ENoLL event, May 16th, 2011.

1. ENOLL AND THE FUTURE
INTERNET PPP

2. CONTENTS
¤ Positioning Living Lab research in the European
Future Internet Development
¤ The Role of the Living Labs in implementing the Digital
Agenda
¤ The First Steps: FI PPP & CONCORD
¤ The Next Steps ENOLL PPP

3. WHY FOCUS ON FUTURE INTERNET?
¤ Future Internet is a core infrastructure in society,
a backbone for smarter cities and regions
¤ Novel societal and commercial usages are challenging
the original Internet architecture
¤ Increased urgency to:
¤ Assume systems perspective and analyze the market impacts
¤ Prioritise visions and research directions in ICT
¤ Accumulate critical mass and engage wider communities
¤ Align and work across Work Programs and Calls

4. ROADMAP TOWARDS DIGITAL ECONOMY
¤ Digital Single Market
¤ Openness and interoperability even in absence of
standards
¤ Increased online trust and security
¤ Internet for all through improved coverage
¤ Funds for innovation and ICT research
¤ Digital inclusion
¤ Digital public services

5. VISION OF CITIES AS THE SYSTEMS OF SYSTEMS

6. IMPLEMENTATION BARRIERS FOR THE DIGITAL ECONOMY

7. LIVING LABS -CATALYSTS OF SYSTEMIC INNOVATION
Targets
of
Innovation:
Single
Product
/
Service
Organization Company
P/S
P/S P/S
Network
of
Companies
or
Industry Company
Company
Systemic
level P/S P/S
P/S
Company
Company
P/S P/S
P/S
Companies
/industry
Techno-­‐ Academia
logies
Ministries
Public Legal Educational Cities
&
establish-­‐ Municipalities
organizations framework
ments
Public
People
Development Funding
(user
represen-­‐
Market tatives) Organizations Org’s

8. EC APPROACH TO FUTURE INTERNET DEVELOPMENT
Technology Risk
FP7
-­‐
longer-­‐term
R&D
FP7/Future
Internet
-­‐
integra/on
of
new
PPP
ICT
&
new
ideas
CIP/
ICT
PSP
-­‐
market
oriented
R&D
-­‐open
plaAorms
and
-­‐
cost-­‐efficiency
-­‐
large
scale
trials
interoperability
-­‐
service
innova/on
-­‐
common
enablers
-­‐
adapta/on
to
specific
-­‐
Societal
benefits
demands
Piloting deployment 2-3 years 5-10 years
Time to Market

9. FI PPP ADDRESSING THE IDENTIFIED CHALLENGES
¤ Builds upon and complement existing efforts in FI research
¤ Bridges the gap between
¤ Private and public interests,
¤ Demand and supply side stakeholders,
¤ The technology development, deployment and commercialisation
¤ Led by industry and driven by users
¤ Break down the proprietary barriers between different
applications, platforms and sectors
¤ Address regulatory and legal barriers, drives policy

10. FI PPP PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION
Three-phased approach with open calls

11. CONCORD
COORDINATION AND COLLABORATION FACILITATION FOR THE NEXT GENERATION FI PPP
¤ FI.ICT-2011.1.10 Programme Facilitation and Support
project
¤ Consortium with strong background in Living Lab and
Smart City experimentation
¤ Applying the frameworks and principles of organizing,
managing and governing multi-stakeholder open
innovation networks learned in the CIP projects
¤ Advocate open innovation, early user involvement,
SME engagement and links to related initiatives

12. CONCORD PARTNERS
Ø Aalto University (Aalto)
Ø The Interdisciplinary institute for Broad Band Technology (IBBT)
Ø Tieto- ja Viestintäteollisuuden Tutkimus Oy (TIVIT)
Ø European Institute of Interdisciplinary Research (EIIR)
Ø European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL)
Ø European Regions Research and Innovation Network (ERRIN)
Ø DOCOMO Euro Labs

13. CONCORD MISSION
Ø The CONCORD supports the European Commission in the
successful implementation of a coherent FI PPP programme
Ø CONCORD coordinates and facilitate the alignment of FI PPP
activities to ensure the continuous relevance, rigor and
robustness of the co-created Future Internet concepts, visions
and roadmaps.
Ø Strongly emphasizes linkages to other ongoing initiatives and the
early involvement of demand side actors

