
        transferring technologies, provide employment by recruiting staff / labour, providing
        training to local manpower, etc. During these early years there will be efforts from the firm
        to build higher scales to ensure economies in costs. However, over a period of time these
        inflows will reduce in a continuum as the FDI project matures and the benefits to the firm
        increase with growing scales. However, on the contrary government (society) may perceive
        the benefits higher in the initial years and the perception of benefit of the FDI may reduce
        with passage of time as the inward flow of these economic benefits continue to reduce. The
        phenomenon is illustrated in figure 2 exhibited below. This phenomenon may create a zone
        of disagreement between benefit perception to the firm and the benefit perception to the
        host economy (society or government).




          Graphical Illustration 2



Apart from the above concerns and divergent views of appraisal of FDI benefits and costs to the
society in economic value terms it is well known to have positive benefits of FDI on host economy.
The benefits to the host country can be summarized as below.
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16
    a) Primary contributions. These may include following

                          •    Lower price due to competitive advantage of parent MNEs.

                          •    Higher quality & differentiation

                          •    Inflow of additional resources – Capital, Technology & Management
                               skills which raise the efficiency and volumes of domestic output

                          •    Export enhancement – specially in case of FDI in export oriented units,         11
                               where the MNEs invest to exploit resources in host country to provide
                               for intermediate inputs to its various facilities in global network. The
                               benefit even accrues in case of finished good exports by MNEs (for
                               instance small cars from India, computers & electronic goods from
                               China). MNEs may benefit by achieving cost and competitive advantages
                               due to technological or factor cost advantages from the host economy
                               while host economy benefits in income growth through export
                               enhancement.

                          •    Agglomeration effects – FDI in economically laggard areas, if directed
                               through conscious policy and institutional framework support by local
                               government may have a spiralling virtuous effect of developing external
                               scale economies and local entrepreneurship in order to develop
                               agglomeration effects & hence rise in the economic welfare and growth
                               of the area in the host economy. This may be achieved where FDI by
                               MNEs may be attracted where MNEs benefit by lower factor costs,
                               availability of specific input resources and government incentives and
                               subsidies. Early start in such cases or import restrictions on certain
                               goods and services which are governed by external scale economies,
                               may provide this form of welfare advantage to the host economy. The
                               MNE may bring in technological expertise, develop SMEs & suppliers,
                               support industries in the agglomeration as a result of the FDI.

    b) Secondary benefits

                          •    Production enhancement: The MNE may benefit the host economy by
                               providing demand of inputs from the local suppliers. For instance, local
                               auto component suppliers for a car company.

                          •    Demand Creation: There can be instances when the MNE creates
                               demands for goods for its subsidiary in the host country in world market
                               (or home country market for the parent firm) for the parent firm units to
                               source critical supplies.
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16


    c) Externalities

                          •    Enhancing productivity of host country firms through introduction of
                               new technologies, opening international channels of sourcing for more
                               efficient supplies of input goods etc.

                          •    Foreign investors provide host country firms that originate as suppliers
                                                                                                               12
                               new opportunities to become producer of goods/services to other
                               buyers in the international economy. For example, Malaysian machine
                               tool firms that originated selling equipment and services to INTEL in
                               Malaysia follow the MNC to China, and begin to sell equipment and
                               services to US, Europe, and Japanese firms in Chinese market.
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16



                          Home Country Perspective : Outward FDI
FDIs have positive effects on the home country (originating country), some of these advantages have
been reported by firms as per UNCTAD survey (see Graphical illustration 3 at the end of the section),
to be market expansion, efficiency gains, obtaining strategic assets, access to natural resources and
financial gain. Principally, outward FDI helps the home country to utilize its comparative advantage
and maximize welfare through mobility of factors and by the effects of specialization. FDI may form            13
an alternative to productive specialization through trade when there are constraints that limit trade
to actually take place. These restrictions to trade may trigger mobility of factor (capital resources)
and encourage flow of capital from home country in form of FDI. Among variety of such reasons, few
particularly important are as follows:

    a) High transportation costs relative to the value of the output of production limiting the
       effects of benefits of trade. Transportation cost is a function of weight, volume, distance and
       haulage of transportation carriers involved in transportation of goods. In the cases of goods
       with low value to weight or value to volume ratios, the transportation cost therefore, will
       constitute to very high proportion to the final price of the goods sold renderring the
       opportunity cost advantage irrelevant while competing with other sources of supplies of
       such goods which are geographically nearer to the final point of consumption. Mineral ores
       – bauxite or iron ore are such examples. Therefore in order to retain and protect the
       comparative advantage firms may seek to internalize the specific production processes or
       resources leading to such goods in the host countries which are either themselves the target
       markets for consumption or nearer to the points of consumption. This way the firms tend to
       gain through specialization in the products and processes where they have comparative
       advantage.

    b) Higher factor rewards for capital also encourage the firms from the home countries to
       engage in FDI. For instance reward for capital (rent, profits, dividends, interest etc)
       encourage the firms to shift capital to the host country where the rewards are higher,
       thereby taking advantage of the endowment of that specific factor (capital) to gain higher
       rewards in form of rent, profits, dividends and interests.

    c) MNEs may have factor specific advantages like efficient production processes (factor
       combinations, production technologies, Intellectual Property Rights). In order to acquire
       competitive advantage to compete in global markets efficiently they may require other
       factors of production at most economic opportunity costs, which may not be available in the
       home country. Therefore this triggers the MNE to engage in FDI in order to internalize low
       factors available at comparatively lower opportunity costs in the host countries (for instance
       cheap labour, raw materials etc). This explains movement of FDI from developed countries
       to developing countries having lower cost of labour, raw materials, natural resources etc.
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16


    d) Need for acquisition of technology & efficient production know-how: FDI may also be
       directed from the home country to acquire technological advantages, advantages of
       production know-how, efficient production technologies optimizing right mix of inputs to
       production. This mainly happens in case of FDI originating from LDCs (Less Developed
       Countries) or emerging markets (South – North FDI, UNCTAD). Such lack of technological
       advantage may restrict the home country to promote trade and maximize their societal
       welfare; FDI in such cases maximizes trade opportunities.                                               14

        In addition to above the effect of FDI on the home country can also be on the local business
        environment of the home economy (point of origin economy of FDI). It refers to
        subcontracting relations and local externalities induced by the demand for specialized
        inputs, services, managerial and operative skills and it has to do with supporting firm’s
        employment effect. In such contexts production in foreign affiliates can induce two effects -
        firstly, substitutive effect of employment in local context in which the MNE operates due to
        (i) reduction of domestic low skilled labor, (ii) loss of market shares by local suppliers, loss of
        opportunity to grow and learn through the relationship with parent firm, (iii) write-off of
        previous sub contracting relations. This can even happen secondly due to complementary
        effects which occur whenever the enhanced competitive position of the parent company
        and its additional demand for specialized inputs do increase the externalities on the local
        context. Transfer of production abroad may have a positive effect when parent company’s
        suppliers become suppliers for foreign affiliates. In such a case market for suppliers expands.
        Resource seeking FDI can induce upgrading in local system and in supply chain
        competitiveness by promoting differentiation in specialization and competencies between
        countries.




                 Graphical Illustration 3
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16



                                          Policy Framework
The article discusses at length on the debates over policy framework issues under practice which
necessarily the Host country should bring into force and what are the possible effects of those
policies on overall effectiveness in promoting national welfare, protection and enhancement of
competitive and comparative advantage.
                                                                                                               15
Trend

The article mentions that there is a current trend by the host countries to incentivize FDI directly or
indirectly. Under direct measures of incentivization, there is exemption of taxes, direct subsidies, etc
while under indirect measures governments are facilitating FDI through cheaper allocation of
resources in the home country like allocating land in SEZs at cheaper rates etc. While the article
mentions that incentivization of FDI (directly or indirectly) by any means is not the only or best
strategy to adopt, but this has been mainly due to the “prisoners’ dilemma” effect arising due to
nations competing against each other to attract FDI in their respective countries.

We have analyzed the perception of benefits & concerns of inward FDI from the host-country
government perspective, where we have concluded that the perceived benefit from FDI to the host
government is the largest in the initial legs of the investment from the benefit-cost point of view.
However, over time as the MNE investing in the country gains scale advantages, the perceived
benefit to the host government slowly starts declining, when there are slowing inflow of benefits in
terms of capital in-flow, know-how, technology or employment over the period of time with
increasing zone of disagreement between the respective benefits perceived by the host country and
the MNE (reference graphical illustration 2, page no. 10). This indicates that from policy point of
view the host-country governments should not only consider the benefit of FDI in terms of short-
term impact to the host economy but longer-term benefits that could be derived upon. Any policy
framework that enables to benefit the society in longer term and also benefitting the MNE investing
in the country would be the most beneficial policy stand which a government should take.

