SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 122
Baixar para ler offline
This Week’s Playlist
Artist Song / Psych Concept
1. Justin Bieber ft. Ludacris
All Around The World
(Universal Need To Belong)
2. Phillip Phillips
Home
(Secure Attachment/Secure Base)
3. Nelly Furtado
I’m Like A Bird
(Avoidant Attachment)
4. P!nk
Please Don’t Leave Me
(Anxious Attachment)
5. Calvin Harris
Feel So Close
(Propinquity)
6. Good Charlotte
Girls & Boys
(Gender Differences In Mate Preferences)
7. Bruno Mars
Just The Way You Are
(Idealization)
Chapter 10







Attraction & Relationships
Melanie B. Tannenbaum, M.A.
Psychology 201
Spring 2014
Important Points
Characterizing Relationships
Why are relationships important?
How do people form relationships with each other?
Attraction
What causes us to be attracted to other people?
What are the sex differences in attraction?
Romantic Relationships
What is love?
What determines if we’re romantically happy?
How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
Important Points
Characterizing Relationships
Why are relationships important?
How do people form relationships with each other?
Attraction
What causes us to be attracted to other people?
What are the sex differences in attraction?
Romantic Relationships
What is love?
What determines if we’re romantically happy?
How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
Harlow’s Monkeys
Infant rhesus monkeys put in a cage with two different “mothers”
The “cloth mother” looked like a monkey, but couldn’t give milk
The “wire mother” didn’t look like a monkey, but it could give milk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_O60TYAIgC4
Harlow’s Monkeys
The monkeys clung to the cloth mother and went to it for comfort when
they felt threatened.
They only approached the wire mother when hungry, and sometimes
starved before leaving the cloth mother.
Infant monkeys preferred warmth and comfort over food!
Need to Belong
This hints at an important core need...the need to belong.
Relationships help people survive
Parent-child attachments help keep babies safe
Friendships help non-family members cooperate and thrive
We need other people to help us survive!
Need to Belong
The need to belong is universal. What does that mean?
!
Cultures around the world show certain behaviors, like...
Caregiving between mother and child
Wrestling between siblings
Flirtation among young people who are looking for love
Affection between romantic partners
Dominance displays between adolescent males
!
Supports the idea of an evolutionary basis for the need to belong.
Relationships Are Important!
Mortality rates higher among divorced, unmarried, & widowed
!
Suicide/crime rates are higher for single and divorced people
!
Social support strengthens cardiovascular, immune, and endocrine systems
!
Harlow’s monkeys who were raised in isolation were highly fearful, unable to
interact with peers, and inappropriately sexual as adolescents
!
Relationships also shape our sense of who we are!
Remember the relational self from Chapter 3
Attachment Theory
Which description best fits your relationships?
A. I find it relatively easy to get close to others and am comfortable
depending on them and having them depend on me. I don’t often worry
about being abandoned or about someone getting too close to me.
C. I am somewhat uncomfortable being close to others. I find it difficult to
trust them completely, difficult to allow myself to depend on them. I am
nervous when anyone gets too close, and romantic partners often want me
to be more intimate than I’m comfortable with.
B. I find that others are reluctant to get as close as I would like. I often worry
that my partner doesn’t really love me or won’t want to stay with me. I want
to merge with my partner, and this desire sometimes scares people away.
Attachment Theory
John Bowlby
!
Human infants are born with few survival skills; children rely on parents for
security, which allows them to explore the environment and learn
!
Attachment Theory: Theory about how our early attachments with our
parents shape our relationships for the rest of our lives
!
Infants must develop a relationship with at least one caregiver for social/
emotional development to occur normally; this provides a schema that is
automatically applied to later relationships
Developmental Trajectory
1. Proximity Seeking (2 – 6 months)
2. Safe Haven (8 – 10 months)
3. Secure Base (1 year)
Developmental Trajectory
1. Proximity Seeking (2 – 6 months)
2. Safe Haven (8 – 10 months)
3. Secure Base (1 year)
The developmental order is similar in adult relationships!
Developmental Trajectory
1. Proximity Seeking (2 – 6 months)
2. Safe Haven (8 – 10 months)
3. Secure Base (1 year)
The developmental order is similar in adult relationships!
Working Models
Working Model: Schema for how others tend to treat you in relationships
!
!
Expectations about partner’s availability, warmth, and security.
!
!
Over time, these become solidified and exert an automatic influence on
behavior (you expect people to react in fairly stable, predictable ways).
Attachment Theory: Infants
Mary Ainsworth
Strange Situation Paradigm
Simple test to assess infant attachment to caregiver
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTsewNrHUHU
!
Infant and Caregiver enter an unfamiliar room with toys
Stranger walks in, Caregiver leaves
Caregiver returns after 3 minutes
How did the infant respond after the caregiver returned?
Three Attachment Styles
!
1. Secure Attachment (62%)
!
2. Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment (15%)
!
3. Avoidant Attachment (23%)
Secure Attachment
Generally trusting
!
Infant: Actively explores the room
when Mom is around, upset when
Mom leaves, and happy when Mom
returns.
!
Caregiver: Responds quickly and
reliably to cries, responsive to child’s
individual needs.
Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment
Generally fearful, angry, distraught
!
Infant: Clings to Mom when she is
around, upset when Mom leaves,
angry or still upset when Mom returns.
!
Caregiver: Tends to be unpredictable;
sometimes intrudes on the child’s
activities, sometimes rejects or ignores
the child. Guided by whatever she
wants to do.
Avoidant Attachment
Generally aloof, dismissive.
!
Infant: Ignores Mom when she is
around, doesn’t care when she
leaves, continues to ignore her when
she returns.
!
Caregiver: Ignores child, doesn’t pay
attention to infant’s wants or needs.
Adult Attachment
Infant styles provide working models for our relationships as adults.
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Secure Attachment
Comfortable with intimacy
Want to be close to others during threat/uncertainty
Adult Attachment
Infant styles provide working models for our relationships as adults.
!
Secure Attachment
Comfortable with intimacy
Want to be close to others during threat/uncertainty
Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment
Constantly expresses worries/concerns about relationships
Excessively seeks closeness during threat/uncertainty
!
Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment
Constantly expresses worries/concerns about relationships
Excessively seeks closeness during threat/uncertainty
Adult Attachment
Infant styles provide working models for our relationships as adults.
!
Secure Attachment
Comfortable with intimacy
Want to be close to others during threat/uncertainty
Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment
Constantly expresses worries/concerns about relationships
Excessively seeks closeness during threat/uncertainty
!
Avoidant Attachment
Prefers distance; shows compulsive self-reliance
Uncomfortable with intimacy
Dismissive and detached during threat/uncertainty
Adult Attachment
Infant styles provide working models for our relationships as adults.
!
Secure Attachment
Comfortable with intimacy
Want to be close to others during threat/uncertainty
Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment
Constantly expresses worries/concerns about relationships
Excessively seeks closeness during threat/uncertainty
Avoidant Attachment
Prefers distance; shows compulsive self-reliance
Uncomfortable with intimacy
Dismissive and detached during threat/uncertainty
Test Your Knowledge
What’s This Attachment Style?
I am comfortable without close emotional relationships. It is very important
to me to feel independent and self-sufficient. I prefer not to depend on
others or have others depend on me. Romantic partners often want me to
be more intimate than I am comfortable with.
!
A) Secure Attachment
B) Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment
C) Avoidant Attachment
Test Your Knowledge
What’s This Attachment Style?
I find it relatively easy to get close to others and am comfortable
depending on them and having them depend on me. I don’t often worry
about being abandoned or about someone getting too close to me.
!
A) Secure Attachment
B) Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment
C) Avoidant Attachment
Test Your Knowledge
What’s This Attachment Style?
I find that others are reluctant to get as close as I would like. I often worry
that my partner doesn’t really love me or won’t want to stay with me. I
want to merge with my partner, and this sometimes scares people away.
!
A) Secure Attachment
B) Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment
C) Avoidant Attachment
Attachment Styles
Find out what your attachment style is:
http://www.web-research-design.net/cgi-bin/crq/crq.pl
!
Adult attachment style is relatively stable
!
Important schema are typically very difficult to change
Require a lot of counter-evidence
Must update automatic and deliberate aspects of schema
Must overcome self-fulfilling prophecies
Attachment Styles
However...this doesn’t mean that all relationships are the same.
!
Baldwin et al. (1996)
Participants listed 10 important relationships
Indicated their attachment style in each one
Over 50% of participants had experienced all 3 major attachment
styles at some point or another
!
Everyone can be secure/anxious/avoidant, especially if you end
up dating someone who “brings out” the best (or worst) in you
Securely Attached People...
Are more likely to be married
Have fewer marital problems
!
Over four years...
Only 26% of secure participants broke up with their partners
44% of anxious participants went through a break-up
52% of avoidant participants went through a break-up
!
Generally, secure is good. Try to aim for secure relationships!
One Important Caveat!!
During this section, we’ve spoken a lot about the importance of
having loving, attentive caregivers.
This is not meant to say ANYTHING at all about the relative merits
of being a stay-at-home or working mother.
Huge, important, famous NICHD study on early childcare:
Absolutely no difference in all important outcomes between kids raised
by stay-at-home or working mothers.
The only important thing is that when parents are home, they have
high-quality, caring interactions with their children.
The infants in these examples that are “deprived of maternal
affection” are typically orphans who receive no love/care.
Important Points
Characterizing Relationships
Why are relationships important?
How do people form relationships with each other?
Attraction
What causes us to be attracted to other people?
What are the sex differences in attraction?
Romantic Relationships
What is love?
What determines if we’re romantically happy?
How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
Important Points
Characterizing Relationships
Need To Belong
Attachment Styles
Attraction
What causes us to be attracted to other people?
What are the sex differences in attraction?
Romantic Relationships
What is love?
What determines if we’re romantically happy?
How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
Important Points
Characterizing Relationships
Need To Belong
Attachment Styles
Attraction
What causes us to be attracted to other people?
What are the sex differences in attraction?
Romantic Relationships
What is love?
What determines if we’re romantically happy?
How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
Where did you meet your 

