SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 2
Diagnosis of Occupational Disease

The key criteria for diagnosing an occupational disease in any individual are:
a) The clinical features must fit in with what is known about the health effects following
exposure to the specified agent. The symptoms and signs should fit, and this may be
supported in some cases by suitable diagnostic tests.
b) There must be indication of sufficient occupational exposure. Evidence on exposure
may be obtained through taking the occupational history, results of occupational hygiene
measurements taken at the workplace, biological monitoring results, and/or records of
incidents of over-exposure.
c) The time interval between exposure and effect must be consistent with what is known
about the natural history and progress of the disease. Exposure must precede health
effects. However, in some conditions such as occupational asthma, a past history of
childhood asthma and/or asthmatic attacks occurring before occupational exposure, does
not
automatically rule out the possibility of a workplace agent causing subsequent asthmatic
attacks.
d) The differential diagnosis must be considered. There are non-occupational conditions
that have similar clinical features as occupational diseases, and a physician will have to
take
this into account before diagnosing or excluding an occupational disease.
                         Information notices on occupational diseases: a guide to diagnosis EC, 2009
As an additional aid to diagnosing occupational diseases, retain the following concepts for
exposure:
i. Minimum intensity of exposure – This is the minimum level of exposure that is required to
cause disease. Lower exposures are unlikely to lead to occupational disease. This concept is
applicable especially for toxic agents. For agents that are carcinogenic or allergenic, it is not
usually possible to define a minimum threshold dose. Direct acting carcinogens in molecular
amounts are in theory capable of affecting cellular DNA and initiating carcinogenesis.
However, for some carcinogens, it may be possible to identify a threshold of initiation of
adverse health effects. Allergens may require substantial exposure to cause sensitization.
But once an individual is sensitized, minute amounts can be capable of eliciting an allergic
response.
ii. Minimum duration of exposure
This is the shortest exposure period for which disease can occur. Periods of exposure less
than this are unlikely to cause disease.
iii. Maximum latent period
This refers to the length of time from cessation of exposure, beyond which it is unlikely that
any disease can be attributed to the exposure. E.G., , acute myocardial ischemia occurring a
year after an acute exposure to carbon monoxide is not attributable to that exposure.
iv. Minimum induction period
This is the shortest period from beginning of exposure to beginning of disease below which
the exposure would have been unlikely to have caused the disease. For example, lung cancer
developing within a year after first exposure to asbestos is unlikely to be attributed to that
exposure
                           Information notices on occupational diseases: a guide to diagnosis EC, 2009

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a A guide to diagnosis ec

Occupational Medicine presentation Biological Factors.pptx
Occupational Medicine presentation Biological Factors.pptxOccupational Medicine presentation Biological Factors.pptx
Occupational Medicine presentation Biological Factors.pptxcathelena1
 
Diagnostic Testing Conference 2020
Diagnostic Testing Conference 2020Diagnostic Testing Conference 2020
Diagnostic Testing Conference 20204 All of Us
 
1200jlipman-140909221204-phpapp02.pdf
1200jlipman-140909221204-phpapp02.pdf1200jlipman-140909221204-phpapp02.pdf
1200jlipman-140909221204-phpapp02.pdfyasmineabdelkarim5
 
4.hazards of working in the operation room
4.hazards of working in the operation room4.hazards of working in the operation room
4.hazards of working in the operation roomHenok Eshetie
 
The antibiotic arms race: Getting the launch codes right.
The antibiotic arms race: Getting the launch codes right.The antibiotic arms race: Getting the launch codes right.
The antibiotic arms race: Getting the launch codes right.SMACC Conference
 
Occupational disease
Occupational diseaseOccupational disease
Occupational diseasepremvisva
 
natural hearth and disease.pptx
natural hearth and disease.pptxnatural hearth and disease.pptx
natural hearth and disease.pptxIvwananjisikombe1
 
pilot-Occupational_Health_and_Diseases.ppt
pilot-Occupational_Health_and_Diseases.pptpilot-Occupational_Health_and_Diseases.ppt
pilot-Occupational_Health_and_Diseases.pptBlentlhanGoncalolu1
 
