8. Received Signal Code Power (RSCP)
• Received power on one code measured on
the Common Pilot Channel (CPICH)
• A downlink measurement, carried out by the
UE
• Can be obtained in idle mode and active
mode
9. Received Signal Strength (RSS)
• The received wide band power, including
thermal noise and noise generated in the
receiver
• RSSI describes the downlink interference
level at the UE side
• Measurable by the UE
• Can be measured in active mode only
10. SFN-SFN observed time difference
• Time Difference of System Frame Numbers
(SFN) between Two cells
TCPICHRxj – TCPICHRxi
TCPICHRxj - Time when the UE receives one Primary CPICH slot
from cell j
TCPICHRxi - Time when the UE receives the Primary CPICH slot
from cell i that is closest in time to TCPICHRxj
• Measured in idle mode or active mode by the UE
11. Round Trip Time (RTT)
• Corresponds to the Timing Advance Parameter in GSM
RTT = TRX – TTX
TTX - Time of transmission of the beginning of a downlink DPCH frame to a UE
TRX - Time of reception of the beginning (the first detected path, in time) of the
corresponding uplink DPCCH frame from the UE
• Measurements are possible on Downlink DPCH
transmitted from NodeB and Uplink DPDCH received in
the same NodeB
• Measured in active mode only
12. Angle of Arrival (AoA)
• Arrival angle of the signals from the mobile station at
several NodeBs
• Special antenna arrays should be equipped at the
NodeBs
NodeB with directional
antenna
15. Cell ID Based Method
• Simplest method
• MS position is estimated with the knowledge of serving
NodeB
• Position can be indicated as:
• Cell Identity of the serving cell
• Service Area Identity
• Location co-ordinates the serving cell
• Accuracy of the estimation depends on the coverage
area of the cells
16. Enhancements to Cell ID
• Wide range of enhancements for the Cell ID
based method
– Cell ID + RTT (Round Trip Time)
– Cell ID + Reference Signal Power Budget
– Cell ID + RSCP (Received Signal Code
Power)
17. Cell ID + RTT (Round Trip Time)
• Identical to Cell ID+TA (Timing Advance) method in
GSM
• Accuracy of RTT measurements in UMTS is significantly
higher (36m)
• RTT is used to calculate the distance from the NodeB to
MS using propagation models
• Performance can be enhanced by incorporating the RTT
measurements from all Node Bs in the Active Set
• Accurate RTT measurements through Forced Hand Over
(FHO)
18. Cell ID + RTT (Round Trip Time)
Location Estimation:
• Constrained least-square (LS) optimization for estimating
the position (by Jakub Borkowski & Jukka Lempiainen)
– Assume an initial position (Geographical mean of hearable
NodeBs)
– Minimize the function F(x)
−1
N
1 N
F ( x ) = ∑f i ( x ) − P ∑
2
i=1 i=
1 gi ( x)
g i ( x) = − f i ( x)
f i ( x ) = d i − ( xi − x ) 2 +( yi − y ) 2 ≥ 0
x = co lumn matrix co nsisting the co o rdinate s o f the M (x, y).
S
P = APo sitive Scalar
19. Cell ID + RTT (Round Trip Time)
Location Estimation:
- Location estimation is done according to the following
recursion
xk +1 = xk − µ∇ x F ( xk )
- Continue until the following condition is fulfilled, for a
defined threshold
∇ x F ( xk ) ≤ t
20. Cell ID + RTT (Round Trip Time)
• Some simulation results for urban & suburban
areas (by Jakub Borkowski & Jukka Lempiainen)
Topology Urban Suburban
67% 95% 67% 95%
6-sector / 650 75 m 200 m 50 m 150 m
6-sector / 330 60 m 220 m 55m 170 m
21. Cell ID + Reference Signal Power Budget (RSPB)
•Coverage area of a cell can be determined by using
RSPB
• RSPB gives information about
- Node B transmitted power
- Isotropic path loss
- Coverage threshold at coverage area border for a
given location probability
- Cell radius for indoor and outdoor coverage
• SRNC may compare the received power levels with the
power budget to accurately position the UE
22. OTDOA method with Enhancements
Standard OTDOA Method
• Relative timing offset of the CPICH associated with
different Node Bs are used
• Each OTDOA measurement describes a line of constant
difference (a hyperbola) along which the MS may be
located
• MS's position is
determined by the
intersection of hyperbolas for
at least three pairs of Node
Bs
Source:
[3] 3GPP TS 25.215:
23. Standard OTDOA method
Features
• The accuracy depends on the precision of the timing
measurements
• Timing synchronizations of different NodeBs is essential
• Best results are when the Node Bs equally around the MS
Drawbacks
