@User Driven Open Ecosystems go really Local, in Mechelen (Belgium) 22nd - 23rd, 2012

1. 6th
Wave
Launch
Ceremony
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
Jesse
Marsh
6wave
Coordinator
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
1

2. ENoLL
Waves:
Terms
of
Reference
• Openness
– Opportunity
for
all
potenBal
Living
Labs
• Transparency
– Clear
rules,
criteria
and
processes
• Fairness
– ObjecBvity,
avoiding
conflict
of
interest
01/06/12
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
2
2

3. ENoLL
Waves
1-­‐5
01/06/12
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
3
3

4. 6wave
applicaBons
• 119
pre-­‐registraBons
• 72
proposals
submiQed
• 71
eligible
proposals
01/06/12
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
4
4

5. EvaluaBon
teams
• 6
evaluaBon
teams
of
3
members
each
– All
ENoLL
members
– Team
members
from
different
countries
– Team
leaders
with
previous
experience
• 12
proposals
per
team
– 3
readers
minimum
for
each
proposal
– None
from
same
country
• X-­‐Team
cross-­‐evaluaBons
– 1
common
and
1
specific
from
each
team
01/06/12
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
5
5

6. EvaluaBon
scoring
• Scores
of
0-­‐5
for
each
of
the
20
criteria
• Aggregated
averages
for
each
of
the
5
groups
– OrganisaBon,
openness,
resources,
users
and
reality,
value
• Total
score
of
aggregate
values
• Scores
averaged
for
each
team
• Thresholds
for
both
group
and
total
scores
01/06/12
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
6
6

7. EvaluaBon
phases
1. Individual
evaluators
read
and
score
2. Teams
reach
consensus
and
submit
3. All
results
compiled,
thresholds
adjusted
4. Team
results
compared
with
each
other
and
X-­‐Team
scores
5. Teams
revise
scoring
for
overall
coherence
6. Final
results
compiled,
consensus
reached
7. Results
sent
to
ENoLL
Council
for
approval
01/06/12
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
7
7

8. Typical
weaknesses
• Where
are
the
users?
Weak
involvement
in
co-­‐design,
lack
of
methodology
• Project,
not
innovaBon
ecosystem
• Excessive
technology
push
/
insufficient
ICT
• Weak,
closed,
or
limited
partnerships,
lack
of
commitment
and/or
resources
• Future
plans,
liQle
experience
• Lack
of
focus,
limited
value
and
impact
01/06/12
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
8
8

9. Results
• 46
Living
Labs
selected
• 31
EU
members,
from
7
countries
• 15
Non-­‐EU
members
(33%),
from
8
countries
01/06/12
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
9
9

10. Waves
1-­‐6
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
10

11. ENoLL
today
01/06/12
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
11
11

12. 6°
Wave
by
Country
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
12

13. ENoLL
by
ConBnent
01/06/12
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
13
13

14. Date
of
ConsBtuBon
01/06/12
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
14
14

15. ThemaBc
domains
01/06/12
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
15
15

16. Welcome
to
ENoLL!
• Compile
and
send
your
info
leaflet
• Register
with
the
ENoLL
site
• Choose
your
membership
profile
• Express
your
interest
in
a
Working
Group
• Join
one
or
more
ThemaBc
Domain
Networks
and...
• Stay
around
for
the
group
photo!
01/06/12
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
16
16

17. Thank
you
for
your
aQenBon
• Jesse
Marsh,
6°
wave
coordinator
• Álvaro
Oliveira
and
Mikael
Börjeson,
Task
Force
core
group
• Pieter
Balloon
and
Anna
Kivilehto,
secretarial
support
• Francesco
Molinari,
member
analyses
• The
ENoLL
evaluaBon
team
...and
our
thanks
to
all
proposers
info@enoll.org
01/06/12
Mechelen,
23
May,
2012
The
6th
Wave
Process
and
Outcomes
17
17