SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 45
DIVIDEND AND RETENTION
POLICY


             By :
                       Shafqat Ali
             MBA iv:
             University of Azad Jammu and
             Kashmir Muzaffarabad.

            Dated: 25-02-2013
Introduction
:
   What is Dividend?
   What is dividend policy?
   Theories of Dividend Policy
     Relevant     Theory
       Walter’sModel
       Gordon’s Model

     Irrelevant   Theory
       M-M’s Approach
       Traditional Approach
What is Dividend?

“A dividend is a distribution to shareholders out of
  profit or reserve available for this purpose”.

      - Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Forms/Types of
Dividend
   On the basis of Types of Share
     Equity Dividend
     Preference Dividend

   On the basis of Mode of Payment
     Cash Dividend
     Stock Dividend

     Bond Dividend

     Property Dividend

     Composite Dividend
Cont
                              d.

   On the basis of Time of
    Payment
     InterimDividend
     Regular Dividend

     Special Dividend
What is Dividend
Policy :

   “ Dividend policy determines the division of
    earnings between payments to shareholders
    and retained earnings”.

                        - Weston and Bringham
Cont
                                               d.

Dividend Policies involve the decisions, whether-

   To  retain earnings for capital investment and
    other purposes; or
   To distribute earnings in the form of dividend
    among shareholders; or
   To retain some earning and to distribute
    remaining earnings to shareholders.
Factors Affecting Dividend
Policy
   Legal Restrictions
   Magnitude and trend of earnings
   Desire and type of Shareholders
   Nature of Industry
   Age of the company
   Future Financial Requirements
   Taxation Policy
   Stage of Business cycle
Cont
                                              d.

   Regularity
   Requirements of Institutional Investors
Dimensions of Dividend
Policy
   Pay-out Ratio
     Funds   requirement
     Liquidity

     Access to external sources of financing

     Shareholder preference

     Difference in the cost of External Equity and
      Retained Earnings
     Control

     Taxes
Cont
                                              d.

   Stability
     Stable dividend payout Ratio
     Stable Dividends or Steadily changing
      Dividends
Types of Dividend
Policy
   Regular Dividend Policy
   Stable Dividend Policy
     Constant dividend per share
     Constant pay out ratio

     Stable rupee dividend + extra
      dividend
   Irregular Dividend Policy
Dividend Theories



                                                  Irrelevance Theories
     Relevance Theories
                                              (i.e. which consider dividend
(i.e. which consider dividend
                                              decision to be irrelevant as it
 decision to be relevant as it
                                             does not affects the value of the
affects the value of the firm)
                                                           firm)



     Walter’s                     Gordon’s
     Model                         Model




                            Modigliani and                    Traditional
                            Miller’s Model                    Approach
Walter’s Model
   Prof. James E Walter argued that in the long-
    run the share prices reflect only the present
    value of expected dividends. Retentions
    influence stock price only through their effect
    on future dividends. Walter has formulated this
    and used the dividend to optimize the wealth
    of the equity shareholders.
   Assumptions of Walter’s
    Model:
     Internal  Financing
     constant Return in Cost of
      Capital
     100% payout or Retention