• Hearability Problem Serving NodeB drowns the signals
from distant NodeBs
Solution
• Get the assistance of secondary services
OTDOA method with Enhancements
24. OTDOA method with Enhancements
Use of Idle Periods in Down Link (IPDL)
• In UMTS NodeB transmissions are synchronously
ceased for a short period of time - Idle Period
• Terminal can measure neighbor NodeBs during Idle
Periods
• Maximizes the hearability of distant pilots
• Two techniques
– Standard IPDL
– Time Aligned IPDL (TA-IPDL)
25. OTDOA method with Enhancements
Use of Idle Periods in Down Link (IPDL)
Standard IPDL - Pseudo random idle slots
Time Aligned IPDL (TA_IPDL) - Time Aligned Idle Slots
Source: [10] 3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 doc
26. OTDOA method with Enhancements
Time Aligned IPDL (TA-IPDL) Method
• During the ‘common’ idle period each node B transmits a
signal ONLY useful for location estimation, randomly,
pseudo-randomly or periodically
• OTDOA of these common pilots is measured in the MS for
different Node Bs
• Positioning is done as in the standard OTDOA algorithm
• Drawbacks
- added complexity to the network operation
- reduced communication efficiency
27. Time Aligned IPDL (TA-IPDL) Method
- Simulation Results (TSG-RAN Working Group 1)
Area 67 % error 90 % rms error
Rural 8m 6m
Sub urban 6m 5m
Urban-B 44 m 39 m
Urban -A 95 m 83 m
Bad Urban 218 m 193 m
28. OTDOA method with Enhancements
Use of Cumulative Virtual blanking (CVB)
• Uses virtual blanking of
the Node B downlink
signals in the software
domain based on the
principles of interference
cancellation
• Significantly enhances
hearability than in IPDL,
using signal processing
techniques Source:
[12] http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/TSG_RAN/RP-020372.pdf
29. Use of Cumulative Virtual blanking (CVB)
• Downlink signal are measured simultaneously at the handset
and at Node Bs
• Handset – Received signal snapshots
• NodeB - Time co-incident snapshots of the transmitted
signals
• Measurements are transferred to the location server
• Location server extracts the OTD of weaker NodeBs’ signals
by attenuating the interfering signals one by one
• Multiple Node B signals are blanked allowing weaker ones to
be measured
• Positioning is done using standard OTDOA algorithm
30. Use of Cumulative Virtual blanking (CVB)
Features
• No impact on downlink capacity
• Median number of hearable Node Bs for CVB is
roughly double that for IPDL
• Much more robust in the presence of multipath
• Operational complexity is reduced compared with
IPDL
31. Use of Cumulative Virtual blanking (CVB)
Some preliminary results obtained through trials in
several sites of a UMTS network (TSG-RAN Group)
Site Time Error
1 16:26 22.8 m
2 16:43 27.6 m
3 17:11 16.9 m
4 17:13 5.7 m
5 17:16 26.2 m
32. Database Correlation Method (DCM)
• Based on a pre-measured database of
location dependent variable
• DCM in UMTS utilizes Power Delay Profile
(PDP) of locations (GSM used RSSI)
• An entry of the database consists of:
– location coordinates (Lat, Lon)
– serving Node ID
– Power delay profile from that Node
33. Database Correlation Method (DCM)
• In location estimation PDP from the serving NodeB is
correlated with the PDPs stored in the database
• The point with the highest correlation coefficient is chosen
as the location estimate
• RTT measurement
from same NodeB is
used to limit the
number of correlation
points
Source: [8]. “Database correlation method for UMTS location”
34. Database Correlation Method (DCM)
• Advantages
– Avoids problems related to Multipath Propagation
• Drawbacks
– Delay Profile Measurements are not standardized in
3GPP, thus requiring software changes at the MS
– Reporting of such measurements to the location
server in the network is also not standardized
– Higher cost in creating database
35. Database Correlation Method (DCM)
• Some simulation results in urban UMTS network in
comparison with OTDOA method
-(by Suvi Ahonen & Heikiki Laitinen)
67 % 95%
DCM 25 m 140 m
OTDOA 97 m 620 m
36. Pilot Correlation Method
• Based on a database with pre-measured samples of
Received Signal Code Power (RSCP) Measurements of
visible Pilots
• Database Preparation
– Area is divided into small regions (positioning
regions)
– Size of the region depends on the desired accuracy
– For each positioning region, the most probable
Common Pilot Channels’ RSCP measurements are
stored.
