SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 17
OnShoring Quality Services
       Provided by
      MGD Services
Agenda

Introduction
Background
Problem statement
Proposal
Summary
Introduction


Introduction
MGD services

   Certified Woman Owned Business
   Over 20+ years of successful quality management service providers both onsite and
   off site/near shore/virtual
   Successfully implemented off site/near shore quality services

Purpose

   Discuss current quality service provider issues and how MGD may provide a
   competitive alternative that addresses the problems hindering effective quality
   management resulting from the lack of service by the off shore provider
Background
Problem Statement
1. Current offshore services are suffering from a lack of quality within the deliverables and
   consistency
     Not getting what you are paying for
2. Companies are spending increasing amounts of time correcting, micromanaging and
   intervening in process management
     Spending time fixing the issues that should not be happening
3. Companies are not realizing the benefits and cost savings from the offshore services.
     Overall loss of ROI/profitability and reduction of cost to benefit ratio

    “The primary objective is to ensure that the perceived benefits from a low-cost
                              environment are achieved”

       “How effective is offshore out sourcing and what critical factors should be considered when
                                               outsourcing”
                     BE790.614.5DBusiness, Government and the World Economy
                       Johns Hopkins University Facilitator: Arefaine G. Yohannes
Problem Statement
                       PROS and CONS of Offshoring:

PROS                                 CONS
                                      Skill Set/Quality
Decreased resource costs             • encountering poor or unacceptable quality of work in
                                         test automation, regardless of the experience level
• - hourly rate decrease due to          touted or other defined universal methodologies
  abundant yet inexperienced labor   * Language Barriers
  force
                                     • Unquestionably many offshore resources provide
                                         communication challenges, especially over a forum that
                                         does not allow you the ability to understand accents,
                                         phrasing or written word and e-mail can be worse
                                     * Time Zone Clash
                                     • Many of the firms in Asia have as much as a 10-13 hour
                                         time difference. The outsourcing firms try to spin this as
                                         a "good thing" for you. Is it good to not be able to
                                         have your team discuss issues with their team as
                                         they arise?
                                      * Increasing Price Trends
                                     • Many offshore providers that have been successful are
                                         increasing their prices due to fact that competition for
                                         local human resources is pushing up the cost of labor.
Problem Statement (con’t.)
* Labor Backlash – it would be nice to get some positive Public Relations
There is a groundswell of backlash against the current trend toward exporting jobs outside the US. This backlash may cause negative
publicity.

According to (Bie, 2005), risks associated with offshore outsourcing for financial entities fall into four categories: operational, reputation,
legal and country-specific (not applicable)

The operational risk is the income/profitability loss resulting from an internal failure in the business model or from external events.

        Operational risks relate to quantifiable costs that may be hidden unless monitored

The reputational risk arises when the way by which services are performed by third parties reflects badly on the originating firm or
organization. Especially for financial firms, the breach of confidentiality concerning customer financial information can cause significant
damage. The transfers of information itself as well as imperfections in the service provider’s control environment are specific areas of risk. -

        If systems are not tested well this risk increases

The legal risks arise as offshore outsourcing is based on binding contractual arrangements. Besides small print problems, risks can arise
when specific contractual details become detrimental to the financial firm’s business strategy, for example if the contract is of long duration,
but the service in question reflects outdated business realities or lacks the value added benefits necessary to realize the return.

The above-mentioned risks are common to all outsourcing arrangements, but moving the service offshore, which tend to lessen direct
influence or at least increase the supervisory burden, exacerbates the risks.


 “How effective is offshore out sourcing and what critical factors should be considered when outsourcing” BE790.614.5DBusiness, Government and the World Economy Johns Hopkins
 University Facilitator: Arefaine G. Yohannes
Problem Statement
 Q: Why hasn’t the offshore QA resource experiment worked?
1.   Offshore = abundant resources and lack of experience drives low costs
       a) many resources are fresh out of school and are not trained in the fundamentals of Quality Assurance and
           testing nor do they have the system experience to provide value added services to ensure that meet expected
           quality objectives
2.   Reduced communication
       a)   hinders efficiency and requires additional cycles of review and increased time
       b) Onshore FTEs are having to micro-manage process methodologies due to lack of test lead leadership,
           capability and experience – significantly risks the client being served correctly
3.   Time zone challenge – reduced agility and flexibility, increases the overall duration and creates obstacles when speed
     coupled with quality is necessary – adds time and effort