best friend at UIUC?
A) In a dorm or shared living space (Greek house, etc.)
B) In a class
C) Through friends or friends-of-friends
D) Through a club/team that you attend frequently
E) None of the above
Attraction: Three Variables
Propinquity
!
Similarity
!
Physical Attractiveness
Propinquity
In other words: Physical Proximity
You become friends with people who are physically close to you
Dorm, Classes, Social Circles...
You stay friends with people you can continue to easily see
High school friends who go to the same college
College friends who move to the same town/city
Friends who are very active on social media sites
Propinquity
Leon Festinger: Westgate West Study
!
!
In a study at MIT in the 1940s, researchers asked a bunch of students who
lived in student housing (at Westgate West) to list their closest friends
!
!
Of the people that each respondent listed as friends, 2/3 of them were
people who lived in the same building!
Propinquity
41% of people living in adjacent rooms listed each other as friends...
Only 10% of those who lived on opposite ends of a hallway did!
Propinquity
Police Academy Study
!
Officers in training were
assigned alphabetically to
dorms and classroom seats
People with “A” names always
close to other “A” names, etc.
!
Officers with similar names were
better friends than those with
different names!
Propinquity
What about diversity?
!
The largest effects of proximity on friendship are actually between
people of different races, ages, and social classes!
!
People tend to be willing to look further for similar friends
!
As a result, “diverse” friendships tend to happen when people of
different races/ages/classes are physically close & easy to run into
Propinquity
Why does propinquity lead to friendship?
1. Makes it more likely that you’ll run into each other
Functional distance is more important than physical distance
People who lived by the stairwell were more likely to be friends with
people on other floors, even though they were technically further away
!
2. People tend to give the benefit of the doubt to people they
expect to interact with often.
Favorable expectations lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy
!
3. Mere Exposure (Zajonc, 1968)
The more you’re exposed to something, the more you like it
Propinquity
Mere Exposure Study (Zajonc, 1968)
!
Showed participants a list of Turkish words
Some words shown 0, 1, 2, 5, 10, or 25 times
The more times a word had been presented, the more the
participants liked it and thought it referred to something good.
This has been replicated with all sorts of things!
Likely due to fluency.
Propinquity
Proximity is the biggest predictor of whether people will become (and
remain) friends or romantic partners
If you never meet, how can you become friends?
If you rarely interact, how can you stay friends?
!
This is a great example of a channel factor!
We want to think we intentionally seek out good friends and partners.
In reality, we choose the best match in the (very) local environment.
Propinquity
!
BUT...the story’s not so simple!
!
Propinquity breeds friends AND enemies
It increases the chance you will have an interaction
If you don’t like someone, propinquity will strengthen it
Test Your Knowledge
You are in Psych 201 with John, and the two of you become good
friends over the semester. Which of the following potential reasons for
your friendship is NOT based on propinquity?
A. After seeing him every Tuesday and Thursday, his face becomes
more and more familiar.
B. You have a shared interest in psychology, so you bond over having
this in common.
C. You know you will see him twice a week, so you want to like him
(and for him to like you) so your interactions will go smoothly.
D. Of all of the seats in the classroom, you tend to sit in the two right
next to each other, so you often end up chatting before class and
during group activities.
Similarity
!
Which do you believe more?
A. Birds of a feather flock together
B. Opposites attract
Similarity
!
Engaged couples tend to be very similar...
!
especially when it comes to
!
demographic variables
(like social class)
physical characteristics
(like attractiveness)
and important personality traits
(like extraversion or openness)
Similarity
!
Married couples tend to be more similar than chance on core
personality characteristics (like extraversion or agreeableness).
!
!
Interracial couples tend to be more similar in personality than same-
race couples, perhaps compensating for dissimilarity on one
dimension by seeking out greater similarity on others
Similarity
The belief that “opposites attract” is not supported by research
If two people have complementary personality traits, they might
work well together (like a dependent person with a nurturer)
However, they still need similarity in other areas to be compatible,
like personality traits, interests/hobbies, or backgrounds.
Similarity: Why?
1. Similar others validate our beliefs
!
When we learn that others believe the same things that we do,
we feel validated
!
We like people who agree with our
beliefs and dislike people who disagree
!
Sort of like selective evaluation
!
!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7t0PHKc_tX0&noredirect=1
Similarity: Why?
2. Similarity Facilitates Smooth Interactions
If 2 people share common beliefs, it’s easier for them to work together
because they can take the basics for granted
!
Davis (1981)
Participants rated a number of attitudes on (a) overall importance and
(b) importance for day-to-day interactions
Participants rated how much they liked other people who agreed vs.
disagreed with them on these attitudes
!
Attitudes that are relevant for day-to-day life are more important for how
much you will like someone than “important” attitudes that don’t play
as much of a role in your daily conversations & interactions.
Similarity: Why?
3. We Expect Similar Others To Like Us
!
Similar others view the world the same way we do
!
We like us! They must also like us! We should like them back!
Similarity: Why?
4. Similar Others Have Qualities We Like
!
We tend to think our values and qualities are the “right ones”
Think about the self-image bias
!
Similar others probably share these same qualities
If they have good qualities, why not like them?
Similarity
Not only does similarity promote interaction, but interaction
promotes similarity!
Zajonc et al. (1987) – “Marriage and Similarity”
Couples who were married 25+ years brought in current photos and
photos from their 1st year of marriage
Cropped the photos; asked unbiased people to rate how similar they
looked at Time 1 and Time 2
After 25 years of marriage, couples looked more alike than they did
as newlyweds!
Why??
!
1. Emotional Mimicry
“If you keep making that face, it’ll get stuck that way”
!
2. Shared Experiences
Interpersonal & Environmental
Test Your Knowledge
Your friend Jason is shy, introverted, and likes spending quiet nights
in reading a good book. You want to set Jason up on a date.
Which friend should you set him up with?
!
A. Alex, your friend who is crazy, extraverted, and loves to party, to
help Jason expand his horizons/break out of his shell and to
provide a good “complement” for his personality.
!
B. Taylor, your friend who is also shy, introverted, and loves reading,
so they will have a lot in common and share similar interests.
Physical Attractiveness



Attractive People Are...
More likely to be asked on dates
!
Rated as more popular, likeable, and successful by peers
!
Assumed to be more skilled, smart, and wealthy
!
Paid $3,500 more per year on average for the same job
!
More likely to receive help if injured
!
Less likely to be convicted of crimes & given lighter sentences if convicted
Physical Attractiveness
Halo Effect
!
The common belief that attractive people
have a host of positive qualities that
extend beyond physical appearance
!
Usually an automatic inference process
Physical Attractiveness
!
The halo effect responds to cultural stereotypes
In individualist cultures, attractive people seen as more assertive
In collectivist cultures, attractive people seen as more empathic
!
!
Interestingly, power & status show the same differences!
In individualist cultures, powerful people are thought to be assertive
In collectivist cultures, powerful people are thought to be generous
Physical Attractiveness
The halo effect might be due to self-fulfilling prophecies
Snyder et al. (1977)
Male and female participants played a “get to know you” game
Spoke over the phone; conversation was recorded
Men given a profile with a picture of the woman they were talking to
Picture was fake. ½ got an “attractive picture,” ½ got “unattractive.”
Later, RAs listened to the recording of the woman ONLY
Women were rated as warmer and more socially skilled if they had talked to
a man who thought they were attractive.
Why?
If men thought she was attractive, they spoke to her in a way that elicited
those positive qualities (were nicer, more interested, etc.)
Physical Attractiveness
Effects start early!
!
Attractive infants get more attention from mothers, even before leaving hospital
!
Children as young as 3 months prefer looking at attractive faces
Children are more comfortable with attractive strangers
Physical Attractiveness: Why?
1. Immediacy
!
As soon as you see someone, you know if they’re hot
!
It takes a while to find out if they’re funny, smart, kind, etc.
!
Primacy Effects – Initial information colors later judgments
Physical Attractiveness: Why?
2. Prestige
!
Attractive people and their partners assumed to be higher in social status
!
Men seen with attractive women rated higher on intelligence & success
Physical Attractiveness: Why?
3. Biology
!
Physical unattractiveness can signal poor health
!
!
Facial symmetry is an indicator of health, also attractiveness
Symmetry = No disease or genetic problems
!
!
Asymmetry usually results from problems in utero (e.g. diseases, malnutrition)
!
Symmetrical adults have fewer infections than asymmetrical peers
Which Is Most Attractive?
!
A B C
!
A B C
Which Is Most Attractive?
Physical Attractiveness
www.symmeter.com
!
Symmetry of physical traits is
hypothesized to reflect an
individual’s overall quality of
development
!
A symmetrical face may be
a good indicator of genetic
fitness
!
http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-
shows/other-shows/videos/
science-of-sex-appeal-the-
beauty-of-symmetry.htm
!
!
A B C
Who Is Most Attractive?
Physical Attractiveness
“Average” faces are rated as more attractive
Composite faces are rated as more attractive than the individual
faces that went into the composite
If you “average” several faces together, common features
remain; unique/unusual (deviant) features get hidden
http://www.faceresearch.org/demos/average
+ =
Caveats
Although there is some consensus about what is attractive, there
is also variability!
Do you have a “type”?
Do all of your friends have this “type” too?
Probably not!
We like those who are physically attractive...BUT we also think that
the people we like are more attractive!
“Eye-of-the-beholder”
Effort Justification
Mere Exposure
Test Your Knowledge
Which of the following physical features does NOT signal health
and reproductive fitness?
!
A. Face “averageness”
B. Bilateral facial symmetry
C. Unique facial features
Test Your Knowledge
Cassie wants Blake – her new boss – to like her. To this end, Cassie
should try all of the following EXCEPT:
!
A. Making herself more physically attractive.
B. Disagreeing with Blake to show that she can think for herself.
C. Working in an office that is physically closer to Blake’s.
D. Voicing similar opinions to Blake’s during casual conversations.
Sex Differences
!
Do men and women differ in what
they find attractive?
!
Short Answer: Yes
!
Long Answer: Ehh, Not So Much
Evolutionary Argument
Parental Investment
The amount of resources that go into having a child
Sperm are cheap; pregnancy is not
!
Because women must invest more in a given child:
They should be choosier
They should select mates based on ability to provide resources (e.g.
wealth, skills, status) to offspring
Because men have a lower investment:
They can be less choosy
They should select mates based on ability to biologically produce
good offspring (e.g. youth, attractiveness)
However...
I cannot stress enough the importance of always thinking about
whether or not there are any confounding variables!!
These differences can also be (better) explained by culture
!
Women in most cultures tend to have less power, fewer resources
In cultures with greater gender equality, women place less importance
on status/resources, more importance on physical attractiveness
Women with the same level of power/status as men are just as likely to
be promiscuous, have affairs, etc.
It’s not about gender/sex as much as it’s about status/resources. It’s just
that in most cultures, women have fewer resources.
Test Your Knowledge
Jenny is filling out an online dating profile. Based on evolutionary
theories of attraction, what should she definitely include to
increase her odds of being asked out?
!
A. Information about how much money she makes.
B. The most flattering picture that she has of herself.
C. Her birthday (if she’s 22 and the average age is 28).
D. Her birthday (if she’s 28 and the average age is 22).
E. Two or more of the above.
Important Points
Characterizing Relationships
Need To Belong
Attachment Styles
Attraction
What causes us to be attracted to other people?
What are the sex differences in attraction?
Romantic Relationships
What is love?
What determines if we’re romantically happy?
How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
Important Points
Characterizing Relationships
Need To Belong
Attachment Styles
Attraction
Propinquity, Similarity, Physical Attractiveness
Women like resources, Men like biology (but confounded by culture)
Romantic Relationships
What is love?
What determines if we’re romantically happy?
How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
Important Points
Characterizing Relationships
Need To Belong
Attachment Styles
Attraction
Propinquity, Similarity, Physical Attractiveness
Women like resources, Men like biology (but confounded by culture)
Romantic Relationships
What is love?
What determines if we’re romantically happy?
How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
Triangular Theory of Love
Three Components:
Intimacy: Attachment, closeness, trust, connectedness
Passion: Sexual attraction, desire, chemistry
Commitment: Loyalty, shared plans and achievements
!
These three components can be combined in different ways
!
Different combinations = Different types of love
Triangular Theory of Love
Intimacy Passion Commitment Example
Non-Love Most Personal Relationships
Liking x Best Friendship
Infatuation x Crush, Friend-With-Benefits
Empty Love x Loveless Marriage
Romantic Love x x Pre-Marriage Relationship
Companionate Love x x Long-Term Marriage
Fatuous Love x x Romeo & Juliet
Consummate Love x x x Western Civilization Ideal
Triangular Theory of Love
Time
Level
Passion
Intimacy
Commitment
Romantic
Love
Companionate
Love
Consummate
Love
Test Your Knowledge
Madison and James are college seniors, and they’ve been
together for the past three years. However, they’re still trying to
figure out what they’re going to do after college; Madison has
applied to med schools all over the country, while James is
planning to stay in Illinois.
How would you describe their relationship?
A. Romantic Love (Intimacy + Passion)
B. Companionate Love (Intimacy + Commitment)
C. Fatuous Love (Passion + Commitment)
D. Consummate Love (Intimacy + Passion + Commitment)
Relationship Satisfaction
Investment Model (Rusbult)
Three factors influence partners’ commitment
1. Rewards-to-costs ratio
2. Quality of alternatives
3. Investments
Relationship Satisfaction
You will be happy if...
You get out as much as (or slightly more than) you put in
You do not have high-quality alternatives
You’ve been together a while; you’ve invested a lot
Relationship Satisfaction
These three factors influence commitment
Commitment determines prosocial behaviors
Sacrificing for the partner, being forgiving, etc.
Prosocial behaviors lead to trust, satisfaction, and well-being
Relationship Satisfaction
1. Rewards-To-Cost Ratio
!
Happy relationships have a reward-to-cost ratio of 5:1 or higher
!
This means that you must have at least 5 positive experiences for
every 1 negative experience
Relationship Satisfaction
Relationship Satisfaction
2. Quality of Alternatives
Fewer Quality Alternatives = Stronger Commitment
Relationship Satisfaction
3. Investments
Putting more into the relationship leads to stronger commitment
Sunk Costs
Effort Justification
Relationship Satisfaction
Test Your Knowledge
Bruce suspects that Kris wants to break up with him, so he decides to use
Rusbult’s investment model to his advantage in order to manipulate her
into staying with him (bad, Bruce!)
!
If Bruce tells Kris that she will never find another partner as good as him
and that no one else will want to date her, he is focusing on the _____
component of Rusbult’s model.
!
A. Investment C. Rewards
B. Alternatives D. Passion
Test Your Knowledge
Bruce suspects that Kris wants to break up with him, so he decides to use
Rusbult’s investment model to his advantage in order to manipulate her
into staying with him (bad, Bruce!)
!
If Bruce reminds Kris about their children together, the house that they
both own, and how difficult it would be to split up all of their property, he
is focusing on the _______ component.
!
A. Investment C. Rewards
B. Alternatives D. Passion
Four Horsemen 