37. Pilot Correlation Method
Database Preparation
• An entry of the database contains:
– The positioning region
– Visible Common Pilot Channels
– RSCP of each pilot
• Can be created automatically from log files of
the measurement tool
38. Pilot Correlation Method
Location Estimation
• Measured RSCP of visible pilots are compared with all
samples stored in the database
• Least Square Method is applied for comparison
S LMS = ∑ ( Si − mi ) 2 = ∑ ∆ i
i∈ N i∈ N
Si – Value of the ith field of the stored sample
mi – Value of the ith field of the measurement
N - Number of fields in the vector
• Estimated location coordinates of the middle
point of the position region having smallest S LMS
39. Pilot Correlation Method
Advantages
• An entirely network-based approach and doesn’t require
any hardware or software modifications in the MS
• Deployment costs are minimized by the use of
standardized measurements and procedures
• Since the database can be created automatically using
the log files of the measurement tool, no additional effort
is needed in database formation
40. Pilot Correlation Method
• Some results obtained in real network conditions in an
urban UMTS network in Finland….
T Route
est 67 % 95 %
Route -1 70 m 130 m
Route -2 90 m 195 m
Route -3 90 m 180 m
- By Jakub Borkowski & Jukka Lempiainen
41. Other Positioning Techniques
• Positioning Element OTDOA method
• Angle of Arrival Method
• Uplink Time Difference of Arrival Method
42. Summary
• 3G Mobile Networks
• Positioning Parameters in 3G Networks
• Positioning Techniques
– Enhancements to Cell ID based methods
– Time based methods
• OTDOA methods and enhancements
– Database Correlation method
– Pilot Correlation method
43. References
[1] http://www.three-g.net/3g_standards.html (accessed on 15.05.2007
10.30 a.m)
[2] Sumit Kasera, Nishit Narang, “3G Networks Architecture, Protocols and
Procedures”, Tata McGraw-Hill Professional Networking Series.
[3] 3GPP TS 25.215: Universal Mobile Telecommunications System
(UMTS); Physical layer; Measurements (FDD), version 7.1.0 Release 7.
[4] WCDMA RNP and RNO Training material, Part I and Part II, Huawei
Technologies Company limited.
[5] 3GPP TS 25.305, “UMTS; UE positioning in Universal Terrestrial Radio
Access Network (UTRAN); Stage 2,” ver. 7.1.0, Rel. 7,
http://www.3gpp.org.
[6] Jakub Borkowski , Jukka Lempi¨ainen, “Practical Network-Based
Techniques for Mobile Positioning in UMTS”, Institute of Communications
Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Finland.
44. References
[7] J. Borkowski, J. Niemel¨a, and J. Lempi¨ainen, “Performance of Cell
ID+RTT hybrid positioning method for UMTS radio networks,” in
Proceedings of the 5th European Wireless Conference, pp. 487–492,
Barcelona, Spain, February 2004.
[8] S. Ahonen and H. Laitinen, “Database correlation method for UMTS
location,” in Proceedings of the 57th IEEE Vehicular Technology
Conference, vol. 4, pp. 2696–2700, Jeju, South Korea, April 2003.
[9] J. Borkowski and J. Lempi¨ainen, “Pilot correlation method for urban
UMTS networks,” in Proceedings of the 11th European Wireless
Conference, vol. 2, pp. 465–469, Nicosia, Cyprus, April 2005.
[10] 3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 doc. No R1-99b79, “Time Aligned IP-DL
positioning technique,” 1999, http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/ tsg ran/WG1
RL1/TSGR1 07/Docs/Pdfs/R1-99b79.pdf.
[11] 3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 doc. No R1-00-1186, “Initial Simulation
Results of the OTDOA-PE positioning method,” 2000,
http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg ran/WG1 RL1/TSGR1 16/Docs/ PDFs/R1-00-11
.
45. References
[12] 3GPP TSG-RAN Meeting No. 16, TSG RP-020372, “Software
blanking for OTDOA positioning”, June 2002, Marco Island, Florida,
USA,
[13] P. J. Duffett-Smith, M. D. Macnaughtan, “Precise UE Positioning in
UMTS Using Cumulative Virtual Blanking,”, 3G Mobile Communication
Technologies, May 2002, Conference Publication No.489.
[14] Lames J, Caffery Jr, Gordon L.Stuber, Georgia lnstitute of
Technology, “Overview of Radiolocation in CDMA Cellular Systems”,
IEEE Communications Magazine, April 1998.
[15] Jakub Borkowski, Jarno Niemelia, Jukka Lempiainen, “ Location
Techniques for UMTS Radio Netwroks”, Presentation of Reasearch
Activities, Institute of Coommunications Engineering, Tampere
university of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
[16] Jakub Borkowski , Jukka Lempiäinen, “Novel mobile-based location
techniques for UMTS”, Institute of Communications Engineering,
Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.