As in the previous section we have considered the short term benefit-cost consideration as in terms
of benefits net off all costs (opportunity costs, costs factor payments flowing out of the country), the
government should also consider the gains to the economy in enhancing welfare through increased
productivity, absorptive capacities of local firms, entrepreneurship development, agglomeration
benefits etc triggering from the FDI flowing in. Any policy stand that can help attracting FDI and
benefit the host country in such a fashion should be benefitting the economy the most.

Therefore, any policy framework that focuses on attractive FDI only through incentives could
therefore stands a risk of being a “myopic” policy and such short sighted policy framework may not
result the host-economy to gain maximum advantage from inflow of foreign capital through FDI. The
article points out debates on the benefits of FDI on developing local industries in Ireland and similar
such places where incentives have formed the central part of the strategy to attract FDI.
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                  2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16


FDI Incentive Policies

On the expectation that MNCs will raise employment, exports, or tax revenue, or that some of the
knowledge brought by the foreign companies may spill over to the host country private sector, many
governments have also introduced various forms of investment incentives, to encourage foreign
owned companies to invest in their jurisdiction.
                                                                                                               16
There have been numerous such examples of incentivization by governments to attract inward FDI,
some such notable examples are as below.

    Governments of Britain and France competed with each other on the incentives they offered
    Toyota to invest in their respective countries.

    Kentucky in United States offered Toyota an incentive package worth $112 million to persuade it
    to build its US automobile assembly plants there. The package included tax breaks, new state
    spending on infrastructure, and low-interest loans.

    British government provided an estimated $30,000 and $50,000 per employee to attract
    Samsung & Siemens respectively to the North East of England in 1990s.


These incentives can take the following forms

    -     Tax holidays – Low direct (corporate, income tax) or indirect taxes (excise, value added tax
          etc)

    -     Preferential tariffs

    -     Special Economic Zones / Export Processing Zones

    -     Financial subsidies on investment

    -     Soft loans / loan guarantees

    -     Free land, assets or Infrastructure or alternatively subsidies in such investments.

    -     Job training or employment subsidies

    -     R&D subsidies

    -     Derogation from regulations

Are FDI incentives justified?

Host countries apply these measures considering the positive benefits of FDI on the host country and
with the consideration of spill-over effects of FDI on welfare like employment creation, learning of
best practices & efficient methods of production by the domestic industries.
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16


These incentives are therefore extended to the MNEs investing in the host-country considering the
superiority in terms of foreign firms over the domestic ones in terms of efficiencies, productivities &
technology.

So far we have discussed how government incentives and policies attract FDI inflows. But it needs to
be investigated whether these incentives are justified. These will be justified only if the host nation is
subjected to welfare effects resulting out of FDI inflows. Otherwise these incentives are not worth            17
taking.

FDIs are expected to generate spillovers which mean the positive effects/benefits emanating from
FDI, which go beyond the direct benefits. Foreign MNCs may:

                 Contribute to efficiency by breaking supply bottlenecks
                 Introduce new know-how by demonstrating new technologies and training workers
                 who later take employment in local firms
                 Improve allocative efficiency by entering into industries with high entry barriers and
                 reducing monopolistic distortions. Also stimulates competition and efficiency
                 Transfer techniques for inventory and quality control and standardization to their
                 local suppliers and distribution channels.
                 Force local firms to increase their quality managerial efforts or to adopt some
                 managerial and marketing techniques used by MNC.
                 Enhance productivity of local firms with knowledge/technology transfer
                 Force domestic firms to modernize by imposing on them minimum standards of
                 quality, delivery dates , prices, etc in their supplies of parts and raw materials

However, the article cautions over those policies of FDI attraction (like for instance Incentives)
without considering the implied benefits of such FDIs, may be detrimental to the welfare of the host-
country. The benefits of inward FDI, for instance is through the absorptive capacities of the local
firms, to gain from the spillover effects of inward FDI. If the absorptive capacities of the local firms
are low or if the structure of the home economy is such that it cannot maximize the learning
advantages from inward FDI, attracting FDI through incentives may cause welfare reduction. The
article therefore criticizes such forms of FDI attraction policies on essentially because of folllowing
issues

    a) There are variety of factors that facilitates or restricts the absorptive effects of local firms
       (learning of best management practices, productivity enhancement etc). Therefore if the
       inward-FDI is promoted through FDI without due-considerations to those factors which may
       restrict the absorption by local firms, It may amount to unjustified discriminatory way of
       reinforcing competitive advantage against domestic producers affecting local industries and
       therefore reduction of welfare to the host-country economy.

    b) It may have international crowding out effects. International crowding out effect is
       expansionary fiscal policies of government due to high incentivization expenses may result in
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16
        hardening of interest rates, appreciation of local currency affecting exports and therefore
        undermining the accelerator benefits of Government spending on domestic GDP growth.

    c) De Propris et al., suggest that incentivizing FDI in Local industrial systems (LIS) is unnecessary
       unless there are laggard agglomerations (backward areas), as there will be no significant
       benefit to the welfare of the host-country through absorptive effects of FDI on local firms.

    d) From various studies it has been concluded that the LCs who are predominantly MNEs or at
       least who are involved in exports (trade) have greater absorptive capacity than their purely            18
       local counterparts. Therefore instead of just considering policy measures to attract inward
       FDIs, therefore there should be policy adopted for promotion of both inward and outward
       FDI, which may create maximum welfare through increased absorptive capacities of home-
       grown MNEs or micro MNEs (SMEs who are internationalizing).



Therefore considering above, a more holistic view should be taken by the host governments towards
inward FDI, which may help maximizing economic welfare.
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16



                                               Conclusions
        FDI according to Dunning emerges due to ownership, internalization and locational
        advantages. Foreign companies will be attracted to the host country if it can seek significant
        locational advantages in the host country. But with rising pressures of globalization induced
        competitiveness, the locational advantages based on only the economic conditions may not
        be able to sustain their strength of attracting FDI. Possessing the principal determinants like        19
        market size, real income levels, skill levels, infrastructure and other resources, favorable
        trade policies and macroeconomic stability may not be sufficient for the host countries to
        attract FDI. For this matter focus now has shifted to government policies in addition to
        economic conditions as determinant of FDI.

        In furtherance, rather than only to concentrate on pulling FDI, if spill-over effects of FDI are
        not maximized, the activity may bear no fruit of welfare for the economy. Therefore
        government policies should also be directed inwards towards enhancement of comparative
        advantages, developing new specializations through development of entrepreneurship,
        development of specialized agglomerations, development of productivity of factors of
        production, skill enhancement of local labour, acquisition of new technologies etc.

        Therefore Government policies should be two pronged, one with a pull strategy which
        should incorporate attracting FDI through maximizing the Ownership, Locational or
        Internalization advantages of investing MNEs on other hand it should be directed towards
        enhancing domestic competition, absorptive capacities of local firms, and development of
        home-grown MNEs.

        Pull strategy

        a) Overall economic policy that increases locational advantages for FDI by improving
           following economic fundamentals of the host country:

                               Market size: Large market size generates scale economies while growing
                               market improves market potential and attracts FDI.
                               Cost factors: Includes cost of labor, cost of capital and infrastructure
                               costs. Lower wage rates, availability of skilled labor aids FDI. Also lower
                               interest rates increases domestic consumption leading to more FDI
                               inflows. Higher the infrastructure present, lower is infrastructure costs
                               and more will be FDI inflows.
                               Real exchange rates: Foreign investors seem to gain from devalued
                               exchange rate of the host country. They may gain due to larger buying
                               power in host countries. Also they can produce more cheaply and export
                               more easily.
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16



                          Macroeconomic stability: Macroeconomic variables like inflation, budget,
                          balance of payments affect FDI inflows. For instance exchange rate can
                          adversely affect the competitiveness of the plants in different countries.
                          Stability of exchange rates of the currency in host country encourage
                          investment by foreign firms as it increases uncertainty regarding the future
                          economic and business prospects of the host country.
                                                                                                               20
                          Overall economic stability: Financial health of the host economy is capture
                          by the ratio of external debts to exports. It is expected that lower this ratio
                          higher is the probability of economic stability in the country. Resulting in
                          more FDI inflows.

        b) National FDI policies reduce transaction costs of foreign firms entering the economy:

                 Tariff policies: FDI is deterred by the high tariffs or non tariff barriers on imported
                 inputs and is attracted to more open economies. Higher openness to trade to attract
                 higher FDI inflows. Policies can be categorized into:

                      Fiscal incentives: Reduces tax burden of a firm. It includes tax concessions in the
                      form of reduction of the standard corporate income-tax rate, tax holidays,
                      depreciation allowances on capital taxes, exemption from import duties and
                      duty drawbacks on exports. It also includes provision of guarantee for
                      repatriation of investments and profits and establishing mechanisms for
                      settlements of investment disputes.

                      Financial incentives: These include grants, subsidized loans and loan guarantees,
                      publicly funded venture capital and government insurance at preferential rates.

        c) Removal of restrictions:

             Due to the enforcement of TRIMS (Trade Related Investment Measures) many
             restrictions were eliminated, with removal of such restrictions FDI flows are maximized.

