SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 14
Baixar para ler offline
Community Information
Meeting: The Future of Public
Education in Shelby County
         January 19, 2011

            Daniel Kiel
     The University of Memphis
          School of Law
Shelby County Comparison:
        Government vs. Schools
     Shelby County 
                              Shelby County Schools
      Government
 Serves ENTIRETY of           Serves only the portion of 
  Shelby County (including      Shelby County outside of 
  Memphians and non‐            the Memphis city limits
  Memphians)
Individual 1: The Memphian
                                                Votes for Member of
        PATH OF PROPERTY TAXES
                                                Memphis City School
                                                Board
            City of Memphis Taxpayer
                                                Children Assigned to
                                                Attend Memphis City
City of Memphis                Shelby County    Schools
  Government                    Government
Individual 2: The Non‐Memphian

 PATH OF PROPERTY TAXES

                             Votes for Members of
  Taxpayer Outside Memphis   Shelby County School
                             Board

      Shelby County 
                             Children Assigned to
       Government            Attend Shelby County
                             Schools
Funding Sources
 Source
                                   (103,593 students)   (47,342 students)

 State of Tennessee                     $428M               $174M
                                       (49.5%)             (50.7%)
 Shelby County Property Taxes           $255M               $115M
 (paid by all county residents –
 Memphian and non‐Memphian)            (29.5%)             (33.5%)
 Shelby County Sales Taxes              $89M                $43M
                                       (10.3%)             (12.6%)
 City of Memphis Property Taxes         $84M                  N/A
 (paid only by Memphians)
                                       (9.8%)
 Other                                  $8M                  $10M
                                       (1.0%)               (3.0%)
Why Change the Status Quo?: 
     Interests of the Two Districts



 Continued Local     Sustainability in
  Control              Funding
Strategy: SCS Conversion to 
              Special School District

Currently: SCS is a “County” District

Changes if SCS Converted to Special School District
  oFrozen Boundaries
  oIndependent Taxing Authority
  oVeto Power Over Merger with Other School Systems

To Create a Special School District:
  oLift Statewide Ban
  oLegislative Creation of New Special School District
Why Change the Status Quo?: 
     Interests of the Two Districts



 Continued Local     Sustainability in
  Control              Funding
Strategy: Surrender of 
                       MCS Charter

Motivating Force: Funding Uncertainties
  oCity Contribution
  oCounty Contribution if SCS becomes Special School
  District

Meaning and Effect of Charter Surrender

To Dissolve Memphis City Schools Charter:
  oSchool Board Surrender of Charter
  oCitywide Referendum
Step One: MCS Board Votes to 
    Surrender Charter (Dec. 20, 2010)




Next Step: Citywide Referendum
What If…..the referendum succeeds?

Impact on Funding:
    Single-Source Local Funding – Shelby County Gov’t

Impact on Governance: Merged District
    Short-Term Uncertainty
    Long-Term = Reconstituted County-wide Board

Impact on Students:
    Transition Period to Hammer Out Details (for
     example, uniforms, staffing, textbooks, etc.)
    New Board to Make Long-Term Decisions on student
     assignment, academic programs
What If…..the referendum
           does not succeed?

Maintenance of Status Quo in funding and governance

Shelby County Schools free to continue pursuit of Special
School District status in state legislature

Memphis City Schools free to consider other agreements
to ensure sustainable funding
Current Sub‐Issues

Continued Negotiation Between the Districts
  oMCS Rejection of SCS Proposed Agreement

Legislation that Could Change Current Landscape
  oState Legislature
  oMemphis City Council

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a Kiel stand presentation slides

Semelhante a Kiel stand presentation slides (9)

School mergerpowerpointfeb2011c
School mergerpowerpointfeb2011cSchool mergerpowerpointfeb2011c
School mergerpowerpointfeb2011c
 
2018 MICAH Public Meeting Program
2018 MICAH Public Meeting Program2018 MICAH Public Meeting Program
2018 MICAH Public Meeting Program
 
MICAH Public Meeting 2019 - Breaking Through
MICAH Public Meeting 2019 - Breaking ThroughMICAH Public Meeting 2019 - Breaking Through
MICAH Public Meeting 2019 - Breaking Through
 
Charter Commission Draft Charter
Charter Commission Draft CharterCharter Commission Draft Charter
Charter Commission Draft Charter
 
Charter commission charterpresent
Charter commission charterpresentCharter commission charterpresent
Charter commission charterpresent
 
Dutchess County Executive race forum questions
Dutchess County Executive race forum questionsDutchess County Executive race forum questions
Dutchess County Executive race forum questions
 
32910
3291032910
32910
 
32910 Budget
32910 Budget32910 Budget
32910 Budget
 
SB36
SB36SB36
SB36
 

Mais de lcmsturgis

Revised tn one pager 1 8 11
Revised tn one pager 1 8 11Revised tn one pager 1 8 11
Revised tn one pager 1 8 11lcmsturgis
 
Graduationrates
GraduationratesGraduationrates
Graduationrateslcmsturgis
 
Consolidation study 1
Consolidation study 1Consolidation study 1
Consolidation study 1lcmsturgis
 