of the Apocalypse
Four behaviors that can be used to predict divorce...
...with 93% ACCURACY!
1. Contempt
Expressing disdain or scorn
2. Criticism
Expressing negative evaluations, being overly critical
3. Defensiveness
Trying to “play the victim” and not accepting responsibility for your part
4. Stonewalling
Withdrawing from the conflict; ignoring and/or avoiding the issue
Four Horsemen
Gottman & Levenson (2000)
Presence of negative affect predicts early divorce
Absence of positive affect predicts later divorce
!
What does this mean?
!
If a lot of the time that you spend with your partner is filled with anger,
anxiety, or conflict, you’re more likely to get divorced early on
!
If you don’t have a lot of negative stuff but you also don’t have a lot of
positive moments, you may make it for a while, but it won’t last forever.
Oh, Kim and Kris...

You should have seen it coming!
Contempt
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g261zQJnXEU
!
Criticism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpo5e7jHGqI
!
Stonewalling
http://youtu.be/rFBH2y4Sbvk?t=1m49s
!
Defensiveness
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grBumqkW9JA
Four Horsemen
Four Horsemen
Note: If you do any of these behaviors, do not despair!
This is not a “death sentence” for your romantic future
!
This just lets you know what you can pay attention to if you want
to ensure happier, stronger romantic bonds
!
This is optimistic! No one is doomed; there are constructive ways
that we can all improve. And now you know how!! ☺
Test Your Knowledge
Which of the following is NOT one of the four behaviors that are
really bad for relationships?
!
A. Stonewalling
B. Fighting
C. Contempt
D. Defensiveness
E. Criticism
Creating Strong Romantic Bonds
1. Capitalize On The Good
Communicating positive events with a partner increases well-being
above and beyond experiencing the event itself
!
Partners can respond in four ways:
Active Constructive: Reacts with enthusiasm, asks follow-up questions
Passive Constructive: Reacts positively, quickly moves on
Active Destructive: Finds something to criticize
Passive Destructive: Isn’t interested, doesn’t comment, moves on
!
Which of the above do you think is the best for relationships?
Creating Strong Romantic Bonds
1. Capitalize On The Good
Communicating positive events with a partner increases well-being
above and beyond experiencing the event itself
!
Partners can respond in four ways:
Active Constructive: Reacts with enthusiasm, asks follow-up questions
Passive Constructive: Reacts positively, quickly moves on
Active Destructive: Finds something to criticize
Passive Destructive: Isn’t interested, doesn’t comment, moves on
!
Which of the above do you think is the worst for relationships?
Creating Strong Romantic Bonds
1. Capitalize On The Good
Communicating positive events with a partner increases well-being
above and beyond experiencing the event itself
!
Partners can respond in four ways:
Active Constructive: Reacts with enthusiasm, asks follow-up questions
Passive Constructive: Reacts positively, quickly moves on
Active Destructive: Finds something to criticize
Passive Destructive: Isn’t interested, doesn’t comment, moves on
!
Best Outcomes: Active Constructive
Worst Outcomes: Active Destructive
Creating Strong Romantic Bonds
1. Capitalize On The Good
Communicating positive events with a partner increases well-being above
and beyond experiencing the event itself
!
Partners can respond in four ways:
Active Constructive: Reacts with enthusiasm, asks follow-up questions
Passive Constructive: Reacts positively, quickly moves on
Active Destructive: Finds something to criticize
Passive Destructive: Isn’t interested, doesn’t comment, moves on
!
Grey’s Anatomy Clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=u9eHVqXOkPY&feature=youtu.be&t=2m10s
Is Derek’s response (A) Constructive or (B) Destructive?
Creating Strong Romantic Bonds
2. Be Playful
The early part of a relationship is very lively!
!
Avoid getting into a rut
Actively seek out new activities to do together
Vacations, sports, clubs, trying new restaurants...
These activities keep the passion level high!
!
Use humor, often
Happy couples have fun nicknames, joke around, etc.
Creating Strong Romantic Bonds
☺
Creating Strong Romantic Bonds
3. Care And Forgive
Causal attributions matter!
!
Unhappy Couples
Internal, Stable, Global for negative events
External, Unstable, Specific for positive events
Happy Couples
External, Unstable, Specific for negative events
Internal, Stable, Global for positive events
!
Cultivate a compassionate and generous view of your partner.
Creating Strong Romantic Bonds
4. Idealize Your Partner
What is idealization?
Overestimating positive traits (compared to how your partner sees self)
Underestimating negative traits
Remember how people use self-serving biases to see themselves in a better
light? Apply these to your partner, too!
Idealization increases satisfaction for the person who is idealized and the
person doing the idealizing!
!
James Carville & Mary Matalin Video ☺
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=5l7z0UMi6-4&feature=related&noredirect=1
Important Points
Characterizing Relationships
Need To Belong
Attachment Styles
Attraction
Propinquity, Similarity, Physical Attractiveness
Women like resources, Men like biology (but confounded by culture)
Romantic Relationships
What is love?
What determines if we’re romantically happy?
How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
Important Points
Characterizing Relationships
Need To Belong
Attachment Styles
Attraction
Propinquity, Similarity, Physical Attractiveness
Women like resources, Men like biology (but confounded by culture)
Romantic Relationships
Triangular Theory
Investment Model; Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
Capitalize on the good, be playful, care/forgive, and idealize!
Important Points
Characterizing Relationships
Need To Belong
Attachment Styles
Attraction
Propinquity, Similarity, Physical Attractiveness
Women like resources, Men like biology (but confounded by culture)
Romantic Relationships
Triangular Theory
Investment Model; Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
Capitalize on the good, be playful, care/forgive, and idealize!
Top Ten Things To Know
Attachment Styles
If given a description, be able to
identify what “style” it is!
!
Triangular Theory of Love
!
!
Rusbult’s Investment Model
!
What do we find attractive?
Composite/Average Faces
Symmetry
Evolutionary Theories
Gottman’s Research
Ideal Positive-to-Negative Ratio
Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
!
What does it mean that the “need to
belong” is universal?
!
Mere Exposure & Propinquity
!
We Like Similar Others
!
Self-Fulfilling Prophecies & Attractiveness

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

American Family-Chapter 7: Self concept
American Family-Chapter 7: Self conceptAmerican Family-Chapter 7: Self concept
American Family-Chapter 7: Self conceptbartlettfcs
 
building a positive self concept
building a positive self conceptbuilding a positive self concept
building a positive self conceptCristy Melloso
 