     Constant EPS and DPS

     Infinite time
Formula of Walter’s Model
                       D + r (E-D)
      P       =            k
                           k
Where,
  P       = Current Market Price of equity share
  E       = Earning per share
  D       = Dividend per share
  (E-D) = Retained earning per share
  r    = Rate of Return on firm’s investment or Internal Rate of
  Return
  k       = Cost of Equity Capital
Illustration
:
  Growth Firm (r > k):
r = 20% k = 15% E = Rs. 4
If D = Rs. 4
      P = 4+(0) 0.20 /0 .15 = Rs. 26.67
                0.15
If D = Rs. 2
      P = 2+(2) 0.20 / 0.15 = Rs. 31.11
               0.15
Illustration
:
  Normal Firm (r = k):
r = 15% k = 15% E = Rs. 4
If D = Rs. 4
      P = 4+(0) 0.15 / 0.15 = Rs. 26.67
                0.15
If D = Rs. 2
      P = 2+(2) 0.15 / 0.15 = Rs. 26.67
               0.15
Illustration
:
  Declining Firm (r < k):
r = 10% k = 15% E = Rs. 4
If D = Rs. 4
      P = 4+(0) 0.10 / 0.15 = Rs. 26.67
                 0.15
If D = Rs. 2
      P = 2+(2) 0.10 / 0.15 = Rs. 22.22
                 0.15
Effect of Dividend Policy on Value of
Share
 Case                        If Dividend Payout      If Dividend Payout
                             ratio Increases         Ration decreases

 1. In case of Growing       Market Value of Share   Market Value of a share
 firm i.e. where r > k       decreases               increases

 2. In case of Declining     Market Value of Share   Market Value of share
 firm i.e. where r < k       increases               decreases

 3. In case of normal firm   No change in value of   No change in value of
 i.e. where r = k            Share                   Share
Criticisms of Walter’s
Model
   No External Financing
   Firm’s internal rate of return does not always
    remain constant. In fact, r decreases as more
    and more investment in made.
   Firm’s cost of capital does not always remain
    constant. In fact, k changes directly with the
    firm’s risk.
Gordon’s
    Model
 According to Prof. Gordon, Dividend Policy
  almost always affects the value of the firm. He
  Showed how dividend policy can be used to
  maximize the wealth of the shareholders.
 The main proposition of the model is that the
  value of a share reflects the value of the future
  dividends accruing to that share. Hence, the
  dividend payment and its growth are relevant in
  valuation of shares.
 The model holds that the share’s market price is
  equal to the sum of share’s discounted future
  dividend payment.
   Assumptions:
     Allequity firm
     No external Financing

     Constant Returns

     Constant Cost of Capital

     Perpetual Earnings

     No taxes

     Constant Retention

     Cost of Capital is greater then growth rate
      (k>br=g)
Formula of Gordon’s
Model
              E (1 – b)
     P    =
              K - br

   Where,
    P = Price
    E = Earning per Share
    b = Retention Ratio
    k = Cost of Capital
    br = g = Growth Rate
Illustration
:
  Growth Firm (r > k):
r = 20% k = 15% E = Rs. 4
If b = 0.25
       P0 =       (0.75) 4     = Rs. 30
            0.15- (0.25)(0.20)
If b = 0.50
       P0 =       (0.50) 4     = Rs. 40
            0.15- (0.5)(0.20)
Illustration
:
  Normal Firm (r = k):
r = 15% k = 15% E = Rs. 4
If b = 0.25
       P0 =       (0.75) 4     = Rs. 26.67
            0.15- (0.25)(0.15)
If b = 0.50
       P0 =       (0.50) 4     = Rs. 26.67
            0.15- (0.5)(0.15)
Illustration
:
  Declining Firm (r < k):
r = 10% k = 15% E = Rs. 4
If b = 0.25
       P0 =       (0.75) 4     = Rs. 24
            0.15- (0.25)(0.10)
If b = 0.50
       P0 =       (0.50) 4     = Rs. 20
            0.15- (0.5)(0.10)
Criticisms of Gordon’s
model
   As the assumptions of Walter’s Model
    and Gordon’s Model are same so the
    Gordon’s model suffers from the same
    limitations as the Walter’s Model.
Modigliani & Miller’s Irrelevance
Model

       Value of Firm (i.e. Wealth of Shareholders)


                                  Depends on



                    Firm’s Earnings

                                 Depends on



   Firm’s Investment Policy and not on dividend policy
Modigliani and Miller’s
Approach
   Assumption
     Capital Markets are Perfect and people are
      Rational
     No taxes