                      Entry barriers
                      Ownership & control restrictions
                      Allowing only fixed portion of foreign owned capital in an enterprise
                      Compulsory joint ventures
                      Mandatory transfer of ownership to local private firms over a period of time
                      Restrictions on reimbursements of capital upon liquidation
                      Restrictions on employment of foreign key personnel, and performance
                      requirements, sourcing, training requirements, export targets.
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16


        d) Development of institutional framework

             Institutional framework which facilitates smooth and transparent establishment of new
             businesses that may facilitate MNEs to smoothly establish their business activities

                 Reforms in licenses, permissions required to establish businesses.

                 Education / Technical skill bases – to provide adequate pool of skilled local labour          21
                 resources

                 Corruption or Graft – ensuring transparencies in local governance, enhancing
                 investors’ confidence on local business environment and thereby reducing their
                 perceptions of political risks associated with the FDI.

                 Well developed labour policies - trade-unionism, weak labour policies etc in long run
                 have negative impact on investor confidence. Due to non adequate legislations in
                 place on such issues, there are frequent unrests, issues that interrupt regular
                 business & add to the costs to the MNE in investing. Therefore strong legal &
                 institutional framework on such issues helps the MNEs scale the host-country highly
                 on business environment attractiveness.

                 Basile (2004) notes that existence of public research and business services can be
                 used to attract FDIs by MNEs. These existing institutions in the host-country
                 maximizes the locational & cost advantages for the MNEs.

Maximization of domestic welfare

Spillover (benefits) effects of FDI from MNEs may happen in variety of forms – technological,
entrepreneurial, productivity, wages etc. Therefore these policies should act complementarily along
with the strategies meant to pull FDI.

             Development of R&D investments to bridge technological gap and therefore enhance
             spillover effects (Bellak & Nuran)

             Research suggests geographic proximity as in agglomeration enhances the possibility of
             spillover effects. Therefore creation of local agglomeration with advantages of external
             scales of economies which may attract FDI on one hand and on other enhance welfare
             through spillover effects of FDI. De-propris et al., suggests that there are difficulties in
             embeddedness of MNEs in clusters due to variety of road-blocks like difficulty in
             grasping the governance mechanism, idiosyncratic coordination, and adjust to the
             collective learning system. That is why Piscitello & Rabbiosi provided a practical but
             controversial suggestion of promoting acquisitions in clusters as already existing firms
             are more or less embedded in the system and therefore FDI through acquisition by
             MNEs would accelerate the positive spillover effects.
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16
             De Backer and Sleuwaegen support the development of a techno-economic
             infrastructure aimed at clustering foreign and domestic investments, allied to policies
             designed to stimulate technological development and international exploitation of
             technological advantages. These are considered as the best options for the successful
             development of a sustainable industrial base. While such measures increase the
             likelihood of spillovers, the authors indicate that there is no guarantee that they will
             happen automatically.

             Since studies suggest that presence of domestic MNEs enhances the absorptive                      22
             capacities, Durán and Úbeda envisage an important role for public policy in stimulating
             the inward-outward investment dynamic, and that Government action should occur at
             various levels (short-term, long-term, general and specific, promoting LAs but also the
             development of Firm Specific Advantages or FSAs in other words, in companies based in
             their jurisdiction). They further suggest incentives for investments in R&D, technical
             collaborations and alliances to enhance the absorptive capacity of local firms
Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies                    2011
Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int.
J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16


Bibliography

    1.   UNCTAD , World Investment Report 2006, Chapter IV, pp. 142
    2.   Vernon, Raymond, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 41 (November 1979): 255-267
    3.   Course Materials
    4.   Web Resources (Wikipedia)
                                                                                                               23

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Introduction to international business - Manu Melwin Joy
Introduction to international business - Manu Melwin JoyIntroduction to international business - Manu Melwin Joy
Introduction to international business - Manu Melwin Joymanumelwin
 
Ft answers
Ft answersFt answers
Ft answerssumit235
 
Dealing with risks in internationa business
Dealing with risks in internationa businessDealing with risks in internationa business
Dealing with risks in internationa businessibc-business-strategy
 
Country-attractiveness
 Country-attractiveness Country-attractiveness
Country-attractivenessSujen Nisha
 
Exporting, Importing, and Countertrade: Studycase of 3M and Pakistan Export P...
Exporting, Importing, and Countertrade: Studycase of 3M and Pakistan Export P...Exporting, Importing, and Countertrade: Studycase of 3M and Pakistan Export P...
Exporting, Importing, and Countertrade: Studycase of 3M and Pakistan Export P...Silvio Adriano
 
1 introd. to international_
1  introd. to international_1  introd. to international_
1 introd. to international_rinkal gupta
 
International Marketing Environment/trade barriers/ regional blocks/country r...
International Marketing Environment/trade barriers/ regional blocks/country r...International Marketing Environment/trade barriers/ regional blocks/country r...
International Marketing Environment/trade barriers/ regional blocks/country r...viveksangwan007
 
Mgt520 international business (replace)
Mgt520   international business (replace)Mgt520   international business (replace)
Mgt520 international business (replace)Taim786
 
Relation Between Inflow Of FDI and The Development Of India's Economy
Relation Between Inflow Of FDI and The Development Of India's EconomyRelation Between Inflow Of FDI and The Development Of India's Economy
Relation Between Inflow Of FDI and The Development Of India's EconomyIJTEMT
 
Ppt 02 international strategy
Ppt 02   international strategyPpt 02   international strategy
Ppt 02 international strategyPadmini Agrawal
 
Presentation for international marketing
Presentation for international marketingPresentation for international marketing
Presentation for international marketingPravin Rathod
 

Mais procurados (20)

Introduction to international business - Manu Melwin Joy
Introduction to international business - Manu Melwin JoyIntroduction to international business - Manu Melwin Joy
Introduction to international business - Manu Melwin Joy
 
Ft answers
Ft answersFt answers
Ft answers
 
1bo 1
1bo 11bo 1
1bo 1
 
FDI
FDIFDI
FDI
 
Dealing with risks in internationa business
Dealing with risks in internationa businessDealing with risks in internationa business
Dealing with risks in internationa business
 
Global Management 3
Global  Management 3Global  Management 3
Global Management 3
 
Country-attractiveness
 Country-attractiveness Country-attractiveness
Country-attractiveness
 
Exporting, Importing, and Countertrade: Studycase of 3M and Pakistan Export P...
Exporting, Importing, and Countertrade: Studycase of 3M and Pakistan Export P...Exporting, Importing, and Countertrade: Studycase of 3M and Pakistan Export P...
Exporting, Importing, and Countertrade: Studycase of 3M and Pakistan Export P...
 
1 introd. to international_
1  introd. to international_1  introd. to international_
1 introd. to international_
 
GEEM Website D1_CONTINU
GEEM Website D1_CONTINUGEEM Website D1_CONTINU
GEEM Website D1_CONTINU
 
International Marketing Environment/trade barriers/ regional blocks/country r...
International Marketing Environment/trade barriers/ regional blocks/country r...International Marketing Environment/trade barriers/ regional blocks/country r...
International Marketing Environment/trade barriers/ regional blocks/country r...
 
Mgt520 international business (replace)
Mgt520   international business (replace)Mgt520   international business (replace)
Mgt520 international business (replace)
 
Inter.business
Inter.businessInter.business
Inter.business
 
Ibm unit - i
Ibm   unit - iIbm   unit - i
Ibm unit - i
 
Ibiii ibe
Ibiii ibeIbiii ibe
Ibiii ibe
 
Relation Between Inflow Of FDI and The Development Of India's Economy
Relation Between Inflow Of FDI and The Development Of India's EconomyRelation Between Inflow Of FDI and The Development Of India's Economy
Relation Between Inflow Of FDI and The Development Of India's Economy
 
Global Management 8
Global  Management 8Global  Management 8
Global Management 8
 
Global Management 1
Global  Management 1Global  Management 1
Global Management 1
 
Ppt 02 international strategy
Ppt 02   international strategyPpt 02   international strategy
Ppt 02 international strategy
 
Presentation for international marketing
Presentation for international marketingPresentation for international marketing
Presentation for international marketing
 

Semelhante a Article Review Fdi

Exploring the link between foreign direct investment and multinational enterp...
Exploring the link between foreign direct investment and multinational enterp...Exploring the link between foreign direct investment and multinational enterp...
Exploring the link between foreign direct investment and multinational enterp...Alexander Decker
 
International Business Management Summary by k.jeetun BSc(Hons) Management
International Business Management  Summary  by k.jeetun BSc(Hons) Management International Business Management  Summary  by k.jeetun BSc(Hons) Management
International Business Management Summary by k.jeetun BSc(Hons) Management Karishma Jeetun
 
