SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 118
By : DR. SAEED AHMED
ASSITANT PROFESSOR PIMS ORTHO AND
TRAUMA DEPARTEMENT
 Femoral Head Fractures
 Femoral Neck Fractures
 Intertrochanteric Fractures
 Subtrochanteric Fractures
 Femoral Shaft Fractures
 Distal Femur Fractures
 Femoral head has 3 sources of arterial
supply
 extracapsular arterial ring
 medial circumflex femoral artery (main supply to the
head)
 from profunda femoris
 lateral circumflex femoral artery
 ascending cervical branches
 artery to the ligamentum teres
 from the obturator artery or MCFA
 supplies perifoveal area
 Associated with hip dislocations
-- Anterior hip dislocation.
-- Posterior hip dislocation.
 location and size of the fracture fragment
and degree of comminution depend on
the position of the hip at the time of
dislocation.
 Impaction, avulsion or shear forces involved
 unrestrained passenger MVA (knee against dashboard)
 falls from height
 sports injury
 industrial accidents
 5-15% of posterior hip dislocations are associated
with a femoral head fracture
 because of contact between femoral head and
posterior rim of acetabulum
 anterior hip dislocations usually associated
with impaction/indentation fractures of the
femoral head
Pipkin Classification
Type I Fx below fovea/ligamentum (small)
Does not involve the weightbearing portion of the
femoral head
Type II Fx above fovea/ ligamentum (larger)
Involves the weightbearing portion of the femoral
head
Type III Type I or II with associated femoral neck fx
High incidence of AVN
Type IV Type I or II with associated acetabular fx
(usually posterior wall fracture)
 History
 frontal impact MVA with knee striking dashboard
 fall from height
 Symptoms
 localized hip pain
 unable to bear weight
 other symptoms associated with impact
 Physical exam
 inspection
 shortened lower limb
 with large acetabular wall fractures, little to no rotational
asymmetry is seen
 posterior dislocation
 limb is flexed, adducted, internally rotated
 anterior dislocation
 limb is flexed, abducted, externally rotated
 neurovascular
 may have signs of sciatic nerve injury
 Radiographs
 recommended views
 AP pelvis, lateral hip and Judet views
 both pre-reduction and post-reduction
 inlet and outlet views
 if acetabular or pelvic ring injury suspected
 CT scan
 indications
 after reduction
 to evaluate:
 concentric reduction
 loose bodies in the joint
 acetabular fracture
 femoral head or neck fracture
 Nonoperative
 hip reduction
 indications
 acute dislocations
 reduce hip dislocation within 6 hours
 technique
 obtain post reduction CT
 TDWB x 4-6 weeks, restrict adduction and internal
rotation
 indications
 Pipkin I
 undisplaced Pipkin II with < 1mm step off
 no interposed fragments
 stable hip joint
 technique
 perform serial radiographs to document maintained
reduction
 Operative
--ORIF
 indications
 Pipkin II with > 1mm step off
 if performing removal of loose bodies in the joint
 associated neck or acetabular fx (Pipkin type III and IV)
 polytrauma
 irreducible fracture-dislocation
 Pipkin IV
 treatment dictated by characteristics of acetabular
fracture
 small posterior wall fragments can be treated
nonsurgically and suprafoveal fractures can then be
treated through an anterior approach
 Arthroplasty
 indicationsPipkin I, II (displaced), III, and IV
in older patients
 Fractures that are significantly displaced,
osteoporotic or comminuted
 Mechanism
 high energy in young patients
 low energy falls in older patients
 Osteology
 normal neck shaft-angle 130 +/- 7 degrees
 normal anteversion 10 +/- 7 degrees
 Blood supply to femoral head
 major contributor is medial femoral
circumflex (lateral epiphyseal artery)
 some contribution to anterior and inferior head from
lateral femoral circumflex
 some contribution from inferior gluteal artery
 small and insignificant supply from artery of
ligamentum teres
 displacement of femoral neck fracture will disrupt
the blood supply and cause an intracapsular
hematoma (effect is controversial)
 Symptoms
 impacted and stress fractures
 slight pain in the groin or pain referred along the medial
side of the thigh and knee
 displaced fractures
 pain in the entire hip region
 Physical exam
 impacted and stress fractures
 no obvious clinical deformity
 minor discomfort with active or passive hip range of
motion, muscle spasms at extremes of motion
 pain with percussion over greater trochanter
 displaced fractures
 leg in external rotation and abduction, with shortening
 Radiographs
 recommended views
 obtain AP pelvis and cross-table lateral, and full length
femur film of ipsilateral side
 consider obtaining dedicated imaging of uninjured hip
to use as template intraop
 traction-internal rotation AP hip is best for defining
fracture type
 Garden classification is based on AP pelvis
 CT
 helpful in determining displacement and degree
of comminution in some patients
Nonoperative
 observation alone
 indications
 may be considered in some patients
who are non-ambulators, have minimal
pain, and who are at high risk for
surgical intervention
 cannulated screw fixation
 indications
 nondisplaced transcervical fx
 Garden I and II fracture patterns in the
physiologically elderly
 displaced transcervical fx in young patient
 considered a surgical emergency
 achieve reduction to limit vascular insult
 reduction must be anatomic, so open if necessary
 sliding hip screw or cephalomedullary nail
 indications
 basicervical fracture
 vertical fracture pattern in a young patient
 biomechanically superior to cannulated screws
 consider placement of additional cannulated screw above
sliding hip screw to prevent rotation
 hemiarthroplasty
 indications
 debilitated elderly patients
 metabolic bone disease
 total hip arthoplasty
 indications
 older active patients
 patients with preexisting hip osteoarthritis
 more predictable pain relief and better functional outcome than
hemiarthroplasty
 arthroplasty for Garden III and IV in patient < 85 years
 Extracapsular fractures of the proximal
femur between the greater and lesser
trochanters.
 elderly
 low energy falls in osteoporotic patients
 young
 high energy trauma
 intertrochanteric area exists between greater and
lesser trochanters
 made of dense trabecular bone
 calcar femorale
 vertical wall of dense bone that extends from
posteromedial aspect of femoral shaft to posterior
portion of femoral neck
 Determines stability
 Physical Exampainful, shortened, externally
rotated lower extremity
 Radiographs
 recommended views
 AP pelvis
 AP of hip, cross table lateral
 full length femur radiographs
 CT or MRI
 useful if radiographs are negative but physical
exam consistent with fracture
 sliding hip compression screw
 indications
 stable intertrochanteric fractures
 outcomes
 equal outcomes when compared to intramedullary hip screws
for stable fracture patterns
 intramedullary hip screw (cephalomedullary nail)
 indications
 stable fracture patterns
 unstable fracture patterns
 reverse obliquity fractures
 56% failure when treated with sliding hip screw
 subtrochanteric extension
 lack of integrity of femoral wall
 associated with increased displacement and collapse when
treated with sliding hip screw
 Arthroplasty
 indications
 severely comminuted fractures
 preexisting symptomatic degenerative arthritis
 osteoporotic bone that is unlikely to hold
internal fixation
 salvage for failed internal fixation
 Subtrochanteric typically defined as area
from lesser trochanter to 5cm distal
fractures with an associated
intertrochanteric component may be called
 intertrochanteric fracture with
subtrochanteric extension
 peritrochanteric fracture
 Symptoms
 hip and thigh pain
 inability to bear weight
 Physical exam
 pain with motion
 typically associated with obvious deformity
(shortening and varus alignment)
 flexion of proximal fragment may threaten
overlying skin
 Radiographs
 views
 AP and lateral of the hip
 AP pelvis
 full length femur films including the knee
 additional views
 traction views may assist with defining fragments in
comminuted patterns but is not required
 findings
 bisphosphonate-related fractures have
 lateral cortical thickening
 transverse fracture orientation
 medial spike
 lack of comminution
 Nonoperative
 observation with pain management
 indications
 non-ambulatory patients with medical co-morbidities that would
not allow them to tolerate surgery
 limited role due to strong muscular forces displacing fracture and
inability to mobilize patients without surgical intervention
 Operative
 intramedullary nailing (usually cephalomedullary)