     Floating Costs are nil

     Investment opportunities and future profits of
      firms are known with certainty (This assumption
      was dropped later)
     Investment and Dividend Decisions are
      independent
M-M’s Argument
   If a company retains earnings instead of giving
    it out as dividends, the shareholder enjoy
    capital appreciation equal to the amount of
    earnings retained.
   If it distributes earnings by the way of
    dividends instead of retaining it, shareholder
    enjoys dividends equal in value to the amount
    by which his capital would have appreciated
    had the company chosen to retain its earning.
   Hence,
     the division of earnings between dividends and
     retained earnings is IRRELEVANT from the point
     of view of shareholders.
Formula of M-M’s
Approach
                1    ( D1+P1 )
   P     =
             (1 + p)
   o

Where,
 Po = Market price per share at time 0,
 D1 = Dividend per share at time 1,
 P1 = Market price of share at time 1
1    (nD1+nP1)
       nPo    =
                   (1 + p)


   The expression of the outstanding equity
    shares of the firm at time 0 is obtained as:

                     1    {nD1+(n + m)P1- mP1}
      nPo    =
                  (1 + p)
mP1 = I – (X – nD1)
      Where,
       X = Total net profit of the firm for year
       1

nPo          1    [nD1+ (n + m)P1– {I – (X –
       =
         nD1)}]
          (1 + p)
nPo            1    nD1+ (n + m)P1– I +X – nD1
      =
            (1 + p)
nPo          1      (n + m)P1– I +X
      =
          (1 + p)
Criticism of M-M
Model
   No perfect Capital Market
   Existence of Transaction Cost
   Existence of Floatation Cost
   Lack of Relevant Information
   Differential rates of Taxes
   No fixed investment Policy
   Investor’s desire to obtain     current
    income
Traditional Approach
   This theory regards dividend decision merely
    as a part of financing decision because
     The  earnings available may be retained in the
      business for re-investment
     Or if the funds are not required in the business
      they may be distributed as dividends.
   Thus the decision to pay the dividends or
    retain the earnings may be taken as a residual
    decision
   This theory assumes that the investors do
    not differentiate between dividends and
    retentions by the firm
   Thus, a firm should retain the earnings if it
    has profitable investment opportunities
    otherwise it should pay than as dividends.
Synopsis
   Dividend is the part of profit paid to
    Shareholders.
   Firm decide, depending on the profit, the
    percentage of paying dividend.
   Walter and Gordon says that a Dividend
    Decision affects the valuation of the firm.
   While the Traditional Approach and MM’s
    Approach says that Value of the Firm is
    irrelevant to Dividend we pay.
Bibliograph
y


   Google
   Financial management by prasanna
    chandra.
Dividendpolicy by pakistani studend

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

The valuation of stocks ppt @ bec doms
The valuation of stocks ppt @ bec domsThe valuation of stocks ppt @ bec doms
The valuation of stocks ppt @ bec domsBabasab Patil
 
dividend policy and its determinants and constraints
dividend policy and its determinants and constraintsdividend policy and its determinants and constraints
dividend policy and its determinants and constraintsPriyanka Sahoo
 
Operating Leverage - Finacial leverage & Break-Even
Operating Leverage - Finacial leverage & Break-EvenOperating Leverage - Finacial leverage & Break-Even
Operating Leverage - Finacial leverage & Break-EvenAnkesh Gorkhali
 
Business Finance Chapter 7
Business Finance Chapter 7Business Finance Chapter 7
Business Finance Chapter 7Tinku Kumar
 
Different models of dividend policy
Different models of dividend policyDifferent models of dividend policy
Different models of dividend policySunny Mervyne Baa
 
Shareholder value creators in the agricultural
Shareholder value creators in the agriculturalShareholder value creators in the agricultural
Shareholder value creators in the agriculturalAlexander Decker
 
Value and Valuation: Making Sense of LTI Data
Value and Valuation:  Making Sense of LTI DataValue and Valuation:  Making Sense of LTI Data
Value and Valuation: Making Sense of LTI Datafwhittlesey
 