Corporate Capital of Domestic and Foreign Firms in Africa – An Empirical Review
Corporate Capital of Domestic and Foreign Firms in Africa – An Empirical ReviewCorporate Capital of Domestic and Foreign Firms in Africa – An Empirical Review
Corporate Capital of Domestic and Foreign Firms in Africa – An Empirical ReviewIOSRJBM
 
Foreign Direct Invectments in Developing countries
Foreign Direct Invectments in Developing countriesForeign Direct Invectments in Developing countries
Foreign Direct Invectments in Developing countriesMunashe Kamwemba
 
The Relationship between Foreign Trade and Financial Performance of the Liste...
The Relationship between Foreign Trade and Financial Performance of the Liste...The Relationship between Foreign Trade and Financial Performance of the Liste...
The Relationship between Foreign Trade and Financial Performance of the Liste...IOSRJBM
 
Review of FDI Policies in India and China: Analysis and Interpretation
Review of FDI Policies in India and China: Analysis and InterpretationReview of FDI Policies in India and China: Analysis and Interpretation
Review of FDI Policies in India and China: Analysis and InterpretationVandanaSharma356
 
Ms 97 international business
Ms 97 international businessMs 97 international business
Ms 97 international businesssmumbahelp
 
Preliminary Business Plan Report Rubrics 1. Completi
 Preliminary Business Plan Report Rubrics  1. Completi Preliminary Business Plan Report Rubrics  1. Completi
Preliminary Business Plan Report Rubrics 1. CompletiTatianaMajor22
 
The Determinants Of Foreign Direct Investment
The Determinants Of Foreign Direct InvestmentThe Determinants Of Foreign Direct Investment
The Determinants Of Foreign Direct InvestmentPatricia Johnson
 
Ibs arani das roll 10_a
Ibs arani das roll 10_aIbs arani das roll 10_a
Ibs arani das roll 10_aArani Das
 
Industrial Economics(Elective Course)
Industrial Economics(Elective Course)Industrial Economics(Elective Course)
Industrial Economics(Elective Course)DESH D YADAV
 
Managing people in global market notes @ mba bec doms on hr
Managing people in global market notes @ mba bec doms on hrManaging people in global market notes @ mba bec doms on hr
Managing people in global market notes @ mba bec doms on hrBabasab Patil
 
Literature On Foreign Direct Investment
Literature On Foreign Direct InvestmentLiterature On Foreign Direct Investment
Literature On Foreign Direct InvestmentAndrea Lee
 

Semelhante a Article Review Fdi (20)

Exploring the link between foreign direct investment and multinational enterp...
Exploring the link between foreign direct investment and multinational enterp...Exploring the link between foreign direct investment and multinational enterp...
Exploring the link between foreign direct investment and multinational enterp...
 
INTL 313 Paper
INTL 313 PaperINTL 313 Paper
INTL 313 Paper
 
International Business Management Summary by k.jeetun BSc(Hons) Management
International Business Management  Summary  by k.jeetun BSc(Hons) Management International Business Management  Summary  by k.jeetun BSc(Hons) Management
International Business Management Summary by k.jeetun BSc(Hons) Management
 
Corporate Capital of Domestic and Foreign Firms in Africa – An Empirical Review
Corporate Capital of Domestic and Foreign Firms in Africa – An Empirical ReviewCorporate Capital of Domestic and Foreign Firms in Africa – An Empirical Review
Corporate Capital of Domestic and Foreign Firms in Africa – An Empirical Review
 
Foreign Direct Invectments in Developing countries
Foreign Direct Invectments in Developing countriesForeign Direct Invectments in Developing countries
Foreign Direct Invectments in Developing countries
 
The Relationship between Foreign Trade and Financial Performance of the Liste...
The Relationship between Foreign Trade and Financial Performance of the Liste...The Relationship between Foreign Trade and Financial Performance of the Liste...
The Relationship between Foreign Trade and Financial Performance of the Liste...
 
Review of FDI Policies in India and China: Analysis and Interpretation
Review of FDI Policies in India and China: Analysis and InterpretationReview of FDI Policies in India and China: Analysis and Interpretation
Review of FDI Policies in India and China: Analysis and Interpretation
 
Strategic impact of inward Foreign Direct Investments on the labour markets o...
Strategic impact of inward Foreign Direct Investments on the labour markets o...Strategic impact of inward Foreign Direct Investments on the labour markets o...
Strategic impact of inward Foreign Direct Investments on the labour markets o...
 
Ms 97 international business
Ms 97 international businessMs 97 international business
Ms 97 international business
 
Preliminary Business Plan Report Rubrics 1. Completi
 Preliminary Business Plan Report Rubrics  1. Completi Preliminary Business Plan Report Rubrics  1. Completi
Preliminary Business Plan Report Rubrics 1. Completi
 
The Determinants Of Foreign Direct Investment
The Determinants Of Foreign Direct InvestmentThe Determinants Of Foreign Direct Investment
The Determinants Of Foreign Direct Investment
 
Fdi
FdiFdi
Fdi
 
Ibs arani das roll 10_a
Ibs arani das roll 10_aIbs arani das roll 10_a
Ibs arani das roll 10_a
 
10120140502017
1012014050201710120140502017
10120140502017
 
Globalisation ppt 2
Globalisation ppt 2Globalisation ppt 2
Globalisation ppt 2
 
Industrial Economics(Elective Course)
Industrial Economics(Elective Course)Industrial Economics(Elective Course)
Industrial Economics(Elective Course)
 
Managing people in global market notes @ mba bec doms on hr
Managing people in global market notes @ mba bec doms on hrManaging people in global market notes @ mba bec doms on hr
Managing people in global market notes @ mba bec doms on hr
 
Literature On Foreign Direct Investment
Literature On Foreign Direct InvestmentLiterature On Foreign Direct Investment
Literature On Foreign Direct Investment
 
Globalisation
GlobalisationGlobalisation
Globalisation
 
Paper
PaperPaper
Paper
 

Mais de Pallav Chatterjee

Mais de Pallav Chatterjee (6)

Uncertainty Management
Uncertainty ManagementUncertainty Management
Uncertainty Management
 
Automotive Powertrain 2
Automotive Powertrain 2Automotive Powertrain 2
Automotive Powertrain 2
 
Supply Chain Disruption Study In Automotive Context
Supply Chain Disruption   Study In Automotive ContextSupply Chain Disruption   Study In Automotive Context
Supply Chain Disruption Study In Automotive Context
 
Toyota Case(2)
Toyota Case(2)Toyota Case(2)
Toyota Case(2)
 
Benetton Internationalization Strategy 2
Benetton Internationalization Strategy 2Benetton Internationalization Strategy 2
Benetton Internationalization Strategy 2
 