                                                                “the primary objective is to ensure that
                                                                the perceived benefits from a low-cost
     Decreased           Increase in value
                        added benefits and/or
                                                                      environment are achieved”
     Hourly Rate
                            profitability




                   =
Problem Statement (con’t.)
Q: We significantly reduced our costs of QA resourcing that has to increase profitability… right?
1.     Off shore Rate = lack of experience – this generally increases the overall duration and requires more oversight by onshore resources
2.     FTEs are having to micro-manage the process
        a.    For every hour a FTE spends doing the work of an offshore resource the overall hourly rate increases and the effectiveness of
              that manager decreases – this increases the costs of the project overall but may stay hidden



                                              Hourly rate                      Hours spent                   Total cost of off
                                                                                                            shore project work

     FTE Manager                                $50/hour                  200 hours (fixing the                      10000
     (estimated)                                                               problems)

     Offshore QA person                         $30/hour                        1000 hours                           30000
     #1

                                                                                                                     40000

     Combined hourly rate now up from $30 to $40 reducing the cost to benefit ratio
     NOTE: The fixed costs are no longer static and no one is seeing the soft costs associated with the off shore cost increases
Proposal




Proposal
Proposal
What MGD cannot deliver.
•   The same hourly rates of off shore service providers – we can be competitive but not match.
What MGD can deliver.
• Sustainability – Pool of experienced resources to support all quality services
• Experience – Invested and motivated professionals with systems, documentation, quality process, GDP, validation, SOX
    and other regulatory systems backgrounds
• Effectively utilizing the mature client methodology – Mitigation of current issues through effective resource management
    and process leadership
• Increased value – Costs that over the lifecycle of a project will be competitive
• Flexibility, agility, delivery – On shore, off site resources with open schedules, high performing work ethic and delivery
    centric mindsets
• Leadership partnering – Oversight of Test Leads and testing resources
Ensures client will be provided the appropriate level of:
• status reporting

• Meetings coverage and thought leadership

• Process management and documentation quality review
Ensures resources are effective and exceed expectations and deadlines
Proposal
   MGD Cost comparison example –
    (NOTE: Generic test project of 8 weeks mid level complexity requiring some specialized testers)
Project 1
Assumption: FTE spends 10 hours/wk fixing issues created or not addressed by the off shore resources

Assumption: offshore work 40 hours/wk for weeks on project

                                    WK1                 WK 2                 WK3                  WK4                  WK5                  WK6                  WK7                  WK8

   Off shore        Rate      hrs     Total       hrs      Total       hrs      Total       hrs      Total       hrs      Total       hrs      Total       hrs      Total       hrs      Total
    test lead       30.00    40.00    1200       40.00     1200       40.00     1200       40.00     1200       40.00     1200       40.00     1200       40.00     1200       40.00     1200
            rec 1   22.00    40.00    880        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     1000       40.00     1000       40.00     1000       40.00     1000       40.00     1000
            rec 2   22.00    40.00    880        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     1000       40.00     1000       40.00     1000       40.00     1000       40.00     1000
            rec 3   22.00                        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     1000       40.00     1000       40.00     1000       40.00     1000       40.00     1000
            rec 4   22.00                        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     1000
            rec 5   22.00                        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     1000
            rec 6   22.00                                             40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     880        40.00     880
      FTE           50.00             500                  500                  500                  500                  500                  500                  500                  500


                                      3460                 6100                 6980                 7340                 7340                 7340                 7340                 6700 $       52,600.00


                                    WK1                 WK 2                 WK 3                 WK 4                 WK 5                 WK 6                 WK 7                 WK 8
     MGD                      hrs     Total       hrs      Total       hrs      Total       hrs      Total       hrs      Total       hrs      Total       hrs      Total       hrs      Total
Test Lead/PMO       48.00    20.00     960        20        960        20        960        30       1440        30       1440        30       1440        30       1440        30       1440
            Rec 1   37.00    20.00    740         40       1480        40       1480        30       1110        40       1480        40       1480        40       1480        30       1110
            Rec 2   37.00    20.00    740         40       1480        40       1480        30       1110        40       1480        40       1480        40       1480        30       1110
            Rec 3   30.00                         20       600         40       1200        40       1200        40       1200        40       1200        40       1200        20       600
            Rec 4   30.00                         20       600         30       900         40       1200        40       1200        40       1200        40       1200
            Rec 5   30.00                         20       600         30       900         30       900         30       900         30       900         30       900


