SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 319
Why Believe in Miracles?
   ©   Dr. Ken Boa and Bill Ibsen 2007. All Rights Reserved.


                                                               1
Why Believe in Miracles?




                           2
Why Believe in Miracles?

  How can a rational person today accept the
  stories of miracles in the Bible?




                                               2
Why Believe in Miracles?

  How can a rational person today accept the
  stories of miracles in the Bible?

  Aren't miracles contrary to the laws of
  modern science?




                                               2
Why Believe in Miracles?

  How can a rational person today accept the
  stories of miracles in the Bible?

  Aren't miracles contrary to the laws of
  modern science?

  There is no historical basis for the miracles in
  the Bible — aren't they simply myths and
  legends designed to create religious faith?




                                                     2
Why Believe in Miracles?

  How can a rational person today accept the
  stories of miracles in the Bible?

  Aren't miracles contrary to the laws of
  modern science?

  There is no historical basis for the miracles in
  the Bible — aren't they simply myths and
  legends designed to create religious faith?

  If there were miracles then, why doesn’t God
  perform miracles today?


                                                     2
Why Believe in Miracles?




                           3
Why Believe in Miracles?
  Option I: Miracles Are Not Possible




                                        3
Why Believe in Miracles?
  Option I: Miracles Are Not Possible

  Option II: Miracles Are Possible But May Not Have Occurred




                                                               3
Why Believe in Miracles?
  Option I: Miracles Are Not Possible

  Option II: Miracles Are Possible But May Not Have Occurred

  Option III: Miracles Have Occurred




                                                               3
Why Believe in Miracles?
  Option I: Miracles Are Not Possible

  Option II: Miracles Are Possible But May Not Have Occurred

  Option III: Miracles Have Occurred

  Appendix: The Resurrection




                                                               3
Three Options
         Have Miracles Occurred?




                                   4
Three Options
         Have Miracles Occurred?




   No




                                   4
Three Options
         Have Miracles Occurred?




   No            Maybe




                                   4
Three Options
         Have Miracles Occurred?




   No            Maybe             Yes




                                         4
Miracles: A Uniqueness of
Christianity




  Hindu Temple   Buddhist Temple   Egyptian Mosque

                                                     5
Miracles: A Uniqueness of
Christianity
   Christian teachings are built directly upon God's miraculous acts




  Hindu Temple           Buddhist Temple          Egyptian Mosque

                                                                       5
Miracles: A Uniqueness of
Christianity
   Christian teachings are built directly upon God's miraculous acts

   Very few accounts of miracles exist in other religions




  Hindu Temple            Buddhist Temple          Egyptian Mosque

                                                                       5
Miracles: A Uniqueness of
Christianity
   Christian teachings are built directly upon God's miraculous acts

   Very few accounts of miracles exist in other religions

   Christianity stands or falls with the historicity of miracles




  Hindu Temple             Buddhist Temple            Egyptian Mosque

                                                                        5
Option I:
Miracles Are Not Possible
                             6
Philosophy of Naturalism




                           7
Philosophy of Naturalism


  The universe operates
  according to uniform natural
  causes




                                 7
Philosophy of Naturalism


  The universe operates
  according to uniform natural
  causes

   Closed system




                                 7
Philosophy of Naturalism


  The universe operates
  according to uniform natural
  causes

   Closed system

   Anti-supernatural assumption




                                  7
Hume’s Denial of Miracles




                     David Hume (1711-1776)




                                              8
Hume’s Denial of Miracles
  Held that no amount of
  evidence can establish that a
  miracle has occurred




                                  David Hume (1711-1776)




                                                           8
Hume’s Denial of Miracles
  Held that no amount of
  evidence can establish that a
  miracle has occurred

   The uniformity of natural law is
   supported by the uniform
   experience of men against the
   occurrence of miracles




                                      David Hume (1711-1776)




                                                               8
Hume’s Denial of Miracles
  Held that no amount of
  evidence can establish that a
  miracle has occurred

   The uniformity of natural law is
   supported by the uniform
   experience of men against the
   occurrence of miracles

  Documented reports of miracles



                                      David Hume (1711-1776)




                                                               8
Hume’s Denial of Miracles
  Held that no amount of
  evidence can establish that a
  miracle has occurred

   The uniformity of natural law is
   supported by the uniform
   experience of men against the
   occurrence of miracles

  Documented reports of miracles

  Circular reasoning
                                      David Hume (1711-1776)




                                                               8
Hume’s Denial of Miracles
  Held that no amount of
  evidence can establish that a
  miracle has occurred

   The uniformity of natural law is
   supported by the uniform
   experience of men against the
   occurrence of miracles

  Documented reports of miracles

  Circular reasoning

  Pre-determining the verdict         David Hume (1711-1776)




                                                               8
The Anti-Supernatural Assumption




                                   9
The Anti-Supernatural Assumption
             A presupposition that God either does not
             exist or cannot directly intrude into the
             historical process




                                                         9
The Anti-Supernatural Assumption
             A presupposition that God either does not
             exist or cannot directly intrude into the
             historical process

              A metaphysical (philosophic), not scientific
              position




                                                            9
The Anti-Supernatural Assumption
             A presupposition that God either does not
             exist or cannot directly intrude into the
             historical process

              A metaphysical (philosophic), not scientific
              position

             Science is limited in its scope to the study of
             natural phenomena, especially that which is
             repeatable




                                                               9
The Anti-Supernatural Assumption
             A presupposition that God either does not
             exist or cannot directly intrude into the
             historical process

              A metaphysical (philosophic), not scientific
              position

             Science is limited in its scope to the study of
             natural phenomena, especially that which is
             repeatable

             Degeneration of science into scientism



                                                               9
The Anti-Supernatural Assumption
             A presupposition that God either does not
             exist or cannot directly intrude into the
             historical process

              A metaphysical (philosophic), not scientific
              position

             Science is limited in its scope to the study of
             natural phenomena, especially that which is
             repeatable

             Degeneration of science into scientism

             Science is descriptive, not prescriptive

                                                               9
The Nature of Miracles




                         10
The Nature of Miracles
  Empowered by something higher than nature




                                              10
The Nature of Miracles
  Empowered by something higher than nature

  Supersede the ordinary processes or laws of nature




                                                       10
The Nature of Miracles
  Empowered by something higher than nature

  Supersede the ordinary processes or laws of nature

  A higher principle overcomes a lower principle




                                                       10
The Nature of Miracles
  Empowered by something higher than nature

  Supersede the ordinary processes or laws of nature

  A higher principle overcomes a lower principle




                   Force of
                    Gravity




                                                       10
The Nature of Miracles
  Empowered by something higher than nature

  Supersede the ordinary processes or laws of nature

  A higher principle overcomes a lower principle




                   Force of
                    Gravity

                                    Force of
                                  Aerodynamics


                                                       10
Stunt planes close hover


                           11
To claim that miracles violate or contradict natural laws




                              Stunt planes close hover


                                                            11
To claim that miracles violate or contradict natural laws
is just as improper as to say that
the principle of aerodynamics violates the law of gravity.




                              Stunt planes close hover


                                                             11
Miracles and the Supernatural




                                12
Miracles and the Supernatural
  Miracles are accomplished
  by a supernatural agency




                                12
Miracles and the Supernatural
  Miracles are accomplished
  by a supernatural agency

   No natural explanation for
   how they happen




                                12
Miracles and the Supernatural
  Miracles are accomplished
  by a supernatural agency

   No natural explanation for
   how they happen

   Our inability to explain them
   certainly does not mean,
   therefore, that they cannot
   occur




                                   12
Miracles and the Supernatural
  Miracles are accomplished
  by a supernatural agency

   No natural explanation for
   how they happen

   Our inability to explain them
   certainly does not mean,
   therefore, that they cannot
   occur

   Inexplainable non-miraculous
   phenomena exist


                                   12
Miracles and the Supernatural
  Miracles are accomplished
  by a supernatural agency

   No natural explanation for
   how they happen

   Our inability to explain them
   certainly does not mean,
   therefore, that they cannot
   occur

   Inexplainable non-miraculous         Total
   phenomena exist                 Liquefaction in
                                   Metamorphosis

                                                     12
Another Scientific Objection




                              13
Another Scientific Objection
            “Miracles destroy the regularity of nature”




                                                          13
Another Scientific Objection
            “Miracles destroy the regularity of nature”

             Misunderstanding of the biblical teaching on
             miracles




                                                            13
Another Scientific Objection
            “Miracles destroy the regularity of nature”

             Misunderstanding of the biblical teaching on
             miracles

            God has instituted “laws of nature” but is not
            bound by them




                                                             13
Another Scientific Objection
            “Miracles destroy the regularity of nature”

             Misunderstanding of the biblical teaching on
             miracles

            God has instituted “laws of nature” but is not
            bound by them

            These sovereign interventions or miracles are
            unusual, not commonplace events




                                                             13
Another Scientific Objection
            “Miracles destroy the regularity of nature”

             Misunderstanding of the biblical teaching on
             miracles

            God has instituted “laws of nature” but is not
            bound by them

            These sovereign interventions or miracles are
            unusual, not commonplace events

             Miracles by definition must be unique and
             extraordinary




                                                             13
Scientific inquiry is not threatened by the occurrence of miracles,




                                                                     14
Scientific inquiry is not threatened by the occurrence of miracles,




because they are by definition unusual events




                                                                            14
Scientific inquiry is not threatened by the occurrence of miracles,




because they are by definition unusual events


                                      that involve a very brief suspension
                                      of the normal processes of nature




                                                                             14
Scientific inquiry is not threatened by the occurrence of miracles,




because they are by definition unusual events


                                      that involve a very brief suspension
                                      of the normal processes of nature




                                                        by a higher power


                                                                             14
Nature Is Amazing, But Not Miraculous




                                        15
Nature Is Amazing, But Not Miraculous
                       God’s handiwork in nature is
                       mysterious and wonderful,
                       but not miraculous




                                                      15
Nature Is Amazing, But Not Miraculous
                       God’s handiwork in nature is
                       mysterious and wonderful,
                       but not miraculous

                        Dilution of the concept of
                        miracles




                                                      15
Nature Is Amazing, But Not Miraculous
                       God’s handiwork in nature is
                       mysterious and wonderful,
                       but not miraculous

                        Dilution of the concept of
                        miracles

                       Miracle: a phenomenon that
                       occurs in space-time history
                       that is so radically different
                       from the ordinary operations
                       of nature that its observers
                       are justified in attributing it to
                       the direct intervention of a
                       supernatural agent

                                                           15
Brief Time Clusters of Miracles




                                  16
Brief Time Clusters of Miracles


  Moses
   and
  Joshua




                                  16
Brief Time Clusters of Miracles


  Moses       Elijah
   and         and
  Joshua      Elisha




                                  16
Brief Time Clusters of Miracles


  Moses       Elijah        Christ
   and         and         and the
  Joshua      Elisha       Apostles




                                      16
Brief Time Clusters of Miracles


  Moses       Elijah        Christ
   and         and         and the
  Joshua      Elisha       Apostles


   LAW




                                      16
Brief Time Clusters of Miracles


  Moses       Elijah        Christ
   and         and         and the
  Joshua      Elisha       Apostles


   LAW       PROPHETS




                                      16
Brief Time Clusters of Miracles


  Moses       Elijah        Christ
   and         and         and the
  Joshua      Elisha       Apostles

                              NEW
   LAW       PROPHETS      TESTAMENT




                                       16
Brief Time Clusters of Miracles


  Moses              Elijah     Christ
   and                and      and the
  Joshua             Elisha    Apostles
           c. 540
           years                  NEW
   LAW              PROPHETS   TESTAMENT




                                           16
Brief Time Clusters of Miracles


  Moses              Elijah              Christ
   and                and               and the
  Joshua             Elisha             Apostles
           c. 540              c. 830
           years               years       NEW
   LAW              PROPHETS            TESTAMENT




                                                    16
Brief Time Clusters of Miracles


  Moses               Elijah                        Christ
   and                 and                         and the
  Joshua              Elisha                       Apostles
           c. 540                    c. 830
           years                     years           NEW
   LAW               PROPHETS                     TESTAMENT

              The Bible is not a record of one miracle after another;
                          its miracles were profound singular events

                                                                    16
Objections




             17
Objections


     Philosophical




                     17
Objections
                     Scientific




     Philosophical




                                 17
Objections
                     Scientific




     Philosophical




                                          Exi st?
                                   G od
                           Do es

                                                    17
The Idea of Miracles Is Relative,
Not Absolute




                                    18
The Idea of Miracles Is Relative,
Not Absolute
  To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and
  omniscience




                                                                 18
The Idea of Miracles Is Relative,
Not Absolute
  To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and
  omniscience

  There is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised




                                                                  18
The Idea of Miracles Is Relative,
Not Absolute
  To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and
  omniscience

  There is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised




                   Edwin Abbott’s story
                   Flatland ,1884

                                                                  18
The Idea of Miracles Is Relative,
Not Absolute
  To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and
  omniscience

  There is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised




                                A. Square


                   Edwin Abbott’s story
                   Flatland ,1884

                                                                  18
The Idea of Miracles Is Relative,
Not Absolute
  To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and
  omniscience

  There is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised




                                A. Square


                   Edwin Abbott’s story
                   Flatland ,1884

                                                                  18
The Idea of Miracles Is Relative,
Not Absolute
  To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and
  omniscience

  There is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised




                                A. Square


                   Edwin Abbott’s story
                   Flatland ,1884

                                                                  18
The Idea of Miracles Is Relative,
Not Absolute
  To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and
  omniscience

  There is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised




                                A. Square


                   Edwin Abbott’s story
                   Flatland ,1884

                                                                  18
Key Issue: Does God Exist?




                             19
Key Issue: Does God Exist?

 If God created the universe, there is a supernatural dimension
 to reality, and this means that miracles are possible




                                                                  19
Key Issue: Does God Exist?

 If God created the universe, there is a supernatural dimension
 to reality, and this means that miracles are possible

 Now the question is not one of philosophy but of history




                                                                  19
Key Issue: Does God Exist?

 If God created the universe, there is a supernatural dimension
 to reality, and this means that miracles are possible

 Now the question is not one of philosophy but of history

  Miracles are possible, but is there enough evidence to show that
  any have happened?




                                                                     19
Option II:
Miracles Are Possible But May Not Have Occurred
                                                20
Has God Miraculously Intervened
in Human Affairs?




                  Luke 24:1, The Book of Kells, c.A.D. 800

                                                             21
Has God Miraculously Intervened
in Human Affairs?
 Speculation will never settle
 the question; must use
 historical evidence




                                 Luke 24:1, The Book of Kells, c.A.D. 800

                                                                            21
Has God Miraculously Intervened
in Human Affairs?
 Speculation will never settle
 the question; must use
 historical evidence

 God used history as His
 means of revealing His
 character and redemptive
 program




                                 Luke 24:1, The Book of Kells, c.A.D. 800

                                                                            21
Has God Miraculously Intervened
in Human Affairs?
 Speculation will never settle
 the question; must use
 historical evidence

 God used history as His
 means of revealing His
 character and redemptive
 program

 Abundant geographic and
 chronological documentation
 ties God's revelation to the real
 world                               Luke 24:1, The Book of Kells, c.A.D. 800

                                                                                21
The Reliability of the Bible




                       Lindisfarne Gospel of Matthew,
                                   7-8th C

                                                        22
The Reliability of the Bible
  Not a fabric of myths or fairy
  tales




                                   Lindisfarne Gospel of Matthew,
                                               7-8th C

                                                                    22
The Reliability of the Bible
  Not a fabric of myths or fairy
  tales

  Dates and locations of events,
  often relating them to the
  affairs of other nations




                                   Lindisfarne Gospel of Matthew,
                                               7-8th C

                                                                    22
The Reliability of the Bible
  Not a fabric of myths or fairy
  tales

  Dates and locations of events,
  often relating them to the
  affairs of other nations

  Miracles recorded with same
  attention as nonmiraculous
  events


                                   Lindisfarne Gospel of Matthew,
                                               7-8th C

                                                                    22
The Reliability of the Bible
  Not a fabric of myths or fairy
  tales

  Dates and locations of events,
  often relating them to the
  affairs of other nations

  Miracles recorded with same
  attention as nonmiraculous
  events

  Unlike scriptures of other
  religions                        Lindisfarne Gospel of Matthew,
                                               7-8th C

                                                                    22
Key Point




Luke 3:22-26, The Book of Kells, c.A.D. 800


                                              23
Key Point
                                              The miracles of Christ can be subjected
                                                       to historical scrutiny




Luke 3:22-26, The Book of Kells, c.A.D. 800


                                                                                        23
Key Point
                                              The miracles of Christ can be subjected
                                                       to historical scrutiny




                                                    because of the reliability of
                                                  the New Testament documents
Luke 3:22-26, The Book of Kells, c.A.D. 800


                                                                                        23
Miracles: Beneath God’s Dignity?




The Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes,
     Lambert Lombard, c. 1550

                                        24
Miracles: Beneath God’s Dignity?
                                        The sovereign God who
                                        created nature uses nature to
                                        manifest Himself to humanity




The Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes,
     Lambert Lombard, c. 1550

                                                                        24
Miracles: Beneath God’s Dignity?
                                        The sovereign God who
                                        created nature uses nature to
                                        manifest Himself to humanity

                                        God’s personal revelation in
                                        Jesus Christ




The Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes,
     Lambert Lombard, c. 1550

                                                                        24
Miracles: Beneath God’s Dignity?
                                        The sovereign God who
                                        created nature uses nature to
                                        manifest Himself to humanity

                                        God’s personal revelation in
                                        Jesus Christ

                                         Accomplished more miracles
                                         than any other man



The Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes,
     Lambert Lombard, c. 1550

                                                                        24
Special Revelation




     The Marriage at Cana,
David Girard, c.1500, The Louvre


                                   25
Special Revelation
                                   General revelation (natural
                                   theology) is too limited and
                                   too speculative




     The Marriage at Cana,
David Girard, c.1500, The Louvre


                                                                  25
Special Revelation
                                   General revelation (natural
                                   theology) is too limited and
                                   too speculative

                                   Special revelation includes
                                   miraculous events




     The Marriage at Cana,
David Girard, c.1500, The Louvre


                                                                  25
Special Revelation
                                   General revelation (natural
                                   theology) is too limited and
                                   too speculative

                                   Special revelation includes
                                   miraculous events

                                    Improper to rule out the
                                    occurrence of miracles without
                                    an open investigation of these
                                    historical reports
     The Marriage at Cana,
David Girard, c.1500, The Louvre


                                                                     25
The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles




                          Healing Jairus’ Daughter,
                     Ilja Repin, 1871, St. Petersburg




                                                        26
The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles
4 Gospels record 35 of Jesus’
many miracles




                                     Healing Jairus’ Daughter,
                                Ilja Repin, 1871, St. Petersburg




                                                                   26
The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles
4 Gospels record 35 of Jesus’
many miracles

 Jesus demonstrated authority
 over nature, disease, demons,
 and death




                                      Healing Jairus’ Daughter,
                                 Ilja Repin, 1871, St. Petersburg




                                                                    26
The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles
4 Gospels record 35 of Jesus’
many miracles

 Jesus demonstrated authority
 over nature, disease, demons,
 and death

 Redemptive purpose


                                      Healing Jairus’ Daughter,
                                 Ilja Repin, 1871, St. Petersburg




                                                                    26
The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles
4 Gospels record 35 of Jesus’
many miracles

 Jesus demonstrated authority
 over nature, disease, demons,
 and death

 Redemptive purpose

 Accomplished with great
 restraint                            Healing Jairus’ Daughter,
                                 Ilja Repin, 1871, St. Petersburg




                                                                    26
The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles
4 Gospels record 35 of Jesus’
many miracles

 Jesus demonstrated authority
 over nature, disease, demons,
 and death

 Redemptive purpose

 Accomplished with great
 restraint                            Healing Jairus’ Daughter,
                                 Ilja Repin, 1871, St. Petersburg
 Publicly done



                                                                    26
The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles




     The Raising of Lazarus,
Carvaggio, c.1609, Messina, Italy

                                      27
The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles
                                    Often hostile eyewitnesses present




     The Raising of Lazarus,
Carvaggio, c.1609, Messina, Italy

                                                                         27
The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles
                                    Often hostile eyewitnesses present

                                    None of Christ's critics ever denied
                                    that He performed these miracles




     The Raising of Lazarus,
Carvaggio, c.1609, Messina, Italy

                                                                           27
The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles
                                    Often hostile eyewitnesses present

                                    None of Christ's critics ever denied
                                    that He performed these miracles

                                    His miracles set Him apart from the
                                    founders and leaders of other
                                    world religions




     The Raising of Lazarus,
Carvaggio, c.1609, Messina, Italy

                                                                           27
The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles
                                    Often hostile eyewitnesses present

                                    None of Christ's critics ever denied
                                    that He performed these miracles

                                    His miracles set Him apart from the
                                    founders and leaders of other
                                    world religions

                                    Attempts to discredit His miracles
                                    by offering natural explanations for
                                    His supernatural accomplishments
     The Raising of Lazarus,
Carvaggio, c.1609, Messina, Italy

                                                                           27
The Greatest Miracle:
Jesus’ Resurrection




                       Pietro Lorenzetti, Resurrection,
                    c.1320 Fresco, San Francesco, Assisi



                                                           28
The Greatest Miracle:
Jesus’ Resurrection

 "The sign of Jonah the
 prophet" (the Resurrection;
 Matt. 12:39-40)




                                  Pietro Lorenzetti, Resurrection,
                               c.1320 Fresco, San Francesco, Assisi



                                                                      28
The Greatest Miracle:
Jesus’ Resurrection

 "The sign of Jonah the
 prophet" (the Resurrection;
 Matt. 12:39-40)

 "Why believe in miracles?"
 The Resurrection



                                  Pietro Lorenzetti, Resurrection,
                               c.1320 Fresco, San Francesco, Assisi



                                                                      28
The Greatest Miracle:
Jesus’ Resurrection

 "The sign of Jonah the
 prophet" (the Resurrection;
 Matt. 12:39-40)

 "Why believe in miracles?"
 The Resurrection

  Abundant historical evidence

                                    Pietro Lorenzetti, Resurrection,
                                 c.1320 Fresco, San Francesco, Assisi



                                                                        28
Option III:
Miracles Are Possible
                          29
Responding in Faith




                          Albrecht Altdorfer,
                      The Resurrection of Christ,
                           c.1516, Vienna

                                                    30
Responding in Faith
 Many believe in the Resurrection and
 miracles yet still refuse to place their
 trust in Christ




                                                Albrecht Altdorfer,
                                            The Resurrection of Christ,
                                                 c.1516, Vienna

                                                                          30
Responding in Faith
 Many believe in the Resurrection and
 miracles yet still refuse to place their
 trust in Christ

  Eyewitnesses also didn’t always respond
  with faith




                                                Albrecht Altdorfer,
                                            The Resurrection of Christ,
                                                 c.1516, Vienna

                                                                          30
Responding in Faith
 Many believe in the Resurrection and
 miracles yet still refuse to place their
 trust in Christ

  Eyewitnesses also didn’t always respond
  with faith

  The heart of an unregenerate person is at
  enmity with God and refuses to bow to
  His revelation and authority

                                                  Albrecht Altdorfer,
                                              The Resurrection of Christ,
                                                   c.1516, Vienna

                                                                            30
Responding in Faith
 Many believe in the Resurrection and
 miracles yet still refuse to place their
 trust in Christ

  Eyewitnesses also didn’t always respond
  with faith

  The heart of an unregenerate person is at
  enmity with God and refuses to bow to
  His revelation and authority

  Only the Holy Spirit can convict of sin         Albrecht Altdorfer,
                                              The Resurrection of Christ,
                                                   c.1516, Vienna

                                                                            30
Objection: His Revelation Is Too
Remote




                                   31
Objection: His Revelation Is Too
Remote
  “If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a
  more direct way”




                                                                  31
Objection: His Revelation Is Too
Remote
  “If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a
  more direct way”

   Objector wants God to clobber him into the kingdom by forcing
   him to believe




                                                                   31
Objection: His Revelation Is Too
Remote
  “If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a
  more direct way”

   Objector wants God to clobber him into the kingdom by forcing
   him to believe

   "Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us" (John 14:8)




                                                                     31
Objection: His Revelation Is Too
Remote
  “If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a
  more direct way”

   Objector wants God to clobber him into the kingdom by forcing
   him to believe

   "Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us" (John 14:8)

   God has done enough




                                                                     31
Objection: His Revelation Is Too
Remote
  “If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a
  more direct way”

   Objector wants God to clobber him into the kingdom by forcing
   him to believe

   "Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us" (John 14:8)

   God has done enough

   Second Coming: Judgment, not an offer of salvation




                                                                     31
Miracles: Catalysts, not Creators
of Faith




                                    32
Miracles: Catalysts, not Creators
of Faith
   Miracles cannot create faith, but they can be used by the Holy
   Spirit as catalysts to faith




                                                                    32
Miracles: Catalysts, not Creators
of Faith
   Miracles cannot create faith, but they can be used by the Holy
   Spirit as catalysts to faith

   Christ's miracles (especially the Resurrection) demonstrate the
   validity of His claims




                                                                     32
Miracles: Catalysts, not Creators
of Faith
   Miracles cannot create faith, but they can be used by the Holy
   Spirit as catalysts to faith

   Christ's miracles (especially the Resurrection) demonstrate the
   validity of His claims

    Profound implications for the eternal destiny of every human being




                                                                         32
Appendix:
The Resurrection
                   33
Significance of the Resurrection
  A pillar supporting the Christian faith




                                            34
"If Christ has not been raised,
                                            your faith is worthless;
                                          you are still in your sins.




Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished.
                     If we have hoped in Christ in this life only,
                           we are of all men most to be pitied"
                                                    (1 Cor. 15:17-19)


                                                                        35
Significance of the Resurrection
  A pillar supporting the Christian faith




                                            36
Significance of the Resurrection
  A pillar supporting the Christian faith

  Apostles preaching revolved around the Resurrection (e.g.,
  Acts 1:22; 2:24-32; 3:15)




                                                               36
Significance of the Resurrection
  A pillar supporting the Christian faith

  Apostles preaching revolved around the Resurrection (e.g.,
  Acts 1:22; 2:24-32; 3:15)

  Without the resurrection of Christ, Christianity would be unable
  to withstand critical attacks




                                                                     36
Fierce Skeptics Converted




                            37
Fierce Skeptics Converted




                            37
Fierce Skeptics Converted




                            37
Fierce Skeptics Converted




                            37
Fierce Skeptics Converted




                            37
Historical Facts




Hans Holbein the Younger (1497-1543)
             The Passion
    Oil on limewood, 1524-1525
     Kunstmuseum, Öffentliche
       Kunstsammlung, Basle


                                       38
Historical Facts
                                       The facts are well grounded in
                                       historical and critical procedures




Hans Holbein the Younger (1497-1543)
             The Passion
    Oil on limewood, 1524-1525
     Kunstmuseum, Öffentliche
       Kunstsammlung, Basle


                                                                            38
Historical Facts
                                       The facts are well grounded in
                                       historical and critical procedures

                                       Today the consensus of scholarship
                                       acknowledges the historicity of
                                       these facts




Hans Holbein the Younger (1497-1543)
             The Passion
    Oil on limewood, 1524-1525
     Kunstmuseum, Öffentliche
       Kunstsammlung, Basle


                                                                            38
Historical Facts
                                       The facts are well grounded in
                                       historical and critical procedures

                                       Today the consensus of scholarship
                                       acknowledges the historicity of
                                       these facts

                                        Disagree on the inspiration of
                                        Scripture



Hans Holbein the Younger (1497-1543)
             The Passion
    Oil on limewood, 1524-1525
     Kunstmuseum, Öffentliche
       Kunstsammlung, Basle


                                                                            38
Historical Facts
                                       The facts are well grounded in
                                       historical and critical procedures

                                       Today the consensus of scholarship
                                       acknowledges the historicity of
                                       these facts

                                        Disagree on the inspiration of
                                        Scripture

                                        Disagree on the interpretation of this
                                        historical data
Hans Holbein the Younger (1497-1543)
             The Passion
    Oil on limewood, 1524-1525
     Kunstmuseum, Öffentliche
       Kunstsammlung, Basle


                                                                                 38
Historical Facts
                                       The facts are well grounded in
                                       historical and critical procedures

                                       Today the consensus of scholarship
                                       acknowledges the historicity of
                                       these facts

                                        Disagree on the inspiration of
                                        Scripture

                                        Disagree on the interpretation of this
                                        historical data
Hans Holbein the Younger (1497-1543)
             The Passion
    Oil on limewood, 1524-1525         Pre-resurrection and Post-
     Kunstmuseum, Öffentliche
       Kunstsammlung, Basle
                                       resurrection facts

                                                                                 38
1. Jesus Was Tortured and
Crucified
                   The Flagellation of Our Lord Jesus Christ,
                   Adolphe Bougeureau, 1880, La Rochelle




                                                                39
1. Jesus Was Tortured and
Crucified
                    The Flagellation of Our Lord Jesus Christ,
                    Adolphe Bougeureau, 1880, La Rochelle


 Endured 6 trials




                                                                 39
1. Jesus Was Tortured and
Crucified
                       The Flagellation of Our Lord Jesus Christ,
                       Adolphe Bougeureau, 1880, La Rochelle


 Endured 6 trials

 Tortured repeatedly




                                                                    39
1. Jesus Was Tortured and
Crucified
                       The Flagellation of Our Lord Jesus Christ,
                       Adolphe Bougeureau, 1880, La Rochelle


 Endured 6 trials

 Tortured repeatedly

 Carried His cross




                                                                    39
1. Jesus Was Tortured and
Crucified
                                  The Flagellation of Our Lord Jesus Christ,
                                  Adolphe Bougeureau, 1880, La Rochelle


 Endured 6 trials

 Tortured repeatedly

 Carried His cross

 Physically nailed to the cross




                                                                               39
1. Jesus Was Tortured and
Crucified
                                  The Flagellation of Our Lord Jesus Christ,
                                  Adolphe Bougeureau, 1880, La Rochelle


 Endured 6 trials

 Tortured repeatedly

 Carried His cross

 Physically nailed to the cross

 Speared to confirm his death




                                                                               39
2. Jesus’ Body Was Placed In a
Guarded Tomb




                      The Entombment of Christ,
                    Sisto Badalocchio, 1610, Rome


                                                    40
2. Jesus’ Body Was Placed In a
Guarded Tomb
 Joseph of Arimathea's solid
 rock-hewn tomb




                                 The Entombment of Christ,
                               Sisto Badalocchio, 1610, Rome


                                                               40
2. Jesus’ Body Was Placed In a
Guarded Tomb
 Joseph of Arimathea's solid
 rock-hewn tomb

 Single entrance closed off
 with a massive stone




                                 The Entombment of Christ,
                               Sisto Badalocchio, 1610, Rome


                                                               40
2. Jesus’ Body Was Placed In a
Guarded Tomb
 Joseph of Arimathea's solid
 rock-hewn tomb

 Single entrance closed off
 with a massive stone

 Jesus' body bound in linen
 wrappings




                                 The Entombment of Christ,
                               Sisto Badalocchio, 1610, Rome


                                                               40
2. Jesus’ Body Was Placed In a
Guarded Tomb
 Joseph of Arimathea's solid
 rock-hewn tomb

 Single entrance closed off
 with a massive stone

 Jesus' body bound in linen
 wrappings

 Pilate ordered a guard of
 soldiers
                                 The Entombment of Christ,
                               Sisto Badalocchio, 1610, Rome


                                                               40
2. Jesus’ Body Was Placed In a
Guarded Tomb
 Joseph of Arimathea's solid
 rock-hewn tomb

 Single entrance closed off
 with a massive stone

 Jesus' body bound in linen
 wrappings

 Pilate ordered a guard of
 soldiers

 Roman seal certification         The Entombment of Christ,
                               Sisto Badalocchio, 1610, Rome


                                                               40
3. The Disciples Were Clearly
Discouraged by Jesus’ Crucifixion




                     The Entombment of Christ,
                      Guercino, 1656, Chicago


                                                 41
3. The Disciples Were Clearly
Discouraged by Jesus’ Crucifixion

 Entertained no hope that
 Jesus would rise from the
 dead (Luke 24)




                             The Entombment of Christ,
                              Guercino, 1656, Chicago


                                                         41
3. The Disciples Were Clearly
Discouraged by Jesus’ Crucifixion

 Entertained no hope that
 Jesus would rise from the
 dead (Luke 24)

  Despite Jesus' repeated
  predictions of His
  resurrection


                             The Entombment of Christ,
                              Guercino, 1656, Chicago


                                                         41
4. Friends Found the Tomb Empty
on the Third Day




      Resurrection - Morn,
 Herbert Gustave Schmalz, 1895




                                  42
4. Friends Found the Tomb Empty
on the Third Day
                                 Jesus' friend Mary
                                 Magdalene and other
                                 followers found the empty
                                 tomb




      Resurrection - Morn,
 Herbert Gustave Schmalz, 1895




                                                             42
4. Friends Found the Tomb Empty
on the Third Day
                                 Jesus' friend Mary
                                 Magdalene and other
                                 followers found the empty
                                 tomb

                                 Fact clearly admitted even
                                 by Jesus' enemies




      Resurrection - Morn,
 Herbert Gustave Schmalz, 1895




                                                              42
4. Friends Found the Tomb Empty
on the Third Day
                                 Jesus' friend Mary
                                 Magdalene and other
                                 followers found the empty
                                 tomb

                                 Fact clearly admitted even
                                 by Jesus' enemies

                                  Chief priests and elders
                                  bribed the guard to say that
                                  the body was stolen by His
      Resurrection - Morn,        disciples (Matt. 28:11-15)
 Herbert Gustave Schmalz, 1895




                                                                 42
4. Friends Found the Tomb Empty
on the Third Day
                                 Jesus' friend Mary
                                 Magdalene and other
                                 followers found the empty
                                 tomb

                                 Fact clearly admitted even
                                 by Jesus' enemies

                                  Chief priests and elders
                                  bribed the guard to say that
                                  the body was stolen by His
      Resurrection - Morn,        disciples (Matt. 28:11-15)
 Herbert Gustave Schmalz, 1895
                                  Exhume the body

                                                                 42
5. The Roman Seal Was Broken and
the Large Stone Was Moved Away




            The Angel Is Opening Christ’s Tomb
          Benjamin Gerritsz. Cuyp, 1640, Budapest


                                                    43
6. The Guard Left the Empty
Tomb and Reported




         The Resurrection
   Andrea Mantegna, Late 1400’s


                                  44
6. The Guard Left the Empty
Tomb and Reported

                                  Reported what had
                                  happened to the Chief
                                  Priests




         The Resurrection
   Andrea Mantegna, Late 1400’s


                                                          44
6. The Guard Left the Empty
Tomb and Reported

                                  Reported what had
                                  happened to the Chief
                                  Priests

                                  Given a large bribe




         The Resurrection
   Andrea Mantegna, Late 1400’s


                                                          44
6. The Guard Left the Empty
Tomb and Reported

                                  Reported what had
                                  happened to the Chief
                                  Priests

                                  Given a large bribe

                                  Promised protection from
                                  punishment/execution by
                                  Pilate

         The Resurrection
   Andrea Mantegna, Late 1400’s


                                                             44
7. Jesus’ Grave-clothes Were
Found Empty Yet Undisturbed




                               45
7. Jesus’ Grave-clothes Were
  Found Empty Yet Undisturbed
John 20:6-8 “So Peter and the other disciple went forth,
and they were going to the tomb.




