SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 54
Proposed Elementary SchoolBoundary ChangesPresentation of Plan 0 Southwest Elementary SchoolFacility Use and Boundary Task Force November 3, 2009
Introduction Starting point for FUBTF discussion Proposal for meeting the four criteria for boundary changes Capacity Family Impact Feeder Pattern Stability Initiate discussion on key issues: Current and projected population changes Access and proximity to school Neighborhood issues and concerns Identify options for FUBTF decisions 2
Assumption Student population projections are from the 2009 demographic report 3
Definitions Population: The number of students who reside in a school’s attendance zone Membership: The number of students who attend a school. Permanent Capacity: The capacity of a school base on the number of permanent classroom and the size of the core facilities: gym, library, and cafeteria. Does not include portables. Functional Capacity: The capacity of a school based on the number of permanent and portable classrooms but not including classes used for district-wide uses and Special Education classes and the size of the core facilities. 4
Abbreviations PP:	Projected Population PC:	Permanent Capacity 5
FUBTF Boundary Criteria Capacity: Achieve capacity targets that ensure efficient operation of facilities Family Impact: Affect the fewest students possible Feeder pattern: Attend to the alignment of feeder patterns, as reasonable, and balanced against other criteria Stability: Prevent multiple reassignment of students among schools by developing stable, long-term assignment plans 6
Process At the last FUBTF meeting, the FUBTF decided to start the process by creating the attendance zone for the new SWES The first step will focus on relieving Clayton ES The presentation of Plan 0 will be provided in three steps. Create the attendance zone for the new SWES Provide relief for over-crowded schools Increase student population at under-capacity schools 7
Step One Create Attendance Zone for new Southwest Elementary School 8
2010 PP: 1,262 (143% PC) 2013 PP: 1,553 (176% PC) 9
Clayton 10
Clayton Planning Areas:  193E, 195P, 195R, 195A 2010 PP: 781 (89% PC) 2013 PP: 895 (102% PC)	 ) 11
SWES Planning Areas:  195C, 195D, PA between US Hwy 290 and FM 1826 2010 PP: 481 (68% PC) 2013 PP: 658 (93% PC) 12
SWES Clayton 2010 PP: 481 (68% PC) 2013 PP: 658 (93% PC) 2010 PP: 781 (89% PC) 2013 PP: 895 (102% PC)	 ) 13
Step Two Provide Relief for  Over-Crowded Schools: Oak Hill and Mills Elementary Schools 14
Relief for Oak Hill ES Option1: Oak Hill ES and SWES Option 2: Oak Hill ES and Patton ES Option 3: Oak Hill ES and Sunset Valley ES
Relief for Oak Hill ES Option1: Oak Hill ES and SWES Option 2: Oak Hill ES and Patton ES Option 3: Oak Hill ES and Sunset Valley ES
Oak Hill 2010 PP: 1,099 (128% PC) 2013 PP: 1,204 (140% PC)	 17
Oak Hill Access to US Hwy 290 from Planning Areas:  149A, 149B, 149D 2009 PP: 21 2013 PP: 32 18
Oak Hill Access to US Hwy 290 from Planning Areas:  149C, and 149E 2009 PP: 37 2013 PP: 37 19
Oak Hill Planning Areas 149F and 149G have no current or projected students For all  Seven planning areas: 2009 PP:  58 2013 PP:  69 20
Oak Hill Concerns: ,[object Object]
The SWES would open with 542 students (77% of PC) and increase to 727 students by 2013 (103% of PC)21
Relief for Oak Hill ES Option1: Oak Hill ES and SWES Option 2: Oak Hill ES and Patton ES Option 3: Oak Hill ES and Sunset Valley ES
Oak Hill Access to US Hwy 290 from Planning Areas:  249B, 249E, 249A, 249D 23
Oak Hill Access to US Hwy 290 from Planning Areas:  249B, 249E, 249A, 249D 2009 Projected Students: 184 2013 Projected Students: 224 24
Oak Hill ,[object Object]
For 2010, Patton population would increase from 644 students (70% PC) to 836 (90%); but decrease slightly to 808 (87%) by 2013.25
Relief for Oak Hill ES Option1: Oak Hill ES and SWES Option 2: Oak Hill ES and Patton ES Option 3: Oak Hill ES and Sunset Valley ES
Oak Hill Access to US Hwy 290 or Mopac from Planning Areas:  49O, 49M 27
Oak Hill Access to US Hwy 290 from Planning Areas:  49O, 49M 2009 Projected Students: 27 2013 Projected Students: 43 28
Oak Hill Concerns: ,[object Object]
For the 2010 school year, Sunset Valley ES would have 567 students (73% of PC) and increase to 628 by 2013 (81% of PC).29
SWES Oak Hill 2010 PP: 542 (77% PC) 2013 PP: 727 (103% PC) 2010 PP: 816 (95% PC) 2013 PP: 868 (101% PC) 30
Sunset Valley Patton 2010 PP: 567 (73% PC) 2013 PP: 628 (81% PC) 2010 PP: 836 (90% PC) 2013 PP: 808 (101% PC) 31
Relief for Mills ES Mills ES and Kiker ES
Mills Kiker 2010 Population: 1,015 (121% PC) 2013 Population:   990 (118% PC)	 ,[object Object]
2013 population:  666 (82% PC)33
Mills ,[object Object]
 The southern portion of adjacent planning area 96H2 only has access of Beckett and does not connect to adjacent neighborhoods.
2009 PP: 9634
Mills 35
Mills Three contiguous planning areas would be included:  96E, 96G, 96H1 96E has five students and planning areas 96G and 96H1 have no students. 36
Existing Mills ES and Kiker ES boundaries 37
Mills Kiker ,[object Object]
2013 PP:  885 (106%)
2010 PP:  762 (94%)
2013 PP:  771 (95%)38
Step Three Increase Student Population of  Under – Capacity Schools: Sunset Valley  and Boone Elementary Schools 39
Boone ,[object Object]
2013 population:  472 (56%)40
Boone Access to William Cannon Blvd and  Brodie Lane :173B and 173A 2009 Projected Students: 27 2013 Projected Students: 43 41
Boone Access to William Cannon Blvd and  BrodieLane :173B and 173A 2010 Projected Students: 27 2013 Projected Students: 41 42
Boone Sunset Valley ,[object Object]
2013 PP:  513 (61%)