Financial Management Slides Ch 04
Financial Management Slides Ch 04Financial Management Slides Ch 04
Financial Management Slides Ch 04Sayyed Naveed Ali
 
Beasley ch9 v2
Beasley ch9 v2Beasley ch9 v2
Beasley ch9 v2daveferal
 

Mais procurados (11)

The valuation of stocks ppt @ bec doms
The valuation of stocks ppt @ bec domsThe valuation of stocks ppt @ bec doms
The valuation of stocks ppt @ bec doms
 
Dividend Policy
Dividend PolicyDividend Policy
Dividend Policy
 
dividend policy and its determinants and constraints
dividend policy and its determinants and constraintsdividend policy and its determinants and constraints
dividend policy and its determinants and constraints
 
Operating Leverage - Finacial leverage & Break-Even
Operating Leverage - Finacial leverage & Break-EvenOperating Leverage - Finacial leverage & Break-Even
Operating Leverage - Finacial leverage & Break-Even
 
Business Finance Chapter 7
Business Finance Chapter 7Business Finance Chapter 7
Business Finance Chapter 7
 
Different models of dividend policy
Different models of dividend policyDifferent models of dividend policy
Different models of dividend policy
 
Shareholder value creators in the agricultural
Shareholder value creators in the agriculturalShareholder value creators in the agricultural
Shareholder value creators in the agricultural
 
Value and Valuation: Making Sense of LTI Data
Value and Valuation:  Making Sense of LTI DataValue and Valuation:  Making Sense of LTI Data
Value and Valuation: Making Sense of LTI Data
 
Financial Management Slides Ch 04
Financial Management Slides Ch 04Financial Management Slides Ch 04
Financial Management Slides Ch 04
 
Beasley ch9 v2
Beasley ch9 v2Beasley ch9 v2
Beasley ch9 v2
 
Leverage
LeverageLeverage
Leverage
 

Destaque

Mm approach of dividend policy
Mm approach of dividend policyMm approach of dividend policy
Mm approach of dividend policyRodixon94
 
Capital Structure & Dividend Policy
Capital Structure & Dividend PolicyCapital Structure & Dividend Policy
Capital Structure & Dividend PolicyAsHra ReHmat
 
Dividend decision theories
Dividend decision theoriesDividend decision theories
Dividend decision theoriesAyush Jain
 
Presentation on dividend policy
Presentation on dividend policyPresentation on dividend policy
Presentation on dividend policyStudent
 
Topic 5 Dividend Policy
Topic 5 Dividend PolicyTopic 5 Dividend Policy
Topic 5 Dividend Policyshengvn
 
Dividend policy
Dividend policyDividend policy
Dividend policysaravanan
 
Dividend theories
Dividend theoriesDividend theories
Dividend theoriesice456
 
Dividend policy ppt
Dividend policy  pptDividend policy  ppt
Dividend policy pptAayush Kumar
 

Destaque (12)

Mm approach of dividend policy
Mm approach of dividend policyMm approach of dividend policy
Mm approach of dividend policy
 
Dividend policy
Dividend policyDividend policy
Dividend policy
 
Dividend policy
Dividend policyDividend policy
Dividend policy
 
Capital Structure & Dividend Policy
Capital Structure & Dividend PolicyCapital Structure & Dividend Policy
Capital Structure & Dividend Policy
 
Dividend decision theories
Dividend decision theoriesDividend decision theories
Dividend decision theories
 
Presentation on dividend policy
Presentation on dividend policyPresentation on dividend policy
Presentation on dividend policy
 
Dividend policy
Dividend policyDividend policy
Dividend policy
 
Topic 5 Dividend Policy
Topic 5 Dividend PolicyTopic 5 Dividend Policy
Topic 5 Dividend Policy
 