                                                           45
7. Jesus’ Grave-clothes Were
  Found Empty Yet Undisturbed
John 20:6-8 “So Peter and the other disciple went forth,
and they were going to the tomb.
The two were running together;
and the other disciple ran ahead faster than Peter and came to the tomb first;




                                                                                45
7. Jesus’ Grave-clothes Were
  Found Empty Yet Undisturbed
John 20:6-8 “So Peter and the other disciple went forth,
and they were going to the tomb.
The two were running together;
and the other disciple ran ahead faster than Peter and came to the tomb first;
and stooping and looking in,
he saw the linen wrappings lying there; but he did not go in.




                                                                                45
7. Jesus’ Grave-clothes Were
  Found Empty Yet Undisturbed
John 20:6-8 “So Peter and the other disciple went forth,
and they were going to the tomb.
The two were running together;
and the other disciple ran ahead faster than Peter and came to the tomb first;
and stooping and looking in,
he saw the linen wrappings lying there; but he did not go in.
And so Simon Peter also came, following him, and entered the tomb;
and he saw the linen wrappings lying there,




                                                                                45
7. Jesus’ Grave-clothes Were
  Found Empty Yet Undisturbed
John 20:6-8 “So Peter and the other disciple went forth,
and they were going to the tomb.
The two were running together;
and the other disciple ran ahead faster than Peter and came to the tomb first;
and stooping and looking in,
he saw the linen wrappings lying there; but he did not go in.
And so Simon Peter also came, following him, and entered the tomb;
and he saw the linen wrappings lying there,
and the face-cloth which had been on His head,
not lying with the linen wrappings, but rolled up in a place by itself.




                                                                                45
7. Jesus’ Grave-clothes Were
  Found Empty Yet Undisturbed
John 20:6-8 “So Peter and the other disciple went forth,
and they were going to the tomb.
The two were running together;
and the other disciple ran ahead faster than Peter and came to the tomb first;
and stooping and looking in,
he saw the linen wrappings lying there; but he did not go in.
And so Simon Peter also came, following him, and entered the tomb;
and he saw the linen wrappings lying there,
and the face-cloth which had been on His head,
not lying with the linen wrappings, but rolled up in a place by itself.
So the other disciple who had first come to the tomb then also entered,
and he saw and believed.”


                                                                                45
8. Multiple Bodily Appearances of
the Resurrected Jesus




        Christ Appearing to His Mother
        Rogier van der Weyden, c.1436


                                         46
8. Multiple Bodily Appearances of
the Resurrected Jesus
                                         Eyewitness accounts




        Christ Appearing to His Mother
        Rogier van der Weyden, c.1436


                                                               46
8. Multiple Bodily Appearances of
the Resurrected Jesus
                                         Eyewitness accounts

                                         Variety of circumstances and
                                         people




        Christ Appearing to His Mother
        Rogier van der Weyden, c.1436


                                                                        46
8. Multiple Bodily Appearances of
the Resurrected Jesus
                                         Eyewitness accounts

                                         Variety of circumstances and
                                         people

                                         Appeared to >500 people
                                         once (1 Cor. 15:6)




        Christ Appearing to His Mother
        Rogier van der Weyden, c.1436


                                                                        46
8. Multiple Bodily Appearances of
the Resurrected Jesus
                                         Eyewitness accounts

                                         Variety of circumstances and
                                         people

                                         Appeared to >500 people
                                         once (1 Cor. 15:6)

                                         First witnesses were women




        Christ Appearing to His Mother
        Rogier van der Weyden, c.1436


                                                                        46
8. Multiple Bodily Appearances of
the Resurrected Jesus
                                         Eyewitness accounts

                                         Variety of circumstances and
                                         people

                                         Appeared to >500 people
                                         once (1 Cor. 15:6)

                                         First witnesses were women

                                         Appeared to James and Paul


        Christ Appearing to His Mother
        Rogier van der Weyden, c.1436


                                                                        46
8. Multiple Bodily Appearances of
the Resurrected Jesus
                                         Eyewitness accounts

                                         Variety of circumstances and
                                         people

                                         Appeared to >500 people
                                         once (1 Cor. 15:6)

                                         First witnesses were women

                                         Appeared to James and Paul

                                         Lives of witnesses radically
        Christ Appearing to His Mother   transformed
        Rogier van der Weyden, c.1436


                                                                        46
Conclusions from the Historical
Facts




                                  47
Conclusions from the Historical
Facts
  These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians




                                                                47
Conclusions from the Historical
Facts
  These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians

   Can and have been interpreted in various ways to avoid the
   conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead




                                                                47
Conclusions from the Historical
Facts
  These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians

   Can and have been interpreted in various ways to avoid the
   conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead

     Naturalistic theories regarding the tomb and the appearances




                                                                    47
Conclusions from the Historical
Facts
  These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians

   Can and have been interpreted in various ways to avoid the
   conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead

     Naturalistic theories regarding the tomb and the appearances

      All of these fail to explain the historical data




                                                                    47
Conclusions from the Historical
Facts
  These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians

   Can and have been interpreted in various ways to avoid the
   conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead

     Naturalistic theories regarding the tomb and the appearances

      All of these fail to explain the historical data

      Additional circumstantial evidence that supplements this data and makes
      the case for the Resurrection even stronger




                                                                                47
Explanations Regarding the
Tomb




                            Resurrection
                      Vecchietta (1412-1480)
                            Bronze, 1472
                     Frick Collection, New York



                                                  48
Explanations Regarding the
Tomb
 Tomb was either occupied or
 empty on the first day of the
 week




                                       Resurrection
                                 Vecchietta (1412-1480)
                                       Bronze, 1472
                                Frick Collection, New York



                                                             48
Explanations Regarding the
Tomb
 Tomb was either occupied or
 empty on the first day of the
 week

 4 Theories: Occupied




                                       Resurrection
                                 Vecchietta (1412-1480)
                                       Bronze, 1472
                                Frick Collection, New York



                                                             48
Explanations Regarding the
Tomb
 Tomb was either occupied or
 empty on the first day of the
 week

 4 Theories: Occupied

 4 Theories: Empty



                                       Resurrection
                                 Vecchietta (1412-1480)
                                       Bronze, 1472
                                Frick Collection, New York



                                                             48
Occupied:
1. Unknown Tomb




             Christ Appearing to Mary Magdelene After the Resurrection,
                                 William Etty, c.1790




                                                                          49
Occupied:
1. Unknown Tomb
All four Gospels state that
Joseph of Arimathea obtained
permission from Pilate to bury
the body of Jesus in his newly
hewn tomb




                                 Christ Appearing to Mary Magdelene After the Resurrection,
                                                     William Etty, c.1790




                                                                                              49
Occupied:
1. Unknown Tomb
All four Gospels state that
Joseph of Arimathea obtained
permission from Pilate to bury
the body of Jesus in his newly
hewn tomb

Joseph of Arimathea knew the
location of his own private
garden tomb

                                 Christ Appearing to Mary Magdelene After the Resurrection,
                                                     William Etty, c.1790




                                                                                              49
Occupied:
1. Unknown Tomb
All four Gospels state that
Joseph of Arimathea obtained
permission from Pilate to bury
the body of Jesus in his newly
hewn tomb

Joseph of Arimathea knew the
location of his own private
garden tomb

The women and disciples had      Christ Appearing to Mary Magdelene After the Resurrection,
no problem finding Jesus’ tomb                        William Etty, c.1790




                                                                                              49
Occupied:
2. Wrong Tomb




                50
Occupied:
2. Wrong Tomb
 This theory eliminates the "He has risen" of Mark 16:6




                                                          50
Occupied:
2. Wrong Tomb
 This theory eliminates the "He has risen" of Mark 16:6

 "He is not here; behold, here is the place where they laid
 Him." He was telling them that they had the wrong tomb,
 but the women misunderstood




                                                              50
Occupied:
2. Wrong Tomb
 This theory eliminates the "He has risen" of Mark 16:6

 "He is not here; behold, here is the place where they laid
 Him." He was telling them that they had the wrong tomb,
 but the women misunderstood

 No textual basis; distortion




                                                              50
Occupied:
2. Wrong Tomb
 This theory eliminates the "He has risen" of Mark 16:6

 "He is not here; behold, here is the place where they laid
 Him." He was telling them that they had the wrong tomb,
 but the women misunderstood

 No textual basis; distortion

 Requires the absurd conclusion that Peter and John,
 Joseph of Arimathea, the guards, and the Jewish and
 Roman authorities all went to the wrong tomb




                                                              50
Occupied:
3. Spiritual Resurrection




                             Resurrection of Christ
                           Paolo Uccello (1397-1475)
                       Stained glass window, 1443-1445
                               Duomo, Florence



                                                         51
Occupied:
3. Spiritual Resurrection
  Jesus was resurrected
  spiritually, not bodily




                                  Resurrection of Christ
                                Paolo Uccello (1397-1475)
                            Stained glass window, 1443-1445
                                    Duomo, Florence



                                                              51
Occupied:
3. Spiritual Resurrection
  Jesus was resurrected
  spiritually, not bodily

  Disciples misunderstood the
  nature of His resurrection




                                      Resurrection of Christ
                                    Paolo Uccello (1397-1475)
                                Stained glass window, 1443-1445
                                        Duomo, Florence



                                                                  51
Occupied:
3. Spiritual Resurrection
  Jesus was resurrected
  spiritually, not bodily

  Disciples misunderstood the
  nature of His resurrection

  Jesus placed special
  emphasis on the fact that His
  body was resurrected


                                        Resurrection of Christ
                                      Paolo Uccello (1397-1475)
                                  Stained glass window, 1443-1445
                                          Duomo, Florence



                                                                    51
Occupied:
3. Spiritual Resurrection
  Jesus was resurrected
  spiritually, not bodily

  Disciples misunderstood the
  nature of His resurrection

  Jesus placed special
  emphasis on the fact that His
  body was resurrected

  Disciples touched His body
                                        Resurrection of Christ
                                      Paolo Uccello (1397-1475)
                                  Stained glass window, 1443-1445
                                          Duomo, Florence



                                                                    51
Occupied:
3. Spiritual Resurrection
  Jesus was resurrected
  spiritually, not bodily

  Disciples misunderstood the
  nature of His resurrection

  Jesus placed special
  emphasis on the fact that His
  body was resurrected

  Disciples touched His body
                                        Resurrection of Christ
                                      Paolo Uccello (1397-1475)
  Spiritual resurrection          Stained glass window, 1443-1445
  unacceptable to Jews                    Duomo, Florence



                                                                    51
Occupied:
4. Jesus Had a Twin




                 Jesus Washing Peter's Feet at the Last Supper,
                       Ford Madox Brown, 1865, London




                                                                  52
Occupied:
4. Jesus Had a Twin
 A twin brother or someone
 who looked like Jesus was
 crucified and buried in His
 place




                              Jesus Washing Peter's Feet at the Last Supper,
                                    Ford Madox Brown, 1865, London




                                                                               52
Occupied:
4. Jesus Had a Twin
 A twin brother or someone
 who looked like Jesus was
 crucified and buried in His
 place

 No supporting evidence and
 contradicts many clear
 passages


                              Jesus Washing Peter's Feet at the Last Supper,
                                    Ford Madox Brown, 1865, London




                                                                               52
Occupied:
4. Jesus Had a Twin
 A twin brother or someone
 who looked like Jesus was
 crucified and buried in His
 place

 No supporting evidence and
 contradicts many clear
 passages

  Spear wound
                              Jesus Washing Peter's Feet at the Last Supper,
                                    Ford Madox Brown, 1865, London




                                                                               52
Occupied:
4. Jesus Had a Twin
 A twin brother or someone
 who looked like Jesus was
 crucified and buried in His
 place

 No supporting evidence and
 contradicts many clear
 passages

  Spear wound
                              Jesus Washing Peter's Feet at the Last Supper,
  Physical ascension                Ford Madox Brown, 1865, London




                                                                               52
Empty:
1. Friends Stole the Body




        Entombment of Christ,
Rogier van der Weyden, 1450, Florence


                                        53
Empty:
1. Friends Stole the Body
                                        One or more of Jesus' friends
                                        stole His body




        Entombment of Christ,
Rogier van der Weyden, 1450, Florence


                                                                        53
Empty:
1. Friends Stole the Body
                                        One or more of Jesus' friends
                                        stole His body

                                        Guards faced execution for
                                        failure to guard Jesus’ body -
                                        asleep?




        Entombment of Christ,
Rogier van der Weyden, 1450, Florence


                                                                         53
Empty:
1. Friends Stole the Body
                                        One or more of Jesus' friends
                                        stole His body

                                        Guards faced execution for
                                        failure to guard Jesus’ body -
                                        asleep?

                                        Problem of disciple’s motive




        Entombment of Christ,
Rogier van der Weyden, 1450, Florence


                                                                         53
Empty:
1. Friends Stole the Body
                                        One or more of Jesus' friends
                                        stole His body

                                        Guards faced execution for
                                        failure to guard Jesus’ body -
                                        asleep?

                                        Problem of disciple’s motive

                                         Nothing to gain/everything to
                                         lose


        Entombment of Christ,
Rogier van der Weyden, 1450, Florence


                                                                         53
Empty:
1. Friends Stole the Body
                                        One or more of Jesus' friends
                                        stole His body

                                        Guards faced execution for
                                        failure to guard Jesus’ body -
                                        asleep?

                                        Problem of disciple’s motive

                                         Nothing to gain/everything to
                                         lose

                                         Frightened disciples vs.
        Entombment of Christ,            professional soldiers
Rogier van der Weyden, 1450, Florence


                                                                         53
Empty:
 2. Enemies Stole the Body




Dead Christ Attended By Two Angels,
  Alessandro Allori, c. late 1500’s


                                      54
Empty:
 2. Enemies Stole the Body
                                      The enemies of Jesus stole
                                      the body




Dead Christ Attended By Two Angels,
  Alessandro Allori, c. late 1500’s


                                                                   54
Empty:
 2. Enemies Stole the Body
                                      The enemies of Jesus stole
                                      the body

                                      Problem of motive




Dead Christ Attended By Two Angels,
  Alessandro Allori, c. late 1500’s


                                                                   54
Empty:
 2. Enemies Stole the Body
                                      The enemies of Jesus stole
                                      the body

                                      Problem of motive

                                       Could have displayed the body
                                       and killed all Resurrection
                                       rumors




Dead Christ Attended By Two Angels,
  Alessandro Allori, c. late 1500’s


                                                                       54
Empty:
 2. Enemies Stole the Body
                                      The enemies of Jesus stole
                                      the body

                                      Problem of motive

                                       Could have displayed the body
                                       and killed all Resurrection
                                       rumors

                                       Complete silence by Jewish
                                       and Roman authorities
                                       indicated His body was
Dead Christ Attended By Two Angels,    inexplicably gone
  Alessandro Allori, c. late 1500’s


                                                                       54
Empty:
   3. Swoon Theory




The Body of the Dead Christ in the Tomb,
 Hans Holbein the Younger, 1521, Basle


                                           55
Empty:
   3. Swoon Theory
       Jesus "swooned" on the cross and appeared to be dead, but revived




The Body of the Dead Christ in the Tomb,
 Hans Holbein the Younger, 1521, Basle


                                                                           55
Empty:
   3. Swoon Theory
       Jesus "swooned" on the cross and appeared to be dead, but revived

       Jesus endured the beatings at His trials, the crown of thorns, the terrible
       scourging, the crucifixion, and even the spear thrust in His side and
       somehow survived




The Body of the Dead Christ in the Tomb,
 Hans Holbein the Younger, 1521, Basle


                                                                                     55
Empty:
   3. Swoon Theory
       Jesus "swooned" on the cross and appeared to be dead, but revived

       Jesus endured the beatings at His trials, the crown of thorns, the terrible
       scourging, the crucifixion, and even the spear thrust in His side and
       somehow survived

       Professional executioners, loss of blood, cold, no food, water, or
       assistance, revives. A ludicrous theory




The Body of the Dead Christ in the Tomb,
 Hans Holbein the Younger, 1521, Basle


                                                                                     55
Empty:
4. Passover Plot Theory




                          56
Empty:
4. Passover Plot Theory
  Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the
  Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament
  messianic passages




                                                                   56
Empty:
4. Passover Plot Theory
  Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the
  Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament
  messianic passages

  Drugged and appeared to be dead




                                                                   56
Empty:
4. Passover Plot Theory
  Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the
  Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament
  messianic passages

  Drugged and appeared to be dead

  Lived only briefly after being revived because of His spear wound




                                                                     56
Empty:
4. Passover Plot Theory
  Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the
  Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament
  messianic passages

  Drugged and appeared to be dead

  Lived only briefly after being revived because of His spear wound

  Fanciful scenario appears in The Passover Plot, by Hugh
  Schoenfield




                                                                     56
Empty:
4. Passover Plot Theory
  Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the
  Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament
  messianic passages

  Drugged and appeared to be dead

  Lived only briefly after being revived because of His spear wound

  Fanciful scenario appears in The Passover Plot, by Hugh
  Schoenfield

  Anti-resurrection theory is totally bereft of evidence


                                                                     56
Conclusion: The Empty Tomb




Jesus Appears to Mary Magdelene
 Lavinia Fontana, 1581, Florence


                                   57
Conclusion: The Empty Tomb
                                   None of these theories even
                                   comes close to accounting
                                   for:




Jesus Appears to Mary Magdelene
 Lavinia Fontana, 1581, Florence


                                                                 57
Conclusion: The Empty Tomb
                                   None of these theories even
                                   comes close to accounting
                                   for:

                                    The historical facts associated
                                    with the empty tomb




Jesus Appears to Mary Magdelene
 Lavinia Fontana, 1581, Florence


                                                                      57
Conclusion: The Empty Tomb
                                   None of these theories even
                                   comes close to accounting
                                   for:

                                    The historical facts associated
                                    with the empty tomb

                                    The appearances of the
                                    resurrected Christ




Jesus Appears to Mary Magdelene
 Lavinia Fontana, 1581, Florence


                                                                      57
Conclusion: The Empty Tomb
                                   None of these theories even
                                   comes close to accounting
                                   for:

                                    The historical facts associated
                                    with the empty tomb

                                    The appearances of the
                                    resurrected Christ

                                    The radical changes in the lives
                                    of the disciples

Jesus Appears to Mary Magdelene
 Lavinia Fontana, 1581, Florence


                                                                       57
Conclusion: The Empty Tomb
                                   None of these theories even
                                   comes close to accounting
                                   for:

                                    The historical facts associated
                                    with the empty tomb

                                    The appearances of the
                                    resurrected Christ

                                    The radical changes in the lives
                                    of the disciples

Jesus Appears to Mary Magdelene     Distortion of clear evidence
 Lavinia Fontana, 1581, Florence


                                                                       57
Explanation of the Appearances:
Witnesses Lied




                                  58
Explanation of the Appearances:
Witnesses Lied
                 The disciples all lied about
                 seeing the resurrected Jesus




                                                58
Explanation of the Appearances:
Witnesses Lied
                 The disciples all lied about
                 seeing the resurrected Jesus

                 Contradicts the historical
                 accounts




                                                58
Explanation of the Appearances:
Witnesses Lied
                 The disciples all lied about
                 seeing the resurrected Jesus

                 Contradicts the historical
                 accounts

                 Therefore all of the disciples
                 who claimed to have seen the
                 Lord (including the 500 people
                 mentioned by Paul) were liars




                                                  58
Explanation of the Appearances:
Witnesses Lied
                 The disciples all lied about
                 seeing the resurrected Jesus

                 Contradicts the historical
                 accounts

                 Therefore all of the disciples
                 who claimed to have seen the
                 Lord (including the 500 people
                 mentioned by Paul) were liars

                  Many were martyred for their
                  testimony


                                                  58
Explanation of the Appearances:
Hallucinations




                                  59
Explanation of the Appearances:
Hallucinations
                The post-resurrection appearances
                of Christ were merely hallucinations
                in the minds of the disciples




                                                       59
Explanation of the Appearances:
Hallucinations
                The post-resurrection appearances
                of Christ were merely hallucinations
                in the minds of the disciples

                Hallucinations are private, not public
                experiences




                                                         59
Explanation of the Appearances:
Hallucinations
                The post-resurrection appearances
                of Christ were merely hallucinations
                in the minds of the disciples

                Hallucinations are private, not public
                experiences

                Hallucinations restricted to favorable
                times/places & certain types of
                unstable people




                                                         59
Explanation of the Appearances:
Hallucinations
                The post-resurrection appearances
                of Christ were merely hallucinations
                in the minds of the disciples

                Hallucinations are private, not public
                experiences

                Hallucinations restricted to favorable
                times/places & certain types of
                unstable people

                Disciples touched, talked, and ate
                with the Lord


                                                         59
Explanation of the Appearances:
Legend




                   Loch Ness Monster Legend
                     Photo, 1972, Scotland



                                              60
Explanation of the Appearances:
Legend
 The Resurrection is an
 elaborate legend created by
 the early church




                               Loch Ness Monster Legend
                                 Photo, 1972, Scotland



                                                          60
Explanation of the Appearances:
Legend
 The Resurrection is an
 elaborate legend created by
 the early church

 Resurrection backed by
 reliable, eyewitness accounts




                                 Loch Ness Monster Legend
                                   Photo, 1972, Scotland



                                                            60
Explanation of the Appearances:
Legend
 The Resurrection is an
 elaborate legend created by
 the early church

 Resurrection backed by
 reliable, eyewitness accounts

 Dating of NT precludes the
 development of such a legend


                                 Loch Ness Monster Legend
                                   Photo, 1972, Scotland



                                                            60
Explanation of the Appearances:
Legend
 The Resurrection is an
 elaborate legend created by
 the early church

 Resurrection backed by
 reliable, eyewitness accounts

 Dating of NT precludes the
 development of such a legend

 Archeological discoveries
 continue to validate the              Loch Ness Monster Legend
 historical reliability of the Bible     Photo, 1972, Scotland



                                                                  60
Circumstantial Evidence 1:
Christ Foretold His Resurrection




                                   61
Circumstantial Evidence 1:
Christ Foretold His Resurrection
                  Christ predicted His own
                  resurrection on the third day




                                                  61
Circumstantial Evidence 1:
Christ Foretold His Resurrection
                  Christ predicted His own
                  resurrection on the third day

                  Christ announced that this
                  would be the most significant
                  sign for the affirmation of His
                  truth claims




                                                   61
Circumstantial Evidence 1:
Christ Foretold His Resurrection
                  Christ predicted His own
                  resurrection on the third day

                  Christ announced that this
                  would be the most significant
                  sign for the affirmation of His
                  truth claims

                  Christ demonstrated
                  foreknowledge (Matt.
                  12:38-40; Mark 8:31; 9:31;
                  10:33-34; John 2:18-22)


                                                   61
Circumstantial Evidence 2:
Silence of the Jews




   Jews in the Synogogue
   Rembrandt (1606-1669)




                             62
Circumstantial Evidence 2:
Silence of the Jews
                           The silence of the Jewish
                           leaders about the
                           Resurrection eloquently
                           testified that they knew these
                           things were undeniable



   Jews in the Synogogue
   Rembrandt (1606-1669)




                                                           62
Circumstantial Evidence 2:
Silence of the Jews
                           The silence of the Jewish
                           leaders about the
                           Resurrection eloquently
                           testified that they knew these
                           things were undeniable

                           No refutation

   Jews in the Synogogue
   Rembrandt (1606-1669)




                                                           62
Circumstantial Evidence 3:
Changed Lives of the Disciples




       Pentecost
  Titian (1488-1576)


                                 63
Circumstantial Evidence 3:
Changed Lives of the Disciples
                       Disciples were fearful and
                       weak before the Resurrection




       Pentecost
  Titian (1488-1576)


                                                      63
Circumstantial Evidence 3:
Changed Lives of the Disciples
                       Disciples were fearful and
                       weak before the Resurrection

                       By the Day of Pentecost
                       seven weeks later, they were
                       boldly proclaiming Christ




       Pentecost
  Titian (1488-1576)


                                                      63
Circumstantial Evidence 3:
Changed Lives of the Disciples
                       Disciples were fearful and
                       weak before the Resurrection

                       By the Day of Pentecost
                       seven weeks later, they were
                       boldly proclaiming Christ

                       Transformation was complete,
                       permanent, and unanimous


       Pentecost
  Titian (1488-1576)


                                                      63
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?
Why Believe in Miracles?

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Destaque

Testing the release early: the "Release often" mantra
Testing the release early: the "Release often" mantraTesting the release early: the "Release often" mantra
Testing the release early: the "Release often" mantraDiana Mounter
 
Magic and miracles in ghana a critical examination
Magic and miracles in ghana a critical examinationMagic and miracles in ghana a critical examination
Magic and miracles in ghana a critical examinationAlexander Decker
 
Miracles Of The Sea (Pp Tminimizer)
Miracles Of The Sea (Pp Tminimizer)Miracles Of The Sea (Pp Tminimizer)
Miracles Of The Sea (Pp Tminimizer)Marco Belzoni
 
Mechanical Miracles Of The 21st Century
Mechanical Miracles Of The 21st CenturyMechanical Miracles Of The 21st Century
Mechanical Miracles Of The 21st CenturyKarthik D
 
Project File -Organic Gardening
Project File -Organic GardeningProject File -Organic Gardening
Project File -Organic Gardeningshaista_khurshid
 
Miracles for Kids Final Project
Miracles for Kids Final ProjectMiracles for Kids Final Project
Miracles for Kids Final ProjectKelly McCarthy
 
Bb World09 Project Astro Presentation with Screenshots
Bb World09 Project Astro Presentation with ScreenshotsBb World09 Project Astro Presentation with Screenshots
Bb World09 Project Astro Presentation with Screenshotsekunnen
 
A Guide to Farming Miracles (for UX teams in tough environments)
A Guide to Farming Miracles (for UX teams in tough environments)A Guide to Farming Miracles (for UX teams in tough environments)
A Guide to Farming Miracles (for UX teams in tough environments)Austin Govella
 
Astronomy Education and Outreach in Nepal
Astronomy Education and Outreach in NepalAstronomy Education and Outreach in Nepal
Astronomy Education and Outreach in NepalRijendra Thapa
 
General Astronomy
General AstronomyGeneral Astronomy
General Astronomyjaimahadik
 
Project ASTRO Reporting Success Stories and the Next Phase - BbWorld10
Project ASTRO Reporting Success Stories and the Next Phase - BbWorld10Project ASTRO Reporting Success Stories and the Next Phase - BbWorld10
Project ASTRO Reporting Success Stories and the Next Phase - BbWorld10ekunnen
 
ASTRO Training Program
ASTRO Training ProgramASTRO Training Program
ASTRO Training ProgramEhab Medhat
 
Ppt on Organic Farming B Plan.
Ppt on Organic Farming B Plan.Ppt on Organic Farming B Plan.
Ppt on Organic Farming B Plan.sourabh kumawat
 
Maxis Fibre Bundled with Astro IPTV
Maxis Fibre Bundled with Astro IPTVMaxis Fibre Bundled with Astro IPTV
Maxis Fibre Bundled with Astro IPTVMaxis Fibre
 
Astroquiz at Technex 2016
Astroquiz at Technex 2016Astroquiz at Technex 2016
Astroquiz at Technex 2016Rajan Arora
 

Destaque (20)

Testing the release early: the "Release often" mantra
Testing the release early: the "Release often" mantraTesting the release early: the "Release often" mantra
Testing the release early: the "Release often" mantra
 
Magic and miracles in ghana a critical examination
Magic and miracles in ghana a critical examinationMagic and miracles in ghana a critical examination
Magic and miracles in ghana a critical examination
 
Miracles Of The Sea (Pp Tminimizer)
Miracles Of The Sea (Pp Tminimizer)Miracles Of The Sea (Pp Tminimizer)
Miracles Of The Sea (Pp Tminimizer)
 
Mechanical Miracles Of The 21st Century
Mechanical Miracles Of The 21st CenturyMechanical Miracles Of The 21st Century
Mechanical Miracles Of The 21st Century
 
Project File -Organic Gardening
Project File -Organic GardeningProject File -Organic Gardening
Project File -Organic Gardening
 
Miracles for Kids Final Project
Miracles for Kids Final ProjectMiracles for Kids Final Project
Miracles for Kids Final Project
 
Bb World09 Project Astro Presentation with Screenshots
Bb World09 Project Astro Presentation with ScreenshotsBb World09 Project Astro Presentation with Screenshots
Bb World09 Project Astro Presentation with Screenshots
 
A Guide to Farming Miracles (for UX teams in tough environments)
A Guide to Farming Miracles (for UX teams in tough environments)A Guide to Farming Miracles (for UX teams in tough environments)
A Guide to Farming Miracles (for UX teams in tough environments)
 
Astronomy Education and Outreach in Nepal
Astronomy Education and Outreach in NepalAstronomy Education and Outreach in Nepal
Astronomy Education and Outreach in Nepal
 
General Astronomy
General AstronomyGeneral Astronomy
General Astronomy
 
Project ASTRO Reporting Success Stories and the Next Phase - BbWorld10
Project ASTRO Reporting Success Stories and the Next Phase - BbWorld10Project ASTRO Reporting Success Stories and the Next Phase - BbWorld10
Project ASTRO Reporting Success Stories and the Next Phase - BbWorld10
 
ASTRO Training Program
ASTRO Training ProgramASTRO Training Program
ASTRO Training Program
 
Financial miracles that works Free download
Financial miracles that works Free downloadFinancial miracles that works Free download
Financial miracles that works Free download
 
Prayer For Financial Help And Stability.
Prayer For Financial Help And Stability.Prayer For Financial Help And Stability.
Prayer For Financial Help And Stability.
 