 indications
 historically Russel-Taylor type I fractures
 newer design of intramedullary nails has expanded indications
 most subtrochanteric fractures treated with IM nail
 fixed angle plate
 indications
 surgeon preference
 associated femoral neck fracture
 narrow medullary canal
 pre-existing femoral shaft deformity
 Growth centers of the proximal
femurproximal femoral epiphysis
 accounts for 13-15% of leg length
 accounts for 30% length of femur
 proximal femoral physis grows 3 mm/yr
 entire lower limb grows 23 mm/yr
 trochanteric apophysis
 traction apophysis
 contributes to femoral neck growth
 disordered growth
 injury to the GT apophysis leads to shortening of the
GT and coxa valga
 overgrowth of the GT apophysis leads to coxa vara
 Nonoperative
--spica cast in abduction, weekly radiographs for 3wks
 indications
 Type IA, II, III, IV, nondisplaced, <4yrs
 Operative emergent ORIF, capsulotomy, or joint aspiration
 indications
 open hip fracture
 vessel injury where large vessel repair is required
 concomitant hip dislocation or significant displacement, especially type I
 may decrease the rate of AVN (supporting data equivocal)
 closed reduction internal fixation (CRIF)/ percutaneous pinning
(CRPP)
 indications
 Type II, displaced
 postop spica (abduction and internal rotation) x 6-12wk
 Type III and IV, displaced and older children
 open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF)
 indications
 Type IB
 pediatric hip screw / DHS
 indications
 Type IV
 Definition. femoral shaft fracture is defined as a fracture of
the diaphysis occurring between 5 cm distal to the lesser
trochanter and 5 cm proximal to the adductor tubercle
 High energy injuries frequently associated with life-
threatening conditions
 Traumatic
 high-energy
 most common in younger population
 often a result of high-speed motor vehicle accidents
 low-energy
 more common in elderly
 often a result of a fall from standing
 gunshot
 largest and strongest bone in the body
 femur has an anterior bow
 linea aspera
 rough crest of bone running down middle third of
posterior femur
 attachment site for various muscles and fascia
 acts as a compressive strut to accommodate
anterior bow to femur
Femur Fracture
Classification
AO/OTA Femur Diaphysis - Bone segment 32
 Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) should be initiated
 Symptoms
 pain in thigh
 Physical exam
 inspection
 tense, swollen thigh
 blood loss in closed femoral shaft fractures is 1000-1500ml
 for closed tibial shaft fractures, 500-1000ml
 blood loss in open fractures may be double that of closed
fractures
 affected leg often shortened
 tenderness about thigh
 motion
 examination for ipsilateral femoral neck fracture often difficult
secondary to pain from fracture
 neurovascular
 must record and document distal neurovascular status
 recommended views
 AP and lateral views of entire femur
 AP and lateral views of ipsilateral hip
 important to rule-out coexisting femoral neck
fracture
 AP and lateral views of ipsilateral knee
 Nonoperative
 long leg cast
 indications
 nondisplaced femoral shaft fractures in patients with multiple
medical comorbidities
 Operative
 antegrade intramedullary nail with reamed technique
 indications
 gold standard for treatment of diaphyseal femur fractures
 outcomes
 stabilization within 24 hours is associated with
 decreased pulmonary complications (ARDS)
 decreased thromboembolic events
 improved rehabilitation
 decreased length of stay and cost of hospitalization
 exception is a patient with a closed head injury
 critical to avoid hypotension and hypoxemia
 consider provisional fixation (damage control)
 Retrograde intramedullary nail with
reamed technique
 indications
 ipsilateral femoral neck fracture
 floating knee (ipsilateral tibial shaft fracture)
 use same incision for tibial nail
 ipsilateral acetabular fracture
 does not compromise surgical approach to acetabulum
 multiple system trauma
 bilateral femur fractures
 avoids repositioning
 morbid obesity
 ORIF with plate
 indications
 ipsilateral neck fracture requiring screw fixation
 fracture at distal metaphyseal-diaphyseal
junction
 inability to access medullary canal
 Defined as fxs from articular surface to 5cm
above metaphyseal flare
 Mechanism
 young patients
 high energy with significant displacement
 older patients
 low energy in osteoporotic bone with less
displacement
 anatomical axis of distal femur is 6-7 degrees
of valgus
 lateral cortex of femur slopes ~10 degrees,
medial cortex slopes ~25 degrees
 Supracondylar
 Intercondylar
 Radiographs
 obtain standard AP and Lat
 traction views
 AP, Lat, and oblique traction views can help characterize injury
 CT
 obtain with frontal and sagittal reconstructions
 useful for
 establish intra-articular involvement
 identify separate osteochondral fragments in the area of the
intercondylar notch
 identify coronal plane fx (Hoffa fx)
 38% incidence of Hoffa fx's in Type C fractures
 preoperative planning
 Angiography
 indicated when diminished distal pulses after gross
alignment restored
 open reduction internal fixation
 indications
 displaced fracture
 intra-articular fracture
 nonunion
 goals
 need anatomic reduction of joint
 stable fixation of articular component to shaft
 preserve vascularity
 technique (see below)
 postoperative
 early ROM of knee important
 non-weight bearing or touch toe weight-bearing for 6-8
weeks
 quadriceps and hamstring strength exercises
 Blade Plate Fixation
 Dynamic Condylar Screw Placement
 Locked Plate Fixation
• retrograde IM nail
• indications
• good for supracondylar fx without significant
comminution
• preferred implant in osteoporotic bone
• distal femoral replacement
• indications
• unreconstructable fracture
• fracture around prior total knee arthroplasty with
loose component
 correlated with age due to the increasing
thickness of the cortical shaft during skeletal
growth and maturity
 falls most common cause in toddlers
 high energy trauma is responsible for second
peak in adolescents
 MVC or ped vs vehicle
 fractures after minor trauma can be the
result of a pathologic process
 bone tumors, OI, osteopenia, etc.
 Descriptive classification
 characteristics of the fracture
 transverse
 comminuted
 spiral etc.
 integrity of soft-tissue envelope
 open
 closed fracture
 Stability
 length stable fractures
 are typically transverse or short oblique
 length unstable fractures
 are spiral or comminuted fractures
 Based on age and size of patient and fracture
pattern
 Guidelines provided by AAOS
 Physeal considerations of the knee general
assumptions
 leg growth continues until
 16 yrs in boys
 14 yrs in girls
 growth contribution
 leg grows 23 mm/year, with most of that coming
from the knee (15 mm/yr)
 proximal femur - 3 mm / yr (1/8 in)
 distal femur - 9 mm / yr (3/8 in)
 proximal tibia - 6 mm / yr (1/4 in)
 distal tibia - 5 mm / yr (3/16 in)
 Symptoms
 unable to bear weight
 Physical exam
 pain and swelling
 tenderness along the physis in the presence of a
knee effusion
 may see varus or valgus knee instability on exam
 MRI or ultrasound is now the diagnositic
modality of choice when confirmation of a
physeal fracture is needed
 follow up radiographs after 2-3 weeks of
casting can be used as treatment if physeal
injury is likely but not identifiable on injury
films
 stress radiographs to look for opening of the
physis were indicated in the past if there was
suspicion of physeal injury
 Nonoperative
 long leg casting
 indications
 stable nondisplaced fractures
 close clinical followup is mandatory
 Operative
 closed reduction and percutaneous pinning
followed by casting
 indications
 displaced Salter-Harris I or II fractures
 displaced fractures successfully reduced with closed
methods should still be pinned (undulating physis
makes unstable following reduction)
 technique
 avoid multiple attempts at reduction
 avoid physis with hardware if possible
 if physis must be crossed (SH I and SH II with small
Thurston-Holland fragments), use smooth k-wires
 SH II fracture, if possible, should be fixed with lag screws
across the metaphyseal segment avoiding the physis
 postoperatively follow closely to monitor for deformity
 indications
 Salter-Harris III and IV in order to anatomically
reduce articular surface
 irreducible SHI and SHII fractures
 reduction often blocked by periosteum infolding into
fracture site
 techniques
 If anatomic reduction cannot be obtained via
closed techniques, incision over the displaced
physis to remove interposed periosteum is
necessary.

