The document discusses cardiovascular risk factors and management. It summarizes that most heart attacks are caused by low-grade coronary artery blockages rupturing and triggering blood clots. Several risk factors can make plaques more vulnerable to rupture, such as inflammation, thin fibrous caps, and lipid-rich cores. Lifestyle changes and statin drugs are effective at reducing cardiovascular risks by lowering cholesterol levels and having additional anti-inflammatory effects. More aggressive lowering of LDL cholesterol is associated with greater reduction in heart attack risk.
16. Coronary Remodeling (Adapted from Glagov et al.) Normal vessel Minimal CAD Progression Compensatory expansion maintains constant lumen Expansion overcome: lumen narrows Severe CAD Moderate CAD Glagov et al, N Engl J Med , 1987.
17. Atherosclerosis: A Progressive Process Disease progression PHASE I: Initiation PHASE II: Progression PHASE III: Complication Normal Fatty Streak Fibrous Plaque Occlusive Atherosclerotic Plaque Plaque Rupture/ Fissure & Thrombosis MI Stroke Critical Leg Ischemia Coronary Death Unstable Angina Libby P. Circulation. 2001;104:365-372.
18. IVUS=intravascular ultrasound Nissen S, Yock P. Circulation 2001 ; 103: 604–616 Angiogram IVUS Little evidence of disease Atheroma No evidence of disease The IVUS technique can detect angiographically ‘silent’ atheroma
19. Correlation of CT angiography of the coronary arteries with intravascular ultrasound illustrates the ability of MDCT to demonstrate calcified and non-calcified coronary plaques (Becker et al., Eur J Radiol 2000) Non-calcified, soft, lipid-rich plaque in left anterior descending artery (arrow) . The plaque was confirmed by intravascular ultrasound (Kopp et al., Radiology 2004)
20.
21. Estimated 10-Year CHD Risk in 55-Year-Old Adults According to Levels of Various Risk Factors : Framingham Heart Study A B C D Blood Pressure (mm Hg) 120/80 140/90 140/90 140/90 Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) 200 240 240 240 HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) 50 50 40 40 Diabetes No No Yes Yes Cigarettes No No No Yes Source: Circulation 1998;97:1837-1847.
33. Relationship Between Changes in LDL-C and HDL-C Levels and CHD Risk Third Report of the NCEP Expert Panel. NIH Publication No. 01-3670 2001. http://hin.nhlbi.nih.gov/ncep_slds/menu.htm 1% decrease in LDL-C reduces CHD risk by 1% 1% increase in HDL-C reduces CHD risk by 3%
34. CHD Outcomes in Clinical Trials of LDL Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy Mean CHD CHD No. No. Person- cholesterol Incidence Mortality Intervention trials treated years reduction (%) (% change) (% change) Surgery 1 421 4,084 22 -43 -30 Sequestrants 3 1,992 14,491 9 -21 -32 Diet 6 1,200 6,356 11 -24 -21 Statins 12 17,405 89,123 20 -30 -29 Source: This table is adapted from the meta-analysis of Gordon, 2000.
35.
36. Vessel Wall And Endothelial Cell Membrane Changes With Atherogenesis Reproduced from Mason et al. Circulation . 2004;109(suppl II):II-34, with permission. Mason et al. Am J Cardiol . 2005;96(suppl):11F.
37. Role Of Statins In ACS: Non-Lipid Effects ( Pleiotropic effects) ADP = adenosine diphosphate; CD40-L = CD40 ligand; IFN = interferon; IL = interleukin; vWF = von Willebrand factor. Reproduced from Ray and Cannon. J Thromb Thrombolysis . 2004;18:89, with permission. Cannon and Ray. Am J Cardiol . 2005;96:54F.