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a Bond Swes Plan0 Presentation (7)

Tour of UCSC Campus Housing Strategies and Stock
Tour of UCSC Campus Housing Strategies and StockTour of UCSC Campus Housing Strategies and Stock
Tour of UCSC Campus Housing Strategies and Stock
 
Presentation
PresentationPresentation
Presentation
 
Mills Elementary Cac Presentation 3 5 09
Mills Elementary Cac Presentation 3 5 09Mills Elementary Cac Presentation 3 5 09
Mills Elementary Cac Presentation 3 5 09
 
TCAPS Steering Comm. 120406
TCAPS Steering Comm. 120406TCAPS Steering Comm. 120406
TCAPS Steering Comm. 120406
 
Board LRMP Presentation 7-9-07 Revised
Board LRMP Presentation 7-9-07 RevisedBoard LRMP Presentation 7-9-07 Revised
Board LRMP Presentation 7-9-07 Revised
 
TCAPS' School Closing Criteria
TCAPS' School Closing CriteriaTCAPS' School Closing Criteria
TCAPS' School Closing Criteria
 
Distributed Learning Achievement in BC: Collecting and Reporting Results
Distributed Learning Achievement in BC: Collecting and Reporting ResultsDistributed Learning Achievement in BC: Collecting and Reporting Results
Distributed Learning Achievement in BC: Collecting and Reporting Results
 

Mais de Mills Rep (14)

AISD 2010 Strategic Plan
AISD 2010 Strategic PlanAISD 2010 Strategic Plan
AISD 2010 Strategic Plan
 
AISD 2010 Strategic Plan
AISD 2010 Strategic PlanAISD 2010 Strategic Plan
AISD 2010 Strategic Plan
 
Jan 5 Comment Card Analysis
Jan 5 Comment Card AnalysisJan 5 Comment Card Analysis
Jan 5 Comment Card Analysis
 
Schools East Of Mopac West Of 35
Schools East Of Mopac West Of 35Schools East Of Mopac West Of 35
Schools East Of Mopac West Of 35
 
Sort of Schools East Of Mopac West Of 35
Sort of Schools East Of Mopac West Of 35Sort of Schools East Of Mopac West Of 35
Sort of Schools East Of Mopac West Of 35
 
SWES Plan1
SWES Plan1SWES Plan1
SWES Plan1
 
UPDATED: Bond Swes Plan0
UPDATED: Bond Swes Plan0UPDATED: Bond Swes Plan0
UPDATED: Bond Swes Plan0
 