More Related Content

What's hot

Femoral fracture
Femoral fractureFemoral fracture
Femoral fracture
aya tya
 
Application of traction in orthopaedics
Application of traction in orthopaedicsApplication of traction in orthopaedics
Application of traction in orthopaedics
Prabhnoor Hayer
 

What's hot (20)

Pelvic fractures
Pelvic fracturesPelvic fractures
Pelvic fractures
 
Clavicle fracture
Clavicle fractureClavicle fracture
Clavicle fracture
 
Septic Arthritis
Septic ArthritisSeptic Arthritis
Septic Arthritis
 
Non Union
Non UnionNon Union
Non Union
 
Patella fracture
Patella fracturePatella fracture
Patella fracture
 
Forearm fractures
Forearm fracturesForearm fractures
Forearm fractures
 
Open Fracture
Open FractureOpen Fracture
Open Fracture
 
Pott's disease ppt
Pott's disease pptPott's disease ppt
Pott's disease ppt
 
Acute Osteomyelitis
Acute OsteomyelitisAcute Osteomyelitis
Acute Osteomyelitis
 
Fracture of humerus
Fracture of humerusFracture of humerus
Fracture of humerus
 
Principles in fractures management
Principles in fractures managementPrinciples in fractures management
Principles in fractures management
 
Femoral fracture
Femoral fractureFemoral fracture
Femoral fracture
 
Shoulder Dislocations
Shoulder DislocationsShoulder Dislocations
Shoulder Dislocations
 