Dividend policy
Dividend policyDividend policy
Dividend policy
 
Dividend theories
Dividend theoriesDividend theories
Dividend theories
 
Dividend policy
Dividend policyDividend policy
Dividend policy
 
Dividend policy ppt
Dividend policy  pptDividend policy  ppt
Dividend policy ppt
 

Semelhante a Dividendpolicy by pakistani studend

Semelhante a Dividendpolicy by pakistani studend (20)

Divident policy
Divident policyDivident policy
Divident policy
 
Financial management
Financial managementFinancial management
Financial management
 
Dividend policy
Dividend policyDividend policy
Dividend policy
 
Dividend policy theories
Dividend policy theoriesDividend policy theories
Dividend policy theories
 
Dividend decision
Dividend decisionDividend decision
Dividend decision
 
Dividend policy
Dividend policyDividend policy
Dividend policy
 
Financial management
Financial managementFinancial management
Financial management
 
Week 6 dividend policy
Week 6  dividend policyWeek 6  dividend policy
Week 6 dividend policy
 
Dividend decision
Dividend decisionDividend decision
Dividend decision
 
Dividend policy
Dividend policyDividend policy
Dividend policy
 
Dippla
DipplaDippla
Dippla
 
Debenture
DebentureDebenture
Debenture
 
Walter And Gordan theories
Walter And Gordan theoriesWalter And Gordan theories
Walter And Gordan theories
 
Dividend theories
Dividend theoriesDividend theories
Dividend theories
 
Dividend policy and firm valuation
Dividend policy and firm valuationDividend policy and firm valuation
Dividend policy and firm valuation
 
Dividend Decisions
Dividend DecisionsDividend Decisions
Dividend Decisions
 
Dividend theories
Dividend theoriesDividend theories
Dividend theories
 
Dividend decision and Theories of Dividend
Dividend decision and Theories of DividendDividend decision and Theories of Dividend
Dividend decision and Theories of Dividend
 