                                          2440                 5720                 6920                 6960                 7700                 7700                 7700                 4260 $   49,400.00
Proposal

MGD is asking for an opportunity to prove out our value added services:

1.   Provide a general SOW and rate card of resource costs
2.   Estimate the next quality project to be able to compare costs and
     delivery with current supplier
3.   Initiate a project based contract
4.   Execute
Summary




Summary
Summary
• Documentation quality and process management
 issues with their current testing services provider

• MGD has a successful background of near
 shore/offsite QA and testing project/program
 execution

• MGD is asking for an opportunity to prove out the
 value added service they can provide
Q&A

Thank you!!



  www.mgdservices.com
     877-643-8378
Footnotes for references
Footnotes:

Excerpts and referenced statements provided by:

“How effective is offshore out sourcing and what critical factors should be
considered when outsourcing”
BE790.614.5DBusiness, Government and the World Economy
Johns Hopkins University Facilitator: Arefaine G. Yohannes
February 17, 2007
By Martye Karen Joyce 2/17/2007


Excerpts in the background slide for Labor backlash provided by: Bie, U.H. (2005)
Offshore Outsourcing: Consequences and Challenges for U.S.

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

2011 Ps Experience Exec Summary Greggroup
2011 Ps Experience Exec Summary Greggroup2011 Ps Experience Exec Summary Greggroup
2011 Ps Experience Exec Summary Greggroup
gbs5230
 

Mais procurados (6)

Transforming HR in an Uncertain Economy: Priorities and Processes That Delive...
Transforming HR in an Uncertain Economy: Priorities and Processes That Delive...Transforming HR in an Uncertain Economy: Priorities and Processes That Delive...
Transforming HR in an Uncertain Economy: Priorities and Processes That Delive...
 
Mandatory Training Review Version 3 3[1]
Mandatory Training Review Version 3 3[1]Mandatory Training Review Version 3 3[1]
Mandatory Training Review Version 3 3[1]
 
Doing the Wrong Things Righter?
Doing the Wrong Things Righter?Doing the Wrong Things Righter?
Doing the Wrong Things Righter?
 
NVQ Portfolio 2011-12
NVQ Portfolio 2011-12NVQ Portfolio 2011-12
NVQ Portfolio 2011-12
 
The Power of Alliance
The Power of AllianceThe Power of Alliance
The Power of Alliance
 
2011 Ps Experience Exec Summary Greggroup
2011 Ps Experience Exec Summary Greggroup2011 Ps Experience Exec Summary Greggroup
2011 Ps Experience Exec Summary Greggroup
 

Semelhante a MGD Onshoring

Theory of Constraints and Project Management: Challenging the Dominant Paradigm
Theory of Constraints and Project Management: Challenging the Dominant ParadigmTheory of Constraints and Project Management: Challenging the Dominant Paradigm
Theory of Constraints and Project Management: Challenging the Dominant Paradigm
Scott Abel
 
A General Guide To Outsourcing
A General Guide To OutsourcingA General Guide To Outsourcing
A General Guide To Outsourcing
euwebsc01
 
A General Guide To Outsourcing
A General Guide To OutsourcingA General Guide To Outsourcing
A General Guide To Outsourcing
euweben01
 
A General Guide To Outsourcing
A General Guide To OutsourcingA General Guide To Outsourcing
A General Guide To Outsourcing
euwebtc01
 
Delivery & Commercial Capability Programme - Understanding complexity - Andy ...
Delivery & Commercial Capability Programme - Understanding complexity - Andy ...Delivery & Commercial Capability Programme - Understanding complexity - Andy ...
Delivery & Commercial Capability Programme - Understanding complexity - Andy ...
Association for Project Management
 
Accenture TM Nillezen Sustainable Performance Improvement V1 [Compatibility ...
Accenture TM Nillezen  Sustainable Performance Improvement V1 [Compatibility ...Accenture TM Nillezen  Sustainable Performance Improvement V1 [Compatibility ...
Accenture TM Nillezen Sustainable Performance Improvement V1 [Compatibility ...
tmnillezen
 