External fixator
External fixatorExternal fixator
External fixator
 
Compartment syndrome
Compartment syndromeCompartment syndrome
Compartment syndrome
 
Principles of amputation
Principles of amputationPrinciples of amputation
Principles of amputation
 
Neck of femur fractures
Neck  of femur fracturesNeck  of femur fractures
Neck of femur fractures
 
Traction(orthopedics)
Traction(orthopedics)Traction(orthopedics)
Traction(orthopedics)
 
Application of traction in orthopaedics
Application of traction in orthopaedicsApplication of traction in orthopaedics
Application of traction in orthopaedics
 
supracondylar fracture humerus in children
supracondylar fracture humerus in childrensupracondylar fracture humerus in children
supracondylar fracture humerus in children
 

Viewers also liked

FRACTURES 0F LOWER LIMB
  FRACTURES  0F LOWER LIMB     FRACTURES  0F LOWER LIMB
FRACTURES 0F LOWER LIMB
vishnu mohan
 

Viewers also liked (12)

clinical anatomy of proximal femur
clinical anatomy of proximal femurclinical anatomy of proximal femur
clinical anatomy of proximal femur
 
FRACTURES 0F LOWER LIMB
  FRACTURES  0F LOWER LIMB     FRACTURES  0F LOWER LIMB
FRACTURES 0F LOWER LIMB
 
Neck of Femur
Neck of FemurNeck of Femur
Neck of Femur
 
Imaging anatomy fractures of the femur
Imaging anatomy   fractures of the femurImaging anatomy   fractures of the femur
Imaging anatomy fractures of the femur
 
fracture of shaft of femur
fracture of shaft of femurfracture of shaft of femur
fracture of shaft of femur
 
Fracture neck femur 6 months old
Fracture neck femur 6 months oldFracture neck femur 6 months old
Fracture neck femur 6 months old
 
Fracture of Femur
Fracture of FemurFracture of Femur
Fracture of Femur
 
Surgical tips and tricks in fractures of femur
Surgical tips and tricks in fractures of femurSurgical tips and tricks in fractures of femur
Surgical tips and tricks in fractures of femur
 
P09 pediatric femur
P09 pediatric femurP09 pediatric femur
P09 pediatric femur
 
Femur (Gross Anatomy)
Femur (Gross Anatomy)Femur (Gross Anatomy)
Femur (Gross Anatomy)
 
Inter trochanteric fractures, fracture shaft of femur
Inter trochanteric fractures, fracture shaft of femurInter trochanteric fractures, fracture shaft of femur
Inter trochanteric fractures, fracture shaft of femur
 
Femur shaft fractures
Femur shaft fracturesFemur shaft fractures
Femur shaft fractures
 

Similar to Femur fracture

femurfracture-160828174022.pptx
femurfracture-160828174022.pptxfemurfracture-160828174022.pptx
femurfracture-160828174022.pptx
gufp
 
Orthopedic surgery 8th injuries to the lower limb ( 2 )
Orthopedic surgery 8th injuries to the lower limb ( 2 )Orthopedic surgery 8th injuries to the lower limb ( 2 )
Orthopedic surgery 8th injuries to the lower limb ( 2 )
RamiAboali
 
L01_Hip-dislocatinos-femoral-head.ppt
L01_Hip-dislocatinos-femoral-head.pptL01_Hip-dislocatinos-femoral-head.ppt
L01_Hip-dislocatinos-femoral-head.ppt
toto798365
 

Similar to Femur fracture (20)

Nof fracture
Nof fractureNof fracture
Nof fracture
 
femurfracture-160828174022.pptx
femurfracture-160828174022.pptxfemurfracture-160828174022.pptx
femurfracture-160828174022.pptx
 
Hip_Disloc_Fem_Hd_Fxs
Hip_Disloc_Fem_Hd_FxsHip_Disloc_Fem_Hd_Fxs
Hip_Disloc_Fem_Hd_Fxs
 
Intertrochentric femur fracture by DR.NAVEEN RATHOR
Intertrochentric femur fracture by DR.NAVEEN RATHORIntertrochentric femur fracture by DR.NAVEEN RATHOR
Intertrochentric femur fracture by DR.NAVEEN RATHOR
 
Intertrochanteric fracture femur
Intertrochanteric fracture femurIntertrochanteric fracture femur
Intertrochanteric fracture femur
 
Orthopedic surgery 8th injuries to the lower limb ( 2 )
Orthopedic surgery 8th injuries to the lower limb ( 2 )Orthopedic surgery 8th injuries to the lower limb ( 2 )
Orthopedic surgery 8th injuries to the lower limb ( 2 )
 
Clinical Serise Hip Widad
Clinical Serise Hip WidadClinical Serise Hip Widad
Clinical Serise Hip Widad
 
Management of Hip Dislocations
Management of Hip DislocationsManagement of Hip Dislocations
Management of Hip Dislocations
 
Patella Instability
Patella InstabilityPatella Instability
Patella Instability
 
ACETABULAR FRACTURE AND MANAGEMENT
ACETABULAR FRACTURE AND MANAGEMENTACETABULAR FRACTURE AND MANAGEMENT
ACETABULAR FRACTURE AND MANAGEMENT
 
All about pelvic
All about pelvicAll about pelvic
All about pelvic
 
Supra condylar humerus fracture in children
Supra condylar humerus fracture in childrenSupra condylar humerus fracture in children
Supra condylar humerus fracture in children
 
Hip dislocation
Hip dislocationHip dislocation
Hip dislocation
 
Proximal humerus fractures
Proximal humerus fracturesProximal humerus fractures
Proximal humerus fractures
 
Non union neck of femur
Non union neck of femurNon union neck of femur
Non union neck of femur
 
L01_Hip-dislocatinos-femoral-head.ppt
L01_Hip-dislocatinos-femoral-head.pptL01_Hip-dislocatinos-femoral-head.ppt
L01_Hip-dislocatinos-femoral-head.ppt
 
Fai and open surgery
Fai and open surgeryFai and open surgery
Fai and open surgery
 