14. CONCORD MAIN RESULTS
Ø A coordination and decision-making framework for collaboration
between projects
Ø A process by which to coordinate horizontal foundation and vertical
sectors’ activities and roadmaps
Ø A knowledge exchange strategy and process for socio-technical
impact creation
Ø Supporting elements for the implementation and uptake of FI
services

15. CONCORD IMPACT
i) Accelerated development of experimental infrastructures for large-
scale trials
ü providing a comprehensive approach towards functionalities and non-technical
aspects (e.g. interoperability, openness, standards, data security and privacy)
ii) Accelerated evolution of Future Internet infrastructure and ensured
system compatibility
ü emergence of open, secure and trusted service platform and scalable networked
applications through coordination and joint specifications
iii) Increased effectiveness and alignment of activities
ü management of interdependencies, defining a use rights for platform use
iv) Increased economic service sustainability
ü novel business models, cross-sector industrial partnerships & early user involvement

16. CONTRIBUTION TO THE STATE OF THE ART
v) Increased diversity
ü empowering digital entrepreneurship by providing SME players with opportunities
to offer new products, equipments, services and applications
vi) Reinforced focus on transnational FI development drivers
ü bringing in outside in view to the programme
vii) Improved ease of collaboration by user friendly FI PPP portal
ü User friendly FI PPP portal including partner and project search functionalities and
knowledge resources
iix) Increased impact and linkages with global and national initiatives
ü joint activities and a programme level dissemination regime

17. ADDED VALUE FOR THE COMMUNITY
Ø Advancing FI PPP implementation through the identification, articulation,
recommendation and consensus-building on the identified technical and
non-technical enablers for FI PPP
Ø Increased stability and sustainability of the communities
Ø Ensuring and facilitating the participation of SME’s, (user) communities
and citizens in addition to the incumbent players
Ø Tools, frameworks and open platforms for stakeholder cooperation
Ø Increased visibility of the projects outcome and possible use cases
Ø Bridging gaps in research and policies
Ø Networking and exchanging information concerning FI PPP

18. CONCORD SERVICES
European
Commission
Policy/decision
making
level
Advisory
Board
Chair
PPP
Steering
Board
¤ Coordination of the FI PPP Management Architecture
Board
European
Commission
PPP
Secretariat
PPP
Working
Groups
¤ Joint Dissemination Strategy
PPP
Programme
Office
¤ Facilitation of thematic Working Groups
¤ Events and Communications
¤ Community engagement
¤ Community portal at www.fi-ppp.eu
¤ Presentations and Templates

19. HOW TO GET INVOLVED?
¤ Community portal at www.fi-ppp.eu
¤ Events:
¤ JUN
6,
2011
European
Summit
on
the
Future
Internet,
LUXEMBOURG
hUp://www.future-­‐internet.uni.lu/
¤ JUN
6-­‐9,
2011
Internet
of
Things
Week,
BARCELONA
www.iot-week.eu/2011
¤ JUN
14,
2011
5th
Future
Internet
Cluster
Workshop,
WARSAW
hUp://www.isgtw.org/event/5th-­‐future-­‐internet-­‐cluster-­‐workshop
¤ JUN
28-­‐29,
2011
3rd
Usage
Area
workshop,
BRUSSELS
hUp://ini/a/ve.future-­‐internet.eu/events/3rd-­‐usage-­‐area-­‐workshop.html
¤ SEP
12-­‐16,
2011
Future
Internet
Symposium,
BERLIN
hUp://www.fis2011.org/
¤ SEP
27-­‐29,
2011
4th
NEM
Summit,
TORINO
hUp://nem-­‐summit.eu/
¤ OCT
24-­‐26
24.-­‐26.10.2011
Future
Internet
Assembly,
POZNAN
hUp://www.future-­‐internet.eu/events/eventview/ar/cle/future-­‐internet-­‐assembly-­‐poznan.html
¤ NOV
7-­‐8,
2011
Global
Forum,
BRUSSELS
hUp://www.items.fr/spip.php?rubrique110

20. HOW TO GET INVOLVED?
The Future Calls:
¤ Call 2 Identifier: FP7-2012-ICT-FI (18 May – 28 October 2012) –
budget 80 MEuro
• Use Case Scenarios Pilots – Phase 2 (5 areas, 13.5 MEuro, 2
years)
• Capacity Building (one IP, 12.5 MEuro, 2 years)
¤ Call 3 Identifier: FP7-2013-ICT-FI (December 2013) – budget 130
MEuro
• Devoted to the expansion and enlargement of many testbeds and
pilots (several areas, ~100 MEuro, 2 years)