As Miracles
As MiraclesAs Miracles
As Miracles
 
Black magic
Black magicBlack magic
Black magic
 
Black magic
Black magicBlack magic
Black magic
 
Ppt on Organic Farming B Plan.
Ppt on Organic Farming B Plan.Ppt on Organic Farming B Plan.
Ppt on Organic Farming B Plan.
 
Maxis Fibre Bundled with Astro IPTV
Maxis Fibre Bundled with Astro IPTVMaxis Fibre Bundled with Astro IPTV
Maxis Fibre Bundled with Astro IPTV
 
Astroquiz at Technex 2016
Astroquiz at Technex 2016Astroquiz at Technex 2016
Astroquiz at Technex 2016
 

Semelhante a Why Believe in Miracles?

I 3300 51 apologetics modern worldviews
I 3300 51 apologetics modern worldviewsI 3300 51 apologetics modern worldviews
I 3300 51 apologetics modern worldviewsS Meyer
 
Power Point: A response to The God Delusion by Dawkins
Power Point: A response to The God Delusion by DawkinsPower Point: A response to The God Delusion by Dawkins
Power Point: A response to The God Delusion by Dawkinsevidenceforchristianity
 
Response to The God Delusion: A Power Point
Response to The God Delusion: A Power PointResponse to The God Delusion: A Power Point
Response to The God Delusion: A Power Pointevidenceforchristianity
 
Recap of miracles and definitions of them
Recap of miracles and definitions of themRecap of miracles and definitions of them
Recap of miracles and definitions of themRobinHH
 
Reasons For Belief: Harvard 10/16/09 PPT and Recording
Reasons For Belief: Harvard 10/16/09 PPT and RecordingReasons For Belief: Harvard 10/16/09 PPT and Recording
Reasons For Belief: Harvard 10/16/09 PPT and Recordingevidenceforchristianity
 
Christian and Other World Views: A Power Point
Christian and Other World Views: A Power PointChristian and Other World Views: A Power Point
Christian and Other World Views: A Power Pointevidenceforchristianity
 
World View Apologetics: Ethical Answers in an Unethical World (Power Point)
World View Apologetics: Ethical Answers in an Unethical World (Power Point)World View Apologetics: Ethical Answers in an Unethical World (Power Point)
World View Apologetics: Ethical Answers in an Unethical World (Power Point)evidenceforchristianity
 
What is Science
What is ScienceWhat is Science
What is ScienceJohn Lynch
 
Power Point: The Bible: From God or Man?
Power Point: The Bible: From God or Man?Power Point: The Bible: From God or Man?
Power Point: The Bible: From God or Man?evidenceforchristianity
 
GNS 2018 scientific naturalism
GNS 2018 scientific naturalismGNS 2018 scientific naturalism
GNS 2018 scientific naturalismJohn Wilkins
 
Creationism vs evolution
Creationism vs evolutionCreationism vs evolution
Creationism vs evolutionlord
 
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...rogerskirk
 
Sample PPT from College
Sample PPT from CollegeSample PPT from College
Sample PPT from Collegemeridian2327
 
Evolutionary epistemology versus faith and justified true belief: Does scien...
Evolutionary epistemology versus faith and justified true belief:  Does scien...Evolutionary epistemology versus faith and justified true belief:  Does scien...
Evolutionary epistemology versus faith and justified true belief: Does scien...William Hall
 

Semelhante a Why Believe in Miracles? (20)

Miracles
MiraclesMiracles
Miracles
 
I 3300 51 apologetics modern worldviews
I 3300 51 apologetics modern worldviewsI 3300 51 apologetics modern worldviews
I 3300 51 apologetics modern worldviews
 
Apologetics: Miracles 2013
Apologetics: Miracles 2013Apologetics: Miracles 2013
Apologetics: Miracles 2013
 
Power Point: A response to The God Delusion by Dawkins
Power Point: A response to The God Delusion by DawkinsPower Point: A response to The God Delusion by Dawkins
Power Point: A response to The God Delusion by Dawkins
 
Response to The God Delusion: A Power Point
Response to The God Delusion: A Power PointResponse to The God Delusion: A Power Point
Response to The God Delusion: A Power Point
 
Chapter 3
Chapter 3Chapter 3
Chapter 3
 
Is Anything True Any More?
Is Anything True Any More?Is Anything True Any More?
Is Anything True Any More?
 
What is Truth?: Rutgers U. Power Point
 What is Truth?: Rutgers U. Power Point What is Truth?: Rutgers U. Power Point
What is Truth?: Rutgers U. Power Point
 
From Dust to Dust
From Dust to DustFrom Dust to Dust
From Dust to Dust
 
Recap of miracles and definitions of them
Recap of miracles and definitions of themRecap of miracles and definitions of them
Recap of miracles and definitions of them
 
Reasons For Belief: Harvard 10/16/09 PPT and Recording
Reasons For Belief: Harvard 10/16/09 PPT and RecordingReasons For Belief: Harvard 10/16/09 PPT and Recording
Reasons For Belief: Harvard 10/16/09 PPT and Recording
 
Christian and Other World Views: A Power Point
Christian and Other World Views: A Power PointChristian and Other World Views: A Power Point
Christian and Other World Views: A Power Point
 
World View Apologetics: Ethical Answers in an Unethical World (Power Point)
World View Apologetics: Ethical Answers in an Unethical World (Power Point)World View Apologetics: Ethical Answers in an Unethical World (Power Point)
World View Apologetics: Ethical Answers in an Unethical World (Power Point)
 
What is Science
What is ScienceWhat is Science
What is Science
 
Power Point: The Bible: From God or Man?
Power Point: The Bible: From God or Man?Power Point: The Bible: From God or Man?
Power Point: The Bible: From God or Man?
 
GNS 2018 scientific naturalism
GNS 2018 scientific naturalismGNS 2018 scientific naturalism
GNS 2018 scientific naturalism
 
Creationism vs evolution
Creationism vs evolutionCreationism vs evolution
Creationism vs evolution
 
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...
Class # 4 Sunday May 3rd. Does Absoulte Truth Exist? A Basic Guide to Christi...
 
Sample PPT from College
Sample PPT from CollegeSample PPT from College
Sample PPT from College
 
Evolutionary epistemology versus faith and justified true belief: Does scien...
Evolutionary epistemology versus faith and justified true belief:  Does scien...Evolutionary epistemology versus faith and justified true belief:  Does scien...
Evolutionary epistemology versus faith and justified true belief: Does scien...
 

Mais de KenBoa.org

Science, faith, and reason full
Science, faith, and reason fullScience, faith, and reason full
Science, faith, and reason fullKenBoa.org
 
Origin, Purpose, and Destiny
Origin, Purpose, and DestinyOrigin, Purpose, and Destiny
Origin, Purpose, and DestinyKenBoa.org
 
Love and Marriage
Love and MarriageLove and Marriage
Love and MarriageKenBoa.org
 
The Seven Feasts of Israel
The Seven Feasts of IsraelThe Seven Feasts of Israel
The Seven Feasts of IsraelKenBoa.org
 
A Biblical View of Work
A Biblical View of WorkA Biblical View of Work
A Biblical View of WorkKenBoa.org
 
Intelligent Design - The Modern Challenge to Darwinism
Intelligent Design - The Modern Challenge to DarwinismIntelligent Design - The Modern Challenge to Darwinism
Intelligent Design - The Modern Challenge to DarwinismKenBoa.org
 
Is There Really a God? Does God Exist?
Is There Really a God? Does God Exist?Is There Really a God? Does God Exist?
Is There Really a God? Does God Exist?KenBoa.org
 
The Great Divorce
The Great Divorce The Great Divorce
The Great Divorce KenBoa.org
 
Paradigm Spirituality
Paradigm SpiritualityParadigm Spirituality
Paradigm SpiritualityKenBoa.org
 
The Book of Daniel, Part 1 of 2
The Book of Daniel, Part 1 of 2The Book of Daniel, Part 1 of 2
The Book of Daniel, Part 1 of 2KenBoa.org
 
Discerning the Will of God
Discerning the Will of God Discerning the Will of God
Discerning the Will of God KenBoa.org
 
The Book of Daniel, Part 2 of 2
The Book of Daniel, Part 2 of 2The Book of Daniel, Part 2 of 2
The Book of Daniel, Part 2 of 2KenBoa.org
 
Why Do the Innocent Suffer
Why Do the Innocent SufferWhy Do the Innocent Suffer
Why Do the Innocent SufferKenBoa.org
 
Teaching Approaches
Teaching ApproachesTeaching Approaches
Teaching ApproachesKenBoa.org
 
Spiritual Formation Overview
Spiritual Formation Overview Spiritual Formation Overview
Spiritual Formation Overview KenBoa.org
 
Spirit-Filled Spirituality
Spirit-Filled SpiritualitySpirit-Filled Spirituality
Spirit-Filled SpiritualityKenBoa.org
 
Sacred/Secular Myth
Sacred/Secular MythSacred/Secular Myth
Sacred/Secular MythKenBoa.org
 
Relational Spirituality
Relational SpiritualityRelational Spirituality
Relational SpiritualityKenBoa.org
 
Process Spirituality
Process SpiritualityProcess Spirituality
Process SpiritualityKenBoa.org
 
Origin, Purpose, and Destiny
Origin, Purpose, and DestinyOrigin, Purpose, and Destiny
Origin, Purpose, and DestinyKenBoa.org
 

Mais de KenBoa.org (20)

Science, faith, and reason full
Science, faith, and reason fullScience, faith, and reason full
Science, faith, and reason full
 
Origin, Purpose, and Destiny
Origin, Purpose, and DestinyOrigin, Purpose, and Destiny
Origin, Purpose, and Destiny
 
Love and Marriage
Love and MarriageLove and Marriage
Love and Marriage
 
The Seven Feasts of Israel
The Seven Feasts of IsraelThe Seven Feasts of Israel
The Seven Feasts of Israel
 
A Biblical View of Work
A Biblical View of WorkA Biblical View of Work
A Biblical View of Work
 
Intelligent Design - The Modern Challenge to Darwinism
Intelligent Design - The Modern Challenge to DarwinismIntelligent Design - The Modern Challenge to Darwinism
Intelligent Design - The Modern Challenge to Darwinism
 
Is There Really a God? Does God Exist?
Is There Really a God? Does God Exist?Is There Really a God? Does God Exist?
Is There Really a God? Does God Exist?
 
The Great Divorce
The Great Divorce The Great Divorce
The Great Divorce
 
Paradigm Spirituality
Paradigm SpiritualityParadigm Spirituality
Paradigm Spirituality
 
The Book of Daniel, Part 1 of 2
The Book of Daniel, Part 1 of 2The Book of Daniel, Part 1 of 2
The Book of Daniel, Part 1 of 2
 
Discerning the Will of God
Discerning the Will of God Discerning the Will of God
Discerning the Will of God
 
The Book of Daniel, Part 2 of 2
The Book of Daniel, Part 2 of 2The Book of Daniel, Part 2 of 2
The Book of Daniel, Part 2 of 2
 
Why Do the Innocent Suffer
Why Do the Innocent SufferWhy Do the Innocent Suffer
Why Do the Innocent Suffer
 
Teaching Approaches
Teaching ApproachesTeaching Approaches
Teaching Approaches
 
Spiritual Formation Overview
Spiritual Formation Overview Spiritual Formation Overview
Spiritual Formation Overview
 
Spirit-Filled Spirituality
Spirit-Filled SpiritualitySpirit-Filled Spirituality
Spirit-Filled Spirituality
 
Sacred/Secular Myth
Sacred/Secular MythSacred/Secular Myth
Sacred/Secular Myth
 
Relational Spirituality
Relational SpiritualityRelational Spirituality
Relational Spirituality
 
Process Spirituality
Process SpiritualityProcess Spirituality
Process Spirituality
 
Origin, Purpose, and Destiny
Origin, Purpose, and DestinyOrigin, Purpose, and Destiny
Origin, Purpose, and Destiny
 

Último

madina book to learn arabic part1
madina   book   to  learn  arabic  part1madina   book   to  learn  arabic  part1
madina book to learn arabic part1fa3el khair
 
Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...anilsa9823
 
Genesis 1:10 || Meditate the Scripture daily verse by verse
Genesis 1:10  ||  Meditate the Scripture daily verse by verseGenesis 1:10  ||  Meditate the Scripture daily verse by verse
Genesis 1:10 || Meditate the Scripture daily verse by versemaricelcanoynuay
 
VIP mohali Call Girl 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our Escorts
VIP mohali Call Girl 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our EscortsVIP mohali Call Girl 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our Escorts
VIP mohali Call Girl 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our Escortssonatiwari757
 
call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️soniya singh
 
Study of the Psalms Chapter 1 verse 2 - wanderean
Study of the Psalms Chapter 1 verse 2 - wandereanStudy of the Psalms Chapter 1 verse 2 - wanderean
Study of the Psalms Chapter 1 verse 2 - wandereanmaricelcanoynuay
 
Part 1 of the Holy Quran- Alif Laam Meem
Part 1 of the Holy Quran- Alif Laam MeemPart 1 of the Holy Quran- Alif Laam Meem
Part 1 of the Holy Quran- Alif Laam MeemAbdullahMohammed282920
 
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Nishatganj Lucknow best Female service 🕶
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Nishatganj Lucknow best Female service  🕶CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Nishatganj Lucknow best Female service  🕶
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Nishatganj Lucknow best Female service 🕶anilsa9823
 
Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️soniya singh
 
Pradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun Jani
Pradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun JaniPradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun Jani
Pradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun JaniPradeep Bhanot
 
Flores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understand
Flores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understandFlores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understand
Flores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understandvillamilcecil909
 
Authentic Black magic, Kala ilam expert in UAE and Kala ilam specialist in S...
Authentic Black magic, Kala ilam expert in UAE  and Kala ilam specialist in S...Authentic Black magic, Kala ilam expert in UAE  and Kala ilam specialist in S...
Authentic Black magic, Kala ilam expert in UAE and Kala ilam specialist in S...baharayali
 
Elite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCR
Elite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCRElite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCR
Elite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCRDelhi Call girls
 
Lucknow 💋 Call Girls Lucknow - Book 8923113531 Call Girls Available 24 Hours ...
Lucknow 💋 Call Girls Lucknow - Book 8923113531 Call Girls Available 24 Hours ...Lucknow 💋 Call Girls Lucknow - Book 8923113531 Call Girls Available 24 Hours ...
Lucknow 💋 Call Girls Lucknow - Book 8923113531 Call Girls Available 24 Hours ...anilsa9823
 
St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024
St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024
St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024Chris Lyne
 
Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 5 5 24
Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 5 5 24Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 5 5 24
Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 5 5 24deerfootcoc
 
Lesson 3 - Heaven - the Christian's Destiny.pptx
Lesson 3 - Heaven - the Christian's Destiny.pptxLesson 3 - Heaven - the Christian's Destiny.pptx
Lesson 3 - Heaven - the Christian's Destiny.pptxCelso Napoleon
 

Último (20)

Call Girls In Nehru Place 📱 9999965857 🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SERVICE
Call Girls In Nehru Place 📱  9999965857  🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SERVICECall Girls In Nehru Place 📱  9999965857  🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SERVICE
Call Girls In Nehru Place 📱 9999965857 🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SERVICE
 
madina book to learn arabic part1
madina   book   to  learn  arabic  part1madina   book   to  learn  arabic  part1
madina book to learn arabic part1
 
Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
 
Genesis 1:10 || Meditate the Scripture daily verse by verse
Genesis 1:10  ||  Meditate the Scripture daily verse by verseGenesis 1:10  ||  Meditate the Scripture daily verse by verse
Genesis 1:10 || Meditate the Scripture daily verse by verse
 
VIP mohali Call Girl 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our Escorts
VIP mohali Call Girl 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our EscortsVIP mohali Call Girl 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our Escorts
VIP mohali Call Girl 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our Escorts
 
call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
 
Study of the Psalms Chapter 1 verse 2 - wanderean
Study of the Psalms Chapter 1 verse 2 - wandereanStudy of the Psalms Chapter 1 verse 2 - wanderean
Study of the Psalms Chapter 1 verse 2 - wanderean
 
Part 1 of the Holy Quran- Alif Laam Meem
Part 1 of the Holy Quran- Alif Laam MeemPart 1 of the Holy Quran- Alif Laam Meem
Part 1 of the Holy Quran- Alif Laam Meem
 
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Nishatganj Lucknow best Female service 🕶
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Nishatganj Lucknow best Female service  🕶CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Nishatganj Lucknow best Female service  🕶
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Nishatganj Lucknow best Female service 🕶
 
Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
 
Pradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun Jani
Pradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun JaniPradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun Jani
Pradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun Jani
 
Flores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understand
Flores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understandFlores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understand
Flores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understand
 
Authentic Black magic, Kala ilam expert in UAE and Kala ilam specialist in S...
Authentic Black magic, Kala ilam expert in UAE  and Kala ilam specialist in S...Authentic Black magic, Kala ilam expert in UAE  and Kala ilam specialist in S...
Authentic Black magic, Kala ilam expert in UAE and Kala ilam specialist in S...
 
Elite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCR
Elite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCRElite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCR
Elite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCR
 
Lucknow 💋 Call Girls Lucknow - Book 8923113531 Call Girls Available 24 Hours ...
Lucknow 💋 Call Girls Lucknow - Book 8923113531 Call Girls Available 24 Hours ...Lucknow 💋 Call Girls Lucknow - Book 8923113531 Call Girls Available 24 Hours ...
Lucknow 💋 Call Girls Lucknow - Book 8923113531 Call Girls Available 24 Hours ...
 
St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024
St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024
St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024
 
Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 5 5 24
Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 5 5 24Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 5 5 24
Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 5 5 24
 
Call Girls In CP 📱 9999965857 🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SERVICE
Call Girls In CP 📱  9999965857  🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SERVICECall Girls In CP 📱  9999965857  🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SERVICE
Call Girls In CP 📱 9999965857 🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SERVICE
 
English - The Forgotten Books of Eden.pdf
English - The Forgotten Books of Eden.pdfEnglish - The Forgotten Books of Eden.pdf
English - The Forgotten Books of Eden.pdf
 
Lesson 3 - Heaven - the Christian's Destiny.pptx
Lesson 3 - Heaven - the Christian's Destiny.pptxLesson 3 - Heaven - the Christian's Destiny.pptx
Lesson 3 - Heaven - the Christian's Destiny.pptx
 

Why Believe in Miracles?