Dividend Decision
 Dividend Decision  Dividend Decision
Dividend Decision
 
Dividend policy000
Dividend policy000Dividend policy000
Dividend policy000
 

Dividendpolicy by pakistani studend

  • 1. DIVIDEND AND RETENTION POLICY By : Shafqat Ali MBA iv: University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Muzaffarabad. Dated: 25-02-2013
  • 2. Introduction :  What is Dividend?  What is dividend policy?  Theories of Dividend Policy  Relevant Theory  Walter’sModel  Gordon’s Model  Irrelevant Theory  M-M’s Approach  Traditional Approach
  • 3. What is Dividend? “A dividend is a distribution to shareholders out of profit or reserve available for this purpose”. - Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
  • 4. Forms/Types of Dividend  On the basis of Types of Share  Equity Dividend  Preference Dividend  On the basis of Mode of Payment  Cash Dividend  Stock Dividend  Bond Dividend  Property Dividend  Composite Dividend
  • 5. Cont d.  On the basis of Time of Payment  InterimDividend  Regular Dividend  Special Dividend
  • 6. What is Dividend Policy :  “ Dividend policy determines the division of earnings between payments to shareholders and retained earnings”. - Weston and Bringham
  • 7. Cont d. Dividend Policies involve the decisions, whether-  To retain earnings for capital investment and other purposes; or  To distribute earnings in the form of dividend among shareholders; or  To retain some earning and to distribute remaining earnings to shareholders.
  • 8. Factors Affecting Dividend Policy  Legal Restrictions  Magnitude and trend of earnings  Desire and type of Shareholders  Nature of Industry  Age of the company  Future Financial Requirements  Taxation Policy  Stage of Business cycle
  • 9. Cont d.  Regularity  Requirements of Institutional Investors
  • 10. Dimensions of Dividend Policy  Pay-out Ratio  Funds requirement  Liquidity  Access to external sources of financing  Shareholder preference  Difference in the cost of External Equity and Retained Earnings  Control  Taxes
  • 11. Cont d.  Stability  Stable dividend payout Ratio  Stable Dividends or Steadily changing Dividends
  • 12. Types of Dividend Policy  Regular Dividend Policy  Stable Dividend Policy  Constant dividend per share  Constant pay out ratio  Stable rupee dividend + extra dividend  Irregular Dividend Policy
  • 13.
  • 14. Dividend Theories Irrelevance Theories Relevance Theories (i.e. which consider dividend (i.e. which consider dividend decision to be irrelevant as it decision to be relevant as it does not affects the value of the affects the value of the firm) firm) Walter’s Gordon’s Model Model Modigliani and Traditional Miller’s Model Approach
  • 15.
  • 16. Walter’s Model  Prof. James E Walter argued that in the long- run the share prices reflect only the present value of expected dividends. Retentions influence stock price only through their effect on future dividends. Walter has formulated this and used the dividend to optimize the wealth of the equity shareholders.
  • 17. Assumptions of Walter’s Model:  Internal Financing  constant Return in Cost of Capital  100% payout or Retention  Constant EPS and DPS  Infinite time
  • 18. Formula of Walter’s Model D + r (E-D) P = k k Where, P = Current Market Price of equity share E = Earning per share D = Dividend per share (E-D) = Retained earning per share r = Rate of Return on firm’s investment or Internal Rate of Return k = Cost of Equity Capital
  • 19. Illustration :  Growth Firm (r > k): r = 20% k = 15% E = Rs. 4 If D = Rs. 4 P = 4+(0) 0.20 /0 .15 = Rs. 26.67 0.15 If D = Rs. 2 P = 2+(2) 0.20 / 0.15 = Rs. 31.11 0.15
  • 20. Illustration :  Normal Firm (r = k): r = 15% k = 15% E = Rs. 4 If D = Rs. 4 P = 4+(0) 0.15 / 0.15 = Rs. 26.67 0.15 If D = Rs. 2 P = 2+(2) 0.15 / 0.15 = Rs. 26.67 0.15
  • 21. Illustration :  Declining Firm (r < k): r = 10% k = 15% E = Rs. 4 If D = Rs. 4 P = 4+(0) 0.10 / 0.15 = Rs. 26.67 0.15 If D = Rs. 2 P = 2+(2) 0.10 / 0.15 = Rs. 22.22 0.15
  • 22. Effect of Dividend Policy on Value of Share Case If Dividend Payout If Dividend Payout ratio Increases Ration decreases 1. In case of Growing Market Value of Share Market Value of a share firm i.e. where r > k decreases increases 2. In case of Declining Market Value of Share Market Value of share firm i.e. where r < k increases decreases 3. In case of normal firm No change in value of No change in value of i.e. where r = k Share Share
  • 23. Criticisms of Walter’s Model  No External Financing  Firm’s internal rate of return does not always remain constant. In fact, r decreases as more and more investment in made.  Firm’s cost of capital does not always remain constant. In fact, k changes directly with the firm’s risk.