Impact of consolidation
Impact of consolidationImpact of consolidation
Impact of consolidationlcmsturgis
 
Letter to-goins-in-response-to-his-questions-about-referendum
Letter to-goins-in-response-to-his-questions-about-referendumLetter to-goins-in-response-to-his-questions-about-referendum
Letter to-goins-in-response-to-his-questions-about-referendumlcmsturgis
 
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02lcmsturgis
 
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02lcmsturgis
 
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02lcmsturgis
 
Impact%20 spec%20school%20districtlr
Impact%20 spec%20school%20districtlrImpact%20 spec%20school%20districtlr
Impact%20 spec%20school%20districtlrlcmsturgis
 
Countyschooldistricts
CountyschooldistrictsCountyschooldistricts
Countyschooldistrictslcmsturgis
 

Mais de lcmsturgis (13)

Surrenderres
SurrenderresSurrenderres
Surrenderres
 
Revised tn one pager 1 8 11
Revised tn one pager 1 8 11Revised tn one pager 1 8 11
Revised tn one pager 1 8 11
 
Sb0025
Sb0025Sb0025
Sb0025
 
Graduationrates
GraduationratesGraduationrates
Graduationrates
 
Consolidation study 1
Consolidation study 1Consolidation study 1
Consolidation study 1
 
Impact of consolidation
Impact of consolidationImpact of consolidation
Impact of consolidation
 
Letter to-goins-in-response-to-his-questions-about-referendum
Letter to-goins-in-response-to-his-questions-about-referendumLetter to-goins-in-response-to-his-questions-about-referendum
Letter to-goins-in-response-to-his-questions-about-referendum
 
Norris
NorrisNorris
Norris
 
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
 
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
 
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
Wsrc hlm district size final 10 2-02
 
Impact%20 spec%20school%20districtlr
Impact%20 spec%20school%20districtlrImpact%20 spec%20school%20districtlr
Impact%20 spec%20school%20districtlr
 
Countyschooldistricts
CountyschooldistrictsCountyschooldistricts
Countyschooldistricts
 

Kiel stand presentation slides

  • 1. Community Information Meeting: The Future of Public Education in Shelby County January 19, 2011 Daniel Kiel The University of Memphis School of Law
  • 2. Shelby County Comparison: Government vs. Schools Shelby County  Shelby County Schools Government  Serves ENTIRETY of   Serves only the portion of  Shelby County (including  Shelby County outside of  Memphians and non‐ the Memphis city limits Memphians)
  • 3.
  • 4. Individual 1: The Memphian Votes for Member of PATH OF PROPERTY TAXES Memphis City School Board City of Memphis Taxpayer Children Assigned to Attend Memphis City City of Memphis  Shelby County  Schools Government Government
  • 5. Individual 2: The Non‐Memphian PATH OF PROPERTY TAXES Votes for Members of Taxpayer Outside Memphis Shelby County School Board Shelby County  Children Assigned to Government Attend Shelby County Schools
  • 6. Funding Sources Source (103,593 students) (47,342 students) State of Tennessee $428M $174M (49.5%) (50.7%) Shelby County Property Taxes $255M $115M (paid by all county residents – Memphian and non‐Memphian) (29.5%) (33.5%) Shelby County Sales Taxes $89M $43M (10.3%) (12.6%) City of Memphis Property Taxes  $84M N/A (paid only by Memphians) (9.8%) Other $8M $10M (1.0%) (3.0%)
  • 7. Why Change the Status Quo?:  Interests of the Two Districts  Continued Local  Sustainability in Control Funding
  • 8. Strategy: SCS Conversion to  Special School District Currently: SCS is a “County” District Changes if SCS Converted to Special School District oFrozen Boundaries oIndependent Taxing Authority oVeto Power Over Merger with Other School Systems To Create a Special School District: oLift Statewide Ban oLegislative Creation of New Special School District
  • 9. Why Change the Status Quo?:  Interests of the Two Districts  Continued Local  Sustainability in Control Funding
  • 10. Strategy: Surrender of  MCS Charter Motivating Force: Funding Uncertainties oCity Contribution oCounty Contribution if SCS becomes Special School District Meaning and Effect of Charter Surrender To Dissolve Memphis City Schools Charter: oSchool Board Surrender of Charter oCitywide Referendum
  • 11. Step One: MCS Board Votes to  Surrender Charter (Dec. 20, 2010) Next Step: Citywide Referendum
  • 12. What If…..the referendum succeeds? Impact on Funding:  Single-Source Local Funding – Shelby County Gov’t Impact on Governance: Merged District  Short-Term Uncertainty  Long-Term = Reconstituted County-wide Board Impact on Students:  Transition Period to Hammer Out Details (for example, uniforms, staffing, textbooks, etc.)  New Board to Make Long-Term Decisions on student assignment, academic programs
  • 13. What If…..the referendum does not succeed? Maintenance of Status Quo in funding and governance Shelby County Schools free to continue pursuit of Special School District status in state legislature Memphis City Schools free to consider other agreements to ensure sustainable funding
  • 14. Current Sub‐Issues Continued Negotiation Between the Districts oMCS Rejection of SCS Proposed Agreement Legislation that Could Change Current Landscape oState Legislature oMemphis City Council