  • 1. Why Believe in Miracles? © Dr. Ken Boa and Bill Ibsen 2007. All Rights Reserved. 1
  • 2. Why Believe in Miracles? 2
  • 3. Why Believe in Miracles? How can a rational person today accept the stories of miracles in the Bible? 2
  • 4. Why Believe in Miracles? How can a rational person today accept the stories of miracles in the Bible? Aren't miracles contrary to the laws of modern science? 2
  • 5. Why Believe in Miracles? How can a rational person today accept the stories of miracles in the Bible? Aren't miracles contrary to the laws of modern science? There is no historical basis for the miracles in the Bible — aren't they simply myths and legends designed to create religious faith? 2
  • 6. Why Believe in Miracles? How can a rational person today accept the stories of miracles in the Bible? Aren't miracles contrary to the laws of modern science? There is no historical basis for the miracles in the Bible — aren't they simply myths and legends designed to create religious faith? If there were miracles then, why doesn’t God perform miracles today? 2
  • 7. Why Believe in Miracles? 3
  • 8. Why Believe in Miracles? Option I: Miracles Are Not Possible 3
  • 9. Why Believe in Miracles? Option I: Miracles Are Not Possible Option II: Miracles Are Possible But May Not Have Occurred 3
  • 10. Why Believe in Miracles? Option I: Miracles Are Not Possible Option II: Miracles Are Possible But May Not Have Occurred Option III: Miracles Have Occurred 3
  • 11. Why Believe in Miracles? Option I: Miracles Are Not Possible Option II: Miracles Are Possible But May Not Have Occurred Option III: Miracles Have Occurred Appendix: The Resurrection 3
  • 12. Three Options Have Miracles Occurred? 4
  • 13. Three Options Have Miracles Occurred? No 4
  • 14. Three Options Have Miracles Occurred? No Maybe 4
  • 15. Three Options Have Miracles Occurred? No Maybe Yes 4
  • 16. Miracles: A Uniqueness of Christianity Hindu Temple Buddhist Temple Egyptian Mosque 5
  • 17. Miracles: A Uniqueness of Christianity Christian teachings are built directly upon God's miraculous acts Hindu Temple Buddhist Temple Egyptian Mosque 5
  • 18. Miracles: A Uniqueness of Christianity Christian teachings are built directly upon God's miraculous acts Very few accounts of miracles exist in other religions Hindu Temple Buddhist Temple Egyptian Mosque 5
  • 19. Miracles: A Uniqueness of Christianity Christian teachings are built directly upon God's miraculous acts Very few accounts of miracles exist in other religions Christianity stands or falls with the historicity of miracles Hindu Temple Buddhist Temple Egyptian Mosque 5
  • 20. Option I: Miracles Are Not Possible 6
  • 22. Philosophy of Naturalism The universe operates according to uniform natural causes 7
  • 23. Philosophy of Naturalism The universe operates according to uniform natural causes Closed system 7
  • 24. Philosophy of Naturalism The universe operates according to uniform natural causes Closed system Anti-supernatural assumption 7
  • 25. Hume’s Denial of Miracles David Hume (1711-1776) 8
  • 26. Hume’s Denial of Miracles Held that no amount of evidence can establish that a miracle has occurred David Hume (1711-1776) 8
  • 27. Hume’s Denial of Miracles Held that no amount of evidence can establish that a miracle has occurred The uniformity of natural law is supported by the uniform experience of men against the occurrence of miracles David Hume (1711-1776) 8
  • 28. Hume’s Denial of Miracles Held that no amount of evidence can establish that a miracle has occurred The uniformity of natural law is supported by the uniform experience of men against the occurrence of miracles Documented reports of miracles David Hume (1711-1776) 8
  • 29. Hume’s Denial of Miracles Held that no amount of evidence can establish that a miracle has occurred The uniformity of natural law is supported by the uniform experience of men against the occurrence of miracles Documented reports of miracles Circular reasoning David Hume (1711-1776) 8
  • 30. Hume’s Denial of Miracles Held that no amount of evidence can establish that a miracle has occurred The uniformity of natural law is supported by the uniform experience of men against the occurrence of miracles Documented reports of miracles Circular reasoning Pre-determining the verdict David Hume (1711-1776) 8
  • 32. The Anti-Supernatural Assumption A presupposition that God either does not exist or cannot directly intrude into the historical process 9
  • 33. The Anti-Supernatural Assumption A presupposition that God either does not exist or cannot directly intrude into the historical process A metaphysical (philosophic), not scientific position 9
  • 34. The Anti-Supernatural Assumption A presupposition that God either does not exist or cannot directly intrude into the historical process A metaphysical (philosophic), not scientific position Science is limited in its scope to the study of natural phenomena, especially that which is repeatable 9
  • 35. The Anti-Supernatural Assumption A presupposition that God either does not exist or cannot directly intrude into the historical process A metaphysical (philosophic), not scientific position Science is limited in its scope to the study of natural phenomena, especially that which is repeatable Degeneration of science into scientism 9
  • 36. The Anti-Supernatural Assumption A presupposition that God either does not exist or cannot directly intrude into the historical process A metaphysical (philosophic), not scientific position Science is limited in its scope to the study of natural phenomena, especially that which is repeatable Degeneration of science into scientism Science is descriptive, not prescriptive 9
  • 37. The Nature of Miracles 10
  • 38. The Nature of Miracles Empowered by something higher than nature 10
  • 39. The Nature of Miracles Empowered by something higher than nature Supersede the ordinary processes or laws of nature 10
  • 40. The Nature of Miracles Empowered by something higher than nature Supersede the ordinary processes or laws of nature A higher principle overcomes a lower principle 10
  • 41. The Nature of Miracles Empowered by something higher than nature Supersede the ordinary processes or laws of nature A higher principle overcomes a lower principle Force of Gravity 10
  • 42. The Nature of Miracles Empowered by something higher than nature Supersede the ordinary processes or laws of nature A higher principle overcomes a lower principle Force of Gravity Force of Aerodynamics 10
  • 43. Stunt planes close hover 11
  • 44. To claim that miracles violate or contradict natural laws Stunt planes close hover 11
  • 45. To claim that miracles violate or contradict natural laws is just as improper as to say that the principle of aerodynamics violates the law of gravity. Stunt planes close hover 11
  • 46. Miracles and the Supernatural 12
  • 47. Miracles and the Supernatural Miracles are accomplished by a supernatural agency 12
  • 48. Miracles and the Supernatural Miracles are accomplished by a supernatural agency No natural explanation for how they happen 12
  • 49. Miracles and the Supernatural Miracles are accomplished by a supernatural agency No natural explanation for how they happen Our inability to explain them certainly does not mean, therefore, that they cannot occur 12
  • 50. Miracles and the Supernatural Miracles are accomplished by a supernatural agency No natural explanation for how they happen Our inability to explain them certainly does not mean, therefore, that they cannot occur Inexplainable non-miraculous phenomena exist 12
  • 51. Miracles and the Supernatural Miracles are accomplished by a supernatural agency No natural explanation for how they happen Our inability to explain them certainly does not mean, therefore, that they cannot occur Inexplainable non-miraculous Total phenomena exist Liquefaction in Metamorphosis 12
  • 53. Another Scientific Objection “Miracles destroy the regularity of nature” 13
  • 54. Another Scientific Objection “Miracles destroy the regularity of nature” Misunderstanding of the biblical teaching on miracles 13
  • 55. Another Scientific Objection “Miracles destroy the regularity of nature” Misunderstanding of the biblical teaching on miracles God has instituted “laws of nature” but is not bound by them 13
  • 56. Another Scientific Objection “Miracles destroy the regularity of nature” Misunderstanding of the biblical teaching on miracles God has instituted “laws of nature” but is not bound by them These sovereign interventions or miracles are unusual, not commonplace events 13
  • 57. Another Scientific Objection “Miracles destroy the regularity of nature” Misunderstanding of the biblical teaching on miracles God has instituted “laws of nature” but is not bound by them These sovereign interventions or miracles are unusual, not commonplace events Miracles by definition must be unique and extraordinary 13
  • 58. Scientific inquiry is not threatened by the occurrence of miracles, 14
  • 59. Scientific inquiry is not threatened by the occurrence of miracles, because they are by definition unusual events 14
  • 60. Scientific inquiry is not threatened by the occurrence of miracles, because they are by definition unusual events that involve a very brief suspension of the normal processes of nature 14
  • 61. Scientific inquiry is not threatened by the occurrence of miracles, because they are by definition unusual events that involve a very brief suspension of the normal processes of nature by a higher power 14
  • 62. Nature Is Amazing, But Not Miraculous 15
  • 63. Nature Is Amazing, But Not Miraculous God’s handiwork in nature is mysterious and wonderful, but not miraculous 15
  • 64. Nature Is Amazing, But Not Miraculous God’s handiwork in nature is mysterious and wonderful, but not miraculous Dilution of the concept of miracles 15
  • 65. Nature Is Amazing, But Not Miraculous God’s handiwork in nature is mysterious and wonderful, but not miraculous Dilution of the concept of miracles Miracle: a phenomenon that occurs in space-time history that is so radically different from the ordinary operations of nature that its observers are justified in attributing it to the direct intervention of a supernatural agent 15
  • 66. Brief Time Clusters of Miracles 16
  • 67. Brief Time Clusters of Miracles Moses and Joshua 16
  • 68. Brief Time Clusters of Miracles Moses Elijah and and Joshua Elisha 16
  • 69. Brief Time Clusters of Miracles Moses Elijah Christ and and and the Joshua Elisha Apostles 16
  • 70. Brief Time Clusters of Miracles Moses Elijah Christ and and and the Joshua Elisha Apostles LAW 16
  • 71. Brief Time Clusters of Miracles Moses Elijah Christ and and and the Joshua Elisha Apostles LAW PROPHETS 16
  • 72. Brief Time Clusters of Miracles Moses Elijah Christ and and and the Joshua Elisha Apostles NEW LAW PROPHETS TESTAMENT 16
  • 73. Brief Time Clusters of Miracles Moses Elijah Christ and and and the Joshua Elisha Apostles c. 540 years NEW LAW PROPHETS TESTAMENT 16
  • 74. Brief Time Clusters of Miracles Moses Elijah Christ and and and the Joshua Elisha Apostles c. 540 c. 830 years years NEW LAW PROPHETS TESTAMENT 16
  • 75. Brief Time Clusters of Miracles Moses Elijah Christ and and and the Joshua Elisha Apostles c. 540 c. 830 years years NEW LAW PROPHETS TESTAMENT The Bible is not a record of one miracle after another; its miracles were profound singular events 16
  • 77. Objections Philosophical 17
  • 78. Objections Scientific Philosophical 17
  • 79. Objections Scientific Philosophical Exi st? G od Do es 17
  • 80. The Idea of Miracles Is Relative, Not Absolute 18
  • 81. The Idea of Miracles Is Relative, Not Absolute To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and omniscience 18
  • 82. The Idea of Miracles Is Relative, Not Absolute To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and omniscience There is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised 18
  • 83. The Idea of Miracles Is Relative, Not Absolute To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and omniscience There is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised Edwin Abbott’s story Flatland ,1884 18
  • 84. The Idea of Miracles Is Relative, Not Absolute To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and omniscience There is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised A. Square Edwin Abbott’s story Flatland ,1884 18
  • 85. The Idea of Miracles Is Relative, Not Absolute To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and omniscience There is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised A. Square Edwin Abbott’s story Flatland ,1884 18
  • 86. The Idea of Miracles Is Relative, Not Absolute To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and omniscience There is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised A. Square Edwin Abbott’s story Flatland ,1884 18
  • 87. The Idea of Miracles Is Relative, Not Absolute To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and omniscience There is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised A. Square Edwin Abbott’s story Flatland ,1884 18
  • 88. Key Issue: Does God Exist? 19
  • 89. Key Issue: Does God Exist? If God created the universe, there is a supernatural dimension to reality, and this means that miracles are possible 19
  • 90. Key Issue: Does God Exist? If God created the universe, there is a supernatural dimension to reality, and this means that miracles are possible Now the question is not one of philosophy but of history 19
  • 91. Key Issue: Does God Exist? If God created the universe, there is a supernatural dimension to reality, and this means that miracles are possible Now the question is not one of philosophy but of history Miracles are possible, but is there enough evidence to show that any have happened? 19
  • 92. Option II: Miracles Are Possible But May Not Have Occurred 20
  • 93. Has God Miraculously Intervened in Human Affairs? Luke 24:1, The Book of Kells, c.A.D. 800 21
  • 94. Has God Miraculously Intervened in Human Affairs? Speculation will never settle the question; must use historical evidence Luke 24:1, The Book of Kells, c.A.D. 800 21
  • 95. Has God Miraculously Intervened in Human Affairs? Speculation will never settle the question; must use historical evidence God used history as His means of revealing His character and redemptive program Luke 24:1, The Book of Kells, c.A.D. 800 21
  • 96. Has God Miraculously Intervened in Human Affairs? Speculation will never settle the question; must use historical evidence God used history as His means of revealing His character and redemptive program Abundant geographic and chronological documentation ties God's revelation to the real world Luke 24:1, The Book of Kells, c.A.D. 800 21
  • 97. The Reliability of the Bible Lindisfarne Gospel of Matthew, 7-8th C 22
  • 98. The Reliability of the Bible Not a fabric of myths or fairy tales Lindisfarne Gospel of Matthew, 7-8th C 22
  • 99. The Reliability of the Bible Not a fabric of myths or fairy tales Dates and locations of events, often relating them to the affairs of other nations Lindisfarne Gospel of Matthew, 7-8th C 22
  • 100. The Reliability of the Bible Not a fabric of myths or fairy tales Dates and locations of events, often relating them to the affairs of other nations Miracles recorded with same attention as nonmiraculous events Lindisfarne Gospel of Matthew, 7-8th C 22
  • 101. The Reliability of the Bible Not a fabric of myths or fairy tales Dates and locations of events, often relating them to the affairs of other nations Miracles recorded with same attention as nonmiraculous events Unlike scriptures of other religions Lindisfarne Gospel of Matthew, 7-8th C 22
  • 102. Key Point Luke 3:22-26, The Book of Kells, c.A.D. 800 23
  • 103. Key Point The miracles of Christ can be subjected to historical scrutiny Luke 3:22-26, The Book of Kells, c.A.D. 800 23
  • 104. Key Point The miracles of Christ can be subjected to historical scrutiny because of the reliability of the New Testament documents Luke 3:22-26, The Book of Kells, c.A.D. 800 23
  • 105. Miracles: Beneath God’s Dignity? The Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes, Lambert Lombard, c. 1550 24
  • 106. Miracles: Beneath God’s Dignity? The sovereign God who created nature uses nature to manifest Himself to humanity The Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes, Lambert Lombard, c. 1550 24
  • 107. Miracles: Beneath God’s Dignity? The sovereign God who created nature uses nature to manifest Himself to humanity God’s personal revelation in Jesus Christ The Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes, Lambert Lombard, c. 1550 24
  • 108. Miracles: Beneath God’s Dignity? The sovereign God who created nature uses nature to manifest Himself to humanity God’s personal revelation in Jesus Christ Accomplished more miracles than any other man The Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes, Lambert Lombard, c. 1550 24
  • 109. Special Revelation The Marriage at Cana, David Girard, c.1500, The Louvre 25
  • 110. Special Revelation General revelation (natural theology) is too limited and too speculative The Marriage at Cana, David Girard, c.1500, The Louvre 25
  • 111. Special Revelation General revelation (natural theology) is too limited and too speculative Special revelation includes miraculous events The Marriage at Cana, David Girard, c.1500, The Louvre 25
  • 112. Special Revelation General revelation (natural theology) is too limited and too speculative Special revelation includes miraculous events Improper to rule out the occurrence of miracles without an open investigation of these historical reports The Marriage at Cana, David Girard, c.1500, The Louvre 25
  • 113. The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles Healing Jairus’ Daughter, Ilja Repin, 1871, St. Petersburg 26
  • 114. The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles 4 Gospels record 35 of Jesus’ many miracles Healing Jairus’ Daughter, Ilja Repin, 1871, St. Petersburg 26
  • 115. The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles 4 Gospels record 35 of Jesus’ many miracles Jesus demonstrated authority over nature, disease, demons, and death Healing Jairus’ Daughter, Ilja Repin, 1871, St. Petersburg 26
  • 116. The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles 4 Gospels record 35 of Jesus’ many miracles Jesus demonstrated authority over nature, disease, demons, and death Redemptive purpose Healing Jairus’ Daughter, Ilja Repin, 1871, St. Petersburg 26
  • 117. The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles 4 Gospels record 35 of Jesus’ many miracles Jesus demonstrated authority over nature, disease, demons, and death Redemptive purpose Accomplished with great restraint Healing Jairus’ Daughter, Ilja Repin, 1871, St. Petersburg 26
  • 118. The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles 4 Gospels record 35 of Jesus’ many miracles Jesus demonstrated authority over nature, disease, demons, and death Redemptive purpose Accomplished with great restraint Healing Jairus’ Daughter, Ilja Repin, 1871, St. Petersburg Publicly done 26
  • 119. The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles The Raising of Lazarus, Carvaggio, c.1609, Messina, Italy 27
  • 120. The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles Often hostile eyewitnesses present The Raising of Lazarus, Carvaggio, c.1609, Messina, Italy 27
  • 121. The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles Often hostile eyewitnesses present None of Christ's critics ever denied that He performed these miracles The Raising of Lazarus, Carvaggio, c.1609, Messina, Italy 27
  • 122. The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles Often hostile eyewitnesses present None of Christ's critics ever denied that He performed these miracles His miracles set Him apart from the founders and leaders of other world religions The Raising of Lazarus, Carvaggio, c.1609, Messina, Italy 27
  • 123. The Historicity of Jesus’ Miracles Often hostile eyewitnesses present None of Christ's critics ever denied that He performed these miracles His miracles set Him apart from the founders and leaders of other world religions Attempts to discredit His miracles by offering natural explanations for His supernatural accomplishments The Raising of Lazarus, Carvaggio, c.1609, Messina, Italy 27
  • 124. The Greatest Miracle: Jesus’ Resurrection Pietro Lorenzetti, Resurrection, c.1320 Fresco, San Francesco, Assisi 28
  • 125. The Greatest Miracle: Jesus’ Resurrection "The sign of Jonah the prophet" (the Resurrection; Matt. 12:39-40) Pietro Lorenzetti, Resurrection, c.1320 Fresco, San Francesco, Assisi 28
  • 126. The Greatest Miracle: Jesus’ Resurrection "The sign of Jonah the prophet" (the Resurrection; Matt. 12:39-40) "Why believe in miracles?" The Resurrection Pietro Lorenzetti, Resurrection, c.1320 Fresco, San Francesco, Assisi 28
  • 127. The Greatest Miracle: Jesus’ Resurrection "The sign of Jonah the prophet" (the Resurrection; Matt. 12:39-40) "Why believe in miracles?" The Resurrection Abundant historical evidence Pietro Lorenzetti, Resurrection, c.1320 Fresco, San Francesco, Assisi 28
  • 128. Option III: Miracles Are Possible 29
  • 129. Responding in Faith Albrecht Altdorfer, The Resurrection of Christ, c.1516, Vienna 30
  • 130. Responding in Faith Many believe in the Resurrection and miracles yet still refuse to place their trust in Christ Albrecht Altdorfer, The Resurrection of Christ, c.1516, Vienna 30
  • 131. Responding in Faith Many believe in the Resurrection and miracles yet still refuse to place their trust in Christ Eyewitnesses also didn’t always respond with faith Albrecht Altdorfer, The Resurrection of Christ, c.1516, Vienna 30
  • 132. Responding in Faith Many believe in the Resurrection and miracles yet still refuse to place their trust in Christ Eyewitnesses also didn’t always respond with faith The heart of an unregenerate person is at enmity with God and refuses to bow to His revelation and authority Albrecht Altdorfer, The Resurrection of Christ, c.1516, Vienna 30
  • 133. Responding in Faith Many believe in the Resurrection and miracles yet still refuse to place their trust in Christ Eyewitnesses also didn’t always respond with faith The heart of an unregenerate person is at enmity with God and refuses to bow to His revelation and authority Only the Holy Spirit can convict of sin Albrecht Altdorfer, The Resurrection of Christ, c.1516, Vienna 30
  • 134. Objection: His Revelation Is Too Remote 31
  • 135. Objection: His Revelation Is Too Remote “If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a more direct way” 31
  • 136. Objection: His Revelation Is Too Remote “If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a more direct way” Objector wants God to clobber him into the kingdom by forcing him to believe 31
  • 137. Objection: His Revelation Is Too Remote “If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a more direct way” Objector wants God to clobber him into the kingdom by forcing him to believe "Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us" (John 14:8) 31
  • 138. Objection: His Revelation Is Too Remote “If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a more direct way” Objector wants God to clobber him into the kingdom by forcing him to believe "Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us" (John 14:8) God has done enough 31
  • 139. Objection: His Revelation Is Too Remote “If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a more direct way” Objector wants God to clobber him into the kingdom by forcing him to believe "Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us" (John 14:8) God has done enough Second Coming: Judgment, not an offer of salvation 31
  • 140. Miracles: Catalysts, not Creators of Faith 32
  • 141. Miracles: Catalysts, not Creators of Faith Miracles cannot create faith, but they can be used by the Holy Spirit as catalysts to faith 32
  • 142. Miracles: Catalysts, not Creators of Faith Miracles cannot create faith, but they can be used by the Holy Spirit as catalysts to faith Christ's miracles (especially the Resurrection) demonstrate the validity of His claims 32
  • 143. Miracles: Catalysts, not Creators of Faith Miracles cannot create faith, but they can be used by the Holy Spirit as catalysts to faith Christ's miracles (especially the Resurrection) demonstrate the validity of His claims Profound implications for the eternal destiny of every human being 32
  • 145. Significance of the Resurrection A pillar supporting the Christian faith 34
  • 146. "If Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins. Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. If we have hoped in Christ in this life only, we are of all men most to be pitied" (1 Cor. 15:17-19) 35
  • 147. Significance of the Resurrection A pillar supporting the Christian faith 36
  • 148. Significance of the Resurrection A pillar supporting the Christian faith Apostles preaching revolved around the Resurrection (e.g., Acts 1:22; 2:24-32; 3:15) 36
  • 149. Significance of the Resurrection A pillar supporting the Christian faith Apostles preaching revolved around the Resurrection (e.g., Acts 1:22; 2:24-32; 3:15) Without the resurrection of Christ, Christianity would be unable to withstand critical attacks 36
  • 155. Historical Facts Hans Holbein the Younger (1497-1543) The Passion Oil on limewood, 1524-1525 Kunstmuseum, Öffentliche Kunstsammlung, Basle 38
  • 156. Historical Facts The facts are well grounded in historical and critical procedures Hans Holbein the Younger (1497-1543) The Passion Oil on limewood, 1524-1525 Kunstmuseum, Öffentliche Kunstsammlung, Basle 38
  • 157. Historical Facts The facts are well grounded in historical and critical procedures Today the consensus of scholarship acknowledges the historicity of these facts Hans Holbein the Younger (1497-1543) The Passion Oil on limewood, 1524-1525 Kunstmuseum, Öffentliche Kunstsammlung, Basle 38
  • 158. Historical Facts The facts are well grounded in historical and critical procedures Today the consensus of scholarship acknowledges the historicity of these facts Disagree on the inspiration of Scripture Hans Holbein the Younger (1497-1543) The Passion Oil on limewood, 1524-1525 Kunstmuseum, Öffentliche Kunstsammlung, Basle 38
  • 159. Historical Facts The facts are well grounded in historical and critical procedures Today the consensus of scholarship acknowledges the historicity of these facts Disagree on the inspiration of Scripture Disagree on the interpretation of this historical data Hans Holbein the Younger (1497-1543) The Passion Oil on limewood, 1524-1525 Kunstmuseum, Öffentliche Kunstsammlung, Basle 38
  • 160. Historical Facts The facts are well grounded in historical and critical procedures Today the consensus of scholarship acknowledges the historicity of these facts Disagree on the inspiration of Scripture Disagree on the interpretation of this historical data Hans Holbein the Younger (1497-1543) The Passion Oil on limewood, 1524-1525 Pre-resurrection and Post- Kunstmuseum, Öffentliche Kunstsammlung, Basle resurrection facts 38
  • 161. 1. Jesus Was Tortured and Crucified The Flagellation of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Adolphe Bougeureau, 1880, La Rochelle 39
  • 162. 1. Jesus Was Tortured and Crucified The Flagellation of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Adolphe Bougeureau, 1880, La Rochelle Endured 6 trials 39
  • 163. 1. Jesus Was Tortured and Crucified The Flagellation of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Adolphe Bougeureau, 1880, La Rochelle Endured 6 trials Tortured repeatedly 39
  • 164. 1. Jesus Was Tortured and Crucified The Flagellation of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Adolphe Bougeureau, 1880, La Rochelle Endured 6 trials Tortured repeatedly Carried His cross 39
  • 165. 1. Jesus Was Tortured and Crucified The Flagellation of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Adolphe Bougeureau, 1880, La Rochelle Endured 6 trials Tortured repeatedly Carried His cross Physically nailed to the cross 39
  • 166. 1. Jesus Was Tortured and Crucified The Flagellation of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Adolphe Bougeureau, 1880, La Rochelle Endured 6 trials Tortured repeatedly Carried His cross Physically nailed to the cross Speared to confirm his death 39
  • 167. 2. Jesus’ Body Was Placed In a Guarded Tomb The Entombment of Christ, Sisto Badalocchio, 1610, Rome 40
  • 168. 2. Jesus’ Body Was Placed In a Guarded Tomb Joseph of Arimathea's solid rock-hewn tomb The Entombment of Christ, Sisto Badalocchio, 1610, Rome 40
  • 169. 2. Jesus’ Body Was Placed In a Guarded Tomb Joseph of Arimathea's solid rock-hewn tomb Single entrance closed off with a massive stone The Entombment of Christ, Sisto Badalocchio, 1610, Rome 40
  • 170. 2. Jesus’ Body Was Placed In a Guarded Tomb Joseph of Arimathea's solid rock-hewn tomb Single entrance closed off with a massive stone Jesus' body bound in linen wrappings The Entombment of Christ, Sisto Badalocchio, 1610, Rome 40
  • 171. 2. Jesus’ Body Was Placed In a Guarded Tomb Joseph of Arimathea's solid rock-hewn tomb Single entrance closed off with a massive stone Jesus' body bound in linen wrappings Pilate ordered a guard of soldiers The Entombment of Christ, Sisto Badalocchio, 1610, Rome 40
  • 172. 2. Jesus’ Body Was Placed In a Guarded Tomb Joseph of Arimathea's solid rock-hewn tomb Single entrance closed off with a massive stone Jesus' body bound in linen wrappings Pilate ordered a guard of soldiers Roman seal certification The Entombment of Christ, Sisto Badalocchio, 1610, Rome 40
  • 173. 3. The Disciples Were Clearly Discouraged by Jesus’ Crucifixion The Entombment of Christ, Guercino, 1656, Chicago 41
  • 174. 3. The Disciples Were Clearly Discouraged by Jesus’ Crucifixion Entertained no hope that Jesus would rise from the dead (Luke 24) The Entombment of Christ, Guercino, 1656, Chicago 41
  • 175. 3. The Disciples Were Clearly Discouraged by Jesus’ Crucifixion Entertained no hope that Jesus would rise from the dead (Luke 24) Despite Jesus' repeated predictions of His resurrection The Entombment of Christ, Guercino, 1656, Chicago 41
  • 176. 4. Friends Found the Tomb Empty on the Third Day Resurrection - Morn, Herbert Gustave Schmalz, 1895 42
  • 177. 4. Friends Found the Tomb Empty on the Third Day Jesus' friend Mary Magdalene and other followers found the empty tomb Resurrection - Morn, Herbert Gustave Schmalz, 1895 42
  • 178. 4. Friends Found the Tomb Empty on the Third Day Jesus' friend Mary Magdalene and other followers found the empty tomb Fact clearly admitted even by Jesus' enemies Resurrection - Morn, Herbert Gustave Schmalz, 1895 42
  • 179. 4. Friends Found the Tomb Empty on the Third Day Jesus' friend Mary Magdalene and other followers found the empty tomb Fact clearly admitted even by Jesus' enemies Chief priests and elders bribed the guard to say that the body was stolen by His Resurrection - Morn, disciples (Matt. 28:11-15) Herbert Gustave Schmalz, 1895 42
  • 180. 4. Friends Found the Tomb Empty on the Third Day Jesus' friend Mary Magdalene and other followers found the empty tomb Fact clearly admitted even by Jesus' enemies Chief priests and elders bribed the guard to say that the body was stolen by His Resurrection - Morn, disciples (Matt. 28:11-15) Herbert Gustave Schmalz, 1895 Exhume the body 42
  • 181. 5. The Roman Seal Was Broken and the Large Stone Was Moved Away The Angel Is Opening Christ’s Tomb Benjamin Gerritsz. Cuyp, 1640, Budapest 43
  • 182. 6. The Guard Left the Empty Tomb and Reported The Resurrection Andrea Mantegna, Late 1400’s 44
  • 183. 6. The Guard Left the Empty Tomb and Reported Reported what had happened to the Chief Priests The Resurrection Andrea Mantegna, Late 1400’s 44
  • 184. 6. The Guard Left the Empty Tomb and Reported Reported what had happened to the Chief Priests Given a large bribe The Resurrection Andrea Mantegna, Late 1400’s 44
  • 185. 6. The Guard Left the Empty Tomb and Reported Reported what had happened to the Chief Priests Given a large bribe Promised protection from punishment/execution by Pilate The Resurrection Andrea Mantegna, Late 1400’s 44
  • 186. 7. Jesus’ Grave-clothes Were Found Empty Yet Undisturbed 45
  • 187. 7. Jesus’ Grave-clothes Were Found Empty Yet Undisturbed John 20:6-8 “So Peter and the other disciple went forth, and they were going to the tomb. 45
  • 188. 7. Jesus’ Grave-clothes Were Found Empty Yet Undisturbed John 20:6-8 “So Peter and the other disciple went forth, and they were going to the tomb. The two were running together; and the other disciple ran ahead faster than Peter and came to the tomb first; 45
  • 189. 7. Jesus’ Grave-clothes Were Found Empty Yet Undisturbed John 20:6-8 “So Peter and the other disciple went forth, and they were going to the tomb. The two were running together; and the other disciple ran ahead faster than Peter and came to the tomb first; and stooping and looking in, he saw the linen wrappings lying there; but he did not go in. 45
  • 190. 7. Jesus’ Grave-clothes Were Found Empty Yet Undisturbed John 20:6-8 “So Peter and the other disciple went forth, and they were going to the tomb. The two were running together; and the other disciple ran ahead faster than Peter and came to the tomb first; and stooping and looking in, he saw the linen wrappings lying there; but he did not go in. And so Simon Peter also came, following him, and entered the tomb; and he saw the linen wrappings lying there, 45
  • 191. 7. Jesus’ Grave-clothes Were Found Empty Yet Undisturbed John 20:6-8 “So Peter and the other disciple went forth, and they were going to the tomb. The two were running together; and the other disciple ran ahead faster than Peter and came to the tomb first; and stooping and looking in, he saw the linen wrappings lying there; but he did not go in. And so Simon Peter also came, following him, and entered the tomb; and he saw the linen wrappings lying there, and the face-cloth which had been on His head, not lying with the linen wrappings, but rolled up in a place by itself. 45
  • 192. 7. Jesus’ Grave-clothes Were Found Empty Yet Undisturbed John 20:6-8 “So Peter and the other disciple went forth, and they were going to the tomb. The two were running together; and the other disciple ran ahead faster than Peter and came to the tomb first; and stooping and looking in, he saw the linen wrappings lying there; but he did not go in. And so Simon Peter also came, following him, and entered the tomb; and he saw the linen wrappings lying there, and the face-cloth which had been on His head, not lying with the linen wrappings, but rolled up in a place by itself. So the other disciple who had first come to the tomb then also entered, and he saw and believed.” 45
  • 193. 8. Multiple Bodily Appearances of the Resurrected Jesus Christ Appearing to His Mother Rogier van der Weyden, c.1436 46
  • 194. 8. Multiple Bodily Appearances of the Resurrected Jesus Eyewitness accounts Christ Appearing to His Mother Rogier van der Weyden, c.1436 46
  • 195. 8. Multiple Bodily Appearances of the Resurrected Jesus Eyewitness accounts Variety of circumstances and people Christ Appearing to His Mother Rogier van der Weyden, c.1436 46
  • 196. 8. Multiple Bodily Appearances of the Resurrected Jesus Eyewitness accounts Variety of circumstances and people Appeared to >500 people once (1 Cor. 15:6) Christ Appearing to His Mother Rogier van der Weyden, c.1436 46
  • 197. 8. Multiple Bodily Appearances of the Resurrected Jesus Eyewitness accounts Variety of circumstances and people Appeared to >500 people once (1 Cor. 15:6) First witnesses were women Christ Appearing to His Mother Rogier van der Weyden, c.1436 46
  • 198. 8. Multiple Bodily Appearances of the Resurrected Jesus Eyewitness accounts Variety of circumstances and people Appeared to >500 people once (1 Cor. 15:6) First witnesses were women Appeared to James and Paul Christ Appearing to His Mother Rogier van der Weyden, c.1436 46
  • 199. 8. Multiple Bodily Appearances of the Resurrected Jesus Eyewitness accounts Variety of circumstances and people Appeared to >500 people once (1 Cor. 15:6) First witnesses were women Appeared to James and Paul Lives of witnesses radically Christ Appearing to His Mother transformed Rogier van der Weyden, c.1436 46
  • 200. Conclusions from the Historical Facts 47
  • 201. Conclusions from the Historical Facts These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians 47
  • 202. Conclusions from the Historical Facts These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians Can and have been interpreted in various ways to avoid the conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead 47
  • 203. Conclusions from the Historical Facts These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians Can and have been interpreted in various ways to avoid the conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead Naturalistic theories regarding the tomb and the appearances 47
  • 204. Conclusions from the Historical Facts These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians Can and have been interpreted in various ways to avoid the conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead Naturalistic theories regarding the tomb and the appearances All of these fail to explain the historical data 47
  • 205. Conclusions from the Historical Facts These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians Can and have been interpreted in various ways to avoid the conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead Naturalistic theories regarding the tomb and the appearances All of these fail to explain the historical data Additional circumstantial evidence that supplements this data and makes the case for the Resurrection even stronger 47
  • 206. Explanations Regarding the Tomb Resurrection Vecchietta (1412-1480) Bronze, 1472 Frick Collection, New York 48
  • 207. Explanations Regarding the Tomb Tomb was either occupied or empty on the first day of the week Resurrection Vecchietta (1412-1480) Bronze, 1472 Frick Collection, New York 48
  • 208. Explanations Regarding the Tomb Tomb was either occupied or empty on the first day of the week 4 Theories: Occupied Resurrection Vecchietta (1412-1480) Bronze, 1472 Frick Collection, New York 48
  • 209. Explanations Regarding the Tomb Tomb was either occupied or empty on the first day of the week 4 Theories: Occupied 4 Theories: Empty Resurrection Vecchietta (1412-1480) Bronze, 1472 Frick Collection, New York 48
  • 210. Occupied: 1. Unknown Tomb Christ Appearing to Mary Magdelene After the Resurrection, William Etty, c.1790 49
  • 211. Occupied: 1. Unknown Tomb All four Gospels state that Joseph of Arimathea obtained permission from Pilate to bury the body of Jesus in his newly hewn tomb Christ Appearing to Mary Magdelene After the Resurrection, William Etty, c.1790 49
  • 212. Occupied: 1. Unknown Tomb All four Gospels state that Joseph of Arimathea obtained permission from Pilate to bury the body of Jesus in his newly hewn tomb Joseph of Arimathea knew the location of his own private garden tomb Christ Appearing to Mary Magdelene After the Resurrection, William Etty, c.1790 49
  • 213. Occupied: 1. Unknown Tomb All four Gospels state that Joseph of Arimathea obtained permission from Pilate to bury the body of Jesus in his newly hewn tomb Joseph of Arimathea knew the location of his own private garden tomb The women and disciples had Christ Appearing to Mary Magdelene After the Resurrection, no problem finding Jesus’ tomb William Etty, c.1790 49
  • 215. Occupied: 2. Wrong Tomb This theory eliminates the "He has risen" of Mark 16:6 50
  • 216. Occupied: 2. Wrong Tomb This theory eliminates the "He has risen" of Mark 16:6 "He is not here; behold, here is the place where they laid Him." He was telling them that they had the wrong tomb, but the women misunderstood 50
  • 217. Occupied: 2. Wrong Tomb This theory eliminates the "He has risen" of Mark 16:6 "He is not here; behold, here is the place where they laid Him." He was telling them that they had the wrong tomb, but the women misunderstood No textual basis; distortion 50
  • 218. Occupied: 2. Wrong Tomb This theory eliminates the "He has risen" of Mark 16:6 "He is not here; behold, here is the place where they laid Him." He was telling them that they had the wrong tomb, but the women misunderstood No textual basis; distortion Requires the absurd conclusion that Peter and John, Joseph of Arimathea, the guards, and the Jewish and Roman authorities all went to the wrong tomb 50
  • 219. Occupied: 3. Spiritual Resurrection Resurrection of Christ Paolo Uccello (1397-1475) Stained glass window, 1443-1445 Duomo, Florence 51
  • 220. Occupied: 3. Spiritual Resurrection Jesus was resurrected spiritually, not bodily Resurrection of Christ Paolo Uccello (1397-1475) Stained glass window, 1443-1445 Duomo, Florence 51
  • 221. Occupied: 3. Spiritual Resurrection Jesus was resurrected spiritually, not bodily Disciples misunderstood the nature of His resurrection Resurrection of Christ Paolo Uccello (1397-1475) Stained glass window, 1443-1445 Duomo, Florence 51
  • 222. Occupied: 3. Spiritual Resurrection Jesus was resurrected spiritually, not bodily Disciples misunderstood the nature of His resurrection Jesus placed special emphasis on the fact that His body was resurrected Resurrection of Christ Paolo Uccello (1397-1475) Stained glass window, 1443-1445 Duomo, Florence 51
  • 223. Occupied: 3. Spiritual Resurrection Jesus was resurrected spiritually, not bodily Disciples misunderstood the nature of His resurrection Jesus placed special emphasis on the fact that His body was resurrected Disciples touched His body Resurrection of Christ Paolo Uccello (1397-1475) Stained glass window, 1443-1445 Duomo, Florence 51
  • 224. Occupied: 3. Spiritual Resurrection Jesus was resurrected spiritually, not bodily Disciples misunderstood the nature of His resurrection Jesus placed special emphasis on the fact that His body was resurrected Disciples touched His body Resurrection of Christ Paolo Uccello (1397-1475) Spiritual resurrection Stained glass window, 1443-1445 unacceptable to Jews Duomo, Florence 51
  • 225. Occupied: 4. Jesus Had a Twin Jesus Washing Peter's Feet at the Last Supper, Ford Madox Brown, 1865, London 52
  • 226. Occupied: 4. Jesus Had a Twin A twin brother or someone who looked like Jesus was crucified and buried in His place Jesus Washing Peter's Feet at the Last Supper, Ford Madox Brown, 1865, London 52
  • 227. Occupied: 4. Jesus Had a Twin A twin brother or someone who looked like Jesus was crucified and buried in His place No supporting evidence and contradicts many clear passages Jesus Washing Peter's Feet at the Last Supper, Ford Madox Brown, 1865, London 52
  • 228. Occupied: 4. Jesus Had a Twin A twin brother or someone who looked like Jesus was crucified and buried in His place No supporting evidence and contradicts many clear passages Spear wound Jesus Washing Peter's Feet at the Last Supper, Ford Madox Brown, 1865, London 52
  • 229. Occupied: 4. Jesus Had a Twin A twin brother or someone who looked like Jesus was crucified and buried in His place No supporting evidence and contradicts many clear passages Spear wound Jesus Washing Peter's Feet at the Last Supper, Physical ascension Ford Madox Brown, 1865, London 52
  • 230. Empty: 1. Friends Stole the Body Entombment of Christ, Rogier van der Weyden, 1450, Florence 53
  • 231. Empty: 1. Friends Stole the Body One or more of Jesus' friends stole His body Entombment of Christ, Rogier van der Weyden, 1450, Florence 53
  • 232. Empty: 1. Friends Stole the Body One or more of Jesus' friends stole His body Guards faced execution for failure to guard Jesus’ body - asleep? Entombment of Christ, Rogier van der Weyden, 1450, Florence 53
  • 233. Empty: 1. Friends Stole the Body One or more of Jesus' friends stole His body Guards faced execution for failure to guard Jesus’ body - asleep? Problem of disciple’s motive Entombment of Christ, Rogier van der Weyden, 1450, Florence 53
  • 234. Empty: 1. Friends Stole the Body One or more of Jesus' friends stole His body Guards faced execution for failure to guard Jesus’ body - asleep? Problem of disciple’s motive Nothing to gain/everything to lose Entombment of Christ, Rogier van der Weyden, 1450, Florence 53
  • 235. Empty: 1. Friends Stole the Body One or more of Jesus' friends stole His body Guards faced execution for failure to guard Jesus’ body - asleep? Problem of disciple’s motive Nothing to gain/everything to lose Frightened disciples vs. Entombment of Christ, professional soldiers Rogier van der Weyden, 1450, Florence 53
  • 236. Empty: 2. Enemies Stole the Body Dead Christ Attended By Two Angels, Alessandro Allori, c. late 1500’s 54
  • 237. Empty: 2. Enemies Stole the Body The enemies of Jesus stole the body Dead Christ Attended By Two Angels, Alessandro Allori, c. late 1500’s 54
  • 238. Empty: 2. Enemies Stole the Body The enemies of Jesus stole the body Problem of motive Dead Christ Attended By Two Angels, Alessandro Allori, c. late 1500’s 54
  • 239. Empty: 2. Enemies Stole the Body The enemies of Jesus stole the body Problem of motive Could have displayed the body and killed all Resurrection rumors Dead Christ Attended By Two Angels, Alessandro Allori, c. late 1500’s 54
  • 240. Empty: 2. Enemies Stole the Body The enemies of Jesus stole the body Problem of motive Could have displayed the body and killed all Resurrection rumors Complete silence by Jewish and Roman authorities indicated His body was Dead Christ Attended By Two Angels, inexplicably gone Alessandro Allori, c. late 1500’s 54
  • 241. Empty: 3. Swoon Theory The Body of the Dead Christ in the Tomb, Hans Holbein the Younger, 1521, Basle 55
  • 242. Empty: 3. Swoon Theory Jesus "swooned" on the cross and appeared to be dead, but revived The Body of the Dead Christ in the Tomb, Hans Holbein the Younger, 1521, Basle 55
  • 243. Empty: 3. Swoon Theory Jesus "swooned" on the cross and appeared to be dead, but revived Jesus endured the beatings at His trials, the crown of thorns, the terrible scourging, the crucifixion, and even the spear thrust in His side and somehow survived The Body of the Dead Christ in the Tomb, Hans Holbein the Younger, 1521, Basle 55
  • 244. Empty: 3. Swoon Theory Jesus "swooned" on the cross and appeared to be dead, but revived Jesus endured the beatings at His trials, the crown of thorns, the terrible scourging, the crucifixion, and even the spear thrust in His side and somehow survived Professional executioners, loss of blood, cold, no food, water, or assistance, revives. A ludicrous theory The Body of the Dead Christ in the Tomb, Hans Holbein the Younger, 1521, Basle 55
  • 246. Empty: 4. Passover Plot Theory Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament messianic passages 56
  • 247. Empty: 4. Passover Plot Theory Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament messianic passages Drugged and appeared to be dead 56
  • 248. Empty: 4. Passover Plot Theory Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament messianic passages Drugged and appeared to be dead Lived only briefly after being revived because of His spear wound 56
  • 249. Empty: 4. Passover Plot Theory Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament messianic passages Drugged and appeared to be dead Lived only briefly after being revived because of His spear wound Fanciful scenario appears in The Passover Plot, by Hugh Schoenfield 56
  • 250. Empty: 4. Passover Plot Theory Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament messianic passages Drugged and appeared to be dead Lived only briefly after being revived because of His spear wound Fanciful scenario appears in The Passover Plot, by Hugh Schoenfield Anti-resurrection theory is totally bereft of evidence 56
  • 251. Conclusion: The Empty Tomb Jesus Appears to Mary Magdelene Lavinia Fontana, 1581, Florence 57
  • 252. Conclusion: The Empty Tomb None of these theories even comes close to accounting for: Jesus Appears to Mary Magdelene Lavinia Fontana, 1581, Florence 57
  • 253. Conclusion: The Empty Tomb None of these theories even comes close to accounting for: The historical facts associated with the empty tomb Jesus Appears to Mary Magdelene Lavinia Fontana, 1581, Florence 57
  • 254. Conclusion: The Empty Tomb None of these theories even comes close to accounting for: The historical facts associated with the empty tomb The appearances of the resurrected Christ Jesus Appears to Mary Magdelene Lavinia Fontana, 1581, Florence 57
  • 255. Conclusion: The Empty Tomb None of these theories even comes close to accounting for: The historical facts associated with the empty tomb The appearances of the resurrected Christ The radical changes in the lives of the disciples Jesus Appears to Mary Magdelene Lavinia Fontana, 1581, Florence 57
  • 256. Conclusion: The Empty Tomb None of these theories even comes close to accounting for: The historical facts associated with the empty tomb The appearances of the resurrected Christ The radical changes in the lives of the disciples Jesus Appears to Mary Magdelene Distortion of clear evidence Lavinia Fontana, 1581, Florence 57
  • 257. Explanation of the Appearances: Witnesses Lied 58
  • 258. Explanation of the Appearances: Witnesses Lied The disciples all lied about seeing the resurrected Jesus 58
  • 259. Explanation of the Appearances: Witnesses Lied The disciples all lied about seeing the resurrected Jesus Contradicts the historical accounts 58
  • 260. Explanation of the Appearances: Witnesses Lied The disciples all lied about seeing the resurrected Jesus Contradicts the historical accounts Therefore all of the disciples who claimed to have seen the Lord (including the 500 people mentioned by Paul) were liars 58
  • 261. Explanation of the Appearances: Witnesses Lied The disciples all lied about seeing the resurrected Jesus Contradicts the historical accounts Therefore all of the disciples who claimed to have seen the Lord (including the 500 people mentioned by Paul) were liars Many were martyred for their testimony 58
  • 262. Explanation of the Appearances: Hallucinations 59
  • 263. Explanation of the Appearances: Hallucinations The post-resurrection appearances of Christ were merely hallucinations in the minds of the disciples 59
  • 264. Explanation of the Appearances: Hallucinations The post-resurrection appearances of Christ were merely hallucinations in the minds of the disciples Hallucinations are private, not public experiences 59
  • 265. Explanation of the Appearances: Hallucinations The post-resurrection appearances of Christ were merely hallucinations in the minds of the disciples Hallucinations are private, not public experiences Hallucinations restricted to favorable times/places & certain types of unstable people 59
  • 266. Explanation of the Appearances: Hallucinations The post-resurrection appearances of Christ were merely hallucinations in the minds of the disciples Hallucinations are private, not public experiences Hallucinations restricted to favorable times/places & certain types of unstable people Disciples touched, talked, and ate with the Lord 59
  • 267. Explanation of the Appearances: Legend Loch Ness Monster Legend Photo, 1972, Scotland 60
  • 268. Explanation of the Appearances: Legend The Resurrection is an elaborate legend created by the early church Loch Ness Monster Legend Photo, 1972, Scotland 60
  • 269. Explanation of the Appearances: Legend The Resurrection is an elaborate legend created by the early church Resurrection backed by reliable, eyewitness accounts Loch Ness Monster Legend Photo, 1972, Scotland 60
  • 270. Explanation of the Appearances: Legend The Resurrection is an elaborate legend created by the early church Resurrection backed by reliable, eyewitness accounts Dating of NT precludes the development of such a legend Loch Ness Monster Legend Photo, 1972, Scotland 60
  • 271. Explanation of the Appearances: Legend The Resurrection is an elaborate legend created by the early church Resurrection backed by reliable, eyewitness accounts Dating of NT precludes the development of such a legend Archeological discoveries continue to validate the Loch Ness Monster Legend historical reliability of the Bible Photo, 1972, Scotland 60
  • 272. Circumstantial Evidence 1: Christ Foretold His Resurrection 61
  • 273. Circumstantial Evidence 1: Christ Foretold His Resurrection Christ predicted His own resurrection on the third day 61
  • 274. Circumstantial Evidence 1: Christ Foretold His Resurrection Christ predicted His own resurrection on the third day Christ announced that this would be the most significant sign for the affirmation of His truth claims 61
  • 275. Circumstantial Evidence 1: Christ Foretold His Resurrection Christ predicted His own resurrection on the third day Christ announced that this would be the most significant sign for the affirmation of His truth claims Christ demonstrated foreknowledge (Matt. 12:38-40; Mark 8:31; 9:31; 10:33-34; John 2:18-22) 61
  • 276. Circumstantial Evidence 2: Silence of the Jews Jews in the Synogogue Rembrandt (1606-1669) 62
  • 277. Circumstantial Evidence 2: Silence of the Jews The silence of the Jewish leaders about the Resurrection eloquently testified that they knew these things were undeniable Jews in the Synogogue Rembrandt (1606-1669) 62
  • 278. Circumstantial Evidence 2: Silence of the Jews The silence of the Jewish leaders about the Resurrection eloquently testified that they knew these things were undeniable No refutation Jews in the Synogogue Rembrandt (1606-1669) 62
  • 279. Circumstantial Evidence 3: Changed Lives of the Disciples Pentecost Titian (1488-1576) 63
  • 280. Circumstantial Evidence 3: Changed Lives of the Disciples Disciples were fearful and weak before the Resurrection Pentecost Titian (1488-1576) 63
  • 281. Circumstantial Evidence 3: Changed Lives of the Disciples Disciples were fearful and weak before the Resurrection By the Day of Pentecost seven weeks later, they were boldly proclaiming Christ Pentecost Titian (1488-1576) 63
  • 282. Circumstantial Evidence 3: Changed Lives of the Disciples Disciples were fearful and weak before the Resurrection By the Day of Pentecost seven weeks later, they were boldly proclaiming Christ Transformation was complete, permanent, and unanimous Pentecost Titian (1488-1576) 63