Transactional Analysis PPT - OB - Shimna
Transactional Analysis PPT - OB - ShimnaTransactional Analysis PPT - OB - Shimna
Transactional Analysis PPT - OB - ShimnaChinnu Shimna
 
Psychology unit VI- Developmental Psycholgy
Psychology unit  VI- Developmental PsycholgyPsychology unit  VI- Developmental Psycholgy
Psychology unit VI- Developmental PsycholgyAkila anbalagan
 
IGNOU Super-Notes: MPC2 LifeSpan Development_3 Development During Adolescence...
IGNOU Super-Notes: MPC2 LifeSpan Development_3 Development During Adolescence...IGNOU Super-Notes: MPC2 LifeSpan Development_3 Development During Adolescence...
IGNOU Super-Notes: MPC2 LifeSpan Development_3 Development During Adolescence...PsychoTech Services
 
Promoting self esteem- Ms Ritika soni
Promoting self esteem- Ms Ritika soniPromoting self esteem- Ms Ritika soni
Promoting self esteem- Ms Ritika soniShimla
 
Human development .Nohoochem
Human development .Nohoochem  Human development .Nohoochem
Human development .Nohoochem NOHOCHEM
 
"Bully Proof" powerpoint from the author of "The Hero in Me"
"Bully Proof" powerpoint from the author of "The Hero in Me""Bully Proof" powerpoint from the author of "The Hero in Me"
"Bully Proof" powerpoint from the author of "The Hero in Me"annieglass
 
Understanding & Responding to Bullying Part II
Understanding & Responding to Bullying Part IIUnderstanding & Responding to Bullying Part II
Understanding & Responding to Bullying Part IIdengranai
 
Erik Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial Development
Erik Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial DevelopmentErik Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial Development
Erik Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial DevelopmentWendell Godinho
 
Meaning, concept and development of self concept, self esteem,self confidence...
Meaning, concept and development of self concept, self esteem,self confidence...Meaning, concept and development of self concept, self esteem,self confidence...
Meaning, concept and development of self concept, self esteem,self confidence...Suresh Babu
 
What TA is? - Transactional Analysis
What TA is? - Transactional AnalysisWhat TA is? - Transactional Analysis
What TA is? - Transactional AnalysisManu Melwin Joy
 
Building self esteem
Building self esteemBuilding self esteem
Building self esteemImprint Pdp
 
Psychological needs
Psychological needsPsychological needs
Psychological needsJames Neill
 

Mais procurados (20)

American Family-Chapter 7: Self concept
American Family-Chapter 7: Self conceptAmerican Family-Chapter 7: Self concept
American Family-Chapter 7: Self concept
 
building a positive self concept
building a positive self conceptbuilding a positive self concept
building a positive self concept
 
Transactional Analysis PPT - OB - Shimna
Transactional Analysis PPT - OB - ShimnaTransactional Analysis PPT - OB - Shimna
Transactional Analysis PPT - OB - Shimna
 
Attitude
AttitudeAttitude
Attitude
 
Psychology unit VI- Developmental Psycholgy
Psychology unit  VI- Developmental PsycholgyPsychology unit  VI- Developmental Psycholgy
Psychology unit VI- Developmental Psycholgy
 
Psychological needs of a learner
Psychological needs of a learnerPsychological needs of a learner
Psychological needs of a learner
 
IGNOU Super-Notes: MPC2 LifeSpan Development_3 Development During Adolescence...
IGNOU Super-Notes: MPC2 LifeSpan Development_3 Development During Adolescence...IGNOU Super-Notes: MPC2 LifeSpan Development_3 Development During Adolescence...
IGNOU Super-Notes: MPC2 LifeSpan Development_3 Development During Adolescence...
 
Chapter 1 lecture
Chapter 1 lectureChapter 1 lecture
Chapter 1 lecture
 
Promoting self esteem- Ms Ritika soni
Promoting self esteem- Ms Ritika soniPromoting self esteem- Ms Ritika soni
Promoting self esteem- Ms Ritika soni
 
Transactional analysis
Transactional analysisTransactional analysis
Transactional analysis
 
Human development .Nohoochem
Human development .Nohoochem  Human development .Nohoochem
Human development .Nohoochem
 
"Bully Proof" powerpoint from the author of "The Hero in Me"
"Bully Proof" powerpoint from the author of "The Hero in Me""Bully Proof" powerpoint from the author of "The Hero in Me"
"Bully Proof" powerpoint from the author of "The Hero in Me"
 
Understanding & Responding to Bullying Part II
Understanding & Responding to Bullying Part IIUnderstanding & Responding to Bullying Part II
Understanding & Responding to Bullying Part II
 
Erik Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial Development
Erik Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial DevelopmentErik Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial Development
Erik Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial Development
 
Meaning, concept and development of self concept, self esteem,self confidence...
Meaning, concept and development of self concept, self esteem,self confidence...Meaning, concept and development of self concept, self esteem,self confidence...
Meaning, concept and development of self concept, self esteem,self confidence...
 
yeah
yeahyeah
yeah
 
What TA is? - Transactional Analysis
What TA is? - Transactional AnalysisWhat TA is? - Transactional Analysis
What TA is? - Transactional Analysis
 
Self concept and self esteem
Self concept and self esteemSelf concept and self esteem
Self concept and self esteem
 
Building self esteem
Building self esteemBuilding self esteem
Building self esteem
 
Psychological needs
Psychological needsPsychological needs
Psychological needs
 

Semelhante a RELATIONSHIPS & ATTRACTION (Psych 201 - Chapter 10 - Spring 2014)

Attachement Styles in Adulthood 2.0.pptx
Attachement Styles in Adulthood 2.0.pptxAttachement Styles in Adulthood 2.0.pptx
Attachement Styles in Adulthood 2.0.pptxCol Mukteshwar Prasad
 
Attachment Theory and Settling
Attachment Theory and Settling Attachment Theory and Settling
Attachment Theory and Settling Sammy Fugler
 
types of attachment styles
types of attachment stylestypes of attachment styles
types of attachment stylesEzatie Zamri
 
Assignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docx
Assignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docxAssignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docx
Assignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docxannrodgerson
 
Assignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docx
Assignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docxAssignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docx
Assignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docxhuttenangela
 
5_6140757911254599439.pptx
5_6140757911254599439.pptx5_6140757911254599439.pptx
5_6140757911254599439.pptxRCGaur1
 
Notes On Choose Respect Materials
Notes On Choose Respect MaterialsNotes On Choose Respect Materials
Notes On Choose Respect MaterialsCamille LoParrino
 
Lesson 5 Step Parenting Strengths NOTES
Lesson 5 Step Parenting Strengths NOTESLesson 5 Step Parenting Strengths NOTES
Lesson 5 Step Parenting Strengths NOTESBarry Neufeld
 
The Development of Social Relations - Fundamentals of Psychology 2 - Lecture 3
The Development of Social Relations - Fundamentals of Psychology 2 - Lecture 3The Development of Social Relations - Fundamentals of Psychology 2 - Lecture 3
The Development of Social Relations - Fundamentals of Psychology 2 - Lecture 3Simon Bignell
 
People Who Cause You Harm: How to Explain Dramatic and Erratic Personality Di...
People Who Cause You Harm: How to Explain Dramatic and Erratic Personality Di...People Who Cause You Harm: How to Explain Dramatic and Erratic Personality Di...
People Who Cause You Harm: How to Explain Dramatic and Erratic Personality Di...Jeni Mawter
 
Adult Attachment Disorder presentation
Adult Attachment Disorder presentationAdult Attachment Disorder presentation
Adult Attachment Disorder presentationJournamed
 
Adult Children Of Alcoholics - May 2009
Adult Children Of Alcoholics - May 2009Adult Children Of Alcoholics - May 2009
Adult Children Of Alcoholics - May 2009Dawn Farm
 
Psychological Research Into Individual Differences In...
Psychological Research Into Individual Differences In...Psychological Research Into Individual Differences In...
Psychological Research Into Individual Differences In...Robin Anderson
 
Healthy Relationships
Healthy RelationshipsHealthy Relationships
Healthy Relationshipsjpelgrin
 
Speech151spring3004chapter4
Speech151spring3004chapter4Speech151spring3004chapter4
Speech151spring3004chapter4RThornock
 
Reasons to commit sucides by students
Reasons to commit sucides by studentsReasons to commit sucides by students
Reasons to commit sucides by studentsrajukammari
 

Semelhante a RELATIONSHIPS & ATTRACTION (Psych 201 - Chapter 10 - Spring 2014) (20)

Attachement Styles in Adulthood 2.0.pptx
Attachement Styles in Adulthood 2.0.pptxAttachement Styles in Adulthood 2.0.pptx
Attachement Styles in Adulthood 2.0.pptx
 
Attachment Theory and Settling
Attachment Theory and Settling Attachment Theory and Settling
Attachment Theory and Settling
 
types of attachment styles
types of attachment stylestypes of attachment styles
types of attachment styles
 
Assignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docx
Assignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docxAssignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docx
Assignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docx
 
attachment_disorders.pdf
attachment_disorders.pdfattachment_disorders.pdf
attachment_disorders.pdf
 
Assignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docx
Assignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docxAssignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docx
Assignment 2 Romantic Attachment StylesThere are three primary .docx
 
5_6140757911254599439.pptx
5_6140757911254599439.pptx5_6140757911254599439.pptx
5_6140757911254599439.pptx
 
Notes On Choose Respect Materials
Notes On Choose Respect MaterialsNotes On Choose Respect Materials
Notes On Choose Respect Materials
 
Lesson 5 Step Parenting Strengths NOTES
Lesson 5 Step Parenting Strengths NOTESLesson 5 Step Parenting Strengths NOTES
Lesson 5 Step Parenting Strengths NOTES
 
Attachment Theory.pptx
Attachment Theory.pptxAttachment Theory.pptx
Attachment Theory.pptx
 
The Development of Social Relations - Fundamentals of Psychology 2 - Lecture 3
The Development of Social Relations - Fundamentals of Psychology 2 - Lecture 3The Development of Social Relations - Fundamentals of Psychology 2 - Lecture 3
The Development of Social Relations - Fundamentals of Psychology 2 - Lecture 3
 
People Who Cause You Harm: How to Explain Dramatic and Erratic Personality Di...
People Who Cause You Harm: How to Explain Dramatic and Erratic Personality Di...People Who Cause You Harm: How to Explain Dramatic and Erratic Personality Di...
People Who Cause You Harm: How to Explain Dramatic and Erratic Personality Di...
 
