SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 2
Year Sem                    Unit Role      Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Questions
  2004        2 IP      Tutor      5.8             4.2    4.3   4.3    4.2    4.2    4.1   4.7   4.0   4.0     4.6     4.1   4.0      4.0
                                                                                                                                     4.2 1.  All things considered, how would you rate the teaching of this lecturer in this unit?
  2005        1 SM      Tutor      7.0             4.8    4.8   5.0    4.8    5.0    4.4   5.0   4.8   4.6     4.6     4.6   4.4     4.2 2.  The lecturer made the objectives clear for each session.
                                                                                                                                      4.6
  2005        1 GBR Tutor          6.1             4.8    4.7   4.8    4.4    4.7    4.5   4.7   4.3   4.2     4.3     4.3   4.4      4.2
                                                                                                                                     4.5 3.  The lecturer was able to explain concepts clearly.
  2005        1 PDN Tutor          6.0             4.3    4.3   4.4    4.2    4.4    4.0   4.6   4.1   3.9     3.7     4.3   4.4      4.1
                                                                                                                                     4.2 4.  The lecturer seemed well prepared for each session.
  2005        2 GBR Both           5.5             3.9    4.0   4.3    3.9    4.3    3.9   4.3   3.7   3.3     3.4     4.0   3.9      3.7
                                                                                                                                     3.9 5.  The lecturer taught the unit matter in a way that helped me understand it.
  2006        1 GBR Lecturer       5.3             4.0    3.9   4.4    3.5    3.7    3.7   3.3   3.8   3.9     3.6     3.9   4.0      3.6
                                                                                                                                     3.6 6.  The lecturer tried to make the unit interesting.
  2006        2 LIC     Lecturer   5.8             4.2    4.3   4.4    4.2    4.4    4.0   4.4   3.8   4.1     4.0     4.3   4.2     4.1 7.  The lecturer demonstrated the relevance of the unit to the whole course.
                                                                                                                                      3.9
  2007        1 GBR Lecturer       6.0             5.8    5.7   6.3    5.4    5.9    5.5   5.2   5.7   5.5     5.2     5.7   5.7      5.3
                                                                                                                                     5.0 8.  The lecturer made opportunities to ask questions.
  2007        2 LIC     Lecturer   5.9             5.7    5.8   6.0    5.7    6.1    5.5   5.5   5.2   5.4     4.8     5.5   5.5      5.2
                                                                                                                                     5.6 9.  The lecturer was available for consultation.
  2008        1 GBR Lecturer       5.8             5.7    5.6   6.1    5.6    6.3    5.5   5.3   5.1   5.5     5.0     5.6   5.7      5.5
                                                                                                                                     4.6 10.   The lecturer made clear the criteria used to assess student work.
  2008        2 LIC     Lecturer   5.9             5.8    5.9   6.0    5.8    6.1    5.7   5.7   5.5   5.7     5.3     5.7   5.6      5.4
                                                                                                                                     5.5 11. The lecturer gave adequate feedback on assignments and other prescribed work.
  2009        1 GBR Lecturer       5.9             6.0    5.8   6.4    5.4    5.9    5.5   5.0   5.4   5.5     5.4     5.8   5.7     5.3 12.   The unit covered what the unit description said it would.
                                                                                                                                      5.5
Legend:                                                                                                                                  13.   Assessment tasks set and/or exams were related to unit goals.
IP = International Politics                              LIC = Leadership, Innovation & Change                                           14.   Assessment tasks allowed me to demonstrate what I had learnt.
SM = Strategic Management                                The role of 'Tutor' does not include responsibility for curriculum design       15.   The workload was comparable to other units at this level.
PDN = Politics of Developing Nations                     The role of 'Lecturer' includes full responsibilties for convening the unit
GBR= Government-Business Relations                       NOTE: This record is a complete history of my teaching feedback @UC

                                                                                           Graph 1: Longitudinal Feedback Summary
                      8.0


                      7.0


                      6.0


                      5.0
    Result out of 7




                      4.0


                      3.0


                      2.0


                      1.0


                      0.0
                             Column E   Column F   Column G       Column H          Column I     Column J    Column K        Column L       Column M   Column N   Column O   Column P     Column Q   Column R   Column S

                                                                                                                     Question Number
                                                          Row 2       Row 3     Row 4          Row 5   Row 6         Row 7    Row 8         Row 8   Row 10   Row 11    Row 12    Row 13
ongitudinal Feedback Summary




 Column K   Column L   Column M   Column N   Column O   Column P     Column Q   Column R   Column S

    Question Number
6   Row 7    Row 8     Row 8   Row 10   Row 11    Row 12    Row 13

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais de University of Canberra

Australia in the Atomic Age: Menzies Legacy
Australia in the Atomic Age: Menzies LegacyAustralia in the Atomic Age: Menzies Legacy
Australia in the Atomic Age: Menzies Legacy
University of Canberra
 