Notas do Editor

  1. Often-Asked Questions:\nHow can a rational person today accept the stories of\nmiracles in the Bible?\nAren't miracles contrary to the laws of modern science? There is no historical basis for the miracles in the\nBible — aren 't they simply myths and legends designed\nto create religious faith? If there were miracles then, why doesn }t God perform\nmiracles today?\n\n
  2. How can a rational person today accept the stories of miracles in the Bible?\nAren't miracles contrary to the laws of modern science? \nThere is no historical basis for the miracles in the Bible — aren’t they simply myths and legends designed to create religious faith? \nIf there were miracles then, why doesn’t God perform miracles today?\n\n\n
  3. How can a rational person today accept the stories of miracles in the Bible?\nAren't miracles contrary to the laws of modern science? \nThere is no historical basis for the miracles in the Bible — aren’t they simply myths and legends designed to create religious faith? \nIf there were miracles then, why doesn’t God perform miracles today?\n\n\n
  4. How can a rational person today accept the stories of miracles in the Bible?\nAren't miracles contrary to the laws of modern science? \nThere is no historical basis for the miracles in the Bible — aren’t they simply myths and legends designed to create religious faith? \nIf there were miracles then, why doesn’t God perform miracles today?\n\n\n
  5. How can a rational person today accept the stories of miracles in the Bible?\nAren't miracles contrary to the laws of modern science? \nThere is no historical basis for the miracles in the Bible — aren’t they simply myths and legends designed to create religious faith? \nIf there were miracles then, why doesn’t God perform miracles today?\n\n\n
  6. \n
  7. \n
  8. \n
  9. \n
  10. The first optional answer flatly denies even the possibility of miracles. The assumption is they cannot and, therefore, do not take place. \nThe second option grants that God could perform miracles but questions whether He has chosen to do so. According to this view, the evidence is insufficient to settle the issue, or it is unreasonable to expect that Almighty God would stoop to the use of miracles to cause people to believe in Him. \nThe third option is that God has intervened in history in miraculous ways to accomplish His purposes.\n\n
  11. The first optional answer flatly denies even the possibility of miracles. The assumption is they cannot and, therefore, do not take place. \nThe second option grants that God could perform miracles but questions whether He has chosen to do so. According to this view, the evidence is insufficient to settle the issue, or it is unreasonable to expect that Almighty God would stoop to the use of miracles to cause people to believe in Him. \nThe third option is that God has intervened in history in miraculous ways to accomplish His purposes.\n\n
  12. The first optional answer flatly denies even the possibility of miracles. The assumption is they cannot and, therefore, do not take place. \nThe second option grants that God could perform miracles but questions whether He has chosen to do so. According to this view, the evidence is insufficient to settle the issue, or it is unreasonable to expect that Almighty God would stoop to the use of miracles to cause people to believe in Him. \nThe third option is that God has intervened in history in miraculous ways to accomplish His purposes.\n\n
  13. One of the unique features of Christianity is that its teachings are built directly upon God's miraculous acts on behalf of His people. In most other religions, there are very few accounts of miracles, and these are veiled in mythology. Miracles are more prominent in the scriptures of Hinduism, yet even Hinduism does not crumble if its miracles are removed. But the miracles of the Bible are firmly embedded in space-time history, and the truth of Christianity stands or falls with the historicity of these miracles, especially the Resurrection. Passages such as John 10:25; 14:11; 15:24 and 1 Corinthians 15:12-19 underscore the centrality of miracles to the truth claims of Christianity.\n\n\n
  14. One of the unique features of Christianity is that its teachings are built directly upon God's miraculous acts on behalf of His people. In most other religions, there are very few accounts of miracles, and these are veiled in mythology. Miracles are more prominent in the scriptures of Hinduism, yet even Hinduism does not crumble if its miracles are removed. But the miracles of the Bible are firmly embedded in space-time history, and the truth of Christianity stands or falls with the historicity of these miracles, especially the Resurrection. Passages such as John 10:25; 14:11; 15:24 and 1 Corinthians 15:12-19 underscore the centrality of miracles to the truth claims of Christianity.\n\n\n
  15. One of the unique features of Christianity is that its teachings are built directly upon God's miraculous acts on behalf of His people. In most other religions, there are very few accounts of miracles, and these are veiled in mythology. Miracles are more prominent in the scriptures of Hinduism, yet even Hinduism does not crumble if its miracles are removed. But the miracles of the Bible are firmly embedded in space-time history, and the truth of Christianity stands or falls with the historicity of these miracles, especially the Resurrection. Passages such as John 10:25; 14:11; 15:24 and 1 Corinthians 15:12-19 underscore the centrality of miracles to the truth claims of Christianity.\n\n\n
  16. Those who hold this position claim that the kinds of miracles described in the Bible cannot occur for philosophical or scientific reasons. \n
  17. The philosophy of naturalism asserts that the universe operates according to uniform natural causes, and that it is impossible for any force outside the universe to intervene in the cosmos. This, of course, is an antisupernatural assumption which only atheists can hold consistently.\n
  18. The philosophy of naturalism asserts that the universe operates according to uniform natural causes, and that it is impossible for any force outside the universe to intervene in the cosmos. This, of course, is an antisupernatural assumption which only atheists can hold consistently.\n
  19. The philosophy of naturalism asserts that the universe operates according to uniform natural causes, and that it is impossible for any force outside the universe to intervene in the cosmos. This, of course, is an antisupernatural assumption which only atheists can hold consistently.\n
  20. Some philosophers have, in effect, defined miracles as events which cannot occur. David Hume (1711-1776), in his refutation of miracles, held that no amount of evidence can establish that a miracle has occurred. This, he argued, is because of the uniformity of natural law (the idea that the laws of nature are unchanging and inviolable; Hume actually denied this principle in his other works). The uniformity of natural law is in turn supported by the uniform experience of men against the occurrence of miracles. But what about the documented reports of miracles? They must be false, because they violate the uniformity of natural law! This is arguing in a circle, because it assumes the very thing that must be proven. It is not reasonable to define something as impossible and then conclude from the definition that there is no evidence for it. This is a case of determining the verdict before openly examining the evidence on its own merits.\n\n\n
  21. Some philosophers have, in effect, defined miracles as events which cannot occur. David Hume (1711-1776), in his refutation of miracles, held that no amount of evidence can establish that a miracle has occurred. This, he argued, is because of the uniformity of natural law (the idea that the laws of nature are unchanging and inviolable; Hume actually denied this principle in his other works). The uniformity of natural law is in turn supported by the uniform experience of men against the occurrence of miracles. But what about the documented reports of miracles? They must be false, because they violate the uniformity of natural law! This is arguing in a circle, because it assumes the very thing that must be proven. It is not reasonable to define something as impossible and then conclude from the definition that there is no evidence for it. This is a case of determining the verdict before openly examining the evidence on its own merits.\n\n\n
  22. Some philosophers have, in effect, defined miracles as events which cannot occur. David Hume (1711-1776), in his refutation of miracles, held that no amount of evidence can establish that a miracle has occurred. This, he argued, is because of the uniformity of natural law (the idea that the laws of nature are unchanging and inviolable; Hume actually denied this principle in his other works). The uniformity of natural law is in turn supported by the uniform experience of men against the occurrence of miracles. But what about the documented reports of miracles? They must be false, because they violate the uniformity of natural law! This is arguing in a circle, because it assumes the very thing that must be proven. It is not reasonable to define something as impossible and then conclude from the definition that there is no evidence for it. This is a case of determining the verdict before openly examining the evidence on its own merits.\n\n\n
  23. Some philosophers have, in effect, defined miracles as events which cannot occur. David Hume (1711-1776), in his refutation of miracles, held that no amount of evidence can establish that a miracle has occurred. This, he argued, is because of the uniformity of natural law (the idea that the laws of nature are unchanging and inviolable; Hume actually denied this principle in his other works). The uniformity of natural law is in turn supported by the uniform experience of men against the occurrence of miracles. But what about the documented reports of miracles? They must be false, because they violate the uniformity of natural law! This is arguing in a circle, because it assumes the very thing that must be proven. It is not reasonable to define something as impossible and then conclude from the definition that there is no evidence for it. This is a case of determining the verdict before openly examining the evidence on its own merits.\n\n\n
  24. Some philosophers have, in effect, defined miracles as events which cannot occur. David Hume (1711-1776), in his refutation of miracles, held that no amount of evidence can establish that a miracle has occurred. This, he argued, is because of the uniformity of natural law (the idea that the laws of nature are unchanging and inviolable; Hume actually denied this principle in his other works). The uniformity of natural law is in turn supported by the uniform experience of men against the occurrence of miracles. But what about the documented reports of miracles? They must be false, because they violate the uniformity of natural law! This is arguing in a circle, because it assumes the very thing that must be proven. It is not reasonable to define something as impossible and then conclude from the definition that there is no evidence for it. This is a case of determining the verdict before openly examining the evidence on its own merits.\n\n\n
  25. The antisupernatural assumption must be seen for what it is: a presupposition that God either does not exist or cannot directly intrude into the historical process. This presupposition has quietly become a part of the whole scientific enterprise, so that many scientists rule out the possibility of miracles from the beginning. But when they raise this objection, they are walking on the turf of metaphysics (philosophy), not science.\nThe scientific method is obviously useful in gaining a great deal of knowledge, but remember that science is limited in its scope to the study of natural phenomena, especially that which is repeatable. Those who forget this fact commit one of the great mistakes of our age — the degeneration of science (a method for gaining theoretical and applied knowledge) into scientism (a naturalistic worldview). Scientific laws are descriptive, not prescriptive; they describe how nature operates, but they do not cause events to happen.\n\nImage: Sliced dragonfruit.\n\n
  26. The antisupernatural assumption must be seen for what it is: a presupposition that God either does not exist or cannot directly intrude into the historical process. This presupposition has quietly become a part of the whole scientific enterprise, so that many scientists rule out the possibility of miracles from the beginning. But when they raise this objection, they are walking on the turf of metaphysics (philosophy), not science.\nThe scientific method is obviously useful in gaining a great deal of knowledge, but remember that science is limited in its scope to the study of natural phenomena, especially that which is repeatable. Those who forget this fact commit one of the great mistakes of our age — the degeneration of science (a method for gaining theoretical and applied knowledge) into scientism (a naturalistic worldview). Scientific laws are descriptive, not prescriptive; they describe how nature operates, but they do not cause events to happen.\n\nImage: Sliced dragonfruit.\n\n
  27. The antisupernatural assumption must be seen for what it is: a presupposition that God either does not exist or cannot directly intrude into the historical process. This presupposition has quietly become a part of the whole scientific enterprise, so that many scientists rule out the possibility of miracles from the beginning. But when they raise this objection, they are walking on the turf of metaphysics (philosophy), not science.\nThe scientific method is obviously useful in gaining a great deal of knowledge, but remember that science is limited in its scope to the study of natural phenomena, especially that which is repeatable. Those who forget this fact commit one of the great mistakes of our age — the degeneration of science (a method for gaining theoretical and applied knowledge) into scientism (a naturalistic worldview). Scientific laws are descriptive, not prescriptive; they describe how nature operates, but they do not cause events to happen.\n\nImage: Sliced dragonfruit.\n\n
  28. The antisupernatural assumption must be seen for what it is: a presupposition that God either does not exist or cannot directly intrude into the historical process. This presupposition has quietly become a part of the whole scientific enterprise, so that many scientists rule out the possibility of miracles from the beginning. But when they raise this objection, they are walking on the turf of metaphysics (philosophy), not science.\nThe scientific method is obviously useful in gaining a great deal of knowledge, but remember that science is limited in its scope to the study of natural phenomena, especially that which is repeatable. Those who forget this fact commit one of the great mistakes of our age — the degeneration of science (a method for gaining theoretical and applied knowledge) into scientism (a naturalistic worldview). Scientific laws are descriptive, not prescriptive; they describe how nature operates, but they do not cause events to happen.\n\nImage: Sliced dragonfruit.\n\n
  29. The antisupernatural assumption must be seen for what it is: a presupposition that God either does not exist or cannot directly intrude into the historical process. This presupposition has quietly become a part of the whole scientific enterprise, so that many scientists rule out the possibility of miracles from the beginning. But when they raise this objection, they are walking on the turf of metaphysics (philosophy), not science.\nThe scientific method is obviously useful in gaining a great deal of knowledge, but remember that science is limited in its scope to the study of natural phenomena, especially that which is repeatable. Those who forget this fact commit one of the great mistakes of our age — the degeneration of science (a method for gaining theoretical and applied knowledge) into scientism (a naturalistic worldview). Scientific laws are descriptive, not prescriptive; they describe how nature operates, but they do not cause events to happen.\n\nImage: Sliced dragonfruit.\n\n
  30. Since miracles, if they occur, are empowered by something higher than nature, they must supersede the ordinary processes or laws of nature. If you took a flying leap off the edge of a building, the phenomenon that we call the law of gravity would surely bring you to an untimely end. But if you leaped off the same cliff in a hang glider, the results would (hopefully!) be quite different. The principle of aerodynamics in this case overcomes the pull of gravity as long as the glider is in the air. \n\n
  31. Since miracles, if they occur, are empowered by something higher than nature, they must supersede the ordinary processes or laws of nature. If you took a flying leap off the edge of a building, the phenomenon that we call the law of gravity would surely bring you to an untimely end. But if you leaped off the same cliff in a hang glider, the results would (hopefully!) be quite different. The principle of aerodynamics in this case overcomes the pull of gravity as long as the glider is in the air. \n\n
  32. Since miracles, if they occur, are empowered by something higher than nature, they must supersede the ordinary processes or laws of nature. If you took a flying leap off the edge of a building, the phenomenon that we call the law of gravity would surely bring you to an untimely end. But if you leaped off the same cliff in a hang glider, the results would (hopefully!) be quite different. The principle of aerodynamics in this case overcomes the pull of gravity as long as the glider is in the air. \n\n
  33. Since miracles, if they occur, are empowered by something higher than nature, they must supersede the ordinary processes or laws of nature. If you took a flying leap off the edge of a building, the phenomenon that we call the law of gravity would surely bring you to an untimely end. But if you leaped off the same cliff in a hang glider, the results would (hopefully!) be quite different. The principle of aerodynamics in this case overcomes the pull of gravity as long as the glider is in the air. \n\n
  34. Since miracles, if they occur, are empowered by something higher than nature, they must supersede the ordinary processes or laws of nature. If you took a flying leap off the edge of a building, the phenomenon that we call the law of gravity would surely bring you to an untimely end. But if you leaped off the same cliff in a hang glider, the results would (hopefully!) be quite different. The principle of aerodynamics in this case overcomes the pull of gravity as long as the glider is in the air. \n\n
  35. \n
  36. \n
  37. Because miracles are accomplished by a supernatural agency, there is no natural explanation for how they happen. But our inability to explain them certainly does not mean, therefore, that they cannot take place. Scientists still cannot explain many nonmiraculous phenomena, but these phenomena occur nevertheless. (i.e. the total liquefaction of a caterpillar’s body as it metamorphisizes into a butterfly; the nature of light, etc.)\n\n
  38. Because miracles are accomplished by a supernatural agency, there is no natural explanation for how they happen. But our inability to explain them certainly does not mean, therefore, that they cannot take place. Scientists still cannot explain many nonmiraculous phenomena, but these phenomena occur nevertheless. (i.e. the total liquefaction of a caterpillar’s body as it metamorphisizes into a butterfly; the nature of light, etc.)\n\n
  39. Because miracles are accomplished by a supernatural agency, there is no natural explanation for how they happen. But our inability to explain them certainly does not mean, therefore, that they cannot take place. Scientists still cannot explain many nonmiraculous phenomena, but these phenomena occur nevertheless. (i.e. the total liquefaction of a caterpillar’s body as it metamorphisizes into a butterfly; the nature of light, etc.)\n\n
  40. Because miracles are accomplished by a supernatural agency, there is no natural explanation for how they happen. But our inability to explain them certainly does not mean, therefore, that they cannot take place. Scientists still cannot explain many nonmiraculous phenomena, but these phenomena occur nevertheless. (i.e. the total liquefaction of a caterpillar’s body as it metamorphisizes into a butterfly; the nature of light, etc.)\n\n
  41. Because miracles are accomplished by a supernatural agency, there is no natural explanation for how they happen. But our inability to explain them certainly does not mean, therefore, that they cannot take place. Scientists still cannot explain many nonmiraculous phenomena, but these phenomena occur nevertheless. (i.e. the total liquefaction of a caterpillar’s body as it metamorphisizes into a butterfly; the nature of light, etc.)\n\n
  42. Another scientific objection to miracles is that they destroy the regularity of nature. The scientific method is built upon the assumption that we live in an orderly universe. But if divine interventions can take place at any time, anything can happen, and order is replaced by confusion. This objection is caused by a complete misunderstanding of the biblical teaching on miracles. The Bible affirms that this is an orderly universe because it has been created and sustained by an intelligent Designer. God has instituted what we call the laws of nature, but He is not bound by them. He sometimes chooses to supersede them in order to reveal something about Himself to men. But an examination of the Bible shows that these sovereign interventions or miracles are unusual, not commonplace events. In fact, a miracle by its very nature must be a unique event that stands out against the background of ordinary and regular occurrences. Thus, it is just as devastating to the concept of miracles to believe that we are surrounded by them as to say that there are no such things.\n\n
  43. Another scientific objection to miracles is that they destroy the regularity of nature. The scientific method is built upon the assumption that we live in an orderly universe. But if divine interventions can take place at any time, anything can happen, and order is replaced by confusion. This objection is caused by a complete misunderstanding of the biblical teaching on miracles. The Bible affirms that this is an orderly universe because it has been created and sustained by an intelligent Designer. God has instituted what we call the laws of nature, but He is not bound by them. He sometimes chooses to supersede them in order to reveal something about Himself to men. But an examination of the Bible shows that these sovereign interventions or miracles are unusual, not commonplace events. In fact, a miracle by its very nature must be a unique event that stands out against the background of ordinary and regular occurrences. Thus, it is just as devastating to the concept of miracles to believe that we are surrounded by them as to say that there are no such things.\n\n
  44. Another scientific objection to miracles is that they destroy the regularity of nature. The scientific method is built upon the assumption that we live in an orderly universe. But if divine interventions can take place at any time, anything can happen, and order is replaced by confusion. This objection is caused by a complete misunderstanding of the biblical teaching on miracles. The Bible affirms that this is an orderly universe because it has been created and sustained by an intelligent Designer. God has instituted what we call the laws of nature, but He is not bound by them. He sometimes chooses to supersede them in order to reveal something about Himself to men. But an examination of the Bible shows that these sovereign interventions or miracles are unusual, not commonplace events. In fact, a miracle by its very nature must be a unique event that stands out against the background of ordinary and regular occurrences. Thus, it is just as devastating to the concept of miracles to believe that we are surrounded by them as to say that there are no such things.\n\n
  45. Another scientific objection to miracles is that they destroy the regularity of nature. The scientific method is built upon the assumption that we live in an orderly universe. But if divine interventions can take place at any time, anything can happen, and order is replaced by confusion. This objection is caused by a complete misunderstanding of the biblical teaching on miracles. The Bible affirms that this is an orderly universe because it has been created and sustained by an intelligent Designer. God has instituted what we call the laws of nature, but He is not bound by them. He sometimes chooses to supersede them in order to reveal something about Himself to men. But an examination of the Bible shows that these sovereign interventions or miracles are unusual, not commonplace events. In fact, a miracle by its very nature must be a unique event that stands out against the background of ordinary and regular occurrences. Thus, it is just as devastating to the concept of miracles to believe that we are surrounded by them as to say that there are no such things.\n\n
  46. Another scientific objection to miracles is that they destroy the regularity of nature. The scientific method is built upon the assumption that we live in an orderly universe. But if divine interventions can take place at any time, anything can happen, and order is replaced by confusion. This objection is caused by a complete misunderstanding of the biblical teaching on miracles. The Bible affirms that this is an orderly universe because it has been created and sustained by an intelligent Designer. God has instituted what we call the laws of nature, but He is not bound by them. He sometimes chooses to supersede them in order to reveal something about Himself to men. But an examination of the Bible shows that these sovereign interventions or miracles are unusual, not commonplace events. In fact, a miracle by its very nature must be a unique event that stands out against the background of ordinary and regular occurrences. Thus, it is just as devastating to the concept of miracles to believe that we are surrounded by them as to say that there are no such things.\n\n
  47. Scientific inquiry is not threatened by the occurrence of miracles, because they are by definition unusual events that involve a very brief suspension of the normal processes of nature by a higher power\n
  48. Scientific inquiry is not threatened by the occurrence of miracles, because they are by definition unusual events that involve a very brief suspension of the normal processes of nature by a higher power\n
  49. Scientific inquiry is not threatened by the occurrence of miracles, because they are by definition unusual events that involve a very brief suspension of the normal processes of nature by a higher power\n
  50. The song "I Believe in Miracles" illustrates the miraculous by referring to a lily pushing its way up through the stubborn sod. While the growth of a plant and the design of the human body point to the wonderful handiwork of God, it is not really correct to call these miracles. To do so would be to turn everything into miracles. This would dilute the concept of the miraculous so much that it would become useless. What we mean and what most people who raise this question mean by the term "miracle" is a phenomenon that occurs in space-time history that is so radically different from the ordinary operations of nature that its observers are justified in attributing it to the direct intervention of a supernatural agent.\n\n\n
  51. The song "I Believe in Miracles" illustrates the miraculous by referring to a lily pushing its way up through the stubborn sod. While the growth of a plant and the design of the human body point to the wonderful handiwork of God, it is not really correct to call these miracles. To do so would be to turn everything into miracles. This would dilute the concept of the miraculous so much that it would become useless. What we mean and what most people who raise this question mean by the term "miracle" is a phenomenon that occurs in space-time history that is so radically different from the ordinary operations of nature that its observers are justified in attributing it to the direct intervention of a supernatural agent.\n\n\n
  52. The song "I Believe in Miracles" illustrates the miraculous by referring to a lily pushing its way up through the stubborn sod. While the growth of a plant and the design of the human body point to the wonderful handiwork of God, it is not really correct to call these miracles. To do so would be to turn everything into miracles. This would dilute the concept of the miraculous so much that it would become useless. What we mean and what most people who raise this question mean by the term "miracle" is a phenomenon that occurs in space-time history that is so radically different from the ordinary operations of nature that its observers are justified in attributing it to the direct intervention of a supernatural agent.\n\n\n
  53. Significantly, the miracles of the Bible are actually clustered around three relatively brief periods associated with the giving of new revelation by God: the times of Moses and Joshua, Elijah and Elisha, and Christ and the apostles. These miracles were irrefutable signs from God that were designed to authenticate God's revealed Word (the Law, the Prophets, and the New Testament). These three periods were separated by centuries in which only a very few miracles are recorded. The gap between Joshua and Elijah was about 540 years, and the gap between Elisha and Christ was about 830 years. The Bible is not a record of one miracle after another; its miracles were singular events that produced a profound response in those who were privileged to observe them.\n\n
  54. Significantly, the miracles of the Bible are actually clustered around three relatively brief periods associated with the giving of new revelation by God: the times of Moses and Joshua, Elijah and Elisha, and Christ and the apostles. These miracles were irrefutable signs from God that were designed to authenticate God's revealed Word (the Law, the Prophets, and the New Testament). These three periods were separated by centuries in which only a very few miracles are recorded. The gap between Joshua and Elijah was about 540 years, and the gap between Elisha and Christ was about 830 years. The Bible is not a record of one miracle after another; its miracles were singular events that produced a profound response in those who were privileged to observe them.\n\n
  55. Significantly, the miracles of the Bible are actually clustered around three relatively brief periods associated with the giving of new revelation by God: the times of Moses and Joshua, Elijah and Elisha, and Christ and the apostles. These miracles were irrefutable signs from God that were designed to authenticate God's revealed Word (the Law, the Prophets, and the New Testament). These three periods were separated by centuries in which only a very few miracles are recorded. The gap between Joshua and Elijah was about 540 years, and the gap between Elisha and Christ was about 830 years. The Bible is not a record of one miracle after another; its miracles were singular events that produced a profound response in those who were privileged to observe them.\n\n
  56. Significantly, the miracles of the Bible are actually clustered around three relatively brief periods associated with the giving of new revelation by God: the times of Moses and Joshua, Elijah and Elisha, and Christ and the apostles. These miracles were irrefutable signs from God that were designed to authenticate God's revealed Word (the Law, the Prophets, and the New Testament). These three periods were separated by centuries in which only a very few miracles are recorded. The gap between Joshua and Elijah was about 540 years, and the gap between Elisha and Christ was about 830 years. The Bible is not a record of one miracle after another; its miracles were singular events that produced a profound response in those who were privileged to observe them.\n\n
  57. Significantly, the miracles of the Bible are actually clustered around three relatively brief periods associated with the giving of new revelation by God: the times of Moses and Joshua, Elijah and Elisha, and Christ and the apostles. These miracles were irrefutable signs from God that were designed to authenticate God's revealed Word (the Law, the Prophets, and the New Testament). These three periods were separated by centuries in which only a very few miracles are recorded. The gap between Joshua and Elijah was about 540 years, and the gap between Elisha and Christ was about 830 years. The Bible is not a record of one miracle after another; its miracles were singular events that produced a profound response in those who were privileged to observe them.\n\n
  58. Significantly, the miracles of the Bible are actually clustered around three relatively brief periods associated with the giving of new revelation by God: the times of Moses and Joshua, Elijah and Elisha, and Christ and the apostles. These miracles were irrefutable signs from God that were designed to authenticate God's revealed Word (the Law, the Prophets, and the New Testament). These three periods were separated by centuries in which only a very few miracles are recorded. The gap between Joshua and Elijah was about 540 years, and the gap between Elisha and Christ was about 830 years. The Bible is not a record of one miracle after another; its miracles were singular events that produced a profound response in those who were privileged to observe them.\n\n
  59. Significantly, the miracles of the Bible are actually clustered around three relatively brief periods associated with the giving of new revelation by God: the times of Moses and Joshua, Elijah and Elisha, and Christ and the apostles. These miracles were irrefutable signs from God that were designed to authenticate God's revealed Word (the Law, the Prophets, and the New Testament). These three periods were separated by centuries in which only a very few miracles are recorded. The gap between Joshua and Elijah was about 540 years, and the gap between Elisha and Christ was about 830 years. The Bible is not a record of one miracle after another; its miracles were singular events that produced a profound response in those who were privileged to observe them.\n\n
  60. Significantly, the miracles of the Bible are actually clustered around three relatively brief periods associated with the giving of new revelation by God: the times of Moses and Joshua, Elijah and Elisha, and Christ and the apostles. These miracles were irrefutable signs from God that were designed to authenticate God's revealed Word (the Law, the Prophets, and the New Testament). These three periods were separated by centuries in which only a very few miracles are recorded. The gap between Joshua and Elijah was about 540 years, and the gap between Elisha and Christ was about 830 years. The Bible is not a record of one miracle after another; its miracles were singular events that produced a profound response in those who were privileged to observe them.\n\n
  61. Significantly, the miracles of the Bible are actually clustered around three relatively brief periods associated with the giving of new revelation by God: the times of Moses and Joshua, Elijah and Elisha, and Christ and the apostles. These miracles were irrefutable signs from God that were designed to authenticate God's revealed Word (the Law, the Prophets, and the New Testament). These three periods were separated by centuries in which only a very few miracles are recorded. The gap between Joshua and Elijah was about 540 years, and the gap between Elisha and Christ was about 830 years. The Bible is not a record of one miracle after another; its miracles were singular events that produced a profound response in those who were privileged to observe them.\n\n
  62. In overcoming this objection to miracles, be aware of these philosophical and scientific issues, because they frequently come to the surface. But the key issue behind this whole question is whether God exists. If God created the universe, there is a supernatural dimension to reality, and this means that miracles are possible. If the questioner challenges the existence of God, it may be necessary to deal with this more basic issue (see chap. 3) before moving further into the miracles question.\n\nOn the other hand, some people may prefer to delve deeper into the topic of miracles by developing the historical case for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. If a person becomes convinced of the Resurrection, he or she is certainly more likely to believe in the existence of God.\n\n\n\n
  63. In overcoming this objection to miracles, be aware of these philosophical and scientific issues, because they frequently come to the surface. But the key issue behind this whole question is whether God exists. If God created the universe, there is a supernatural dimension to reality, and this means that miracles are possible. If the questioner challenges the existence of God, it may be necessary to deal with this more basic issue (see chap. 3) before moving further into the miracles question.\n\nOn the other hand, some people may prefer to delve deeper into the topic of miracles by developing the historical case for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. If a person becomes convinced of the Resurrection, he or she is certainly more likely to believe in the existence of God.\n\n\n\n
  64. In overcoming this objection to miracles, be aware of these philosophical and scientific issues, because they frequently come to the surface. But the key issue behind this whole question is whether God exists. If God created the universe, there is a supernatural dimension to reality, and this means that miracles are possible. If the questioner challenges the existence of God, it may be necessary to deal with this more basic issue (see chap. 3) before moving further into the miracles question.\n\nOn the other hand, some people may prefer to delve deeper into the topic of miracles by developing the historical case for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. If a person becomes convinced of the Resurrection, he or she is certainly more likely to believe in the existence of God.\n\n\n\n
  65. Incidentally, the idea of a miracle is relative, not absolute. To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and omniscience: there is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised. Edwin Abbott's story, Flatland (1884), is often used to illustrate the difference that another dimension would make. In this book, a spherical being from a three-dimensional world visits a creature named A. Square, who lives in the two-dimensional world of Flatland. However, the concept of height is meaningless to A. Square. He can only perceive things in the two dimensions of length and width. When the spherical being intersects the plane of Flatland, A. Square is amazed to see an expanding and contracting circle (a sphere passing through a plane would appear on the plane as a circle with an increasing and decreasing diameter). The sphere also claims to be able to look inside many of the Flatland houses at once. What is normal to the sphere is considered miraculous to the dwellers of Flatland.\n
  66. Incidentally, the idea of a miracle is relative, not absolute. To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and omniscience: there is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised. Edwin Abbott's story, Flatland (1884), is often used to illustrate the difference that another dimension would make. In this book, a spherical being from a three-dimensional world visits a creature named A. Square, who lives in the two-dimensional world of Flatland. However, the concept of height is meaningless to A. Square. He can only perceive things in the two dimensions of length and width. When the spherical being intersects the plane of Flatland, A. Square is amazed to see an expanding and contracting circle (a sphere passing through a plane would appear on the plane as a circle with an increasing and decreasing diameter). The sphere also claims to be able to look inside many of the Flatland houses at once. What is normal to the sphere is considered miraculous to the dwellers of Flatland.\n