Valerie Bonebrake from Tompkins Associates; Outsourcing Logistics Success: A ...
Valerie Bonebrake from Tompkins Associates; Outsourcing Logistics Success: A ...Valerie Bonebrake from Tompkins Associates; Outsourcing Logistics Success: A ...
Valerie Bonebrake from Tompkins Associates; Outsourcing Logistics Success: A ...
eyefortransport
 

Semelhante a MGD Onshoring (20)

Project Management Essentials
Project Management EssentialsProject Management Essentials
Project Management Essentials
 
The Business Case for Test Environment Management Services
The Business Case for Test Environment Management ServicesThe Business Case for Test Environment Management Services
The Business Case for Test Environment Management Services
 
Theory of Constraints and Project Management: Challenging the Dominant Paradigm
Theory of Constraints and Project Management: Challenging the Dominant ParadigmTheory of Constraints and Project Management: Challenging the Dominant Paradigm
Theory of Constraints and Project Management: Challenging the Dominant Paradigm
 
Demystifying Outsourcing and Global Services Delivery
Demystifying Outsourcing and Global Services DeliveryDemystifying Outsourcing and Global Services Delivery
Demystifying Outsourcing and Global Services Delivery
 
A General Guide To Outsourcing
A General Guide To OutsourcingA General Guide To Outsourcing
A General Guide To Outsourcing
 
A General Guide To Outsourcing
A General Guide To OutsourcingA General Guide To Outsourcing
A General Guide To Outsourcing
 
A General Guide To Outsourcing
A General Guide To OutsourcingA General Guide To Outsourcing
A General Guide To Outsourcing
 
Orange case study v0 04 lar 210110
Orange case study v0 04 lar 210110Orange case study v0 04 lar 210110
Orange case study v0 04 lar 210110
 
10 c-draft-earthsoft-project management-detailed-experience based
10 c-draft-earthsoft-project management-detailed-experience based10 c-draft-earthsoft-project management-detailed-experience based
10 c-draft-earthsoft-project management-detailed-experience based
 
Delivery & Commercial Capability Programme - Understanding complexity - Andy ...
Delivery & Commercial Capability Programme - Understanding complexity - Andy ...Delivery & Commercial Capability Programme - Understanding complexity - Andy ...
Delivery & Commercial Capability Programme - Understanding complexity - Andy ...
 
An approach for costing, pricing, and managing ffp
An approach for costing, pricing, and managing ffpAn approach for costing, pricing, and managing ffp
An approach for costing, pricing, and managing ffp
 
Outsourcing and offshoring: implementation and risk reduction, by Anthony Mit...
Outsourcing and offshoring: implementation and risk reduction, by Anthony Mit...Outsourcing and offshoring: implementation and risk reduction, by Anthony Mit...
Outsourcing and offshoring: implementation and risk reduction, by Anthony Mit...
 
Accenture TM Nillezen Sustainable Performance Improvement V1 [Compatibility ...
Accenture TM Nillezen  Sustainable Performance Improvement V1 [Compatibility ...Accenture TM Nillezen  Sustainable Performance Improvement V1 [Compatibility ...
Accenture TM Nillezen Sustainable Performance Improvement V1 [Compatibility ...
 
A prescription for saving money case study
A prescription for saving money   case studyA prescription for saving money   case study
A prescription for saving money case study
 
Group b opm-ppt_final
Group b opm-ppt_finalGroup b opm-ppt_final
Group b opm-ppt_final
 
Project Management Framework
Project Management FrameworkProject Management Framework
Project Management Framework
 
Valerie Bonebrake from Tompkins Associates; Outsourcing Logistics Success: A ...
Valerie Bonebrake from Tompkins Associates; Outsourcing Logistics Success: A ...Valerie Bonebrake from Tompkins Associates; Outsourcing Logistics Success: A ...
Valerie Bonebrake from Tompkins Associates; Outsourcing Logistics Success: A ...
 