Orthopedics 5th year, 4th lecture (Dr. Ali A.Nabi)
Orthopedics 5th year, 4th lecture (Dr. Ali A.Nabi)Orthopedics 5th year, 4th lecture (Dr. Ali A.Nabi)
Orthopedics 5th year, 4th lecture (Dr. Ali A.Nabi)
 
Injuries around hip joint
Injuries around hip jointInjuries around hip joint
Injuries around hip joint
 
Lateral condyle of humerus fracture in children
Lateral condyle of humerus fracture in childrenLateral condyle of humerus fracture in children
Lateral condyle of humerus fracture in children
 

Recently uploaded

Russian Call Girls Lucknow Just Call 👉👉7877925207 Top Class Call Girl Service...
Russian Call Girls Lucknow Just Call 👉👉7877925207 Top Class Call Girl Service...Russian Call Girls Lucknow Just Call 👉👉7877925207 Top Class Call Girl Service...
Russian Call Girls Lucknow Just Call 👉👉7877925207 Top Class Call Girl Service...
adilkhan87451
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Jogeshwari ! Call Girls Service Mumbai - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 90042684...
Jogeshwari ! Call Girls Service Mumbai - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 90042684...Jogeshwari ! Call Girls Service Mumbai - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 90042684...
Jogeshwari ! Call Girls Service Mumbai - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 90042684...
 
Call Girls Madurai Just Call 9630942363 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Madurai Just Call 9630942363 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Madurai Just Call 9630942363 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Madurai Just Call 9630942363 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Hyderabad Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hyderabad Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Hyderabad Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hyderabad Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Service Jaipur {9521753030} ❤️VVIP RIDDHI Call Girl in Jaipur Raja...
Call Girls Service Jaipur {9521753030} ❤️VVIP RIDDHI Call Girl in Jaipur Raja...Call Girls Service Jaipur {9521753030} ❤️VVIP RIDDHI Call Girl in Jaipur Raja...
Call Girls Service Jaipur {9521753030} ❤️VVIP RIDDHI Call Girl in Jaipur Raja...
 
💕SONAM KUMAR💕Premium Call Girls Jaipur ↘️9257276172 ↙️One Night Stand With Lo...
💕SONAM KUMAR💕Premium Call Girls Jaipur ↘️9257276172 ↙️One Night Stand With Lo...💕SONAM KUMAR💕Premium Call Girls Jaipur ↘️9257276172 ↙️One Night Stand With Lo...
💕SONAM KUMAR💕Premium Call Girls Jaipur ↘️9257276172 ↙️One Night Stand With Lo...
 
Russian Call Girls Lucknow Just Call 👉👉7877925207 Top Class Call Girl Service...
Russian Call Girls Lucknow Just Call 👉👉7877925207 Top Class Call Girl Service...Russian Call Girls Lucknow Just Call 👉👉7877925207 Top Class Call Girl Service...
Russian Call Girls Lucknow Just Call 👉👉7877925207 Top Class Call Girl Service...
 
Coimbatore Call Girls in Coimbatore 7427069034 genuine Escort Service Girl 10...
Coimbatore Call Girls in Coimbatore 7427069034 genuine Escort Service Girl 10...Coimbatore Call Girls in Coimbatore 7427069034 genuine Escort Service Girl 10...
Coimbatore Call Girls in Coimbatore 7427069034 genuine Escort Service Girl 10...
 
Saket * Call Girls in Delhi - Phone 9711199012 Escorts Service at 6k to 50k a...
Saket * Call Girls in Delhi - Phone 9711199012 Escorts Service at 6k to 50k a...Saket * Call Girls in Delhi - Phone 9711199012 Escorts Service at 6k to 50k a...
Saket * Call Girls in Delhi - Phone 9711199012 Escorts Service at 6k to 50k a...
 
Most Beautiful Call Girl in Bangalore Contact on Whatsapp
Most Beautiful Call Girl in Bangalore Contact on WhatsappMost Beautiful Call Girl in Bangalore Contact on Whatsapp
Most Beautiful Call Girl in Bangalore Contact on Whatsapp
 
Manyata Tech Park ( Call Girls ) Bangalore ✔ 6297143586 ✔ Hot Model With Sexy...
Manyata Tech Park ( Call Girls ) Bangalore ✔ 6297143586 ✔ Hot Model With Sexy...Manyata Tech Park ( Call Girls ) Bangalore ✔ 6297143586 ✔ Hot Model With Sexy...
Manyata Tech Park ( Call Girls ) Bangalore ✔ 6297143586 ✔ Hot Model With Sexy...
 
Call Girls Service Jaipur {8445551418} ❤️VVIP BHAWNA Call Girl in Jaipur Raja...
Call Girls Service Jaipur {8445551418} ❤️VVIP BHAWNA Call Girl in Jaipur Raja...Call Girls Service Jaipur {8445551418} ❤️VVIP BHAWNA Call Girl in Jaipur Raja...
Call Girls Service Jaipur {8445551418} ❤️VVIP BHAWNA Call Girl in Jaipur Raja...
 
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
 
Call Girls Ahmedabad Just Call 9630942363 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Ahmedabad Just Call 9630942363 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Ahmedabad Just Call 9630942363 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Ahmedabad Just Call 9630942363 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Best Rate (Patna ) Call Girls Patna ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl In 5 ...
Best Rate (Patna ) Call Girls Patna ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl In 5 ...Best Rate (Patna ) Call Girls Patna ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl In 5 ...
Best Rate (Patna ) Call Girls Patna ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl In 5 ...
 
Models Call Girls In Hyderabad 9630942363 Hyderabad Call Girl & Hyderabad Esc...
Models Call Girls In Hyderabad 9630942363 Hyderabad Call Girl & Hyderabad Esc...Models Call Girls In Hyderabad 9630942363 Hyderabad Call Girl & Hyderabad Esc...
Models Call Girls In Hyderabad 9630942363 Hyderabad Call Girl & Hyderabad Esc...
 