  67. Incidentally, the idea of a miracle is relative, not absolute. To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and omniscience: there is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised. Edwin Abbott's story, Flatland (1884), is often used to illustrate the difference that another dimension would make. In this book, a spherical being from a three-dimensional world visits a creature named A. Square, who lives in the two-dimensional world of Flatland. However, the concept of height is meaningless to A. Square. He can only perceive things in the two dimensions of length and width. When the spherical being intersects the plane of Flatland, A. Square is amazed to see an expanding and contracting circle (a sphere passing through a plane would appear on the plane as a circle with an increasing and decreasing diameter). The sphere also claims to be able to look inside many of the Flatland houses at once. What is normal to the sphere is considered miraculous to the dwellers of Flatland.\n
  68. Incidentally, the idea of a miracle is relative, not absolute. To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and omniscience: there is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised. Edwin Abbott's story, Flatland (1884), is often used to illustrate the difference that another dimension would make. In this book, a spherical being from a three-dimensional world visits a creature named A. Square, who lives in the two-dimensional world of Flatland. However, the concept of height is meaningless to A. Square. He can only perceive things in the two dimensions of length and width. When the spherical being intersects the plane of Flatland, A. Square is amazed to see an expanding and contracting circle (a sphere passing through a plane would appear on the plane as a circle with an increasing and decreasing diameter). The sphere also claims to be able to look inside many of the Flatland houses at once. What is normal to the sphere is considered miraculous to the dwellers of Flatland.\n
  69. Incidentally, the idea of a miracle is relative, not absolute. To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and omniscience: there is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised. Edwin Abbott's story, Flatland (1884), is often used to illustrate the difference that another dimension would make. In this book, a spherical being from a three-dimensional world visits a creature named A. Square, who lives in the two-dimensional world of Flatland. However, the concept of height is meaningless to A. Square. He can only perceive things in the two dimensions of length and width. When the spherical being intersects the plane of Flatland, A. Square is amazed to see an expanding and contracting circle (a sphere passing through a plane would appear on the plane as a circle with an increasing and decreasing diameter). The sphere also claims to be able to look inside many of the Flatland houses at once. What is normal to the sphere is considered miraculous to the dwellers of Flatland.\n
  70. Incidentally, the idea of a miracle is relative, not absolute. To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and omniscience: there is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised. Edwin Abbott's story, Flatland (1884), is often used to illustrate the difference that another dimension would make. In this book, a spherical being from a three-dimensional world visits a creature named A. Square, who lives in the two-dimensional world of Flatland. However, the concept of height is meaningless to A. Square. He can only perceive things in the two dimensions of length and width. When the spherical being intersects the plane of Flatland, A. Square is amazed to see an expanding and contracting circle (a sphere passing through a plane would appear on the plane as a circle with an increasing and decreasing diameter). The sphere also claims to be able to look inside many of the Flatland houses at once. What is normal to the sphere is considered miraculous to the dwellers of Flatland.\n
  71. Incidentally, the idea of a miracle is relative, not absolute. To God, there are no miracles because of His omnipotence and omniscience: there is no higher power than His, and He cannot be surprised. Edwin Abbott's story, Flatland (1884), is often used to illustrate the difference that another dimension would make. In this book, a spherical being from a three-dimensional world visits a creature named A. Square, who lives in the two-dimensional world of Flatland. However, the concept of height is meaningless to A. Square. He can only perceive things in the two dimensions of length and width. When the spherical being intersects the plane of Flatland, A. Square is amazed to see an expanding and contracting circle (a sphere passing through a plane would appear on the plane as a circle with an increasing and decreasing diameter). The sphere also claims to be able to look inside many of the Flatland houses at once. What is normal to the sphere is considered miraculous to the dwellers of Flatland.\n
  72. If a person acknowledges the existence of God, he cannot flatly deny the possibility that miracles have occurred. Now the question is not one of philosophy but of history. Miracles are possible, but is there enough evidence to show that any have happened?\n\n\n
  73. If a person acknowledges the existence of God, he cannot flatly deny the possibility that miracles have occurred. Now the question is not one of philosophy but of history. Miracles are possible, but is there enough evidence to show that any have happened?\n\n\n
  74. If a person acknowledges the existence of God, he cannot flatly deny the possibility that miracles have occurred. Now the question is not one of philosophy but of history. Miracles are possible, but is there enough evidence to show that any have happened?\n\n\n
  75. We have seen that the basic philosophical and scientific barrier to the miracles question is the existence of God. His existence opens up the possibility of miracles, but not all who believe in God admit that miracles have occurred.\n\n
  76. Speculation will never settle the question of whether God has miraculously intervened in human affairs. To find an answer we must use historical evidence. The Bible takes history seriously because God used history as His means of revealing His character and redemptive program to His people. God has worked through specific people and events, and the Bible's abundant use of geographic and chronological documentation ties God's revelation to the real world. \n
  77. Speculation will never settle the question of whether God has miraculously intervened in human affairs. To find an answer we must use historical evidence. The Bible takes history seriously because God used history as His means of revealing His character and redemptive program to His people. God has worked through specific people and events, and the Bible's abundant use of geographic and chronological documentation ties God's revelation to the real world. \n
  78. Speculation will never settle the question of whether God has miraculously intervened in human affairs. To find an answer we must use historical evidence. The Bible takes history seriously because God used history as His means of revealing His character and redemptive program to His people. God has worked through specific people and events, and the Bible's abundant use of geographic and chronological documentation ties God's revelation to the real world. \n
  79. God has worked through specific people and events, and the Bible's abundant use of geographic and chronological documentation ties God's revelation to the real world. The Bible is not a fabric of myths that took place "long ago and far away." Its reliable accounts usually tell us where and when the events took place, and often relate them to the affairs of other nations. The miracles in the Bible are recorded with the same attention to historical details as the nonmiraculous events. Again, this is quite unlike the scriptures of other religions.\n\n
  80. God has worked through specific people and events, and the Bible's abundant use of geographic and chronological documentation ties God's revelation to the real world. The Bible is not a fabric of myths that took place "long ago and far away." Its reliable accounts usually tell us where and when the events took place, and often relate them to the affairs of other nations. The miracles in the Bible are recorded with the same attention to historical details as the nonmiraculous events. Again, this is quite unlike the scriptures of other religions.\n\n
  81. God has worked through specific people and events, and the Bible's abundant use of geographic and chronological documentation ties God's revelation to the real world. The Bible is not a fabric of myths that took place "long ago and far away." Its reliable accounts usually tell us where and when the events took place, and often relate them to the affairs of other nations. The miracles in the Bible are recorded with the same attention to historical details as the nonmiraculous events. Again, this is quite unlike the scriptures of other religions.\n\n
  82. God has worked through specific people and events, and the Bible's abundant use of geographic and chronological documentation ties God's revelation to the real world. The Bible is not a fabric of myths that took place "long ago and far away." Its reliable accounts usually tell us where and when the events took place, and often relate them to the affairs of other nations. The miracles in the Bible are recorded with the same attention to historical details as the nonmiraculous events. Again, this is quite unlike the scriptures of other religions.\n\n
  83. \n
  84. \n
  85. There are those who argue that it is beneath God's dignity to overrule the normal patterns of nature in order to reveal Himself to men. But what better way can the sovereign God who created nature use to manifest Himself to humanity? Indeed, God's clearest manifestation to mankind was His personal revelation in Jesus Christ, the greatest model of humility and servanthood the world has ever known. But this Suffering Servant accomplished more miracles than any other man before or since (cf. John 20:30; 21:25).\n\n
  86. There are those who argue that it is beneath God's dignity to overrule the normal patterns of nature in order to reveal Himself to men. But what better way can the sovereign God who created nature use to manifest Himself to humanity? Indeed, God's clearest manifestation to mankind was His personal revelation in Jesus Christ, the greatest model of humility and servanthood the world has ever known. But this Suffering Servant accomplished more miracles than any other man before or since (cf. John 20:30; 21:25).\n\n
  87. There are those who argue that it is beneath God's dignity to overrule the normal patterns of nature in order to reveal Himself to men. But what better way can the sovereign God who created nature use to manifest Himself to humanity? Indeed, God's clearest manifestation to mankind was His personal revelation in Jesus Christ, the greatest model of humility and servanthood the world has ever known. But this Suffering Servant accomplished more miracles than any other man before or since (cf. John 20:30; 21:25).\n\n
  88. If we were restricted to God's general revelation of Himself in nature (natural theology), our knowledge of Him would be too limited and too speculative. It is through His special revelation in words and works that we can attain "the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus" (2 Tim. 3:15). The Bible claims that this special revelation includes miraculous events, and it would be improper to rule out the occurrence of miracles without an open investigation of these historical reports.\n\n\n
  89. If we were restricted to God's general revelation of Himself in nature (natural theology), our knowledge of Him would be too limited and too speculative. It is through His special revelation in words and works that we can attain "the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus" (2 Tim. 3:15). The Bible claims that this special revelation includes miraculous events, and it would be improper to rule out the occurrence of miracles without an open investigation of these historical reports.\n\n\n
  90. If we were restricted to God's general revelation of Himself in nature (natural theology), our knowledge of Him would be too limited and too speculative. It is through His special revelation in words and works that we can attain "the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus" (2 Tim. 3:15). The Bible claims that this special revelation includes miraculous events, and it would be improper to rule out the occurrence of miracles without an open investigation of these historical reports.\n\n\n
  91. The four Gospels record 35 of the many miracles that Christ performed in His brief public ministry. In these miracles, He demonstrated His authority over nature, disease, demons, and death. They always had a redemptive purpose and were never done to dazzle people or ostentatiously display His supernatural powers. They were, in fact, accomplished with great restraint, not pride, and the Gospel accounts tend to understate rather than overstate them. The miracles of Christ were done publicly, sometimes before thousands of eyewitnesses. It is also significant that many of these eyewitnesses were hostile to Christ, including the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians. None of Christ's critics ever denied that He performed these miracles. They could only challenge the source of power that He used (cf. Matt. 12:24) and His personal authority to do them (cf. Matt. 21:23). This is why Peter could boldly refer in his Acts 2 sermon on the Day of Pentecost to "Jesus the Nazarene, a The four Gospels record 35 of the many miracles that Christ performed in His brief public ministry. In these miracles, He demonstrated His authority over nature, disease, demons, and death. They always had a redemptive purpose and were never done to dazzle people or ostentatiously display His supernatural powers. They were, in fact, accomplished with great restraint, not pride, and the Gospel accounts tend to understate rather than overstate them. The miracles of Christ were done publicly, sometimes before thousands of eyewitnesses. It is also significant that many of these eyewitnesses were hostile to Christ, including the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians. None of Christ's critics ever denied that He performed these miracles. They could only challenge the source of power that He used (cf. Matt. 12:24) and His personal authority to do them (cf. Matt. 21:23). This is why Peter could boldly refer in his Acts 2 sermon on the Day of Pentecost to "Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst" (Acts 2:22).\n\n\n\n
  92. The four Gospels record 35 of the many miracles that Christ performed in His brief public ministry. In these miracles, He demonstrated His authority over nature, disease, demons, and death. They always had a redemptive purpose and were never done to dazzle people or ostentatiously display His supernatural powers. They were, in fact, accomplished with great restraint, not pride, and the Gospel accounts tend to understate rather than overstate them. The miracles of Christ were done publicly, sometimes before thousands of eyewitnesses. It is also significant that many of these eyewitnesses were hostile to Christ, including the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians. None of Christ's critics ever denied that He performed these miracles. They could only challenge the source of power that He used (cf. Matt. 12:24) and His personal authority to do them (cf. Matt. 21:23). This is why Peter could boldly refer in his Acts 2 sermon on the Day of Pentecost to "Jesus the Nazarene, a The four Gospels record 35 of the many miracles that Christ performed in His brief public ministry. In these miracles, He demonstrated His authority over nature, disease, demons, and death. They always had a redemptive purpose and were never done to dazzle people or ostentatiously display His supernatural powers. They were, in fact, accomplished with great restraint, not pride, and the Gospel accounts tend to understate rather than overstate them. The miracles of Christ were done publicly, sometimes before thousands of eyewitnesses. It is also significant that many of these eyewitnesses were hostile to Christ, including the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians. None of Christ's critics ever denied that He performed these miracles. They could only challenge the source of power that He used (cf. Matt. 12:24) and His personal authority to do them (cf. Matt. 21:23). This is why Peter could boldly refer in his Acts 2 sermon on the Day of Pentecost to "Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst" (Acts 2:22).\n\n\n\n
  93. The four Gospels record 35 of the many miracles that Christ performed in His brief public ministry. In these miracles, He demonstrated His authority over nature, disease, demons, and death. They always had a redemptive purpose and were never done to dazzle people or ostentatiously display His supernatural powers. They were, in fact, accomplished with great restraint, not pride, and the Gospel accounts tend to understate rather than overstate them. The miracles of Christ were done publicly, sometimes before thousands of eyewitnesses. It is also significant that many of these eyewitnesses were hostile to Christ, including the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians. None of Christ's critics ever denied that He performed these miracles. They could only challenge the source of power that He used (cf. Matt. 12:24) and His personal authority to do them (cf. Matt. 21:23). This is why Peter could boldly refer in his Acts 2 sermon on the Day of Pentecost to "Jesus the Nazarene, a The four Gospels record 35 of the many miracles that Christ performed in His brief public ministry. In these miracles, He demonstrated His authority over nature, disease, demons, and death. They always had a redemptive purpose and were never done to dazzle people or ostentatiously display His supernatural powers. They were, in fact, accomplished with great restraint, not pride, and the Gospel accounts tend to understate rather than overstate them. The miracles of Christ were done publicly, sometimes before thousands of eyewitnesses. It is also significant that many of these eyewitnesses were hostile to Christ, including the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians. None of Christ's critics ever denied that He performed these miracles. They could only challenge the source of power that He used (cf. Matt. 12:24) and His personal authority to do them (cf. Matt. 21:23). This is why Peter could boldly refer in his Acts 2 sermon on the Day of Pentecost to "Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst" (Acts 2:22).\n\n\n\n
  94. The four Gospels record 35 of the many miracles that Christ performed in His brief public ministry. In these miracles, He demonstrated His authority over nature, disease, demons, and death. They always had a redemptive purpose and were never done to dazzle people or ostentatiously display His supernatural powers. They were, in fact, accomplished with great restraint, not pride, and the Gospel accounts tend to understate rather than overstate them. The miracles of Christ were done publicly, sometimes before thousands of eyewitnesses. It is also significant that many of these eyewitnesses were hostile to Christ, including the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians. None of Christ's critics ever denied that He performed these miracles. They could only challenge the source of power that He used (cf. Matt. 12:24) and His personal authority to do them (cf. Matt. 21:23). This is why Peter could boldly refer in his Acts 2 sermon on the Day of Pentecost to "Jesus the Nazarene, a The four Gospels record 35 of the many miracles that Christ performed in His brief public ministry. In these miracles, He demonstrated His authority over nature, disease, demons, and death. They always had a redemptive purpose and were never done to dazzle people or ostentatiously display His supernatural powers. They were, in fact, accomplished with great restraint, not pride, and the Gospel accounts tend to understate rather than overstate them. The miracles of Christ were done publicly, sometimes before thousands of eyewitnesses. It is also significant that many of these eyewitnesses were hostile to Christ, including the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians. None of Christ's critics ever denied that He performed these miracles. They could only challenge the source of power that He used (cf. Matt. 12:24) and His personal authority to do them (cf. Matt. 21:23). This is why Peter could boldly refer in his Acts 2 sermon on the Day of Pentecost to "Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst" (Acts 2:22).\n\n\n\n
  95. The four Gospels record 35 of the many miracles that Christ performed in His brief public ministry. In these miracles, He demonstrated His authority over nature, disease, demons, and death. They always had a redemptive purpose and were never done to dazzle people or ostentatiously display His supernatural powers. They were, in fact, accomplished with great restraint, not pride, and the Gospel accounts tend to understate rather than overstate them. The miracles of Christ were done publicly, sometimes before thousands of eyewitnesses. It is also significant that many of these eyewitnesses were hostile to Christ, including the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians. None of Christ's critics ever denied that He performed these miracles. They could only challenge the source of power that He used (cf. Matt. 12:24) and His personal authority to do them (cf. Matt. 21:23). This is why Peter could boldly refer in his Acts 2 sermon on the Day of Pentecost to "Jesus the Nazarene, a The four Gospels record 35 of the many miracles that Christ performed in His brief public ministry. In these miracles, He demonstrated His authority over nature, disease, demons, and death. They always had a redemptive purpose and were never done to dazzle people or ostentatiously display His supernatural powers. They were, in fact, accomplished with great restraint, not pride, and the Gospel accounts tend to understate rather than overstate them. The miracles of Christ were done publicly, sometimes before thousands of eyewitnesses. It is also significant that many of these eyewitnesses were hostile to Christ, including the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians. None of Christ's critics ever denied that He performed these miracles. They could only challenge the source of power that He used (cf. Matt. 12:24) and His personal authority to do them (cf. Matt. 21:23). This is why Peter could boldly refer in his Acts 2 sermon on the Day of Pentecost to "Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst" (Acts 2:22).\n\n\n\n
  96. The miracles of Christ clearly set Him apart from the founders and leaders of other world religions. Because of His uniqueness, attempts have been made to discredit His miracles by offering natural explanations for His supernatural accomplishments. For example, He didn't actually walk on the water of the Sea of Galilee —He was really walking on a sandbar that was just below the water. Or, He didn't feed the multitudes by multiplying the five loaves and two fish—when He shared the lad's lunch, the people were fed by following this example of sharing their food with one another. Of course, explanations such as these can be created only by doing a severe injustice to the text. Not only are the passages distorted, but the people themselves would have to be dolts to accept these things as miracles. The latter is precisely what is implied by some critics who are guilty of what C.S. Lewis called "chronological snobbery." This is the arrogant assumption that people in previous ages were so credulous that they could be duped into thinking that practically anything was a miracle.\n\n
  97. The miracles of Christ clearly set Him apart from the founders and leaders of other world religions. Because of His uniqueness, attempts have been made to discredit His miracles by offering natural explanations for His supernatural accomplishments. For example, He didn't actually walk on the water of the Sea of Galilee —He was really walking on a sandbar that was just below the water. Or, He didn't feed the multitudes by multiplying the five loaves and two fish—when He shared the lad's lunch, the people were fed by following this example of sharing their food with one another. Of course, explanations such as these can be created only by doing a severe injustice to the text. Not only are the passages distorted, but the people themselves would have to be dolts to accept these things as miracles. The latter is precisely what is implied by some critics who are guilty of what C.S. Lewis called "chronological snobbery." This is the arrogant assumption that people in previous ages were so credulous that they could be duped into thinking that practically anything was a miracle.\n\n
  98. The miracles of Christ clearly set Him apart from the founders and leaders of other world religions. Because of His uniqueness, attempts have been made to discredit His miracles by offering natural explanations for His supernatural accomplishments. For example, He didn't actually walk on the water of the Sea of Galilee —He was really walking on a sandbar that was just below the water. Or, He didn't feed the multitudes by multiplying the five loaves and two fish—when He shared the lad's lunch, the people were fed by following this example of sharing their food with one another. Of course, explanations such as these can be created only by doing a severe injustice to the text. Not only are the passages distorted, but the people themselves would have to be dolts to accept these things as miracles. The latter is precisely what is implied by some critics who are guilty of what C.S. Lewis called "chronological snobbery." This is the arrogant assumption that people in previous ages were so credulous that they could be duped into thinking that practically anything was a miracle.\n\n
  99. The miracles of Christ clearly set Him apart from the founders and leaders of other world religions. Because of His uniqueness, attempts have been made to discredit His miracles by offering natural explanations for His supernatural accomplishments. For example, He didn't actually walk on the water of the Sea of Galilee —He was really walking on a sandbar that was just below the water. Or, He didn't feed the multitudes by multiplying the five loaves and two fish—when He shared the lad's lunch, the people were fed by following this example of sharing their food with one another. Of course, explanations such as these can be created only by doing a severe injustice to the text. Not only are the passages distorted, but the people themselves would have to be dolts to accept these things as miracles. The latter is precisely what is implied by some critics who are guilty of what C.S. Lewis called "chronological snobbery." This is the arrogant assumption that people in previous ages were so credulous that they could be duped into thinking that practically anything was a miracle.\n\n
  100. Of all His miracles, Christ singled out one as the greatest sign to unbelievers: "the sign of Jonah the prophet" (the Resurrection; Matt. 12:39-40). The historical evidence for the Resurrection is very strong, and because of its significant personal implications, this is the miracle to use when answering the question, "Why believe in miracles?" If the abundant evidence convinces a person that the Resurrection took place, the miracles question must be answered in the affirmative. See the appendix to this chapter for a method, along with a flow chart, of presenting the case for the Resurrection.\n\nIt is better to use the miracles of Christ and the Resurrection in particular to answer this question than to appeal to contemporary examples. The Bible needs to be presented as the believer's final authority for truth. (The Maybe option to the miracles question is diagramed in Chart 14).\n\nMatt. 12:38 ¶ Then some of the scribes and Pharisees said to Him, “Teacher, we want to see a sign from You.” \nMatt. 12:39 But He answered and said to them, “An evil and adulterous generation craves for a sign; and yet no sign will be given to it but the sign of Jonah the prophet; \nMatt. 12:40 for just as JONAH WAS THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS IN THE BELLY OF THE SEA MONSTER, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. \n\n
  101. Of all His miracles, Christ singled out one as the greatest sign to unbelievers: "the sign of Jonah the prophet" (the Resurrection; Matt. 12:39-40). The historical evidence for the Resurrection is very strong, and because of its significant personal implications, this is the miracle to use when answering the question, "Why believe in miracles?" If the abundant evidence convinces a person that the Resurrection took place, the miracles question must be answered in the affirmative. See the appendix to this chapter for a method, along with a flow chart, of presenting the case for the Resurrection.\n\nIt is better to use the miracles of Christ and the Resurrection in particular to answer this question than to appeal to contemporary examples. The Bible needs to be presented as the believer's final authority for truth. (The Maybe option to the miracles question is diagramed in Chart 14).\n\nMatt. 12:38 ¶ Then some of the scribes and Pharisees said to Him, “Teacher, we want to see a sign from You.” \nMatt. 12:39 But He answered and said to them, “An evil and adulterous generation craves for a sign; and yet no sign will be given to it but the sign of Jonah the prophet; \nMatt. 12:40 for just as JONAH WAS THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS IN THE BELLY OF THE SEA MONSTER, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. \n\n
  102. Of all His miracles, Christ singled out one as the greatest sign to unbelievers: "the sign of Jonah the prophet" (the Resurrection; Matt. 12:39-40). The historical evidence for the Resurrection is very strong, and because of its significant personal implications, this is the miracle to use when answering the question, "Why believe in miracles?" If the abundant evidence convinces a person that the Resurrection took place, the miracles question must be answered in the affirmative. See the appendix to this chapter for a method, along with a flow chart, of presenting the case for the Resurrection.\n\nIt is better to use the miracles of Christ and the Resurrection in particular to answer this question than to appeal to contemporary examples. The Bible needs to be presented as the believer's final authority for truth. (The Maybe option to the miracles question is diagramed in Chart 14).\n\nMatt. 12:38 ¶ Then some of the scribes and Pharisees said to Him, “Teacher, we want to see a sign from You.” \nMatt. 12:39 But He answered and said to them, “An evil and adulterous generation craves for a sign; and yet no sign will be given to it but the sign of Jonah the prophet; \nMatt. 12:40 for just as JONAH WAS THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS IN THE BELLY OF THE SEA MONSTER, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. \n\n
  103. \n
  104. Even if a person admits that the Resurrection and other miraculous events in the Bible took place, this is not enough. Many believe these things and still refuse to place their trust in Christ. The miracles in the Bible were signs that authenticated God's message and messengers, but those who saw them didn't always respond with faith.\n\nThe Scriptures make it clear that the heart of an unregenerate person is at enmity with God and refuses to bow to His revelation and authority. This is why the Council of Sanhedrin sought to suppress the message about the resurrected Christ even though they could not deny the Resurrection or Peter's healing of the man who had been lame from birth (Acts 4:16-17; cf. Luke 16:31; John 12:10-11). Only the Holy Spirit's work of convicting unbelievers of "sin, and righteousness, and judgment" (John 16:8) can break through the spiritual blindness of non-Christians.\n\n\n\n
  105. Even if a person admits that the Resurrection and other miraculous events in the Bible took place, this is not enough. Many believe these things and still refuse to place their trust in Christ. The miracles in the Bible were signs that authenticated God's message and messengers, but those who saw them didn't always respond with faith.\n\nThe Scriptures make it clear that the heart of an unregenerate person is at enmity with God and refuses to bow to His revelation and authority. This is why the Council of Sanhedrin sought to suppress the message about the resurrected Christ even though they could not deny the Resurrection or Peter's healing of the man who had been lame from birth (Acts 4:16-17; cf. Luke 16:31; John 12:10-11). Only the Holy Spirit's work of convicting unbelievers of "sin, and righteousness, and judgment" (John 16:8) can break through the spiritual blindness of non-Christians.\n\n\n\n
  106. Even if a person admits that the Resurrection and other miraculous events in the Bible took place, this is not enough. Many believe these things and still refuse to place their trust in Christ. The miracles in the Bible were signs that authenticated God's message and messengers, but those who saw them didn't always respond with faith.\n\nThe Scriptures make it clear that the heart of an unregenerate person is at enmity with God and refuses to bow to His revelation and authority. This is why the Council of Sanhedrin sought to suppress the message about the resurrected Christ even though they could not deny the Resurrection or Peter's healing of the man who had been lame from birth (Acts 4:16-17; cf. Luke 16:31; John 12:10-11). Only the Holy Spirit's work of convicting unbelievers of "sin, and righteousness, and judgment" (John 16:8) can break through the spiritual blindness of non-Christians.\n\n\n\n
  107. Even if a person admits that the Resurrection and other miraculous events in the Bible took place, this is not enough. Many believe these things and still refuse to place their trust in Christ. The miracles in the Bible were signs that authenticated God's message and messengers, but those who saw them didn't always respond with faith.\n\nThe Scriptures make it clear that the heart of an unregenerate person is at enmity with God and refuses to bow to His revelation and authority. This is why the Council of Sanhedrin sought to suppress the message about the resurrected Christ even though they could not deny the Resurrection or Peter's healing of the man who had been lame from birth (Acts 4:16-17; cf. Luke 16:31; John 12:10-11). Only the Holy Spirit's work of convicting unbelievers of "sin, and righteousness, and judgment" (John 16:8) can break through the spiritual blindness of non-Christians.\n\n\n\n
  108. Some object that God's revelation is too remote. If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a more direct way. In effect, the objector wants God to clobber him into the kingdom by forcing him to believe. What would it take —a cloud formation spelling out John 3:16? A glowing angel hovering above his bed at 3 a.m.? Perhaps a fulfillment of Philip's modest request would do: "Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us" (John 14:8). God, however, has already done more than enough. When Jesus Christ returns to earth, He will not come to offer salvation but to judge those who have already rejected God's offer of salvation through faith in His finished work.\n\n
  109. Some object that God's revelation is too remote. If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a more direct way. In effect, the objector wants God to clobber him into the kingdom by forcing him to believe. What would it take —a cloud formation spelling out John 3:16? A glowing angel hovering above his bed at 3 a.m.? Perhaps a fulfillment of Philip's modest request would do: "Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us" (John 14:8). God, however, has already done more than enough. When Jesus Christ returns to earth, He will not come to offer salvation but to judge those who have already rejected God's offer of salvation through faith in His finished work.\n\n
  110. Some object that God's revelation is too remote. If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a more direct way. In effect, the objector wants God to clobber him into the kingdom by forcing him to believe. What would it take —a cloud formation spelling out John 3:16? A glowing angel hovering above his bed at 3 a.m.? Perhaps a fulfillment of Philip's modest request would do: "Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us" (John 14:8). God, however, has already done more than enough. When Jesus Christ returns to earth, He will not come to offer salvation but to judge those who have already rejected God's offer of salvation through faith in His finished work.\n\n
  111. Some object that God's revelation is too remote. If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a more direct way. In effect, the objector wants God to clobber him into the kingdom by forcing him to believe. What would it take —a cloud formation spelling out John 3:16? A glowing angel hovering above his bed at 3 a.m.? Perhaps a fulfillment of Philip's modest request would do: "Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us" (John 14:8). God, however, has already done more than enough. When Jesus Christ returns to earth, He will not come to offer salvation but to judge those who have already rejected God's offer of salvation through faith in His finished work.\n\n
  112. Some object that God's revelation is too remote. If He wants people to believe, He should reveal Himself in a more direct way. In effect, the objector wants God to clobber him into the kingdom by forcing him to believe. What would it take —a cloud formation spelling out John 3:16? A glowing angel hovering above his bed at 3 a.m.? Perhaps a fulfillment of Philip's modest request would do: "Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us" (John 14:8). God, however, has already done more than enough. When Jesus Christ returns to earth, He will not come to offer salvation but to judge those who have already rejected God's offer of salvation through faith in His finished work.\n\n
  113. Miracles cannot create faith, but they can be used by the Holy Spirit as catalysts to faith, especially when a person begins to consider the claims and credentials of Christ (see chap. 8). Christ's miracles (especially the Resurrection) demonstrate the validity of His claims, and if His claims are true, they have profound implications for the eternal destiny of every human being. This naturally leads into a presentation of the Gospel and the biblical meaning of belief in Jesus Christ (see chap. 13).\n\n\n
  114. Miracles cannot create faith, but they can be used by the Holy Spirit as catalysts to faith, especially when a person begins to consider the claims and credentials of Christ (see chap. 8). Christ's miracles (especially the Resurrection) demonstrate the validity of His claims, and if His claims are true, they have profound implications for the eternal destiny of every human being. This naturally leads into a presentation of the Gospel and the biblical meaning of belief in Jesus Christ (see chap. 13).\n\n\n
  115. Miracles cannot create faith, but they can be used by the Holy Spirit as catalysts to faith, especially when a person begins to consider the claims and credentials of Christ (see chap. 8). Christ's miracles (especially the Resurrection) demonstrate the validity of His claims, and if His claims are true, they have profound implications for the eternal destiny of every human being. This naturally leads into a presentation of the Gospel and the biblical meaning of belief in Jesus Christ (see chap. 13).\n\n\n