The bloodborne pathogen standard final
The bloodborne pathogen standard finalThe bloodborne pathogen standard final
The bloodborne pathogen standard finalkgriffin62
 
LECTURE 2 Natural History of Diseases.pptx
LECTURE 2 Natural History of Diseases.pptxLECTURE 2 Natural History of Diseases.pptx
LECTURE 2 Natural History of Diseases.pptxIvwananjisikombe1
 
NELC-A1C20120930a
NELC-A1C20120930aNELC-A1C20120930a
NELC-A1C20120930aMark Gusack
 
Analytical epidemiology
Analytical  epidemiologyAnalytical  epidemiology
Analytical epidemiologyb_bhushan
 
Final Project Portfolio
Final Project PortfolioFinal Project Portfolio
Final Project PortfolioShannon Yeh
 
OUTBREAK INVESTIGATIONS.pptx
OUTBREAK INVESTIGATIONS.pptxOUTBREAK INVESTIGATIONS.pptx
OUTBREAK INVESTIGATIONS.pptxssuser809a50
 
Healthy hospital environment
Healthy hospital environmentHealthy hospital environment
Healthy hospital environmentMahmoud Shaqria
 

Semelhante a A guide to diagnosis ec (20)

Occupational Medicine presentation Biological Factors.pptx
Occupational Medicine presentation Biological Factors.pptxOccupational Medicine presentation Biological Factors.pptx
Occupational Medicine presentation Biological Factors.pptx
 
Diagnostic Testing Conference 2020
Diagnostic Testing Conference 2020Diagnostic Testing Conference 2020
Diagnostic Testing Conference 2020
 
1200jlipman-140909221204-phpapp02.pdf
1200jlipman-140909221204-phpapp02.pdf1200jlipman-140909221204-phpapp02.pdf
1200jlipman-140909221204-phpapp02.pdf
 
4.hazards of working in the operation room
4.hazards of working in the operation room4.hazards of working in the operation room
4.hazards of working in the operation room
 
The antibiotic arms race: Getting the launch codes right.
The antibiotic arms race: Getting the launch codes right.The antibiotic arms race: Getting the launch codes right.
The antibiotic arms race: Getting the launch codes right.
 
Occupational disease
Occupational diseaseOccupational disease
Occupational disease
 
natural hearth and disease.pptx
natural hearth and disease.pptxnatural hearth and disease.pptx
natural hearth and disease.pptx
 
1200 j lipman
1200 j lipman1200 j lipman
1200 j lipman
 
pilot-Occupational_Health_and_Diseases.ppt
pilot-Occupational_Health_and_Diseases.pptpilot-Occupational_Health_and_Diseases.ppt
pilot-Occupational_Health_and_Diseases.ppt
 
The bloodborne pathogen standard final
The bloodborne pathogen standard finalThe bloodborne pathogen standard final
The bloodborne pathogen standard final
 
LECTURE 2 Natural History of Diseases.pptx
LECTURE 2 Natural History of Diseases.pptxLECTURE 2 Natural History of Diseases.pptx
LECTURE 2 Natural History of Diseases.pptx
 
NELC-A1C20120930a
NELC-A1C20120930aNELC-A1C20120930a
NELC-A1C20120930a
 
Analytical epidemiology
Analytical  epidemiologyAnalytical  epidemiology
Analytical epidemiology
 
Occupational safety
Occupational safetyOccupational safety
Occupational safety
 
006.safetymanagement v3
006.safetymanagement v3006.safetymanagement v3
006.safetymanagement v3
 
Final Project Portfolio
Final Project PortfolioFinal Project Portfolio
Final Project Portfolio
 