Indo Thailand Fta
Indo Thailand FtaIndo Thailand Fta
Indo Thailand Fta
 

Article Review Fdi

  • 1. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 Introduction With rapid advancement of global trade, FDI has been a subject of keen interest of research for scholars world-wide. The mentioned article studies in detail various researches which have been done on the subject of FDIs, the underlying patterns, their impact and the policy framework 1 suggestions on home country and host country governments. In order to absorb and examine the nuggets of useful information which the authors have presented it is important to have re- capitulation of the basic nature of FDI including the drivers of FDI, classification & impacts of FDI on a firm are required. In order to therefore examine the subject, the authors therefore propose to divide the following paper into seven sections 1. FDI : Firm specific drivers to internationalize. In this section we propose to discuss the key drivers that leads a firm to internationalize through FDI route. 2. FDI: Classification. We propose to understand the nature of FDI through classifying it as per various points-of-view which will help us to view FDI and its impact in different perspective. 3. Host Country Perspective. National Welfare, development of comparative advantages. 4. Home Country Perspective. Comparative Advantage and therefore welfare and enhancement of trade 5. Policy framework 6. Conclusions Authors: Pallav Vikash Chatterjee Debajyoti Saha
  • 2. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 Foreign Direct Investments (FDI): Firm specific drivers to internationalize The basic rationale for Foreign Direct Investments (or FDI) by any firm in global market economy is to increase and / or protect their profitability and /or capital value. One of the most common ways through which firms are achieving this goal is by engaging into FDI, either to better exploit their existing competitive advantages1 or to safeguard, increase or to add to these advantages. (UNCTAD, 2006) 2 Although there can be host of conditions of political & economic nature that drives the firms to invest in foreign countries, but often the three most important determinants drive the firms to engage in FDI. Firstly, it is the smallness of their home market. Through the path of growth of the firm and with increasing internal scale & scope economies, the firms no longer find themselves able to achieve those advantages within the boundaries of home country. This happens because of higher production surpluses vis-a-vis the home country demand they start seeking the cost economies by expanding outside the national boundaries. Though initially exports provides a logical extension of domestic business activities to exploit the scale economies and utilize the larger international demand, it becomes imperative very soon for the firm to engage in internalization of various foreign-based essential activities critical to expanding consumption of its goods and services in international markets. Key activities could be marketing, finance, distribution, supply chain & other such functions managing which, may become increasingly difficult & complex with increasing geographic, economic & political variations between country to country. With such growing complexities and increasing difficulties of control, the firms may seek internalization of such activities in foreign countries so as to complement its comparative advantages to expand the consumption and hence business of its goods and services. The most often used route to acquire control over these functions is by route of FDI, investing in these functions critical to further growth of their business. Till so far, we have been concerning ourselves regarding smallness of the home country from demand-side, however, supply-side smallness can also be a factor equally important triggering the firm to seek for seeking international assets by way of FDI. A very pertinent example could be that of Indian Multinational ONGC Videsh, a state owned firm which has acquired assets in countries in Central Asia for instance for the purpose of exploration of Oil & Natural-Gas resources. Due to smallness or lack of endowment of the home country in key resources (Human Resource, Technological Assets, Institutional frame-work, Infrastructural resources, Natural Resources and in some cases even Land, etc) the firm may seek to look beyond national boundaries to acquire these resources through or make itself available intermediate goods in upstream value-chain through acquiring strategic assets in foreign countries by way of investing through FDI. 1 Competitive advantage here refers to both Firm Specific Advantages as well as Comparative Advantage of the home country in terms of resource endowments and opportunity costs, as both FSA and Comparative Advantages enable the firm to compete profitably in foreign countries.
  • 3. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 Secondly, during the advanced phases of product-life-cycle (later phases of growth, shake-off, maturity & decline) the competitive pressures build upon the firm posing a threat to sustenance of their profitability. Under these stages of product life cycle, the firm finds the need of expanding outside the home country (Vernon, 1979). The important conclusion of this point of view had been that as the product progresses through the product-life-cycle the geographical location of firm specific activities with regard to the product changes. In the introduction phase when the product demand is small & the firm concentrates on its home market. But as it passes through the life-cycle, 3 getting increasingly matured, the firm increasingly learning on more efficient methods of production, scale economies rise, competition pressures build up with competition imitation of the processes & learning the proprietory knowledge that firm had earlier enjoyed, it becomes imperative for the firm to source its production from foreign countries with lesser costs of resources and maintain its advantage over competition. Thirdly and very importantly, Government too has a role to play in encouraging and driving the firms to internationally expand. A variety of drivers may encourage the firms to internationalize and engage in acquiring assets in foreign country and Government policy framework may facilitate to trigger the process. Government as an institution employs people whose job is to look out for the welfare of the state and protect the sovereignty of the nation. FDI in its both forms (inward and outward) is deeply interlinked with the both aspects of effective national governance; therefore by virtue of its role in the country, government plays an important role in both in-bound and out-bound FDI. With rapid growth of FDIs and its impact on host countries as well as home countries, the article examines the various policy stance being taken by governments to promote FDI, both outward as well as inward. However, the article mentions various ongoing debates and researches which are underway on these policy issues on impact of the benefit to the nations concerned. The FDI drivers/motivators can therefore be summarized in following table a) Cost or Competitive Advantage or Economic Factors – Desire to be near supply sources, low cost of labour, productivity of labour, costs and availability of raw materials, Transportation costs, other financial benefits, infrastructure availability, Agglomeration (or in other words External Economies of scale), Technology development, etc. ( see also World Investment Report, 1998) b) Market Factors – Position in product-life-cycle, market size & growth, desire to maintain market share, desire to follow customers, desire to follow or outshine competition, establish export base, networking with customer base, etc. (Vernon , 1979) c) Government Policy, Political & Environment Factors – Policy inducements / incentives, tax policy, exchange rate stability, government attitude towards FDI, SEZs, availability of LIS (Local Industrial Set-ups), etc.
  • 4. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 FDI: Nature & Classification Of the two types of investment flows between nations – Portfolio investment and foreign direct investment (FDI) – we are concerned primarily with FDI, because it is the ultimate stage of internationalization, and encompasses the widest range of international business development. FDI is the foreign entry strategy practiced by the most internationally active firms. Companies usually engage in FDI for the long term, and retain partial or complete ownership of the assets they acquire. 4 In event of a firm deciding to look for business opportunities outside its national boundaries, its choice of strategy comes down to one of the three approaches – Export, Contracting (Licensing or management contract) or Own and control assets abroad. It is the last entry choice which is popularly referred to as FDI. Therefore, FDI can be classified by way of choice of firms to enter an international market that can be by way through following modes. a) Joint Venture, which is primarily a collaborative & jointly owned approach with another firm with sharing of financial stakes, assets & investments. b) Majority Ownership (or Subsidiary) where the firm chooses to acquire assets wholly by itself either by way of Greenfield investment (building assets de novo) or acquiring a foreign asset by way of Mergers & Acquisitions. Generally it is observed that firms prefer merger & acquisitions over green field investments because M&A are quicker to execute. Another reason can be foreign target firms can have valuable strategic assets like trademarks or patents, brand loyalty, production systems, customer relationships, distribution systems and so on. Also acquiring firms believe that they can increase the efficiency of the acquired unit by transferring technology, capital or management skills. Primarily FDI is used for strategic activities, including : a) To set up manufacturing or assembly operations, or other physical facilities; b) To open a sales or representative office or other facility to conduct marketing or distribution activities; c) To establish a regional headquarters. In the process the firm establishes a new legal business entity, subject to the regulations of the host government. There has been dramatic growth of FDI into various world regions since the 1980s and the trend remains strong and, over time, is growing. The FDIs may be categorized on the basis of their source & destination countries, following classification holds well on that basis2 : 2 Detailed statistics of the extent and impact of various forms are available in World Investment Report, 2006, UNCTAD , Chapter III, pp. 105-139
  • 5. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 a. Developed Countries to Developed Countries b. Developed Countries to Developing Countries c. Developing Countries to Developed Countries d. Developing Countries to Developing Countries 5 The FDIs concerning the developing countries is one which is of keen interest of researchers in current day scenario as the volume of FDIs flowing out of developing countries have started growing rapidly and has grown on to almost $1.4 trillion or 13% of the total global outward FDI stock (UNCTAD, 2006). The FDI pattern of distribution in among the developing countries is illustrated in the graphical illustration 1. Graphical illustration 1 (Source : UNCTAD) FDI activities can even be classified based on firm’s motives for engaging in acquisition of foreign assets. These may be a) Resources seeking FDI : To serve local and regional demand. Reason for market-seeking FDI projects may be explained by the relative production and transaction costs of servicing markets through export or local production. Especially economies of scale, transportation costs, and exchange rates may influence the trade-off between exports and foreign production. Firms with low degrees of plant-level economies of scale and high transportation costs are more inclined to undertake market-seeking FDI projects. Need to stay closer to customers is another objective