  116. Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640)\nThe Resurrection of Christ\nOil on panel, c.1612\nO.L. Vrouwekathedraal, Antwerp\nSource: http://www.artrenewal.org/asp/database/image.asp?id=1303\n
  117. The New Testament makes it clear that the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ is one of the pillars that supports the Christian faith. \n
  118. The New Testament makes it clear that the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ is one of the pillars that supports the Christian faith. Paul told the Corinthians: "If Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins. Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. If we have hoped in Christ in this life only, we are of all men most to be pitied" (1 Cor. 15:17-19). The preaching of the apostles in Acts revolved around the hub of the historical Resurrection (e.g., Acts 1:22; 2:24-32; 3:15; 4:10; 10:40-41; 13:30-37; 17:31; 26:6-8, 23). Without the resurrection of Christ, Christianity would be unable to withstand critical attacks.\n\n
  119. The New Testament makes it clear that the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ is one of the pillars that supports the Christian faith. Paul told the Corinthians: "If Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins. Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. If we have hoped in Christ in this life only, we are of all men most to be pitied" (1 Cor. 15:17-19). The preaching of the apostles in Acts revolved around the hub of the historical Resurrection (e.g., Acts 1:22; 2:24-32; 3:15; 4:10; 10:40-41; 13:30-37; 17:31; 26:6-8, 23). Without the resurrection of Christ, Christianity would be unable to withstand critical attacks.\n\n
  120. The New Testament makes it clear that the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ is one of the pillars that supports the Christian faith. Paul told the Corinthians: "If Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins. Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. If we have hoped in Christ in this life only, we are of all men most to be pitied" (1 Cor. 15:17-19). The preaching of the apostles in Acts revolved around the hub of the historical Resurrection (e.g., Acts 1:22; 2:24-32; 3:15; 4:10; 10:40-41; 13:30-37; 17:31; 26:6-8, 23). Without the resurrection of Christ, Christianity would be unable to withstand critical attacks.\n\n
  121. A number of thinkers who sought to disprove the Resurrection and thus invalidate Christianity found themselves confronted instead by such a weight of evidence in favor of the Resurrection that it forced them to bend their knees before the living Christ. A number of years ago, attorney Frank Morison planned to write a book that would lay the myth of the Resurrection to rest. But his book, Who Moved the Stone? did precisely the opposite, and Morison was converted to Christianity by the historical evidence for the empty tomb.\n\nGeneral Lew Wallace decided to create a historical novel about a Jewish contemporary of Jesus. Something quite unexpected took place, however, as he researched the background for the book. The historical evidence for the Resurrection overwhelmed him, and he wrote Ben Hur as a new believer in Christ.\n\nTwo relatively recent examples are C.S. Lewis and Malcolm Muggeridge. Lewis records his reluctant trek from atheism to Christianity in his autobiography, Surprised by Joy. He did not want to meet Christ, but the evidence brought him "kicking and screaming" into the kingdom. Muggeridge, a former editor of Punch magazine and a provoking analyst of modern culture, is a recent convert to Christianity. His journey from skepticism is traced in Jesus Rediscovered and Chronicles of Wasted Time.\n\n\n
  122. A number of thinkers who sought to disprove the Resurrection and thus invalidate Christianity found themselves confronted instead by such a weight of evidence in favor of the Resurrection that it forced them to bend their knees before the living Christ. A number of years ago, attorney Frank Morison planned to write a book that would lay the myth of the Resurrection to rest. But his book, Who Moved the Stone? did precisely the opposite, and Morison was converted to Christianity by the historical evidence for the empty tomb.\n\nGeneral Lew Wallace decided to create a historical novel about a Jewish contemporary of Jesus. Something quite unexpected took place, however, as he researched the background for the book. The historical evidence for the Resurrection overwhelmed him, and he wrote Ben Hur as a new believer in Christ.\n\nTwo relatively recent examples are C.S. Lewis and Malcolm Muggeridge. Lewis records his reluctant trek from atheism to Christianity in his autobiography, Surprised by Joy. He did not want to meet Christ, but the evidence brought him "kicking and screaming" into the kingdom. Muggeridge, a former editor of Punch magazine and a provoking analyst of modern culture, is a recent convert to Christianity. His journey from skepticism is traced in Jesus Rediscovered and Chronicles of Wasted Time.\n\n\n
  123. A number of thinkers who sought to disprove the Resurrection and thus invalidate Christianity found themselves confronted instead by such a weight of evidence in favor of the Resurrection that it forced them to bend their knees before the living Christ. A number of years ago, attorney Frank Morison planned to write a book that would lay the myth of the Resurrection to rest. But his book, Who Moved the Stone? did precisely the opposite, and Morison was converted to Christianity by the historical evidence for the empty tomb.\n\nGeneral Lew Wallace decided to create a historical novel about a Jewish contemporary of Jesus. Something quite unexpected took place, however, as he researched the background for the book. The historical evidence for the Resurrection overwhelmed him, and he wrote Ben Hur as a new believer in Christ.\n\nTwo relatively recent examples are C.S. Lewis and Malcolm Muggeridge. Lewis records his reluctant trek from atheism to Christianity in his autobiography, Surprised by Joy. He did not want to meet Christ, but the evidence brought him "kicking and screaming" into the kingdom. Muggeridge, a former editor of Punch magazine and a provoking analyst of modern culture, is a recent convert to Christianity. His journey from skepticism is traced in Jesus Rediscovered and Chronicles of Wasted Time.\n\n\n
  124. A number of thinkers who sought to disprove the Resurrection and thus invalidate Christianity found themselves confronted instead by such a weight of evidence in favor of the Resurrection that it forced them to bend their knees before the living Christ. A number of years ago, attorney Frank Morison planned to write a book that would lay the myth of the Resurrection to rest. But his book, Who Moved the Stone? did precisely the opposite, and Morison was converted to Christianity by the historical evidence for the empty tomb.\n\nGeneral Lew Wallace decided to create a historical novel about a Jewish contemporary of Jesus. Something quite unexpected took place, however, as he researched the background for the book. The historical evidence for the Resurrection overwhelmed him, and he wrote Ben Hur as a new believer in Christ.\n\nTwo relatively recent examples are C.S. Lewis and Malcolm Muggeridge. Lewis records his reluctant trek from atheism to Christianity in his autobiography, Surprised by Joy. He did not want to meet Christ, but the evidence brought him "kicking and screaming" into the kingdom. Muggeridge, a former editor of Punch magazine and a provoking analyst of modern culture, is a recent convert to Christianity. His journey from skepticism is traced in Jesus Rediscovered and Chronicles of Wasted Time.\n\n\n
  125. \n
  126. \n
  127. \n
  128. \n
  129. \n
  130. (1) Jesus suffered death by crucifixion. He endured six trials (three religious and three civil) that stretched through the night and into the morning. As a result, men cruelly beat Him about the face and body, plucked out His beard, jammed a crown of thorns into His scalp, and scourged Him by many lashes from the mutilating Roman whips. After His tormentors forced Jesus to carry the heavy crossbar for His crucifixion on His bleeding back, they drove iron nails through His hands and feet to secure Him to the cross. After His death, one of the executioners thrust a spear into His side, and "blood and water" immediately issued forth. Then the centurion pronounced Jesus dead (Mark 15:44-45).\n\n\n
  131. (1) Jesus suffered death by crucifixion. He endured six trials (three religious and three civil) that stretched through the night and into the morning. As a result, men cruelly beat Him about the face and body, plucked out His beard, jammed a crown of thorns into His scalp, and scourged Him by many lashes from the mutilating Roman whips. After His tormentors forced Jesus to carry the heavy crossbar for His crucifixion on His bleeding back, they drove iron nails through His hands and feet to secure Him to the cross. After His death, one of the executioners thrust a spear into His side, and "blood and water" immediately issued forth. Then the centurion pronounced Jesus dead (Mark 15:44-45).\n\n\n
  132. (1) Jesus suffered death by crucifixion. He endured six trials (three religious and three civil) that stretched through the night and into the morning. As a result, men cruelly beat Him about the face and body, plucked out His beard, jammed a crown of thorns into His scalp, and scourged Him by many lashes from the mutilating Roman whips. After His tormentors forced Jesus to carry the heavy crossbar for His crucifixion on His bleeding back, they drove iron nails through His hands and feet to secure Him to the cross. After His death, one of the executioners thrust a spear into His side, and "blood and water" immediately issued forth. Then the centurion pronounced Jesus dead (Mark 15:44-45).\n\n\n
  133. (1) Jesus suffered death by crucifixion. He endured six trials (three religious and three civil) that stretched through the night and into the morning. As a result, men cruelly beat Him about the face and body, plucked out His beard, jammed a crown of thorns into His scalp, and scourged Him by many lashes from the mutilating Roman whips. After His tormentors forced Jesus to carry the heavy crossbar for His crucifixion on His bleeding back, they drove iron nails through His hands and feet to secure Him to the cross. After His death, one of the executioners thrust a spear into His side, and "blood and water" immediately issued forth. Then the centurion pronounced Jesus dead (Mark 15:44-45).\n\n\n
  134. (1) Jesus suffered death by crucifixion. He endured six trials (three religious and three civil) that stretched through the night and into the morning. As a result, men cruelly beat Him about the face and body, plucked out His beard, jammed a crown of thorns into His scalp, and scourged Him by many lashes from the mutilating Roman whips. After His tormentors forced Jesus to carry the heavy crossbar for His crucifixion on His bleeding back, they drove iron nails through His hands and feet to secure Him to the cross. After His death, one of the executioners thrust a spear into His side, and "blood and water" immediately issued forth. Then the centurion pronounced Jesus dead (Mark 15:44-45).\n\n\n
  135. (2) Friends placed Jesus' body in a securely guarded tomb. Joseph of Arimathea's tomb was hewn out of solid rock and had a single entrance that was closed off by rolling an "extremely large" (Mark 16:4) stone in front of it. The stone fit into a groove and would have to be rolled up an incline by several men in order to gain access to the tomb. Friends bound Jesus' body in linen wrappings along with about 100 pounds of spices (John 20:39-40), and Pilate ordered a guard of soldiers (probably Roman) stationed in front of the tomb when the stone was put in place (Matt. 27:65-66). A Roman seal on the stone certified that the body was inside and that no one had tampered with the tomb.\n\n
  136. (2) Friends placed Jesus' body in a securely guarded tomb. Joseph of Arimathea's tomb was hewn out of solid rock and had a single entrance that was closed off by rolling an "extremely large" (Mark 16:4) stone in front of it. The stone fit into a groove and would have to be rolled up an incline by several men in order to gain access to the tomb. Friends bound Jesus' body in linen wrappings along with about 100 pounds of spices (John 20:39-40), and Pilate ordered a guard of soldiers (probably Roman) stationed in front of the tomb when the stone was put in place (Matt. 27:65-66). A Roman seal on the stone certified that the body was inside and that no one had tampered with the tomb.\n\n
  137. (2) Friends placed Jesus' body in a securely guarded tomb. Joseph of Arimathea's tomb was hewn out of solid rock and had a single entrance that was closed off by rolling an "extremely large" (Mark 16:4) stone in front of it. The stone fit into a groove and would have to be rolled up an incline by several men in order to gain access to the tomb. Friends bound Jesus' body in linen wrappings along with about 100 pounds of spices (John 20:39-40), and Pilate ordered a guard of soldiers (probably Roman) stationed in front of the tomb when the stone was put in place (Matt. 27:65-66). A Roman seal on the stone certified that the body was inside and that no one had tampered with the tomb.\n\n
  138. (2) Friends placed Jesus' body in a securely guarded tomb. Joseph of Arimathea's tomb was hewn out of solid rock and had a single entrance that was closed off by rolling an "extremely large" (Mark 16:4) stone in front of it. The stone fit into a groove and would have to be rolled up an incline by several men in order to gain access to the tomb. Friends bound Jesus' body in linen wrappings along with about 100 pounds of spices (John 20:39-40), and Pilate ordered a guard of soldiers (probably Roman) stationed in front of the tomb when the stone was put in place (Matt. 27:65-66). A Roman seal on the stone certified that the body was inside and that no one had tampered with the tomb.\n\n
  139. (2) Friends placed Jesus' body in a securely guarded tomb. Joseph of Arimathea's tomb was hewn out of solid rock and had a single entrance that was closed off by rolling an "extremely large" (Mark 16:4) stone in front of it. The stone fit into a groove and would have to be rolled up an incline by several men in order to gain access to the tomb. Friends bound Jesus' body in linen wrappings along with about 100 pounds of spices (John 20:39-40), and Pilate ordered a guard of soldiers (probably Roman) stationed in front of the tomb when the stone was put in place (Matt. 27:65-66). A Roman seal on the stone certified that the body was inside and that no one had tampered with the tomb.\n\n
  140. \n
  141. \n
  142. (4) Jesus' friend Mary Magdalene and other followers found the tomb empty on the third day. This fact was disputed in the past, but recent studies even by critical theologians have led to a growing scholarly consensus that the tomb was indeed empty. This was clearly admitted even by Jesus' enemies, because the chief priests and elders bribed the guard to say that the body was stolen by His disciples (Matt. 28:11-15). Certainly if the tomb were still occupied when the word about His resurrection began to spread, the authorities would have exhumed the body and put it on public display to quell the insidious rumors. But no body was ever produced and the empty tomb was never denied.\n\n
  143. (4) Jesus' friend Mary Magdalene and other followers found the tomb empty on the third day. This fact was disputed in the past, but recent studies even by critical theologians have led to a growing scholarly consensus that the tomb was indeed empty. This was clearly admitted even by Jesus' enemies, because the chief priests and elders bribed the guard to say that the body was stolen by His disciples (Matt. 28:11-15). Certainly if the tomb were still occupied when the word about His resurrection began to spread, the authorities would have exhumed the body and put it on public display to quell the insidious rumors. But no body was ever produced and the empty tomb was never denied.\n\n
  144. (4) Jesus' friend Mary Magdalene and other followers found the tomb empty on the third day. This fact was disputed in the past, but recent studies even by critical theologians have led to a growing scholarly consensus that the tomb was indeed empty. This was clearly admitted even by Jesus' enemies, because the chief priests and elders bribed the guard to say that the body was stolen by His disciples (Matt. 28:11-15). Certainly if the tomb were still occupied when the word about His resurrection began to spread, the authorities would have exhumed the body and put it on public display to quell the insidious rumors. But no body was ever produced and the empty tomb was never denied.\n\n
  145. (4) Jesus' friend Mary Magdalene and other followers found the tomb empty on the third day. This fact was disputed in the past, but recent studies even by critical theologians have led to a growing scholarly consensus that the tomb was indeed empty. This was clearly admitted even by Jesus' enemies, because the chief priests and elders bribed the guard to say that the body was stolen by His disciples (Matt. 28:11-15). Certainly if the tomb were still occupied when the word about His resurrection began to spread, the authorities would have exhumed the body and put it on public display to quell the insidious rumors. But no body was ever produced and the empty tomb was never denied.\n\n
  146. (5) The Roman seal was broken and the large stone was moved away from the sepulcher.\n\n\n
  147. (6) The guard left the empty tomb and reported what had happened to the chief priests. They were given a large bribe and promised protection from punishment by Pilate who could have had them executed for their failure.\n\n\n\n
  148. (6) The guard left the empty tomb and reported what had happened to the chief priests. They were given a large bribe and promised protection from punishment by Pilate who could have had them executed for their failure.\n\n\n\n
  149. (6) The guard left the empty tomb and reported what had happened to the chief priests. They were given a large bribe and promised protection from punishment by Pilate who could have had them executed for their failure.\n\n\n\n
  150. (7) The graveclothes of Jesus were found empty yet undisturbed (John 20:3-8).\n\n\n
  151. (7) The graveclothes of Jesus were found empty yet undisturbed (John 20:3-8).\n\n\n
  152. (7) The graveclothes of Jesus were found empty yet undisturbed (John 20:3-8).\n\n\n
  153. (7) The graveclothes of Jesus were found empty yet undisturbed (John 20:3-8).\n\n\n
  154. (7) The graveclothes of Jesus were found empty yet undisturbed (John 20:3-8).\n\n\n
  155. (7) The graveclothes of Jesus were found empty yet undisturbed (John 20:3-8).\n\n\n
  156. (8) The followers of Jesus reported that Jesus appeared to them in bodily form on several occasions. These were eyewitness accounts, and they involved a variety of circumstances (e.g., indoors and outdoors) and people. On one occasion, Jesus appeared to more than 500 people at once (1 Cor. 15:6). In these appearances, Christ stressed that He was in a real body and offered ample demonstration of this truth. The first witnesses were women, and it is unlikely that a fabricated account would have included this since the Jewish courts regarded the testimony of women as unreliable. Jesus also appeared to His brother James and later to Paul. In every case, the lives of these witnesses were radically transformed, and this is especially difficult to explain in the case of Paul apart from the Resurrection.\n\n\n\n
  157. (8) The followers of Jesus reported that Jesus appeared to them in bodily form on several occasions. These were eyewitness accounts, and they involved a variety of circumstances (e.g., indoors and outdoors) and people. On one occasion, Jesus appeared to more than 500 people at once (1 Cor. 15:6). In these appearances, Christ stressed that He was in a real body and offered ample demonstration of this truth. The first witnesses were women, and it is unlikely that a fabricated account would have included this since the Jewish courts regarded the testimony of women as unreliable. Jesus also appeared to His brother James and later to Paul. In every case, the lives of these witnesses were radically transformed, and this is especially difficult to explain in the case of Paul apart from the Resurrection.\n\n\n\n
  158. (8) The followers of Jesus reported that Jesus appeared to them in bodily form on several occasions. These were eyewitness accounts, and they involved a variety of circumstances (e.g., indoors and outdoors) and people. On one occasion, Jesus appeared to more than 500 people at once (1 Cor. 15:6). In these appearances, Christ stressed that He was in a real body and offered ample demonstration of this truth. The first witnesses were women, and it is unlikely that a fabricated account would have included this since the Jewish courts regarded the testimony of women as unreliable. Jesus also appeared to His brother James and later to Paul. In every case, the lives of these witnesses were radically transformed, and this is especially difficult to explain in the case of Paul apart from the Resurrection.\n\n\n\n
  159. (8) The followers of Jesus reported that Jesus appeared to them in bodily form on several occasions. These were eyewitness accounts, and they involved a variety of circumstances (e.g., indoors and outdoors) and people. On one occasion, Jesus appeared to more than 500 people at once (1 Cor. 15:6). In these appearances, Christ stressed that He was in a real body and offered ample demonstration of this truth. The first witnesses were women, and it is unlikely that a fabricated account would have included this since the Jewish courts regarded the testimony of women as unreliable. Jesus also appeared to His brother James and later to Paul. In every case, the lives of these witnesses were radically transformed, and this is especially difficult to explain in the case of Paul apart from the Resurrection.\n\n\n\n
  160. (8) The followers of Jesus reported that Jesus appeared to them in bodily form on several occasions. These were eyewitness accounts, and they involved a variety of circumstances (e.g., indoors and outdoors) and people. On one occasion, Jesus appeared to more than 500 people at once (1 Cor. 15:6). In these appearances, Christ stressed that He was in a real body and offered ample demonstration of this truth. The first witnesses were women, and it is unlikely that a fabricated account would have included this since the Jewish courts regarded the testimony of women as unreliable. Jesus also appeared to His brother James and later to Paul. In every case, the lives of these witnesses were radically transformed, and this is especially difficult to explain in the case of Paul apart from the Resurrection.\n\n\n\n
  161. (8) The followers of Jesus reported that Jesus appeared to them in bodily form on several occasions. These were eyewitness accounts, and they involved a variety of circumstances (e.g., indoors and outdoors) and people. On one occasion, Jesus appeared to more than 500 people at once (1 Cor. 15:6). In these appearances, Christ stressed that He was in a real body and offered ample demonstration of this truth. The first witnesses were women, and it is unlikely that a fabricated account would have included this since the Jewish courts regarded the testimony of women as unreliable. Jesus also appeared to His brother James and later to Paul. In every case, the lives of these witnesses were radically transformed, and this is especially difficult to explain in the case of Paul apart from the Resurrection.\n\n\n\n
  162. These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians, but they can and have been interpreted in various ways to avoid the conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead. Several naturalistic theories regarding the tomb and the appearances have been proposed, but all of these fail to explain the historical data. Furthermore, there is a quantity of circumstantial evidence that supplements this data and makes the case for the Resurrection even stronger.\n\n
  163. These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians, but they can and have been interpreted in various ways to avoid the conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead. Several naturalistic theories regarding the tomb and the appearances have been proposed, but all of these fail to explain the historical data. Furthermore, there is a quantity of circumstantial evidence that supplements this data and makes the case for the Resurrection even stronger.\n\n
  164. These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians, but they can and have been interpreted in various ways to avoid the conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead. Several naturalistic theories regarding the tomb and the appearances have been proposed, but all of these fail to explain the historical data. Furthermore, there is a quantity of circumstantial evidence that supplements this data and makes the case for the Resurrection even stronger.\n\n
  165. These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians, but they can and have been interpreted in various ways to avoid the conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead. Several naturalistic theories regarding the tomb and the appearances have been proposed, but all of these fail to explain the historical data. Furthermore, there is a quantity of circumstantial evidence that supplements this data and makes the case for the Resurrection even stronger.\n\n
  166. These facts cannot be ignored by historians and theologians, but they can and have been interpreted in various ways to avoid the conclusion that Jesus rose from the dead. Several naturalistic theories regarding the tomb and the appearances have been proposed, but all of these fail to explain the historical data. Furthermore, there is a quantity of circumstantial evidence that supplements this data and makes the case for the Resurrection even stronger.\n\n
  167. The tomb of Jesus was either occupied or empty on the first day of the week. We will first consider four theories that claim that the tomb was still occupied. Then we will examine four naturalistic theories that attempt to explain why the tomb was empty.\nThe first option is that the tomb was still occupied:\n\n\n
  168. The tomb of Jesus was either occupied or empty on the first day of the week. We will first consider four theories that claim that the tomb was still occupied. Then we will examine four naturalistic theories that attempt to explain why the tomb was empty.\nThe first option is that the tomb was still occupied:\n\n\n
  169. The tomb of Jesus was either occupied or empty on the first day of the week. We will first consider four theories that claim that the tomb was still occupied. Then we will examine four naturalistic theories that attempt to explain why the tomb was empty.\nThe first option is that the tomb was still occupied:\n\n\n
  170. (1) The location of the tomb was unknown. This theory is completely unacceptable because all four Gospels state that Joseph of Arimathea obtained permission from Pilate to bury the body of Jesus in his newly hewn tomb near the crucifixion site. Certainly he knew the location of his own private garden tomb. The accounts also make it clear that the women and disciples had no trouble finding the tomb, and the guard certainly knew the location as well. A variation of this theory holds that Jesus' body was thrown into a common pit for the executed. This view can only be maintained by an outright denial of all four burial accounts, and there is not a shred of evidence for doing so.\n\n
  171. (1) The location of the tomb was unknown. This theory is completely unacceptable because all four Gospels state that Joseph of Arimathea obtained permission from Pilate to bury the body of Jesus in his newly hewn tomb near the crucifixion site. Certainly he knew the location of his own private garden tomb. The accounts also make it clear that the women and disciples had no trouble finding the tomb, and the guard certainly knew the location as well. A variation of this theory holds that Jesus' body was thrown into a common pit for the executed. This view can only be maintained by an outright denial of all four burial accounts, and there is not a shred of evidence for doing so.\n\n
  172. (1) The location of the tomb was unknown. This theory is completely unacceptable because all four Gospels state that Joseph of Arimathea obtained permission from Pilate to bury the body of Jesus in his newly hewn tomb near the crucifixion site. Certainly he knew the location of his own private garden tomb. The accounts also make it clear that the women and disciples had no trouble finding the tomb, and the guard certainly knew the location as well. A variation of this theory holds that Jesus' body was thrown into a common pit for the executed. This view can only be maintained by an outright denial of all four burial accounts, and there is not a shred of evidence for doing so.\n\n
  173. (2) The women and disciples went to the wrong tomb. This theory eliminates the "He has risen" of Mark 16:6, arguing that the young man's statement to the women was simply, "He is not here; behold, here is the place where they laid Him." He was telling them that they had the wrong tomb, but the women misunderstood. There is no textual basis for changing this verse, and to be true, this theory would have to distort many other verses as well. It also requires the absurd conclusion that Peter and John, eventually Joseph of Arimathea, the guards, and the Jewish and Roman authorities all went to the wrong tomb, and that the correct tomb was never found.\n\n
  174. (2) The women and disciples went to the wrong tomb. This theory eliminates the "He has risen" of Mark 16:6, arguing that the young man's statement to the women was simply, "He is not here; behold, here is the place where they laid Him." He was telling them that they had the wrong tomb, but the women misunderstood. There is no textual basis for changing this verse, and to be true, this theory would have to distort many other verses as well. It also requires the absurd conclusion that Peter and John, eventually Joseph of Arimathea, the guards, and the Jewish and Roman authorities all went to the wrong tomb, and that the correct tomb was never found.\n\n
  175. (2) The women and disciples went to the wrong tomb. This theory eliminates the "He has risen" of Mark 16:6, arguing that the young man's statement to the women was simply, "He is not here; behold, here is the place where they laid Him." He was telling them that they had the wrong tomb, but the women misunderstood. There is no textual basis for changing this verse, and to be true, this theory would have to distort many other verses as well. It also requires the absurd conclusion that Peter and John, eventually Joseph of Arimathea, the guards, and the Jewish and Roman authorities all went to the wrong tomb, and that the correct tomb was never found.\n\n
  176. (2) The women and disciples went to the wrong tomb. This theory eliminates the "He has risen" of Mark 16:6, arguing that the young man's statement to the women was simply, "He is not here; behold, here is the place where they laid Him." He was telling them that they had the wrong tomb, but the women misunderstood. There is no textual basis for changing this verse, and to be true, this theory would have to distort many other verses as well. It also requires the absurd conclusion that Peter and John, eventually Joseph of Arimathea, the guards, and the Jewish and Roman authorities all went to the wrong tomb, and that the correct tomb was never found.\n\n
  177. (3) Jesus was resurrected spiritually, not bodily. This "pious" compromise rejects the physical resurrection of Jesus but holds that He is alive. His appearances to the disciples were genuine, but they misinterpreted the nature of His resurrection. Like the other theories, this one does a severe injustice to the historical accounts. In the postres-urrection narratives, Jesus placed special emphasis on the fact that His body was resurrected: "See My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself; touch Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have" (Luke 24:39). The disciples took hold of His feet (Matt. 28:9), Mary clung to Him (John 20:17), and He ate a piece of broiled fish before the disciples (Luke 24:42-43). Jesus stressed His physical resurrection because a mere spiritual resurrection (with His body rotting in the tomb) would have been unacceptable to the Jews; first-century Judaism correctly awaited the restoration of the whole person, including the body.\n\n\n
  178. (3) Jesus was resurrected spiritually, not bodily. This "pious" compromise rejects the physical resurrection of Jesus but holds that He is alive. His appearances to the disciples were genuine, but they misinterpreted the nature of His resurrection. Like the other theories, this one does a severe injustice to the historical accounts. In the postres-urrection narratives, Jesus placed special emphasis on the fact that His body was resurrected: "See My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself; touch Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have" (Luke 24:39). The disciples took hold of His feet (Matt. 28:9), Mary clung to Him (John 20:17), and He ate a piece of broiled fish before the disciples (Luke 24:42-43). Jesus stressed His physical resurrection because a mere spiritual resurrection (with His body rotting in the tomb) would have been unacceptable to the Jews; first-century Judaism correctly awaited the restoration of the whole person, including the body.\n\n\n
  179. (3) Jesus was resurrected spiritually, not bodily. This "pious" compromise rejects the physical resurrection of Jesus but holds that He is alive. His appearances to the disciples were genuine, but they misinterpreted the nature of His resurrection. Like the other theories, this one does a severe injustice to the historical accounts. In the postres-urrection narratives, Jesus placed special emphasis on the fact that His body was resurrected: "See My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself; touch Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have" (Luke 24:39). The disciples took hold of His feet (Matt. 28:9), Mary clung to Him (John 20:17), and He ate a piece of broiled fish before the disciples (Luke 24:42-43). Jesus stressed His physical resurrection because a mere spiritual resurrection (with His body rotting in the tomb) would have been unacceptable to the Jews; first-century Judaism correctly awaited the restoration of the whole person, including the body.\n\n\n
  180. (3) Jesus was resurrected spiritually, not bodily. This "pious" compromise rejects the physical resurrection of Jesus but holds that He is alive. His appearances to the disciples were genuine, but they misinterpreted the nature of His resurrection. Like the other theories, this one does a severe injustice to the historical accounts. In the postres-urrection narratives, Jesus placed special emphasis on the fact that His body was resurrected: "See My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself; touch Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have" (Luke 24:39). The disciples took hold of His feet (Matt. 28:9), Mary clung to Him (John 20:17), and He ate a piece of broiled fish before the disciples (Luke 24:42-43). Jesus stressed His physical resurrection because a mere spiritual resurrection (with His body rotting in the tomb) would have been unacceptable to the Jews; first-century Judaism correctly awaited the restoration of the whole person, including the body.\n\n\n
  181. (3) Jesus was resurrected spiritually, not bodily. This "pious" compromise rejects the physical resurrection of Jesus but holds that He is alive. His appearances to the disciples were genuine, but they misinterpreted the nature of His resurrection. Like the other theories, this one does a severe injustice to the historical accounts. In the postres-urrection narratives, Jesus placed special emphasis on the fact that His body was resurrected: "See My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself; touch Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have" (Luke 24:39). The disciples took hold of His feet (Matt. 28:9), Mary clung to Him (John 20:17), and He ate a piece of broiled fish before the disciples (Luke 24:42-43). Jesus stressed His physical resurrection because a mere spiritual resurrection (with His body rotting in the tomb) would have been unacceptable to the Jews; first-century Judaism correctly awaited the restoration of the whole person, including the body.\n\n\n
  182. (4) A twin brother or someone who looked like Jesus was crucified and buried in His place. This desperate theory does not have a bit of evidence to support it and contradicts many clear passages. For example, Jesus bore the marks of His crucifixion and spear wound on His resurrection body (see John 20:24-28) and physically ascended into heaven in the sight of the disciples (Acts 1:9).\n\n
  183. (4) A twin brother or someone who looked like Jesus was crucified and buried in His place. This desperate theory does not have a bit of evidence to support it and contradicts many clear passages. For example, Jesus bore the marks of His crucifixion and spear wound on His resurrection body (see John 20:24-28) and physically ascended into heaven in the sight of the disciples (Acts 1:9).\n\n
  184. (4) A twin brother or someone who looked like Jesus was crucified and buried in His place. This desperate theory does not have a bit of evidence to support it and contradicts many clear passages. For example, Jesus bore the marks of His crucifixion and spear wound on His resurrection body (see John 20:24-28) and physically ascended into heaven in the sight of the disciples (Acts 1:9).\n\n
  185. (4) A twin brother or someone who looked like Jesus was crucified and buried in His place. This desperate theory does not have a bit of evidence to support it and contradicts many clear passages. For example, Jesus bore the marks of His crucifixion and spear wound on His resurrection body (see John 20:24-28) and physically ascended into heaven in the sight of the disciples (Acts 1:9).\n\n
  186. The remaining option is that the tomb was empty: (1) One or more of Jesus' friends stole His body. This was the original explanation for the empty tomb (see Matt. 28:11-15); the soldiers were bribed by the chief priests and elders to lie and say that the disciples stole the body while they were asleep. Of course, if they were sleeping, how could they know that the disciples were responsible? This would also require the entire guard to be asleep at the same time, a circumstance made even more unlikely by the fact that their lives were on the line if the body was stolen. Furthermore, the noise involved in rolling the huge stone away from the entire sepulcher would surely have aroused some of the soldiers from their slumber. In addition to these problems, neither Joseph of Arimathea nor the disciples would have had any real motive to steal the body. They did not expect the Resurrection to take place and had nothing to gain and everything to lose by perpetrating a deliberate fraud. The disciples endured great suffering because of their testimony about the resurrected Lord, most to the point of death. Such behavior would have been absurd if they knew it was all a lie. This kind of deception is also inconsistent with the high moral character exhibited in their New Testament epistles. Finally, how would this frightened band of men be able to overcome an armed guard of professional soldiers?\n