Australia in the Atomic Age: Menzies Legacy.pptx
Australia in the Atomic Age: Menzies Legacy.pptxAustralia in the Atomic Age: Menzies Legacy.pptx
Australia in the Atomic Age: Menzies Legacy.pptx
University of Canberra
 
Political Leadership and the National Cabinet.pptx
Political Leadership and the National Cabinet.pptxPolitical Leadership and the National Cabinet.pptx
Political Leadership and the National Cabinet.pptx
University of Canberra
 
Diagrammatical Approaches to Operationalising Historical Institutionalism as ...
Diagrammatical Approaches to Operationalising Historical Institutionalism as ...Diagrammatical Approaches to Operationalising Historical Institutionalism as ...
Diagrammatical Approaches to Operationalising Historical Institutionalism as ...
University of Canberra
 
Using historical institutionalism as a method for qualitative process tracing...
Using historical institutionalism as a method for qualitative process tracing...Using historical institutionalism as a method for qualitative process tracing...
Using historical institutionalism as a method for qualitative process tracing...
University of Canberra
 

Mais de University of Canberra (20)

Transport Options for South Canberra: Light Rail versus Buses
Transport Options for South Canberra: Light Rail versus BusesTransport Options for South Canberra: Light Rail versus Buses
Transport Options for South Canberra: Light Rail versus Buses
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
 
The Institutional Origins of Canada’s Telecommunications Mosaic
The Institutional Origins of Canada’s Telecommunications MosaicThe Institutional Origins of Canada’s Telecommunications Mosaic
The Institutional Origins of Canada’s Telecommunications Mosaic
 
Australia in the Atomic Age: Menzies Legacy
Australia in the Atomic Age: Menzies LegacyAustralia in the Atomic Age: Menzies Legacy
Australia in the Atomic Age: Menzies Legacy
 
Public Policy: From the Hustings
Public Policy: From the HustingsPublic Policy: From the Hustings
Public Policy: From the Hustings
 
Australia’s Nuclear Future: It's your choice
Australia’s Nuclear Future: It's your choiceAustralia’s Nuclear Future: It's your choice
Australia’s Nuclear Future: It's your choice
 
Australia in the Atomic Age: Menzies Legacy.pptx
Australia in the Atomic Age: Menzies Legacy.pptxAustralia in the Atomic Age: Menzies Legacy.pptx
Australia in the Atomic Age: Menzies Legacy.pptx
 
Political Leadership and the National Cabinet.pptx
Political Leadership and the National Cabinet.pptxPolitical Leadership and the National Cabinet.pptx
Political Leadership and the National Cabinet.pptx
 
From Globalization to Globalism: The Impact of Populism on Multilateral Insti...
From Globalization to Globalism: The Impact of Populism on Multilateral Insti...From Globalization to Globalism: The Impact of Populism on Multilateral Insti...
From Globalization to Globalism: The Impact of Populism on Multilateral Insti...
 
Historical Institutionalism as Method
Historical Institutionalism as MethodHistorical Institutionalism as Method
Historical Institutionalism as Method
 
A Contest of Ideas: Teaching Politics in Australia
A Contest of Ideas: Teaching Politics in AustraliaA Contest of Ideas: Teaching Politics in Australia
A Contest of Ideas: Teaching Politics in Australia
 
Nuclear Energy in Australia From Barriers to Benefits.pptx
Nuclear Energy in Australia From Barriers to Benefits.pptxNuclear Energy in Australia From Barriers to Benefits.pptx
Nuclear Energy in Australia From Barriers to Benefits.pptx
 
What are the possibilities for hydrogen?
What are the possibilities for hydrogen?What are the possibilities for hydrogen?
What are the possibilities for hydrogen?
 
Contemporary Issues in Multimodal Transport.pptx
Contemporary Issues in Multimodal Transport.pptxContemporary Issues in Multimodal Transport.pptx
Contemporary Issues in Multimodal Transport.pptx
 
The Hydrogen Fuel Discussion
The Hydrogen Fuel DiscussionThe Hydrogen Fuel Discussion
The Hydrogen Fuel Discussion
 
Road Pricing and Electric Vehicles: Where to from here?
Road Pricing and Electric Vehicles: Where to from here?Road Pricing and Electric Vehicles: Where to from here?
Road Pricing and Electric Vehicles: Where to from here?
 
Diagrammatical Approaches to Operationalising Historical Institutionalism as ...
Diagrammatical Approaches to Operationalising Historical Institutionalism as ...Diagrammatical Approaches to Operationalising Historical Institutionalism as ...
Diagrammatical Approaches to Operationalising Historical Institutionalism as ...
 
Using historical institutionalism as a method for qualitative process tracing...
Using historical institutionalism as a method for qualitative process tracing...Using historical institutionalism as a method for qualitative process tracing...
Using historical institutionalism as a method for qualitative process tracing...
 