  • 6. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 b) Market seeking FDI: Objective of resource seeking FDI is to exploit comparative advantages of the host country. Firms can allocate production resources in countries where factor prices are low relative to firm’s productivity. Another advantage may be access to raw materials, part and components. c) Knowledge seeking FDI: Such FDI projects are undertaken to maintain or develop a better competitive position in certain product or geographical markets. This competitive 6 position can be achieved by acquiring technological knowledge and capabilities and management expertise d) Efficiency seeking FDI: The purpose of efficiency seeking FDI projects is to rationalize the structure of established production units in such a way that a firm can benefit from the common governance of economic activities in different locations. Efficiency seeking FDI projects tend to occur in capital or technology intensive sectors in which the advantages of intra-industry and intra firm trade are the most prevalent. Firms in these sectors tend to differentiate their products as a form of competitive advantage. Potential benefits like economies of scale and economies of scope can be derived from product and geographical concentration and from process specialization. In efficiency-seeking FDI projects, the advantages of exploiting economies of scale and scope predominate over the importance of relative factor endowments across countries. e) Risk reduction seeking FDI: Risk reduction-seeking FDI projects are designed to reduce the corporate risk associated with unfavourable changes in macroeconomic variables, changes in supply and demand among national markets and the moves of competitors and of national and regional governments. These FDIs represent internal hedging activities conducted in order to reduce the level of corporate risk. Minimizing the firm’s exchange rate exposure is an important goal for risk reduction seeking FDIs. For instance, firms may handle exchange rate risk by moving production from unfavourable to favourable locations. The Trans-National Corporates (TNCs) therefore guided by above motive factors engage themselves in FDI in foreign countries, however eventually the decisions of engaging in FDI, with any of the motives as above eventually leads the firms to enhanced profitability, higher net present value of the future cash-flows & sustained competitive advantage which get possible to the firm as a whole through such investment decisions and these remains the essential benchmarks for them to evaluate the performance of the decision.
  • 7. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 Host Country Perspective : Concerns & Impact of Inward FDI Concerns Government concerns on MNE on national welfare & sovereignty Role of government is primarily concerned with national welfare and protection of sovereignty of the nation. Any external force or obstacle to these objectives are seen by the governments as 7 threat. However, in the case of interactions between the nation state and MNEs, the threat and so the reaction is also subtle as well. Governments worry that if MNEs gain control of strategic national assets and resources (e.g., oil, gas, metals, forests), they may not be able to control development of their own resources. In extreme cases governments might worry that they might be held hostage and forced to incur costs via lower taxes, or credits or subsidies provided to the MNE. For example, Saudi Arabia sought to ensure that Western oil firms had explicit plans to guarantee the transfer of technical capabilities to local employees, so that the foreign MNEs could not have an unacceptable level of influence over oil production in the country. Governments also view MNEs as potential threats to their independence if they become too strong as suppliers of critical resources Concerns about impact on domestic firms The competitive pressures on domestic firms can be too severe on country’s domestic firms due to technological, capital and human resource advantages. Although many governments do acknowledge that domestic firms need to adjust by either becoming more competitive or going out of existence, the political pressures however may be too high in order to provide for protection to domestic firms. Consequently research suggests governments are concerned about effects of FDI and MNEs particularly on two types of domestic firms. Firstly, the firms in declining industries where there may be structural reasons (for example, cheaper natural resources or labour in another country), that may be at the heart of the decline of a particular industry and beyond the control of the government. We see similar pressures on US textile and automobile industries, for example. Secondly, governments are worried about firms in promising and embryonic industries. New industries provide opportunity of income growth, higher productivities. FDI and MNE activities may have the ability to destroy domestic firms in emerging industries due to their higher scales and cost economies. In either cases government policies may not allow the MNEs to compete profitably in the host country. Concerns about hidden value Governments are concerned about MNEs hiding value. One of the most obvious such concerns are that the government have about MNEs is that they will hide profits and thereby avoid tax liability. Because of their global networks, MNEs can move the profits from a high tax-rate country to a low tax-rate country through fees and transfer pricing policies. While this may be attractive to MNEs but
  • 8. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 host governments may perceive this to be unfair and often illegal. Governments are also concerned that MNEs will hide value by keeping advanced technology out of their countries. MNEs may achieve this either by assigning low-technology tasks to operations within a certain country and by keeping high-value added activities and benefits from the local economy or MNEs can keep high technology by keeping high technology out the hands of local employees by assigning expatriate managers and technical specialists to the subsidiary. Consequently, governments employ policies that require high value-added technology to be incorporated into FDI proposals or limit the number, type and duration of expatriate employees. 8 Concerns about responsibility Governments also worry about the social responsibility of MNEs. To the extent that MNEs are viewed as “temporary” visitors in countries, with no long-term commitment to raising the standard of living of citizens, governments worry about these firms exploiting opportunities and not being around for longer-term negative consequences. For example, governments worry about MNEs in natural resource extraction industries taking resources in the most economically efficient means possible with little regard for environment consequences, worker safety, or societal health and welfare. If disasters happen the individuals responsible may escape the arms of local justice or even may be transferred out of the country by the MNE before the government can assess responsibility, of the MNE may simply protect the people at headquarters who were responsible for formulating and implementing the decisions that led to the disaster and its consequences. This issue, for example is central to the continuing dispute of between Union Carbide and the government of India concerning the Bhopal tragedy. Impact and benefits to host economy Economic cost benefit (Mathematical approach) More often than not a government might not simply view the benefit of FDI in terms of the cash- flow projections of an MNE engaging in FDI into the nation. In a competitive and free market economy where there is no restriction on information, prices, entry barriers, both MNEs and government can use the same sets of projections as measures of benefit to both the MNEs and the society. However, externalities may exist which may restrict the free competitive market structure and as a result there may happen to be price controls, wage restrictions , subsidies, tariffs, taxes and other imperfections distorting values and therefore the cash flow projections of MNEs no longer project the true value (or opportunity cost) of a resource to the society. As a consequence, the government’s perspective of looking at an FDI proposal may vary from that of an MNE. As a common approach governments look at maximization of national income as economic implication of FDI. For looking at the benefits that accrue to the host economy, the governments of host economies therefore use variety of tools to appraise the benefits to the economy from inward flow of FDI. These tools may be Benefit-Cost Ratio, Present value of costs and benefits, Shadow price adjustments and time-context based value.
  • 9. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 a) Benefit-cost ratio The basic benefit cost ratio may be expressed as follows [{F+R*+T} – O + N] / E Where F = the local factor payments that the MNE pays to labour, management and land (wages, salary & rent) R* = the after tax payments to local capital (profits, dividends, interest) 9 O = opportunity cost of local factors N = net external economies, these are spill-over effects of benefit on local economy which can be positive ( forcing domestic firms to adopt better quality, lower prices, higher employment, etc) or negative (structural unemployment or discouragement of local entrepreneurs) E = payments to external factors of production including technology (profits, dividends, interest, royalties, management fees, and so on that gets transferred out of the country) b) Present Value of costs and benefits To calculate present value of streams of flow of costs and benefits that occur over a period of time an appropriate discount rate needs to be applied. However, because private and social values differ in a situation of market imperfections, the private and social discount rates also differ. An MNE will select an appropriate discount rate which will be risk adjusted and that may equal to the marginal opportunity costs of its capital (FDI invested) adding a risk premium to account for political risks. Government however, will seek to maximize the income effects on the economy by the proposed FDI and therefore select a discount rate that will reflect the marginal productivity of capital in its economy. Since governments are always under pressure for accumulating foreign exchange, controlling inflation or reducing unemployment, they will tend to assign higher discount value to near-term benefits than longer term benefits while appraising a proposal of FDI. c) Shadow price adjustments and benefit – cost analysis Shadow prices are intended to measure accurately the opportunity costs of various inputs and the utility of the outputs to the society. In determining the revenue benefit to the firm, the MNE would simply calculate the nominal sales expected to be generated. The value of these outputs to the society can differ from the MNE’s estimate. If the output is import substituting then the value of the output is the same as the value of the imports and vary from the MNEs simple calculation of nominal sales because of reasons like import tariffs that makes the domestic prices differing from the import prices (world prices). Export-generating output also very similarly is to be valued on the basis of world market price rather than domestic price. In addition to these adjustments, specially in countries with
  • 10. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 fixed exchange rate regimes or policy intervention framework in exchange rates, a necessary correction needs to be made on basis of shadow-exchange-rate (unofficial exchange rate) that may determine the real value of the output in domestic currency terms. In many cases domestic currency is overvalued or undervalued under policy interventions, in such cases the real value of the costs / benefits of the FDI in foreign currency terms should be translated to local currency terms using the unofficial shadow-exchange-rate that determines more accurately the real value of the currency and therefore the benefit or the cost of the activity to the society. 10 d) Time-context based value of the benefit-cost to the society During the first few years after the firm has engaged in FDI, the firms would usually expect lower cash-flows or profits. During the course of these initial years, extent of inward investments would be higher, when the firm (MNE) will be building up capacities, transferring technologies, provide employment by recruiting staff / labour, providing training to local manpower, etc. During these early years there will be efforts from the firm to build higher scales to ensure economies in costs. However, over a period of time these inflows will reduce in a continuum as the FDI project matures and the benefits to the firm increase with growing scales. However, on the contrary government (society) may perceive the benefits higher in the initial years and the perception of benefit of the FDI may reduce with passage of time as the inward flow of these economic benefits continue to reduce. The phenomenon is illustrated in figure 2 exhibited below. This phenomenon may create a zone of disagreement between benefit perception to the firm and the benefit perception to the host economy (society or government). Graphical Illustration 2 Apart from the above concerns and divergent views of appraisal of FDI benefits and costs to the society in economic value terms it is well known to have positive benefits of FDI on host economy. The benefits to the host country can be summarized as below.