Adult Attachment Disorder presentation
Adult Attachment Disorder presentationAdult Attachment Disorder presentation
Adult Attachment Disorder presentation
 
Adult Children Of Alcoholics - May 2009
Adult Children Of Alcoholics - May 2009Adult Children Of Alcoholics - May 2009
Adult Children Of Alcoholics - May 2009
 
Psychological Research Into Individual Differences In...
Psychological Research Into Individual Differences In...Psychological Research Into Individual Differences In...
Psychological Research Into Individual Differences In...
 
Human development
Human developmentHuman development
Human development
 
Self Respect Essays
Self Respect EssaysSelf Respect Essays
Self Respect Essays
 
Healthy Relationships
Healthy RelationshipsHealthy Relationships
Healthy Relationships
 
Speech151spring3004chapter4
Speech151spring3004chapter4Speech151spring3004chapter4
Speech151spring3004chapter4
 
Reasons to commit sucides by students
Reasons to commit sucides by studentsReasons to commit sucides by students
Reasons to commit sucides by students
 

Mais de Melanie Tannenbaum

SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Teachers
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - TeachersSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Teachers
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - TeachersMelanie Tannenbaum
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intergroup Relations & Cooperative ...
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intergroup Relations & Cooperative ...SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intergroup Relations & Cooperative ...
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intergroup Relations & Cooperative ...Melanie Tannenbaum
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Diversity, Stigma, and Affirmative ...
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Diversity, Stigma, and Affirmative ...SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Diversity, Stigma, and Affirmative ...
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Diversity, Stigma, and Affirmative ...Melanie Tannenbaum
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Race/Ethnicity & Education
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Race/Ethnicity & EducationSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Race/Ethnicity & Education
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Race/Ethnicity & EducationMelanie Tannenbaum
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Culture & Education
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Culture & EducationSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Culture & Education
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Culture & EducationMelanie Tannenbaum
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Gender & Education
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Gender & EducationSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Gender & Education
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Gender & EducationMelanie Tannenbaum
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Goals & Motivation
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Goals & MotivationSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Goals & Motivation
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Goals & MotivationMelanie Tannenbaum
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Waiting For Superman
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Waiting For SupermanSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Waiting For Superman
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Waiting For SupermanMelanie Tannenbaum
 
Writing Workshop - SOC 463/663, Spring 2015
Writing Workshop - SOC 463/663, Spring 2015Writing Workshop - SOC 463/663, Spring 2015
Writing Workshop - SOC 463/663, Spring 2015Melanie Tannenbaum
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Attributions & Beliefs
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Attributions & BeliefsSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Attributions & Beliefs
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Attributions & BeliefsMelanie Tannenbaum
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Stratification
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - StratificationSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Stratification
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - StratificationMelanie Tannenbaum
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Grades & Cultural Capital
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Grades & Cultural CapitalSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Grades & Cultural Capital
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Grades & Cultural CapitalMelanie Tannenbaum
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Socialization
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - SocializationSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Socialization
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - SocializationMelanie Tannenbaum
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Tracking & Ability Grouping
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Tracking & Ability GroupingSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Tracking & Ability Grouping
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Tracking & Ability GroupingMelanie Tannenbaum
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Spring 2015 Syllabus
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Spring 2015 SyllabusSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Spring 2015 Syllabus
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Spring 2015 SyllabusMelanie Tannenbaum
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intro & Theories
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intro & TheoriesSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intro & Theories
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intro & TheoriesMelanie Tannenbaum
 
SOCIAL PSYCH INTRO (Psych 201 - Chapter 1 - Spring 2014)
SOCIAL PSYCH INTRO (Psych 201 - Chapter 1 - Spring 2014)SOCIAL PSYCH INTRO (Psych 201 - Chapter 1 - Spring 2014)
SOCIAL PSYCH INTRO (Psych 201 - Chapter 1 - Spring 2014)Melanie Tannenbaum
 
EXPLAINING BEHAVIOR (Psych 201 - Chapter 5 - Spring 2014)
EXPLAINING BEHAVIOR (Psych 201 - Chapter 5 - Spring 2014)EXPLAINING BEHAVIOR (Psych 201 - Chapter 5 - Spring 2014)
EXPLAINING BEHAVIOR (Psych 201 - Chapter 5 - Spring 2014)Melanie Tannenbaum
 
EMOTION (Psych 201 - Chapter 6 - Spring 2014)
EMOTION (Psych 201 - Chapter 6 - Spring 2014)EMOTION (Psych 201 - Chapter 6 - Spring 2014)
EMOTION (Psych 201 - Chapter 6 - Spring 2014)Melanie Tannenbaum
 

Mais de Melanie Tannenbaum (20)

SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Teachers
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - TeachersSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Teachers
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Teachers
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intergroup Relations & Cooperative ...
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intergroup Relations & Cooperative ...SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intergroup Relations & Cooperative ...
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intergroup Relations & Cooperative ...
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Diversity, Stigma, and Affirmative ...
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Diversity, Stigma, and Affirmative ...SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Diversity, Stigma, and Affirmative ...
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Diversity, Stigma, and Affirmative ...
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Race/Ethnicity & Education
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Race/Ethnicity & EducationSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Race/Ethnicity & Education
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Race/Ethnicity & Education
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Culture & Education
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Culture & EducationSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Culture & Education
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Culture & Education
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Gender & Education
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Gender & EducationSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Gender & Education
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Gender & Education
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Goals & Motivation
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Goals & MotivationSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Goals & Motivation
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Goals & Motivation
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Waiting For Superman
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Waiting For SupermanSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Waiting For Superman
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Waiting For Superman
 
Essay Handout
Essay HandoutEssay Handout
Essay Handout
 
Writing Workshop - SOC 463/663, Spring 2015
Writing Workshop - SOC 463/663, Spring 2015Writing Workshop - SOC 463/663, Spring 2015
Writing Workshop - SOC 463/663, Spring 2015
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Attributions & Beliefs
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Attributions & BeliefsSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Attributions & Beliefs
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Attributions & Beliefs
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Stratification
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - StratificationSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Stratification
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Stratification
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Grades & Cultural Capital
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Grades & Cultural CapitalSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Grades & Cultural Capital
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Grades & Cultural Capital
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Socialization
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - SocializationSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Socialization
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Socialization
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Tracking & Ability Grouping
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Tracking & Ability GroupingSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Tracking & Ability Grouping
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Tracking & Ability Grouping
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Spring 2015 Syllabus
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Spring 2015 SyllabusSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Spring 2015 Syllabus
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Spring 2015 Syllabus
 
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intro & Theories
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intro & TheoriesSOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intro & Theories
SOC 463/663 (Social Psych of Education) - Intro & Theories
 
SOCIAL PSYCH INTRO (Psych 201 - Chapter 1 - Spring 2014)
SOCIAL PSYCH INTRO (Psych 201 - Chapter 1 - Spring 2014)SOCIAL PSYCH INTRO (Psych 201 - Chapter 1 - Spring 2014)
SOCIAL PSYCH INTRO (Psych 201 - Chapter 1 - Spring 2014)
 
EXPLAINING BEHAVIOR (Psych 201 - Chapter 5 - Spring 2014)
EXPLAINING BEHAVIOR (Psych 201 - Chapter 5 - Spring 2014)EXPLAINING BEHAVIOR (Psych 201 - Chapter 5 - Spring 2014)
EXPLAINING BEHAVIOR (Psych 201 - Chapter 5 - Spring 2014)
 
EMOTION (Psych 201 - Chapter 6 - Spring 2014)
EMOTION (Psych 201 - Chapter 6 - Spring 2014)EMOTION (Psych 201 - Chapter 6 - Spring 2014)
EMOTION (Psych 201 - Chapter 6 - Spring 2014)
 

Último

CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THEO CÂU CHO HỌC SINH LỚP 12 ĐỂ ĐẠT ĐIỂM 5+ THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THEO CÂU CHO HỌC SINH LỚP 12 ĐỂ ĐẠT ĐIỂM 5+ THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THEO CÂU CHO HỌC SINH LỚP 12 ĐỂ ĐẠT ĐIỂM 5+ THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THEO CÂU CHO HỌC SINH LỚP 12 ĐỂ ĐẠT ĐIỂM 5+ THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWMythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQuiz Club NITW
 
DBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdf
DBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdfDBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdf
DBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdfChristalin Nelson
 
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdfNarcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdfPrerana Jadhav
 
CLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptx
CLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptxCLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptx
CLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptxAnupam32727
 
4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptx
4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptx4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptx
4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptxmary850239
 
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptxDecoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptxDhatriParmar
 
Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...
Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...
Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...DhatriParmar
 
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...HetalPathak10
 
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptxGrade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptxkarenfajardo43
 
The role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenship
The role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenshipThe role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenship
The role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenshipKarl Donert
 
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptxUnraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptxDhatriParmar
 
Shark introduction Morphology and its behaviour characteristics
Shark introduction Morphology and its behaviour characteristicsShark introduction Morphology and its behaviour characteristics
Shark introduction Morphology and its behaviour characteristicsArubSultan
 
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptxMan or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptxDhatriParmar
 
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdfMS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdfMr Bounab Samir
 
Objectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptx
Objectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptxObjectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptx
Objectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptxMadhavi Dharankar
 

Último (20)

CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THEO CÂU CHO HỌC SINH LỚP 12 ĐỂ ĐẠT ĐIỂM 5+ THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THEO CÂU CHO HỌC SINH LỚP 12 ĐỂ ĐẠT ĐIỂM 5+ THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THEO CÂU CHO HỌC SINH LỚP 12 ĐỂ ĐẠT ĐIỂM 5+ THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN THEO CÂU CHO HỌC SINH LỚP 12 ĐỂ ĐẠT ĐIỂM 5+ THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...
 
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWMythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
 
DBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdf
DBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdfDBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdf
DBMSArchitecture_QueryProcessingandOptimization.pdf
 
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdfNarcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
 
CLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptx
CLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptxCLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptx
CLASSIFICATION OF ANTI - CANCER DRUGS.pptx
 
4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptx
4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptx4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptx
4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptx
 
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptxDecoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
 
Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...
Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...
Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...
 