  187. The remaining option is that the tomb was empty: (1) One or more of Jesus' friends stole His body. This was the original explanation for the empty tomb (see Matt. 28:11-15); the soldiers were bribed by the chief priests and elders to lie and say that the disciples stole the body while they were asleep. Of course, if they were sleeping, how could they know that the disciples were responsible? This would also require the entire guard to be asleep at the same time, a circumstance made even more unlikely by the fact that their lives were on the line if the body was stolen. Furthermore, the noise involved in rolling the huge stone away from the entire sepulcher would surely have aroused some of the soldiers from their slumber. In addition to these problems, neither Joseph of Arimathea nor the disciples would have had any real motive to steal the body. They did not expect the Resurrection to take place and had nothing to gain and everything to lose by perpetrating a deliberate fraud. The disciples endured great suffering because of their testimony about the resurrected Lord, most to the point of death. Such behavior would have been absurd if they knew it was all a lie. This kind of deception is also inconsistent with the high moral character exhibited in their New Testament epistles. Finally, how would this frightened band of men be able to overcome an armed guard of professional soldiers?\n
  188. The remaining option is that the tomb was empty: (1) One or more of Jesus' friends stole His body. This was the original explanation for the empty tomb (see Matt. 28:11-15); the soldiers were bribed by the chief priests and elders to lie and say that the disciples stole the body while they were asleep. Of course, if they were sleeping, how could they know that the disciples were responsible? This would also require the entire guard to be asleep at the same time, a circumstance made even more unlikely by the fact that their lives were on the line if the body was stolen. Furthermore, the noise involved in rolling the huge stone away from the entire sepulcher would surely have aroused some of the soldiers from their slumber. In addition to these problems, neither Joseph of Arimathea nor the disciples would have had any real motive to steal the body. They did not expect the Resurrection to take place and had nothing to gain and everything to lose by perpetrating a deliberate fraud. The disciples endured great suffering because of their testimony about the resurrected Lord, most to the point of death. Such behavior would have been absurd if they knew it was all a lie. This kind of deception is also inconsistent with the high moral character exhibited in their New Testament epistles. Finally, how would this frightened band of men be able to overcome an armed guard of professional soldiers?\n
  189. The remaining option is that the tomb was empty: (1) One or more of Jesus' friends stole His body. This was the original explanation for the empty tomb (see Matt. 28:11-15); the soldiers were bribed by the chief priests and elders to lie and say that the disciples stole the body while they were asleep. Of course, if they were sleeping, how could they know that the disciples were responsible? This would also require the entire guard to be asleep at the same time, a circumstance made even more unlikely by the fact that their lives were on the line if the body was stolen. Furthermore, the noise involved in rolling the huge stone away from the entire sepulcher would surely have aroused some of the soldiers from their slumber. In addition to these problems, neither Joseph of Arimathea nor the disciples would have had any real motive to steal the body. They did not expect the Resurrection to take place and had nothing to gain and everything to lose by perpetrating a deliberate fraud. The disciples endured great suffering because of their testimony about the resurrected Lord, most to the point of death. Such behavior would have been absurd if they knew it was all a lie. This kind of deception is also inconsistent with the high moral character exhibited in their New Testament epistles. Finally, how would this frightened band of men be able to overcome an armed guard of professional soldiers?\n
  190. The remaining option is that the tomb was empty: (1) One or more of Jesus' friends stole His body. This was the original explanation for the empty tomb (see Matt. 28:11-15); the soldiers were bribed by the chief priests and elders to lie and say that the disciples stole the body while they were asleep. Of course, if they were sleeping, how could they know that the disciples were responsible? This would also require the entire guard to be asleep at the same time, a circumstance made even more unlikely by the fact that their lives were on the line if the body was stolen. Furthermore, the noise involved in rolling the huge stone away from the entire sepulcher would surely have aroused some of the soldiers from their slumber. In addition to these problems, neither Joseph of Arimathea nor the disciples would have had any real motive to steal the body. They did not expect the Resurrection to take place and had nothing to gain and everything to lose by perpetrating a deliberate fraud. The disciples endured great suffering because of their testimony about the resurrected Lord, most to the point of death. Such behavior would have been absurd if they knew it was all a lie. This kind of deception is also inconsistent with the high moral character exhibited in their New Testament epistles. Finally, how would this frightened band of men be able to overcome an armed guard of professional soldiers?\n
  191. (2) The enemies of Jesus stole the body. This theory is also plagued by the problem of motive; why would the Jewish or Roman authorities want to steal the body when this is precisely the thing they sought to avoid? Even if they did remove the body for security purposes, they would have made such a claim and displayed the body, if necessary, to put an end to the rumors of the Resurrection that were circulating in Jerusalem. The complete silence on the part of the Jewish and Roman authorities loudly proclaimed their acknowledgment that the body was inexplicably gone.\n\n
  192. (2) The enemies of Jesus stole the body. This theory is also plagued by the problem of motive; why would the Jewish or Roman authorities want to steal the body when this is precisely the thing they sought to avoid? Even if they did remove the body for security purposes, they would have made such a claim and displayed the body, if necessary, to put an end to the rumors of the Resurrection that were circulating in Jerusalem. The complete silence on the part of the Jewish and Roman authorities loudly proclaimed their acknowledgment that the body was inexplicably gone.\n\n
  193. (2) The enemies of Jesus stole the body. This theory is also plagued by the problem of motive; why would the Jewish or Roman authorities want to steal the body when this is precisely the thing they sought to avoid? Even if they did remove the body for security purposes, they would have made such a claim and displayed the body, if necessary, to put an end to the rumors of the Resurrection that were circulating in Jerusalem. The complete silence on the part of the Jewish and Roman authorities loudly proclaimed their acknowledgment that the body was inexplicably gone.\n\n
  194. (2) The enemies of Jesus stole the body. This theory is also plagued by the problem of motive; why would the Jewish or Roman authorities want to steal the body when this is precisely the thing they sought to avoid? Even if they did remove the body for security purposes, they would have made such a claim and displayed the body, if necessary, to put an end to the rumors of the Resurrection that were circulating in Jerusalem. The complete silence on the part of the Jewish and Roman authorities loudly proclaimed their acknowledgment that the body was inexplicably gone.\n\n
  195. (3) Jesus "swooned" on the cross and appeared to be dead. He was resuscitated by the cool air of the tomb, and His disciples were convinced He rose from the dead. This eighteenth-century rationalistic theory, when analyzed, requires as great a miracle as the Resurrection itself. It means that Jesus endured the beatings at His trials, the crown of thorns, the terrible scourging, the crucifixion, and even the spear thrust in His side and somehow survived. The professional executioners were satisfied that He was dead and His body was wrapped in linen along with 100 pounds of spices. In spite of great loss of blood and many hours in the cold tomb without food, water, or assistance, He revived. Then He managed to escape from the grave-clothes and spices and replace them neatly in the tomb; He rolled the huge stone up an incline away from the opening, overcame the armed guards, walked miles on pierced feet, and convinced His disciples that He had conquered death as the resurrected Author of life. This ludicrous theory would also have us believe that Jesus lived on after all this and died a natural death in obscurity.\n\n
  196. (3) Jesus "swooned" on the cross and appeared to be dead. He was resuscitated by the cool air of the tomb, and His disciples were convinced He rose from the dead. This eighteenth-century rationalistic theory, when analyzed, requires as great a miracle as the Resurrection itself. It means that Jesus endured the beatings at His trials, the crown of thorns, the terrible scourging, the crucifixion, and even the spear thrust in His side and somehow survived. The professional executioners were satisfied that He was dead and His body was wrapped in linen along with 100 pounds of spices. In spite of great loss of blood and many hours in the cold tomb without food, water, or assistance, He revived. Then He managed to escape from the grave-clothes and spices and replace them neatly in the tomb; He rolled the huge stone up an incline away from the opening, overcame the armed guards, walked miles on pierced feet, and convinced His disciples that He had conquered death as the resurrected Author of life. This ludicrous theory would also have us believe that Jesus lived on after all this and died a natural death in obscurity.\n\n
  197. (3) Jesus "swooned" on the cross and appeared to be dead. He was resuscitated by the cool air of the tomb, and His disciples were convinced He rose from the dead. This eighteenth-century rationalistic theory, when analyzed, requires as great a miracle as the Resurrection itself. It means that Jesus endured the beatings at His trials, the crown of thorns, the terrible scourging, the crucifixion, and even the spear thrust in His side and somehow survived. The professional executioners were satisfied that He was dead and His body was wrapped in linen along with 100 pounds of spices. In spite of great loss of blood and many hours in the cold tomb without food, water, or assistance, He revived. Then He managed to escape from the grave-clothes and spices and replace them neatly in the tomb; He rolled the huge stone up an incline away from the opening, overcame the armed guards, walked miles on pierced feet, and convinced His disciples that He had conquered death as the resurrected Author of life. This ludicrous theory would also have us believe that Jesus lived on after all this and died a natural death in obscurity.\n\n
  198. (4) Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament messianic passages. He plotted with Joseph of Arimathea to receive a drug during His crucifixion that would make Him appear to be dead. Joseph was then to place Jesus in his tomb and revive Him so that the disciples would believe He had been resurrected. But the Roman spear changed these plans and Jesus lived only briefly after being revived. Joseph removed the body, and when a certain "young man" appeared a few times to the confused disciples, they thought he was Jesus. This fanciful scenario appears in The Passover Plot, the brainchild of Hugh Schoenfield. It requires at least as great a distortion of the historical accounts as the previous theories. Schoenfield simply rejects the many passages that disprove his theory and builds on a few verses taken completely out of context. This antiresurrection theory is totally bereft of evidence, and it makes Jesus a malicious deceiver and the disciples a band of gullible fools.\n\n\n
  199. (4) Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament messianic passages. He plotted with Joseph of Arimathea to receive a drug during His crucifixion that would make Him appear to be dead. Joseph was then to place Jesus in his tomb and revive Him so that the disciples would believe He had been resurrected. But the Roman spear changed these plans and Jesus lived only briefly after being revived. Joseph removed the body, and when a certain "young man" appeared a few times to the confused disciples, they thought he was Jesus. This fanciful scenario appears in The Passover Plot, the brainchild of Hugh Schoenfield. It requires at least as great a distortion of the historical accounts as the previous theories. Schoenfield simply rejects the many passages that disprove his theory and builds on a few verses taken completely out of context. This antiresurrection theory is totally bereft of evidence, and it makes Jesus a malicious deceiver and the disciples a band of gullible fools.\n\n\n
  200. (4) Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament messianic passages. He plotted with Joseph of Arimathea to receive a drug during His crucifixion that would make Him appear to be dead. Joseph was then to place Jesus in his tomb and revive Him so that the disciples would believe He had been resurrected. But the Roman spear changed these plans and Jesus lived only briefly after being revived. Joseph removed the body, and when a certain "young man" appeared a few times to the confused disciples, they thought he was Jesus. This fanciful scenario appears in The Passover Plot, the brainchild of Hugh Schoenfield. It requires at least as great a distortion of the historical accounts as the previous theories. Schoenfield simply rejects the many passages that disprove his theory and builds on a few verses taken completely out of context. This antiresurrection theory is totally bereft of evidence, and it makes Jesus a malicious deceiver and the disciples a band of gullible fools.\n\n\n
  201. (4) Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament messianic passages. He plotted with Joseph of Arimathea to receive a drug during His crucifixion that would make Him appear to be dead. Joseph was then to place Jesus in his tomb and revive Him so that the disciples would believe He had been resurrected. But the Roman spear changed these plans and Jesus lived only briefly after being revived. Joseph removed the body, and when a certain "young man" appeared a few times to the confused disciples, they thought he was Jesus. This fanciful scenario appears in The Passover Plot, the brainchild of Hugh Schoenfield. It requires at least as great a distortion of the historical accounts as the previous theories. Schoenfield simply rejects the many passages that disprove his theory and builds on a few verses taken completely out of context. This antiresurrection theory is totally bereft of evidence, and it makes Jesus a malicious deceiver and the disciples a band of gullible fools.\n\n\n
  202. (4) Jesus wanted to deceive His disciples into thinking He was the Messiah by engineering His fulfillment of the Old Testament messianic passages. He plotted with Joseph of Arimathea to receive a drug during His crucifixion that would make Him appear to be dead. Joseph was then to place Jesus in his tomb and revive Him so that the disciples would believe He had been resurrected. But the Roman spear changed these plans and Jesus lived only briefly after being revived. Joseph removed the body, and when a certain "young man" appeared a few times to the confused disciples, they thought he was Jesus. This fanciful scenario appears in The Passover Plot, the brainchild of Hugh Schoenfield. It requires at least as great a distortion of the historical accounts as the previous theories. Schoenfield simply rejects the many passages that disprove his theory and builds on a few verses taken completely out of context. This antiresurrection theory is totally bereft of evidence, and it makes Jesus a malicious deceiver and the disciples a band of gullible fools.\n\n\n
  203. None of these theories even comes close to accounting for the historical facts associated with the empty tomb, the appearances of the resurrected Christ, and the radical changes in the lives of the disciples. They distort the clear evidence without any basis and require more faith to believe than the Resurrection itself. It is ironic that the chief priests and the Pharisees made such an effort to have the tomb secured, because had they not done so, the case for the Resurrection would not have been as strong.\n\n
  204. None of these theories even comes close to accounting for the historical facts associated with the empty tomb, the appearances of the resurrected Christ, and the radical changes in the lives of the disciples. They distort the clear evidence without any basis and require more faith to believe than the Resurrection itself. It is ironic that the chief priests and the Pharisees made such an effort to have the tomb secured, because had they not done so, the case for the Resurrection would not have been as strong.\n\n
  205. None of these theories even comes close to accounting for the historical facts associated with the empty tomb, the appearances of the resurrected Christ, and the radical changes in the lives of the disciples. They distort the clear evidence without any basis and require more faith to believe than the Resurrection itself. It is ironic that the chief priests and the Pharisees made such an effort to have the tomb secured, because had they not done so, the case for the Resurrection would not have been as strong.\n\n
  206. None of these theories even comes close to accounting for the historical facts associated with the empty tomb, the appearances of the resurrected Christ, and the radical changes in the lives of the disciples. They distort the clear evidence without any basis and require more faith to believe than the Resurrection itself. It is ironic that the chief priests and the Pharisees made such an effort to have the tomb secured, because had they not done so, the case for the Resurrection would not have been as strong.\n\n
  207. None of these theories even comes close to accounting for the historical facts associated with the empty tomb, the appearances of the resurrected Christ, and the radical changes in the lives of the disciples. They distort the clear evidence without any basis and require more faith to believe than the Resurrection itself. It is ironic that the chief priests and the Pharisees made such an effort to have the tomb secured, because had they not done so, the case for the Resurrection would not have been as strong.\n\n
  208. (1) The disciples all lied about seeing the resurrected Jesus. The first problem with this view is that it contradicts the historical accounts. It also means that all of the disciples who claimed to have seen the Lord (including the 500 people mentioned by Paul) were liars. To make matters worse, these people had nothing to gain by perpetuating such a falsehood, and many of them suffered for this testimony, even to the point of violent deaths. Would this many people willingly give up their lives for the sake of a fraud?\n\n\n
  209. (1) The disciples all lied about seeing the resurrected Jesus. The first problem with this view is that it contradicts the historical accounts. It also means that all of the disciples who claimed to have seen the Lord (including the 500 people mentioned by Paul) were liars. To make matters worse, these people had nothing to gain by perpetuating such a falsehood, and many of them suffered for this testimony, even to the point of violent deaths. Would this many people willingly give up their lives for the sake of a fraud?\n\n\n
  210. (1) The disciples all lied about seeing the resurrected Jesus. The first problem with this view is that it contradicts the historical accounts. It also means that all of the disciples who claimed to have seen the Lord (including the 500 people mentioned by Paul) were liars. To make matters worse, these people had nothing to gain by perpetuating such a falsehood, and many of them suffered for this testimony, even to the point of violent deaths. Would this many people willingly give up their lives for the sake of a fraud?\n\n\n
  211. (1) The disciples all lied about seeing the resurrected Jesus. The first problem with this view is that it contradicts the historical accounts. It also means that all of the disciples who claimed to have seen the Lord (including the 500 people mentioned by Paul) were liars. To make matters worse, these people had nothing to gain by perpetuating such a falsehood, and many of them suffered for this testimony, even to the point of violent deaths. Would this many people willingly give up their lives for the sake of a fraud?\n\n\n
  212. (2) The postresurrection appearances of Christ were merely hallucinations in the minds of the disciples. There are a number of reasons why the hallucination theory does not fit the facts: (a) Hallucinations are private, not publicly shared experiences. But according to the accounts, Jesus appeared several times to groups of people including a crowd of 500. (b) Hallucinations are generally restructed to favorable places and times of day, but Christ appeared in a variety of locations and times. There was no pattern in His appearances, (c) Only certain kinds of people (e.g., people with schizoid tendencies, ascetics, those who use hallucinogenic drugs) are subject to hallucinatory experiences, but the appearances of Christ involved a great range of personalities, (d) After Christ appeared to people over a 40-day period, His appearances suddenly ceased. Hallucinations, on the other hand, generally recur over a long period of time and do not abruptly stop, (e) Hallucinations are stimulated by expectation, but the disciples had no hope at all of Christ's resurrection. They were quite skeptical about the earliest reports, (f) The disciples touched, talked, and ate with the Lord at various times, and this certainly cannot be said to be characteristic of hallucinations.\n\n
  213. (2) The postresurrection appearances of Christ were merely hallucinations in the minds of the disciples. There are a number of reasons why the hallucination theory does not fit the facts: (a) Hallucinations are private, not publicly shared experiences. But according to the accounts, Jesus appeared several times to groups of people including a crowd of 500. (b) Hallucinations are generally restructed to favorable places and times of day, but Christ appeared in a variety of locations and times. There was no pattern in His appearances, (c) Only certain kinds of people (e.g., people with schizoid tendencies, ascetics, those who use hallucinogenic drugs) are subject to hallucinatory experiences, but the appearances of Christ involved a great range of personalities, (d) After Christ appeared to people over a 40-day period, His appearances suddenly ceased. Hallucinations, on the other hand, generally recur over a long period of time and do not abruptly stop, (e) Hallucinations are stimulated by expectation, but the disciples had no hope at all of Christ's resurrection. They were quite skeptical about the earliest reports, (f) The disciples touched, talked, and ate with the Lord at various times, and this certainly cannot be said to be characteristic of hallucinations.\n\n
  214. (2) The postresurrection appearances of Christ were merely hallucinations in the minds of the disciples. There are a number of reasons why the hallucination theory does not fit the facts: (a) Hallucinations are private, not publicly shared experiences. But according to the accounts, Jesus appeared several times to groups of people including a crowd of 500. (b) Hallucinations are generally restructed to favorable places and times of day, but Christ appeared in a variety of locations and times. There was no pattern in His appearances, (c) Only certain kinds of people (e.g., people with schizoid tendencies, ascetics, those who use hallucinogenic drugs) are subject to hallucinatory experiences, but the appearances of Christ involved a great range of personalities, (d) After Christ appeared to people over a 40-day period, His appearances suddenly ceased. Hallucinations, on the other hand, generally recur over a long period of time and do not abruptly stop, (e) Hallucinations are stimulated by expectation, but the disciples had no hope at all of Christ's resurrection. They were quite skeptical about the earliest reports, (f) The disciples touched, talked, and ate with the Lord at various times, and this certainly cannot be said to be characteristic of hallucinations.\n\n
  215. (2) The postresurrection appearances of Christ were merely hallucinations in the minds of the disciples. There are a number of reasons why the hallucination theory does not fit the facts: (a) Hallucinations are private, not publicly shared experiences. But according to the accounts, Jesus appeared several times to groups of people including a crowd of 500. (b) Hallucinations are generally restructed to favorable places and times of day, but Christ appeared in a variety of locations and times. There was no pattern in His appearances, (c) Only certain kinds of people (e.g., people with schizoid tendencies, ascetics, those who use hallucinogenic drugs) are subject to hallucinatory experiences, but the appearances of Christ involved a great range of personalities, (d) After Christ appeared to people over a 40-day period, His appearances suddenly ceased. Hallucinations, on the other hand, generally recur over a long period of time and do not abruptly stop, (e) Hallucinations are stimulated by expectation, but the disciples had no hope at all of Christ's resurrection. They were quite skeptical about the earliest reports, (f) The disciples touched, talked, and ate with the Lord at various times, and this certainly cannot be said to be characteristic of hallucinations.\n\n
  216. (3) The whole story of the resurrected Jesus, including the appearances, is simply an elaborate legend created by the early church. To answer this objection, it may be necessary to look at the question concerning the reliability of the Bible (see chap. 6). These accounts were backed up by eyewitness testimonies and widely circulated without being challenged by the friends or enemies of Jesus. Peter firmly declared, "We did not follow cleverly devised tales when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of His majesty" (2 Peter 1:16). The dating of the New Testament documents also precludes the development of such a legend because there was not enough time. With every passing year, additional archeological discoveries continue to vindicate the historical reliability of the Scriptures.\n\n\n
  217. (3) The whole story of the resurrected Jesus, including the appearances, is simply an elaborate legend created by the early church. To answer this objection, it may be necessary to look at the question concerning the reliability of the Bible (see chap. 6). These accounts were backed up by eyewitness testimonies and widely circulated without being challenged by the friends or enemies of Jesus. Peter firmly declared, "We did not follow cleverly devised tales when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of His majesty" (2 Peter 1:16). The dating of the New Testament documents also precludes the development of such a legend because there was not enough time. With every passing year, additional archeological discoveries continue to vindicate the historical reliability of the Scriptures.\n\n\n
  218. (3) The whole story of the resurrected Jesus, including the appearances, is simply an elaborate legend created by the early church. To answer this objection, it may be necessary to look at the question concerning the reliability of the Bible (see chap. 6). These accounts were backed up by eyewitness testimonies and widely circulated without being challenged by the friends or enemies of Jesus. Peter firmly declared, "We did not follow cleverly devised tales when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of His majesty" (2 Peter 1:16). The dating of the New Testament documents also precludes the development of such a legend because there was not enough time. With every passing year, additional archeological discoveries continue to vindicate the historical reliability of the Scriptures.\n\n\n
  219. (3) The whole story of the resurrected Jesus, including the appearances, is simply an elaborate legend created by the early church. To answer this objection, it may be necessary to look at the question concerning the reliability of the Bible (see chap. 6). These accounts were backed up by eyewitness testimonies and widely circulated without being challenged by the friends or enemies of Jesus. Peter firmly declared, "We did not follow cleverly devised tales when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of His majesty" (2 Peter 1:16). The dating of the New Testament documents also precludes the development of such a legend because there was not enough time. With every passing year, additional archeological discoveries continue to vindicate the historical reliability of the Scriptures.\n\n\n
  220. (1) Christ predicted His own resurrection on the third day and announced that this would be the most significant sign for the affirmation of His truth claims. The Lord demonstrated His foreknowledge of this crucial event several times (e.g., Matt. 12:38-40; Mark 8:31; 9:31; 10:33-34; John 2:18-22).\n\n
  221. (1) Christ predicted His own resurrection on the third day and announced that this would be the most significant sign for the affirmation of His truth claims. The Lord demonstrated His foreknowledge of this crucial event several times (e.g., Matt. 12:38-40; Mark 8:31; 9:31; 10:33-34; John 2:18-22).\n\n
  222. (1) Christ predicted His own resurrection on the third day and announced that this would be the most significant sign for the affirmation of His truth claims. The Lord demonstrated His foreknowledge of this crucial event several times (e.g., Matt. 12:38-40; Mark 8:31; 9:31; 10:33-34; John 2:18-22).\n\n
  223. (2) The silence of the Jewish leaders about the Resurrection eloquently testified that they knew these things were undeniable. They certainly would have offered a refutation of this Christian claim if there had been any basis for doing so.\n\n
  224. (2) The silence of the Jewish leaders about the Resurrection eloquently testified that they knew these things were undeniable. They certainly would have offered a refutation of this Christian claim if there had been any basis for doing so.\n\n
  225. (3) Before the Resurrection, the disciples were fearful men whose faith was weak and all abandoned Jesus after His arrest. But by the Day of Pentecost seven weeks later, they were boldly proclaiming Christ to the multitudes in Jerusalem. This transformation was complete, permanent, and unanimous. All of them suffered for the sake of the message of the resurrected Lord, and almost all died as martyrs. It is clear that they were totally convinced of the truth of the Resurrection, and they were certainly in a position to know whether the Resurrection had indeed taken place.\n\n
  226. (3) Before the Resurrection, the disciples were fearful men whose faith was weak and all abandoned Jesus after His arrest. But by the Day of Pentecost seven weeks later, they were boldly proclaiming Christ to the multitudes in Jerusalem. This transformation was complete, permanent, and unanimous. All of them suffered for the sake of the message of the resurrected Lord, and almost all died as martyrs. It is clear that they were totally convinced of the truth of the Resurrection, and they were certainly in a position to know whether the Resurrection had indeed taken place.\n\n
  227. (3) Before the Resurrection, the disciples were fearful men whose faith was weak and all abandoned Jesus after His arrest. But by the Day of Pentecost seven weeks later, they were boldly proclaiming Christ to the multitudes in Jerusalem. This transformation was complete, permanent, and unanimous. All of them suffered for the sake of the message of the resurrected Lord, and almost all died as martyrs. It is clear that they were totally convinced of the truth of the Resurrection, and they were certainly in a position to know whether the Resurrection had indeed taken place.\n\n
  228. (3) Before the Resurrection, the disciples were fearful men whose faith was weak and all abandoned Jesus after His arrest. But by the Day of Pentecost seven weeks later, they were boldly proclaiming Christ to the multitudes in Jerusalem. This transformation was complete, permanent, and unanimous. All of them suffered for the sake of the message of the resurrected Lord, and almost all died as martyrs. It is clear that they were totally convinced of the truth of the Resurrection, and they were certainly in a position to know whether the Resurrection had indeed taken place.\n\n
  229. (4) The success of the early Christian church in spite of fierce opposition is another evidence for the Resurrection. The church began right in Jerusalem, the city of the empty tomb, and the apostles' preaching centered on the resurrected Savior. Without the Resurrection, the church would not have come into existence.\n\n
  230. (4) The success of the early Christian church in spite of fierce opposition is another evidence for the Resurrection. The church began right in Jerusalem, the city of the empty tomb, and the apostles' preaching centered on the resurrected Savior. Without the Resurrection, the church would not have come into existence.\n\n
  231. (4) The success of the early Christian church in spite of fierce opposition is another evidence for the Resurrection. The church began right in Jerusalem, the city of the empty tomb, and the apostles' preaching centered on the resurrected Savior. Without the Resurrection, the church would not have come into existence.\n\n
  232. (5) The shift from Saturday to Sunday as the day of worship for the early Jewish Christians (cf. Acts 20:7; 1 Cor. 16:1-2) was a radical act that would never have taken place if Christ had not been raised on the first day of the week (Matt. 28:1; Luke 24:1).\n\n\n
  233. (5) The shift from Saturday to Sunday as the day of worship for the early Jewish Christians (cf. Acts 20:7; 1 Cor. 16:1-2) was a radical act that would never have taken place if Christ had not been raised on the first day of the week (Matt. 28:1; Luke 24:1).\n\n\n
  234. (6) The sacraments of baptism and Communion are both related to the Resurrection, and would have been senseless in the early church apart from the historical reality of the Resurrection.\n\n
  235. (6) The sacraments of baptism and Communion are both related to the Resurrection, and would have been senseless in the early church apart from the historical reality of the Resurrection.\n\n
  236. (7) The complete disregard for the tomb of Jesus by the first-century church also illustrates that these Christians knew they were serving the resurrected Lord.\n\n
  237. (7) The complete disregard for the tomb of Jesus by the first-century church also illustrates that these Christians knew they were serving the resurrected Lord.\n\n
  238. (8) The conversions of James and Paul offer significant circumstantial evidence for the Resurrection. James was opposed to the claims of his half brother Jesus (John 7:5), but a transformation took place after the risen Jesus appeared to him (1 Cor. 15:7). He became the leader of the Jerusalem church and called himself a "bond-servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ" (James 1:1). The incredible change in the zealous young Pharisee, Saul, is also inexplicable apart from the Resurrection. Saul, the fierce persecutor of Christians, suddenly became Paul, the persecuted Christian. He was never the same after he beheld the glory of Christ on the road to Damascus.\n\n
  239. (8) The conversions of James and Paul offer significant circumstantial evidence for the Resurrection. James was opposed to the claims of his half brother Jesus (John 7:5), but a transformation took place after the risen Jesus appeared to him (1 Cor. 15:7). He became the leader of the Jerusalem church and called himself a "bond-servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ" (James 1:1). The incredible change in the zealous young Pharisee, Saul, is also inexplicable apart from the Resurrection. Saul, the fierce persecutor of Christians, suddenly became Paul, the persecuted Christian. He was never the same after he beheld the glory of Christ on the road to Damascus.\n\n
  240. (8) The conversions of James and Paul offer significant circumstantial evidence for the Resurrection. James was opposed to the claims of his half brother Jesus (John 7:5), but a transformation took place after the risen Jesus appeared to him (1 Cor. 15:7). He became the leader of the Jerusalem church and called himself a "bond-servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ" (James 1:1). The incredible change in the zealous young Pharisee, Saul, is also inexplicable apart from the Resurrection. Saul, the fierce persecutor of Christians, suddenly became Paul, the persecuted Christian. He was never the same after he beheld the glory of Christ on the road to Damascus.\n\n
  241. (8) The conversions of James and Paul offer significant circumstantial evidence for the Resurrection. James was opposed to the claims of his half brother Jesus (John 7:5), but a transformation took place after the risen Jesus appeared to him (1 Cor. 15:7). He became the leader of the Jerusalem church and called himself a "bond-servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ" (James 1:1). The incredible change in the zealous young Pharisee, Saul, is also inexplicable apart from the Resurrection. Saul, the fierce persecutor of Christians, suddenly became Paul, the persecuted Christian. He was never the same after he beheld the glory of Christ on the road to Damascus.\n\n
  242. All the attempts to find naturalistic explanations for the historical facts related to the Resurrection have failed. The direct evidence concerning the tomb and the appearances combined with the circumstantial evidences establishes beyond a reasonable doubt the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ. He conquered the grave, and He offers resurrection life to those who place their trust in Him.\n\n
  243. All the attempts to find naturalistic explanations for the historical facts related to the Resurrection have failed. The direct evidence concerning the tomb and the appearances combined with the circumstantial evidences establishes beyond a reasonable doubt the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ. He conquered the grave, and He offers resurrection life to those who place their trust in Him.\n\n
  244. All the attempts to find naturalistic explanations for the historical facts related to the Resurrection have failed. The direct evidence concerning the tomb and the appearances combined with the circumstantial evidences establishes beyond a reasonable doubt the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ. He conquered the grave, and He offers resurrection life to those who place their trust in Him.\n\n
  245. All the attempts to find naturalistic explanations for the historical facts related to the Resurrection have failed. The direct evidence concerning the tomb and the appearances combined with the circumstantial evidences establishes beyond a reasonable doubt the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ. He conquered the grave, and He offers resurrection life to those who place their trust in Him.\n\n
  246. All the attempts to find naturalistic explanations for the historical facts related to the Resurrection have failed. The direct evidence concerning the tomb and the appearances combined with the circumstantial evidences establishes beyond a reasonable doubt the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ. He conquered the grave, and He offers resurrection life to those who place their trust in Him.\n\n
  247. All the attempts to find naturalistic explanations for the historical facts related to the Resurrection have failed. The direct evidence concerning the tomb and the appearances combined with the circumstantial evidences establishes beyond a reasonable doubt the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ. He conquered the grave, and He offers resurrection life to those who place their trust in Him.\n\n
  248. \n
  249. \n
  250. \n
  251. \n
  252. \n
  253. \n
  254. \n
  255. \n
  256. \n