Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Stung Bankia Investors Look To Courts For Justice
1. Stung Bankia Investors Look To Courts For Justice
[US Market News] TradingReview360.com: We search to bring you the very latest news from
around the globe. The article below is sourced from the latest US Market News.
Read on to find out more:
MADRID (Reuters) – Spanish savers and pensioners who have seen their money wiped out by
investing in state-rescued lender Bankia are likely to seek redress in court rather than wait for
any official inquiry, which looks increasingly unlikely.
About 350,000 stockholders will share the pain of the bank’s European bailout, many of them
bank clients who were sold the shares through an aggressive marketing campaign for its stock
market flotation in 2011.
Shares in the lender, rescued by the state in May in Spain‘s biggest ever bank bailout, fell to
record lows on Friday, tumbling over 40 percent from the start of the week after it emerged
losses on bad loans were worse than expected.
“Going to the courts and seeing if a judge can bring us justice is the only path left to us,”
said Maricarmen Olivares, whose parents lost 600,000 euros ($793,300) they made from selling
her father’s car workshop by investing in Bankia preference shares.
Neither of the two main political parties want to push for a full investigation into Bankia’s
demise, which could draw attention to their own role in a debacle that has driven Spain to the
brink of an international rescue, commentators say.
“Investigations work when a political party has something to gain over another. In this case,
no-one has anything to gain,” said Juan Carlos Rodriguez, of consultancy Analistas Socio
Politicos.
“I don’t see the big parties investigating this because if there have been errors committed,
they have been committed by both sides.”
The Socialist Party was in power when Bankia was formed in 2010 from an ill-matched
combination of seven regional savings banks, a union that concentrated an unsustainable
exposure to Spain’s collapsed property sector.
Immense political pressure from the then government forced Bankia executives to push ahead
with an initial public offering in July 2011 as Spain sought to bring private capital into its banking
system and avoid a European bailout.
Then chairman, Rodrigo Rato, a former chief of the International Monetary Fund, had strong
links to the centre-right Popular Party (PP) and was finance minister in a previous PP
administration.
1/4
2. A small political party, UPyD, forced the High Court in July to open an investigation into
whether Rato, ousted when the bank was nationalized in May, and 32 other former board
members are guilty of fraud, price-fixing or falsifying accounts.
Investigating magistrate Fernando Andreu has so far not brought charges against anyone and
could still drop the case.
“WE WON’T SEE OUR MONEY AGAIN”
Rato appeared in a private session before the judge on December 20 where he denied any
blame for what happened.
Rato, who cannot legally speak to the press because he is the subject of a court investigation,
has kept a low profile since the bank rescue in May. Protesters gathered outside the court on
the day of his declaration wearing masks of his face.
The probe centres around Bankia’s stock market listing, the formation of the lender from the
seven savings banks and the gaping capital shortfall revealed at the bank after the state
takeover in May.
Rato and 23 others including bank executives and cabinet ministers were called to testify
before a parliamentary committee in July this year where Rato said he had a clear conscience
and had done things properly.
“That was just window-dressing by the PP following the outcry over the Bankia disaster,” said
a Socialist Party source.
The opposition Socialists called for a full parliamentary investigation in May, but the ruling PP
blocked it, the Socialist Party source said. A PP spokeswoman said any investigation of Bankia
should be carried out through the courts, not the government.
A government source said any investigative process would not fall to the government, but to
the courts.
Bankia, alongside other Spanish banks, sold billions of euros of preference shares and
subordinated debt to high street clients, many of whom say they were tricked into parting with
their savings and are seeking compensation.
The investigating magistrate is not including the mis-selling of preference shares – hybrid
instruments that fall between a share and a bond – in the probe.
Holders of preference shares at Bankia will incur losses of up to 46 percent as part of the
European bailout, receiving shares rather than cash in exchange.
“We won’t see our money again, that’s for sure. They’ll give us shares, but shares with no
value or credibility in a nationalized bank,” said Olivares, who said she had heard nothing from
2/4
3. the bank as to how much their losses would be.
The losses each investor will have to take has yet to be decided, a Bankia spokesman said,
adding that hybrid debtholders at all rescued banks had to take losses, not just at Bankia.
A source close to the court investigation said there would certainly be scope for a separate
wider probe into the mis-selling of preference shares, not just at Bankia, but throughout Spain’s
savings banks.
Olivares, like many other small savers at Spain’s state-rescued banks, claims her parents
were sold the preference shares as a kind of high-interest savings account and that the bank
staff did not explain the risks attached.
The government is in the process of setting up an arbitration process to compensate Bankia
clients who can prove that they were duped into buying preference shares, Economy Minister
Luis de Guindos said last week.
But many ordinary Spaniards who lost their life savings through the Bankia rescue say this is
not enough and they want answers as to what happened to their money.
“We want justice, at least some kind of recognition that we were swindled,” said Raimundo
Guillen, a 50-year-old electricity station worker who put 30,000 euros in preference shares with
Bankia under the impression they were a form of savings account.
“It’s as if they’ve stolen your wallet – blatantly, with their face uncovered.”
($1 = 0.7564 euros)
(Reporting By Sonya Dowsett; Editing by Will Waterman)
Check out the original source here.
We hope that you felt the above article was of value. Please feel free to share this article.
Staying on par with the Market News from around the globe is essential for investors and
traders alike. Whether it is political, financial or social modifications which can affect your
financial investments in the short, medium or long term, it’s good to be in the understand.
We aspire to bring you the most up to date news as it breaks, so you in front of the majority of
investors and traders .
3/4