The document appears to be a presentation from a company called ICME about their business excellence and investment management services. It includes sections on their peer groups, research process, and contact with interview partners. Charts and graphs are also included comparing different countries on metrics like economic structure and dynamism. The presentation emphasizes ICME's experience and focuses on providing excellence to their clients.
15. %4
&! ( ! quot;! !
N 'I$ $ $
9/ *
M 6NO
'
'
P
I
)
?
>!
G& ,
! =- + !
15
16. %4
&! quot;! ! R !quot; !
quot;! $! !% !
A / BB7 (
>*
!quot;
Q '') ' $6 N
!
- Q IP
M $6 NO
quot;! !! $
.* $
Q ( $6 N
+
- Q '
P
7 $
quot;!
1
-
$
+
I
!!
(
?
&!
E,
)
quot; !
, !
?
K 4
&! !
? *
#,
*
quot;! !
!
&! $
E
'
$
!
( ' '( ( K K( )
$
G& ,
! =- + !
6 Excellence by Experience
17. %4 &
0 #
* ,
quot; /, !, /,
&! !
! !
ING
Both
RREEF
Cohen&Steers
! ! #
LaSalle AXA
Product scope
SIM
Curzon (AEW)
C
Invesco
Non-Focus
#
UBS
PRUPIM
!! %
Standard Life
Tishman Speyer
Commerz
Real
Aberdeen
Schroder
Fccus
national european global
Geographic orientation
= sized by Assets under Management
17
18. %4 )
- 9 : & - '(
7 ! !
quot; A / !
&R &! @
8
RREEF
&
Invesco
6 Curzon (AEW) &! $!
UBS
) LaSalle
$5 $
&! !
-$8 5
6 ) B B B &B )B
!
S
#
$
Commerz Real1
D! !!
) Schroders
!quot; ! !
Tishman Speyer
!
6 Union Investments
! !
8
! S
' # ! 'I 5 ! quot;
G !
S ! G> $ $quot; ! 5
18 Excellence by Experience
22. 2 ,
0 quot;! $! G
quot;!
%
%
A % &
5 India
Geringe strukturelle Attraktivität / Hohe strukturelle Attraktivität /
T1 * @ Hohe Dynamik Hohe Dynamik
&
T1
83 $
7 * @ Vietnam
Estonia
-3 $
C Lativa
* -@ 73
T 9 CD Brazil
Fadenkreuz zeigt Mittelwert
Turkey South Africa
* -@ -3
T 9 )D Greece des Struktur- bzw. Dynamik-
4
Thailand
Scores für die jeweilige
Spain
Slovakia Länderrisikoklasse an
Argentina
Score Dynamik
)
* quot; Sweden Canada
China USA
Poland Norway
Ireland France Australia
Lithuania
Hong Kong
Portugal Chile
3 Philippines Russia
Malaysia
E Romania
Hungary
)
T1 * @ Länderrisikoklassen:
% Bulgaria Korea, South
Taiwan New Zealand
Core
Peru
3$ Germany
Colombia
Core-Plus Austria
Luxembourg
T1 * @ Emerging
Italy
-
T Czech Republic
*9 @ 83
8D Denmark
2 Prognosebasis:
B3 $
-
United A. Emirates
Indonesia
externer Dienstleister Singapore
* -@ &)3
T 9 )D E Finland
Expertenschätzung UIR
Belgium
% UK
Japan
Geringe strukturelle Attraktivität / Hohe strukturelle Attraktivität /
Mexico
T1 Switzerland
* @ Geringe Dynamik Geringe Dynamik
1
-
1 2 3 4 5
Score Struktur
* -@ & 3
T 9 )D
B
B
*5
2 % ! !
%
,
,
! ! ' 9 :
quot;
! !
B
,
% #>2
9
,
5 ':
! ! '
quot;
22 ' G ! G E 5 -+
24. $ ! %
$ #! quot;
$ 6
Definition of peer group
! G
% !
Definition of contents
; $@ $55 G
$55
5
$55 !
50
Research and analysis
! $55 4
5D!
&! 66
1st contact with interview
# quot;! !
partners
quot; %
!
2nd contact with interview
partners
Evaluation and
presentation of results
E
@
) Excellence by Experience
25. $ ! %
0 ! quot; '' $55 quot; %
! !
! /,
D9 V :
V
UK 55 bn. €
#
*
Europe 130 bn. €
Asia 50 bn. €
>*
USA 32 bn. €
+
+
,
&D
&!