Bond Swes Plan0
Bond Swes Plan0Bond Swes Plan0
Bond Swes Plan0
 
Approved FUBTF Priorities/Charge
Approved FUBTF Priorities/ChargeApproved FUBTF Priorities/Charge
Approved FUBTF Priorities/Charge
 
Bond 2004 Swes Orientation 20091014
Bond 2004 Swes Orientation 20091014Bond 2004 Swes Orientation 20091014
Bond 2004 Swes Orientation 20091014
 
Bond 2004 Swes Orientation 20091014
Bond 2004 Swes Orientation 20091014Bond 2004 Swes Orientation 20091014
Bond 2004 Swes Orientation 20091014
 
Existing Boundaries 2009
Existing Boundaries 2009Existing Boundaries 2009
Existing Boundaries 2009
 
Boundary Survey Results
Boundary Survey ResultsBoundary Survey Results
Boundary Survey Results
 
Mills Elementary Boundary Info Presentation
Mills Elementary Boundary Info PresentationMills Elementary Boundary Info Presentation
Mills Elementary Boundary Info Presentation
 

Último

The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 

Último (20)

ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
 
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptxOn_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
 
How to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptx
How to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptxHow to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptx
How to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptx
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
 
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdfUnit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
 
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptxHMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptxCOMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
 
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structureSingle or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
 
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docxPython Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
 
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdfUGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
 
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
 
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptxTowards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
 