  • 11. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 a) Primary contributions. These may include following • Lower price due to competitive advantage of parent MNEs. • Higher quality & differentiation • Inflow of additional resources – Capital, Technology & Management skills which raise the efficiency and volumes of domestic output • Export enhancement – specially in case of FDI in export oriented units, 11 where the MNEs invest to exploit resources in host country to provide for intermediate inputs to its various facilities in global network. The benefit even accrues in case of finished good exports by MNEs (for instance small cars from India, computers & electronic goods from China). MNEs may benefit by achieving cost and competitive advantages due to technological or factor cost advantages from the host economy while host economy benefits in income growth through export enhancement. • Agglomeration effects – FDI in economically laggard areas, if directed through conscious policy and institutional framework support by local government may have a spiralling virtuous effect of developing external scale economies and local entrepreneurship in order to develop agglomeration effects & hence rise in the economic welfare and growth of the area in the host economy. This may be achieved where FDI by MNEs may be attracted where MNEs benefit by lower factor costs, availability of specific input resources and government incentives and subsidies. Early start in such cases or import restrictions on certain goods and services which are governed by external scale economies, may provide this form of welfare advantage to the host economy. The MNE may bring in technological expertise, develop SMEs & suppliers, support industries in the agglomeration as a result of the FDI. b) Secondary benefits • Production enhancement: The MNE may benefit the host economy by providing demand of inputs from the local suppliers. For instance, local auto component suppliers for a car company. • Demand Creation: There can be instances when the MNE creates demands for goods for its subsidiary in the host country in world market (or home country market for the parent firm) for the parent firm units to source critical supplies.
  • 12. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 c) Externalities • Enhancing productivity of host country firms through introduction of new technologies, opening international channels of sourcing for more efficient supplies of input goods etc. • Foreign investors provide host country firms that originate as suppliers 12 new opportunities to become producer of goods/services to other buyers in the international economy. For example, Malaysian machine tool firms that originated selling equipment and services to INTEL in Malaysia follow the MNC to China, and begin to sell equipment and services to US, Europe, and Japanese firms in Chinese market.
  • 13. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 Home Country Perspective : Outward FDI FDIs have positive effects on the home country (originating country), some of these advantages have been reported by firms as per UNCTAD survey (see Graphical illustration 3 at the end of the section), to be market expansion, efficiency gains, obtaining strategic assets, access to natural resources and financial gain. Principally, outward FDI helps the home country to utilize its comparative advantage and maximize welfare through mobility of factors and by the effects of specialization. FDI may form 13 an alternative to productive specialization through trade when there are constraints that limit trade to actually take place. These restrictions to trade may trigger mobility of factor (capital resources) and encourage flow of capital from home country in form of FDI. Among variety of such reasons, few particularly important are as follows: a) High transportation costs relative to the value of the output of production limiting the effects of benefits of trade. Transportation cost is a function of weight, volume, distance and haulage of transportation carriers involved in transportation of goods. In the cases of goods with low value to weight or value to volume ratios, the transportation cost therefore, will constitute to very high proportion to the final price of the goods sold renderring the opportunity cost advantage irrelevant while competing with other sources of supplies of such goods which are geographically nearer to the final point of consumption. Mineral ores – bauxite or iron ore are such examples. Therefore in order to retain and protect the comparative advantage firms may seek to internalize the specific production processes or resources leading to such goods in the host countries which are either themselves the target markets for consumption or nearer to the points of consumption. This way the firms tend to gain through specialization in the products and processes where they have comparative advantage. b) Higher factor rewards for capital also encourage the firms from the home countries to engage in FDI. For instance reward for capital (rent, profits, dividends, interest etc) encourage the firms to shift capital to the host country where the rewards are higher, thereby taking advantage of the endowment of that specific factor (capital) to gain higher rewards in form of rent, profits, dividends and interests. c) MNEs may have factor specific advantages like efficient production processes (factor combinations, production technologies, Intellectual Property Rights). In order to acquire competitive advantage to compete in global markets efficiently they may require other factors of production at most economic opportunity costs, which may not be available in the home country. Therefore this triggers the MNE to engage in FDI in order to internalize low factors available at comparatively lower opportunity costs in the host countries (for instance cheap labour, raw materials etc). This explains movement of FDI from developed countries to developing countries having lower cost of labour, raw materials, natural resources etc.
  • 14. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 d) Need for acquisition of technology & efficient production know-how: FDI may also be directed from the home country to acquire technological advantages, advantages of production know-how, efficient production technologies optimizing right mix of inputs to production. This mainly happens in case of FDI originating from LDCs (Less Developed Countries) or emerging markets (South – North FDI, UNCTAD). Such lack of technological advantage may restrict the home country to promote trade and maximize their societal welfare; FDI in such cases maximizes trade opportunities. 14 In addition to above the effect of FDI on the home country can also be on the local business environment of the home economy (point of origin economy of FDI). It refers to subcontracting relations and local externalities induced by the demand for specialized inputs, services, managerial and operative skills and it has to do with supporting firm’s employment effect. In such contexts production in foreign affiliates can induce two effects - firstly, substitutive effect of employment in local context in which the MNE operates due to (i) reduction of domestic low skilled labor, (ii) loss of market shares by local suppliers, loss of opportunity to grow and learn through the relationship with parent firm, (iii) write-off of previous sub contracting relations. This can even happen secondly due to complementary effects which occur whenever the enhanced competitive position of the parent company and its additional demand for specialized inputs do increase the externalities on the local context. Transfer of production abroad may have a positive effect when parent company’s suppliers become suppliers for foreign affiliates. In such a case market for suppliers expands. Resource seeking FDI can induce upgrading in local system and in supply chain competitiveness by promoting differentiation in specialization and competencies between countries. Graphical Illustration 3
  • 15. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 Policy Framework The article discusses at length on the debates over policy framework issues under practice which necessarily the Host country should bring into force and what are the possible effects of those policies on overall effectiveness in promoting national welfare, protection and enhancement of competitive and comparative advantage. 15 Trend The article mentions that there is a current trend by the host countries to incentivize FDI directly or indirectly. Under direct measures of incentivization, there is exemption of taxes, direct subsidies, etc while under indirect measures governments are facilitating FDI through cheaper allocation of resources in the home country like allocating land in SEZs at cheaper rates etc. While the article mentions that incentivization of FDI (directly or indirectly) by any means is not the only or best strategy to adopt, but this has been mainly due to the “prisoners’ dilemma” effect arising due to nations competing against each other to attract FDI in their respective countries. We have analyzed the perception of benefits & concerns of inward FDI from the host-country government perspective, where we have concluded that the perceived benefit from FDI to the host government is the largest in the initial legs of the investment from the benefit-cost point of view. However, over time as the MNE investing in the country gains scale advantages, the perceived benefit to the host government slowly starts declining, when there are slowing inflow of benefits in terms of capital in-flow, know-how, technology or employment over the period of time with increasing zone of disagreement between the respective benefits perceived by the host country and the MNE (reference graphical illustration 2, page no. 10). This indicates that from policy point of view the host-country governments should not only consider the benefit of FDI in terms of short- term impact to the host economy but longer-term benefits that could be derived upon. Any policy framework that enables to benefit the society in longer term and also benefitting the MNE investing in the country would be the most beneficial policy stand which a government should take. As in the previous section we have considered the short term benefit-cost consideration as in terms of benefits net off all costs (opportunity costs, costs factor payments flowing out of the country), the government should also consider the gains to the economy in enhancing welfare through increased productivity, absorptive capacities of local firms, entrepreneurship development, agglomeration benefits etc triggering from the FDI flowing in. Any policy stand that can help attracting FDI and benefit the host country in such a fashion should be benefitting the economy the most. Therefore, any policy framework that focuses on attractive FDI only through incentives could therefore stands a risk of being a “myopic” policy and such short sighted policy framework may not result the host-economy to gain maximum advantage from inflow of foreign capital through FDI. The article points out debates on the benefits of FDI on developing local industries in Ireland and similar such places where incentives have formed the central part of the strategy to attract FDI.
  • 16. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 FDI Incentive Policies On the expectation that MNCs will raise employment, exports, or tax revenue, or that some of the knowledge brought by the foreign companies may spill over to the host country private sector, many governments have also introduced various forms of investment incentives, to encourage foreign owned companies to invest in their jurisdiction. 16 There have been numerous such examples of incentivization by governments to attract inward FDI, some such notable examples are as below. Governments of Britain and France competed with each other on the incentives they offered Toyota to invest in their respective countries. Kentucky in United States offered Toyota an incentive package worth $112 million to persuade it to build its US automobile assembly plants there. The package included tax breaks, new state spending on infrastructure, and low-interest loans. British government provided an estimated $30,000 and $50,000 per employee to attract Samsung & Siemens respectively to the North East of England in 1990s. These incentives can take the following forms - Tax holidays – Low direct (corporate, income tax) or indirect taxes (excise, value added tax etc) - Preferential tariffs - Special Economic Zones / Export Processing Zones - Financial subsidies on investment - Soft loans / loan guarantees - Free land, assets or Infrastructure or alternatively subsidies in such investments. - Job training or employment subsidies - R&D subsidies - Derogation from regulations Are FDI incentives justified? Host countries apply these measures considering the positive benefits of FDI on the host country and with the consideration of spill-over effects of FDI on welfare like employment creation, learning of best practices & efficient methods of production by the domestic industries.