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
 
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptxGrade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
Grade Three -ELLNA-REVIEWER-ENGLISH.pptx
 
The role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenship
The role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenshipThe role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenship
The role of Geography in climate education: science and active citizenship
 
Faculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of Engineering
Faculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of EngineeringFaculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of Engineering
Faculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of Engineering
 
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptxUnraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptx
 
Shark introduction Morphology and its behaviour characteristics
Shark introduction Morphology and its behaviour characteristicsShark introduction Morphology and its behaviour characteristics
Shark introduction Morphology and its behaviour characteristics
 
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptxMan or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
 
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdfMS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
 
Chi-Square Test Non Parametric Test Categorical Variable
Chi-Square Test Non Parametric Test Categorical VariableChi-Square Test Non Parametric Test Categorical Variable
Chi-Square Test Non Parametric Test Categorical Variable
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design" - Introduction to Machine Learning"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design" - Introduction to Machine Learning"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design" - Introduction to Machine Learning"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design" - Introduction to Machine Learning"
 
Introduction to Research ,Need for research, Need for design of Experiments, ...
Introduction to Research ,Need for research, Need for design of Experiments, ...Introduction to Research ,Need for research, Need for design of Experiments, ...
Introduction to Research ,Need for research, Need for design of Experiments, ...
 
Objectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptx
Objectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptxObjectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptx
Objectives n learning outcoms - MD 20240404.pptx
 

RELATIONSHIPS & ATTRACTION (Psych 201 - Chapter 10 - Spring 2014)

  • 1. This Week’s Playlist Artist Song / Psych Concept 1. Justin Bieber ft. Ludacris All Around The World (Universal Need To Belong) 2. Phillip Phillips Home (Secure Attachment/Secure Base) 3. Nelly Furtado I’m Like A Bird (Avoidant Attachment) 4. P!nk Please Don’t Leave Me (Anxious Attachment) 5. Calvin Harris Feel So Close (Propinquity) 6. Good Charlotte Girls & Boys (Gender Differences In Mate Preferences) 7. Bruno Mars Just The Way You Are (Idealization)
  • 2. Chapter 10
 
 
 
 Attraction & Relationships Melanie B. Tannenbaum, M.A. Psychology 201 Spring 2014
  • 3. Important Points Characterizing Relationships Why are relationships important? How do people form relationships with each other? Attraction What causes us to be attracted to other people? What are the sex differences in attraction? Romantic Relationships What is love? What determines if we’re romantically happy? How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
  • 4. Important Points Characterizing Relationships Why are relationships important? How do people form relationships with each other? Attraction What causes us to be attracted to other people? What are the sex differences in attraction? Romantic Relationships What is love? What determines if we’re romantically happy? How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
  • 5. Harlow’s Monkeys Infant rhesus monkeys put in a cage with two different “mothers” The “cloth mother” looked like a monkey, but couldn’t give milk The “wire mother” didn’t look like a monkey, but it could give milk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_O60TYAIgC4
  • 6. Harlow’s Monkeys The monkeys clung to the cloth mother and went to it for comfort when they felt threatened. They only approached the wire mother when hungry, and sometimes starved before leaving the cloth mother. Infant monkeys preferred warmth and comfort over food!
  • 7. Need to Belong This hints at an important core need...the need to belong. Relationships help people survive Parent-child attachments help keep babies safe Friendships help non-family members cooperate and thrive We need other people to help us survive!
  • 8. Need to Belong The need to belong is universal. What does that mean? ! Cultures around the world show certain behaviors, like... Caregiving between mother and child Wrestling between siblings Flirtation among young people who are looking for love Affection between romantic partners Dominance displays between adolescent males ! Supports the idea of an evolutionary basis for the need to belong.
  • 9. Relationships Are Important! Mortality rates higher among divorced, unmarried, & widowed ! Suicide/crime rates are higher for single and divorced people ! Social support strengthens cardiovascular, immune, and endocrine systems ! Harlow’s monkeys who were raised in isolation were highly fearful, unable to interact with peers, and inappropriately sexual as adolescents ! Relationships also shape our sense of who we are! Remember the relational self from Chapter 3
  • 10. Attachment Theory Which description best fits your relationships? A. I find it relatively easy to get close to others and am comfortable depending on them and having them depend on me. I don’t often worry about being abandoned or about someone getting too close to me. C. I am somewhat uncomfortable being close to others. I find it difficult to trust them completely, difficult to allow myself to depend on them. I am nervous when anyone gets too close, and romantic partners often want me to be more intimate than I’m comfortable with. B. I find that others are reluctant to get as close as I would like. I often worry that my partner doesn’t really love me or won’t want to stay with me. I want to merge with my partner, and this desire sometimes scares people away.
  • 11. Attachment Theory John Bowlby ! Human infants are born with few survival skills; children rely on parents for security, which allows them to explore the environment and learn ! Attachment Theory: Theory about how our early attachments with our parents shape our relationships for the rest of our lives ! Infants must develop a relationship with at least one caregiver for social/ emotional development to occur normally; this provides a schema that is automatically applied to later relationships
  • 12. Developmental Trajectory 1. Proximity Seeking (2 – 6 months) 2. Safe Haven (8 – 10 months) 3. Secure Base (1 year)
  • 13. Developmental Trajectory 1. Proximity Seeking (2 – 6 months) 2. Safe Haven (8 – 10 months) 3. Secure Base (1 year) The developmental order is similar in adult relationships!
  • 14. Developmental Trajectory 1. Proximity Seeking (2 – 6 months) 2. Safe Haven (8 – 10 months) 3. Secure Base (1 year) The developmental order is similar in adult relationships!
  • 15. Working Models Working Model: Schema for how others tend to treat you in relationships ! ! Expectations about partner’s availability, warmth, and security. ! ! Over time, these become solidified and exert an automatic influence on behavior (you expect people to react in fairly stable, predictable ways).
  • 16. Attachment Theory: Infants Mary Ainsworth Strange Situation Paradigm Simple test to assess infant attachment to caregiver http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTsewNrHUHU ! Infant and Caregiver enter an unfamiliar room with toys Stranger walks in, Caregiver leaves Caregiver returns after 3 minutes How did the infant respond after the caregiver returned?
  • 17. Three Attachment Styles ! 1. Secure Attachment (62%) ! 2. Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment (15%) ! 3. Avoidant Attachment (23%)
  • 18. Secure Attachment Generally trusting ! Infant: Actively explores the room when Mom is around, upset when Mom leaves, and happy when Mom returns. ! Caregiver: Responds quickly and reliably to cries, responsive to child’s individual needs.
  • 19. Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment Generally fearful, angry, distraught ! Infant: Clings to Mom when she is around, upset when Mom leaves, angry or still upset when Mom returns. ! Caregiver: Tends to be unpredictable; sometimes intrudes on the child’s activities, sometimes rejects or ignores the child. Guided by whatever she wants to do.
  • 20. Avoidant Attachment Generally aloof, dismissive. ! Infant: Ignores Mom when she is around, doesn’t care when she leaves, continues to ignore her when she returns. ! Caregiver: Ignores child, doesn’t pay attention to infant’s wants or needs.
  • 21. Adult Attachment Infant styles provide working models for our relationships as adults. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Secure Attachment Comfortable with intimacy Want to be close to others during threat/uncertainty
  • 22. Adult Attachment Infant styles provide working models for our relationships as adults. ! Secure Attachment Comfortable with intimacy Want to be close to others during threat/uncertainty Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment Constantly expresses worries/concerns about relationships Excessively seeks closeness during threat/uncertainty ! Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment Constantly expresses worries/concerns about relationships Excessively seeks closeness during threat/uncertainty
  • 23. Adult Attachment Infant styles provide working models for our relationships as adults. ! Secure Attachment Comfortable with intimacy Want to be close to others during threat/uncertainty Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment Constantly expresses worries/concerns about relationships Excessively seeks closeness during threat/uncertainty ! Avoidant Attachment Prefers distance; shows compulsive self-reliance Uncomfortable with intimacy Dismissive and detached during threat/uncertainty
  • 24. Adult Attachment Infant styles provide working models for our relationships as adults. ! Secure Attachment Comfortable with intimacy Want to be close to others during threat/uncertainty Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment Constantly expresses worries/concerns about relationships Excessively seeks closeness during threat/uncertainty Avoidant Attachment Prefers distance; shows compulsive self-reliance Uncomfortable with intimacy Dismissive and detached during threat/uncertainty
  • 25. Test Your Knowledge What’s This Attachment Style? I am comfortable without close emotional relationships. It is very important to me to feel independent and self-sufficient. I prefer not to depend on others or have others depend on me. Romantic partners often want me to be more intimate than I am comfortable with. ! A) Secure Attachment B) Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment C) Avoidant Attachment