Bond Swes Plan0 Presentation

  • 1. Proposed Elementary SchoolBoundary ChangesPresentation of Plan 0 Southwest Elementary SchoolFacility Use and Boundary Task Force November 3, 2009
  • 2. Introduction Starting point for FUBTF discussion Proposal for meeting the four criteria for boundary changes Capacity Family Impact Feeder Pattern Stability Initiate discussion on key issues: Current and projected population changes Access and proximity to school Neighborhood issues and concerns Identify options for FUBTF decisions 2
  • 3. Assumption Student population projections are from the 2009 demographic report 3
  • 4. Definitions Population: The number of students who reside in a school’s attendance zone Membership: The number of students who attend a school. Permanent Capacity: The capacity of a school base on the number of permanent classroom and the size of the core facilities: gym, library, and cafeteria. Does not include portables. Functional Capacity: The capacity of a school based on the number of permanent and portable classrooms but not including classes used for district-wide uses and Special Education classes and the size of the core facilities. 4
  • 5. Abbreviations PP: Projected Population PC: Permanent Capacity 5
  • 6. FUBTF Boundary Criteria Capacity: Achieve capacity targets that ensure efficient operation of facilities Family Impact: Affect the fewest students possible Feeder pattern: Attend to the alignment of feeder patterns, as reasonable, and balanced against other criteria Stability: Prevent multiple reassignment of students among schools by developing stable, long-term assignment plans 6
  • 7. Process At the last FUBTF meeting, the FUBTF decided to start the process by creating the attendance zone for the new SWES The first step will focus on relieving Clayton ES The presentation of Plan 0 will be provided in three steps. Create the attendance zone for the new SWES Provide relief for over-crowded schools Increase student population at under-capacity schools 7
  • 8. Step One Create Attendance Zone for new Southwest Elementary School 8
  • 9. 2010 PP: 1,262 (143% PC) 2013 PP: 1,553 (176% PC) 9
  • 11. Clayton Planning Areas: 193E, 195P, 195R, 195A 2010 PP: 781 (89% PC) 2013 PP: 895 (102% PC) ) 11
  • 12. SWES Planning Areas: 195C, 195D, PA between US Hwy 290 and FM 1826 2010 PP: 481 (68% PC) 2013 PP: 658 (93% PC) 12
  • 13. SWES Clayton 2010 PP: 481 (68% PC) 2013 PP: 658 (93% PC) 2010 PP: 781 (89% PC) 2013 PP: 895 (102% PC) ) 13
  • 14. Step Two Provide Relief for Over-Crowded Schools: Oak Hill and Mills Elementary Schools 14
  • 15. Relief for Oak Hill ES Option1: Oak Hill ES and SWES Option 2: Oak Hill ES and Patton ES Option 3: Oak Hill ES and Sunset Valley ES
  • 16. Relief for Oak Hill ES Option1: Oak Hill ES and SWES Option 2: Oak Hill ES and Patton ES Option 3: Oak Hill ES and Sunset Valley ES
  • 17. Oak Hill 2010 PP: 1,099 (128% PC) 2013 PP: 1,204 (140% PC) 17
  • 18. Oak Hill Access to US Hwy 290 from Planning Areas: 149A, 149B, 149D 2009 PP: 21 2013 PP: 32 18
  • 19. Oak Hill Access to US Hwy 290 from Planning Areas: 149C, and 149E 2009 PP: 37 2013 PP: 37 19
  • 20. Oak Hill Planning Areas 149F and 149G have no current or projected students For all Seven planning areas: 2009 PP: 58 2013 PP: 69 20
  • 21.
  • 22. The SWES would open with 542 students (77% of PC) and increase to 727 students by 2013 (103% of PC)21
  • 23. Relief for Oak Hill ES Option1: Oak Hill ES and SWES Option 2: Oak Hill ES and Patton ES Option 3: Oak Hill ES and Sunset Valley ES
  • 24. Oak Hill Access to US Hwy 290 from Planning Areas: 249B, 249E, 249A, 249D 23
  • 25. Oak Hill Access to US Hwy 290 from Planning Areas: 249B, 249E, 249A, 249D 2009 Projected Students: 184 2013 Projected Students: 224 24
  • 26.
  • 27. For 2010, Patton population would increase from 644 students (70% PC) to 836 (90%); but decrease slightly to 808 (87%) by 2013.25
  • 28. Relief for Oak Hill ES Option1: Oak Hill ES and SWES Option 2: Oak Hill ES and Patton ES Option 3: Oak Hill ES and Sunset Valley ES
  • 29. Oak Hill Access to US Hwy 290 or Mopac from Planning Areas: 49O, 49M 27
  • 30. Oak Hill Access to US Hwy 290 from Planning Areas: 49O, 49M 2009 Projected Students: 27 2013 Projected Students: 43 28
  • 31.
  • 32. For the 2010 school year, Sunset Valley ES would have 567 students (73% of PC) and increase to 628 by 2013 (81% of PC).29
  • 33. SWES Oak Hill 2010 PP: 542 (77% PC) 2013 PP: 727 (103% PC) 2010 PP: 816 (95% PC) 2013 PP: 868 (101% PC) 30
  • 34. Sunset Valley Patton 2010 PP: 567 (73% PC) 2013 PP: 628 (81% PC) 2010 PP: 836 (90% PC) 2013 PP: 808 (101% PC) 31
  • 35. Relief for Mills ES Mills ES and Kiker ES
  • 36.
  • 37. 2013 population: 666 (82% PC)33
  • 38.
  • 39. The southern portion of adjacent planning area 96H2 only has access of Beckett and does not connect to adjacent neighborhoods.
  • 42. Mills Three contiguous planning areas would be included: 96E, 96G, 96H1 96E has five students and planning areas 96G and 96H1 have no students. 36
  • 43. Existing Mills ES and Kiker ES boundaries 37
  • 44.
  • 45. 2013 PP: 885 (106%)
  • 46. 2010 PP: 762 (94%)
  • 47. 2013 PP: 771 (95%)38
  • 48. Step Three Increase Student Population of Under – Capacity Schools: Sunset Valley and Boone Elementary Schools 39
  • 49.
  • 50. 2013 population: 472 (56%)40
  • 51. Boone Access to William Cannon Blvd and Brodie Lane :173B and 173A 2009 Projected Students: 27 2013 Projected Students: 43 41
  • 52. Boone Access to William Cannon Blvd and BrodieLane :173B and 173A 2010 Projected Students: 27 2013 Projected Students: 41 42
  • 53.
  • 54. 2013 PP: 513 (61%)
  • 55. 2010 PP: 541 (70%)
  • 56. 2013 PP: 587 (76%)43
  • 59. 46
  • 60. Criteria Capacity: Achieve capacity targets that ensure efficient operation of facilities Family Impact: Affect the fewest students possible Feeder pattern: Attend to the alignment of feeder patterns, as reasonable, and balanced against other criteria Stability: Prevent multiple reassignment of students among schools by developing stable, long-term assignment plans 47
  • 62. 2010-11 School Year: Existing vs. Plan 0 Boundaries 49
  • 63. 2013-14 School Year: Existing vs. Plan 0 Boundaries 50
  • 64. Criteria 1: Capacity Seven of eight schools remain within 75% to 115% of permanent capacity by the 2013-14 school year The most crowded school is Mills ES is at 106% but its population begins to slowly decrease 51
  • 65. Criteria 2: Family ImpactCriteria 4: Stability Changes between Sunset Valley ES and Boone ES 52
  • 66. Criteria 3: Feeder Pattern Oak Hill to SWES Oak Hill to Sunset Valley ES 53