Importance of posture
Importance of postureImportance of posture
Importance of posture
 
OUTBREAK INVESTIGATIONS.pptx
OUTBREAK INVESTIGATIONS.pptxOUTBREAK INVESTIGATIONS.pptx
OUTBREAK INVESTIGATIONS.pptx
 
Healthy hospital environment
Healthy hospital environmentHealthy hospital environment
Healthy hospital environment
 
Disease and illness occurance.pdf
Disease and illness occurance.pdfDisease and illness occurance.pdf
Disease and illness occurance.pdf
 

Mais de nuovirischisullavoro

Mais de nuovirischisullavoro (6)

Crit causal07
Crit causal07Crit causal07
Crit causal07
 
Causazione2004
Causazione2004Causazione2004
Causazione2004
 
Malattie da denunciare_decreto 14 gennaio 2008
Malattie da denunciare_decreto 14 gennaio 2008Malattie da denunciare_decreto 14 gennaio 2008
Malattie da denunciare_decreto 14 gennaio 2008
 
Tabelle allegate al dm 9 aprile 2008
Tabelle allegate al dm 9 aprile 2008Tabelle allegate al dm 9 aprile 2008
Tabelle allegate al dm 9 aprile 2008
 
Caso singolo
Caso singoloCaso singolo
Caso singolo
 
A guide to diagnosis ec
A guide to diagnosis ecA guide to diagnosis ec
A guide to diagnosis ec
 

A guide to diagnosis ec

  • 1. Diagnosis of Occupational Disease The key criteria for diagnosing an occupational disease in any individual are: a) The clinical features must fit in with what is known about the health effects following exposure to the specified agent. The symptoms and signs should fit, and this may be supported in some cases by suitable diagnostic tests. b) There must be indication of sufficient occupational exposure. Evidence on exposure may be obtained through taking the occupational history, results of occupational hygiene measurements taken at the workplace, biological monitoring results, and/or records of incidents of over-exposure. c) The time interval between exposure and effect must be consistent with what is known about the natural history and progress of the disease. Exposure must precede health effects. However, in some conditions such as occupational asthma, a past history of childhood asthma and/or asthmatic attacks occurring before occupational exposure, does not automatically rule out the possibility of a workplace agent causing subsequent asthmatic attacks. d) The differential diagnosis must be considered. There are non-occupational conditions that have similar clinical features as occupational diseases, and a physician will have to take this into account before diagnosing or excluding an occupational disease. Information notices on occupational diseases: a guide to diagnosis EC, 2009
  • 2. As an additional aid to diagnosing occupational diseases, retain the following concepts for exposure: i. Minimum intensity of exposure – This is the minimum level of exposure that is required to cause disease. Lower exposures are unlikely to lead to occupational disease. This concept is applicable especially for toxic agents. For agents that are carcinogenic or allergenic, it is not usually possible to define a minimum threshold dose. Direct acting carcinogens in molecular amounts are in theory capable of affecting cellular DNA and initiating carcinogenesis. However, for some carcinogens, it may be possible to identify a threshold of initiation of adverse health effects. Allergens may require substantial exposure to cause sensitization. But once an individual is sensitized, minute amounts can be capable of eliciting an allergic response. ii. Minimum duration of exposure This is the shortest exposure period for which disease can occur. Periods of exposure less than this are unlikely to cause disease. iii. Maximum latent period This refers to the length of time from cessation of exposure, beyond which it is unlikely that any disease can be attributed to the exposure. E.G., , acute myocardial ischemia occurring a year after an acute exposure to carbon monoxide is not attributable to that exposure. iv. Minimum induction period This is the shortest period from beginning of exposure to beginning of disease below which the exposure would have been unlikely to have caused the disease. For example, lung cancer developing within a year after first exposure to asbestos is unlikely to be attributed to that exposure Information notices on occupational diseases: a guide to diagnosis EC, 2009