  • 26. Test Your Knowledge What’s This Attachment Style? I find it relatively easy to get close to others and am comfortable depending on them and having them depend on me. I don’t often worry about being abandoned or about someone getting too close to me. ! A) Secure Attachment B) Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment C) Avoidant Attachment
  • 27. Test Your Knowledge What’s This Attachment Style? I find that others are reluctant to get as close as I would like. I often worry that my partner doesn’t really love me or won’t want to stay with me. I want to merge with my partner, and this sometimes scares people away. ! A) Secure Attachment B) Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment C) Avoidant Attachment
  • 28. Attachment Styles Find out what your attachment style is: http://www.web-research-design.net/cgi-bin/crq/crq.pl ! Adult attachment style is relatively stable ! Important schema are typically very difficult to change Require a lot of counter-evidence Must update automatic and deliberate aspects of schema Must overcome self-fulfilling prophecies
  • 29. Attachment Styles However...this doesn’t mean that all relationships are the same. ! Baldwin et al. (1996) Participants listed 10 important relationships Indicated their attachment style in each one Over 50% of participants had experienced all 3 major attachment styles at some point or another ! Everyone can be secure/anxious/avoidant, especially if you end up dating someone who “brings out” the best (or worst) in you
  • 30. Securely Attached People... Are more likely to be married Have fewer marital problems ! Over four years... Only 26% of secure participants broke up with their partners 44% of anxious participants went through a break-up 52% of avoidant participants went through a break-up ! Generally, secure is good. Try to aim for secure relationships!
  • 31. One Important Caveat!! During this section, we’ve spoken a lot about the importance of having loving, attentive caregivers. This is not meant to say ANYTHING at all about the relative merits of being a stay-at-home or working mother. Huge, important, famous NICHD study on early childcare: Absolutely no difference in all important outcomes between kids raised by stay-at-home or working mothers. The only important thing is that when parents are home, they have high-quality, caring interactions with their children. The infants in these examples that are “deprived of maternal affection” are typically orphans who receive no love/care.
  • 32. Important Points Characterizing Relationships Why are relationships important? How do people form relationships with each other? Attraction What causes us to be attracted to other people? What are the sex differences in attraction? Romantic Relationships What is love? What determines if we’re romantically happy? How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
  • 33. Important Points Characterizing Relationships Need To Belong Attachment Styles Attraction What causes us to be attracted to other people? What are the sex differences in attraction? Romantic Relationships What is love? What determines if we’re romantically happy? How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
  • 34. Important Points Characterizing Relationships Need To Belong Attachment Styles Attraction What causes us to be attracted to other people? What are the sex differences in attraction? Romantic Relationships What is love? What determines if we’re romantically happy? How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
  • 35. Where did you meet your 
 best friend at UIUC? A) In a dorm or shared living space (Greek house, etc.) B) In a class C) Through friends or friends-of-friends D) Through a club/team that you attend frequently E) None of the above
  • 37. Propinquity In other words: Physical Proximity You become friends with people who are physically close to you Dorm, Classes, Social Circles... You stay friends with people you can continue to easily see High school friends who go to the same college College friends who move to the same town/city Friends who are very active on social media sites
  • 38. Propinquity Leon Festinger: Westgate West Study ! ! In a study at MIT in the 1940s, researchers asked a bunch of students who lived in student housing (at Westgate West) to list their closest friends ! ! Of the people that each respondent listed as friends, 2/3 of them were people who lived in the same building!
  • 39. Propinquity 41% of people living in adjacent rooms listed each other as friends... Only 10% of those who lived on opposite ends of a hallway did!
  • 40. Propinquity Police Academy Study ! Officers in training were assigned alphabetically to dorms and classroom seats People with “A” names always close to other “A” names, etc. ! Officers with similar names were better friends than those with different names!
  • 41. Propinquity What about diversity? ! The largest effects of proximity on friendship are actually between people of different races, ages, and social classes! ! People tend to be willing to look further for similar friends ! As a result, “diverse” friendships tend to happen when people of different races/ages/classes are physically close & easy to run into
  • 42. Propinquity Why does propinquity lead to friendship? 1. Makes it more likely that you’ll run into each other Functional distance is more important than physical distance People who lived by the stairwell were more likely to be friends with people on other floors, even though they were technically further away ! 2. People tend to give the benefit of the doubt to people they expect to interact with often. Favorable expectations lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy ! 3. Mere Exposure (Zajonc, 1968) The more you’re exposed to something, the more you like it
  • 43. Propinquity Mere Exposure Study (Zajonc, 1968) ! Showed participants a list of Turkish words Some words shown 0, 1, 2, 5, 10, or 25 times The more times a word had been presented, the more the participants liked it and thought it referred to something good. This has been replicated with all sorts of things! Likely due to fluency.
  • 44. Propinquity Proximity is the biggest predictor of whether people will become (and remain) friends or romantic partners If you never meet, how can you become friends? If you rarely interact, how can you stay friends? ! This is a great example of a channel factor! We want to think we intentionally seek out good friends and partners. In reality, we choose the best match in the (very) local environment.
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47. Propinquity ! BUT...the story’s not so simple! ! Propinquity breeds friends AND enemies It increases the chance you will have an interaction If you don’t like someone, propinquity will strengthen it
  • 48.
  • 49. Test Your Knowledge You are in Psych 201 with John, and the two of you become good friends over the semester. Which of the following potential reasons for your friendship is NOT based on propinquity? A. After seeing him every Tuesday and Thursday, his face becomes more and more familiar. B. You have a shared interest in psychology, so you bond over having this in common. C. You know you will see him twice a week, so you want to like him (and for him to like you) so your interactions will go smoothly. D. Of all of the seats in the classroom, you tend to sit in the two right next to each other, so you often end up chatting before class and during group activities.
  • 50. Similarity ! Which do you believe more? A. Birds of a feather flock together B. Opposites attract
  • 51. Similarity ! Engaged couples tend to be very similar... ! especially when it comes to ! demographic variables (like social class) physical characteristics (like attractiveness) and important personality traits (like extraversion or openness)
  • 52. Similarity ! Married couples tend to be more similar than chance on core personality characteristics (like extraversion or agreeableness). ! ! Interracial couples tend to be more similar in personality than same- race couples, perhaps compensating for dissimilarity on one dimension by seeking out greater similarity on others
  • 53. Similarity The belief that “opposites attract” is not supported by research If two people have complementary personality traits, they might work well together (like a dependent person with a nurturer) However, they still need similarity in other areas to be compatible, like personality traits, interests/hobbies, or backgrounds.
  • 54. Similarity: Why? 1. Similar others validate our beliefs ! When we learn that others believe the same things that we do, we feel validated ! We like people who agree with our beliefs and dislike people who disagree ! Sort of like selective evaluation ! ! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7t0PHKc_tX0&noredirect=1
  • 55. Similarity: Why? 2. Similarity Facilitates Smooth Interactions If 2 people share common beliefs, it’s easier for them to work together because they can take the basics for granted ! Davis (1981) Participants rated a number of attitudes on (a) overall importance and (b) importance for day-to-day interactions Participants rated how much they liked other people who agreed vs. disagreed with them on these attitudes ! Attitudes that are relevant for day-to-day life are more important for how much you will like someone than “important” attitudes that don’t play as much of a role in your daily conversations & interactions.
  • 56. Similarity: Why? 3. We Expect Similar Others To Like Us ! Similar others view the world the same way we do ! We like us! They must also like us! We should like them back!
  • 57. Similarity: Why? 4. Similar Others Have Qualities We Like ! We tend to think our values and qualities are the “right ones” Think about the self-image bias ! Similar others probably share these same qualities If they have good qualities, why not like them?
  • 58. Similarity Not only does similarity promote interaction, but interaction promotes similarity! Zajonc et al. (1987) – “Marriage and Similarity” Couples who were married 25+ years brought in current photos and photos from their 1st year of marriage Cropped the photos; asked unbiased people to rate how similar they looked at Time 1 and Time 2 After 25 years of marriage, couples looked more alike than they did as newlyweds!
  • 59. Why?? ! 1. Emotional Mimicry “If you keep making that face, it’ll get stuck that way” ! 2. Shared Experiences Interpersonal & Environmental
  • 60. Test Your Knowledge Your friend Jason is shy, introverted, and likes spending quiet nights in reading a good book. You want to set Jason up on a date. Which friend should you set him up with? ! A. Alex, your friend who is crazy, extraverted, and loves to party, to help Jason expand his horizons/break out of his shell and to provide a good “complement” for his personality. ! B. Taylor, your friend who is also shy, introverted, and loves reading, so they will have a lot in common and share similar interests.
  • 61. Physical Attractiveness
 