Pondicherry Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Pondicherry Escort Servi...
Pondicherry Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Pondicherry Escort Servi...Pondicherry Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Pondicherry Escort Servi...
Pondicherry Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Pondicherry Escort Servi...
 
Top Rated Hyderabad Call Girls Erragadda ⟟ 9332606886 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine ...
Top Rated  Hyderabad Call Girls Erragadda ⟟ 9332606886 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine ...Top Rated  Hyderabad Call Girls Erragadda ⟟ 9332606886 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine ...
Top Rated Hyderabad Call Girls Erragadda ⟟ 9332606886 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine ...
 
Night 7k to 12k Navi Mumbai Call Girl Photo 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️ night ...
Night 7k to 12k Navi Mumbai Call Girl Photo 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️ night ...Night 7k to 12k Navi Mumbai Call Girl Photo 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️ night ...
Night 7k to 12k Navi Mumbai Call Girl Photo 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️ night ...
 
Trichy Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Trichy Escort Service Available
Trichy Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Trichy Escort Service AvailableTrichy Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Trichy Escort Service Available
Trichy Call Girls Book Now 9630942363 Top Class Trichy Escort Service Available
 
Independent Call Girls In Jaipur { 8445551418 } ✔ ANIKA MEHTA ✔ Get High Prof...
Independent Call Girls In Jaipur { 8445551418 } ✔ ANIKA MEHTA ✔ Get High Prof...Independent Call Girls In Jaipur { 8445551418 } ✔ ANIKA MEHTA ✔ Get High Prof...
Independent Call Girls In Jaipur { 8445551418 } ✔ ANIKA MEHTA ✔ Get High Prof...
 