38. Clinical Events Correlate Directly With On-Treatment LDL-Cholesterol Levels P = placebo; S = statin. Reproduced from O'Keefe et al. J Am Coll Cardiol . 2004;43:2142, with permission. CHD Events (%) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 55 75 95 115 135 155 175 195 LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) y = 0.0599x - 3.3952 R 2 = 0.9305 P =.0019 AFCAPS-S WOSCOPS-S ASCOT-S ASCOT-P AFCAPS-P WOSCOPS-P Primary prevention: 4-5 yr duration
39. ASCOT-LLA: Nonfatal MI And Fatal CAD Primary End Point Adapted from Sever et al. Lancet . 2003;361:1149, with permission. Sever et al. Am J Cardiol . 2005;96(suppl):39F. 2 0 1 4 3 Years 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Cumulative Incidence (%) Placebo Atorvastatin 10 mg Number of Events 36% Reduction HR = 0.64 (0.50-0.83) P =.0005 Number of Events 154 100 N=10,305
40. Effects of Lipid-Lowering Therapy on CHD Events in Statin Trials 25 20 15 10 5 0 Patients with CHD event (%) 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 S = statin-treated P = placebo-treated *Extrapolated to 5 y 4S - P CARE - P LIPID - P 4S - S WOSCOPS - S WOSCOPS - P AFCAPS - P AFCAPS - S LIPID - S CARE - S Primary prevention Simvastatin Pravastatin Lovastatin Modified from Kastelein JJP. Atherosclerosis. 1999;143(suppl 1): S17-S21. HPS - S HPS - P Atorvastatin ASCOT - S * ASCOT - P * Secondary prevention LDL-C (mg/dL)
41. PROVE IT-TIMI 22: A Major Cardiovascular Event Or Death From Any Cause Primary End Point Adapted from Cannon et al. N Engl J Med . 2004;350:1495, with permission. Ray and Cannon. Am J Cardiol . 2005;96(suppl):54F. 15 0 10 30 25 5 20 Months Of Follow-Up 0 3 9 15 21 6 12 18 24 27 30 Death Or Major Cardiovascular Event (%) Pravastatin 40 mg Atorvastatin 80 mg P =.005 Overall P =.03 n= 4,162 with CHD
42.
43. PROVE IT-TIMI 22: A Major Cardiovascular Event Or Death From Any Cause At Different Censoring Times Reproduced from Cannon et al. N Engl J Med . 2004;350:1495, with permission. Ray and Cannon. Am J Cardiol . 2005;96(suppl):54F. Censoring Time Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Risk Reduction (%) Event Rate (%) Atorvastatin Pravastatin 30 days 90 days 180 days End of follow-up 17 1.9 2.2 18 6.3 7.7 14 12.2 14.1 16 22.4 26.3 0.50 0.75 1.0 High-Dose Atorvastatin Better Standard-Dose Pravastatin Better 1.50 1.25
45. Evolution of Lipid Management Guidelines ATP I (1988) ATP II (1993) ATP III (2001) Diet; low-dose, nonstatin monotherapy High-dose statin, combination therapy Low- to moderate-dose statin monotherapy Increasing aggressiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapy The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP)
46. Update to ATP III: Risk Categories, LDL-C Goals Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines: Circulation . 2004;110:227-239. <160 <130 <130 <100 (optional <70) LDL-C Goal (mg/dL) > 160 > 130 > 130 > 100 Initial TLC (mg/dl) > 130 (optional 100-129) Moderately high risk: 2+ risk factors (10-year risk 10-20%) > 190 (optional 160-189) Lower risk: 0–1 risk factor >160 Moderate risk: 2+ risk factors (10-year risk 10%) > 100 (optional <100) High risk: CHD or CHD risk equivalents (10-year risk >20%) Consider drug (mg/dl) Risk Category
108. Algorithm for ECG identification of the IRA in Anterior MI STE in V 1 , V 2 and V 3 STE in V1 (>2.5 mm) and AVL or RBBB with Q wave or both ST depression (<1 mm) in II, III, and AVF STE in II, III, and AVF Wrap around
109. A 63 yo lady, 3 hrs 7/10 CP Given Metalalyse + Clexane , continuing chest pain, VF x II in cath lab
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115. ED :55 yo man, 3 hrs Lt. CP 5/10, less with sits forward
116. GP: 34 yo athlete, anterior CP 3/10, pt. of tenderness Fish hook
137. Wong, T. Y. et al. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2310-2317 Examples of Mild Hypertensive Retinopathy AV nicking Focal narrowing AV nicking Copper wiring
138.
139.
140. Cerebral Autoregulation Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) Cerebral blood flow (ml/100 gm per min ) 50 100 150 200 150 100 50 0 Normotensive Hypertensive Strandgaard S,et al; Br Med J 1:507, 1973
141.
142.
143.
144.
145. Approach to HT crisis BP > 220/120 mmHg Headache No neurosign No target organ damage Urgency Identify the cause and Rx the cause ( panic, anxiety) Otherwise use oral anti HTagent Neurosign( encep., stroke) Retinopathy gr III, IV severe chest pain ( IHD, dissecting aneu) Pulmonary edema Cathecholamine excess ARF Emergency IV therapy Recheck in 6-24 hr