The Business Value Of Project Management powerpoint presentation
The Business Value Of Project Management powerpoint presentationThe Business Value Of Project Management powerpoint presentation
The Business Value Of Project Management powerpoint presentation
 
Shutdowns and Turnarounds 2010 Egypt
Shutdowns and Turnarounds 2010 EgyptShutdowns and Turnarounds 2010 Egypt
Shutdowns and Turnarounds 2010 Egypt
 
New pmp exam webinar slide no annotation (No Annotation)
New pmp exam webinar slide  no annotation (No Annotation)New pmp exam webinar slide  no annotation (No Annotation)
New pmp exam webinar slide no annotation (No Annotation)
 

Mais de Maggie

Website
WebsiteWebsite
Website
Maggie
 
Worksheets charts2012 111113
Worksheets charts2012 111113Worksheets charts2012 111113
Worksheets charts2012 111113
Maggie
 
Coverpage 112013
Coverpage 112013Coverpage 112013
Coverpage 112013
Maggie
 
Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 111113
Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 111113Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 111113
Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 111113
Maggie
 
Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 110513
Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 110513Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 110513
Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 110513
Maggie
 
Coaching models- MSBCoach
Coaching models- MSBCoachCoaching models- MSBCoach
Coaching models- MSBCoach
Maggie
 
360sample MSBCoach
360sample MSBCoach360sample MSBCoach
360sample MSBCoach
Maggie
 
Tip sheet and assessment sample
Tip sheet and assessment sampleTip sheet and assessment sample
Tip sheet and assessment sample
Maggie
 
Eq2011interiorforweb
Eq2011interiorforwebEq2011interiorforweb
Eq2011interiorforweb
Maggie
 
New client info packet
New client info packetNew client info packet
New client info packet
Maggie
 
2011workshops
2011workshops2011workshops
2011workshops
Maggie
 
MSBCoach Business Manual
MSBCoach Business ManualMSBCoach Business Manual
MSBCoach Business Manual
Maggie
 
Resume examples
Resume examplesResume examples
Resume examples
Maggie
 
Resume examples
Resume examplesResume examples
Resume examples
Maggie
 
Public Policy WHY?
Public Policy WHY?Public Policy WHY?
Public Policy WHY?
Maggie
 

Mais de Maggie (20)

Website
WebsiteWebsite
Website
 
Worksheets charts2012 111113
Worksheets charts2012 111113Worksheets charts2012 111113
Worksheets charts2012 111113
 
Coverpage 112013
Coverpage 112013Coverpage 112013
Coverpage 112013
 
Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 111113
Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 111113Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 111113
Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 111113
 
Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 110513
Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 110513Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 110513
Msbcoac hbusinessmanual 110513
 
Coaching models- MSBCoach
Coaching models- MSBCoachCoaching models- MSBCoach
Coaching models- MSBCoach
 
360sample MSBCoach
360sample MSBCoach360sample MSBCoach
360sample MSBCoach
 
My Brain: Intro to brain science A Curriculum for 1st - 3rd Graders
My Brain: Intro to brain science A Curriculum for 1st - 3rd GradersMy Brain: Intro to brain science A Curriculum for 1st - 3rd Graders
My Brain: Intro to brain science A Curriculum for 1st - 3rd Graders
 
Tip sheet and assessment sample
Tip sheet and assessment sampleTip sheet and assessment sample
Tip sheet and assessment sample
 
Eq2011interiorforweb
Eq2011interiorforwebEq2011interiorforweb
Eq2011interiorforweb
 
New client info packet
New client info packetNew client info packet
New client info packet
 
Jeffersonon leadership
Jeffersonon leadershipJeffersonon leadership
Jeffersonon leadership
 
2011workshops
2011workshops2011workshops
2011workshops
 
MSBCoach Business Manual
MSBCoach Business ManualMSBCoach Business Manual
MSBCoach Business Manual
 
Resume examples
Resume examplesResume examples
Resume examples
 
Resume examples
Resume examplesResume examples
Resume examples
 
Public Policy WHY?
Public Policy WHY?Public Policy WHY?
Public Policy WHY?
 
MSBCoach LLC Business Manual
MSBCoach LLC Business Manual MSBCoach LLC Business Manual
MSBCoach LLC Business Manual
 