Femur fracture

  • 1. By : DR. SAEED AHMED ASSITANT PROFESSOR PIMS ORTHO AND TRAUMA DEPARTEMENT
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.  Femoral Head Fractures  Femoral Neck Fractures  Intertrochanteric Fractures  Subtrochanteric Fractures  Femoral Shaft Fractures  Distal Femur Fractures
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.  Femoral head has 3 sources of arterial supply  extracapsular arterial ring  medial circumflex femoral artery (main supply to the head)  from profunda femoris  lateral circumflex femoral artery  ascending cervical branches  artery to the ligamentum teres  from the obturator artery or MCFA  supplies perifoveal area
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.  Associated with hip dislocations -- Anterior hip dislocation. -- Posterior hip dislocation.  location and size of the fracture fragment and degree of comminution depend on the position of the hip at the time of dislocation.
  • 13.  Impaction, avulsion or shear forces involved  unrestrained passenger MVA (knee against dashboard)  falls from height  sports injury  industrial accidents  5-15% of posterior hip dislocations are associated with a femoral head fracture  because of contact between femoral head and posterior rim of acetabulum  anterior hip dislocations usually associated with impaction/indentation fractures of the femoral head
  • 14.
  • 15. Pipkin Classification Type I Fx below fovea/ligamentum (small) Does not involve the weightbearing portion of the femoral head Type II Fx above fovea/ ligamentum (larger) Involves the weightbearing portion of the femoral head Type III Type I or II with associated femoral neck fx High incidence of AVN Type IV Type I or II with associated acetabular fx (usually posterior wall fracture)
  • 16.
  • 17.  History  frontal impact MVA with knee striking dashboard  fall from height  Symptoms  localized hip pain  unable to bear weight  other symptoms associated with impact  Physical exam  inspection  shortened lower limb  with large acetabular wall fractures, little to no rotational asymmetry is seen  posterior dislocation  limb is flexed, adducted, internally rotated  anterior dislocation  limb is flexed, abducted, externally rotated  neurovascular  may have signs of sciatic nerve injury
  • 18.  Radiographs  recommended views  AP pelvis, lateral hip and Judet views  both pre-reduction and post-reduction  inlet and outlet views  if acetabular or pelvic ring injury suspected  CT scan  indications  after reduction  to evaluate:  concentric reduction  loose bodies in the joint  acetabular fracture  femoral head or neck fracture
  • 19.  Nonoperative  hip reduction  indications  acute dislocations  reduce hip dislocation within 6 hours  technique  obtain post reduction CT  TDWB x 4-6 weeks, restrict adduction and internal rotation  indications  Pipkin I  undisplaced Pipkin II with < 1mm step off  no interposed fragments  stable hip joint  technique  perform serial radiographs to document maintained reduction
  • 20.  Operative --ORIF  indications  Pipkin II with > 1mm step off  if performing removal of loose bodies in the joint  associated neck or acetabular fx (Pipkin type III and IV)  polytrauma  irreducible fracture-dislocation  Pipkin IV  treatment dictated by characteristics of acetabular fracture  small posterior wall fragments can be treated nonsurgically and suprafoveal fractures can then be treated through an anterior approach
  • 21.  Arthroplasty  indicationsPipkin I, II (displaced), III, and IV in older patients  Fractures that are significantly displaced, osteoporotic or comminuted
  • 22.
  • 23.  Mechanism  high energy in young patients  low energy falls in older patients
  • 24.  Osteology  normal neck shaft-angle 130 +/- 7 degrees  normal anteversion 10 +/- 7 degrees  Blood supply to femoral head  major contributor is medial femoral circumflex (lateral epiphyseal artery)  some contribution to anterior and inferior head from lateral femoral circumflex  some contribution from inferior gluteal artery  small and insignificant supply from artery of ligamentum teres  displacement of femoral neck fracture will disrupt the blood supply and cause an intracapsular hematoma (effect is controversial)
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.  Symptoms  impacted and stress fractures  slight pain in the groin or pain referred along the medial side of the thigh and knee  displaced fractures  pain in the entire hip region  Physical exam  impacted and stress fractures  no obvious clinical deformity  minor discomfort with active or passive hip range of motion, muscle spasms at extremes of motion  pain with percussion over greater trochanter  displaced fractures  leg in external rotation and abduction, with shortening
  • 31.  Radiographs  recommended views  obtain AP pelvis and cross-table lateral, and full length femur film of ipsilateral side  consider obtaining dedicated imaging of uninjured hip to use as template intraop  traction-internal rotation AP hip is best for defining fracture type  Garden classification is based on AP pelvis  CT  helpful in determining displacement and degree of comminution in some patients
  • 32. Nonoperative  observation alone  indications  may be considered in some patients who are non-ambulators, have minimal pain, and who are at high risk for surgical intervention
  • 33.  cannulated screw fixation  indications  nondisplaced transcervical fx  Garden I and II fracture patterns in the physiologically elderly  displaced transcervical fx in young patient  considered a surgical emergency  achieve reduction to limit vascular insult  reduction must be anatomic, so open if necessary
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.  sliding hip screw or cephalomedullary nail  indications  basicervical fracture  vertical fracture pattern in a young patient  biomechanically superior to cannulated screws  consider placement of additional cannulated screw above sliding hip screw to prevent rotation  hemiarthroplasty  indications  debilitated elderly patients  metabolic bone disease  total hip arthoplasty  indications  older active patients  patients with preexisting hip osteoarthritis  more predictable pain relief and better functional outcome than hemiarthroplasty  arthroplasty for Garden III and IV in patient < 85 years
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.  Extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur between the greater and lesser trochanters.
  • 43.  elderly  low energy falls in osteoporotic patients  young  high energy trauma
  • 44.  intertrochanteric area exists between greater and lesser trochanters  made of dense trabecular bone  calcar femorale  vertical wall of dense bone that extends from posteromedial aspect of femoral shaft to posterior portion of femoral neck  Determines stability
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47.  Physical Exampainful, shortened, externally rotated lower extremity
  • 48.  Radiographs  recommended views  AP pelvis  AP of hip, cross table lateral  full length femur radiographs  CT or MRI  useful if radiographs are negative but physical exam consistent with fracture
  • 49.  sliding hip compression screw  indications  stable intertrochanteric fractures  outcomes  equal outcomes when compared to intramedullary hip screws for stable fracture patterns  intramedullary hip screw (cephalomedullary nail)  indications  stable fracture patterns  unstable fracture patterns  reverse obliquity fractures  56% failure when treated with sliding hip screw  subtrochanteric extension  lack of integrity of femoral wall  associated with increased displacement and collapse when treated with sliding hip screw
  • 50.
  • 51.
  • 52.
  • 53.
  • 54.  Arthroplasty  indications  severely comminuted fractures  preexisting symptomatic degenerative arthritis  osteoporotic bone that is unlikely to hold internal fixation  salvage for failed internal fixation
  • 55.  Subtrochanteric typically defined as area from lesser trochanter to 5cm distal fractures with an associated intertrochanteric component may be called  intertrochanteric fracture with subtrochanteric extension  peritrochanteric fracture
  • 56.
  • 57.
  • 58.  Symptoms  hip and thigh pain  inability to bear weight  Physical exam  pain with motion  typically associated with obvious deformity (shortening and varus alignment)  flexion of proximal fragment may threaten overlying skin
  • 59.  Radiographs  views  AP and lateral of the hip  AP pelvis  full length femur films including the knee  additional views  traction views may assist with defining fragments in comminuted patterns but is not required  findings  bisphosphonate-related fractures have  lateral cortical thickening  transverse fracture orientation  medial spike  lack of comminution
  • 60.