Road Pricing and Provision: Solving public policy challenges
Road Pricing and Provision: Solving public policy challengesRoad Pricing and Provision: Solving public policy challenges
Road Pricing and Provision: Solving public policy challenges
 
The Politics of Road Reform: The challenges ahead for road pricing and provision
The Politics of Road Reform: The challenges ahead for road pricing and provisionThe Politics of Road Reform: The challenges ahead for road pricing and provision
The Politics of Road Reform: The challenges ahead for road pricing and provision
 

Último

Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functionsSalient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
KarakKing
 

Último (20)

Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
 
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structureSingle or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
 
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
FSB Advising Checklist - Orientation 2024
 
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
 
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - EnglishGraduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
 
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptxREMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
 
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptxExploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
 
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptxWellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
 
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functionsSalient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
 
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
 
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
 
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptxTowards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
 
How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17
How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17
How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17
 
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptxHMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
 
Plant propagation: Sexual and Asexual propapagation.pptx
Plant propagation: Sexual and Asexual propapagation.pptxPlant propagation: Sexual and Asexual propapagation.pptx
Plant propagation: Sexual and Asexual propapagation.pptx
 

Michael De Percy Feedback Summary 2004-2009

  • 1. Year Sem Unit Role Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Questions 2004 2 IP Tutor 5.8 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.7 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.2 1.  All things considered, how would you rate the teaching of this lecturer in this unit? 2005 1 SM Tutor 7.0 4.8 4.8 5.0 4.8 5.0 4.4 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.4 4.2 2.  The lecturer made the objectives clear for each session. 4.6 2005 1 GBR Tutor 6.1 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.4 4.7 4.5 4.7 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.5 3.  The lecturer was able to explain concepts clearly. 2005 1 PDN Tutor 6.0 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.0 4.6 4.1 3.9 3.7 4.3 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.  The lecturer seemed well prepared for each session. 2005 2 GBR Both 5.5 3.9 4.0 4.3 3.9 4.3 3.9 4.3 3.7 3.3 3.4 4.0 3.9 3.7 3.9 5.  The lecturer taught the unit matter in a way that helped me understand it. 2006 1 GBR Lecturer 5.3 4.0 3.9 4.4 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.3 3.8 3.9 3.6 3.9 4.0 3.6 3.6 6.  The lecturer tried to make the unit interesting. 2006 2 LIC Lecturer 5.8 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.0 4.4 3.8 4.1 4.0 4.3 4.2 4.1 7.  The lecturer demonstrated the relevance of the unit to the whole course. 3.9 2007 1 GBR Lecturer 6.0 5.8 5.7 6.3 5.4 5.9 5.5 5.2 5.7 5.5 5.2 5.7 5.7 5.3 5.0 8.  The lecturer made opportunities to ask questions. 2007 2 LIC Lecturer 5.9 5.7 5.8 6.0 5.7 6.1 5.5 5.5 5.2 5.4 4.8 5.5 5.5 5.2 5.6 9.  The lecturer was available for consultation. 2008 1 GBR Lecturer 5.8 5.7 5.6 6.1 5.6 6.3 5.5 5.3 5.1 5.5 5.0 5.6 5.7 5.5 4.6 10.   The lecturer made clear the criteria used to assess student work. 2008 2 LIC Lecturer 5.9 5.8 5.9 6.0 5.8 6.1 5.7 5.7 5.5 5.7 5.3 5.7 5.6 5.4 5.5 11. The lecturer gave adequate feedback on assignments and other prescribed work. 2009 1 GBR Lecturer 5.9 6.0 5.8 6.4 5.4 5.9 5.5 5.0 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.8 5.7 5.3 12.   The unit covered what the unit description said it would. 5.5 Legend: 13.   Assessment tasks set and/or exams were related to unit goals. IP = International Politics LIC = Leadership, Innovation & Change 14.   Assessment tasks allowed me to demonstrate what I had learnt. SM = Strategic Management The role of 'Tutor' does not include responsibility for curriculum design 15.   The workload was comparable to other units at this level. PDN = Politics of Developing Nations The role of 'Lecturer' includes full responsibilties for convening the unit GBR= Government-Business Relations NOTE: This record is a complete history of my teaching feedback @UC Graph 1: Longitudinal Feedback Summary 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 Result out of 7 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Column E Column F Column G Column H Column I Column J Column K Column L Column M Column N Column O Column P Column Q Column R Column S Question Number Row 2 Row 3 Row 4 Row 5 Row 6 Row 7 Row 8 Row 8 Row 10 Row 11 Row 12 Row 13
  • 2. ongitudinal Feedback Summary Column K Column L Column M Column N Column O Column P Column Q Column R Column S Question Number 6 Row 7 Row 8 Row 8 Row 10 Row 11 Row 12 Row 13