 Attractive People Are... More likely to be asked on dates ! Rated as more popular, likeable, and successful by peers ! Assumed to be more skilled, smart, and wealthy ! Paid $3,500 more per year on average for the same job ! More likely to receive help if injured ! Less likely to be convicted of crimes & given lighter sentences if convicted
  • 62. Physical Attractiveness Halo Effect ! The common belief that attractive people have a host of positive qualities that extend beyond physical appearance ! Usually an automatic inference process
  • 63. Physical Attractiveness ! The halo effect responds to cultural stereotypes In individualist cultures, attractive people seen as more assertive In collectivist cultures, attractive people seen as more empathic ! ! Interestingly, power & status show the same differences! In individualist cultures, powerful people are thought to be assertive In collectivist cultures, powerful people are thought to be generous
  • 64. Physical Attractiveness The halo effect might be due to self-fulfilling prophecies Snyder et al. (1977) Male and female participants played a “get to know you” game Spoke over the phone; conversation was recorded Men given a profile with a picture of the woman they were talking to Picture was fake. ½ got an “attractive picture,” ½ got “unattractive.” Later, RAs listened to the recording of the woman ONLY Women were rated as warmer and more socially skilled if they had talked to a man who thought they were attractive. Why? If men thought she was attractive, they spoke to her in a way that elicited those positive qualities (were nicer, more interested, etc.)
  • 65. Physical Attractiveness Effects start early! ! Attractive infants get more attention from mothers, even before leaving hospital ! Children as young as 3 months prefer looking at attractive faces Children are more comfortable with attractive strangers
  • 66. Physical Attractiveness: Why? 1. Immediacy ! As soon as you see someone, you know if they’re hot ! It takes a while to find out if they’re funny, smart, kind, etc. ! Primacy Effects – Initial information colors later judgments
  • 67. Physical Attractiveness: Why? 2. Prestige ! Attractive people and their partners assumed to be higher in social status ! Men seen with attractive women rated higher on intelligence & success
  • 68. Physical Attractiveness: Why? 3. Biology ! Physical unattractiveness can signal poor health ! ! Facial symmetry is an indicator of health, also attractiveness Symmetry = No disease or genetic problems ! ! Asymmetry usually results from problems in utero (e.g. diseases, malnutrition) ! Symmetrical adults have fewer infections than asymmetrical peers
  • 69. Which Is Most Attractive? ! A B C
  • 70. ! A B C Which Is Most Attractive?
  • 71. Physical Attractiveness www.symmeter.com ! Symmetry of physical traits is hypothesized to reflect an individual’s overall quality of development ! A symmetrical face may be a good indicator of genetic fitness ! http://dsc.discovery.com/tv- shows/other-shows/videos/ science-of-sex-appeal-the- beauty-of-symmetry.htm
  • 72. ! ! A B C Who Is Most Attractive?
  • 73. Physical Attractiveness “Average” faces are rated as more attractive Composite faces are rated as more attractive than the individual faces that went into the composite If you “average” several faces together, common features remain; unique/unusual (deviant) features get hidden http://www.faceresearch.org/demos/average + =
  • 74. Caveats Although there is some consensus about what is attractive, there is also variability! Do you have a “type”? Do all of your friends have this “type” too? Probably not! We like those who are physically attractive...BUT we also think that the people we like are more attractive! “Eye-of-the-beholder” Effort Justification Mere Exposure
  • 75. Test Your Knowledge Which of the following physical features does NOT signal health and reproductive fitness? ! A. Face “averageness” B. Bilateral facial symmetry C. Unique facial features
  • 76. Test Your Knowledge Cassie wants Blake – her new boss – to like her. To this end, Cassie should try all of the following EXCEPT: ! A. Making herself more physically attractive. B. Disagreeing with Blake to show that she can think for herself. C. Working in an office that is physically closer to Blake’s. D. Voicing similar opinions to Blake’s during casual conversations.
  • 77. Sex Differences ! Do men and women differ in what they find attractive? ! Short Answer: Yes ! Long Answer: Ehh, Not So Much
  • 78. Evolutionary Argument Parental Investment The amount of resources that go into having a child Sperm are cheap; pregnancy is not ! Because women must invest more in a given child: They should be choosier They should select mates based on ability to provide resources (e.g. wealth, skills, status) to offspring Because men have a lower investment: They can be less choosy They should select mates based on ability to biologically produce good offspring (e.g. youth, attractiveness)
  • 79.
  • 80.
  • 81.
  • 82.
  • 83. However... I cannot stress enough the importance of always thinking about whether or not there are any confounding variables!! These differences can also be (better) explained by culture ! Women in most cultures tend to have less power, fewer resources In cultures with greater gender equality, women place less importance on status/resources, more importance on physical attractiveness Women with the same level of power/status as men are just as likely to be promiscuous, have affairs, etc. It’s not about gender/sex as much as it’s about status/resources. It’s just that in most cultures, women have fewer resources.
  • 84. Test Your Knowledge Jenny is filling out an online dating profile. Based on evolutionary theories of attraction, what should she definitely include to increase her odds of being asked out? ! A. Information about how much money she makes. B. The most flattering picture that she has of herself. C. Her birthday (if she’s 22 and the average age is 28). D. Her birthday (if she’s 28 and the average age is 22). E. Two or more of the above.
  • 85. Important Points Characterizing Relationships Need To Belong Attachment Styles Attraction What causes us to be attracted to other people? What are the sex differences in attraction? Romantic Relationships What is love? What determines if we’re romantically happy? How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
  • 86. Important Points Characterizing Relationships Need To Belong Attachment Styles Attraction Propinquity, Similarity, Physical Attractiveness Women like resources, Men like biology (but confounded by culture) Romantic Relationships What is love? What determines if we’re romantically happy? How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
  • 87. Important Points Characterizing Relationships Need To Belong Attachment Styles Attraction Propinquity, Similarity, Physical Attractiveness Women like resources, Men like biology (but confounded by culture) Romantic Relationships What is love? What determines if we’re romantically happy? How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
  • 88. Triangular Theory of Love Three Components: Intimacy: Attachment, closeness, trust, connectedness Passion: Sexual attraction, desire, chemistry Commitment: Loyalty, shared plans and achievements ! These three components can be combined in different ways ! Different combinations = Different types of love
  • 89.
  • 90. Triangular Theory of Love Intimacy Passion Commitment Example Non-Love Most Personal Relationships Liking x Best Friendship Infatuation x Crush, Friend-With-Benefits Empty Love x Loveless Marriage Romantic Love x x Pre-Marriage Relationship Companionate Love x x Long-Term Marriage Fatuous Love x x Romeo & Juliet Consummate Love x x x Western Civilization Ideal
  • 91. Triangular Theory of Love Time Level Passion Intimacy Commitment Romantic Love Companionate Love Consummate Love
  • 92. Test Your Knowledge Madison and James are college seniors, and they’ve been together for the past three years. However, they’re still trying to figure out what they’re going to do after college; Madison has applied to med schools all over the country, while James is planning to stay in Illinois. How would you describe their relationship? A. Romantic Love (Intimacy + Passion) B. Companionate Love (Intimacy + Commitment) C. Fatuous Love (Passion + Commitment) D. Consummate Love (Intimacy + Passion + Commitment)
  • 93. Relationship Satisfaction Investment Model (Rusbult) Three factors influence partners’ commitment 1. Rewards-to-costs ratio 2. Quality of alternatives 3. Investments
  • 94. Relationship Satisfaction You will be happy if... You get out as much as (or slightly more than) you put in You do not have high-quality alternatives You’ve been together a while; you’ve invested a lot
  • 95. Relationship Satisfaction These three factors influence commitment Commitment determines prosocial behaviors Sacrificing for the partner, being forgiving, etc. Prosocial behaviors lead to trust, satisfaction, and well-being
  • 96. Relationship Satisfaction 1. Rewards-To-Cost Ratio ! Happy relationships have a reward-to-cost ratio of 5:1 or higher ! This means that you must have at least 5 positive experiences for every 1 negative experience
  • 98. Relationship Satisfaction 2. Quality of Alternatives Fewer Quality Alternatives = Stronger Commitment
  • 99. Relationship Satisfaction 3. Investments Putting more into the relationship leads to stronger commitment Sunk Costs Effort Justification
  • 101. Test Your Knowledge Bruce suspects that Kris wants to break up with him, so he decides to use Rusbult’s investment model to his advantage in order to manipulate her into staying with him (bad, Bruce!) ! If Bruce tells Kris that she will never find another partner as good as him and that no one else will want to date her, he is focusing on the _____ component of Rusbult’s model. ! A. Investment C. Rewards B. Alternatives D. Passion
  • 102. Test Your Knowledge Bruce suspects that Kris wants to break up with him, so he decides to use Rusbult’s investment model to his advantage in order to manipulate her into staying with him (bad, Bruce!) ! If Bruce reminds Kris about their children together, the house that they both own, and how difficult it would be to split up all of their property, he is focusing on the _______ component. ! A. Investment C. Rewards B. Alternatives D. Passion
  • 103. Four Horsemen 
 of the Apocalypse Four behaviors that can be used to predict divorce... ...with 93% ACCURACY! 1. Contempt Expressing disdain or scorn 2. Criticism Expressing negative evaluations, being overly critical 3. Defensiveness Trying to “play the victim” and not accepting responsibility for your part 4. Stonewalling Withdrawing from the conflict; ignoring and/or avoiding the issue
  • 104.
  • 105. Four Horsemen Gottman & Levenson (2000) Presence of negative affect predicts early divorce Absence of positive affect predicts later divorce ! What does this mean? ! If a lot of the time that you spend with your partner is filled with anger, anxiety, or conflict, you’re more likely to get divorced early on ! If you don’t have a lot of negative stuff but you also don’t have a lot of positive moments, you may make it for a while, but it won’t last forever.
  • 106. Oh, Kim and Kris...
 You should have seen it coming! Contempt http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g261zQJnXEU ! Criticism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpo5e7jHGqI ! Stonewalling http://youtu.be/rFBH2y4Sbvk?t=1m49s ! Defensiveness http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grBumqkW9JA
  • 108. Four Horsemen Note: If you do any of these behaviors, do not despair! This is not a “death sentence” for your romantic future ! This just lets you know what you can pay attention to if you want to ensure happier, stronger romantic bonds ! This is optimistic! No one is doomed; there are constructive ways that we can all improve. And now you know how!! ☺
  • 109. Test Your Knowledge Which of the following is NOT one of the four behaviors that are really bad for relationships? ! A. Stonewalling B. Fighting C. Contempt D. Defensiveness E. Criticism
  • 110. Creating Strong Romantic Bonds 1. Capitalize On The Good Communicating positive events with a partner increases well-being above and beyond experiencing the event itself ! Partners can respond in four ways: Active Constructive: Reacts with enthusiasm, asks follow-up questions Passive Constructive: Reacts positively, quickly moves on Active Destructive: Finds something to criticize Passive Destructive: Isn’t interested, doesn’t comment, moves on ! Which of the above do you think is the best for relationships?
  • 111. Creating Strong Romantic Bonds 1. Capitalize On The Good Communicating positive events with a partner increases well-being above and beyond experiencing the event itself ! Partners can respond in four ways: Active Constructive: Reacts with enthusiasm, asks follow-up questions Passive Constructive: Reacts positively, quickly moves on Active Destructive: Finds something to criticize Passive Destructive: Isn’t interested, doesn’t comment, moves on ! Which of the above do you think is the worst for relationships?
  • 112. Creating Strong Romantic Bonds 1. Capitalize On The Good Communicating positive events with a partner increases well-being above and beyond experiencing the event itself ! Partners can respond in four ways: Active Constructive: Reacts with enthusiasm, asks follow-up questions Passive Constructive: Reacts positively, quickly moves on Active Destructive: Finds something to criticize Passive Destructive: Isn’t interested, doesn’t comment, moves on ! Best Outcomes: Active Constructive Worst Outcomes: Active Destructive
  • 113. Creating Strong Romantic Bonds 1. Capitalize On The Good Communicating positive events with a partner increases well-being above and beyond experiencing the event itself ! Partners can respond in four ways: Active Constructive: Reacts with enthusiasm, asks follow-up questions Passive Constructive: Reacts positively, quickly moves on Active Destructive: Finds something to criticize Passive Destructive: Isn’t interested, doesn’t comment, moves on ! Grey’s Anatomy Clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=u9eHVqXOkPY&feature=youtu.be&t=2m10s Is Derek’s response (A) Constructive or (B) Destructive?
  • 114. Creating Strong Romantic Bonds 2. Be Playful The early part of a relationship is very lively! ! Avoid getting into a rut Actively seek out new activities to do together Vacations, sports, clubs, trying new restaurants... These activities keep the passion level high! ! Use humor, often Happy couples have fun nicknames, joke around, etc.
  • 116.
  • 117. Creating Strong Romantic Bonds 3. Care And Forgive Causal attributions matter! ! Unhappy Couples Internal, Stable, Global for negative events External, Unstable, Specific for positive events Happy Couples External, Unstable, Specific for negative events Internal, Stable, Global for positive events ! Cultivate a compassionate and generous view of your partner.
  • 118. Creating Strong Romantic Bonds 4. Idealize Your Partner What is idealization? Overestimating positive traits (compared to how your partner sees self) Underestimating negative traits Remember how people use self-serving biases to see themselves in a better light? Apply these to your partner, too! Idealization increases satisfaction for the person who is idealized and the person doing the idealizing! ! James Carville & Mary Matalin Video ☺ http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=5l7z0UMi6-4&feature=related&noredirect=1
  • 119. Important Points Characterizing Relationships Need To Belong Attachment Styles Attraction Propinquity, Similarity, Physical Attractiveness Women like resources, Men like biology (but confounded by culture) Romantic Relationships What is love? What determines if we’re romantically happy? How do we create satisfying relationships/marriages?
  • 120. Important Points Characterizing Relationships Need To Belong Attachment Styles Attraction Propinquity, Similarity, Physical Attractiveness Women like resources, Men like biology (but confounded by culture) Romantic Relationships Triangular Theory Investment Model; Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse Capitalize on the good, be playful, care/forgive, and idealize!
  • 121. Important Points Characterizing Relationships Need To Belong Attachment Styles Attraction Propinquity, Similarity, Physical Attractiveness Women like resources, Men like biology (but confounded by culture) Romantic Relationships Triangular Theory Investment Model; Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse Capitalize on the good, be playful, care/forgive, and idealize!
  • 122. Top Ten Things To Know Attachment Styles If given a description, be able to identify what “style” it is! ! Triangular Theory of Love ! ! Rusbult’s Investment Model ! What do we find attractive? Composite/Average Faces Symmetry Evolutionary Theories Gottman’s Research Ideal Positive-to-Negative Ratio Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse ! What does it mean that the “need to belong” is universal? ! Mere Exposure & Propinquity ! We Like Similar Others ! Self-Fulfilling Prophecies & Attractiveness