  • 61.  Nonoperative  observation with pain management  indications  non-ambulatory patients with medical co-morbidities that would not allow them to tolerate surgery  limited role due to strong muscular forces displacing fracture and inability to mobilize patients without surgical intervention  Operative  intramedullary nailing (usually cephalomedullary)  indications  historically Russel-Taylor type I fractures  newer design of intramedullary nails has expanded indications  most subtrochanteric fractures treated with IM nail  fixed angle plate  indications  surgeon preference  associated femoral neck fracture  narrow medullary canal  pre-existing femoral shaft deformity
  • 62.
  • 63.
  • 64.
  • 65.
  • 66.
  • 67.
  • 68.  Growth centers of the proximal femurproximal femoral epiphysis  accounts for 13-15% of leg length  accounts for 30% length of femur  proximal femoral physis grows 3 mm/yr  entire lower limb grows 23 mm/yr  trochanteric apophysis  traction apophysis  contributes to femoral neck growth  disordered growth  injury to the GT apophysis leads to shortening of the GT and coxa valga  overgrowth of the GT apophysis leads to coxa vara
  • 69.
  • 70.  Nonoperative --spica cast in abduction, weekly radiographs for 3wks  indications  Type IA, II, III, IV, nondisplaced, <4yrs
  • 71.
  • 72.  Operative emergent ORIF, capsulotomy, or joint aspiration  indications  open hip fracture  vessel injury where large vessel repair is required  concomitant hip dislocation or significant displacement, especially type I  may decrease the rate of AVN (supporting data equivocal)  closed reduction internal fixation (CRIF)/ percutaneous pinning (CRPP)  indications  Type II, displaced  postop spica (abduction and internal rotation) x 6-12wk  Type III and IV, displaced and older children  open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF)  indications  Type IB  pediatric hip screw / DHS  indications  Type IV
  • 73.  Definition. femoral shaft fracture is defined as a fracture of the diaphysis occurring between 5 cm distal to the lesser trochanter and 5 cm proximal to the adductor tubercle  High energy injuries frequently associated with life- threatening conditions
  • 74.  Traumatic  high-energy  most common in younger population  often a result of high-speed motor vehicle accidents  low-energy  more common in elderly  often a result of a fall from standing  gunshot
  • 75.  largest and strongest bone in the body  femur has an anterior bow  linea aspera  rough crest of bone running down middle third of posterior femur  attachment site for various muscles and fascia  acts as a compressive strut to accommodate anterior bow to femur
  • 76.
  • 77.
  • 78. Femur Fracture Classification AO/OTA Femur Diaphysis - Bone segment 32
  • 79.
  • 80.
  • 81.  Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) should be initiated  Symptoms  pain in thigh  Physical exam  inspection  tense, swollen thigh  blood loss in closed femoral shaft fractures is 1000-1500ml  for closed tibial shaft fractures, 500-1000ml  blood loss in open fractures may be double that of closed fractures  affected leg often shortened  tenderness about thigh  motion  examination for ipsilateral femoral neck fracture often difficult secondary to pain from fracture  neurovascular  must record and document distal neurovascular status
  • 82.  recommended views  AP and lateral views of entire femur  AP and lateral views of ipsilateral hip  important to rule-out coexisting femoral neck fracture  AP and lateral views of ipsilateral knee
  • 83.  Nonoperative  long leg cast  indications  nondisplaced femoral shaft fractures in patients with multiple medical comorbidities  Operative  antegrade intramedullary nail with reamed technique  indications  gold standard for treatment of diaphyseal femur fractures  outcomes  stabilization within 24 hours is associated with  decreased pulmonary complications (ARDS)  decreased thromboembolic events  improved rehabilitation  decreased length of stay and cost of hospitalization  exception is a patient with a closed head injury  critical to avoid hypotension and hypoxemia  consider provisional fixation (damage control)
  • 84.  Retrograde intramedullary nail with reamed technique  indications  ipsilateral femoral neck fracture  floating knee (ipsilateral tibial shaft fracture)  use same incision for tibial nail  ipsilateral acetabular fracture  does not compromise surgical approach to acetabulum  multiple system trauma  bilateral femur fractures  avoids repositioning  morbid obesity
  • 85.
  • 86.
  • 87.
  • 88.  ORIF with plate  indications  ipsilateral neck fracture requiring screw fixation  fracture at distal metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction  inability to access medullary canal
  • 89.
  • 90.
  • 91.
  • 92.  Defined as fxs from articular surface to 5cm above metaphyseal flare  Mechanism  young patients  high energy with significant displacement  older patients  low energy in osteoporotic bone with less displacement
  • 93.  anatomical axis of distal femur is 6-7 degrees of valgus  lateral cortex of femur slopes ~10 degrees, medial cortex slopes ~25 degrees
  • 94.
  • 96.  Radiographs  obtain standard AP and Lat  traction views  AP, Lat, and oblique traction views can help characterize injury  CT  obtain with frontal and sagittal reconstructions  useful for  establish intra-articular involvement  identify separate osteochondral fragments in the area of the intercondylar notch  identify coronal plane fx (Hoffa fx)  38% incidence of Hoffa fx's in Type C fractures  preoperative planning  Angiography  indicated when diminished distal pulses after gross alignment restored
  • 97.  open reduction internal fixation  indications  displaced fracture  intra-articular fracture  nonunion  goals  need anatomic reduction of joint  stable fixation of articular component to shaft  preserve vascularity  technique (see below)  postoperative  early ROM of knee important  non-weight bearing or touch toe weight-bearing for 6-8 weeks  quadriceps and hamstring strength exercises
  • 98.  Blade Plate Fixation  Dynamic Condylar Screw Placement  Locked Plate Fixation
  • 99.
  • 100.
  • 101.
  • 102.
  • 103.
  • 104.
  • 105. • retrograde IM nail • indications • good for supracondylar fx without significant comminution • preferred implant in osteoporotic bone • distal femoral replacement • indications • unreconstructable fracture • fracture around prior total knee arthroplasty with loose component
  • 106.
  • 107.  correlated with age due to the increasing thickness of the cortical shaft during skeletal growth and maturity  falls most common cause in toddlers  high energy trauma is responsible for second peak in adolescents  MVC or ped vs vehicle  fractures after minor trauma can be the result of a pathologic process  bone tumors, OI, osteopenia, etc.
  • 108.  Descriptive classification  characteristics of the fracture  transverse  comminuted  spiral etc.  integrity of soft-tissue envelope  open  closed fracture  Stability  length stable fractures  are typically transverse or short oblique  length unstable fractures  are spiral or comminuted fractures
  • 109.  Based on age and size of patient and fracture pattern  Guidelines provided by AAOS
  • 110.
  • 111.
  • 112.  Physeal considerations of the knee general assumptions  leg growth continues until  16 yrs in boys  14 yrs in girls  growth contribution  leg grows 23 mm/year, with most of that coming from the knee (15 mm/yr)  proximal femur - 3 mm / yr (1/8 in)  distal femur - 9 mm / yr (3/8 in)  proximal tibia - 6 mm / yr (1/4 in)  distal tibia - 5 mm / yr (3/16 in)
  • 113.  Symptoms  unable to bear weight  Physical exam  pain and swelling  tenderness along the physis in the presence of a knee effusion  may see varus or valgus knee instability on exam
  • 114.  MRI or ultrasound is now the diagnositic modality of choice when confirmation of a physeal fracture is needed  follow up radiographs after 2-3 weeks of casting can be used as treatment if physeal injury is likely but not identifiable on injury films  stress radiographs to look for opening of the physis were indicated in the past if there was suspicion of physeal injury
  • 115.
  • 116.  Nonoperative  long leg casting  indications  stable nondisplaced fractures  close clinical followup is mandatory
  • 117.  Operative  closed reduction and percutaneous pinning followed by casting  indications  displaced Salter-Harris I or II fractures  displaced fractures successfully reduced with closed methods should still be pinned (undulating physis makes unstable following reduction)  technique  avoid multiple attempts at reduction  avoid physis with hardware if possible  if physis must be crossed (SH I and SH II with small Thurston-Holland fragments), use smooth k-wires  SH II fracture, if possible, should be fixed with lag screws across the metaphyseal segment avoiding the physis  postoperatively follow closely to monitor for deformity
  • 118.  indications  Salter-Harris III and IV in order to anatomically reduce articular surface  irreducible SHI and SHII fractures  reduction often blocked by periosteum infolding into fracture site  techniques  If anatomic reduction cannot be obtained via closed techniques, incision over the displaced physis to remove interposed periosteum is necessary.