Lousy Leadership
Lousy LeadershipLousy Leadership
Lousy Leadership
 
Registration guests
Registration guestsRegistration guests
Registration guests
 

MGD Onshoring

  • 1. OnShoring Quality Services Provided by MGD Services
  • 3. Introduction Introduction MGD services Certified Woman Owned Business Over 20+ years of successful quality management service providers both onsite and off site/near shore/virtual Successfully implemented off site/near shore quality services Purpose Discuss current quality service provider issues and how MGD may provide a competitive alternative that addresses the problems hindering effective quality management resulting from the lack of service by the off shore provider
  • 5. Problem Statement 1. Current offshore services are suffering from a lack of quality within the deliverables and consistency  Not getting what you are paying for 2. Companies are spending increasing amounts of time correcting, micromanaging and intervening in process management  Spending time fixing the issues that should not be happening 3. Companies are not realizing the benefits and cost savings from the offshore services.  Overall loss of ROI/profitability and reduction of cost to benefit ratio “The primary objective is to ensure that the perceived benefits from a low-cost environment are achieved” “How effective is offshore out sourcing and what critical factors should be considered when outsourcing” BE790.614.5DBusiness, Government and the World Economy Johns Hopkins University Facilitator: Arefaine G. Yohannes
  • 6. Problem Statement PROS and CONS of Offshoring: PROS CONS Skill Set/Quality Decreased resource costs • encountering poor or unacceptable quality of work in test automation, regardless of the experience level • - hourly rate decrease due to touted or other defined universal methodologies abundant yet inexperienced labor * Language Barriers force • Unquestionably many offshore resources provide communication challenges, especially over a forum that does not allow you the ability to understand accents, phrasing or written word and e-mail can be worse * Time Zone Clash • Many of the firms in Asia have as much as a 10-13 hour time difference. The outsourcing firms try to spin this as a "good thing" for you. Is it good to not be able to have your team discuss issues with their team as they arise? * Increasing Price Trends • Many offshore providers that have been successful are increasing their prices due to fact that competition for local human resources is pushing up the cost of labor.
  • 7. Problem Statement (con’t.) * Labor Backlash – it would be nice to get some positive Public Relations There is a groundswell of backlash against the current trend toward exporting jobs outside the US. This backlash may cause negative publicity. According to (Bie, 2005), risks associated with offshore outsourcing for financial entities fall into four categories: operational, reputation, legal and country-specific (not applicable) The operational risk is the income/profitability loss resulting from an internal failure in the business model or from external events. Operational risks relate to quantifiable costs that may be hidden unless monitored The reputational risk arises when the way by which services are performed by third parties reflects badly on the originating firm or organization. Especially for financial firms, the breach of confidentiality concerning customer financial information can cause significant damage. The transfers of information itself as well as imperfections in the service provider’s control environment are specific areas of risk. - If systems are not tested well this risk increases The legal risks arise as offshore outsourcing is based on binding contractual arrangements. Besides small print problems, risks can arise when specific contractual details become detrimental to the financial firm’s business strategy, for example if the contract is of long duration, but the service in question reflects outdated business realities or lacks the value added benefits necessary to realize the return. The above-mentioned risks are common to all outsourcing arrangements, but moving the service offshore, which tend to lessen direct influence or at least increase the supervisory burden, exacerbates the risks. “How effective is offshore out sourcing and what critical factors should be considered when outsourcing” BE790.614.5DBusiness, Government and the World Economy Johns Hopkins University Facilitator: Arefaine G. Yohannes
  • 8. Problem Statement Q: Why hasn’t the offshore QA resource experiment worked? 1. Offshore = abundant resources and lack of experience drives low costs a) many resources are fresh out of school and are not trained in the fundamentals of Quality Assurance and testing nor do they have the system experience to provide value added services to ensure that meet expected quality objectives 2. Reduced communication a) hinders efficiency and requires additional cycles of review and increased time b) Onshore FTEs are having to micro-manage process methodologies due to lack of test lead leadership, capability and experience – significantly risks the client being served correctly 3. Time zone challenge – reduced agility and flexibility, increases the overall duration and creates obstacles when speed coupled with quality is necessary – adds time and effort “the primary objective is to ensure that the perceived benefits from a low-cost Decreased Increase in value added benefits and/or environment are achieved” Hourly Rate profitability =