E
- Excellence by Experience
26. $ ! %&
, <-
% 4
B
! !
Sales/KAM ,
! !
B
Business Development ,
8! 5
B 5!
Financial Engineering ,
!
!
B
Research ,
>quot; 4 quot;
B
Fund Management ! $ #
,
B
Asset Management ,
B
Property Management ,
B
966 :
Facility Management ,
B
$#
Controlling & Reporting ,
4
quot;!
90 ! !
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Bedeutung
G66 66 ! 1 6 6 6 6<, 5 5
L 5 19 Q''Lquot; ! 4 =
G Q 'L Q (L Q:
6 Excellence by Experience
30. quot; ,
-
4
Calculation of Basis Calculation of Derivation of
Chronological
Portfolio (Maintaining Status Optimisation Potential for Value
Sequence
Segmentation Quo) Options Increase
XXXXXXXXX
2 XXXXXXXX
40
35
O2XXXXXXX 30
X
2 XXXXXX 25
2 2 XXXXX
20
15
O XO X X X X 10
O 1XXX 5
Y
0
O 2 2 XX
XO X 2 OX
Adjusting risk/ Examples: Calculating Assignment of
Gathering existing
return model chronological segments to
data regarding - Maintaining
(forecast regarding development of different „graph
portfolio and Status Quo
value drivers) return types“
reference objects - Renting
Calculating actual Chronological Recommendations
Segmentation - Conversion
capital value comparison of for segment
Classification of - Sale different options strategies
Evaluation AS-IS
portfolio
- New construction
analysis Determining
Requirements for
- Value increasing potential for an
gathering data in
equipment increase in value
more detail at a
later date
G *E 8
> *7 E 5 -- quot; -
,* , ;
.
30 Excellence by Experience
32. 2
$% ! !!
6 # 9 $@ :
(
& ) - #
%
4
4
%
*
(
,
(
/
& ) - 6 7
9 0
8! > 4
!
%
,
, /+
, /
,
/
Include macro and micro economic aspects
Include hard and soft factors
Grouping same real estate types into “packages”
Identification of the target group in order to adapt offer accordingly
&
Retail
) Sale of packages
Structuring by object structure, value classes, marketability and different marketing channels
-
Formulation of criteria for optimized decisions
6
Take advantage of the range of services offered by PREM units
7
?quot;
0 # /,
@ *E 8
> *7 *$ ,
8 ! $ > ! D
-- quot; - ,! ! 8 $
32 Excellence by Experience
35. 9/ quot;
8
0 ! ?C 5
>* quot;
quot; ,
0
. H
# , ;-
2!
*
2!
H
,
-
-
9
- 0
% :
-@
! L
-
7quot; C
,
&5
&- Excellence by Experience
36. 9/ quot;
8
!$ -
3
quot; * ! " +
& )
1
1 # ' !(
0 #quot;
,
T T0 ? T C T- !
quot; +
Aderenza ai requisiti di abitabilità, capacità di
*
innovazione, originalità della soluzione,
Aderenza alle specifiche
%Y
T. @ T0 T- T quot;!
generazione di ulteriori iniziative a catena, utilizzo
del bando
-
! !
progetti già presentati nel I bando, etc
T. T0 4 T- 0 T+ #
- 0
T ! T0 T T
+ quot; &
T0 4 T- !
Y
T 7 # T !
T7 Relazioni sia in senso verticale (soggetti operanti
* Rinforzo relazioni
T0 + a diversi livelli) che in senso orizzontale
# tra gli attori
T0 $ (emanazione privata, pubblica), etc
T
-
Valore
T-@ +- T!
T T finale
+
1.00
T& ? T> ! T&
T
( /
T. + quot; T> Investimenti richiesti, Piano di rientro, Criteri di
T T Ritorno economico
#Y
4 ! economicità (NPV, IRR, etc), etc
!
T T dall’investmento totale
B U T
$
T
T? T
+- !
T
Y Team di progetto, curricula, piano temporale,
Sistemi, Processi,
* rischiosità, etc
Esperienze pregresse
#$ Z
#
quot; G
= ' 22
4
. -@ 5
#
& $ ! !!
5
@
<
& 5
<
< ; quot;5 ! quot;
<0 @
@
<&
@0 E * 98. : ? !
,
&6 Excellence by Experience