21. THANK YOU!
Petra Turkama
Aalto University
Petra.turkama@aalto.fi
www.fi-ppp.eu
CONCORD@Projects-ckir.fi

22. • The project will advance interdisciplinary knowledge on the links
between the socio-ecological transition and growth as well as the
role of innovation.
¤ Transformation to post-industrial era: from transaction theory and
resource based view to dynamic cababilities paradigm and actor
network theories
¤ Discover how, where and when societal and economic value is
generated for the various stakeholders in these networks.
• It will achieve a critical mass of resources and involve relevant
communities, stakeholders, and practitioners enhancing the
development of an improved research agenda for innovative social
services and better instruments for innovation and coordinated social
and economic governance in the EU.

23. ¤ Close networking with ongoing FIRE, Living Lab and
Policy initiatives
¤ Identify and analyze representative cases of policy or
functional innovations
¤ Generalize and Theorize relevant aspects for wider
adaptation
¤ Disseminate effectively through various communities
and channels

24. • Innovation network
Set of distinct institutions which jointly and individually
contribute to the development and diffusion of new
technologies and which provides the framework within
which governments form and implement policies to
influence the innovation process. As such it is a
system of interconnected institutions to create, store
and transfer the knowledge, skills and artefacts which
define new technologies.” (Metcalfe, 1995)

25. ¤ Presenting innovative solutions for structural reforms and fiscal policies for income
distribution, economic growth, negative impacts of Globalisation
¤ Providing sustainable means to influence global trends towards new socio-ecological
development paths
ADDRESSING CALL OBJECTIVES
¤ Proposal for a process for the Member States and the EU to adapt and coordinate
their research, innovation and industrial policies towards the socio-ecological
transition
¤ Presenting best practices in combining technological, economic and social
innovations with focus on economic efficiency, their social equity and their
environmental performance
¤ Proposing new sectors that may develop alongside the socio-ecological transition
¤ Assessment of ICT contribution to the achievement of the economic, social and
environmental objectives
¤ Presenting sectoral analysis for the evaluation of economic, social and environmental
regulations and organisations needed for the socioecological transition
¤ Analyzing the specific challenges for the urban, peri-urban and rural areas concerning
the locations of work and leisure, habitat, landscape and infrastructure
¤ Defining the cultural contexts of the socio-ecological transition
¤ Applying interdisciplinary analyses (economics, sociology, history, philosophy,
anthropology)to the collective meanings of "well-being”

26. • Extension of systems-oriented theory and research in the economics of
innovation
APPLIED SYSTEMS OF INNOVATION
• A non-linear interdisciplinary perspective relevant to formation of innovation
policy
APPROACH
• Considers systems of innovation as evolutionary systems, performative view
of knowledge
• Particularly to demand side instruments
• Systems oriented approach emphasizing interdependency and interactive
learning
• Incremental innovation process with feedback and trials
• Employ historical perspectives
• Emphasize the central role of institutions
• Stress comparisons instead of (sub)optimization of systems
Sectoral
Innova/on
Systems
• Presents conceptual frameworks rather than formal theories
• Direct implications to the development of corporate strategies and public
Na/onal
Innova/on
Systems
policies
Regional
Innova/on
Systems
Levels of Analysis

27. RESEARCH DOMAINS
Alignment,
Coordina/on
Demand
Side
Supply
Side
Concept
for
socio-­‐technical
regimes:
Systems-­‐oriented
approach
to
supply
side
Technological,
Science,
Policy,
Socio-­‐ Socio-­‐technical
real-­‐life
experiments
to
cultural,
User
and
Market
accelerate
adapta/on
Instruments:
Interplay
of
the
actors:
User-­‐involvement,
openess
-­‐Cultural
and
contextual
factors,
learning
and
Public
sector
pre-­‐commercial
adapta/on,
complementary
artefacts,
procurement
and
innova/on
knowledge
transfer,
technical
design
System’s
perspec/ves:
Chain-­‐Linked
model
Distributed
process
model
Increased
emphasis
on
adapta/on
and
u/lisa/on
Interac/ve
learning
theory
Role
of
regula/ve,
norma/ve
and
cogni/ve
Network
analysis
Development
Block
theory
ins/tu/ons
Large
technical
system’s
approach
Impact
criteria:
-­‐Stability
of
the
systems
Visualisa/on
tools,
methodologies,
fidelty
with
-­‐
Genera/ve,
Transforma/ve,
real
world
Resource-­‐integra/on
and
User-­‐
interac/on
capabili/es