  • 9. Problem Statement (con’t.) Q: We significantly reduced our costs of QA resourcing that has to increase profitability… right? 1. Off shore Rate = lack of experience – this generally increases the overall duration and requires more oversight by onshore resources 2. FTEs are having to micro-manage the process a. For every hour a FTE spends doing the work of an offshore resource the overall hourly rate increases and the effectiveness of that manager decreases – this increases the costs of the project overall but may stay hidden Hourly rate Hours spent Total cost of off shore project work FTE Manager $50/hour 200 hours (fixing the 10000 (estimated) problems) Offshore QA person $30/hour 1000 hours 30000 #1 40000 Combined hourly rate now up from $30 to $40 reducing the cost to benefit ratio NOTE: The fixed costs are no longer static and no one is seeing the soft costs associated with the off shore cost increases
  • 11. Proposal What MGD cannot deliver. • The same hourly rates of off shore service providers – we can be competitive but not match. What MGD can deliver. • Sustainability – Pool of experienced resources to support all quality services • Experience – Invested and motivated professionals with systems, documentation, quality process, GDP, validation, SOX and other regulatory systems backgrounds • Effectively utilizing the mature client methodology – Mitigation of current issues through effective resource management and process leadership • Increased value – Costs that over the lifecycle of a project will be competitive • Flexibility, agility, delivery – On shore, off site resources with open schedules, high performing work ethic and delivery centric mindsets • Leadership partnering – Oversight of Test Leads and testing resources Ensures client will be provided the appropriate level of: • status reporting • Meetings coverage and thought leadership • Process management and documentation quality review Ensures resources are effective and exceed expectations and deadlines
  • 12. Proposal MGD Cost comparison example – (NOTE: Generic test project of 8 weeks mid level complexity requiring some specialized testers) Project 1 Assumption: FTE spends 10 hours/wk fixing issues created or not addressed by the off shore resources Assumption: offshore work 40 hours/wk for weeks on project WK1 WK 2 WK3 WK4 WK5 WK6 WK7 WK8 Off shore Rate hrs Total hrs Total hrs Total hrs Total hrs Total hrs Total hrs Total hrs Total test lead 30.00 40.00 1200 40.00 1200 40.00 1200 40.00 1200 40.00 1200 40.00 1200 40.00 1200 40.00 1200 rec 1 22.00 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 1000 40.00 1000 40.00 1000 40.00 1000 40.00 1000 rec 2 22.00 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 1000 40.00 1000 40.00 1000 40.00 1000 40.00 1000 rec 3 22.00 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 1000 40.00 1000 40.00 1000 40.00 1000 40.00 1000 rec 4 22.00 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 1000 rec 5 22.00 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 1000 rec 6 22.00 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 880 40.00 880 FTE 50.00 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 3460 6100 6980 7340 7340 7340 7340 6700 $ 52,600.00 WK1 WK 2 WK 3 WK 4 WK 5 WK 6 WK 7 WK 8 MGD hrs Total hrs Total hrs Total hrs Total hrs Total hrs Total hrs Total hrs Total Test Lead/PMO 48.00 20.00 960 20 960 20 960 30 1440 30 1440 30 1440 30 1440 30 1440 Rec 1 37.00 20.00 740 40 1480 40 1480 30 1110 40 1480 40 1480 40 1480 30 1110 Rec 2 37.00 20.00 740 40 1480 40 1480 30 1110 40 1480 40 1480 40 1480 30 1110 Rec 3 30.00 20 600 40 1200 40 1200 40 1200 40 1200 40 1200 20 600 Rec 4 30.00 20 600 30 900 40 1200 40 1200 40 1200 40 1200 Rec 5 30.00 20 600 30 900 30 900 30 900 30 900 30 900 2440 5720 6920 6960 7700 7700 7700 4260 $ 49,400.00
  • 13. Proposal MGD is asking for an opportunity to prove out our value added services: 1. Provide a general SOW and rate card of resource costs 2. Estimate the next quality project to be able to compare costs and delivery with current supplier 3. Initiate a project based contract 4. Execute
  • 15. Summary • Documentation quality and process management issues with their current testing services provider • MGD has a successful background of near shore/offsite QA and testing project/program execution • MGD is asking for an opportunity to prove out the value added service they can provide
  • 16. Q&A Thank you!! www.mgdservices.com 877-643-8378
  • 17. Footnotes for references Footnotes: Excerpts and referenced statements provided by: “How effective is offshore out sourcing and what critical factors should be considered when outsourcing” BE790.614.5DBusiness, Government and the World Economy Johns Hopkins University Facilitator: Arefaine G. Yohannes February 17, 2007 By Martye Karen Joyce 2/17/2007 Excerpts in the background slide for Labor backlash provided by: Bie, U.H. (2005) Offshore Outsourcing: Consequences and Challenges for U.S.