  • 24. Gordon’s Model  According to Prof. Gordon, Dividend Policy almost always affects the value of the firm. He Showed how dividend policy can be used to maximize the wealth of the shareholders.  The main proposition of the model is that the value of a share reflects the value of the future dividends accruing to that share. Hence, the dividend payment and its growth are relevant in valuation of shares.  The model holds that the share’s market price is equal to the sum of share’s discounted future dividend payment.
  • 25. Assumptions:  Allequity firm  No external Financing  Constant Returns  Constant Cost of Capital  Perpetual Earnings  No taxes  Constant Retention  Cost of Capital is greater then growth rate (k>br=g)
  • 26. Formula of Gordon’s Model E (1 – b) P = K - br  Where, P = Price E = Earning per Share b = Retention Ratio k = Cost of Capital br = g = Growth Rate
  • 27. Illustration :  Growth Firm (r > k): r = 20% k = 15% E = Rs. 4 If b = 0.25 P0 = (0.75) 4 = Rs. 30 0.15- (0.25)(0.20) If b = 0.50 P0 = (0.50) 4 = Rs. 40 0.15- (0.5)(0.20)
  • 28. Illustration :  Normal Firm (r = k): r = 15% k = 15% E = Rs. 4 If b = 0.25 P0 = (0.75) 4 = Rs. 26.67 0.15- (0.25)(0.15) If b = 0.50 P0 = (0.50) 4 = Rs. 26.67 0.15- (0.5)(0.15)
  • 29. Illustration :  Declining Firm (r < k): r = 10% k = 15% E = Rs. 4 If b = 0.25 P0 = (0.75) 4 = Rs. 24 0.15- (0.25)(0.10) If b = 0.50 P0 = (0.50) 4 = Rs. 20 0.15- (0.5)(0.10)
  • 30. Criticisms of Gordon’s model  As the assumptions of Walter’s Model and Gordon’s Model are same so the Gordon’s model suffers from the same limitations as the Walter’s Model.
  • 31.
  • 32. Modigliani & Miller’s Irrelevance Model Value of Firm (i.e. Wealth of Shareholders) Depends on Firm’s Earnings Depends on Firm’s Investment Policy and not on dividend policy
  • 33. Modigliani and Miller’s Approach  Assumption  Capital Markets are Perfect and people are Rational  No taxes  Floating Costs are nil  Investment opportunities and future profits of firms are known with certainty (This assumption was dropped later)  Investment and Dividend Decisions are independent
  • 34. M-M’s Argument  If a company retains earnings instead of giving it out as dividends, the shareholder enjoy capital appreciation equal to the amount of earnings retained.  If it distributes earnings by the way of dividends instead of retaining it, shareholder enjoys dividends equal in value to the amount by which his capital would have appreciated had the company chosen to retain its earning.
  • 35. Hence, the division of earnings between dividends and retained earnings is IRRELEVANT from the point of view of shareholders.
  • 36. Formula of M-M’s Approach 1 ( D1+P1 ) P = (1 + p) o Where, Po = Market price per share at time 0, D1 = Dividend per share at time 1, P1 = Market price of share at time 1
  • 37. 1 (nD1+nP1) nPo = (1 + p)  The expression of the outstanding equity shares of the firm at time 0 is obtained as: 1 {nD1+(n + m)P1- mP1} nPo = (1 + p)
  • 38. mP1 = I – (X – nD1) Where, X = Total net profit of the firm for year 1 nPo 1 [nD1+ (n + m)P1– {I – (X – = nD1)}] (1 + p) nPo 1 nD1+ (n + m)P1– I +X – nD1 = (1 + p)
  • 39. nPo 1 (n + m)P1– I +X = (1 + p)
  • 40. Criticism of M-M Model  No perfect Capital Market  Existence of Transaction Cost  Existence of Floatation Cost  Lack of Relevant Information  Differential rates of Taxes  No fixed investment Policy  Investor’s desire to obtain current income
  • 41. Traditional Approach  This theory regards dividend decision merely as a part of financing decision because  The earnings available may be retained in the business for re-investment  Or if the funds are not required in the business they may be distributed as dividends.  Thus the decision to pay the dividends or retain the earnings may be taken as a residual decision
  • 42. This theory assumes that the investors do not differentiate between dividends and retentions by the firm  Thus, a firm should retain the earnings if it has profitable investment opportunities otherwise it should pay than as dividends.
  • 43. Synopsis  Dividend is the part of profit paid to Shareholders.  Firm decide, depending on the profit, the percentage of paying dividend.  Walter and Gordon says that a Dividend Decision affects the valuation of the firm.  While the Traditional Approach and MM’s Approach says that Value of the Firm is irrelevant to Dividend we pay.
  • 44. Bibliograph y  Google  Financial management by prasanna chandra.