  • 17. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 These incentives are therefore extended to the MNEs investing in the host-country considering the superiority in terms of foreign firms over the domestic ones in terms of efficiencies, productivities & technology. So far we have discussed how government incentives and policies attract FDI inflows. But it needs to be investigated whether these incentives are justified. These will be justified only if the host nation is subjected to welfare effects resulting out of FDI inflows. Otherwise these incentives are not worth 17 taking. FDIs are expected to generate spillovers which mean the positive effects/benefits emanating from FDI, which go beyond the direct benefits. Foreign MNCs may: Contribute to efficiency by breaking supply bottlenecks Introduce new know-how by demonstrating new technologies and training workers who later take employment in local firms Improve allocative efficiency by entering into industries with high entry barriers and reducing monopolistic distortions. Also stimulates competition and efficiency Transfer techniques for inventory and quality control and standardization to their local suppliers and distribution channels. Force local firms to increase their quality managerial efforts or to adopt some managerial and marketing techniques used by MNC. Enhance productivity of local firms with knowledge/technology transfer Force domestic firms to modernize by imposing on them minimum standards of quality, delivery dates , prices, etc in their supplies of parts and raw materials However, the article cautions over those policies of FDI attraction (like for instance Incentives) without considering the implied benefits of such FDIs, may be detrimental to the welfare of the host- country. The benefits of inward FDI, for instance is through the absorptive capacities of the local firms, to gain from the spillover effects of inward FDI. If the absorptive capacities of the local firms are low or if the structure of the home economy is such that it cannot maximize the learning advantages from inward FDI, attracting FDI through incentives may cause welfare reduction. The article therefore criticizes such forms of FDI attraction policies on essentially because of folllowing issues a) There are variety of factors that facilitates or restricts the absorptive effects of local firms (learning of best management practices, productivity enhancement etc). Therefore if the inward-FDI is promoted through FDI without due-considerations to those factors which may restrict the absorption by local firms, It may amount to unjustified discriminatory way of reinforcing competitive advantage against domestic producers affecting local industries and therefore reduction of welfare to the host-country economy. b) It may have international crowding out effects. International crowding out effect is expansionary fiscal policies of government due to high incentivization expenses may result in
  • 18. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 hardening of interest rates, appreciation of local currency affecting exports and therefore undermining the accelerator benefits of Government spending on domestic GDP growth. c) De Propris et al., suggest that incentivizing FDI in Local industrial systems (LIS) is unnecessary unless there are laggard agglomerations (backward areas), as there will be no significant benefit to the welfare of the host-country through absorptive effects of FDI on local firms. d) From various studies it has been concluded that the LCs who are predominantly MNEs or at least who are involved in exports (trade) have greater absorptive capacity than their purely 18 local counterparts. Therefore instead of just considering policy measures to attract inward FDIs, therefore there should be policy adopted for promotion of both inward and outward FDI, which may create maximum welfare through increased absorptive capacities of home- grown MNEs or micro MNEs (SMEs who are internationalizing). Therefore considering above, a more holistic view should be taken by the host governments towards inward FDI, which may help maximizing economic welfare.
  • 19. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 Conclusions FDI according to Dunning emerges due to ownership, internalization and locational advantages. Foreign companies will be attracted to the host country if it can seek significant locational advantages in the host country. But with rising pressures of globalization induced competitiveness, the locational advantages based on only the economic conditions may not be able to sustain their strength of attracting FDI. Possessing the principal determinants like 19 market size, real income levels, skill levels, infrastructure and other resources, favorable trade policies and macroeconomic stability may not be sufficient for the host countries to attract FDI. For this matter focus now has shifted to government policies in addition to economic conditions as determinant of FDI. In furtherance, rather than only to concentrate on pulling FDI, if spill-over effects of FDI are not maximized, the activity may bear no fruit of welfare for the economy. Therefore government policies should also be directed inwards towards enhancement of comparative advantages, developing new specializations through development of entrepreneurship, development of specialized agglomerations, development of productivity of factors of production, skill enhancement of local labour, acquisition of new technologies etc. Therefore Government policies should be two pronged, one with a pull strategy which should incorporate attracting FDI through maximizing the Ownership, Locational or Internalization advantages of investing MNEs on other hand it should be directed towards enhancing domestic competition, absorptive capacities of local firms, and development of home-grown MNEs. Pull strategy a) Overall economic policy that increases locational advantages for FDI by improving following economic fundamentals of the host country: Market size: Large market size generates scale economies while growing market improves market potential and attracts FDI. Cost factors: Includes cost of labor, cost of capital and infrastructure costs. Lower wage rates, availability of skilled labor aids FDI. Also lower interest rates increases domestic consumption leading to more FDI inflows. Higher the infrastructure present, lower is infrastructure costs and more will be FDI inflows. Real exchange rates: Foreign investors seem to gain from devalued exchange rate of the host country. They may gain due to larger buying power in host countries. Also they can produce more cheaply and export more easily.
  • 20. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 Macroeconomic stability: Macroeconomic variables like inflation, budget, balance of payments affect FDI inflows. For instance exchange rate can adversely affect the competitiveness of the plants in different countries. Stability of exchange rates of the currency in host country encourage investment by foreign firms as it increases uncertainty regarding the future economic and business prospects of the host country. 20 Overall economic stability: Financial health of the host economy is capture by the ratio of external debts to exports. It is expected that lower this ratio higher is the probability of economic stability in the country. Resulting in more FDI inflows. b) National FDI policies reduce transaction costs of foreign firms entering the economy: Tariff policies: FDI is deterred by the high tariffs or non tariff barriers on imported inputs and is attracted to more open economies. Higher openness to trade to attract higher FDI inflows. Policies can be categorized into: Fiscal incentives: Reduces tax burden of a firm. It includes tax concessions in the form of reduction of the standard corporate income-tax rate, tax holidays, depreciation allowances on capital taxes, exemption from import duties and duty drawbacks on exports. It also includes provision of guarantee for repatriation of investments and profits and establishing mechanisms for settlements of investment disputes. Financial incentives: These include grants, subsidized loans and loan guarantees, publicly funded venture capital and government insurance at preferential rates. c) Removal of restrictions: Due to the enforcement of TRIMS (Trade Related Investment Measures) many restrictions were eliminated, with removal of such restrictions FDI flows are maximized. Entry barriers Ownership & control restrictions Allowing only fixed portion of foreign owned capital in an enterprise Compulsory joint ventures Mandatory transfer of ownership to local private firms over a period of time Restrictions on reimbursements of capital upon liquidation Restrictions on employment of foreign key personnel, and performance requirements, sourcing, training requirements, export targets.
  • 21. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 d) Development of institutional framework Institutional framework which facilitates smooth and transparent establishment of new businesses that may facilitate MNEs to smoothly establish their business activities Reforms in licenses, permissions required to establish businesses. Education / Technical skill bases – to provide adequate pool of skilled local labour 21 resources Corruption or Graft – ensuring transparencies in local governance, enhancing investors’ confidence on local business environment and thereby reducing their perceptions of political risks associated with the FDI. Well developed labour policies - trade-unionism, weak labour policies etc in long run have negative impact on investor confidence. Due to non adequate legislations in place on such issues, there are frequent unrests, issues that interrupt regular business & add to the costs to the MNE in investing. Therefore strong legal & institutional framework on such issues helps the MNEs scale the host-country highly on business environment attractiveness. Basile (2004) notes that existence of public research and business services can be used to attract FDIs by MNEs. These existing institutions in the host-country maximizes the locational & cost advantages for the MNEs. Maximization of domestic welfare Spillover (benefits) effects of FDI from MNEs may happen in variety of forms – technological, entrepreneurial, productivity, wages etc. Therefore these policies should act complementarily along with the strategies meant to pull FDI. Development of R&D investments to bridge technological gap and therefore enhance spillover effects (Bellak & Nuran) Research suggests geographic proximity as in agglomeration enhances the possibility of spillover effects. Therefore creation of local agglomeration with advantages of external scales of economies which may attract FDI on one hand and on other enhance welfare through spillover effects of FDI. De-propris et al., suggests that there are difficulties in embeddedness of MNEs in clusters due to variety of road-blocks like difficulty in grasping the governance mechanism, idiosyncratic coordination, and adjust to the collective learning system. That is why Piscitello & Rabbiosi provided a practical but controversial suggestion of promoting acquisitions in clusters as already existing firms are more or less embedded in the system and therefore FDI through acquisition by MNEs would accelerate the positive spillover effects.
  • 22. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 De Backer and Sleuwaegen support the development of a techno-economic infrastructure aimed at clustering foreign and domestic investments, allied to policies designed to stimulate technological development and international exploitation of technological advantages. These are considered as the best options for the successful development of a sustainable industrial base. While such measures increase the likelihood of spillovers, the authors indicate that there is no guarantee that they will happen automatically. Since studies suggest that presence of domestic MNEs enhances the absorptive 22 capacities, Durán and Úbeda envisage an important role for public policy in stimulating the inward-outward investment dynamic, and that Government action should occur at various levels (short-term, long-term, general and specific, promoting LAs but also the development of Firm Specific Advantages or FSAs in other words, in companies based in their jurisdiction). They further suggest incentives for investments in R&D, technical collaborations and alliances to enhance the absorptive capacity of local firms
  • 23. Article Review : FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies 2011 Review of article - FDI and Multinationals: Patterns, Impacts and Policies, A. T. Tavares and S. Young, Int. J. of the Economics of Business, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2005, pp. 3–16 Bibliography 1. UNCTAD , World Investment Report 2006, Chapter IV, pp. 142 2. Vernon, Raymond, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 41 (November 1979): 255-267 3. Course Materials 4. Web Resources (Wikipedia) 23